Supportive Care in Cancer最新文献

Purpose: To examine health-related quality of life (HRQoL) and supportive care needs among young adult (YA) cancer survivors up to 3 years post-diagnosis.

Methods: A national cohort of individuals diagnosed at 18-39 years with breast, cervical, ovarian, or testicular cancer, lymphoma or brain tumor was approached with surveys at 1.5 (n = 1010, response rate 67%) and 3 (n = 722) years post-diagnosis. HRQoL was measured using the EORTC QLQ-C30. Scores were dichotomized using cut-off scores to predict supportive care needs in the Supportive Care Needs Survey-Long Form 59 (SCNS-LF59). Swedish cancer quality registers provided clinical data. Factors predicting need of support at 1.5 and 3 years post-diagnosis were identified using logistic regression.

Results: HRQoL improvements over time were trivial to small. At both time points, a majority of respondents rated HRQoL levels indicating supportive care needs. At 1.5 years post-diagnosis, the risk of having support needs was lower among survivors with testicular cancer (compared to lymphoma) or university-level education, and higher among those on treatment (predominantly endocrine therapy). At 3 years post-diagnosis, when controlling for previous HRQoL scores, most correlations persisted, and poor self-rated household economy and chronic health conditions were additionally associated with supportive care needs.

Conclusion: A majority of YAs diagnosed with cancer rate HRQoL at levels indicating support needs up to 3 years post-diagnosis. Testicular cancer survivors are at lower risk of having support needs. Concurrent health conditions and poor finances are linked to lower HRQoL. More efforts are needed to provide adequate, age-appropriate support to YA cancer survivors.

Purpose: Few digital interventions target patients with advanced cancer. Hence, we feasibility-tested Finding My Way-Advanced (FMW-A), a self-guided program for women with metastatic breast cancer.

Methods: A single-site randomised controlled pilot trial was conducted. Participants were recruited through clinicians, professional networks, and social media and randomised to intervention or usual-care control. Participants were randomly allocated to either the intervention (FMW-A; a 6-week, 6-module CBT-based online self-directed psychosocial program for women with MBC + usual care resources) or control (usual care resources: BCNA's Hope and Hurdles kit). Feasibility outcomes included rates of recruitment, uptake, engagement, and attrition. Distress, QOL, and unmet needs were evaluated for signals of efficacy, and qualitative feedback was collected to assess acceptability.

Results: Due to COVID-19 and funding constraints, the target recruitment of 40 was not reached (n = 60 approached; n = 55 eligible; n = 35 consented). Uptake was high (n = 35/55; 63.6%), engagement modest (median 3/6 modules per user), and attrition acceptable (66% completed post-treatment). Efficacy signals were mixed: compared to controls, FMW-A participants experienced small improvements in fear of progression (d = 0.21) and global QOL (d = 0.22) and demonstrated a trend towards improvements in cancer-specific distress (d = 0.13) and role functioning (d = 0.18). However, FMW-A participants experienced small-to-moderate deteriorations in general distress (d = 0.23), mental QOL (d = 0.51), and social functioning (d = 0.27), whereas controls improved. Qualitatively, participants (n = 4) were satisfied with the program, perceived it as appropriate, but noted some sections could evoke transient distress.

Conclusion: The study demonstrated feasibility (high uptake and acceptable retention) and generated realistic recruitment estimates. While FMW-A appears promising for targeting cancer-specific distress and fear of progression, the mixed findings in quality of life and general distress warrant further revisions and testing.

Purpose: Chemotherapy-induced neutropenia poses a significant risk to cancer patients, with pegfilgrastim being commonly used for its prevention. While pegfilgrastim can be administered via prefilled syringe or pen device, patient preferences and experiences with these delivery methods remain unclear.

