Kyung Won Chang, Won Jae Lee, Kyuha Chong, Jung-Won Choi, Doo-Sik Kong, Ho Jun Seol, Do-Hyun Nam, Jung-Il Lee
Introduction: Trigeminal schwannomas (TSs) are rare benign tumors arising from the trigeminal nerve. Gamma Knife radiosurgery (GKS) offers a minimally invasive alternative to surgical resection, but the long-term clinical outcomes, particularly regarding change of trigeminal nerve function, remain under-characterized. This study aimed to evaluate long-term clinical outcomes and identify prognostic factors for neurological sequelae following primary GKS for TS.
Methods: A retrospective analysis was performed on 89 patients who underwent primary GKS for TS between 2002 and 2023. Patients with prior surgery or hypofractionation were excluded. Clinical and imaging data were analyzed for tumor control, symptom relief, and new-onset, or persistent post-GKS morbidities. Symptoms were classified as new-onset transient, new-onset permanent, or persistent preexisting. The Kaplan-Meier analysis, Logistic regression, and Cox regression were used to identify prognostic factors.
Results: Over a median follow-up of 57 months (range, 6.8-184), tumor control was 93.3%. Symptom relief occurred in 46.9% of preexisting deficits, highest for headache (70.6%) and dizziness (100%), but modest for trigeminal pain (33.3%) and paresthesia (36.7%). New-onset morbidities included trigeminal sensory disturbance (33.7%, permanent in 15) and pain (22.5%, permanent in 5). In Cox analysis, higher margin dose reduced the hazard of new paresthesia (HR 0.511, p = 0.036), while older age increased risk (HR 1.041, p = 0.037).
Conclusion: Primary GKS achieves durable tumor control for TS with lower risk than microsurgery. However, a considerable proportion of patients may experience long-term trigeminal dysfunction. Adequate dosing may mitigate sensory morbidity, though pain relief remains modest. Careful selection, counseling, and follow-up are essential.
简介:三叉神经神经鞘瘤是一种罕见的良性肿瘤,起源于三叉神经。伽玛刀放射外科(GKS)提供了手术切除的一种微创替代方法,但长期临床结果,特别是关于三叉神经功能的改变,仍然不清楚。本研究旨在评估TS原发性GKS后神经系统后遗症的长期临床结果和预后因素。方法:回顾性分析2002年至2023年间89例TS原发性GKS患者。排除既往手术或切开过的患者。分析肿瘤控制、症状缓解、新发或持续gks后发病率的临床和影像学数据。症状分为新发短暂性、新发永久性和持续既往。采用Kaplan-Meier分析、Logistic回归和Cox回归确定预后因素。结果:中位随访57个月(范围6.8-184),肿瘤控制率为93.3%。46.9%的既往缺陷患者出现症状缓解,头痛(70.6%)和头晕(100%)症状缓解最高,但三叉神经痛(33.3%)和感觉异常(36.7%)症状缓解一般。新发疾病包括三叉神经感觉障碍(33.7%,15例为永久性)和疼痛(22.5%,5例为永久性)。在Cox分析中,较高的切缘剂量降低了新发感觉异常的风险(HR 0.511, p = 0.036),而年龄越大则增加了风险(HR 1.041, p = 0.037)。结论:与显微手术相比,原发性GKS治疗TS可实现持久的肿瘤控制。然而,相当一部分患者可能会经历长期的三叉神经功能障碍。适当的剂量可以减轻感觉疾病,但疼痛缓解仍然有限。仔细选择、咨询和随访是必不可少的。
{"title":"Primary Gamma Knife Radiosurgery for Trigeminal Schwannoma: A Retrospective Analysis of Long-Term Functional Outcomes.","authors":"Kyung Won Chang, Won Jae Lee, Kyuha Chong, Jung-Won Choi, Doo-Sik Kong, Ho Jun Seol, Do-Hyun Nam, Jung-Il Lee","doi":"10.1159/000549089","DOIUrl":"10.1159/000549089","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Trigeminal schwannomas (TSs) are rare benign tumors arising from the trigeminal nerve. Gamma Knife radiosurgery (GKS) offers a minimally invasive alternative to surgical resection, but the long-term clinical outcomes, particularly regarding change of trigeminal nerve function, remain under-characterized. This study aimed to evaluate long-term clinical outcomes and identify prognostic factors for neurological sequelae following primary GKS for TS.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A retrospective analysis was performed on 89 patients who underwent primary GKS for TS between 2002 and 2023. Patients with prior surgery or hypofractionation were excluded. Clinical and imaging data were analyzed for tumor control, symptom relief, and new-onset, or persistent post-GKS morbidities. Symptoms were classified as new-onset transient, new-onset permanent, or persistent preexisting. The Kaplan-Meier analysis, Logistic regression, and Cox regression were used to identify prognostic factors.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Over a median follow-up of 57 months (range, 6.8-184), tumor control was 93.3%. Symptom relief occurred in 46.9% of preexisting deficits, highest for headache (70.6%) and dizziness (100%), but modest for trigeminal pain (33.3%) and paresthesia (36.7%). New-onset morbidities included trigeminal sensory disturbance (33.7%, permanent in 15) and pain (22.5%, permanent in 5). In Cox analysis, higher margin dose reduced the hazard of new paresthesia (HR 0.511, p = 0.036), while older age increased risk (HR 1.041, p = 0.037).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Primary GKS achieves durable tumor control for TS with lower risk than microsurgery. However, a considerable proportion of patients may experience long-term trigeminal dysfunction. Adequate dosing may mitigate sensory morbidity, though pain relief remains modest. Careful selection, counseling, and follow-up are essential.</p>","PeriodicalId":22078,"journal":{"name":"Stereotactic and Functional Neurosurgery","volume":" ","pages":"1-10"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4,"publicationDate":"2025-10-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12707899/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145318620","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Ahmad Soltani, Seyed Reza Abdipour Mehrian, Vahid Reza Ostovan, Peyman Petramfar, Saba Nouri, Maryam Adel, Ali Namjoo-Moghadam
