Pub Date : 2024-12-01Epub Date: 2024-10-21DOI: 10.5271/sjweh.4192
Elin Ekblom-Bak, Magnus Lindwall, Linnea Eriksson, Andreas Stenling, Magnus Svartengren, Robert Lundmark, Lena Kallings, Erik Hemmingsson, Daniel Väisänen
Objectives: This study aimed to investigate the reach of a large-scale health assessment delivered by the occupational health service in Sweden for almost 30 years.
Methods: A total of 418 286 individuals who participated in a health assessment (Health Profile Assessment, HPA) between 1995-2021 were included. A comparative sample was obtained from Statistics Sweden, comprising the entire working population for each year (4 962 127-6 011 829 unique individuals per time period). Sociodemographic and work organization characteristics were compared between the HPA and comparative population for six different periods. Under- and overrepresented groups in the private and public sectors were identified using the most recent data (2015-2021).
Results: With negative per cent indicating underrepresentation, the most notable changes over time in representation in the HPA population compared to the comparative were observed for women (-1.2% to -12.8%), private sector employees (-9.4% to 14.9%), individuals with ≥3 years of employment (14.5% to 0.9%), in personal care (0.8% to -8.8%) and manufacturing (0.7% to 6.4%) occupations. Consistently overrepresented groups (median representation across periods) included individuals who had a single income source (6.3%) and were middle-aged (10.8%), born in Sweden (5.9%), associate professionals (8.7%), and employed in companies with high operating profit (17.9%) and low staff turnover (14.3%). Conversely, individuals with low income (-34.0%) and employed in small companies/organizations (-10.9%) were consistently underrepresented. Middle-aged women in education occupations were most underrepresented in the public sector, while in the private sector, it was young women in service and shop sales occupations.
Conclusions: This health assessment has reached many professionals, including hard-to-reach groups, but did not fully represents the Swedish workforce throughout the years.
{"title":"In or out of reach? Long-term trends in the reach of health assessments in the Swedish occupational setting.","authors":"Elin Ekblom-Bak, Magnus Lindwall, Linnea Eriksson, Andreas Stenling, Magnus Svartengren, Robert Lundmark, Lena Kallings, Erik Hemmingsson, Daniel Väisänen","doi":"10.5271/sjweh.4192","DOIUrl":"10.5271/sjweh.4192","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>This study aimed to investigate the reach of a large-scale health assessment delivered by the occupational health service in Sweden for almost 30 years.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A total of 418 286 individuals who participated in a health assessment (Health Profile Assessment, HPA) between 1995-2021 were included. A comparative sample was obtained from Statistics Sweden, comprising the entire working population for each year (4 962 127-6 011 829 unique individuals per time period). Sociodemographic and work organization characteristics were compared between the HPA and comparative population for six different periods. Under- and overrepresented groups in the private and public sectors were identified using the most recent data (2015-2021).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>With negative per cent indicating underrepresentation, the most notable changes over time in representation in the HPA population compared to the comparative were observed for women (-1.2% to -12.8%), private sector employees (-9.4% to 14.9%), individuals with ≥3 years of employment (14.5% to 0.9%), in personal care (0.8% to -8.8%) and manufacturing (0.7% to 6.4%) occupations. Consistently overrepresented groups (median representation across periods) included individuals who had a single income source (6.3%) and were middle-aged (10.8%), born in Sweden (5.9%), associate professionals (8.7%), and employed in companies with high operating profit (17.9%) and low staff turnover (14.3%). Conversely, individuals with low income (-34.0%) and employed in small companies/organizations (-10.9%) were consistently underrepresented. Middle-aged women in education occupations were most underrepresented in the public sector, while in the private sector, it was young women in service and shop sales occupations.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This health assessment has reached many professionals, including hard-to-reach groups, but did not fully represents the Swedish workforce throughout the years.</p>","PeriodicalId":21528,"journal":{"name":"Scandinavian journal of work, environment & health","volume":" ","pages":"641-652"},"PeriodicalIF":4.7,"publicationDate":"2024-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11626603/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142473798","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-12-01Epub Date: 2024-10-29DOI: 10.5271/sjweh.4194
Allison Singier, Marc Fadel, Fabien Gilbert, Laura Temime, Marie Zins, Alexis Descatha
Objectives: This study aimed to develop and evaluate a job-exposure matrix (JEM) specific to healthcare workers, JEM Soignances, based on self-reported data.
