Surgical Laparoscopy, Endoscopy & Percutaneous Techniques最新文献

Background: It aimed to evaluate the relationship between the systemic inflammatory markers and the lymph node metastasis in clinical stages I to II right-sided colon cancers.

Patients and methods: A total of 51 eligible clinical stages I to II right-side located colon cancer patients were included in the study. Complete mesocolic excision and central vascular ligation procedures were performed in all cases. All the patients were divided into 2 main groups, pN - (n = 22) and pN + (n = 29). Demographic parameters, preoperative serum-based inflammatory biomarkers, and histopathological findings were compared between the groups.

Results: The mean age was 61.0 (54 to 71) years. Of the patients, 51.0% (26/51) were females. The open surgical approach was performed on 54.9% (28/51) of the patients and 45.1% (23/51) was performed laparoscopy. The mean total number of retrieved lymph nodes was 29.1. The lympho-vascular invasion was significantly higher in the pN + group (89.7% vs 50.0%). There were no significant differences in neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio, C-reactive protein-to-albumin ratio, mean platelet volume-to-platelet ratio, hemoglobine-albuminelymphocyte-platelet score, systemic inflammation index, lymphocyte-to-monocyte ratio, neutrophil-to-monocyte ratio, lymphocyte-to-C-reactive protein ratio (LCR), neutrophil-to-albumin ratio, and prognostic nutritional index. However, the mean platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio (PLR) was significantly lower in the pN + group (pN - : 282.1 vs pN + : 218.7, P = 0.048). The cutoff value for PLR was determined as 220 according to receiver operating characteristic analysis, with a 63.6% sensitivity and 65.6% specificity.

Conclusion: Although it has limited sensitivity and specificity, decreased preoperative PLR was significantly associated with lymph node metastasis in patients with clinical stages I to II right-sided colon cancer. It should be considered as a biomarker for nodal involvement when planning treatment strategies.

Objectives: As one of the most serious complications of rectal cancer (RC) surgery, preventing anastomotic leakage (AL) is crucial. Several studies have suggested a positive role of the transanal drainage tube (TaDT) in AL prevention. However, whether TaDT is beneficial for AL in patients with RC remains controversial. The present study aimed to evaluate the clinical impact of TaDT on AL following minimally invasive resection without diverting stoma (DS) in patients with RC.

Materials and methods: We retrospectively analyzed 392 consecutive patients with RC who had undergone minimally invasive resection without DS between 2010 and 2021. Propensity score matching (PSM) was performed to reduce selection bias. AL was classified as grade A, B, or C.

Results: A TaDT was used in 214 patients overall. After PSM, we enrolled 316 patients (n=158 in each group). Before PSM, significant group-dependent differences were observed in terms of age, American Society of Anesthesiologists physical status, and the use of antiplatelet/anticoagulant agents. The frequency of AL was 7.3% in the overall cohort and was significantly lower in the TaDT group (3.7%) than in the non-TaDT group (11.8%). The rate of grade B AL was significantly lower in the TaDT group than in the non-TaDT group (before PSM, P <0.01; after PSM, P =0.02). However, no significant differences between groups were found for grade C AL. Moreover, multivariate analysis identified the lack of a TaDT as an independent risk factor for AL in the overall and matched cohorts [before PSM, odds ratio, 3.64, P <0.01; after PSM, odds ratio, 2.91, P =0.02].

Conclusion: These results indicated that TaDT may play a beneficial role in preventing AL, particularly of grade B, for patients with RC undergoing minimally invasive resection without DS. However, further randomized controlled trials, including patient-reported outcomes, are still needed to understand better the role of TaDT in preventing ALs in patients with RC undergoing minimally invasive resection without DS.

Background: Peroral endoscopic myotomy (POEM) is a relatively new but increasingly therapeutic option for achalasia. In recent years, POEM has been used for nonachalasia esophageal motility disorders (NAEMDs), such as diffuse esophageal spasm, esophagogastric junction outlet obstruction, and hypercontractile disorder, with some clinical success. No studies thus far compare the outcomes of these two groups. We perform the first head-to-head comparison of outcomes after POEM in patients with achalasia and NAEMD.

