Pub Date : 2026-02-12DOI: 10.1007/s00520-026-10395-6
Sophie Pauge, Andrea Züger, Luise Richter, Viktoria Mathies, Bastian Surmann, Thomas Ernst, Natalja Menold, Wolfgang Greiner, Eva C Winkler, Katja Mehlis
Purpose: A conceptualisation of subjective financial distress as a consequence of a cancer diagnosis and treatment is still missing due to a lack of a comprehensive model accounting for all relevant dimensions of financial effects of cancer experienced by patients. Our goal was to derive a model for the German healthcare system to shed light on the complex process of financial effects of cancer.
Methods: The model was developed through systematic literature review and qualitative studies, including interviews with 18 cancer patients and a focus group with 4 social services representatives. The iterative process of model development was accompanied by an ongoing exchange in the interdisciplinary research team.
Results: The developed model of financial effects of cancer experienced by patients consists of three dimensions: (1) actual and anticipated financial disadvantages, (2) behavioural and cognitive coping strategies, and (3) subjective financial distress conceptualised as negative effects in different aspects of daily living: employment, living situation, family, social participation, health promoting lifestyle, additional personally preferred treatments, navigating the health system, and a further area so-called unspecific.
Conclusion: Subjective financial distress is driven by different financial effects of cancer experienced by patients and is perceived as negative in various aspects of daily living. While the identified categories of daily living can be observed in countries with universal healthcare coverage, the content and degree of each subcategory depend on country-specific characteristics. The introduced model can be used to inform the development of a new patient-reported outcome measure (PROM).
{"title":"Towards the assessment of financial distress among cancer patients: a conceptual model of the financial effects of a tumour disease.","authors":"Sophie Pauge, Andrea Züger, Luise Richter, Viktoria Mathies, Bastian Surmann, Thomas Ernst, Natalja Menold, Wolfgang Greiner, Eva C Winkler, Katja Mehlis","doi":"10.1007/s00520-026-10395-6","DOIUrl":"10.1007/s00520-026-10395-6","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>A conceptualisation of subjective financial distress as a consequence of a cancer diagnosis and treatment is still missing due to a lack of a comprehensive model accounting for all relevant dimensions of financial effects of cancer experienced by patients. Our goal was to derive a model for the German healthcare system to shed light on the complex process of financial effects of cancer.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The model was developed through systematic literature review and qualitative studies, including interviews with 18 cancer patients and a focus group with 4 social services representatives. The iterative process of model development was accompanied by an ongoing exchange in the interdisciplinary research team.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The developed model of financial effects of cancer experienced by patients consists of three dimensions: (1) actual and anticipated financial disadvantages, (2) behavioural and cognitive coping strategies, and (3) subjective financial distress conceptualised as negative effects in different aspects of daily living: employment, living situation, family, social participation, health promoting lifestyle, additional personally preferred treatments, navigating the health system, and a further area so-called unspecific.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Subjective financial distress is driven by different financial effects of cancer experienced by patients and is perceived as negative in various aspects of daily living. While the identified categories of daily living can be observed in countries with universal healthcare coverage, the content and degree of each subcategory depend on country-specific characteristics. The introduced model can be used to inform the development of a new patient-reported outcome measure (PROM).</p><p><strong>Trial registration number: </strong>NCT05319925 (registration date, 2022-06-01).</p>","PeriodicalId":22046,"journal":{"name":"Supportive Care in Cancer","volume":"34 3","pages":"190"},"PeriodicalIF":3.0,"publicationDate":"2026-02-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12901272/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"146166939","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2026-02-11DOI: 10.1007/s00520-026-10424-4
Nese Altınok Ersoy, Esra Atakul, Imatullah Akyar
Purpose: Hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) is a physically and psychosocially complex process for patients and their families, and nurses play a key role in coordinating patient care. This study aimed to explore nurses' perspectives on caregiver engagement in the care of patients undergoing hematopoietic stem cell transplantation.
Methods: A qualitative descriptive design with purposive sampling was used. Data were collected through semi-structured interviews with eleven nurses working in a bone marrow transplantation unit in Ankara. The data were analyzed using thematic analysis.
Results: Five main themes and ten sub-themes were identified. The main themes were 1) Nurses' expectations and caregiver involvement, 2) Impact of caregiver's engagement, 3) Caregiver strain and challenges, 4) Support needs of caregivers, and 5) Nurses' role in supporting caregivers.
Conclusions: Nurses perceived that caregiver engagement positively improves patient outcomes but also noted that this placed a significant burden on caregivers. Nurses play a pivotal role in addressing the challenges and supporting caregivers through emotional support, education, and advocacy. Targeted interventions, such as education, psychological support, and enhanced communication, are crucial for supporting caregivers effectively and improving the well-being of both caregivers and patients.