Methods: The JEM was constructed using data from healthcare workers within the CONSTANCES cohort (N=12 489). Job titles and sectors of activity (eg, hospital activities) defined occupational groups. We assessed 24 exposures covering organizational, psychosocial, physical, chemical and biological factors. Several methods (group-based frequency, CART, random forest, extreme gradient boosting machine) were applied using a 70% training sample. Performance was evaluated on the remaining 30% using area under the ROC curve (AUC) and Cohen's Kappa (κ). Two alternative JEM were proposed using only job titles or adding healthcare establishment size and type (public/private) to define occupational groups.
Results: All methods offered similar discriminatory power (AUC). We selected the group-based frequency method as it was the most understandable and easiest to implement. Of the 24 included exposures, 15 demonstrated satisfactory performance, with nine showing good discriminatory power and fair-to-moderate agreement, such as physical effort at work (AUC=0.861, κ=0.556), ionizing radiation exposure (AUC=0.865, κ=0.457), carrying heavy loads (AUC=0.840, κ=0.402), shift work (AUC=0.807, κ=0.383), and formaldehyde exposure (AUC=0.847, κ=0.289). The remaining nine exposures mainly showed poor-to-moderate discriminatory power and poor agreement. Compared to JEM Soignances, the job title-only JEM performed poorly, while the one incorporating healthcare establishment size and type showed similar results.
Conclusions: JEM Soignances provides good internal performance and validity. Future research will assess its external validity by comparing it with existing JEM and examining its predictive validity regarding known associations between exposures and health outcomes (eg, long working hours and strokes).
{"title":"Development and validation of a French job-exposure matrix for healthcare workers: JEM Soignances.","authors":"Allison Singier, Marc Fadel, Fabien Gilbert, Laura Temime, Marie Zins, Alexis Descatha","doi":"10.5271/sjweh.4194","DOIUrl":"10.5271/sjweh.4194","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>This study aimed to develop and evaluate a job-exposure matrix (JEM) specific to healthcare workers, JEM Soignances, based on self-reported data.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The JEM was constructed using data from healthcare workers within the CONSTANCES cohort (N=12 489). Job titles and sectors of activity (eg, hospital activities) defined occupational groups. We assessed 24 exposures covering organizational, psychosocial, physical, chemical and biological factors. Several methods (group-based frequency, CART, random forest, extreme gradient boosting machine) were applied using a 70% training sample. Performance was evaluated on the remaining 30% using area under the ROC curve (AUC) and Cohen's Kappa (κ). Two alternative JEM were proposed using only job titles or adding healthcare establishment size and type (public/private) to define occupational groups.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>All methods offered similar discriminatory power (AUC). We selected the group-based frequency method as it was the most understandable and easiest to implement. Of the 24 included exposures, 15 demonstrated satisfactory performance, with nine showing good discriminatory power and fair-to-moderate agreement, such as physical effort at work (AUC=0.861, κ=0.556), ionizing radiation exposure (AUC=0.865, κ=0.457), carrying heavy loads (AUC=0.840, κ=0.402), shift work (AUC=0.807, κ=0.383), and formaldehyde exposure (AUC=0.847, κ=0.289). The remaining nine exposures mainly showed poor-to-moderate discriminatory power and poor agreement. Compared to JEM Soignances, the job title-only JEM performed poorly, while the one incorporating healthcare establishment size and type showed similar results.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>JEM Soignances provides good internal performance and validity. Future research will assess its external validity by comparing it with existing JEM and examining its predictive validity regarding known associations between exposures and health outcomes (eg, long working hours and strokes).</p>","PeriodicalId":21528,"journal":{"name":"Scandinavian journal of work, environment & health","volume":" ","pages":"653-664"},"PeriodicalIF":4.7,"publicationDate":"2024-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11626462/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142547159","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-12-01Epub Date: 2024-11-12DOI: 10.5271/sjweh.4199
Alex Burdorf
{"title":"When will we have enough evidence to require improvements at the workplace?","authors":"Alex Burdorf","doi":"10.5271/sjweh.4199","DOIUrl":"10.5271/sjweh.4199","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":21528,"journal":{"name":"Scandinavian journal of work, environment & health","volume":" ","pages":"577-580"},"PeriodicalIF":4.7,"publicationDate":"2024-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11616390/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142626488","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-12-01Epub Date: 2024-09-12DOI: 10.5271/sjweh.4186
Charlotte Diana Nørregaard Rasmussen, Louise Fleng Sandal, Andreas Holtermann, Mette Jensen Stochkendahl, Paul Jarle Mork, Karen Søgaard
Objective: This study aimed to investigate whether physical work demands modify the effect of the selfBACK app, which is designed to support self-management of low-back pain.
