Stereotactic and Functional Neurosurgery最新文献

Introduction: L-2-hydroxyglutaric aciduria (L2HGA) is a rare neurometabolic disorder marked by progressive and debilitating psychomotor deficits. Here, we report the first patient with L2HGA-related refractory dystonia that was managed with deep brain stimulation to the bilateral globus pallidus internus (GPi-DBS).

Case presentation: We present a 17-year-old female with progressive decline in cognitive function, motor skills, and language ability which significantly impaired activities of daily living. Neurological exam revealed generalized dystonia, significant choreic movements in the upper extremities, slurred speech, bilateral dysmetria, and a wide-based gait. Brisk deep tendon reflexes, clonus, and bilateral Babinski signs were present. Urine 2-OH-glutaric acid level was significantly elevated. Brain MRI showed extensive supratentorial subcortical white matter signal abnormalities predominantly involving the U fibers and bilateral basal ganglia. Genetic testing identified a homozygous pathogenic mutation in the L-2-hydroxyglutarate dehydrogenase gene c. 164G>A (p. Gly55Asp). Following minimal response to pharmacotherapy, GPi-DBS was performed. Significant increases in mobility and decrease in dystonia were observed at 3 weeks, 6 months, and 12 months postoperatively.

Conclusion: This is the first utilization of DBS as treatment for L2HGA-related dystonia. The resulting significant improvements indicate that pallidal neuromodulation may be a viable option for pharmaco-resistant cases, and possibly in other secondary metabolic dystonias.

Introduction: Adoption of robotic techniques is increasing for neurosurgical applications. Common cranial applications include stereoelectroencephalography (sEEG) and deep brain stimulation (DBS). For surgeons to implement robotic techniques in these procedures, realistic learning curves must be anticipated for surgeons to overcome the challenges of integrating new techniques into surgical workflow. One such way of quantifying learning curves in surgery is cumulative sum (CUSUM) analysis.

Methods: Here, the authors present retrospective review of stereotactic cases to perform a CUSUM analysis of operative time for robotic cases at a single institution performed by 2 surgeons. The authors demonstrate learning phase durations of 20 and 16 cases in DBS and sEEG, respectively.

Results: After plateauing of operative time, mastery phases started at cases 132 and 72 in DBS and sEEG. A total of 273 cases (188 DBS and 85 sEEG) were included in the study. The authors observed a learning plateau concordant with change of location of surgery after exiting the learning phase.

Conclusion: This study demonstrates the learning curve of 2 stereotactic workflows when integrating robotics as well as being the first study to examine the robotic learning curve in DBS via CUSUM analysis. This work provides data on what surgeons may expect when integrating this technology into their practice for cranial applications.

Introduction: The aim of this study was to present a novel technique for subthalamic nucleus (STN) deep brain stimulation (DBS) implantation under general anesthesia by using intraoperative motor-evoked potentials (MEPs) through direct lead stimulation and determining their correlation to the thresholds of postoperative stimulation-induced side effects.

Methods: This study included 22 consecutive patients with advanced Parkinson's disease who underwent surgery in our institution between January 2021 and September 2023. All patients underwent bilateral implantation in the STN (44 leads) under general anesthesia without microelectrode recordings (MERs) by using MEPs with electrostimulation directly through the DBS lead. No cortical stimulation was performed during this process. Intraoperative fluoroscopic guidance and immediate postoperative computed tomography were used to verify the electrode's position. The lowest MEP thresholds were recorded and were correlated to the postoperative stimulation-induced side-effect threshold. The predictive values of the MEPs were analyzed. Five DBS leads were repositioned intraoperatively due to the MEP results.

Results: A moderately strong positive correlation was found between the MEP threshold and the capsular side-effect threshold (RS = 0.425, 95% CI, 0.17-0.67, p = 0.004). The highest sensitivity and specificity for predicting a side-effect threshold of 5 mA were found to be at 2.4 mA MEP threshold (sensitivity 97%, specificity 87.5%, positive predictive value 97%, and negative predictive value 87.5%). We also found high sensitivity and specificity (100%) at 1.15 mA MEP threshold and 3 mA side-effect threshold. Out of the total 44 leads, 5 (11.3%) leads were repositioned intraoperatively due to MEP thresholds lower than 1 mA (4 leads) or higher than 5 mA (1 lead). The mean accuracy on postoperative CT was 1.05 mm, and there were no postoperative side-effects under 2.8 mA.

