首页 > 最新文献

Surgical Laparoscopy, Endoscopy & Percutaneous Techniques最新文献

英文 中文
The Effects of Sex Hormones on Postoperative Pain in Patients with Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy. 性激素对腹腔镜胆囊切除术患者术后疼痛的影响
IF 1 4区 医学 Q2 Medicine Pub Date : 2024-02-01 DOI: 10.1097/SLE.0000000000001259
Kezban Koraş Sözen, Haci Bolat, İnayet Güntürk

Objective: There are many factors that affect postoperative pain. This study determines the effect of preoperative sex hormone levels on postoperative pain levels in patients undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy.

Patients and methods: This study included a total of 89 patients who met the study inclusion criteria. The patients were divided into 3 groups based on their sex and pre and postmenopausal periods: male patients (n = 28), postmenopausal female patients (n = 31), and female patients with normal cycles (n = 30). Normal-cycle women were also regrouped based on their follicular and luteal phases. Data were collected using a descriptive characteristics form, a patient follow-up form, and the Visual Analog Scale.

Results: Venous blood samples taken from the patients before surgery were used to measure their levels of estradiol (EST), testosterone (TES), and progesterone levels. Male patients had lower pain levels than female patients. The male patients' Visual Analog Scale scores were inversely related and correlated strongly with their TES levels ( P < 0.05). However, subgroup analyses suggested that their EST level played a primary role in males and that the EST/TES ratio was determinant in the late postoperative period. In female patients, the EST/progesterone ratio was the most determining factor for the level of pain felt in the postmenopausal period, whereas there was no change in the premenopausal period at different stages of the menstrual cycle.

Conclusions: Sex hormones were found to be effective in predicting postoperative pain severity.

目的:影响术后疼痛的因素有很多。本研究确定了腹腔镜胆囊切除术患者术前性激素水平对术后疼痛水平的影响:本研究共纳入 89 名符合研究纳入标准的患者。根据性别和绝经前后的时期将患者分为三组:男性患者(28 人)、绝经后女性患者(31 人)和周期正常的女性患者(30 人)。正常周期的女性也根据卵泡期和黄体期重新分组。数据收集采用描述性特征表、患者随访表和视觉模拟量表:手术前抽取的静脉血样本用于测量患者的雌二醇(EST)、睾酮(TES)和孕酮水平。男性患者的疼痛程度低于女性患者。男性患者的视觉模拟量表(Visual Analog Scale)评分与他们的睾酮(TES)水平成反比,并与之密切相关(P < 0.05)。然而,亚组分析表明,男性患者的EST水平起主要作用,而EST/TES比率在术后晚期起决定性作用。在女性患者中,EST/孕酮比率是绝经后疼痛程度的最大决定因素,而绝经前在月经周期的不同阶段则没有变化:结论:性激素可有效预测术后疼痛的严重程度。
{"title":"The Effects of Sex Hormones on Postoperative Pain in Patients with Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy.","authors":"Kezban Koraş Sözen, Haci Bolat, İnayet Güntürk","doi":"10.1097/SLE.0000000000001259","DOIUrl":"10.1097/SLE.0000000000001259","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>There are many factors that affect postoperative pain. This study determines the effect of preoperative sex hormone levels on postoperative pain levels in patients undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy.</p><p><strong>Patients and methods: </strong>This study included a total of 89 patients who met the study inclusion criteria. The patients were divided into 3 groups based on their sex and pre and postmenopausal periods: male patients (n = 28), postmenopausal female patients (n = 31), and female patients with normal cycles (n = 30). Normal-cycle women were also regrouped based on their follicular and luteal phases. Data were collected using a descriptive characteristics form, a patient follow-up form, and the Visual Analog Scale.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Venous blood samples taken from the patients before surgery were used to measure their levels of estradiol (EST), testosterone (TES), and progesterone levels. Male patients had lower pain levels than female patients. The male patients' Visual Analog Scale scores were inversely related and correlated strongly with their TES levels ( P < 0.05). However, subgroup analyses suggested that their EST level played a primary role in males and that the EST/TES ratio was determinant in the late postoperative period. In female patients, the EST/progesterone ratio was the most determining factor for the level of pain felt in the postmenopausal period, whereas there was no change in the premenopausal period at different stages of the menstrual cycle.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Sex hormones were found to be effective in predicting postoperative pain severity.</p>","PeriodicalId":22092,"journal":{"name":"Surgical Laparoscopy, Endoscopy & Percutaneous Techniques","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.0,"publicationDate":"2024-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"139502398","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Risk Factors for Postoperative Infections Following Appendectomy of Complicated Appendicitis: A Meta-analysis and Retrospective Single-institutional Study. 复杂性阑尾炎阑尾切除术后感染的危险因素:荟萃分析和回顾性单一机构研究。
IF 1 4区 医学 Q2 Medicine Pub Date : 2024-02-01 DOI: 10.1097/SLE.0000000000001234
Katherine Cironi, Aaron L Albuck, Bryant McLafferty, Alison K Mortemore, Christina McCarthy, Mohammad Hussein, Peter P Issa, Tyler Metz, Marcela Herrera, Eman Toraih, Sharven Taghavi, Emad Kandil, Jacquelyn Turner

Patients with complicated appendicitis have an increased risk for postoperative infections. Potential risk factors for postoperative infections through a meta-analysis and retrospective chart review are discussed. A meta-analysis consisting of 35 studies analyzing complicated appendicitis treated with an appendectomy noting at least 1 postoperative infection was performed. A retrospective review was then conducted in patients diagnosed with complicated appendicitis after appendectomy. Of 5326 patients in total, 15.4% developed postoperative infections. Laparoscopic surgery and perioperative hyperoxygenation were found to be protective factors for the development of infection. Retrospectively, 53.2% of patients presented with complicated appendicitis. Patients with complicated appendicitis were more likely to be older in age and have an increased length of stay. Patient demographics, operative time, and comorbid status had no effect on postoperative infection or readmission rate. Physicians should strongly consider minimally invasive techniques to treat all cases of complicated appendicitis irrespective of comorbidities, age, sex, or body mass index.