Introduction: Bilateral electrode implantation is the primary approach for deep brain stimulation (DBS) in Parkinson's disease (PD). However, it may lead to gait deterioration in some patients. This study aimed to investigate the efficacy of unilateral DBS on gait in PD patients as an alternative with fewer side effects and lower costs.
Methods: We systematically searched four major clinical databases to evaluate the effects of unilateral DBS on UPDRS gait score, gait velocity, stride length, cadence, and gait initiation in PD patients. Twenty-three studies were included in the review, selected from an initial pool of 2,415 studies. We also performed a meta-analysis to assess the impact of unilateral DBS on gait velocity and compare its efficacy to bilateral stimulation. The study protocol was registered at PROSPERO with the registration code: CRD42024585359.
Results: The included studies assessed gait measures in patients receiving unilateral DBS targeting the STN, globus pallidus internus, pedunculopontine nucleus, and ventral intermediate nucleus. According to the systematic review of clinical evidence, unilateral DBS can improve the UPDRS gait score, freezing of gait, and gait velocity, although to a lesser extent than bilateral stimulation. The meta-analysis revealed a nonsignificant positive pooled effect on gait velocity in the unilateral DBS condition compared to the control condition and no significant difference when compared to bilateral DBS.
Conclusion: Unilateral DBS shows promise for improving gait in PD, as an alternative with lower costs and side effects, especially in early-stage or asymmetric cases.
{"title":"Efficacy of Unilateral Deep Brain Stimulation for Gait Enhancement in Parkinson's Disease: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.","authors":"Ahmad Soltani, Seyed Reza Abdipour Mehrian, Vahid Reza Ostovan, Peyman Petramfar, Saba Nouri, Maryam Adel, Ali Namjoo-Moghadam","doi":"10.1159/000548468","DOIUrl":"10.1159/000548468","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Bilateral electrode implantation is the primary approach for deep brain stimulation (DBS) in Parkinson's disease (PD). However, it may lead to gait deterioration in some patients. This study aimed to investigate the efficacy of unilateral DBS on gait in PD patients as an alternative with fewer side effects and lower costs.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We systematically searched four major clinical databases to evaluate the effects of unilateral DBS on UPDRS gait score, gait velocity, stride length, cadence, and gait initiation in PD patients. Twenty-three studies were included in the review, selected from an initial pool of 2,415 studies. We also performed a meta-analysis to assess the impact of unilateral DBS on gait velocity and compare its efficacy to bilateral stimulation. The study protocol was registered at PROSPERO with the registration code: CRD42024585359.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The included studies assessed gait measures in patients receiving unilateral DBS targeting the STN, globus pallidus internus, pedunculopontine nucleus, and ventral intermediate nucleus. According to the systematic review of clinical evidence, unilateral DBS can improve the UPDRS gait score, freezing of gait, and gait velocity, although to a lesser extent than bilateral stimulation. The meta-analysis revealed a nonsignificant positive pooled effect on gait velocity in the unilateral DBS condition compared to the control condition and no significant difference when compared to bilateral DBS.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Unilateral DBS shows promise for improving gait in PD, as an alternative with lower costs and side effects, especially in early-stage or asymmetric cases.</p>","PeriodicalId":22078,"journal":{"name":"Stereotactic and Functional Neurosurgery","volume":" ","pages":"1-12"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4,"publicationDate":"2025-10-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145313697","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Franziska A Schmidt, Irene Martinez-Torres, Jürgen Germann, Mohammad Mehdi Hajiabadi, Oliver Bichsel, Can Sarica, Andres M Lozano
Background: Deep brain stimulation (DBS) is a well-established treatment for several neurological and neuropsychiatric conditions, including movement disorders such as Parkinson's disease, essential tremor, and dystonia, as well as Gilles de la Tourette's syndrome, epilepsy, and obsessive-compulsive disorder.