Methods: In a secondary analysis of the selfBACK trial with 346 employed participants, we stratified into low (N=165) and high physical work demands (N=181). Outcomes included the Roland-Morris Disability Questionnaire (0-24), a numeric rating scale for low-back pain intensity (0-10), the Pain Self-Efficacy Questionnaire (0-60), and work ability (0-10). Intervention effects were assessed at three- and nine-month follow-ups using a linear mixed model.
Results: At three months, high physical demand workers with selfBACK showed a significant reduction in pain intensity [-0.8, 95% confidence interval (CI) -1.3- -0.2] compared to usual care. By nine months, the high physical demands workers with selfBACK reported reduced pain-related disability (-1.4, 95% CI -2.7- -0.1), improved pain self-efficacy (3.5, 95% CI 0.9-6.0), and lower pain intensity (-1.0, 95% CI -1.6- -0.4) compared to usual care. Low physical demands workers with selfBACK also improved pain self-efficacy [2.8 (95% CI 0.3-5.3)] compared to usual care. The impact of selfBACK was more noticeable among workers with high physical demands compared to their low physical demand counterparts, but no statistically significant differences were found in any outcome.
Conclusions: The selfBACK intervention had consistent effects across workers with high and low physical work demands, indicating that these demands did not modify its impact. Both groups experienced similar positive effects, highlighting the intervention's effectiveness across varying levels of physical work demands.
目的:本研究旨在探讨体力劳动需求是否会改变selfBACK应用程序的效果:本研究旨在调查体力劳动需求是否会改变selfBACK应用程序的效果,该应用程序旨在支持腰背痛的自我管理:在对有 346 名在职参与者参加的 selfBACK 试验进行的二次分析中,我们将参与者分为体力工作要求低(165 人)和体力工作要求高(181 人)两类。结果包括罗兰-莫里斯残疾问卷(0-24)、腰背痛强度数字评分量表(0-10)、疼痛自我效能问卷(0-60)和工作能力(0-10)。在三个月和九个月的随访中,采用线性混合模型对干预效果进行了评估:结果:与常规护理相比,三个月后,采用自我康复治疗的高体力需求工人的疼痛强度显著降低[-0.8,95% 置信区间(CI)-1.3--0.2]。到九个月时,与常规护理相比,有自我心理辅导的高体力需求工作者的疼痛相关残疾程度降低了(-1.4,95% CI -2.7--0.1),疼痛自我效能感提高了(3.5,95% CI 0.9-6.0),疼痛强度降低了(-1.0,95% CI -1.6- -0.4)。与常规护理相比,低体力要求工人使用自我心理支持也提高了疼痛自我效能感[2.8 (95% CI 0.3-5.3)]。与体力需求低的工人相比,自我BACK对体力需求高的工人的影响更为明显,但在任何结果上都没有发现有统计学意义的差异:selfBACK干预对体力要求高和体力要求低的工人产生了一致的效果,表明体力要求并没有改变其影响。两组人都体验到了类似的积极效果,凸显了该干预措施在不同体力工作需求水平下的有效性。
{"title":"Effect of a smartphone self-management digital support system for low-back pain (selfBACK) among workers with high physical work demands - secondary analysis of a randomized controlled trial.","authors":"Charlotte Diana Nørregaard Rasmussen, Louise Fleng Sandal, Andreas Holtermann, Mette Jensen Stochkendahl, Paul Jarle Mork, Karen Søgaard","doi":"10.5271/sjweh.4186","DOIUrl":"10.5271/sjweh.4186","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study aimed to investigate whether physical work demands modify the effect of the selfBACK app, which is designed to support self-management of low-back pain.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In a secondary analysis of the selfBACK trial with 346 employed participants, we stratified into low (N=165) and high physical work demands (N=181). Outcomes included the Roland-Morris Disability Questionnaire (0-24), a numeric rating scale for low-back pain intensity (0-10), the Pain Self-Efficacy Questionnaire (0-60), and work ability (0-10). Intervention effects were assessed at three- and nine-month follow-ups using a linear mixed model.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>At three months, high physical demand workers with selfBACK showed a significant reduction in pain intensity [-0.8, 95% confidence interval (CI) -1.3- -0.2] compared to usual care. By nine months, the high physical demands workers with selfBACK reported reduced pain-related disability (-1.4, 95% CI -2.7- -0.1), improved pain self-efficacy (3.5, 95% CI 0.9-6.0), and lower pain intensity (-1.0, 95% CI -1.6- -0.4) compared to usual care. Low physical demands workers with selfBACK also improved pain self-efficacy [2.8 (95% CI 0.3-5.3)] compared to usual care. The impact of selfBACK was more noticeable among workers with high physical demands compared to their low physical demand counterparts, but no statistically significant differences were found in any outcome.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The selfBACK intervention had consistent effects across workers with high and low physical work demands, indicating that these demands did not modify its impact. Both groups experienced similar positive effects, highlighting the intervention's effectiveness across varying levels of physical work demands.</p>","PeriodicalId":21528,"journal":{"name":"Scandinavian journal of work, environment & health","volume":" ","pages":"613-621"},"PeriodicalIF":4.7,"publicationDate":"2024-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11618318/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142294414","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Objectives: Return to work (RTW) of workers with mental disorders is often a process of gradually increasing work hours over time, resulting in a RTW trajectory. This study aimed to investigate 2-year RTW trajectories by mental disorder diagnosis, examining the distribution of age, sex and contracted work hours across the diagnosis-specific RTW trajectories.