患有复杂阑尾炎的患者术后感染的风险增加。通过荟萃分析和回顾性图表回顾,讨论了术后感染的潜在危险因素。进行了一项荟萃分析,包括35项分析阑尾切除术治疗的复杂阑尾炎的研究,发现至少有1例术后感染。然后对阑尾切除术后诊断为复杂阑尾炎的患者进行回顾性审查。在5326名患者中,15.4%的患者出现术后感染。腹腔镜手术和围手术期高氧是感染发展的保护因素。回顾性分析,53.2%的患者表现为复杂性阑尾炎。患有复杂阑尾炎的患者年龄更大,住院时间更长。患者人口统计学、手术时间和合并症状态对术后感染或再次入院率没有影响。无论合并症、年龄、性别或体重指数如何,医生都应该大力考虑微创技术来治疗所有复杂阑尾炎病例。
{"title":"Risk Factors for Postoperative Infections Following Appendectomy of Complicated Appendicitis: A Meta-analysis and Retrospective Single-institutional Study.","authors":"Katherine Cironi, Aaron L Albuck, Bryant McLafferty, Alison K Mortemore, Christina McCarthy, Mohammad Hussein, Peter P Issa, Tyler Metz, Marcela Herrera, Eman Toraih, Sharven Taghavi, Emad Kandil, Jacquelyn Turner","doi":"10.1097/SLE.0000000000001234","DOIUrl":"10.1097/SLE.0000000000001234","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Patients with complicated appendicitis have an increased risk for postoperative infections. Potential risk factors for postoperative infections through a meta-analysis and retrospective chart review are discussed. A meta-analysis consisting of 35 studies analyzing complicated appendicitis treated with an appendectomy noting at least 1 postoperative infection was performed. A retrospective review was then conducted in patients diagnosed with complicated appendicitis after appendectomy. Of 5326 patients in total, 15.4% developed postoperative infections. Laparoscopic surgery and perioperative hyperoxygenation were found to be protective factors for the development of infection. Retrospectively, 53.2% of patients presented with complicated appendicitis. Patients with complicated appendicitis were more likely to be older in age and have an increased length of stay. Patient demographics, operative time, and comorbid status had no effect on postoperative infection or readmission rate. Physicians should strongly consider minimally invasive techniques to treat all cases of complicated appendicitis irrespective of comorbidities, age, sex, or body mass index.</p>","PeriodicalId":22092,"journal":{"name":"Surgical Laparoscopy, Endoscopy & Percutaneous Techniques","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.0,"publicationDate":"2024-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"49682525","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Impact of Standard Versus Low Pneumoperitoneum Pressure on Peritoneal Environment in Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy. Randomized Clinical Trial. 腹腔镜胆囊切除术中标准气压与低气压对腹膜环境的影响。随机临床试验。
IF 1 4区 医学 Q2 Medicine Pub Date : 2024-02-01 DOI: 10.1097/SLE.0000000000001244
Ana Belén Serrano, Óscar Díaz-Cambronero, María Montiel, José Molina, Mónica Núñez, Elena Mendía, María Nuria Mané, Eduardo Lisa, Javier Martínez-Botas, Diego Gómez-Coronado, Andrea Gaetano, María José Casarejos, Ana Gómez, Alfonso Sanjuanbenito

Background: High CO 2 pneumoperitoneum pressure during laparoscopy adversely affects the peritoneal environment. This study hypothesized that low pneumoperitoneum pressure may be linked to less peritoneal damage and possibly to better clinical outcomes.

Materials and methods: One hundred patients undergoing scheduled laparoscopic cholecystectomy were randomized 1:1 to low or to standard pneumoperitoneum pressure. Peritoneal biopsies were performed at baseline time and 1 hour after peritoneum insufflation in all patients. The primary outcome was peritoneal remodeling biomarkers and apoptotic index. Secondary outcomes included biomarker differences at the studied times and some clinical variables such as length of hospital stay, and quality and safety issues related to the procedure.

Results: Peritoneal IL6 after 1 hour of surgery was significantly higher in the standard than in the low-pressure group (4.26±1.34 vs. 3.24±1.21; P =0.001). On the contrary, levels of connective tissue growth factor and plasminogen activator inhibitor-I were higher in the low-pressure group (0.89±0.61 vs. 0.61±0.84; P =0.025, and 0.74±0.89 vs. 0.24±1.15; P =0.028, respectively). Regarding apoptotic index, similar levels were found in both groups and were 44.0±10.9 and 42.5±17.8 in low and standard pressure groups, respectively. None of the secondary outcomes showed differences between the 2 groups.

Conclusions: Peritoneal inflammation after laparoscopic cholecystectomy is higher when surgery is performed under standard pressure. Adhesion formation seems to be less in this group. The majority of patients undergoing surgery under low pressure were operated under optimal workspace conditions, regardless of the surgeon's expertise.

