Supportive Care in Cancer最新文献

Purpose: Colorectal cancer threatens health and causes heavy social burdens. The purpose of this study is to analyze the pathway model for the effect of self-efficacy on self-management ability in colorectal cancer patients with stoma.

Methods: A cross-sectional study was conducted from December 2022 to April 2023, with a convenience sample of 422 colorectal cancer patients with stoma at six tertiary grade A hospitals in Shandong Province, China. Statistical analysis was undertaken using SPSS 26.0 and Amos 24.0 software. A pathway model based on individual and family self-management theories was developed and analyzed by collecting data through onsite survey and online survey.

Results: Chinese colorectal cancer patient's self-management ability score is 105.19 (17.19), which shows medium-level self-management ability. The self-efficacy of colorectal cancer patients with a stoma is influenced by social support, which ultimately leads to changes in their self-management ability.

Conclusion: The findings may help healthcare professionals to identify the factors that influence self-management skills of colorectal cancer patients with stoma and provide a basis for developing interventions.

Purpose: The purpose of this study is to examine fluctuations in stress, social support, and decisional conflict among surrogates during the admission and discharge phases of intensive care unit (ICU) patients with cancer. Additionally, this study seeks to identify the factors that influence changes in decisional conflict experienced by these surrogates.

Methods: This study involved surrogates of ICU patients with cancer. Data were collected within three days of ICU admission and during the discharge phase.

Results: The study included 115 surrogates of ICU patients with cancer. Following ICU discharge, the surrogates experienced a significant reduction in mean stress levels (t =  - 7.205; p < .001), improved family support (t = 3.748; p < .001), and decreased support from healthcare professionals (t =  - 3.286; p = .001). Younger surrogates, high-stress levels in surrogates, and low social support from healthcare professionals were associated with high decisional conflict. Stepwise multiple regression analysis indicated that surrogates' age, changes in stress, and changes in healthcare professionals' support explained 5%, 8%, and 16% of the variation in changes in decisional conflict, respectively.

Conclusions: To effectively reduce decisional conflict, particularly during the transition of patients with cancer from the ICU, a robust support system and comprehensive information on the treatment and prognosis of diseases in patients with cancer should be provided to younger surrogates. Healthcare professionals can facilitate family meetings and ensure comprehensive communication of the treatment plan. Practical guidance, social work assistance, timely clarification, and thorough information healthcare professionals provide can effectively mitigate decisional conflicts and enhance decision-making processes.

Purpose: The effects of aerobic exercise interventions for reducing fatigue after cancer treatment are well-established, and the effect of resistance training remains uncertain. Therefore, this systematic review and meta-analysis aim to analyze the effect of resistance training and combined resistance and endurance training on cancer-related fatigue (CRF) in breast cancer patients.

Methods: A systematic search for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) was conducted on the PubMed, SPORTDiscus, Embase, and Cochrane databases, focusing on the effect of supervised resistance training and combined supervised resistance and endurance training on CRF. Random-effect models were employed for calculating the standardized mean difference (SMD). Risk of bias was assessed with risk of bias 2 (RoB2), and certainty of evidence was judged according to the GRADE approach.

Results: A total of 9 RCTs with 1512 participants were included, and data from 866 participants in 8 RCTs were used for the meta-analysis. The risk of bias was deemed low in seven studies, while one study exhibited attrition bias, and one showed possible selection bias. Resistance training probably reduce the total fatigue (SMD= -0.30, 95% CI -0.52, -0.08, p=0.008), with individual studies showing small effects on physical and emotional CRF. A combined resistance and endurance training reduce total fatigue (SMD= -0.34, 95% CI -0.51, -0.17, p= 0.0001), with individual studies indicating moderate effects on physical fatigue, in daily life fatigue, and small effects on emotional and cognitive CRF.

Conclusion: Both supervised resistance training and combined resistance and endurance training have a small effect on total CRF. There is a trend towards an influence of intensity, with higher intensity potentially resulting in lower total CRF.

Background: Malnutrition is a significant risk for patients during cancer treatment. Neglecting to monitor or provide timely dietetic support can result in lower tolerance to treatments and reduced quality of life. This audit aimed to assess the completeness and accuracy of the documentation of anthropometric measurements in medical records and dietetic referral practices across four day-treatment units (DTUs) in England.

Methodology: Data were collected from electronic patient records of 100 patients in each DTU attending for systemic anti-cancer treatment (SACT) over a 2-week period. Data collected included patients' demographics, anthropometric data, referrals to dietitians, and whether the patients referred had a MUST score ≥ 2, which was calculated by the authors.

Results: Findings revealed that weights and heights were documented for 58-85% and 94-98% of patients attending DTUs, respectively. On average, 55% (range of 7-85%) of patients had their body mass index (BMI) documented on the day of SACT. The Malnutrition Universal Screening Tool (MUST) was rarely completed (≤ 3% in each centre). Dietetic referral practices varied across centres.