{"title":"Nurses' perspectives on caregiver engagement in hematopoietic stem cell transplantation: A qualitative study.","authors":"Nese Altınok Ersoy, Esra Atakul, Imatullah Akyar","doi":"10.1007/s00520-026-10424-4","DOIUrl":"10.1007/s00520-026-10424-4","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) is a physically and psychosocially complex process for patients and their families, and nurses play a key role in coordinating patient care. This study aimed to explore nurses' perspectives on caregiver engagement in the care of patients undergoing hematopoietic stem cell transplantation.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A qualitative descriptive design with purposive sampling was used. Data were collected through semi-structured interviews with eleven nurses working in a bone marrow transplantation unit in Ankara. The data were analyzed using thematic analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Five main themes and ten sub-themes were identified. The main themes were 1) Nurses' expectations and caregiver involvement, 2) Impact of caregiver's engagement, 3) Caregiver strain and challenges, 4) Support needs of caregivers, and 5) Nurses' role in supporting caregivers.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Nurses perceived that caregiver engagement positively improves patient outcomes but also noted that this placed a significant burden on caregivers. Nurses play a pivotal role in addressing the challenges and supporting caregivers through emotional support, education, and advocacy. Targeted interventions, such as education, psychological support, and enhanced communication, are crucial for supporting caregivers effectively and improving the well-being of both caregivers and patients.</p>","PeriodicalId":22046,"journal":{"name":"Supportive Care in Cancer","volume":"34 3","pages":"183"},"PeriodicalIF":3.0,"publicationDate":"2026-02-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12894185/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"146158570","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2026-02-11DOI: 10.1007/s00520-026-10413-7
Elizabeth S Ver Hoeve, Patrick Wightman, Elizabeth Calhoun, Monica Hernandez, Julie S Armin, Heidi A Hamann
Purpose: Patient navigation programs have demonstrated intervention efficacy associated with barrier reduction and health outcome improvements in the context of cancer care. Greater characterization of barriers and barrier resolution likelihoods may support program optimization.
Methods: A 3-month longitudinal, non-comparative community-focused (i.e., lay navigator) patient navigation program was implemented at an NCI-designed cancer center between 2018 and 2021. Barriers to cancer care were reported by patients (n = 207) at pre-intervention and re-assessed at post-intervention. Descriptive analyses examined patient-level associations among pre-intervention barriers and post-intervention rates of barrier resolution. Logistic regressions were conducted at the barrier level and patient level to estimate the likelihood of barrier resolution associated with Health Access, Financial, and Psychosocial barrier domains.
Results: Participants reported an average of 3.54 distinct barriers to cancer care. Barriers associated with Health Access and Financial domains were most frequently endorsed. Post-navigation, barriers were found to differ in their resolution rates. At the barrier domain level, resolution rates differed significantly (X2(2) = 7.826, p = 0.02), with Financial barriers significantly less likely (OR = 0.61; 95% CI = 0.41, 0.89) to be resolved. For participants who reported barriers exclusively within the Financial domain, the odds of any of their barriers being "resolved" were approximately 77% lower compared to participants who reported barriers in other domains.
Conclusion: In this community-focused patient navigation program, barriers in the Financial domain proved to be the most difficult to resolve. The amenability of specific barriers to resolution via patient navigation can guide program tailoring and optimization.
目的:在癌症治疗的背景下,患者导航程序已经证明了与屏障减少和健康结果改善相关的干预效果。更大的障碍表征和障碍解决可能性可能支持程序优化。方法:在2018年至2021年期间,在nci设计的癌症中心实施了为期3个月的纵向、非比较性社区(即非专业导航员)患者导航项目。患者(n = 207)在干预前报告了癌症治疗的障碍,并在干预后重新评估。描述性分析检查了干预前障碍和干预后障碍解决率之间的患者水平关联。在障碍水平和患者水平上进行了逻辑回归,以估计与健康获取、财务和心理障碍领域相关的障碍解决的可能性。结果:参与者平均报告了3.54种不同的癌症治疗障碍。与获得卫生保健和金融领域相关的障碍最常得到认可。导航后,发现障碍的解析率不同。在障碍域水平,解决率差异显著(X2(2) = 7.826, p = 0.02),金融障碍的解决率显著较低(OR = 0.61; 95% CI = 0.41, 0.89)。对于那些只在金融领域报告障碍的参与者,他们的任何障碍被“解决”的几率比在其他领域报告障碍的参与者低约77%。结论:在这个以社区为中心的病人导航项目中,金融领域的障碍被证明是最难解决的。通过患者导航解决特定障碍的适应性可以指导程序的剪裁和优化。
{"title":"Barrier resolution via patient navigation in the context of cancer care.","authors":"Elizabeth S Ver Hoeve, Patrick Wightman, Elizabeth Calhoun, Monica Hernandez, Julie S Armin, Heidi A Hamann","doi":"10.1007/s00520-026-10413-7","DOIUrl":"10.1007/s00520-026-10413-7","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Patient navigation programs have demonstrated intervention efficacy associated with barrier reduction and health outcome improvements in the context of cancer care. Greater characterization of barriers and barrier resolution likelihoods may support program optimization.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A 3-month longitudinal, non-comparative community-focused (i.e., lay navigator) patient navigation program was implemented at an NCI-designed cancer center between 2018 and 2021. Barriers to cancer care were reported by patients (n = 207) at pre-intervention and re-assessed at post-intervention. Descriptive analyses examined patient-level associations among pre-intervention barriers and post-intervention rates of barrier resolution. Logistic regressions were conducted at the barrier level and patient level to estimate the likelihood of barrier resolution associated with Health Access, Financial, and Psychosocial barrier domains.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Participants reported an average of 3.54 distinct barriers to cancer care. Barriers associated with Health Access and Financial domains were most frequently endorsed. Post-navigation, barriers were found to differ in their resolution rates. At the barrier domain level, resolution rates differed significantly (X<sup>2</sup>(2) = 7.826, p = 0.02), with Financial barriers significantly less likely (OR = 0.61; 95% CI = 0.41, 0.89) to be resolved. For participants who reported barriers exclusively within the Financial domain, the odds of any of their barriers being \"resolved\" were approximately 77% lower compared to participants who reported barriers in other domains.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>In this community-focused patient navigation program, barriers in the Financial domain proved to be the most difficult to resolve. The amenability of specific barriers to resolution via patient navigation can guide program tailoring and optimization.</p>","PeriodicalId":22046,"journal":{"name":"Supportive Care in Cancer","volume":"34 3","pages":"181"},"PeriodicalIF":3.0,"publicationDate":"2026-02-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12894194/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"146158550","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Purpose: To determine the feasibility and effectiveness of two forms of social support (peer and peer plus virtual professional support) on quality of life, feelings of support, and exercise levels in older adult survivors of cancer.