背景:腹腔镜检查时CO2气腹压力过高会对腹膜环境产生不利影响。本研究假设低气腹压力可能与较少的腹膜损伤有关,并可能有更好的临床结果。材料和方法:100例腹腔镜胆囊切除术患者按1:1随机分为低气压组和标准气压组。所有患者在基线时间和腹膜充气后1小时进行腹膜活检。主要终点是腹膜重塑生物标志物和凋亡指数。次要结果包括研究时间的生物标志物差异和一些临床变量,如住院时间长短,以及与手术相关的质量和安全问题。结果:标准组术后1 h腹膜il - 6明显高于低压组(4.26±1.34∶3.24±1.21;P = 0.001)。相反,低压组结缔组织生长因子和纤溶酶原激活物抑制剂- i水平较高(0.89±0.61 vs. 0.61±0.84;P=0.025, 0.74±0.89比0.24±1.15;分别为P = 0.028)。两组细胞凋亡指数相近,低压组为44.0±10.9,标准压组为42.5±17.8。两组间的次要结果均无差异。结论:标准压力下腹腔镜胆囊切除术后腹膜炎症发生率较高。粘连形成在这组中似乎较少。大多数在低压下接受手术的患者在最佳工作空间条件下进行手术,而不考虑外科医生的专业知识。
{"title":"Impact of Standard Versus Low Pneumoperitoneum Pressure on Peritoneal Environment in Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy. Randomized Clinical Trial.","authors":"Ana Belén Serrano, Óscar Díaz-Cambronero, María Montiel, José Molina, Mónica Núñez, Elena Mendía, María Nuria Mané, Eduardo Lisa, Javier Martínez-Botas, Diego Gómez-Coronado, Andrea Gaetano, María José Casarejos, Ana Gómez, Alfonso Sanjuanbenito","doi":"10.1097/SLE.0000000000001244","DOIUrl":"10.1097/SLE.0000000000001244","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>High CO 2 pneumoperitoneum pressure during laparoscopy adversely affects the peritoneal environment. This study hypothesized that low pneumoperitoneum pressure may be linked to less peritoneal damage and possibly to better clinical outcomes.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>One hundred patients undergoing scheduled laparoscopic cholecystectomy were randomized 1:1 to low or to standard pneumoperitoneum pressure. Peritoneal biopsies were performed at baseline time and 1 hour after peritoneum insufflation in all patients. The primary outcome was peritoneal remodeling biomarkers and apoptotic index. Secondary outcomes included biomarker differences at the studied times and some clinical variables such as length of hospital stay, and quality and safety issues related to the procedure.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Peritoneal IL6 after 1 hour of surgery was significantly higher in the standard than in the low-pressure group (4.26±1.34 vs. 3.24±1.21; P =0.001). On the contrary, levels of connective tissue growth factor and plasminogen activator inhibitor-I were higher in the low-pressure group (0.89±0.61 vs. 0.61±0.84; P =0.025, and 0.74±0.89 vs. 0.24±1.15; P =0.028, respectively). Regarding apoptotic index, similar levels were found in both groups and were 44.0±10.9 and 42.5±17.8 in low and standard pressure groups, respectively. None of the secondary outcomes showed differences between the 2 groups.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Peritoneal inflammation after laparoscopic cholecystectomy is higher when surgery is performed under standard pressure. Adhesion formation seems to be less in this group. The majority of patients undergoing surgery under low pressure were operated under optimal workspace conditions, regardless of the surgeon's expertise.</p>","PeriodicalId":22092,"journal":{"name":"Surgical Laparoscopy, Endoscopy & Percutaneous Techniques","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.0,"publicationDate":"2024-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"107592294","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Laparoscopic Median Arcuate Ligament Release: Surgical Technique and Clinical Outcomes. 腹腔镜正中弓状韧带松解术:手术技术与临床效果。
IF 1 4区 医学 Q2 Medicine Pub Date : 2024-02-01 DOI: 10.1097/SLE.0000000000001257
Amanda Belluzzi, Marita Salame, Kamal Abi Mosleh, Todd E Rasmussen, Michael L Kendrick, Omar M Ghanem

Background: Median arcuate ligament syndrome (MALS) is characterized by a constellation of symptoms related to the compression of the celiac artery trunk. Laparoscopic release of the ligament has demonstrated its effectiveness in alleviating these symptoms while showing lower postoperative complication rates, reduced hospital stays, and improved clinical outcomes. This study describes a single institution's experience with this procedure and reports on the preoperative assessment, surgical technique, and clinical outcomes of patients with MALS.

Methods: We performed a retrospective chart review of all patients who underwent a primary laparoscopic MAL release (MALR) at a single high-volume academic institution from June 2021 to July 2023. Patient demographics, preoperative assessment, postoperative complications, and resolution of preoperative symptoms data were collected.

Results: A total of 30 patients underwent laparoscopic MALR, with 76.7% being female and a mean age of 33.4±16.3 years. The most common presenting symptom was postprandial epigastric pain (100%), followed by abdominal pain and nausea (83.3%), among others. The preoperative evaluation for all patients included a duplex mesenteric doppler and CT angiogram during inspiration and expiration and 3D reconstruction. Successful laparoscopic decompression of the celiac artery was achieved in 96.6% of cases, with only one conversion to an open procedure. There was only one reported early (<30 d postoperatively) complication with no subsequent late complications or mortality. None of the patients required reintervention or reoperation. Only 1 patient required postoperative celiac plexus/splanchnic block injection to alleviate pain.

Conclusions: MALS can be effectively and safely managed using a laparoscopic approach when performed by an experienced minimally invasive surgeon. Further studies with longer follow-ups are needed to confirm the long-term effectiveness of this technique.