Summary: In recent years, research has expanded to explore the potential of DBS for other indications, including dementia, addiction, disorders of consciousness (e.g., minimally conscious state), and eating disorders. Over the past 3 decades, significant technological advancements have been made in DBS devices, including improvements in electrode design, stimulation parameters, and battery life. However, despite these technological innovations, equitable access to DBS has not progressed at a similar pace. Barriers to access remain a persistent challenge globally, influenced by socioeconomic, geographic, systemic, and policy-related factors.
Key message: This review summarizes the current literature on access to DBS, highlighting disparities, challenges, and potential strategies to improve availability and equity in its application.
{"title":"Disparities in Access to Deep Brain Stimulation.","authors":"Franziska A Schmidt, Irene Martinez-Torres, Jürgen Germann, Mohammad Mehdi Hajiabadi, Oliver Bichsel, Can Sarica, Andres M Lozano","doi":"10.1159/000548814","DOIUrl":"10.1159/000548814","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Deep brain stimulation (DBS) is a well-established treatment for several neurological and neuropsychiatric conditions, including movement disorders such as Parkinson's disease, essential tremor, and dystonia, as well as Gilles de la Tourette's syndrome, epilepsy, and obsessive-compulsive disorder.</p><p><strong>Summary: </strong>In recent years, research has expanded to explore the potential of DBS for other indications, including dementia, addiction, disorders of consciousness (e.g., minimally conscious state), and eating disorders. Over the past 3 decades, significant technological advancements have been made in DBS devices, including improvements in electrode design, stimulation parameters, and battery life. However, despite these technological innovations, equitable access to DBS has not progressed at a similar pace. Barriers to access remain a persistent challenge globally, influenced by socioeconomic, geographic, systemic, and policy-related factors.</p><p><strong>Key message: </strong>This review summarizes the current literature on access to DBS, highlighting disparities, challenges, and potential strategies to improve availability and equity in its application.</p>","PeriodicalId":22078,"journal":{"name":"Stereotactic and Functional Neurosurgery","volume":" ","pages":"1-7"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4,"publicationDate":"2025-10-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145281124","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Arif Abdulbaki, Amr Jijakli, Ali Savas, Angelo Rafael Cunha de Azevedo, Erich Talamoni Fonoff, Paresh K Doshi, Joachim K Krauss
Background Radiofrequency lesioning (RL) had been a mainstay in functional neurosurgery for dystonic movement disorders before the widespread adoption of deep brain stimulation (DBS). Outcomes of RL in hemidystonia have varied. This review provides a systematic analysis of RL for hemidystonia and evaluates the spectrum of clinical outcome. Methods A systematic literature review was performed according to PRISMA guidelines in PubMed, Embase, and Web of Science using a customized software (UiPath, NY) to identify all case reports, case series, and cohort studies reporting patients with hemidystonia treated with RF. Manuscripts were automatically searched for the term "hemidystonia". The selected manuscripts were then manually screened. Detailed information from two recent multi-patient studies was added. Clinical improvement was classified as follows: (0) no improvement; (I) mild; (II) moderate; (III) marked improvement. Results Twenty-eight studies with individual patient data were included, totaling 101 cases published between 1962 and 2024. Thalamotomy was performed in 80 cases, pallidotomy in 16, and both in 5. At last follow-up, 18 patients (19.35%) showed marked improvement, 41 (44.09%) moderate, 16 (17.21%) mild, and 18 (19.35%) no benefit. No significant differences in outcomes were found between targets or etiologies, though patients with traumatic brain injury tended to fare worse. A significant negative linear correlation was found between the degree of improvement and age at surgery. Conclusion With advancements in targeting and technology, RL may be reconsidered as a treatment option for hemidystonia. Further studies with standardized outcome assessments are needed to better characterize response variability and identify prognostic factors.