Methods: Sickness absence episodes diagnosed within the ICD-10 chapter V (mental and behavioral disorders) and ICD-10 Z73.0 (burnout) were retrieved from a Dutch occupational health service register, together with age, sex and contracted work hours. Sickness absence episodes due to adjustment disorders (N=25 075), anxiety disorders (N=1335), burnout (N=3644), mood disorders (N=5076), and post-traumatic stress disorders (N=2393) were most prevalent and included in latent class growth analysis (LCGA) to estimate 23-month RTW trajectories.
Results: Four main RTW trajectories were identified for all mental disorder diagnoses: fast full RTW [range 82.4% (mood disorders) to 92.0% (adjustment disorders) of the study population], slow full RTW [3.5% (burnout) to 6.1% (mood disorders)], slow partial RTW [0.6% (adjustment disorders) to 1.6% (mood disorders)] and no RTW [2.2% (adjustment disorders) to 9.7% (mood disorders)]. Trajectories with a late onset of fast full RTW included higher percentages of women and lower percentages of full-time workers.
Conclusions: RTW trajectories were similar for different mental disorder diagnoses although the distribution differed across diagnoses, with more partial and no RTW trajectories among workers with mood disorders. To better guide workers back to work, more knowledge is needed of factors associated with late, partial, or no RTW.
{"title":"Do return-to-work trajectories differ by mental disorder diagnosis? A register study among 37 523 Dutch workers.","authors":"Robèrt Vendelbosch, Corné Roelen, Josué Almansa, Ute Bültmann, Iris Arends","doi":"10.5271/sjweh.4183","DOIUrl":"10.5271/sjweh.4183","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Return to work (RTW) of workers with mental disorders is often a process of gradually increasing work hours over time, resulting in a RTW trajectory. This study aimed to investigate 2-year RTW trajectories by mental disorder diagnosis, examining the distribution of age, sex and contracted work hours across the diagnosis-specific RTW trajectories.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Sickness absence episodes diagnosed within the ICD-10 chapter V (mental and behavioral disorders) and ICD-10 Z73.0 (burnout) were retrieved from a Dutch occupational health service register, together with age, sex and contracted work hours. Sickness absence episodes due to adjustment disorders (N=25 075), anxiety disorders (N=1335), burnout (N=3644), mood disorders (N=5076), and post-traumatic stress disorders (N=2393) were most prevalent and included in latent class growth analysis (LCGA) to estimate 23-month RTW trajectories.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Four main RTW trajectories were identified for all mental disorder diagnoses: fast full RTW [range 82.4% (mood disorders) to 92.0% (adjustment disorders) of the study population], slow full RTW [3.5% (burnout) to 6.1% (mood disorders)], slow partial RTW [0.6% (adjustment disorders) to 1.6% (mood disorders)] and no RTW [2.2% (adjustment disorders) to 9.7% (mood disorders)]. Trajectories with a late onset of fast full RTW included higher percentages of women and lower percentages of full-time workers.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>RTW trajectories were similar for different mental disorder diagnoses although the distribution differed across diagnoses, with more partial and no RTW trajectories among workers with mood disorders. To better guide workers back to work, more knowledge is needed of factors associated with late, partial, or no RTW.</p>","PeriodicalId":21528,"journal":{"name":"Scandinavian journal of work, environment & health","volume":"50 7","pages":"527-535"},"PeriodicalIF":4.7,"publicationDate":"2024-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11473124/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142353111","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-10-01Epub Date: 2024-07-31DOI: 10.5271/sjweh.4179
Xiaocong Guo, Kate R Weinberger, Lillian Tamburic, Cheryl E Peters, Christopher B McLeod
Objectives: British Columbia (BC), Canada, experienced an unprecedented summer with record-breaking high temperatures in 2021. Yet the health impact has not been examined in occupational settings. This study aimed to characterize occupational heat-related illness (HRI) among BC workers estimated by incidence rates and associations between heatwaves and HRI, compare risks from 2021 and prior summers of 2001-2020, and assess differential impacts on worker groups by demographics and occupations.