背景:腹腔正中弓状韧带综合征(MALS)的特征是与腹腔动脉干受压有关的一系列症状。腹腔镜韧带松解术已证明能有效缓解这些症状,同时还能降低术后并发症发生率、缩短住院时间并改善临床疗效。本研究介绍了一家医疗机构采用该手术的经验,并报告了 MALS 患者的术前评估、手术技巧和临床疗效:我们对 2021 年 6 月至 2023 年 7 月期间在一家高流量学术机构接受初级腹腔镜 MAL 松解术(MALR)的所有患者进行了回顾性病历审查。研究人员收集了患者的人口统计学特征、术前评估、术后并发症和术前症状缓解情况等数据:共有30名患者接受了腹腔镜MALR手术,其中76.7%为女性,平均年龄(33.4±16.3)岁。最常见的症状是餐后上腹痛(100%),其次是腹痛和恶心(83.3%)等。所有患者的术前评估都包括双工肠系膜多普勒检查、吸气和呼气时的 CT 血管造影以及三维重建。96.6%的病例成功实现了腹腔镜腹腔动脉减压,仅有一人转为开放手术。仅有一例早期报告(结论:由经验丰富的微创外科医生进行腹腔镜手术,可以有效、安全地治疗 MALS。需要进行更长时间的随访研究,以确认该技术的长期有效性。
{"title":"Laparoscopic Median Arcuate Ligament Release: Surgical Technique and Clinical Outcomes.","authors":"Amanda Belluzzi, Marita Salame, Kamal Abi Mosleh, Todd E Rasmussen, Michael L Kendrick, Omar M Ghanem","doi":"10.1097/SLE.0000000000001257","DOIUrl":"10.1097/SLE.0000000000001257","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Median arcuate ligament syndrome (MALS) is characterized by a constellation of symptoms related to the compression of the celiac artery trunk. Laparoscopic release of the ligament has demonstrated its effectiveness in alleviating these symptoms while showing lower postoperative complication rates, reduced hospital stays, and improved clinical outcomes. This study describes a single institution's experience with this procedure and reports on the preoperative assessment, surgical technique, and clinical outcomes of patients with MALS.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We performed a retrospective chart review of all patients who underwent a primary laparoscopic MAL release (MALR) at a single high-volume academic institution from June 2021 to July 2023. Patient demographics, preoperative assessment, postoperative complications, and resolution of preoperative symptoms data were collected.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 30 patients underwent laparoscopic MALR, with 76.7% being female and a mean age of 33.4±16.3 years. The most common presenting symptom was postprandial epigastric pain (100%), followed by abdominal pain and nausea (83.3%), among others. The preoperative evaluation for all patients included a duplex mesenteric doppler and CT angiogram during inspiration and expiration and 3D reconstruction. Successful laparoscopic decompression of the celiac artery was achieved in 96.6% of cases, with only one conversion to an open procedure. There was only one reported early (<30 d postoperatively) complication with no subsequent late complications or mortality. None of the patients required reintervention or reoperation. Only 1 patient required postoperative celiac plexus/splanchnic block injection to alleviate pain.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>MALS can be effectively and safely managed using a laparoscopic approach when performed by an experienced minimally invasive surgeon. Further studies with longer follow-ups are needed to confirm the long-term effectiveness of this technique.</p>","PeriodicalId":22092,"journal":{"name":"Surgical Laparoscopy, Endoscopy & Percutaneous Techniques","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.0,"publicationDate":"2024-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"139404455","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Lateral Lymph Node Dissection for Locally Advanced Rectal Carcinoma: A Step-by-Step Description of Surgical Anatomical Planes During Cadaveric Dissection and Minimally Invasive Surgery. 局部晚期直肠癌的侧淋巴结清扫术:尸体清扫和微创手术中解剖平面的逐步描述
IF 1 4区 医学 Q2 Medicine Pub Date : 2024-02-01 DOI: 10.1097/SLE.0000000000001241
Erkin İsmail, Burak Kutlu, Halil İbrahim Acar, Mehmet Yörübulut, Muzaffer Akkoca, Akin Firat Kocaay, Atilla Elhan, Mehmet Ayhan Kuzu

Purpose: Total mesorectal excision (TME) is accepted as gold standard method in rectal cancer globally. But there is no standard for lateral lymph nodes. Combination of neoadjuvant treatment plus lateral lymph node dissection (LLND) in select patients might be a promising method. Our purpose is to describe the anatomic landmarks of LLND on cadavers and minimally invasive surgery.

Materials and methods: Local advanced rectal cancer and lateral lymph node (LLN) metastasis are accepted as an indication of neoadjuvant treatment. LLND was performed according to preoperative imaging after radiochemotherapy.

Results: Twenty-eight (10.5%) of 267 patients with rectal cancer who had suspected lateral lymph node metastasis (LLNM) with magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) underwent LLND in addition to TME after neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy. Eight of them had LLNM. Three patients had bilateral LLND and only 1 had LLNM. The median number of harvested lymph nodes was 6. The rates of LLNM increased with the presence of poor prognosis markers. One regional and 1 distant recurrence were detected in patients who had no LLN metastasis compared with2 regional and 4 distant recurrences in the LLN-positive group.

Conclusions: Local advanced rectal cancer cases may benefit from LLND, but it does not appear to have an effect on overall survival. There is no consensus whether size and/or morphologic criteria in MRI are the ideal guide for LLND.