Conclusions: Findings highlight the need to improve anthropometric documentation practices in cancer centres, in order to allow better monitoring of malnutrition risk and early nutritional support interventions when needed.

Purpose: Kinesiophobia refers to an irrational fear of physical activities or functional exercise due to the fear of pain or reinjury. Cancer patients who undergo esophagectomy are prone to developing kinesiophobia, which adversely affects their disease prognosis and quality of life. Somatic symptoms are closely related to kinesiophobia, but the mechanisms underlying this relationship remain unclear. Therefore, the current study aimed to explore the chain-mediation roles of intrusive rumination and avoidant coping in the relationship between somatic symptoms and kinesiophobia in cancer patients who underwent esophagectomy.

Methods: A cross-sectional study was conducted in China from February 2023 to December 2023. A total of 279 postesophagectomy cancer patients were evaluated using the Symptom Check List 90 (SCL-90), Event Related Rumination Inventory (ERRI), Medical Coping Modes Questionnaire (MCMQ), and Tampa Scale of Kinesiophobia (TSK-11).

Results: Kinesiophobia was significantly positively correlated with somatic symptoms, intrusive rumination, and avoidant coping (p < 0.001). Somatic symptoms had a direct association with kinesiophobia (β = 0.280, 95% CI (0.200, 0.360), p < 0.001). Furthermore, our model showed that somatic symptoms had a significant indirect association with kinesiophobia through the separate mediating effects of intrusive rumination (β = 0.204, 95% CI (0.145, 0.267), p < 0.001) and avoidant coping (β = 0.049, 95% CI (0.019, 0.088), p < 0.001), as well as through the chain-mediated effects of intrusive rumination-avoidant coping (β = 0.026, 95% CI (0.012, 0.044), p < 0.001).

Conclusions: The findings of this study suggested that intrusive rumination and avoidant coping play separate and chain-mediated roles in the relationship between somatic symptoms and kinesiophobia in postesophagectomy cancer patients.

Purpose: To estimate the association between a previous cancer diagnosis and healthcare use during the COVID-19 pandemic among Europeans and Israelis individuals.

Methods: This cross-sectional study was based on data from the Survey of Health, Ageing and Retirement in Europe (SHARE), including the SHARE COVID-19 Survey, which was conducted in the summer of 2020, in 27 countries. Cancer survivors (CS, n = 6409) were country-, sex-, age-, and education-matched (1:2) to non-cancer individuals (NC). Adjusted odds ratios (OR) and 95% confidence intervals (95%CI) were computed using logistic regression.

Results: Overall, CS were more likely to refer that they forwent medical appointments due to fear of COVID-19 (OR = 1.29, 95%CI 1.19-1.41) than NC, particularly those who lived with their partner and other relatives (OR = 1.79, 95%CI 1.39-2.30). Likewise, CS had their medical appointments postponed more often (OR = 1.54, 95%CI 1.44-1.64); this association was stronger among CS who lived with their partner and other relatives (OR = 1.96, 95%CI 1.63-2.36) who reported higher economic difficulties (OR = 1.73, 95%CI 1.50-2.00) and those with no multimorbidity (OR = 1.85, 95%CI 1.62-2.11). CS were also more likely to refer that they were unable to book an appointment (OR = 1.43, 95%CI 1.26-1.63), particularly those who reported that a person close to them died due to COVID-19 (OR = 2.72, 95%CI 1.47-5.01).

Conclusion: CS were more likely to forgo medical treatment, report healthcare postponements, and be unable to book an appointment than NC, which highlights the importance of closely monitoring the long-term impact of the COVID-19 pandemic along the cancer care continuum.

Context: The use of methadone for cancer pain management is gaining wider acceptance. However, switching to methadone treatment can still pose challenges. Consequently, there is ongoing development of its use in low doses in combination with other opioids, despite a lack of clinical evidence regarding its efficacy and safety.

Objectives: This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy and tolerability of low-dose methadone in combination with another opioid in patients with moderate-to-severe cancer-related pain in a clinical setting.

Patients and methods: This was a prospective, open-label study conducted in 19 pain and/or palliative care centres treating patients with cancer-related pain. Pain intensity, patients' global impression of change, and adverse effects were assessed on day 7 and day 14. The main outcome measure was the proportion of responders.

Results: The study included 92 patients. The daily dose of methadone was 3 [3-6] mg at baseline, 9 [4-10] mg on day 7 and 10 [6-15] mg on day 14. The NRS pain ratings significantly decreased from 7 [6-8] at baseline to 5 [3-6] on visit 2 (p < .0001) and 4 [3-6] on visit 3 (p < .0001). Similarly, the VRS pain ratings decreased from 3 [3-3] at baseline to 2 [2-3] on visit 2 (p = 0.026) and 2 [1-3] (p < 0.001) on visit 3. At Visits 1 and 2, half of the patients were considered Responders. Of those responders, 73.5% were High-Responders at Visit 1 and 58.7% were High-Responders at Visit 2. No adverse events related to the risk of QT prolongation, overdose, or drug interactions were reported.