Methods: We conducted a prospective, open-label, randomized, observational trial (NCT05910164) at the Rafael Institute, France, comparing patient preferences for pegfilgrastim administration using a prefilled syringe versus a prefilled pen device. Patients undergoing chemotherapy and requiring pegfilgrastim were enrolled and randomized 1:1 to receive either syringe or pen first, with crossover administration. Questionnaires assessed patient preferences, learning experiences, autonomy, pain levels, emotional responses, satisfaction with nursing care, and empowerment.

Results: Among 150 randomized patients (mean age 58 years; 69% female), both groups showed a preference for the pen device, with significantly higher mean scores favoring pen administration (4.94 ± 1.70 vs. 4.27 ± 1.84; p = 0.00106). Patients reported significantly lower perceived pain with pen administration and stronger positive emotions compared to syringe use. Satisfaction with nursing care was higher with syringe use. Empowerment levels were similar across groups but significantly stronger when using the pen in complete autonomy.

Conclusion: A preference for pegfilgrastim administration via the pen device was observed, though this may have been influenced by the administration sequence and the absence of syringe self-administration. The insights gained can help inform clinical decision-making and improve patient-centered care in managing chemotherapy-induced neutropenia.

Trial registration: NCT05910164 on June 15, 2023.

Purpose: Robotic-assisted radical prostatectomy (RARP) impairs erectile function (EF) due to the surgical procedure and non-surgical factors. Non-surgical factors may contribute to recovery of erectile function (EFR) after RARP. This study assessed the role of non-surgical factors including physical activity in baseline EF and EFR after prostatectomy.

Methods: Patient Reported Measure Outcomes questionnaires from patients with localized prostate carcinoma who underwent a RARP with a postoperative follow up (FU) of 3 years. EFR was defined as at least 70% EF recovery of baseline IIEF-EF. Physical activities was defined as no activity at all, once a week and ≥ 2 a week.

Results: In total 804 patients were included. At baseline, age, lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS), having a partner and former smoking were significantly associated (p < .001) of EF. Postoperatively, the extent of nerve sparing and baseline EF were strongly associated with EFR (p < .001). Physical activity ≥ 2 a week predicted EF but only beyond 6 months of FU (p = .005, p = .028 and p = .007 at 1, 2 and 3 year FU respectively). Comorbidities, BMI and the use of medications known to affect EF were not predictive of EFR.

Conclusions: Age, LUTS, having a partner and former smoking were baseline associated with EF prior to RARP. Baseline EF and extent of nerve sparing jointly predicted EFR. Intensive physical activity was an independent predictor of EFR beyond the first year after RARP. Our findings suggests that besides clinical factors, lifestyle may also play a role in recovery of erectile function.

Purpose: Individuals diagnosed with cancer experience multiple inter-related short- and long-term side effects. Chief among such symptomology is cancer-related fatigue (CRF), which, if left unmanaged, can become chronic and result in increased disability and healthcare utilization. A growing number of self-report scales have been developed to measure CRF symptoms based on various theoretical conceptualizations with the aim of promoting targeted assessment and intervention efforts. It may be, however, unwise to assume that the various measures are conceptually similar (i.e., that they assess for the same constructs). Accordingly, we aimed to characterize item content among nine self-report scales, using a Jaccard index to quantify content overlap among scales.

Methods: We characterized construct assessment among nine self-report scales recommended to assess CRF by a recent clinical practice guideline, and used a Jaccard index to quantify content overlap among scales.

Results: Analysis of 208 items across nine rating scales resulted in 20 distinct symptoms of CRF assessed. The most common symptoms were energy level (captured in all nine scales), cognitive function, impaired task performance (in eight scales), sleepiness, and physical function (in seven scales). Mean overlap among all scales was low (Jaccard index = 0.455). Only one construct (duration of fatigue; 5.0%) was captured by a single scale, and one symptom (energy level; 5.0%) was common across all scales. The PFS, MFSI, and BFI each captured at least one symptom from each of the NCCN domains of CRF.

Conclusion: CRF scales are heterogeneous in the content they measure, critically impairing integration of knowledge across studies using disparate scales. Future work is urgently needed to build more integrated theoretical and/or computational models of CRF based on relevant mechanisms.