Conclusion: Intraoperative MEPs with electrostimulation directly through the contacts of the DBS lead correlate with the stimulation-induced capsular side effects. The lead reposition based on intraoperative MEP may enlarge the therapeutic window of DBS stimulation.

Introduction: Aggressive disorders, in patients with intellectual disability, are satisfactorily managed with an educational, psychological, and pharmacological approach. Posterior hypothalamic region deep brain stimulation emerged in the last two decades as a promising treatment for patients with severe aggressive disorders. However, limited experiences are reported in the literature.

Methods: A systematic review was performed following PRISMA guidelines and recommendations by querying PubMed and Embase on August 24th, 2022, with the ensuing string parameters: ([deep brain stimulation] OR [DBS]) AND ([aggressiv*] OR disruptive). Cochrane Library, DynaMed, and ClinicalTrials.gov were consulted using the combination of keywords "deep brain stimulation" and "aggressive" or "aggression". The clinical outcome at the last follow-up and the rate of complications were considered primary and secondary outcomes of interest.

Results: The initial search identified 1,080 records, but only 10 studies met the inclusion criteria and were considered. The analysis of clinical outcome and complications was therefore performed on a total of 60 patients. Quality of all selected studies was classified as high, but one. Mean Overt Aggression Scale (OAS) improvement was 68%, while Inventory for Client Agency Planning (ICAP) improvement ranged between 38.3% and 80%. Complications occurred in 4 patients (6.7%).

Conclusion: Posterior hypothalamic region deep brain stimulation may be considered a valuable option for patients with severe aggression disorders and ID. This review can represent a mainstay for those who will be engaged in the surgical treatment of these patients.

Introduction: Deep brain stimulation (DBS) is a routine neurosurgical procedure utilized to treat various movement disorders including Parkinson's disease (PD), essential tremor (ET), and dystonia. Treatment efficacy is dependent on stereotactic accuracy of lead placement into the deep brain target of interest. However, brain shift attributed to pneumocephalus can introduce unpredictable inaccuracies during DBS lead placement. This study aimed to determine whether intracranial air is associated with brain shift in patients undergoing staged DBS surgery.

Methods: We retrospectively evaluated 46 patients who underwent staged DBS surgery for PD, ET, and dystonia. Due to the staged nature of DBS surgery at our institution, the first electrode placement is used as a concrete fiducial marker for movement in the target location. Postoperative computed tomography (CT) images after the first electrode implantation, as well as preoperative, and postoperative CT images after the second electrode implantation were collected. Images were analyzed in stereotactic targeting software (BrainLab); intracranial air was manually segmented, and electrode shift was measured in the x, y, and z plane, as well as a Euclidian distance on each set of merged CT scans. A Pearson correlation analysis was used to determine the relationship between intracranial air and brain shift, and student's t test was used to compare means between patients with and without radiographic evidence of intracranial air.

Results: Thirty-six patients had pneumocephalus after the first electrode implantation, while 35 had pneumocephalus after the second electrode implantation. Accumulation of intracranial air following the first electrode implantation (4.49 ± 6.05 cm3) was significantly correlated with brain shift along the y axis (0.04 ± 0.35 mm; r (34) = 0.36; p = 0.03), as well as the Euclidean distance of deviation (0.57 ± 0.33 mm; r (34) = 0.33; p = 0.05) indicating statistically significant shift on the ipsilateral side. However, there was no significant correlation between intracranial air and brain shift following the second electrode implantation, suggesting contralateral shift is minimal. Furthermore, there was no significant difference in brain shift between patients with and without radiographic evidence of intracranial air following both electrode implantation surgeries.

Conclusion: Despite observing volumes as high as 22.0 cm3 in patients with radiographic evidence of pneumocephalus, there was no significant difference in brain shift when compared to patients without pneumocephalus. Furthermore, the mean magnitude of brain shift was <1.0 mm regardless of whether pneumocephalus was presenting, suggesting that intracranial air accumulation may not produce clinical significant brain shift in our patients.

