Surgery最新文献

Background: The relationship of sarcopenia to frailty and other survival determinants in patients waitlisted for kidney transplant is not well characterized. Our goal was to evaluate the relationship of muscle area to functional and frailty metrics and its impact on survival in patients waitlisted for kidney transplant.

Methods: Among 303 consecutively listed transplant candidates, 172 had a computed scan within 3 months of frailty and biochemical testing that permitted muscle area evaluation. Third lumbar level psoas muscle indices (total bilateral psoas area/height²) were calculated. Testing included frailty metrics, treadmill and pedometer ability, troponin, and brain natriuretic peptide levels. Associations between muscle area, demographic, biochemical, and frailty measures were analyzed. Log-rank test was used to evaluate waitlist survival on the basis of muscle area, and multivariate Cox proportional hazards modeling was used to evaluate factors independently associated with survival.

Results: Demographic factors associated with third lumbar level psoas muscle indices include male sex (P < .001), race (P = .02), age (P = .004), and body mass index (P < .0001). Grip strength, treadmill ability, and Sit-Stands positively correlated with third lumbar level psoas muscle indices (P < .01). Brain natriuretic peptide and Up and Go negatively correlated with third lumbar level psoas muscle indices (P < .01). Survival was significantly associated with third lumbar level psoas muscle indices (P = 0.02). Treadmill ability, Sit-Stands, Up and Go, race and muscle area were most closely associated with waitlist survival on multivariate modeling.

Conclusion: Sarcopenia as assessed with muscle area measurements is independently associated with kidney waitlist survival. Functional ability and muscle area may be overlapping, but noncongruent, determinants of waitlist outcomes and may need to be individually assessed to create the most predictive survival model.

Objective: Use of impedance planimetry (EndoFLIP) has shown distensibility index ranges associated with improved patient-reported outcomes after antireflux surgery. Questions remain whether the previously described ideal distensibility index range can be used for patients with esophageal motility disorders. We hypothesized that patients with esophageal motility disorders would have a different ideal distensibility range for optimal outcomes.

Methods: A retrospective review of a prospectively maintained gastroesophageal database was performed for all patients undergoing Toupet and Nissen fundoplication and impedance planimetry. Demographic data, perioperative outcomes, and quality-of-life indicators (Reflux Symptom Index, Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease-Health Related Quality of Life Questionnaire, and gas/bloat and dysphagia scores) were analyzed and compared between patients by use of the χ² and Wilcoxon rank-sum tests.

Results: From 2015 to 2024, 475 patients underwent laparoscopic fundoplication and impedance planimetry evaluation. Of those, 160 had a final distensibility index score in the ideal range, 165 with a final distensibility index score <2.5, and 150 with a final distensibility index >3.6. In the ideal-range cohort, there were no statistically significant differences between those with normal and abnormal motility in regards to outcomes or quality of life indicators. In the low distensibility index cohort, patients with abnormal motility had worse Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease-Health Related Quality of Life Questionnaire, gas/bloat, and dysphagia scores at 1 year postoperatively compared with those with normal motility. More patients in the low distensibility index cohort required dilations postoperatively, and more patients in the high distensibility index cohort had recurrences compared with those in the ideal range cohort.

Conclusion: The previously described ideal distensibility index range of 2.5-3.6 for patients undergoing laparoscopic fundoplication may be used for patients with certain esophageal motility disorders.

Background: Postsepsis syndrome is associated with significant long-term mortality. The objective of this study was to determine predictors of mortality within 1 year of discharge from the surgical intensive care unit.

Methods: We retrospectively reviewed patients admitted to a surgical intensive care unit with sepsis (sequential organ failure assessment score ≥2, 2011-2022). Those who died within 1 year from discharge (n = 171) were compared to survivors (n = 639). Baseline characteristics, sepsis presentation, and hospitalization data were compared. A multiple logistic regression was performed to determine predictors of 1-year mortality after discharge.

Results: Compared with survivors, those who died were older, less likely to be transferred from another institution (35% vs 46%, P = .003), had more metastatic cancer (9% vs 1%, P < .01), or stage III + chronic kidney disease (16% vs 7%, P < .01). Admission sequential organ failure assessment score, lactate, and vasopressor use were comparable. The 1-year mortality cohort exhibited increased respiratory (15% vs 9%) and abdominal (66% vs 54%) infections (P < .01), median length of stay (29 vs 19, P < .005), renal failure (14% vs 9%, P = .048), and dependent discharge. Adjusted predictors of death included age (odds ratio [OR] 1.03, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.02-1.05), metastatic cancer (OR 8.0, 95% CI 2.6-25), chronic kidney disease (OR 2.8, 95% CI 1.4-5.6), length of stay (OR 1.02, 95% CI 1.0-1.03), and dependent discharge. A length of stay in the top quartile (>32 days) was associated with a 3-fold increase in postdischarge mortality compared with the lowest quartile (<10 days).