Patients and methods: A retrospective analysis of all patients undergoing POEM at one university hospital by a single expert endoscopist from July 2021 to December 2022 was performed. All patients were symptomatic, and the presence of esophageal motility disorders was confirmed using multiple diagnostic modalities. These patients were then divided into 2 groups, achalasia and NAEMD, based on the underlying diagnosis. Statistical analysis of different clinical outcomes, including effectiveness and safety, was performed.

Results: Thirty-seven patients (mean age: 59.55, females: 22) underwent POEM in the study period. Twenty patients had achalasia and 17 patients had NAEMD. The median myotomy length was 5.5 cm for the achalasia group and 10 cm for the NAEMD group. This excluded patients with esophagogastric junction outlet obstruction in which the median myotomy length was 3 cm. The procedure time, the duration of hospital stays, the rates of same-day discharge, and complications were similar between the two. Short-term outcomes of POEM for the two groups were similar with improvement in 94% of patients in the achalasia group and 93.75% in the NAEMD group.

Conclusion: Contrary to prior observations, our study highlights that POEM is equally effective in achieving clinical improvement in patients with NAEMD as achalasia over 6 months of follow-up. In addition, POEM has a comparable safety profile in both patient groups making it a feasible therapeutic option for these debilitating and challenging disorders.

Background: Liver abscess is usually treated with medical therapy. Few patients require drainage of the collection due to large size, certain high-risk location or rupture of the collection. Percutaneous drainage is most commonly used modality for the drainage of such collection. However, caudate lobe poses a unique difficulty in percutaneous drainage due to its deep location.

Methods: We did a retrospective analysis of all patients with caudate lobe abscess who underwent endoscopic ultrasound (EUS)-guided drainage at our center. We reviewed their indications, technical and clinical success rates of the procedure from 2020 to 2023. We also performed systemic review of published literature till June 12, 2023 showing use of EUS-guided drainage of caudate lobe abscess.

Results: Total of 8 patients (age: 37.33 ± 12.8 y; Males 62.5%) underwent EUS-guided drainage of caudate lobe collection at our center. Six patients underwent drainage using plastic stents, 1 patient underwent using metal stent, and 1 patient had aspiration of the abscess. Technical success was achieved in all patients. One patient succumbed to background illness and clinical success could be achieved in rest of the patients. In systemic review of literature on EUS-guided drainage of caudate lobe, a total of 10 studies (17 patients) were included. All patients achieved technical success. Majority studies reported use of plastic stents or naso-cystic drains whereas only 1 case reported use of metal stents. One procedure related complication (localized para-esophageal abscess) was reported requiring endoscopic intervention for management.

Conclusion: EUS-guided drainage of caudate lobe abscess is safe and effective. It should be used as a first-line intervention after a failed medical management.

Purpose: Obesity is one of the most important risk factors for complications after ventral hernia repair (VHR), and minimally invasive (MIS) techniques are preferred in obese patients as they minimize wound complications. It is common practice to attempt weight loss to achieve a specific body mass index (BMI) goal; however, patients are often unable to reach it and fail to become surgical candidates. Therefore, we aim to perform a meta-analysis of studies comparing outcomes of obese and nonobese patients undergoing laparoscopic or robotic VHR.

Patients and methods: A literature search of PubMed, Scopus, and Cochrane Library databases was performed to identify studies comparing obese and nonobese patients undergoing MIS VHR. Postoperative outcomes were assessed by means of pooled analysis and meta-analysis. Statistical analysis was performed using RevMan 5.4. Heterogeneity was assessed with I2 statistics.

Results: A total of 6483 studies were screened and 26 were thoroughly reviewed. Eleven studies and 3199 patients were included in the meta-analysis. BMI >40 kg/m 2 cutoff analysis included 5 studies and 1533 patients; no differences in hernia recurrence [odds ratios (OR): 1.64; 95% CI: 0.57-4.68; P = 0.36; I2 = 47%), seroma, hematoma, and surgical site infection (SSI) rates were noted. BMI >35 kg/m 2 cutoff analysis included 5 studies and 1403 patients; no differences in hernia recurrence (OR: 1.24; 95% CI: 0.71-2.16; P = 0.58; I2 = 0%), seroma, hematoma, and SSI rates were noted. BMI >30 kg/m 2 cutoff analysis included 4 studies and 385 patients; no differences in hernia recurrence (OR: 2.07; 95% CI: 0.5-8.54; P = 0.32; I2 = 0%), seroma, hematoma, and SSI rates were noted.