Methods: We conducted a pilot randomized controlled trial. Participants were randomized to the AgeMatchPLUS (peer support plus weekly qualified exercise professional support) or AgeMatch (peer support only) group. The primary outcome was feasibility (measured by recruitment, retention, adherence rates). Secondary outcomes included quality of life, social support, exercise volume, and physical activity enjoyment. Outcomes were measured at baseline (T1), post-intervention (10-weeks post baseline (T2)), post-tapering (14-weeks post baseline (T3)), and at 6-months follow-up (T4). Data was analyzed using descriptive statistics and a multiple linear regression was performed for all secondary outcomes to determine estimates of effect between groups.
Results: Virtual peer and professional exercise-related social support are feasible for older adults survivors of cancer. Those matched with a peer in addition to virtual professional support demonstrated improved exercise-related social support and resistance training volume post-intervention. No other significant differences were found between groups, with both groups significantly increasing their exercise levels across the study.
Conclusion: We demonstrated the feasibility and benefit of peer matching, both independently and alongside professional support, for older survivors of cancer. Future research efforts should examine the effectiveness of this intervention on a larger scale and compare outcomes to a no intervention group.
Registry: This trial was registered on clinicaltrials.gov (NCT05549479, August 23, 2022).
{"title":"A pilot randomized controlled trial comparing the feasibility and preliminary effects of different forms of exercise-related social support for older adult survivors of cancer.","authors":"Jenna Smith-Turchyn, Susanne Sinclair, Erin O'Loughlin, Anthea Innes, Julie Richardson, Stuart Pillips, Marla Beauchamp, Lehana Thabane, Carsten Wrosch, Catherine M Sabiston","doi":"10.1007/s00520-026-10366-x","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00520-026-10366-x","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To determine the feasibility and effectiveness of two forms of social support (peer and peer plus virtual professional support) on quality of life, feelings of support, and exercise levels in older adult survivors of cancer.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a pilot randomized controlled trial. Participants were randomized to the AgeMatchPLUS (peer support plus weekly qualified exercise professional support) or AgeMatch (peer support only) group. The primary outcome was feasibility (measured by recruitment, retention, adherence rates). Secondary outcomes included quality of life, social support, exercise volume, and physical activity enjoyment. Outcomes were measured at baseline (T1), post-intervention (10-weeks post baseline (T2)), post-tapering (14-weeks post baseline (T3)), and at 6-months follow-up (T4). Data was analyzed using descriptive statistics and a multiple linear regression was performed for all secondary outcomes to determine estimates of effect between groups.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Virtual peer and professional exercise-related social support are feasible for older adults survivors of cancer. Those matched with a peer in addition to virtual professional support demonstrated improved exercise-related social support and resistance training volume post-intervention. No other significant differences were found between groups, with both groups significantly increasing their exercise levels across the study.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>We demonstrated the feasibility and benefit of peer matching, both independently and alongside professional support, for older survivors of cancer. Future research efforts should examine the effectiveness of this intervention on a larger scale and compare outcomes to a no intervention group.</p><p><strong>Registry: </strong>This trial was registered on clinicaltrials.gov (NCT05549479, August 23, 2022).</p>","PeriodicalId":22046,"journal":{"name":"Supportive Care in Cancer","volume":"34 3","pages":"186"},"PeriodicalIF":3.0,"publicationDate":"2026-02-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"146166887","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Purpose: This study used contemporaneous networks and cross-lagged panel network (CLPN) to examine how the Simplified Sitting Badunjin (SSBDJ) intervention interacted with the fatigue, sleep disturbances, and quality of life (QoL) at different follow-up stages in advanced cancer patients.
Methods: This was a secondary analysis of a randomized controlled trial. Data were collected at baseline (T0), 4 weeks (T1), 8 weeks (T2), 12 weeks (T3) of the intervention, and 4 weeks (T4) after the intervention. A total of 3 constructs with 16 dimensions (fatigue severity, fatigue interference, sleep quality, sleep latency, sleep duration, habitual sleep efficiency, sleep disturbances, daytime dysfunction, physical discomfort, food related concerns, healthcare concerns, support, negative emotions, existential distress, sense of alienation, value of life) were included in the symptom network, which consists of contemporaneous and cross-lagged panel networks.
