Stereotactic and Functional Neurosurgery最新文献

Introduction: Despite the known benefits of deep brain stimulation (DBS), the cost of the procedure can limit access and can vary widely. Our aim was to conduct a systematic review of the reported costs associated with DBS, as well as the variability in reporting cost-associated factors to ultimately increase patient access to this therapy.

Methods: A systematic review of the literature for cost of DBS treatment was conducted in accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. PubMed and Embase databases were queried. Olsen & Associates (OANDA) was used to convert all reported rates to USD. Cost was corrected for inflation using the US Bureau of Labor Statistics Inflation Calculator, correcting to April 2022.

Results: Twenty-six articles on the cost of DBS surgery from 2001 to 2021 were included. The median number of patients across studies was 193, the mean reported age was 60.5 ± 5.6 years, and median female prevalence was 38.9%. The inflation- and currency-adjusted mean cost of the DBS device was USD 21,496.07 ± USD 8,944.16, the cost of surgery alone was USD 14,685.22 ± USD 8,479.66, the total cost of surgery was USD 40,942.85 ± USD 17,987.43, and the total cost of treatment until 1 year of follow-up was USD 47,632.27 ± USD 23,067.08. There were no differences in costs observed across surgical indication or country.

Conclusion: Our report describes the large variation in DBS costs and the manner of reporting costs. The current lack of standardization impedes productive discourse as comparisons are hindered by both geographic and chronological variations. Emphasis should be put on standardized reporting and analysis of reimbursement costs to better assess the variability of DBS-associated costs in order to make this procedure more cost-effective and address areas for improvement to increase patient access to DBS.

Introduction: DBS efficacy depends on accuracy. CT-MRI fusion is established for both stereotactic registration and electrode placement verification. The desire to streamline DBS workflows, reduce operative time, and minimize patient transfers has increased interest in portable imaging modalities such as the Medtronic O-arm® and mobile CT. However, these remain expensive and bulky. 3D C-arm fluoroscopy (3DXT) units are a smaller and less costly alternative, albeit incompatible with traditional frame-based localization and without useful soft tissue resolution. We aimed to compare fusion of 3DXT and CT with pre-operative MRI to evaluate if 3DXT-MRI fusion alone is sufficient for accurate registration and reliable targeting verification. We further assess DBS targeting accuracy using a 3DXT workflow and compare radiation dosimetry between modalities.

Methods: Patients underwent robot-assisted DBS implantation using a workflow incorporating 3DXT which we describe. Two intra-operative 3DXT spins were performed for registration and accuracy verification followed by conventional CT post-operatively. Post-operative 3DXT and CT images were independently fused to the same pre-operative MRI sequence and co-ordinates generated for comparison. Registration accuracy was compared to 15 consecutive controls who underwent CT-based registration. Radial targeting accuracy was calculated and radiation dosimetry recorded.

Results: Data were obtained from 29 leads in 15 consecutive patients. 3DXT registration accuracy was significantly superior to CT with mean error 0.22 ± 0.03 mm (p < 0.0001). Mean Euclidean electrode tip position variation for CT to MRI versus 3DXT to MRI fusion was 0.62 ± 0.40 mm (range 0.0 mm-1.7 mm). In comparison, direct CT to 3DXT fusion showed electrode tip Euclidean variance of 0.23 ± 0.09 mm. Mean radial targeting accuracy assessed on 3DXT was 0.97 ± 0.54 mm versus 1.15 ± 0.55 mm on CT with differences insignificant (p = 0.30). Mean patient radiation doses were around 80% lower with 3DXT versus CT (p < 0.0001).

Discussion: Mobile 3D C-arm fluoroscopy can be safely incorporated into DBS workflows for both registration and lead verification. For registration, the limited field of view requires the use of frameless transient fiducials and is highly accurate. For lead position verification based on MRI co-registration, we estimate there is around a 0.4 mm discrepancy between lead position seen on 3DXT versus CT when corrected for brain shift. This is similar to that described in O-arm® or mobile CT series. For units where logistical or financial considerations preclude the acquisition of a cone beam CT or mobile CT scanner, our data support portable 3D C-arm fluoroscopy as an acceptable alternative with significantly lower radiation exposure.

None.

Introduction: Ablative surgery is an intervention of last resort for treatment-resistant obsessive-compulsive disorder (TROCD). Our center has been using bilateral anterior capsulotomy (BAC) for the past 20 years for patients eligible for limbic surgery. This report details our experience with BAC for TROCD.

Method: Five patients with OCD met eligibility criteria for BAC. Entry protocols were complex and took around 6 months to complete. Stereotactic radiofrequency was used to produce the capsulotomies. Lesion length varied between 5.7 and 16.9 mm in the coronal plane. Patients were followed between 4 and 20 years.

Results: All 5 patients (100%) were responders as defined by the widely accepted criteria of a reduction of ≥35% in Yale-Brown Obsessive Compulsive Scale (YBOCS) score at 18-month follow-up. Four patients remained responders at the 48 months. One patient was lost to follow-up. Responder status when viewed from the perspective of the YBOCS was sustained over the 4- to 20-year follow-up with one relapse 19 years postsurgery when medications were discontinued. Real-world psychiatric outcomes were different as other vulnerabilities surfaced illustrating the multifactorial determinants of mental health. No patient had any significant long-term neurocognitive or physical side effects.

Conclusion: BAC should remain an option of last resort for patients with severe OCD who remain unresponsive to all other interventions.

Background: Deep brain stimulation (DBS) is a highly efficient, evidence-based therapy to alleviate symptoms and improve quality of life in movement disorders such as Parkinson's disease, essential tremor, and dystonia, which is also being applied in several psychiatric disorders, such as obsessive-compulsive disorder and depression, when they are otherwise resistant to therapy.