Conclusion: Patients with high BMI undergoing MIS VHR have similar hernia recurrence, seroma, hematoma, and SSI rates compared with patients with lower BMI. Further prospective studies with long-term follow-up and patient-reported outcomes are required to establish optimal management in obese patients undergoing VHR.

Objective: The aim of this study was to evaluate the influence of transoral endoscopic thyroidectomy vestibular approach (TOETVA) on voice changes and swallowing function disorders.

Materials and methods: We retrospectively reviewed 215 patients who underwent thyroid surgery with TOETVA (105 cases, endoscopic group) and open approach (110 cases, open group). Major outcomes, the changes in voice and swallowing function in the 2 groups of patients before and after surgery were analyzed by using both subjective and objective evaluation indexes. Subjective evaluation indexes included the Voice Handicap Index, voice GRBAS (Grade, Roughness, Breathiness, Asthenia, Strain) classification, and swallowing impairment score; the objective indicators included the fundamental frequency (F0), fundamental frequency perturbation (jitter), amplitude perturbation (shimmer), and maximum phonation time.

Results: In terms of subjective evaluation indexes, there were no significant differences (all P> 0.05) between the groups regarding Voice Handicap Index (1 and 3 mo after surgery) and GRBAS (1 and 3 mo after surgery). The incidence rates of swallowing disorder in the endoscopic group were higher than that in the open group according to the outcomes of swallowing impairment score at 1 and 3 months after surgery (both P< 0.05). In addition, no significant changes in terms of jitter, shimmer, and maximum phonation time in both groups of patients at 1 and 3 months after surgery compared with their preoperative values (all P> 0.05).

Conclusions: Voice and swallowing disorders may occur in some patients, either TOETVA or open thyroid surgery, which in most cases will recover within 3 months after surgery. The time to swallowing function recovery is relatively prolonged in patients following TOETVA, which may be probably associated with neck adhesion and fixation after the operation.

Background: Patients who have gastric cancer with outlet obstruction (GCOO) and bulky N2 metastases cannot undergo curative resection and tolerate chemotherapy poorly, which may be improved by multimodality therapy (MMT) combined with laparoscopic gastrectomy.

Patients and methods: The records of patients with GCOO and bulky N2 metastases who received MMT including nasojejunal feeding combined with preoperative chemotherapy (PCT), followed by laparoscopic exploration [enteral nutritional (EN) group] in sequence or laparoscopic gastrojejunostomy (LGJ) before PCT plus laparoscopic gastrectomy (LGJ group) were retrospectively reviewed. Prognostic Nutritional Index, gastric outlet obstruction scoring system grade, quality of life, response to PCT, surgical outcomes, and long-term survival were analyzed.

Results: Fifty-four consecutive patients with GCOO and bulky N2 metastases were identified. The Prognostic Nutritional Index and Nutritional Risk Screening-2002 score of patients were significantly improved as a result of multimodal therapy, but no superiority was demonstrated between the EN group and the LGJ group. The quality of life (52.6 ± 11.4 vs 68.2 ± 13.5, P = 0.036) and gastric outlet obstruction scoring system (P < 0.05) of patients in the LGJ group were better compared with the EN group. The rate of laparoscopic D2 gastrectomy (94.3% vs 92.9%, P = 0.64) and R0 resection (91.4% vs 92.9%, P = 0.53) in the EN group was similar to the LGJ group. There were no significant differences for the 5-year overall survival rate (63.2% vs 57.1, P = 0.86) and the 5-year relapse-free survival rate (42.9% vs 53.8%, P = 0.54) of patients in the EN group compared with the LGJ group.

Conclusions: MMT including EN support or laparoscopic gastrojejunostomy followed by laparoscopic D2 gastrectomy is a feasible and effective treatment for patients with GCOO and bulky N2 metastases.