Results: A total of 175 participants were included in the network analysis. Within the contemporaneous network, "Fatigue interference" emerged as the central symptom in both the intervention and control groups (intervention group: EI value = 1.249 (T1), 2.610 (T2); control group: EI value = 1.462 (T1), 1.950 (T2)). In the longitudinal network analysis, SSBDJ was strongly negatively associated with fatigue severity and interference at T0 → T1 (β = -0.497, -0.504) and T1 → T2 (β = -0.210, -0.256). Additionally, fatigue consistently served as a central node within the networks, demonstrating the highest out-expected influence across 12-week intervention period. The impact of fatigue (out-EI: r = 2.641) on sleep disturbances and quality of life tended to exert independent influence in the mid stage of intervention (T2 → T3). Furthermore, fatigue (out-predictability: r = 1.993) remained a dominant predictor of sleep disturbances and quality of life even after the intervention (T3 → T4).
Conclusion: This study enhances the understanding of the longitudinal relationships between the SSBDJ intervention, fatigue, sleep disturbances, and QoL among patients with advanced cancer. It could provide an important insight for designing precise symptom management strategies in mind-body exercise interventions among this population.
{"title":"Mechanisms of simplified sitting Badunjin effects on symptom burden: a network-based cross-lagged analysis in advanced cancer patients.","authors":"Jianwei Zheng, Huina Zou, Yuanfeng Lu, Liangying Chen, Meihua Zheng, Zheng Zhu, Wan Cheng, Huimin Xiao","doi":"10.1007/s00520-026-10410-w","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00520-026-10410-w","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>This study used contemporaneous networks and cross-lagged panel network (CLPN) to examine how the Simplified Sitting Badunjin (SSBDJ) intervention interacted with the fatigue, sleep disturbances, and quality of life (QoL) at different follow-up stages in advanced cancer patients.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This was a secondary analysis of a randomized controlled trial. Data were collected at baseline (T0), 4 weeks (T1), 8 weeks (T2), 12 weeks (T3) of the intervention, and 4 weeks (T4) after the intervention. A total of 3 constructs with 16 dimensions (fatigue severity, fatigue interference, sleep quality, sleep latency, sleep duration, habitual sleep efficiency, sleep disturbances, daytime dysfunction, physical discomfort, food related concerns, healthcare concerns, support, negative emotions, existential distress, sense of alienation, value of life) were included in the symptom network, which consists of contemporaneous and cross-lagged panel networks.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 175 participants were included in the network analysis. Within the contemporaneous network, \"Fatigue interference\" emerged as the central symptom in both the intervention and control groups (intervention group: EI value = 1.249 (T1), 2.610 (T2); control group: EI value = 1.462 (T1), 1.950 (T2)). In the longitudinal network analysis, SSBDJ was strongly negatively associated with fatigue severity and interference at T0 → T1 (β = -0.497, -0.504) and T1 → T2 (β = -0.210, -0.256). Additionally, fatigue consistently served as a central node within the networks, demonstrating the highest out-expected influence across 12-week intervention period. The impact of fatigue (out-EI: r = 2.641) on sleep disturbances and quality of life tended to exert independent influence in the mid stage of intervention (T2 → T3). Furthermore, fatigue (out-predictability: r = 1.993) remained a dominant predictor of sleep disturbances and quality of life even after the intervention (T3 → T4).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This study enhances the understanding of the longitudinal relationships between the SSBDJ intervention, fatigue, sleep disturbances, and QoL among patients with advanced cancer. It could provide an important insight for designing precise symptom management strategies in mind-body exercise interventions among this population.</p>","PeriodicalId":22046,"journal":{"name":"Supportive Care in Cancer","volume":"34 3","pages":"182"},"PeriodicalIF":3.0,"publicationDate":"2026-02-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"146158537","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Purpose: In the last days of life, saying good-bye between terminally ill patients and their family members-sharing meaningful final conversations-is considered a core element of a good death. However, the role of healthcare professionals in facilitating this process remains insufficiently examined. This study aimed to assess bereaved family members' perceptions of (1) the achievement of saying good-bye and (2) the appropriateness of support timing.
Methods: This nationwide cross-sectional survey included bereaved family members of cancer patients who died in inpatient hospices or palliative care units in Japan. Families evaluated two outcomes and ten professional practices. Exploratory factor analysis identified practice domains, and multivariate logistic regression examined their associations with the outcomes.
Results: Of 954 questionnaires distributed, 683 were returned (71.5%), and 384 were analyzed. Among respondents, 17.5% disagreed that they had been able to say good-bye, and 12.4% felt support was provided too late. Four professional practice domains were identified. "Clarifying the patient's estimated prognosis" was significantly associated with all outcomes. Furthermore, "Encourage families to say good-bye not to miss the moment to talk" was associated with family-perceived achievement of saying good-bye with marginal statistical significance (p = 0.054).
Conclusions: Clear and timely prognostic communication may help patients convey meaningful last words to their families.