Methods: We identified HRI from workers' compensation claims that occurred between June and August from 2001-2021 in BC. Incidence rates were calculated using working population estimates from Statistics Canada's Labour Force Survey. A time-stratified case-crossover design with conditional Poisson regression was used to examine the impact of heatwaves on occupational HRI. All analyses were stratified by year (2021 versus 2001-2020), age, sex, and occupation.
Results: Of the 521 claims identified, 107 (21%) occurred in 2021. Incidence rates for 2021 and prior summers were 3.97 [95% confidence interval (CI) 3.26-4.80] and 0.93 (95% CI 0.85-1.03) claims per 100 000 workers, respectively. This difference represents a 327% increase. Rates were higher in health occupations in 2021 versus 2001-2020. During 2001-2021, the risk of HRI during heatwave days was 4.33 (95% CI 2.98-6.27) times that during non-heatwave days, and the risk was higher among middle-aged workers and workers in trades, transport, and equipment operations. The 2021 heatwaves had greater impact on younger and female workers than those from prior summers.
Conclusions: Heat is a crucial workplace hazard. Prevention strategies should prioritize at-risk workers and not be limited to heatwaves.
{"title":"Heat-related illness among workers in British Columbia, Canada: Extreme hot weather in 2021 compared to 2001-2020.","authors":"Xiaocong Guo, Kate R Weinberger, Lillian Tamburic, Cheryl E Peters, Christopher B McLeod","doi":"10.5271/sjweh.4179","DOIUrl":"10.5271/sjweh.4179","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>British Columbia (BC), Canada, experienced an unprecedented summer with record-breaking high temperatures in 2021. Yet the health impact has not been examined in occupational settings. This study aimed to characterize occupational heat-related illness (HRI) among BC workers estimated by incidence rates and associations between heatwaves and HRI, compare risks from 2021 and prior summers of 2001-2020, and assess differential impacts on worker groups by demographics and occupations.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We identified HRI from workers' compensation claims that occurred between June and August from 2001-2021 in BC. Incidence rates were calculated using working population estimates from Statistics Canada's Labour Force Survey. A time-stratified case-crossover design with conditional Poisson regression was used to examine the impact of heatwaves on occupational HRI. All analyses were stratified by year (2021 versus 2001-2020), age, sex, and occupation.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of the 521 claims identified, 107 (21%) occurred in 2021. Incidence rates for 2021 and prior summers were 3.97 [95% confidence interval (CI) 3.26-4.80] and 0.93 (95% CI 0.85-1.03) claims per 100 000 workers, respectively. This difference represents a 327% increase. Rates were higher in health occupations in 2021 versus 2001-2020. During 2001-2021, the risk of HRI during heatwave days was 4.33 (95% CI 2.98-6.27) times that during non-heatwave days, and the risk was higher among middle-aged workers and workers in trades, transport, and equipment operations. The 2021 heatwaves had greater impact on younger and female workers than those from prior summers.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Heat is a crucial workplace hazard. Prevention strategies should prioritize at-risk workers and not be limited to heatwaves.</p>","PeriodicalId":21528,"journal":{"name":"Scandinavian journal of work, environment & health","volume":" ","pages":"545-554"},"PeriodicalIF":4.7,"publicationDate":"2024-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11474959/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141856425","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-10-01Epub Date: 2024-09-02DOI: 10.5271/sjweh.4185
Henriëtte M van Duijne, Nina E Berentzen, Roel C H Vermeulen, Jelle J Vlaanderen, Hans Kromhout, Katarzyna Jóźwiak, Anouk Pijpe, Matti A Rookus, Flora E van Leeuwen, Michael Schaapveld
Objective: This study aimed to prospectively investigate associations of working night shifts with weight gain in the Nightingale Study, a large cohort of female nurses.
Methods: This study included 36 273 registered nurses, who completed questionnaires in 2011 and 2017. Cumulative number of nights, mean number of nights/month and consecutive number of nights/month in 2007-2011 were assessed. We used Poisson regression to estimate multivariable-adjusted incidence rate ratios (IRR) of >5% weight gain from 2011 to 2017 among all participants and assess risk of development of overweight/obesity (BMI≥25 kg/m2) among women with healthy baseline body mass index. The reference group consisted of women who never worked nights.