背景:在广泛采用深部脑刺激(DBS)之前,射频损伤(RL)一直是功能性神经外科治疗肌张力障碍的主要方法。半肌张力障碍患者的RL预后各不相同。这篇综述提供了半系统肌张力障碍的RL的系统分析,并评估临床结果的频谱。方法根据PubMed、Embase和Web of Science的PRISMA指南,使用定制软件(UiPath, NY)进行系统的文献综述,以确定所有报告用RF治疗半系统肌痉挛患者的病例报告、病例系列和队列研究。手稿会自动搜索“半截肌”这个词。然后对选定的手稿进行人工筛选。补充了最近两项多患者研究的详细信息。临床改善情况分为以下几类:(0)无改善;(我)温和的;(2)温和的;(三)改善明显。结果纳入28项有个体患者资料的研究,共101例于1962年至2024年间发表。丘脑切开术80例,苍白球切开术16例,两者均行5例。末次随访显着改善18例(19.35%),中度41例(44.09%),轻度16例(17.21%),无改善18例(19.35%)。虽然创伤性脑损伤患者的情况往往更糟,但结果在目标或病因之间没有发现显著差异。改善程度与手术年龄呈显著的负线性相关。结论随着靶向性和技术的进步,RL可能会被重新考虑作为半肌张力障碍的治疗选择。需要进行标准化结果评估的进一步研究,以更好地表征反应变异性并确定预后因素。
{"title":"Radiofrequency lesioning for hemidystonia: a systematic review and meta-analysis with individual patient data.","authors":"Arif Abdulbaki, Amr Jijakli, Ali Savas, Angelo Rafael Cunha de Azevedo, Erich Talamoni Fonoff, Paresh K Doshi, Joachim K Krauss","doi":"10.1159/000548654","DOIUrl":"10.1159/000548654","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Background Radiofrequency lesioning (RL) had been a mainstay in functional neurosurgery for dystonic movement disorders before the widespread adoption of deep brain stimulation (DBS). Outcomes of RL in hemidystonia have varied. This review provides a systematic analysis of RL for hemidystonia and evaluates the spectrum of clinical outcome. Methods A systematic literature review was performed according to PRISMA guidelines in PubMed, Embase, and Web of Science using a customized software (UiPath, NY) to identify all case reports, case series, and cohort studies reporting patients with hemidystonia treated with RF. Manuscripts were automatically searched for the term \"hemidystonia\". The selected manuscripts were then manually screened. Detailed information from two recent multi-patient studies was added. Clinical improvement was classified as follows: (0) no improvement; (I) mild; (II) moderate; (III) marked improvement. Results Twenty-eight studies with individual patient data were included, totaling 101 cases published between 1962 and 2024. Thalamotomy was performed in 80 cases, pallidotomy in 16, and both in 5. At last follow-up, 18 patients (19.35%) showed marked improvement, 41 (44.09%) moderate, 16 (17.21%) mild, and 18 (19.35%) no benefit. No significant differences in outcomes were found between targets or etiologies, though patients with traumatic brain injury tended to fare worse. A significant negative linear correlation was found between the degree of improvement and age at surgery. Conclusion With advancements in targeting and technology, RL may be reconsidered as a treatment option for hemidystonia. Further studies with standardized outcome assessments are needed to better characterize response variability and identify prognostic factors.</p>","PeriodicalId":22078,"journal":{"name":"Stereotactic and Functional Neurosurgery","volume":" ","pages":"1-25"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4,"publicationDate":"2025-10-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145259351","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Stereotactic anterior cingulotomy is a neurosurgical technique that can offer significant pain relief in patients with refractory cancer pain, particularly in the palliative setting. Despite being described in the 1960s, its use has recently resurged due to limitations of pharmacologic and neuromodulatory therapies in terminally ill patients. The anterior cingulate cortex plays a crucial role in the affective processing of pain, and its disruption through targeted lesioning may reduce suffering without eliminating nociception. This review summarises the historical background, patient selection criteria, surgical approaches, efficacy data, and safety outcomes associated with bilateral anterior cingulotomy for cancer-related pain. Additionally, the Queen Square approach, incorporating MRI-guided targeting and diffusion imaging, is described. Available data support the procedure's short-term efficacy in the majority of patients, with limited cognitive side effects and minimal morbidity. Future directions include network-based targeting, refinement of lesion techniques, and consideration of non-invasive alternatives such as focused ultrasound. Further research is warranted to optimise selection criteria and understand the neural mechanisms underlying pain relief.