{"title":"Saying good-bye or final conversations between terminally ill inpatients and family members in the last weeks of life: a nationwide survey of bereaved families.","authors":"Hiroyuki Otani, Tatsuya Morita, Maho Aoyama, Satoru Tsuneto, Masanori Mori, Mitsunori Miyashita","doi":"10.1007/s00520-026-10417-3","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00520-026-10417-3","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>In the last days of life, saying good-bye between terminally ill patients and their family members-sharing meaningful final conversations-is considered a core element of a good death. However, the role of healthcare professionals in facilitating this process remains insufficiently examined. This study aimed to assess bereaved family members' perceptions of (1) the achievement of saying good-bye and (2) the appropriateness of support timing.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This nationwide cross-sectional survey included bereaved family members of cancer patients who died in inpatient hospices or palliative care units in Japan. Families evaluated two outcomes and ten professional practices. Exploratory factor analysis identified practice domains, and multivariate logistic regression examined their associations with the outcomes.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of 954 questionnaires distributed, 683 were returned (71.5%), and 384 were analyzed. Among respondents, 17.5% disagreed that they had been able to say good-bye, and 12.4% felt support was provided too late. Four professional practice domains were identified. \"Clarifying the patient's estimated prognosis\" was significantly associated with all outcomes. Furthermore, \"Encourage families to say good-bye not to miss the moment to talk\" was associated with family-perceived achievement of saying good-bye with marginal statistical significance (p = 0.054).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Clear and timely prognostic communication may help patients convey meaningful last words to their families.</p>","PeriodicalId":22046,"journal":{"name":"Supportive Care in Cancer","volume":"34 3","pages":"184"},"PeriodicalIF":3.0,"publicationDate":"2026-02-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"146158573","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Purpose: Depression and anxiety are often undertreated in patients with cancer, and brief, robust screening measures are needed. The objective was to assess the sensitivity and specificity of the Edmonton Symptom Assessment System-Revised (ESAS-r) anxiety and depression items against the Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ-9) and the Generalized Anxiety Disorder 7-item scale (GAD-7) (reference measures).
Methods: We conducted a analysis of baseline data from the evaluation of a real-world patient-reported outcome measure (PROM) screening program. Patients with cancer completed the ESAS-r, PHQ-9, and GAD-7. Receiver operating characteristic analysis assessed ESAS-r depression and anxiety item accuracy by calculating area under the curve (AUC) and 95% confidence intervals (95% CI). Youden's index guided suggested screening cutoffs. Analyses were conducted for the entire sample, followed by exploratory analyses stratified by sex, age, income, and education.
Results: Of 375 eligible participants, 177 with complete data were included. The AUCs were excellent against the reference measures: 0.81 (95% CI: 0.73-0.90) for depression and 0.83 (95% CI: 0.70-0.96) for anxiety. Optimal cutoffs were ≥ 2 for depression (sensitivity: 0.83, specificity: 0.66) and ≥ 4 for anxiety (sensitivity: 0.83, specificity: 0.79), with low positive predictive values (0.32 and 0.31, respectively). Exploratory stratified analyses suggested comparable performance across subgroups, anxiety prevalence in males (2%) was too low for meaningful analysis.
Conclusion: The AUCs for the depression and anxiety ESAS-r items were excellent, at 0.81 and 0.83, respectively. Findings support ESAS-r-D ≥ 2 and ESAS-r-A ≥ 4 as thresholds to identify those in need of further assessment, but professional judgment and previous findings should also be considered.
{"title":"Standing the test of time: diagnostic accuracy of the Edmonton Symptom Assessment System-Revised (ESAS-r) for anxiety and depression screening.","authors":"Sylvie D Lambert, Alissa Moore, Eric Belzile, Zeev Rosberger, Marie-Ève Pelland, Tarek Hijal, Jeannie Haggerty, Lydia Ould Brahim, Fabienne Germeil, Moein Alizadeh, Joséphine Lemy-Dantica","doi":"10.1007/s00520-026-10383-w","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00520-026-10383-w","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Depression and anxiety are often undertreated in patients with cancer, and brief, robust screening measures are needed. The objective was to assess the sensitivity and specificity of the Edmonton Symptom Assessment System-Revised (ESAS-r) anxiety and depression items against the Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ-9) and the Generalized Anxiety Disorder 7-item scale (GAD-7) (reference measures).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a analysis of baseline data from the evaluation of a real-world patient-reported outcome measure (PROM) screening program. Patients with cancer completed the ESAS-r, PHQ-9, and GAD-7. Receiver operating characteristic analysis assessed ESAS-r depression and anxiety item accuracy by calculating area under the curve (AUC) and 95% confidence intervals (95% CI). Youden's index guided suggested screening cutoffs. Analyses were conducted for the entire sample, followed by exploratory analyses stratified by sex, age, income, and education.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of 375 eligible participants, 177 with complete data were included. The AUCs were excellent against the reference measures: 0.81 (95% CI: 0.73-0.90) for depression and 0.83 (95% CI: 0.70-0.96) for anxiety. Optimal cutoffs were ≥ 2 for depression (sensitivity: 0.83, specificity: 0.66) and ≥ 4 for anxiety (sensitivity: 0.83, specificity: 0.79), with low positive predictive values (0.32 and 0.31, respectively). Exploratory stratified analyses suggested comparable performance across subgroups, anxiety prevalence in males (2%) was too low for meaningful analysis.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The AUCs for the depression and anxiety ESAS-r items were excellent, at 0.81 and 0.83, respectively. Findings support ESAS-r-D ≥ 2 and ESAS-r-A ≥ 4 as thresholds to identify those in need of further assessment, but professional judgment and previous findings should also be considered.</p>","PeriodicalId":22046,"journal":{"name":"Supportive Care in Cancer","volume":"34 3","pages":"185"},"PeriodicalIF":3.0,"publicationDate":"2026-02-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"146166875","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Purpose: Exercise has the potential to improve and maintain physical function, alleviate symptoms, improve quality of life, and influence prognosis in patients with advanced lung cancer. This systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) primarily examined the impact of exercise on physical function, with a focus on cardiorespiratory fitness.