Introduction: MRI-guided focused ultrasound (FUS) is an incisionless thermo-ablative procedure that may be used to treat medication-refractory movement disorders, with a growing number of potential anatomic targets and clinical applications. As of this article's publication, the only US Food and Drug Administration (FDA)-approved uses of FUS for movement disorders are thalamotomy for essential tremor (ET) and tremor-dominant Parkinson's Disease (PD), and pallidotomy for other cardinal symptoms of PD. We present a state-of-the-art review on all non-FDA approved indications of FUS for movement disorders, beyond the most well-described indications of ET and PD. Our objective was to summarize the safety and efficacy of FUS in this setting and provide a roadmap for future directions of FUS for movement disorders.

Methods: A state-of-the-art review was conducted on use of FUS for non-FDA approved movement disorders. All movement disorders excluding FDA-approved uses for ET and PD were included.

Results: A total of 25 studies on 172 patients were included. In patients with tremor plus dystonia syndromes (n = 6), ventralis intermediate nucleus of the thalamus (VIM)-FUS gave >50% tremor reduction, with no improvement in dystonia and worsened dystonia in 2/6 patients. Ventral-oralis complex (VO)-FUS gave >50% improvement for focal hand dystonia (n = 6) and 100% return to musical performance in musician's dystonia (n = 6). In patients with multiple sclerosis (MS) and tremor (n = 3), improvement in tremor was seen in 2 patients with a favorable skull density ratio; no MS disease change was noted after VIM-FUS. In patients with tremor and comorbid ataxia syndromes (n = 3), none were found to have worsened ataxia after VIM-FUS; all had clinically significant tremor improvement. Subthalamic nucleus (STN)-FUS for PD (n = 49) gave approximately 50% improvement in PD motor symptoms, with dystonia and mild dyskinesias as possible adverse effects. Cerebellothalamic tract (CTT-FUS) for ET (n = 42) gave 55-90% tremor improvement, with gait dysfunction as a rare persistent adverse effect. Pallidothalamic tract (PTT-FUS) for PD (n = 50) gave approximately 50% improvement in motor symptoms, with mild speech dysfunction as a possible adverse effect.

Conclusion: VIM-FUS appeared safe and effective for heterogenous tremor etiologies, and VO-FUS appeared most effective for isolated segmental dystonia. STN-FUS was effective for PD symptom reduction; postoperative dystonia and mild on-medication dyskinesias required medical management. Tractography-based targeting with CTT-FUS for ET and PTT-FUS for PD demonstrated promising early results. Larger prospective trials with long-term follow-up are needed to the evaluate the safety and efficacy non-FDA approved indications for FUS.

Introduction: This study aimed to assess the impact of gamma knife radiosurgery on brainstem cavernous malformations (CMs).

Methods: A total of 85 patients (35 females; median age 41.0 years) who underwent gamma knife radiosurgery for brainstem CMs at our institute between 2006 and 2015 were enrolled in a prospective clinical observation trial. Risk factors for hemorrhagic outcomes were evaluated, and outcomes were compared across different margin doses.

Results: The pre-radiosurgery annual hemorrhage rate (AHR) was 32.3% (44 hemorrhages during 136.2 patient-years). The median planning target volume was 1.292 cc. The median margin and maximum doses were 15.0 and 29.2 Gy, respectively, with a median isodose line of 50.0%. The post-radiosurgery AHR was 2.7% (21 hemorrhages during 769.9 patient-years), with a rate of 5.5% within the first 2 years and 2.0% thereafter. The post-radiosurgery AHR for patients with margin doses of ≤13.0 Gy (n = 15), 14.0-15.0 Gy (n = 50), and ≥16.0 Gy (n = 20) was 5.4, 2.7, and 0.6%, respectively. Correspondingly, transient adverse radiation effects were observed in 6.7 (1/15), 10.0 (5/50), and 30.0% (6/20) of cases, respectively. An increased margin dose per 1 Gy (hazard ratio: 0.530, 95% CI: 0.341-0.826, p = 0.005) was identified as an independent protective factor against post-radiosurgery hemorrhage. Margin doses of ≥16.0 Gy were associated with improved hemorrhagic outcomes (hazard ratio: 0.343, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.157-0.749, p = 0.007), but an increased risk of adverse radiation effects (odds ratio: 3.006, 95% CI: 1.041-8.677, p = 0.042).