目的:全直肠系膜切除术(TME)是全球公认的直肠癌金标准方法。但对于侧淋巴结却没有标准。新辅助治疗加侧淋巴结清扫术(LLND)联合应用于部分患者可能是一种很有前景的方法。我们的目的是描述 LLND 在尸体上的解剖标志和微创手术:局部晚期直肠癌和侧淋巴结(LLN)转移是新辅助治疗的适应症。结果:28例(10.5%)患者在放化疗后根据术前造影进行了LLND手术:267名直肠癌患者中有28名(10.5%)通过磁共振成像(MRI)怀疑有侧淋巴结转移(LLNM),他们在新辅助化放疗后除了接受TME治疗外,还接受了LLND治疗。其中八名患者出现了 LLNM。3名患者进行了双侧LLND,只有1名患者进行了LLNM。随着预后不良指标的出现,LLNM的发生率也随之升高。未发现LLN转移的患者有1例区域性复发和1例远处复发,而LLN阳性组有2例区域性复发和4例远处复发:结论:局部晚期直肠癌病例可从 LLND 中获益,但似乎对总生存率没有影响。磁共振成像的大小和/或形态学标准是否是 LLND 的理想指南,目前尚未达成共识。
{"title":"Lateral Lymph Node Dissection for Locally Advanced Rectal Carcinoma: A Step-by-Step Description of Surgical Anatomical Planes During Cadaveric Dissection and Minimally Invasive Surgery.","authors":"Erkin İsmail, Burak Kutlu, Halil İbrahim Acar, Mehmet Yörübulut, Muzaffer Akkoca, Akin Firat Kocaay, Atilla Elhan, Mehmet Ayhan Kuzu","doi":"10.1097/SLE.0000000000001241","DOIUrl":"10.1097/SLE.0000000000001241","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Total mesorectal excision (TME) is accepted as gold standard method in rectal cancer globally. But there is no standard for lateral lymph nodes. Combination of neoadjuvant treatment plus lateral lymph node dissection (LLND) in select patients might be a promising method. Our purpose is to describe the anatomic landmarks of LLND on cadavers and minimally invasive surgery.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>Local advanced rectal cancer and lateral lymph node (LLN) metastasis are accepted as an indication of neoadjuvant treatment. LLND was performed according to preoperative imaging after radiochemotherapy.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Twenty-eight (10.5%) of 267 patients with rectal cancer who had suspected lateral lymph node metastasis (LLNM) with magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) underwent LLND in addition to TME after neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy. Eight of them had LLNM. Three patients had bilateral LLND and only 1 had LLNM. The median number of harvested lymph nodes was 6. The rates of LLNM increased with the presence of poor prognosis markers. One regional and 1 distant recurrence were detected in patients who had no LLN metastasis compared with2 regional and 4 distant recurrences in the LLN-positive group.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Local advanced rectal cancer cases may benefit from LLND, but it does not appear to have an effect on overall survival. There is no consensus whether size and/or morphologic criteria in MRI are the ideal guide for LLND.</p>","PeriodicalId":22092,"journal":{"name":"Surgical Laparoscopy, Endoscopy & Percutaneous Techniques","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.0,"publicationDate":"2024-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"138886061","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Surgical Outcomes of Laparoscopic-assisted Distal Gastrectomy Versus Totally Laparoscopic Distal Gastrectomy Billroth I for Gastric Cancer. 腹腔镜辅助远端胃切除术与全腹腔镜远端胃切除术比洛斯I型治疗胃癌的手术效果。
IF 1 4区 医学 Q2 Medicine Pub Date : 2024-02-01 DOI: 10.1097/SLE.0000000000001255
Ahmed Motamiez, Doaa Maximous, Ahmed A S Salem, Badawy M Ahmed, Seong-Ho Kong, Do Joong Park, Hyuk-Joon Lee, Han-Kwang Yang

Objective: The present study aimed to compare intraoperative and postoperative outcomes of laparoscopic-assisted distal gastrectomy versus totally laparoscopic distal gastrectomy (TLDG) Billroth I (BI) for gastric cancer and to assess the impact of the initial introduction phase of TLDG BI anastomosis.

Patients and methods: The study analyzed the prospectively collected data of patients who underwent laparoscopic distal gastrectomy BI from 2014 to 2021 at Seoul National University Hospital.

Results: Among 1116 patients, laparoscopic-assisted distal gastrectomy BI was performed in 566 patients and TLDG BI was performed in 550 patients. The total laparoscopic arm had a faster mean operative time (190 vs 208 min; P < 0.001) and a shorter postoperative hospital stay (7.4 vs 7.9 d; P < 0.001). Local complications were higher in the total laparoscopic group (17.6% vs 9.9%; P = 0.008) during the early introduction phase.

Conclusion: The total laparoscopic approach for BI reconstruction is safe and effective with faster operative time, shorter hospital stays, and less wound infection, but it may be associated with an increase in postoperative surgical complications and hospital stay in the early introduction phase.