Methods: A systematic search of PubMed, Cochrane Library, Web of Science, and CINAHL was conducted from inception to June 28, 2024. Eligible RCTs examined exercise interventions in patients with advanced lung cancer, evaluating physical function, symptoms, quality of life, and prognosis. Subgroup analyses were performed based on measurement sites and items. Standardized mean differences (SMDs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated for quantitative outcomes, and a random-effects model was used for data pooling.
Results: Nine RCTs (from 4,262 retrieved articles) were included in the meta-analysis. The results indicated that patients who participated in exercise interventions had greater improvements in VO2peak (SMD 0.38; p = 0.01), muscle strength, and physical activity than those in the control group. Additionally, exercise was associated with greater reductions in fatigue and improvements in quality of life. Since only one study reported on prognosis, a meta-analysis could not be performed for this outcome.
Conclusions: We conclude that exercise plays a crucial role in improving cardiorespiratory fitness, muscle strength, quality of life, and fatigue in patients with advanced lung cancer, highlighting the importance of incorporating exercise into their cancer care. However, future studies, including head-to-head comparative trials, are required to clarify the effects of different exercise types and their impact on prognosis. PROSPERO Registration Number: CRD42024575482.
目的:运动具有改善和维持晚期肺癌患者身体功能、缓解症状、改善生活质量和影响预后的潜力。本系统综述和随机对照试验(rct)的荟萃分析主要研究了运动对身体功能的影响,重点是心肺健康。方法:系统检索PubMed、Cochrane Library、Web of Science和CINAHL自成立至2024年6月28日。符合条件的随机对照试验检查了晚期肺癌患者的运动干预,评估了身体功能、症状、生活质量和预后。根据测量地点和测量项目进行亚组分析。定量结果计算具有95%置信区间(ci)的标准化平均差(SMDs),并使用随机效应模型进行数据池。结果:9项随机对照试验(来自4262篇检索文章)被纳入meta分析。结果表明,与对照组相比,参加运动干预的患者在vo2峰值(SMD 0.38; p = 0.01)、肌肉力量和体力活动方面有更大的改善。此外,锻炼与疲劳的减少和生活质量的提高有关。由于只有一项研究报告了预后,因此无法对该结果进行荟萃分析。结论:我们得出结论,运动在改善晚期肺癌患者的心肺健康、肌肉力量、生活质量和疲劳方面起着至关重要的作用,强调了将运动纳入癌症护理的重要性。然而,未来的研究,包括头对头的比较试验,需要澄清不同运动类型的影响及其对预后的影响。普洛斯彼罗注册号:CRD42024575482。
{"title":"Effects of exercise on people living with advanced lung cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis.","authors":"Eisuke Ochi, Takuya Fukushima, Utae Katsushima, Takashi Yamashita, Jiro Nakano","doi":"10.1007/s00520-026-10431-5","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00520-026-10431-5","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Exercise has the potential to improve and maintain physical function, alleviate symptoms, improve quality of life, and influence prognosis in patients with advanced lung cancer. This systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) primarily examined the impact of exercise on physical function, with a focus on cardiorespiratory fitness.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A systematic search of PubMed, Cochrane Library, Web of Science, and CINAHL was conducted from inception to June 28, 2024. Eligible RCTs examined exercise interventions in patients with advanced lung cancer, evaluating physical function, symptoms, quality of life, and prognosis. Subgroup analyses were performed based on measurement sites and items. Standardized mean differences (SMDs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated for quantitative outcomes, and a random-effects model was used for data pooling.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Nine RCTs (from 4,262 retrieved articles) were included in the meta-analysis. The results indicated that patients who participated in exercise interventions had greater improvements in VO<sub>2</sub>peak (SMD 0.38; p = 0.01), muscle strength, and physical activity than those in the control group. Additionally, exercise was associated with greater reductions in fatigue and improvements in quality of life. Since only one study reported on prognosis, a meta-analysis could not be performed for this outcome.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>We conclude that exercise plays a crucial role in improving cardiorespiratory fitness, muscle strength, quality of life, and fatigue in patients with advanced lung cancer, highlighting the importance of incorporating exercise into their cancer care. However, future studies, including head-to-head comparative trials, are required to clarify the effects of different exercise types and their impact on prognosis. PROSPERO Registration Number: CRD42024575482.</p>","PeriodicalId":22046,"journal":{"name":"Supportive Care in Cancer","volume":"34 3","pages":"179"},"PeriodicalIF":3.0,"publicationDate":"2026-02-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"146150756","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Background: Virtual reality (VR) technology is increasingly being used in supportive care for cancer patients, aiming to improve their discomfort symptoms and enhance their health status and quality of life. Understanding patients' feedback and insights is crucial for improving the application of virtual reality among cancer patients. While numerous qualitative studies have examined the experiences and perspectives of cancer patients during their treatment with virtual reality, a comprehensive synthesis of these insights is missing. This review of qualitative evidence aimed to explore the experiences and perceptions of patients receiving VR therapy in cancer, providing guidance for the treatment and rehabilitation of cancer patients with VR technology.