Conclusion: We identified independent predictors of postdischarge mortality following sepsis, including age, length of stay, dependent discharge, and stage III + chronic kidney disease. These data can identify at-risk patients who can be targeted for closer follow-up.

Background: Adequate postoperative pain control is essential after mastectomy. This study compares the influence of 2 regional analgesia techniques on length of stay and opioid use to systemic analgesia alone.

Methods: Patients treated with mastectomy from 2014 to 2020 were stratified according to perioperative analgesic modality (systemic analgesia versus thoracic epidural anesthesia or erector spinae plane block). Demographic, tumor, and treatment characteristics were compared. Outcome variables included postoperative anesthesia unit and hospital length of stay, postoperative day 1 and 2 discharge rates, and inpatient opioid use (in oral milligram morphine equivalents).

Results: Of 316 patients, 171 received systemic analgesia, 72 thoracic epidural anesthesia, and 73 erector spinae plane block. On univariate analysis, there were significant differences in age, neoadjuvant chemotherapy, bilateral surgery, immediate reconstruction, and Her2 positivity rates. Thoracic epidural anesthesia had the longest hospital length of stay, and erector spinae plane block the shortest, compared with systemic analgesia (52.1 vs 28 vs 30.6 hours, P < .0001). Postoperative day 1 discharge was more likely with erector spinae plane block than systemic analgesia and less likely with thoracic epidural anesthesia (89% vs 68.4% vs 30.6%, P < .0001). Erector spinae plane block required significantly less milligram morphine equivalents than thoracic epidural anesthesia or systemic analgesia on postoperative day 1 (10 vs 18.75 vs 20 milligram morphine equivalents, P < .0009), but no differences on postoperative day 2 (23.5 vs 20 vs 25 milligram morphine equivalents, P = .84). Total hospital opioid use was significantly lower for erector spinae plane block than thoracic epidural anesthesia or systemic analgesia (24 vs 32.3 vs 32 milligram morphine equivalents, P = .024). On multivariate analysis, thoracic epidural anesthesia was associated with significantly longer length of stay, whereas neither thoracic epidural anesthesia nor erector spinae plane block was associated with decreased opioid use.

Conclusion: Regional analgesia is not significantly associated with decreased opioid use or hospital length of stay.

Background: The Whipple procedure for pancreatic adenocarcinoma frequently is referred to surgeons at high-volume centers, which requires that patients travel long distances, potentially impacting patient outcomes. Furthermore, patients with pancreatic cancer from underserved areas often have poor outcomes. There are limited data on Whipple outcomes on the basis of both socioeconomic and distance traveled.

Methods: This retrospective cohort study examined patients who underwent the Whipple procedure for pancreatic adenocarcinoma at a tertiary care center from 2019 to 2021. Patients who lived in areas with an Area Deprivation Index national percentile of >50% and ≥100 miles away from the care center were labeled as "at-risk" patients.

Results: Seventy-eight patients were included, with 22 (28.2%) patients determined to be at risk. The preoperative characteristics were comparable between the patients in the at-risk and standard-risk groups. Postoperatively, patients in the at-risk group were more likely to require reoperation (13.6% vs 0%; P = .020) and less likely to undergo adjuvant chemotherapy (73.2% vs 50%; P = .034) than patients in the standard-risk group; pathologic staging and frequency of previous use of neoadjuvant chemotherapy were not significantly different between the groups. At-risk status did not influence overall survival or recurrence rate.

Conclusions: Through the integration of distance traveled and Area Deprivation Index, we have redefined the characterization of at-risk patients with pancreatic adenocarcinoma, who are at greater risk of undergoing reoperation and not receiving adjuvant chemotherapy. By addressing these intersecting challenges, providers can mitigate disparities and improve the care of these patients with pancreatic adenocarcinoma.

Background: Patients diagnosed with upper gastrointestinal cancers often require extensive end-of-life care. We sought to investigate social determinants of health associated with disparities in the location of death among patients who died of upper gastrointestinal cancers.

Methods: Patients who died between 2003 and 2020 from esophageal cancer, gastric cancer, hepatobiliary cancer, and pancreatic cancer were identified using the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Wide-Ranging Online Data for Epidemiologic Research database. Social determinants of health were assessed using the Social Vulnerability Index. Patients were categorized on the basis of location of death: inpatient hospital, home, nursing home, hospice, and outpatient medical facility/emergency department. Multivariable regression and mediation analyses defined the association of patient race as well as social determinants of health with location of death.