研究目的本研究旨在比较腹腔镜辅助远端胃切除术与全腹腔镜远端胃切除术(TLDG)Billroth I(BI)治疗胃癌的术中和术后效果,并评估TLDG BI吻合术初始导入阶段的影响:研究分析了2014年至2021年在首尔大学医院接受腹腔镜远端胃切除术BI的患者的前瞻性数据:在1116名患者中,566名患者接受了腹腔镜辅助远端胃切除术,550名患者接受了TLDG远端胃切除术。全腹腔镜手术组的平均手术时间更短(190 分钟对 208 分钟;P < 0.001),术后住院时间更短(7.4 天对 7.9 天;P < 0.001)。在早期引入阶段,全腹腔镜组的局部并发症较高(17.6% vs 9.9%; P = 0.008):结论:全腹腔镜方法用于 BI 重建安全有效,手术时间更快,住院时间更短,伤口感染更少,但在早期引入阶段可能会增加术后并发症和住院时间。
{"title":"Surgical Outcomes of Laparoscopic-assisted Distal Gastrectomy Versus Totally Laparoscopic Distal Gastrectomy Billroth I for Gastric Cancer.","authors":"Ahmed Motamiez, Doaa Maximous, Ahmed A S Salem, Badawy M Ahmed, Seong-Ho Kong, Do Joong Park, Hyuk-Joon Lee, Han-Kwang Yang","doi":"10.1097/SLE.0000000000001255","DOIUrl":"10.1097/SLE.0000000000001255","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>The present study aimed to compare intraoperative and postoperative outcomes of laparoscopic-assisted distal gastrectomy versus totally laparoscopic distal gastrectomy (TLDG) Billroth I (BI) for gastric cancer and to assess the impact of the initial introduction phase of TLDG BI anastomosis.</p><p><strong>Patients and methods: </strong>The study analyzed the prospectively collected data of patients who underwent laparoscopic distal gastrectomy BI from 2014 to 2021 at Seoul National University Hospital.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among 1116 patients, laparoscopic-assisted distal gastrectomy BI was performed in 566 patients and TLDG BI was performed in 550 patients. The total laparoscopic arm had a faster mean operative time (190 vs 208 min; P < 0.001) and a shorter postoperative hospital stay (7.4 vs 7.9 d; P < 0.001). Local complications were higher in the total laparoscopic group (17.6% vs 9.9%; P = 0.008) during the early introduction phase.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The total laparoscopic approach for BI reconstruction is safe and effective with faster operative time, shorter hospital stays, and less wound infection, but it may be associated with an increase in postoperative surgical complications and hospital stay in the early introduction phase.</p>","PeriodicalId":22092,"journal":{"name":"Surgical Laparoscopy, Endoscopy & Percutaneous Techniques","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.0,"publicationDate":"2024-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"138886062","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Transanal Total Mesorectal Excision With Delayed Coloanal Anastomosis (TaTME-DCAA) Versus Laparoscopic Total Mesorectal Excision (LTME) and Robotic Total Mesorectal Excision (RTME) for Low Rectal Cancer: A Propensity Score-Matched Analysis of Short-term Outcomes, Bowel Function, and Cost. 经肛直肠全肠系膜切除术伴延迟结肠肛管吻合术(TaTME-DCAA)与腹腔镜全肠系膜切除术(LTME)和机器人全肠系膜切除术(RTME)治疗低位直肠癌:短期预后、肠功能和成本的倾向评分匹配分析
IF 1 4区 医学 Q2 Medicine Pub Date : 2024-02-01 DOI: 10.1097/SLE.0000000000001247
Isaac Seow-En, Jingting Wu, Ivan En-Howe Tan, Yun Zhao, Aaron Wei Ming Seah, Ian Jun Yan Wee, Yvonne Ying-Ru Ng, Emile Kwong-Wei Tan

Introduction: Total mesorectal excision (TME) with delayed coloanal anastomosis (DCAA) is surgical option for low rectal cancer, replacing conventional immediate coloanal anastomosis (ICAA) with bowel diversion. This study aimed to assess the outcomes of transanal TME (TaTME) with DCAA versus laparoscopic TME (LTME) with ICAA versus robotic TME (RTME) with ICAA.

Methods: This was a retrospective propensity score-matched analysis of patients who underwent elective TaTME-DCAA between November 2021 and June 2022. Patients were propensity-score matched in a ratio of 1:3 to patients who underwent LTME-ICAA and RTME-ICAA from January 2019 to December 2020. Outcome measures were histopathologic results, postoperative morbidity, function, and inpatient costs.

Results: Twelve patients in the TaTME-DCAA group were compared with 36 patients in the LTME-ICAA and RTME-ICAA groups each after propensity score matching. Histopathologic results and postoperative morbidity rates were statistically similar. Overall stoma-related complication rates in the ICAA groups were 11%. Median total length of hospital stays for TME plus stoma reversal surgery was similar across all techniques (10 vs. 10 vs. 9 days; P =0.532). Despite a significantly shorter duration of follow-up, bowel function after TaTME-DCAA was comparable to that of LTME-ICAA and RTME-ICAA. Overall median inpatient costs of TaTME-DCAA were comparable to LTME-ICAA and significantly cheaper than RTME-ICAA ($31,087 vs. $29,927 vs. $36,750; P =0.002).

Conclusions: TaTME with DCAA is a feasible and safe technique compared with other minimally invasive methods of TME, while avoiding bowel diversion and stoma-related complications, as well as comparing favorably in terms of overall hospitalization costs.