Conclusion: The AHR of brainstem CMs decreased following radiosurgery, and our study revealed a significant dose-response relationship. Margin doses of 14-15 Gy were recommended. Further studies are required to validate our findings.

Background: Deep brain stimulation (DBS) is an effective therapy for Parkinson's disease (PD), but disparities exist in access to DBS along gender, racial, and socioeconomic lines.

Summary: Women are underrepresented in clinical trials and less likely to undergo DBS compared to their male counterparts. Racial and ethnic minorities are also less likely to undergo DBS procedures, even when controlling for disease severity and other demographic factors. These disparities can have significant impacts on patients' access to care, quality of life, and ability to manage their debilitating movement disorders.

Key messages: Addressing these disparities requires increasing patient awareness and education, minimizing barriers to equitable access, and implementing diversity and inclusion initiatives within the healthcare system. In this systematic review, we first review literature discussing gender, racial, and socioeconomic disparities in DBS access and then propose several patient, provider, community, and national-level interventions to improve DBS access for all populations.

Introduction: In tremor syndromes, pharmacological therapy is the primary treatment, but deep brain stimulation (DBS) is used when it is insufficient. We explore the use of DBS, focusing on the globus pallidus internus for dystonia and the ventral intermediate nucleus (VIM) for tremor conditions. We introduce the posterior subthalamic area (PSA) as a potential target, suggesting its efficacy in tremor reduction, particularly in rare tremor syndromes. We aim to evaluate the efficacy and safety of double targeting the VIM and PSA in rare tremor conditions, highlighting the limited existing data on this.

Methods: Between 2019 and 2023, 22 patients with rare tremor syndromes were treated with bilateral DBS of the VIM and PSA. This case series consisted of 7 isolated head tremor, 1 hepatic encephalopathic tremor due to Abernethy syndrome, 2 voice tremor, 4 dystonic tremor, and 8 Holmes tremor (2 multiple sclerosis, 2 cerebellar insult, and 4 posttraumatic) patients. Patients' preoperative and 12-month postoperative tremor scores were compared, and the optimum VIM and PSA stimulation areas were investigated.

Results: There was a significant reduction in the mean TRS score from 3.70 (±0.57) to 0.45 (±0.68) after 12 months of surgery. Specific outcomes for different indications were observed: for head tremor, 6 of 7 patients showed a reduction in TRS scores to 0 points; the vocal tremor patients demonstrated improvement; this change was not statistically significant, which is likely to be due to the low number of patients in this subgroup; the dystonic tremor patients showed either complete tremor abolition or a reduction in TRS scores; the Holmes tremor patients showed an 80% reduction in TRS scores; and the hepatic encephalopathy tremor and Abernethy syndrome patients showed a 75% improvement in TRS scores. The stimulation parameters converged on the VIM and dorsal PSA. Complications included the need for electrode repositioning, infections requiring electrode removal and re-implantation, dysarthria, and stimulation-induced ataxia, which was resolved by adjusting the stimulation parameters.

Discussion: The literature on DBS for rare tremors is limited. Double targeting of the VIM and PSA appears to produce promising improvements on the outcomes reported in the existing literature on VIM-only DBS. The proximity of the VIM and PSA allows for flexible electrode placement, contributing to the potential success of the dual-target approach. We also discuss the theoretical advantages of targeting the PSA based on the distribution of tremor circuits, emphasizing the need for further research and electrophysiological studies.

ESSFN Scientific Committee & Officers responsible for Abstract Selection Rick Schuurman, Amsterdam, The Netherlands - President Loránd Eröss, Budapest, Hungary - Vice President Jocelyne Bloch, Lausanne, Switzerland - Secretary Patric Blomstedt, Umea, Sweden - Second Secretary Jean Regis, Marseilles, France - Treasurer Conflict of Interest Statement The abstracts included in this supplement were reviewed and selected by the ESSFN Scientific Committee and Officers responsible for Abstract Selection. The committee has no conflicts of interest in connection with the congress and the selection of abstracts.