Background: Pathological complete response (pCR) after neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) and the percentage of tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes (TILs) are established prognostic biomarkers in early breast cancer (BC). While exercise training is effective as supportive care throughout the BC journey, its impact on the efficacy of NAC is unknown. This study aims to investigate the influence of a supervised exercise training program (SETP) on pCR and TILs in BC women undergoing NAC.

Methods: Retrospective exploratory analysis of the subgroup of BC patients treated with NAC included in a clinical trial randomizing to STEP and control arm. Endpoints were pCR, biopsy, and stromal TILs.

Results: Sixty-four participants were included, with a mean age of 50.3 ± 10.1 years, predominantly stage II and III disease (n = 58, 90.6%), HER2 + (n = 23, 35.9%), or triple-negative (n = 19, 29.7%) tumors. pCR was achieved in 56.7% and 55.9% in the STEP and control arm (p = 0.950). In the STEP arm, median TILs were 5.0 (0.0-80.0) and 5.0 (5.0-30.0), while in the control arm, 5.0 (0.0-90.0) and 0.0 (0.0-30.0) for biopsy and tumor site, respectively. The difference in TILs between arms was 0.04 (confidence interval (CI 95%) - 13.6, 13.7; p = 0.995) and - 4.3 (CI 95% - 11.5, 2.9; (p = 0.233) for biopsy and tumor site, respectively. No statistically significant difference was discerned between the groups concerning TILs of the biopsy. However, a marginally higher TIL level at the tumor site was associated with the SETP arm.

Conclusions: No differences were discerned within and between groups on both pCR and TILs, in possible relation to the exploratory nature of the analysis. Future adequately powered research is warranted.

Introduction: Over the past decade, several randomized controlled trials have compared single-day dexamethasone (dexamethasone-sparing) regimens to the current standard multi-day dexamethasone antiemetic regimen for chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting (CINV). The aim of this systematic review and meta-analysis is to compare the efficacy and safety of dexamethasone-sparing regimens to standard multi-day dexamethasone, used for the prophylaxis of CINV.

Methods: Ovid Medline and Embase were searched from database inception to March 2024. Studies were included if they reported on randomized controlled trials of adult cancer patients receiving different scheduling of dexamethasone, for the endpoints of complete response, complete control, no nausea, no vomiting, and no use of rescue medication. Safety was also assessed. Meta-analysis, leave-one-out meta-analysis, and cumulative meta-analysis were conducted to generate summary effect estimates and assess the influence of single trials on the summary effect estimate.

Results: Ten trials reporting on 2234 patients were included. Dexamethasone-sparing regimens were found to be no different to control arm in the acute (Risk Ratio [RR] 1.01; 95% CI, 0.94-1.08), delayed (RR 0.97; 95% CI, 0.89-1.05) and overall phases (RR 0.98; 95% CI, 0.90-1.06) for complete response. There was likewise no difference for complete control, no nausea, no vomiting, and no use of rescue medication. Safety profile was similar. There was no concern for bias in the published literature. No difference was found between studies reporting on anthracycline/cyclophosphamide-based highly emetogenic chemotherapy (HEC) and moderately emetogenic chemotherapy (MEC).

Conclusion: In this comprehensive systematic review and meta-analysis, dexamethasone-sparing regimens were found to be no different to current multi-day regimens with respect to efficacy and safety for MEC and anthracycline/cyclophosphamide-based regimens. Clinicians and future guidelines should strongly consider greater adoption and endorsement of dexamethasone-sparing regimens.

Purpose: This study reports the findings from the ADAPT randomized controlled trial (RCT), concerning the impact of a digital tool for supported self-management in people affected by breast cancer on patient activation as the primary outcome, with health-related quality of life (HRQoL), and health status as secondary outcomes.