简介:全肠系膜切除(TME)与延迟结肠肛管吻合术(DCAA)是低位直肠癌的手术选择,取代传统的直接结肠肛管吻合术(ICAA)与肠分流。本研究旨在评估经肛门TME (TaTME)联合DCAA与腹腔镜TME (LTME)联合ICAA与机器人TME (RTME)联合ICAA的结果。方法:对2021年11月至2022年6月期间接受选择性TaTME-DCAA治疗的患者进行回顾性倾向评分匹配分析。在2019年1月至2020年12月期间,患者与接受LTME-ICAA和RTME-ICAA的患者以1:3的比例进行倾向评分匹配。结果测量为组织病理学结果、术后发病率、功能和住院费用。结果:倾向评分匹配后,TaTME-DCAA组12例患者与LTME-ICAA组和RTME-ICAA组各36例患者进行比较。组织病理学结果和术后发病率在统计学上相似。ICAA组的总体造口相关并发症发生率为11%。TME加造口逆转手术的中位总住院时间在所有技术中相似(10天vs. 10天vs. 9天;P = 0.532)。尽管随访时间明显缩短,但TaTME-DCAA后的肠功能与LTME-ICAA和RTME-ICAA相当。TaTME-DCAA的总体住院费用中位数与LTME-ICAA相当,且显著低于LTME-ICAA(31,087美元vs 29,927美元vs 36,750美元;P = 0.002)。结论:与其他微创TME方法相比,TaTME联合DCAA是一种可行且安全的技术,可避免肠转移和造口相关并发症,且在总住院费用方面具有优势。
{"title":"Transanal Total Mesorectal Excision With Delayed Coloanal Anastomosis (TaTME-DCAA) Versus Laparoscopic Total Mesorectal Excision (LTME) and Robotic Total Mesorectal Excision (RTME) for Low Rectal Cancer: A Propensity Score-Matched Analysis of Short-term Outcomes, Bowel Function, and Cost.","authors":"Isaac Seow-En, Jingting Wu, Ivan En-Howe Tan, Yun Zhao, Aaron Wei Ming Seah, Ian Jun Yan Wee, Yvonne Ying-Ru Ng, Emile Kwong-Wei Tan","doi":"10.1097/SLE.0000000000001247","DOIUrl":"10.1097/SLE.0000000000001247","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Total mesorectal excision (TME) with delayed coloanal anastomosis (DCAA) is surgical option for low rectal cancer, replacing conventional immediate coloanal anastomosis (ICAA) with bowel diversion. This study aimed to assess the outcomes of transanal TME (TaTME) with DCAA versus laparoscopic TME (LTME) with ICAA versus robotic TME (RTME) with ICAA.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This was a retrospective propensity score-matched analysis of patients who underwent elective TaTME-DCAA between November 2021 and June 2022. Patients were propensity-score matched in a ratio of 1:3 to patients who underwent LTME-ICAA and RTME-ICAA from January 2019 to December 2020. Outcome measures were histopathologic results, postoperative morbidity, function, and inpatient costs.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Twelve patients in the TaTME-DCAA group were compared with 36 patients in the LTME-ICAA and RTME-ICAA groups each after propensity score matching. Histopathologic results and postoperative morbidity rates were statistically similar. Overall stoma-related complication rates in the ICAA groups were 11%. Median total length of hospital stays for TME plus stoma reversal surgery was similar across all techniques (10 vs. 10 vs. 9 days; P =0.532). Despite a significantly shorter duration of follow-up, bowel function after TaTME-DCAA was comparable to that of LTME-ICAA and RTME-ICAA. Overall median inpatient costs of TaTME-DCAA were comparable to LTME-ICAA and significantly cheaper than RTME-ICAA ($31,087 vs. $29,927 vs. $36,750; P =0.002).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>TaTME with DCAA is a feasible and safe technique compared with other minimally invasive methods of TME, while avoiding bowel diversion and stoma-related complications, as well as comparing favorably in terms of overall hospitalization costs.</p>","PeriodicalId":22092,"journal":{"name":"Surgical Laparoscopy, Endoscopy & Percutaneous Techniques","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.0,"publicationDate":"2024-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10829900/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"138177327","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
The Efficacy of Acupressure for Nausea and Vomiting After Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy: A Meta-analysis Study. 穴位按摩对腹腔镜胆囊切除术后恶心和呕吐的疗效:一项 Meta 分析研究。
IF 1 4区 医学 Q2 Medicine Pub Date : 2023-12-14 DOI: 10.1097/sle.0000000000001196
Bufei Zhao, Tianshi Zhao, Hua Yang, Xiaojuan Fu
This meta-analysis aims to explore the impact of acupressure on nausea and vomiting for patients undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC).
这项荟萃分析旨在探讨穴位按摩对腹腔镜胆囊切除术(LC)患者恶心和呕吐的影响。
{"title":"The Efficacy of Acupressure for Nausea and Vomiting After Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy: A Meta-analysis Study.","authors":"Bufei Zhao, Tianshi Zhao, Hua Yang, Xiaojuan Fu","doi":"10.1097/sle.0000000000001196","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1097/sle.0000000000001196","url":null,"abstract":"This meta-analysis aims to explore the impact of acupressure on nausea and vomiting for patients undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC).","PeriodicalId":22092,"journal":{"name":"Surgical Laparoscopy, Endoscopy & Percutaneous Techniques","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.0,"publicationDate":"2023-12-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"138686457","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Risk Factors of Acute Pain in Elderly Patients After Laparoscopic Radical Resection of Colorectal Cancer. 腹腔镜结直肠癌根治术后老年患者急性疼痛的风险因素。
IF 1 4区 医学 Q2 Medicine Pub Date : 2023-12-13 DOI: 10.1097/sle.0000000000001254
Qian-Qian Zhu, Li Qu, Tao Su, Xuan Zhao, Xue-Ping Ma, Zhe Chen, Juan Fu, Gui-Ping Xu