Results: Overall, working night shifts in 2007-2011 was associated with >5% weight gain [IRR 1.07, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.01-1.13]. Associations differed by menopausal status in 2011, with an increased risk of gaining >5% weight limited to postmenopausal women who worked nights (IRR 1.23, 95% CI 1.10-1.38). Postmenopausal women had an increased risk of >5% weight gain when they worked on average ≥4 nights/month (4-5: IRR 1.29, 95% CI 1.09-1.52, ≥6: IRR 1.27, 95% CI 1.11-1.47) or ≥4 consecutive nights/month (IRR 1.37, 95% CI 1.19-1.58), compared to postmenopausal women who never worked nights. For postmenopausal women with healthy weight at baseline, night shift work was associated with an increased risk of overweight/obesity at follow-up (IRR 1.24, 95% CI 1.03-1.50).
Conclusions: Working night shifts was associated with a slightly increased risk of weight gain and overweight/obesity development among women who were postmenopausal at study inclusion. Our findings emphasize the importance of health promotion to maintain a healthy weight among (postmenopausal) night workers.
研究目的本研究旨在前瞻性地调查南丁格尔研究(一个大型女护士队列)中上夜班与体重增加之间的关系:这项研究包括 36 273 名注册护士,她们分别于 2011 年和 2017 年填写了调查问卷。评估了 2007-2011 年的累计夜数、平均夜数/月和连续夜数/月。我们使用泊松回归法估算了 2011 年至 2017 年所有参与者体重增加 >5% 的多变量调整后发病率比 (IRR),并评估了基线体重指数健康的女性患超重/肥胖症(BMI≥25 kg/m2)的风险。参照组包括从未上过夜班的女性:总体而言,2007-2011年上夜班与体重增加>5%有关[IRR为1.07,95%置信区间(CI)为1.01-1.13]。2011年,不同绝经状态的妇女与体重增加>5%的相关性有所不同,增加的风险仅限于上夜班的绝经后妇女(IRR为1.23,95% 置信区间(CI)为1.10-1.38)。与从未上过夜班的绝经后妇女相比,绝经后妇女平均每月上夜班≥4次(4-5次:IRR 1.29,95% CI 1.09-1.52;≥6次:IRR 1.27,95% CI 1.11-1.47)或每月连续上夜班≥4次(IRR 1.37,95% CI 1.19-1.58),体重增加>5%的风险会增加。对于基线体重健康的绝经后妇女,夜班工作与随访时超重/肥胖风险增加有关(IRR 1.24,95% CI 1.03-1.50):结论:在纳入研究的绝经后妇女中,上夜班与体重增加和超重/肥胖风险略有增加有关。我们的研究结果强调了促进健康以保持(绝经后)夜班工作者健康体重的重要性。
{"title":"Associations of night shift work with weight gain among female nurses in The Netherlands: results of a prospective cohort study.","authors":"Henriëtte M van Duijne, Nina E Berentzen, Roel C H Vermeulen, Jelle J Vlaanderen, Hans Kromhout, Katarzyna Jóźwiak, Anouk Pijpe, Matti A Rookus, Flora E van Leeuwen, Michael Schaapveld","doi":"10.5271/sjweh.4185","DOIUrl":"10.5271/sjweh.4185","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study aimed to prospectively investigate associations of working night shifts with weight gain in the Nightingale Study, a large cohort of female nurses.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This study included 36 273 registered nurses, who completed questionnaires in 2011 and 2017. Cumulative number of nights, mean number of nights/month and consecutive number of nights/month in 2007-2011 were assessed. We used Poisson regression to estimate multivariable-adjusted incidence rate ratios (IRR) of >5% weight gain from 2011 to 2017 among all participants and assess risk of development of overweight/obesity (BMI≥25 kg/m<sup>2</sup>) among women with healthy baseline body mass index. The reference group consisted of women who never worked nights.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Overall, working night shifts in 2007-2011 was associated with >5% weight gain [IRR 1.07, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.01-1.13]. Associations differed by menopausal status in 2011, with an increased risk of gaining >5% weight limited to postmenopausal women who worked nights (IRR 1.23, 95% CI 1.10-1.38). Postmenopausal women had an increased risk of >5% weight gain when they worked on average ≥4 nights/month (4-5: IRR 1.29, 95% CI 1.09-1.52, ≥6: IRR 1.27, 95% CI 1.11-1.47) or ≥4 consecutive nights/month (IRR 1.37, 95% CI 1.19-1.58), compared to postmenopausal women who never worked nights. For postmenopausal women with healthy weight at baseline, night shift work was associated with an increased risk of overweight/obesity at follow-up (IRR 1.24, 95% CI 1.03-1.50).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Working night shifts was associated with a slightly increased risk of weight gain and overweight/obesity development among women who were postmenopausal at study inclusion. Our findings emphasize the importance of health promotion to maintain a healthy weight among (postmenopausal) night workers.</p>","PeriodicalId":21528,"journal":{"name":"Scandinavian journal of work, environment & health","volume":" ","pages":"536-544"},"PeriodicalIF":4.7,"publicationDate":"2024-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11473151/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142111580","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-10-01Epub Date: 2024-08-14DOI: 10.5271/sjweh.4182
Joungsue Kim, Ria Kwon, Hyunok Yun, Ga-Young Lim, Kyung-Sook Woo, Inah Kim
Objectives: The association between occupational psychosocial factors and mental health has been studied in several systematic reviews. However, few systematic reviews exist that specifically address suicidal ideation. Therefore, this systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to examine the associations between long working hours, shift work, and suicidal ideation.
