Surgery最新文献

Introduction: Hepatic angioembolization is highly effective for hemorrhage control in hemodynamically stable patients with traumatic liver injuries and contrast extravasation. However, there is a paucity of data regarding the specific location of angioembolization within the hepatic arterial vasculature and its implications on patient outcomes.

Methods: A post-hoc analysis of a multicenter prospective observational study across 23 centers was performed. Adult patients undergoing main hepatic artery angioembolization or segmental hepatic artery angioembolization within 8 hours of arrival were included. The primary outcome was liver-related complications, defined as perihepatic fluid collection, bile leak/biloma, pseudoaneurysm, hepatic necrosis, and/or hepatic abscess. Secondary outcomes were liver-related complication interventions, length of stay, and mortality.

Results: A total of 55 patients underwent hepatic angioembolization, with 23 (41.8%) undergoing main hepatic artery angioembolization and 32 (58.2%) receiving segmental hepatic artery angioembolization. Both groups were comparable in age, vitals, mechanism of injury, liver injury grade distribution, and injury severity score (all P > .05). The main hepatic artery angioembolization group had greater rates of overall liver-related complications (65.2% vs 31.2%, P = .039), specifically perihepatic fluid collection (26.1% vs 6.3%, P = .040) and bile-leak/biloma (34.8% vs 12.5%, P = .048). Main hepatic artery angioembolization had greater rates of 2 or more liver-related complications (47.8% vs 9.4%, P = .001) and readmission within 30 days (30.4% vs 9.4%, P = .046). No significant differences were observed in hospital length of stay and mortality (all P > .05).

Conclusions: Main hepatic artery angioembolization is associated with increased rates of liver-related complications, multiple liver-related complications, and readmission within 30 days compared with segmental hepatic artery angioembolization. Thus, main hepatic artery angioembolization should be reserved for use only when segmental hepatic artery angioembolization is not feasible, albeit with significantly increased morbidity.

Aims: Whether rotation of a diverting loop ileostomy during rectal cancer surgery, for reducing the catastrophic effect of an anastomotic leakage, affects the incidence of small-bowel obstruction has not been fully investigated. The purpose of this study is to explore whether technical maneuvers in diverting loop ileostomy creation, including its rotation, are associated with increased incidence of small-bowel obstruction in rectal tumor surgery.

Methods: This multicenter prospective study was conducted by the Clinical Study Group of Osaka University, which comprises 24 major institutions. Patients with rectal adenocarcinoma scheduled for laparoscopic/robotic low anterior resection or intersphincteric resection with a diverting loop ileostomy were included. A total of 451 patients were prospectively enrolled between July 2015 and April 2021. The primary endpoint was the relevance of loop ileostomy rotation to the incidence of small-bowel obstruction; the secondary endpoints included the origin of the small-bowel obstruction and length of hospital stay.

Results: Small-bowel obstruction was observed in 10.8% in the nonrotated group and 12.3% in the rotated group, with no significant difference (P > .99). The only risk factor identified for small-bowel obstruction was distance from the ileocecal valve, with a significant difference in 16 patients (7.3%) with a distance of ≤30 cm and 16 patients (15.4%) in a distance of >30 cm (P = .028).

Conclusion: Rotation of the diverting loop ileostomy had no significant effect on the incidence of small-bowel obstruction.

Introduction: Early identification of traumatic brain injury followed by timely, targeted treatment is essential. We aimed to establish the ability of prehospital Glasgow Coma Scale score alone and combined with vital signs to predict hospital-diagnosed traumatic brain injury.

Methods: This study included adults from the 2017-2020 Trauma Quality Improvement Program data set with blunt mechanism. We calculated test characteristics of prehospital Glasgow Coma Scale score ≤12 alone and Glasgow Coma Scale score combined with heart rate and systolic blood pressure for predicting (1) any traumatic brain injury and (2) moderate to severe traumatic brain injury. Diagnostic performances were calculated in all patients and older adults (≥55 years). We used decision curve analysis to determine the net diagnostic benefit of prehospital Glasgow Coma Scale score combined with heart rate + systolic blood pressure over Glasgow Coma Scale score alone.

Results: Of 1,687,336 patients, 39.1% had any traumatic brain injury, 3.7% had moderate to severe traumatic brain injury, and 9.1% had a prehospital Glasgow Coma Scale score ≤12. Prehospital Glasgow Coma Scale score ≤12 alone had a sensitivity 83.1%, specificity 93.7%, negative predictive value 99.3%, and positive predictive value 33.7% for predicting moderate to severe traumatic brain injury. Adding prehospital heart rate <65/min and systolic blood pressure >150 mm Hg to Glasgow Coma Scale score ≤12 improved the positive predictive value for moderate to severe traumatic brain injury (55.3%), with a preserved negative predictive value of 96.4%. Decision curve analysis showed the traumatic brain injury prediction model including prehospital heart rate and systolic blood pressure had the greatest net benefit across most threshold probabilities.