To investigate the risk factors of acute pain after laparoscopic radical resection of colorectal cancer (CRC) in elderly patients.
研究老年患者腹腔镜结直肠癌根治术后急性疼痛的风险因素。
{"title":"Risk Factors of Acute Pain in Elderly Patients After Laparoscopic Radical Resection of Colorectal Cancer.","authors":"Qian-Qian Zhu, Li Qu, Tao Su, Xuan Zhao, Xue-Ping Ma, Zhe Chen, Juan Fu, Gui-Ping Xu","doi":"10.1097/sle.0000000000001254","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1097/sle.0000000000001254","url":null,"abstract":"To investigate the risk factors of acute pain after laparoscopic radical resection of colorectal cancer (CRC) in elderly patients.","PeriodicalId":22092,"journal":{"name":"Surgical Laparoscopy, Endoscopy & Percutaneous Techniques","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.0,"publicationDate":"2023-12-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"138686235","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
A Novel Method for Thoracoscopic Overlap Esophagogastric Reconstruction With Pleural Closure following Minimally Invasive Ivor-Lewis Esophagectomy for Esophagogastric Junction Cancer. 微创艾弗-刘易斯食管切除术治疗食管胃交界癌后胸腔镜食管胃重叠重建与胸膜闭合的新方法
IF 1 4区 医学 Q2 Medicine Pub Date : 2023-12-12 DOI: 10.1097/sle.0000000000001250
Akihiko Sano, Makoto Sohda, Nobuhiro Hosoi, Kohei Tateno, Takayoshi Watanabe, Nobuhiro Nakazawa, Ikuma Shioi, Yuta Shibasaki, Takuhisa Okada, Katsuya Osone, Takuya Shiraishi, Makoto Sakai, Hiroomi Ogawa, Hiroshi Okabe, Ken Shirabe, Hiroshi Saeki
Intrathoracic esophagogastric anastomosis following minimally invasive Ivor-Lewis esophagectomy is a technically demanding surgical technique that can result in serious intrathoracic infections when anastomotic leakage occurs. Herein, we report a novel side-overlap esophagogastric anastomosis with pleural closure for esophagogastric junction cancer.
微创艾佛-刘易斯(Ivor-Lewis)食管切除术后的胸腔内食管胃吻合术是一项技术要求很高的手术技术,一旦发生吻合口漏,可能会导致严重的胸腔内感染。在此,我们报告了一种新颖的侧翻食管胃吻合术,并对食管胃交界处癌症进行了胸膜封闭。
{"title":"A Novel Method for Thoracoscopic Overlap Esophagogastric Reconstruction With Pleural Closure following Minimally Invasive Ivor-Lewis Esophagectomy for Esophagogastric Junction Cancer.","authors":"Akihiko Sano, Makoto Sohda, Nobuhiro Hosoi, Kohei Tateno, Takayoshi Watanabe, Nobuhiro Nakazawa, Ikuma Shioi, Yuta Shibasaki, Takuhisa Okada, Katsuya Osone, Takuya Shiraishi, Makoto Sakai, Hiroomi Ogawa, Hiroshi Okabe, Ken Shirabe, Hiroshi Saeki","doi":"10.1097/sle.0000000000001250","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1097/sle.0000000000001250","url":null,"abstract":"Intrathoracic esophagogastric anastomosis following minimally invasive Ivor-Lewis esophagectomy is a technically demanding surgical technique that can result in serious intrathoracic infections when anastomotic leakage occurs. Herein, we report a novel side-overlap esophagogastric anastomosis with pleural closure for esophagogastric junction cancer.","PeriodicalId":22092,"journal":{"name":"Surgical Laparoscopy, Endoscopy & Percutaneous Techniques","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.0,"publicationDate":"2023-12-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"138686453","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
期刊
Surgical Laparoscopy, Endoscopy & Percutaneous Techniques
全部 Acc. Chem. Res. ACS Applied Bio Materials ACS Appl. Electron. Mater. ACS Appl. Energy Mater. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces ACS Appl. Nano Mater. ACS Appl. Polym. Mater. ACS BIOMATER-SCI ENG ACS Catal. ACS Cent. Sci. ACS Chem. Biol. ACS Chemical Health & Safety ACS Chem. Neurosci. ACS Comb. Sci. ACS Earth Space Chem. ACS Energy Lett. ACS Infect. Dis. ACS Macro Lett. ACS Mater. Lett. ACS Med. Chem. Lett. ACS Nano ACS Omega ACS Photonics ACS Sens. ACS Sustainable Chem. Eng. ACS Synth. Biol. Anal. Chem. BIOCHEMISTRY-US Bioconjugate Chem. BIOMACROMOLECULES Chem. Res. Toxicol. Chem. Rev. Chem. Mater. CRYST GROWTH DES ENERG FUEL Environ. Sci. Technol. Environ. Sci. Technol. Lett. Eur. J. Inorg. Chem. IND ENG CHEM RES Inorg. Chem. J. Agric. Food. Chem. J. Chem. Eng. Data J. Chem. Educ. J. Chem. Inf. Model. J. Chem. Theory Comput. J. Med. Chem. J. Nat. Prod. J PROTEOME RES J. Am. Chem. Soc. LANGMUIR MACROMOLECULES Mol. Pharmaceutics Nano Lett. Org. Lett. ORG PROCESS RES DEV ORGANOMETALLICS J. Org. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. A J. Phys. Chem. B J. Phys. Chem. C J. Phys. Chem. Lett. Analyst Anal. Methods Biomater. Sci. Catal. Sci. Technol. Chem. Commun. Chem. Soc. Rev. CHEM EDUC RES PRACT CRYSTENGCOMM Dalton Trans. Energy Environ. Sci. ENVIRON SCI-NANO ENVIRON SCI-PROC IMP ENVIRON SCI-WAT RES Faraday Discuss. Food Funct. Green Chem. Inorg. Chem. Front. Integr. Biol. J. Anal. At. Spectrom. J. Mater. Chem. A J. Mater. Chem. B J. Mater. Chem. C Lab Chip Mater. Chem. Front. Mater. Horiz. MEDCHEMCOMM Metallomics Mol. Biosyst. Mol. Syst. Des. Eng. Nanoscale Nanoscale Horiz. Nat. Prod. Rep. New J. Chem. Org. Biomol. Chem. Org. Chem. Front. PHOTOCH PHOTOBIO SCI PCCP Polym. Chem.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1