Methods: A computerised search of the Cochrane Library, PubMed, Embase, CINAHL, Web of Science Core Collection, CNKI, Wanfang, Vip and SinoMed was conducted to identify relevant qualitative studies. The enrolled participants were adult patients with cancer who were 18 years of age or older. The search covered the period from establishing each database until May 2025. The Joanna Briggs Institute criteria for qualitative research were utilised to evaluate the quality of the studies. The data included in the literature were analyzed and integrated by "thematic synthesis" to formalize the identification and development of themes.
Results: A total of 12 studies were included, encompassing data from cancer patients with an age range of 20 to 83 years. Findings were integrated into 12 sub-themes and 4 themes: (1) experiences of cancer patients receiving VR therapy. (2) perceived benefits of VR therapy for cancer patients. (3) barriers to VR therapy for cancer patients. (4) needs and expectations of cancer patients receiving VR therapy. Each encompassed sub-themes.
Conclusion: While most patients develop a strong interest in VR therapy and are willing to try it, some cancer patients express doubts and resistance due to poor human-computer interaction experiences, discomfort such as nausea or dizziness, or economic factors. Participants reported that VR therapy may serve as an effective approach to alleviate patients' physical pain, relieve psychological stress, and promote the recovery process. Additionally, cancer patients receiving VR therapy face various barriers and have put forward some needs and preferences to better apply VR therapy. Future studies should be conducted according to patients' feedback and suggestions on how to further optimize and improve VR therapy.
Registration: PROSPERO CRD420251053989.
背景:虚拟现实(VR)技术越来越多地应用于癌症患者的支持性护理,旨在改善患者的不适症状,提高患者的健康状况和生活质量。了解患者的反馈和见解对于提高虚拟现实在癌症患者中的应用至关重要。虽然许多定性研究已经检查了癌症患者在虚拟现实治疗期间的经历和观点,但缺乏对这些见解的全面综合。本文通过对定性证据的回顾,旨在探讨癌症患者接受VR治疗的体验和认知,为癌症患者使用VR技术进行治疗和康复提供指导。方法:计算机检索Cochrane Library、PubMed、Embase、CINAHL、Web of Science Core Collection、中国知网(CNKI)、万方网(Wanfang)、维普网(Vip)和中国医学信息中心(SinoMed),确定相关的定性研究。入选的参与者是18岁或以上的成年癌症患者。搜索范围从建立每个数据库到2025年5月。乔安娜布里格斯研究所的定性研究标准被用来评估研究的质量。通过“主题综合”对文献中的数据进行分析和整合,使主题的识别和发展正规化。结果:共纳入了12项研究,包括年龄在20至83岁之间的癌症患者的数据。研究结果被整合到12个子主题和4个主题中:(1)癌症患者接受VR治疗的体验。(2)虚拟现实治疗对癌症患者的感知获益。(3)癌症患者VR治疗的障碍。(4)癌症患者接受VR治疗的需求与期望。每一个都包含分主题。结论:虽然大多数患者对VR治疗产生了浓厚的兴趣并愿意尝试,但由于人机交互体验差、恶心、头晕等不适或经济因素,部分癌症患者表现出怀疑和抗拒。参与者报告说,VR治疗可以作为一种有效的方法来减轻患者的身体疼痛,缓解心理压力,促进康复过程。此外,接受VR治疗的癌症患者面临各种障碍,为了更好地应用VR治疗,他们提出了一些需求和偏好。未来的研究应根据患者的反馈和建议,进一步优化和改进VR治疗。注册号:PROSPERO CRD420251053989。
{"title":"Experiences and perceptions of cancer patients receiving virtual reality therapy: a meta‑synthesis of qualitative research.","authors":"Jie Jing, Mohan Li, Xinyu Wang, Danruo Wang, Siying Bi, Qiuchen Zhu, Yehao Rui, Ling Yuan","doi":"10.1007/s00520-026-10321-w","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00520-026-10321-w","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Virtual reality (VR) technology is increasingly being used in supportive care for cancer patients, aiming to improve their discomfort symptoms and enhance their health status and quality of life. Understanding patients' feedback and insights is crucial for improving the application of virtual reality among cancer patients. While numerous qualitative studies have examined the experiences and perspectives of cancer patients during their treatment with virtual reality, a comprehensive synthesis of these insights is missing. This review of qualitative evidence aimed to explore the experiences and perceptions of patients receiving VR therapy in cancer, providing guidance for the treatment and rehabilitation of cancer patients with VR technology.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A computerised search of the Cochrane Library, PubMed, Embase, CINAHL, Web of Science Core Collection, CNKI, Wanfang, Vip and SinoMed was conducted to identify relevant qualitative studies. The enrolled participants were adult patients with cancer who were 18 years of age or older. The search covered the period from establishing each database until May 2025. The Joanna Briggs Institute criteria for qualitative research were utilised to evaluate the quality of the studies. The data included in the literature were analyzed and integrated by \"thematic synthesis\" to formalize the identification and development of themes.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 12 studies were included, encompassing data from cancer patients with an age range of 20 to 83 years. Findings were integrated into 12 sub-themes and 4 themes: (1) experiences of cancer patients receiving VR therapy. (2) perceived benefits of VR therapy for cancer patients. (3) barriers to VR therapy for cancer patients. (4) needs and expectations of cancer patients receiving VR therapy. Each encompassed sub-themes.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>While most patients develop a strong interest in VR therapy and are willing to try it, some cancer patients express doubts and resistance due to poor human-computer interaction experiences, discomfort such as nausea or dizziness, or economic factors. Participants reported that VR therapy may serve as an effective approach to alleviate patients' physical pain, relieve psychological stress, and promote the recovery process. Additionally, cancer patients receiving VR therapy face various barriers and have put forward some needs and preferences to better apply VR therapy. Future studies should be conducted according to patients' feedback and suggestions on how to further optimize and improve VR therapy.</p><p><strong>Registration: </strong>PROSPERO CRD420251053989.</p>","PeriodicalId":22046,"journal":{"name":"Supportive Care in Cancer","volume":"34 3","pages":"180"},"PeriodicalIF":3.0,"publicationDate":"2026-02-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"146150766","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2026-02-09DOI: 10.1007/s00520-026-10316-7