Methods: We systematically screened and collected studies published between January 1970 and September 2022 from three electronic databases and Google Scholar. We conducted a meta-analysis using a random-effects model and assessed the risk of bias using a navigation guide. Additionally, the grading of recommendations assessment, development and evaluation (GRADE) approach was used to consider five items, including the risk of bias and publication bias.
Results: Twenty-eight articles were included in this meta-analysis. After adjusting for covariates, the overall odds ratio (OR) for long working hours and shift work were 1.44 [95% confidence interval (CI) 1.26-1.63] and 1.34 (95% CI 1.22-1.47), respectively. Compared with those who worked <40 hours per week, those who worked >55 hours per week had a 1.65 (95% CI 1.37-1.98) higher risk of suicidal ideation, and fixed night shift workers had 1.37 (95% CI 1.03-1.83) higher risk than non-shift workers.
Conclusions: Evidence has shown associations between long working hours, shift work, and suicidal ideation. Implementing evidence-based interventions to address these risk factors may help prevent the progression of suicidal ideation. However, further studies are critically needed, especially those using standardized exposure definitions and longitudinal data.
研究目的多篇系统性综述对职业心理社会因素与心理健康之间的关系进行了研究。然而,很少有系统综述专门针对自杀意念。因此,本系统综述和荟萃分析旨在研究长时间工作、轮班工作与自杀意念之间的关联:我们从三个电子数据库和谷歌学术中系统地筛选并收集了 1970 年 1 月至 2022 年 9 月间发表的研究。我们使用随机效应模型进行了荟萃分析,并使用导航指南评估了偏倚风险。此外,我们还采用了建议评估、发展和评价分级法(GRADE)来考虑五个项目,包括偏倚风险和发表偏倚:本次荟萃分析共纳入了 28 篇文章。在对协变量进行调整后,长时间工作和轮班工作的总体几率比(OR)分别为 1.44 [95% 置信区间 (CI) 1.26-1.63] 和 1.34 (95% CI 1.22-1.47)。与每周工作55小时的人相比,有自杀倾向的风险高出1.65(95% CI 1.37-1.98),固定夜班工人比非轮班工人的风险高出1.37(95% CI 1.03-1.83):有证据表明,长时间工作、轮班工作与自杀倾向之间存在关联。针对这些风险因素实施循证干预措施可能有助于预防自杀倾向的发展。然而,我们亟需开展进一步的研究,尤其是那些使用标准化暴露定义和纵向数据的研究。
{"title":"The association between long working hours, shift work, and suicidal ideation: A systematic review and meta-analyses.","authors":"Joungsue Kim, Ria Kwon, Hyunok Yun, Ga-Young Lim, Kyung-Sook Woo, Inah Kim","doi":"10.5271/sjweh.4182","DOIUrl":"10.5271/sjweh.4182","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>The association between occupational psychosocial factors and mental health has been studied in several systematic reviews. However, few systematic reviews exist that specifically address suicidal ideation. Therefore, this systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to examine the associations between long working hours, shift work, and suicidal ideation.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We systematically screened and collected studies published between January 1970 and September 2022 from three electronic databases and Google Scholar. We conducted a meta-analysis using a random-effects model and assessed the risk of bias using a navigation guide. Additionally, the grading of recommendations assessment, development and evaluation (GRADE) approach was used to consider five items, including the risk of bias and publication bias.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Twenty-eight articles were included in this meta-analysis. After adjusting for covariates, the overall odds ratio (OR) for long working hours and shift work were 1.44 [95% confidence interval (CI) 1.26-1.63] and 1.34 (95% CI 1.22-1.47), respectively. Compared with those who worked <40 hours per week, those who worked >55 hours per week had a 1.65 (95% CI 1.37-1.98) higher risk of suicidal ideation, and fixed night shift workers had 1.37 (95% CI 1.03-1.83) higher risk than non-shift workers.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Evidence has shown associations between long working hours, shift work, and suicidal ideation. Implementing evidence-based interventions to address these risk factors may help prevent the progression of suicidal ideation. However, further studies are critically needed, especially those using standardized exposure definitions and longitudinal data.</p>","PeriodicalId":21528,"journal":{"name":"Scandinavian journal of work, environment & health","volume":" ","pages":"503-518"},"PeriodicalIF":4.7,"publicationDate":"2024-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11472300/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141976464","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-10-01Epub Date: 2024-09-20DOI: 10.5271/sjweh.4188
Reiner Rugulies