Conclusion: Less than a third of adult blunt trauma patients with a prehospital Glasgow Coma Scale score ≤12 have moderate to severe traumatic brain injury. Supplementing Glasgow Coma Scale score with prehospital vital signs improves diagnostic accuracy, potentially by filtering out patients with altered consciousness due to shock. Future work should better identify patients for traumatic brain injury-specific treatments in prehospital settings, including triage destination.

Introduction: The American Association of Endocrine Surgeons drafted Entrustable Professional Activities for Comprehensive Endocrine Surgery to assess trainees in core topics.

Methods: Fourteen Entrustable Professional Activities were defined. There were 10 "core" Entrustable Professional Activities, with 6 having 3 phases (pre-, intra-, and postoperative) and 4 having a single phase. There were also 4 elective Entrustable Professional Activities, all of which had 3 phases. Beginning in July 2022, 10 institutions collected 3-item microassessments of trainee performance in Entrustable Professional Activities using a web-based platform. Entrustment was measured on a 5-point scale.

Results: A total of 698 microassessments were submitted between July 2022 and September 2023, with a wide range between programs (3-449, median: 24). Four-hundred ninety-two microassessments were completed for endocrine surgery fellows, 6 for chief residents, 6 for postgraduate year 4 students, 166 for postgraduate year 3 students, and 28 for postgraduate year 2 students. Entrustment scores for fellows improved in the second half of the academic year, with 38.2% of microassessments with highest (4/5) entrustment scores in the first 6 months of the academic year and 80.1% with highest scores in the second half of the year (P < .001). Intraoperative entrustment scores were lowest in the adrenal category, with only 13 of 117 (11.1%) of microassessments with highest entrustment compared with 85 with 230 (37.0%) in the thyroid category, and 65 of 165 (39.4%) in the parathyroid category (P < .001). Trainees were more likely to achieve highest entrustment in the first 6 months for preoperative (36/70, 28.5%) and postoperative (15/28, 53.5%) phases of care, compared with the intraoperative phase of care (79/334, 23.6%) (P < .001).

Conclusion: Entrustment scores improved in the second half of the academic year, and trainees were likely to achieve entrustment earlier in nonoperative phases of care.

Background: Few studies compared laparoscopic and open pancreatoduodenectomy for pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma after neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy.

Methods: Retrospective cohort of patients who underwent laparoscopic or open pancreatoduodenectomy for resectable or borderline resectable pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma after chemoradiotherapy between 2012 and 2023 was analyzed. Open pancreatoduodenectomy patients could theoretically benefit from the laparoscopic approach. We used a 1:2 (laparoscopic-to-open pancreatoduodenectomy) propensity score matching analysis stratified on age, gender, and body mass index.

Results: We included 128 patients (33 laparoscopic and 95 open pancreatoduodenectomy), and after propensity score matching, 33 laparoscopic pancreatoduodenectomy and 66 open pancreatoduodenectomy were compared. There was no difference in demographic data except for lower tobacco use in laparoscopic pancreatoduodenectomy group (9% vs 30%, P = .023) with similar clinical presentation. Laparoscopic pancreatoduodenectomy compared to open pancreatoduodenectomy showed a longer median operative duration (380 vs 255 minutes, P < .001), shorter median length of resected vein (15 vs 23 mm, P = .01), longer median venous clamping time (29 vs 15 minutes, P = .005), similar median blood loss (300 vs 300 mL, P = .223), similar rate of hard pancreas (97% vs 85%, P = .094), and a larger median size of Wirsung duct (5 vs 4 mm, P = .02). Postoperative outcomes showed similar 90-day mortality rates (3% vs 3%, P > .99), Clavien-Dindo III-IV complications (6% vs 14%, P = .158), median lengths of hospital stay (12 vs 13 days, P = .409), and readmission rates (9% vs 18%, P = .366). Pathologic data showed similar R0 resection rates (88% vs 82%, P = .568). With a similar rate of adjuvant chemotherapy (P = .324) and shorter median follow-up with laparoscopic pancreatoduodenectomy (18 vs 34 months, P = .004), 3-year overall (P = .768) and disease-free (P = .839) survival rates were similar.

Conclusion: In selected patients, laparoscopic pancreatoduodenectomy for pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma after neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy appears to be safe and feasible when performed in experienced centers.