Methods: Women with early-stage breast cancer were randomly assigned to standard care (control) or standard care in addition to the breast cancer digital tool (intervention). Data were collected using a demographic questionnaire, the Patient Activation Measure (PAM-13), the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Core Quality of Life Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-C30), and the EuroQol 5-Dimension 5-Level questionnaire (EQ-5D-5L) at baseline, 6 weeks, 3 months, 6 months, and 1 year from diagnosis. Linear mixed effect model regression was used to assess the effect of the digital tool over the first year from diagnosis while correcting for intra-participant correlation.

Results: A total of 166 participants were included, with 85 being randomized into the intervention. No significant differences (p > 0.05) in the PAM-13 scores, EORTC QLQ-C30 scales (global QoL, physical functioning, emotional functioning, pain, fatigue), and EQ-5D-5L Index between the control and intervention groups were observed. It is important to note that there was significant non-adherence within the intervention group.

Conclusion: The breast cancer digital tool had no statistically significant impact on patient activation, HRQoL, and health status over time compared to standard care alone in women with early-stage breast cancer. Future research should focus on identifying and addressing barriers to digital tool engagement to improve efficacy. Clinical trial information The study was registered at https://clinicaltrials.gov (NCT03866655) on 7 March 2019 ( https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT03866655 ).

Purpose: The usefulness of urine dipstick tests (UDTs) in patients with diabetes has been reported. The aim of the present study was to investigate the utility of self-performed UDTs and patient diaries in the management of impaired glucose tolerance, one of the adverse events of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs).

Methods: Patients receiving ICIs underwent self-checks with UDTs twice a week for up to 6 months. Pharmacists checked the results at every patient visit, and by phone every 3 months. The primary endpoint was to prospectively assess whether symptoms recorded in patient diaries and UDTs could reduce unscheduled hospital admissions due to impaired glucose tolerance. The secondary endpoint was the correlation between the symptoms in the patient diaries and UDT results.

Results: A total of 112 patients were enrolled in the study. Out of the 3197 planned self-UDTs, 3128 (97.8%) were performed. Forty-four patients (39.3%) were admitted to the hospital, two (1.8%) of whom were admitted due to abnormal glucose tolerance, with one having a positive UDT. There were 46 unscheduled outpatient visits (41.1%), of which five (4.5%) were due to abnormal glucose tolerance symptoms and four were due to a positive UDT. The correlation between descriptions of fatigue or dry mouth in the patient diaries and positive glucose UDTs was 52.4% in sensitivity and 62.4% in specificity.

Conclusion: Self-monitoring of symptoms and self-performing of UDTs could not reduce the emergency hospitalization rate. However, this approach could be effective in the objective monitoring of patient status, especially regarding glucose intolerance occurrences.

Purpose: Family caregivers (FCGs) play a pivotal role in supporting patients in palliative care at home. Person-centred support is crucial to prevent negative outcomes; therefore, evidence-based approaches such as the Carer Support Needs Assessment Tool Intervention (CSNAT-I) are promising. To understand more about the delivery of the intervention, the study focuses on documentation of CSNAT-I in practice in Austria to identify which support needs were discussed with the FCGs and the types of support delivered to meet these needs.

Methods: A retrospective analysis of electronic records was conducted, focusing on documented entries related to the delivery of CSNAT-I over a 21-month period (Dec 2019 to Aug 2021). Both qualitative and quantitative methods were employed for data analysis.

Results: The analysis identified a wide spectrum of FCG support needs, categorised into enabling domains related to caregiving for the patient and direct support needs concerning FCGs' own health and well-being. The most frequently documented support needs included 'having time for oneself in the day' and 'dealing with feelings and worries', highlighting the challenges FCGs face in balancing caregiving responsibilities with personal life. Supportive input encompassed advice and information, counselling, education and training, coordination and arrangement, and signposting and referral.

Conclusion: The study stresses the importance of addressing both practical and psychosocial aspects of caregiving, utilising a person-centred approach. Nurses provided comprehensive support mostly directly delivered during their contact with FCGs. CSNAT-I demonstrated flexibility, accommodating the diverse needs of FCGs in different situations, and may contribute to a more supportive care environment.