{"title":"Cingulotomy for Cancer Pain.","authors":"Valentina Lind, Harith Akram","doi":"10.1159/000548804","DOIUrl":"10.1159/000548804","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Stereotactic anterior cingulotomy is a neurosurgical technique that can offer significant pain relief in patients with refractory cancer pain, particularly in the palliative setting. Despite being described in the 1960s, its use has recently resurged due to limitations of pharmacologic and neuromodulatory therapies in terminally ill patients. The anterior cingulate cortex plays a crucial role in the affective processing of pain, and its disruption through targeted lesioning may reduce suffering without eliminating nociception. This review summarises the historical background, patient selection criteria, surgical approaches, efficacy data, and safety outcomes associated with bilateral anterior cingulotomy for cancer-related pain. Additionally, the Queen Square approach, incorporating MRI-guided targeting and diffusion imaging, is described. Available data support the procedure's short-term efficacy in the majority of patients, with limited cognitive side effects and minimal morbidity. Future directions include network-based targeting, refinement of lesion techniques, and consideration of non-invasive alternatives such as focused ultrasound. Further research is warranted to optimise selection criteria and understand the neural mechanisms underlying pain relief.</p>","PeriodicalId":22078,"journal":{"name":"Stereotactic and Functional Neurosurgery","volume":" ","pages":"1-20"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4,"publicationDate":"2025-10-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145245293","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Justin M Campbell, Brent M Kious, Shervin Rahimpour, Ben Shofty
Background: Psychiatric neurosurgery has been shaped by an ethically complex history and rapid evolution in neurotechnology. In the modern era, there is a growing need to match the accelerating pace of scientific innovation with rigorous, contemporary ethical frameworks that prioritize patient autonomy, safety, and maintaining public trust.
Summary: In this article, we review 21st-century approaches to neurosurgery for psychiatric disorders that combine the precision of modern functional neurosurgery with advances in diagnostic and therapeutic neurotechnology. The ethical issues in contemporary psychiatric neurosurgery are multifaceted and evolving, reflecting the intersection of rapid scientific progress, changing societal values, and a controversial past.
Key messages: The four core principles of medical ethics - beneficence, nonmaleficence, autonomy, and justice - and their application to psychiatric neurosurgery are discussed in the context of existing and anticipated ethical issues (e.g., post-trial responsibilities in research, informed consent, disparities in access to care). Finally, we explore how technological breakthroughs, coupled with growing market investment and consumer interest in the field, establish a compelling need to develop robust, forward-looking regulatory frameworks that are aligned with these bioethical principles.