Conclusion: For patients experiencing moderate to severe cancer-related pain despite initial opioid treatment, our study found that low-dose methadone, when used in combination with another opioid, was both safe and effective. This supports the use of methadone as an adjunct to opioid-based treatment for cancer pain.

Objective: This study analyzes symptoms in lung cancer patients undergoing immunotherapy to identify core symptom clusters through network analysis and lay a foundation for effective symptom management programs.

Methods: The sample comprised 240 lung cancer patients receiving immunotherapy. Participants were assessed using the Memorial Symptom Assessment Scale. Exploratory factor analysis was used to extract symptom clusters, and network analysis using JASP 0.17.3 was performed to explore the centrality indices and density of the symptom network.

Results: Five symptom clusters were identified, i.e., emotion-related, lung cancer-related, physical, skin, and neural symptom clusters, with a cumulative variance contribution rate of 55.819%. Network analysis revealed that sadness was the most intense symptom (r_s = 2.189), dizziness was the most central symptom (r_c = 1.388), and fatigue was the most significant bridging symptom (r_b = 2.575).

Conclusion: This study identified five symptom clusters and a symptom network among lung cancer patients during immunotherapy. The network analysis's centrality indices and network density results can assist healthcare professionals in devising more precise symptom management strategies.

Purpose: To assess whether health-related quality of life (HRQOL) improved through a postmastectomy care program focused on breast cancer-related lymphedema (BCRL) protection/awareness.

Methods: Postoperative breast cancer patients were enrolled prospectively (February-2018 to September-2019) at Nursing and Obstetrics Faculty, Durango, Mexico. Sociodemographic/clinical characteristics, arm measurements, and HRQOL evaluation with Functional Assessment Cancer Therapy-Breast Cancer were collected at baseline and after six follow-up assessments between six-to-twelve-month postmastectomy. Lymphedema was verified through circometry. Descriptive analysis and McNemar-Bowker test were used to evaluate paired differences in HRQOL. Subgroup analysis was conducted to assess sociodemographic/clinical characteristics of BCRL using Pearson's chi-squared or Fisher exact test along with odds ratios (OR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI). All tests were two-sided with P-values < 0.05 considered statistically significant.

Results: One-hundred-two patients developed BCRL (incidence 66.2%, n = 154). All dimensions of HRQOL improved after the postmastectomy care program (P < 0.05). The subgroup analysis indicated that elementary academic degree (OR = 2.40, 95%CI: 1.01-5.69), laborer (OR = 9.85, 95%CI: 3.30-29.3), and total mastectomy (OR = 4.23, 95%CI: 1.20-14.9) were more associated with BCRL (P < 0.05). Conversely, high school academic degree (OR = 0.46, 95%CI: 0.22-0.94), married status (OR = 0.42, 95%CI: 0.21-0.86), housewife (OR = 0.27, 95%CI: 0.12-0.61), professional occupation (OR = 0.10, 95%CI: 0.01-0.64), and having no comorbidities (OR = 0.31, 95%CI: 0.15-0.63) were less associated with BCRL (P < 0.05).

Conclusion: Although HRQOL improved through the postmastectomy care program, our findings suggest that lower education, working as a laborer, and total mastectomy may be more associated with BCRL. Continuing research may uncover liabilities among BCRL patients within limited-resources settings.

Purpose: Infectious and other complications can necessitate admission to the intensive care unit (ICU) in autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT). Data on need for ICU care, impact of various pre- and peri-transplant characteristics on requirement of ICU care and outcomes are scarce from the developing world.

Methods: A retrospective case record review of ASCT cases was conducted. Pre- and peri-transplant characteristics like infection within 4 weeks of transplant, mucositis, surveillance culture positivity, peri-transplant infections, comorbidity, and time to neutrophil and platelet engraftment were noted.

Results: A total of 109 patients underwent 109 ASCTs. Most common diagnosis was the plasma cell disorder in 75 (69%) patients. Forty-eight (45%) patients had peri-transplant infections. Fifteen (14%) patients had infections with multi-drug resistant (MDR) organisms. Fifteen (14%) patients required ICU care, the most common reason being hypotension in nine patients (8.3%). Four patients (3.7%) required non-invasive ventilation, and one (0.9%) required invasive ventilation. Mortality rate was 1.8% (two patients). Factors associated with the need for ICU care were time to platelet engraftment (median 15 days among those required ICU care versus 13 days who did not, p = 0.04) and presence of peri-transplant infection showed a trend toward ICU care need (19% among those required ICU care versus 7% in those who did not, p = 0.05).

Conclusion: Delayed platelet engraftment was associated with the need for ICU care and peri-transplant infections were associated with a trend toward need for ICU care.