{"title":"When work interferes with life.","authors":"Reiner Rugulies","doi":"10.5271/sjweh.4188","DOIUrl":"10.5271/sjweh.4188","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":21528,"journal":{"name":"Scandinavian journal of work, environment & health","volume":" ","pages":"485-488"},"PeriodicalIF":4.7,"publicationDate":"2024-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11466286/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142294417","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-10-01Epub Date: 2024-09-23DOI: 10.5271/sjweh.4190
Michelle C Turner, Kurt Straif, Manolis Kogevinas, Mary K Schubauer-Berigan
Objective: In this discussion paper, we provide a narrative review of past and present occupational cancer studies in the journal with a viewpoint towards future occupational cancer research.
Method: We reviewed all references in the journal that mentioned cancer according to relevance to etiology, cancer type, agent type, study design, and study population.
Results: The Scandinavian Journal of Work, Environment & Health has published over 300 manuscripts on occupational cancer over the 50 past years. Although studies of cancer represent the primary health outcome in the journal overall, the relative ranking of cancer manuscripts has declined somewhat over time. A large body of evidence from studies of occupation and industry was apparent both in early research and continuing in recent years. There are several examples of the utility of pooled multi-country collaborative studies. Studies also took advantage of available high-quality national population and cancer registers in Nordic countries. There have been notable shifts in focus with regard to the cancer types examined, with increases in publications examining female breast cancer over the decades. The interplay of studies of occupational and environmental cancer has also been apparent.
Conclusions: The journal offers a unique viewpoint to consider the evolution of occupational cancer evidence over time. Studies of occupational cancer have played a central role in global cancer hazard identification efforts. Although much has been gained, there remains a need for renewed global support for occupational cancer research. Concerted efforts will be needed to ensure a future robust evidence-base for occupational and environmental cancer worldwide.
{"title":"Five decades of occupational cancer epidemiology.","authors":"Michelle C Turner, Kurt Straif, Manolis Kogevinas, Mary K Schubauer-Berigan","doi":"10.5271/sjweh.4190","DOIUrl":"10.5271/sjweh.4190","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>In this discussion paper, we provide a narrative review of past and present occupational cancer studies in the journal with a viewpoint towards future occupational cancer research.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>We reviewed all references in the journal that mentioned cancer according to relevance to etiology, cancer type, agent type, study design, and study population.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The Scandinavian Journal of Work, Environment & Health has published over 300 manuscripts on occupational cancer over the 50 past years. Although studies of cancer represent the primary health outcome in the journal overall, the relative ranking of cancer manuscripts has declined somewhat over time. A large body of evidence from studies of occupation and industry was apparent both in early research and continuing in recent years. There are several examples of the utility of pooled multi-country collaborative studies. Studies also took advantage of available high-quality national population and cancer registers in Nordic countries. There have been notable shifts in focus with regard to the cancer types examined, with increases in publications examining female breast cancer over the decades. The interplay of studies of occupational and environmental cancer has also been apparent.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The journal offers a unique viewpoint to consider the evolution of occupational cancer evidence over time. Studies of occupational cancer have played a central role in global cancer hazard identification efforts. Although much has been gained, there remains a need for renewed global support for occupational cancer research. Concerted efforts will be needed to ensure a future robust evidence-base for occupational and environmental cancer worldwide.</p>","PeriodicalId":21528,"journal":{"name":"Scandinavian journal of work, environment & health","volume":" ","pages":"489-502"},"PeriodicalIF":4.7,"publicationDate":"2024-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11468312/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142294415","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}