Results: Among 815,780 decedents (esophageal cancer: 15.3%; gastric cancer: 3.6%; hepatobiliary cancer: 36.6%; pancreatic cancer: 54.5%), most were male (60.8%), aged 55-74 years (52.3%), and White (89.1%). Most decedents died at home (55.7%), followed by inpatient hospital (24.8%), hospice (9.0%), nursing home (8.1%), and outpatient medical facility/emergency department (2.5%). During the study period, location of death shifted notably from inpatient hospital (36.8% to 21.3%) to home (45.8% to 56.3%). Residents of high Social Vulnerability Index areas were more likely to die at inpatient hospital compared with home (31.8% vs 24.3%) (P < .001). Black race (reference: White; odds ratio; 0.41, 95% confidence interval, 0.40-0.42) and social vulnerability (reference: low Social Vulnerability Index; odds ratio, 0.64, 95% confidence interval, 0.63-0.65) remained independently associated with lower odds of dying at home compared with an inpatient hospital. Notably, 65% of the overall race-based association with death at inpatient hospital was driven indirectly through social determinants of health.

Conclusion: Social determinants are important drivers of end-of-life care and impact the potential ability of patients with cancer to die at home.

Objective: Study findings showing an association between nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug use and marginal ulcer, a significant cause of morbidity after gastrojejunostomy, have been inconsistent. This study aimed to evaluate this relationship in large cohort.

Methods: This retrospective cohort included adult patients with a history of gastrojejunostomy documented between 2004 and 2023. The electronic medical record was queried for nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug prescriptions, marginal ulcer diagnosis, and comorbidities. Multivariable logistic regression was performed to assess the association between marginal ulcer and nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug exposures, controlling for smoking, Helicobacter pylori history, acid-suppressing therapy, diabetes, age, and sex.

Results: During the study period, 6,888 patients with a history of gastrojejunostomy were identified, of whom 45.2% (n = 3,115) of patients were exposed to an nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug and 10.12% (n = 697) developed a marginal ulcer. On multivariable analysis, the risk of marginal ulcer was found to be dose-dependent, with increasing odds of marginal ulcer with an increasing number of nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug exposures from odds ratio 1.67 (95% confidence interval, 1.37-2.02) with 1-2 nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug exposures to odds ratio 2.42 (95% confidence interval, 1.79-3.24) with >8 nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug exposures. Acid-suppressing therapy was found to be protective (odds ratio, 0.61; 95% confidence interval, 0.52-0.73). Over the last decade, the number of nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs prescribed to patients with gastrojejunostomy has significantly increased from 15.87 prescriptions per 1,000 patients per year to 531.02 per 1,000 patients per year (R² = 0.91, P < .001).

Conclusion: Marginal ulcer after gastrojejunostomy is associated with nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug prescriptions in a dose-dependent manner. Although acid-suppressing therapy appears protective for marginal ulcer, quality improvement efforts should focus on diminishing nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug prescribing in this population.

Objective: We sought to identify patients at risk of "futile" surgery for intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma using an artificial intelligence (AI)-based model based on preoperative variables.

Methods: Intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma patients who underwent resection between 1990 and 2020 were identified from a multi-institutional database. Futility was defined either as mortality or recurrence within 12 months of surgery. Various machine learning and deep learning techniques were used to develop prediction models for futile surgery.

Results: Overall, 827 intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma patients were included. Among 378 patients (45.7%) who had futile surgery, 297 patients (78.6%) developed intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma recurrence and 81 patients (21.4%) died within 12 months of surgical resection. An ensemble model consisting of multilayer perceptron and gradient boosting classifiers that used 10 preoperative factors demonstrated the highest accuracy, with areas under receiver operating characteristic curves of 0.830 (95% confidence interval 0.798-0.861) and 0.781 (95% confidence interval 0.707-0.853) in the training and testing cohorts, respectively. The model displayed sensitivity and specificity of 64.5% and 80.0%, respectively, with positive and negative predictive values of 73.1% and 72.7%, respectively. Radiologic tumor burden score, serum carbohydrate antigen 19-9, and direct bilirubin levels were the factors most strongly predictive of futile surgery. The artificial intelligence-based model was made available online for ease of use and clinical applicability (https://altaf-pawlik-icc-futilityofsurgery-calculator.streamlit.app/).

Conclusion: The artificial intelligence ensemble model demonstrated high accuracy to identify patients preoperatively at high risk of undergoing futile surgery for intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma. Artificial intelligence-based prediction models can provide clinicians with reliable preoperative guidance and aid in avoiding futile surgical procedures that are unlikely to provide patients long-term benefits.