{"title":"Contemporary Ethical Considerations in Psychiatric Neurosurgery.","authors":"Justin M Campbell, Brent M Kious, Shervin Rahimpour, Ben Shofty","doi":"10.1159/000548528","DOIUrl":"10.1159/000548528","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Psychiatric neurosurgery has been shaped by an ethically complex history and rapid evolution in neurotechnology. In the modern era, there is a growing need to match the accelerating pace of scientific innovation with rigorous, contemporary ethical frameworks that prioritize patient autonomy, safety, and maintaining public trust.</p><p><strong>Summary: </strong>In this article, we review 21st-century approaches to neurosurgery for psychiatric disorders that combine the precision of modern functional neurosurgery with advances in diagnostic and therapeutic neurotechnology. The ethical issues in contemporary psychiatric neurosurgery are multifaceted and evolving, reflecting the intersection of rapid scientific progress, changing societal values, and a controversial past.</p><p><strong>Key messages: </strong>The four core principles of medical ethics - beneficence, nonmaleficence, autonomy, and justice - and their application to psychiatric neurosurgery are discussed in the context of existing and anticipated ethical issues (e.g., post-trial responsibilities in research, informed consent, disparities in access to care). Finally, we explore how technological breakthroughs, coupled with growing market investment and consumer interest in the field, establish a compelling need to develop robust, forward-looking regulatory frameworks that are aligned with these bioethical principles.</p>","PeriodicalId":22078,"journal":{"name":"Stereotactic and Functional Neurosurgery","volume":" ","pages":"1-10"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4,"publicationDate":"2025-09-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145102914","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Karim Mithani, Pranjan Gandhi, Yousof Alrumayyan, Puneet Jain, George M Ibrahim
Surgical treatment of generalized drug-resistant epilepsy (DRE), lacking a clearly resectable epileptogenic focus, presents a formidable clinical challenge. Inadequately treated generalized DRE is associated with neurological deficits, impaired neurodevelopment, poor quality of life, and lifelong educational and occupational difficulties. Over the last half-century, various neurosurgical interventions have been introduced for the management of generalized DRE. These include longstanding and well-established disconnection procedures, which have evolved over time to reduce surgical morbidity, as well as more recent options such as neuromodulation through surgically implanted devices. As technological advances and evidence for their use continues to grow, clinical decision-making has become increasingly nuanced. In this article, we review contemporary neurosurgical approaches for managing generalized DRE, including the most common disconnection and neuromodulation-based interventions, and provide a framework to guide patient selection and presurgical counselling at specialized epilepsy centers. We conclude with an overview of current and emerging technological advances in this rapidly evolving field, providing an up-to-date resource for clinicians to inform practice.
{"title":"Contemporary disconnection and neuromodulation treatments for generalized drug-resistant epilepsy: A narrative review and clinical decision-making framework.","authors":"Karim Mithani, Pranjan Gandhi, Yousof Alrumayyan, Puneet Jain, George M Ibrahim","doi":"10.1159/000547924","DOIUrl":"10.1159/000547924","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Surgical treatment of generalized drug-resistant epilepsy (DRE), lacking a clearly resectable epileptogenic focus, presents a formidable clinical challenge. Inadequately treated generalized DRE is associated with neurological deficits, impaired neurodevelopment, poor quality of life, and lifelong educational and occupational difficulties. Over the last half-century, various neurosurgical interventions have been introduced for the management of generalized DRE. These include longstanding and well-established disconnection procedures, which have evolved over time to reduce surgical morbidity, as well as more recent options such as neuromodulation through surgically implanted devices. As technological advances and evidence for their use continues to grow, clinical decision-making has become increasingly nuanced. In this article, we review contemporary neurosurgical approaches for managing generalized DRE, including the most common disconnection and neuromodulation-based interventions, and provide a framework to guide patient selection and presurgical counselling at specialized epilepsy centers. We conclude with an overview of current and emerging technological advances in this rapidly evolving field, providing an up-to-date resource for clinicians to inform practice.</p>","PeriodicalId":22078,"journal":{"name":"Stereotactic and Functional Neurosurgery","volume":" ","pages":"1-28"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4,"publicationDate":"2025-08-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12503669/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144875344","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Background Long-term/low grade epilepsy-associated tumors (LEATs) compose a complex group of low-grade brain neoplasms associated with drug-resistant focal epilepsy, primarily affecting pediatric and adolescent populations. LEATs exhibit significant epileptogenic potential, profoundly impacting patients' neurological and psychosocial outcomes. Advances in molecular pathology, particularly the identification of BRAF V600E and FGFR1 mutations, have enhanced the classification and understanding of these tumors, opening potential avenues for targeted therapies. Summary This review synthesizes current knowledge on LEAT biology, epileptogenesis, and clinical manifestations, highlighting the tumor microenvironment's role in seizure generation through disrupted neurotransmitter signaling, inflammatory processes, and network hyperexcitability. The integration of advanced neuroimaging, electrophysiology, and molecular diagnostics has refined LEAT detection and classification, improving surgical decision-making. Surgical resection remains the mainstay of treatment, with seizure freedom rates exceeding 80% when combined with tailored epilepsy surgery. However, variability in surgical outcomes underscores the need for individualized approaches, incorporating emerging minimally invasive techniques, such as laser interstitial thermal therapy (LITT), and neuromodulation strategies. Key Messages Despite advancements in the diagnosis and treatment of LEATs, key challenges remain, including refractory epilepsy, malignant progression, and the long-term impact of LEATs on cognitive function. Future research aims to refine the molecular and histopathological classification of LEATs, develop predictive biomarkers for seizure outcomes, and explore precision therapies targeting tumor-associated epileptogenesis. As the field evolves, a multidisciplinary approach integrating surgery, molecular therapeutics, and neurorehabilitation will be essential in optimizing patient outcomes.