Summary: At present, DBS is clinically applied in the so-called open-loop approach, with fixed stimulation parameters, irrespective of the patients' clinical state(s). This approach ignores the brain states or feedback from the central nervous system or peripheral recordings, thus potentially limiting its efficacy and inducing side effects by stimulation of the targeted networks below or above the therapeutic level.

Key messages: The currently emerging closed-loop (CL) approaches are designed to adapt stimulation parameters to the electrophysiological surrogates of disease symptoms and states. CL-DBS paves the way for adaptive personalized DBS protocols. This review elaborates on the perspectives of the CL technology and discusses its opportunities as well as its potential pitfalls for both clinical and research use in neuropsychiatric disorders.

Background: The National Coverage Determination (NCD) by the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) for deep brain stimulation requires that a patient have "advanced idiopathic Parkinson's disease (PD) as determined by Hoehn and Yahr (HY) stage or the Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale part III motor subscale (UPDRS III)." How to apply the HY or UPDRS III scales to define "advanced" PD is unclear.

Summary: There is an ongoing recovery audit by the CMS of deep brain stimulation cases that were covered by Medicare but are deemed not to have met the NCD requirements and therefore not to have been medically necessary. Whether a hospital is asked to refund Medicare often hinges upon whether medical documentation supports the diagnosis of advanced PD. However, neither the HY nor the UPDRS III scales use "advanced" to define or describe stages of PD. The NCD has an accompanying National Coverage Analysis that reviews the studies that inform the NCD. These studies use "advanced" as well as the HY and UPDRS III scales. This review identifies how the HY and UPDRS III scales were used to categorize advanced PD in the studies that were cited in the National Coverage Analysis.

Key messages: In the studies used for the NCD for deep brain stimulation for PD, an HY score ≥3 or a UPDRS III score ≥30 was used to describe patient cohorts considered to have advanced PD.

Introduction: Anterior nucleus of the thalamus (ANT) deep brain stimulation (DBS) is an increasingly promising treatment option for refractory epilepsy. Optimal therapeutic benefit has been associated with stimulation at the junction of ANT and the mammillothalamic tract (mtt), but electrophysiologic markers of this target are lacking. The present study examined microelectrode recordings (MER) during DBS to identify unique electrophysiologic characteristics of ANT and the ANT-mtt junction.

Methods: Ten patients with medically refractory epilepsy underwent MER during ANT-DBS implantation under general anesthesia. MER locations were determined based on coregistration of preoperative MRI, postoperative CT, and a stereotactic atlas of the thalamus (Morel atlas). Several neurophysiological parameters including single unit spiking rate, bursting properties, theta and alpha power and cerebrospinal fluid (CSF)-normalized root mean square (NRMS) of multiunit activity were characterized at recording depths and compared to anatomic boundaries.

Results: From sixteen hemispheres, 485 recordings locations were collected from a mean of 30.3 (15.64 ± 5.0 mm) recording spans. Three-hundred and ninety-four of these recording locations were utilized further for analysis of spiking and bursting rates, after excluding recordings that were more than 8 mm above the putative ventral ANT border. The ANT region exhibited discernible features including: (1) mean spiking rate (7.52 Hz ± 6.9 Hz; one-way analysis of variance test, p = 0.014 when compared to mediodorsal nucleus of the thalamus [MD], mtt, and CSF), (2) the presence of bursting activity with 40% of ANT locations (N = 59) exhibited bursting versus 24% the mtt (χ2; p < 0.001), and 32% in the MD (p = 0.38), (3) CSF-NRMS, a proxy for neuronal density, exhibited well demarcated changes near the entry and exit of ANT (linear regression, R = -0.33, p < 0.001). Finally, in the ANT, both theta (4-8 Hz) and alpha band power (9-12 Hz) were negatively correlated with distance to the ventral ANT border (linear regression, p < 0.001 for both). The proportion of recordings with spiking and bursting activity was consistently highest 0-2 mm above the ventral ANT border with the mtt.

Conclusion: We observed several electrophysiological markers demarcating the ANT superior and inferior borders including multiple single cell and local field potential features. A local maximum in neural activity just above the ANT-mtt junction was consistent with the previously described optimal target for seizure reduction. These features may be useful for successful targeting of ANT-DBS for epilepsy.

Introduction: Colloid cysts often occur in the third ventricle, and they are considered benign, slowly growing lesions. They commonly present with symptoms of intracranial hypertension and rarely sudden death due to acute hydrocephalus. The management options include cerebrospinal fluid diversion procedure by shunt, endoscopic or transcranial surgical excision, and stereotactic aspiration. Complications associated with excisional procedures make them undesirable to some patients. Stereotactic radiosurgery has emerged as a noninvasive less risky treatment option. To date, there is no clinical series in the literature reporting on this treatment modality. The aim of the study was to determine the efficacy and safety of gamma knife (GK) radiosurgery in the treatment of third ventricular colloid cysts.

Methods: This is a retrospective study involving 13 patients with third ventricular colloid cysts who underwent GK radiosurgery. GK radiosurgery was used as a primary treatment in all the patients. The median prescription dose was 12 Gy (11-12 Gy). The cyst volumes ranged from 0.2 to 10 cc (median 1.6 cc).

Results: The median follow-up was 50 months (18-108 months). Cyst control was achieved in 100% of the patients. Complete or partial response was observed in 12 patients (92%). Eight patients (62%) had hydrocephalus on imaging at the initial diagnosis. Seven of these patients had VP shunt insertion before GK. One patient required shunt insertion after GK.

Conclusion: GK for third ventricular colloid cysts is a promising treatment, regarding its efficacy and safety, to be added to other treatment options. A longer follow-up is required to confirm long-term control.