Lin Cai, Lisen Lin, Jing Xue, Sihan Sun, Qiaorui Chen, Yaoran Wang, Li Li, Yan Shen
Background: Chemotherapy-induced peripheral neuropathy (CIPN) is a prevalent adverse effect linked to neurotoxic chemotherapeutic agents. Current pharmacological treatments exhibit limited efficacy and notable adverse effects. The clinical effectiveness of non-pharmacological therapies, like acupuncture, physical exercise (PE), cryotherapy (CR), and compression therapy, requires systematic comparison. This study employs a network meta-analysis (NMA) to appraise the efficacy and preventive effects of various non-pharmacological interventions on CIPN.
Methods: The study adhered to the PRISMA guidelines. Eight Chinese and English databases (up to October 2025) were searched. A fixed-effect NMA was executed using Bayesian methods to appraise the effects of interventions like acupuncture, CR, and PE on the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy/Gynecologic Oncology Group-Neurotoxicity questionnaire, the Numerical Rating Scale, the European Organization of Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire-CIPN twenty-item scale, and the incidence of CIPN. Additionally, the risk of bias was appraised using the Cochrane tool.
Results: In total, 27 studies were included, comprising 2136 patients. The NMA indicated that, compared to medication, PE can effectively alleviate neurotoxicity (mean difference [MD]: - 9.9, 95% credible interval [CrI] [- 16, - 4.3]). Acupuncture exhibited superior efficacy in modulating peripheral nerve symptoms (MD: - 2.4, 95% CrI [- 3.8, - 1.1]), alleviating neuropathic pain (MD: - 1.1, 95% CrI [- 1.2, - 1.0]), and reducing the incidence of CIPN (MD: 0.23, 95% CrI [0.071, 0.52]).
Conclusion: PE can notably improve neurotoxicity. Acupuncture can alleviate clinical symptoms related to sensory and motor functions in CIPN. Additionally, it is effective in reducing neuropathic pain and might serve as a preventive measure against the onset of CIPN.
{"title":"Efficacy of non-pharmacological interventions for chemotherapy-induced peripheral neuropathy: a systematic review and network meta-analysis for randomized controlled trials.","authors":"Lin Cai, Lisen Lin, Jing Xue, Sihan Sun, Qiaorui Chen, Yaoran Wang, Li Li, Yan Shen","doi":"10.1007/s00520-026-10316-7","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00520-026-10316-7","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Chemotherapy-induced peripheral neuropathy (CIPN) is a prevalent adverse effect linked to neurotoxic chemotherapeutic agents. Current pharmacological treatments exhibit limited efficacy and notable adverse effects. The clinical effectiveness of non-pharmacological therapies, like acupuncture, physical exercise (PE), cryotherapy (CR), and compression therapy, requires systematic comparison. This study employs a network meta-analysis (NMA) to appraise the efficacy and preventive effects of various non-pharmacological interventions on CIPN.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The study adhered to the PRISMA guidelines. Eight Chinese and English databases (up to October 2025) were searched. A fixed-effect NMA was executed using Bayesian methods to appraise the effects of interventions like acupuncture, CR, and PE on the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy/Gynecologic Oncology Group-Neurotoxicity questionnaire, the Numerical Rating Scale, the European Organization of Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire-CIPN twenty-item scale, and the incidence of CIPN. Additionally, the risk of bias was appraised using the Cochrane tool.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In total, 27 studies were included, comprising 2136 patients. The NMA indicated that, compared to medication, PE can effectively alleviate neurotoxicity (mean difference [MD]: - 9.9, 95% credible interval [CrI] [- 16, - 4.3]). Acupuncture exhibited superior efficacy in modulating peripheral nerve symptoms (MD: - 2.4, 95% CrI [- 3.8, - 1.1]), alleviating neuropathic pain (MD: - 1.1, 95% CrI [- 1.2, - 1.0]), and reducing the incidence of CIPN (MD: 0.23, 95% CrI [0.071, 0.52]).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>PE can notably improve neurotoxicity. Acupuncture can alleviate clinical symptoms related to sensory and motor functions in CIPN. Additionally, it is effective in reducing neuropathic pain and might serve as a preventive measure against the onset of CIPN.</p>","PeriodicalId":22046,"journal":{"name":"Supportive Care in Cancer","volume":"34 3","pages":"174"},"PeriodicalIF":3.0,"publicationDate":"2026-02-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"146143567","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}