{"title":"Managing LEATs in Patients with Refractory and Non-Refractory Epilepsy.","authors":"Arjun Rohit Adapa, Hannah Haile, Guy M McKhann","doi":"10.1159/000546652","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1159/000546652","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Background Long-term/low grade epilepsy-associated tumors (LEATs) compose a complex group of low-grade brain neoplasms associated with drug-resistant focal epilepsy, primarily affecting pediatric and adolescent populations. LEATs exhibit significant epileptogenic potential, profoundly impacting patients' neurological and psychosocial outcomes. Advances in molecular pathology, particularly the identification of BRAF V600E and FGFR1 mutations, have enhanced the classification and understanding of these tumors, opening potential avenues for targeted therapies. Summary This review synthesizes current knowledge on LEAT biology, epileptogenesis, and clinical manifestations, highlighting the tumor microenvironment's role in seizure generation through disrupted neurotransmitter signaling, inflammatory processes, and network hyperexcitability. The integration of advanced neuroimaging, electrophysiology, and molecular diagnostics has refined LEAT detection and classification, improving surgical decision-making. Surgical resection remains the mainstay of treatment, with seizure freedom rates exceeding 80% when combined with tailored epilepsy surgery. However, variability in surgical outcomes underscores the need for individualized approaches, incorporating emerging minimally invasive techniques, such as laser interstitial thermal therapy (LITT), and neuromodulation strategies. Key Messages Despite advancements in the diagnosis and treatment of LEATs, key challenges remain, including refractory epilepsy, malignant progression, and the long-term impact of LEATs on cognitive function. Future research aims to refine the molecular and histopathological classification of LEATs, develop predictive biomarkers for seizure outcomes, and explore precision therapies targeting tumor-associated epileptogenesis. As the field evolves, a multidisciplinary approach integrating surgery, molecular therapeutics, and neurorehabilitation will be essential in optimizing patient outcomes.</p>","PeriodicalId":22078,"journal":{"name":"Stereotactic and Functional Neurosurgery","volume":" ","pages":"1-29"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9,"publicationDate":"2025-06-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144286529","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-01-01Epub Date: 2024-09-25DOI: 10.1159/000541151
Stefan Hunsche, Alexandra Hellerbach, Markus Eichner, Christoph Panknin, Sebastian Faby, Jochen Wirths, Veerle Visser-Vandewalle, Harald Treuer, Dieter Fedders
Introduction: Photon-counting detector computed tomography (PCD-CT) represents the next generation of CT technology, offering enhanced capabilities for detecting the orientation of directional leads in deep brain stimulation (DBS). This study aims to refine PCD-CT-based lead orientation determination using an automated method applicable to devices from various manufacturers, addressing current methodological limitations and improving neurosurgical precision.
Methods: An automated method was developed to ascertain the orientation of directional DBS leads using PCD-CT data and grayscale model fitting for devices from Boston Scientific, Medtronic, and Abbott. A phantom study was conducted to evaluate the precision and accuracy of this method, comparing it with the stripe artifact method across different lead alignments relative to the CT gantry axis.
Results: Except for the Medtronic Sensight™ lead, where detection was occasionally unfeasible if aligned normal to the z-axis of the CT gantry, a clinically very unlikely alignment, the lead orientation could be automatically determined regardless of its position. The accuracy and precision of this automated method was comparable to those of the stripe artifact method.
Conclusion: PCD-CT enables the automatic determination of lead orientation from leading manufacturers with an accuracy comparable to the stripe artifact method, and it offers the added benefit of being independent of the clinically occurring orientation of the head and, consequently, the lead relative to the CT gantry axis.
{"title":"Automatic Detection of Directional Lead Orientation in Deep Brain Stimulation using Photon-Counting Detector Computed Tomography: A Phantom Study.","authors":"Stefan Hunsche, Alexandra Hellerbach, Markus Eichner, Christoph Panknin, Sebastian Faby, Jochen Wirths, Veerle Visser-Vandewalle, Harald Treuer, Dieter Fedders","doi":"10.1159/000541151","DOIUrl":"10.1159/000541151","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Photon-counting detector computed tomography (PCD-CT) represents the next generation of CT technology, offering enhanced capabilities for detecting the orientation of directional leads in deep brain stimulation (DBS). This study aims to refine PCD-CT-based lead orientation determination using an automated method applicable to devices from various manufacturers, addressing current methodological limitations and improving neurosurgical precision.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>An automated method was developed to ascertain the orientation of directional DBS leads using PCD-CT data and grayscale model fitting for devices from Boston Scientific, Medtronic, and Abbott. A phantom study was conducted to evaluate the precision and accuracy of this method, comparing it with the stripe artifact method across different lead alignments relative to the CT gantry axis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Except for the Medtronic Sensight™ lead, where detection was occasionally unfeasible if aligned normal to the z-axis of the CT gantry, a clinically very unlikely alignment, the lead orientation could be automatically determined regardless of its position. The accuracy and precision of this automated method was comparable to those of the stripe artifact method.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>PCD-CT enables the automatic determination of lead orientation from leading manufacturers with an accuracy comparable to the stripe artifact method, and it offers the added benefit of being independent of the clinically occurring orientation of the head and, consequently, the lead relative to the CT gantry axis.</p>","PeriodicalId":22078,"journal":{"name":"Stereotactic and Functional Neurosurgery","volume":" ","pages":"55-62"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142354211","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-01-01Epub Date: 2025-04-18DOI: 10.1159/000545986
Humanitas Research Hospital S P A, Andrea Franzini, Piero Picozzi, Zefferino Rossini, Maria Pia Tropeano, Beatrice Claudia Bono, Ali Baram, Pierina Navarria, Federico Pessina
Introduction: The treatment of patients with glossopharyngeal neuralgia (GN) refractory to medical therapies is challenging. Gamma knife radiosurgery (GKRS) has emerged as an incisionless treatment option with outcomes reported in a limited number of studies. The aim of this study was to report on the outcomes of GKRS in patients with GN treated at our center.
Methods: We retrospectively reviewed all patients with GN who underwent GKRS at our center since 2017. Pain intensity was evaluated using the Barrow Neurological Institute (BNI) pain score modified for GN. Adverse events were recorded.
Results: Six patients underwent GKRS for GN at our center between 2017 and 2024. The maximum dose delivered was 85 Gy for 1 patient and 90 Gy for the others. After a median period of 2 weeks from GKRS, all patients experienced pain reduction (BNI I-IIIa). Pain recurred during follow-up in 2 patients after 9 and 3 months, respectively. Both underwent repeat GKRS, which relieved pain in one. No adverse event or neurological deficit occurred.
Conclusions: GKRS is an effective, well-tolerated treatment for patients with GN. Pain may recur over time, but more durable pain relief can be achieved with repeat GKRS.
{"title":"Gamma Knife Radiosurgery for Glossopharyngeal Neuralgia: A Retrospective Study.","authors":"Humanitas Research Hospital S P A, Andrea Franzini, Piero Picozzi, Zefferino Rossini, Maria Pia Tropeano, Beatrice Claudia Bono, Ali Baram, Pierina Navarria, Federico Pessina","doi":"10.1159/000545986","DOIUrl":"10.1159/000545986","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>The treatment of patients with glossopharyngeal neuralgia (GN) refractory to medical therapies is challenging. Gamma knife radiosurgery (GKRS) has emerged as an incisionless treatment option with outcomes reported in a limited number of studies. The aim of this study was to report on the outcomes of GKRS in patients with GN treated at our center.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We retrospectively reviewed all patients with GN who underwent GKRS at our center since 2017. Pain intensity was evaluated using the Barrow Neurological Institute (BNI) pain score modified for GN. Adverse events were recorded.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Six patients underwent GKRS for GN at our center between 2017 and 2024. The maximum dose delivered was 85 Gy for 1 patient and 90 Gy for the others. After a median period of 2 weeks from GKRS, all patients experienced pain reduction (BNI I-IIIa). Pain recurred during follow-up in 2 patients after 9 and 3 months, respectively. Both underwent repeat GKRS, which relieved pain in one. No adverse event or neurological deficit occurred.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>GKRS is an effective, well-tolerated treatment for patients with GN. Pain may recur over time, but more durable pain relief can be achieved with repeat GKRS.</p>","PeriodicalId":22078,"journal":{"name":"Stereotactic and Functional Neurosurgery","volume":" ","pages":"219-226"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143994831","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}