Pub Date : 2025-02-01Epub Date: 2024-11-23DOI: 10.1016/j.surg.2024.09.049
Courtney Collins, Marie L Crandall
The Supreme Court's ruling against the use of race as a consideration for higher education admissions programs has had a profound impact on diversity, equity, and inclusion efforts at many of our academic institutions. Many of us who understand the value of diversity in business and health care and who value equity are now confronted with a changing political landscape. Given these challenges and changes with respect to diversity, equity, and inclusion policies, it will be important for the surgical community to better codify the aspects of diversity that are beneficial and not specific to race, such as ability to overcome adversity, or the richness of the lived experience. It will become increasingly important to engage legislative bodies and implement institutional strategies to ensure the best outcomes for our patients and support an increasingly diverse surgical workforce.
{"title":"The path ahead: Navigating the changing diversity, equity, and inclusion landscape.","authors":"Courtney Collins, Marie L Crandall","doi":"10.1016/j.surg.2024.09.049","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.surg.2024.09.049","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The Supreme Court's ruling against the use of race as a consideration for higher education admissions programs has had a profound impact on diversity, equity, and inclusion efforts at many of our academic institutions. Many of us who understand the value of diversity in business and health care and who value equity are now confronted with a changing political landscape. Given these challenges and changes with respect to diversity, equity, and inclusion policies, it will be important for the surgical community to better codify the aspects of diversity that are beneficial and not specific to race, such as ability to overcome adversity, or the richness of the lived experience. It will become increasingly important to engage legislative bodies and implement institutional strategies to ensure the best outcomes for our patients and support an increasingly diverse surgical workforce.</p>","PeriodicalId":22152,"journal":{"name":"Surgery","volume":" ","pages":"108913"},"PeriodicalIF":3.2,"publicationDate":"2025-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142710971","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-02-01Epub Date: 2024-10-07DOI: 10.1016/j.surg.2024.08.044
Wei-Zhen Tang, Wen-Xin Deng, Tai-Hang Liu
{"title":"Dexmedetomidine's role in inflammation and pain post video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery for lung cancer.","authors":"Wei-Zhen Tang, Wen-Xin Deng, Tai-Hang Liu","doi":"10.1016/j.surg.2024.08.044","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.surg.2024.08.044","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":22152,"journal":{"name":"Surgery","volume":" ","pages":"108821"},"PeriodicalIF":3.2,"publicationDate":"2025-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142393524","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Background: Patients diagnosed with pathologic T1N0 esophageal squamous cell carcinoma and treated with surgery alone have a good prognosis and are generally followed up without adjuvant therapy. However, recurrence has been observed in this patient group. Therefore, this study aimed to identify recurrence and prognostic factors in patients with pathologic T1N0 esophageal squamous cell carcinoma who were treated with surgery alone.
Methods: Of the 532 patients who underwent esophagectomy with R0 resection at Hiroshima University Hospital between August 2003 and November 2018, 124 who underwent only esophagectomy and had pathological T1N0 esophageal squamous cell carcinoma were included in the study. Recurrence and prognostic factors were analyzed and details of recurrence were evaluated.
Results: The 5-year recurrence-free survival and 5-year overall survival rates were 84.7% and 87.2%, respectively. Recurrence was observed in 12 (9.7%) patients. Univariate and multivariate analyses showed that the histologic type (poorly differentiated compared with others) and lymphatic and/or vascular invasion (positive compared with negative) were statistically significant for recurrence-free survival. Kaplan-Meier curves for recurrence-free survival and overall survival showed that prognosis was significantly stratified according to these factors. All patients with poorly differentiated and positive lymphatic and/or vascular invasion experienced recurrence and recurrence pattern is all distant metastases.
Conclusions: Poorly differentiated and lymphatic and/or vascular invasion are important recurrence and prognostic predictors in pathologic T1N0 esophageal squamous cell carcinoma treated with surgery alone. Patients with these prognostic factors experienced increased recurrence rates, often with distant metastasis. Therefore, adjuvant therapy may be beneficial for such patients and follow-ups should be performed at closer intervals.
{"title":"Recurrence and prognostic predictors in pathologic T1N0 esophageal squamous cell carcinoma treated with surgery alone.","authors":"Manato Ohsawa, Yoichi Hamai, Manabu Emi, Yuta Ibuki, Tomoaki Kurokawa, Ryosuke Hirohata, Nao Kitasaki, Morihito Okada","doi":"10.1016/j.surg.2024.09.019","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.surg.2024.09.019","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Patients diagnosed with pathologic T1N0 esophageal squamous cell carcinoma and treated with surgery alone have a good prognosis and are generally followed up without adjuvant therapy. However, recurrence has been observed in this patient group. Therefore, this study aimed to identify recurrence and prognostic factors in patients with pathologic T1N0 esophageal squamous cell carcinoma who were treated with surgery alone.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Of the 532 patients who underwent esophagectomy with R0 resection at Hiroshima University Hospital between August 2003 and November 2018, 124 who underwent only esophagectomy and had pathological T1N0 esophageal squamous cell carcinoma were included in the study. Recurrence and prognostic factors were analyzed and details of recurrence were evaluated.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The 5-year recurrence-free survival and 5-year overall survival rates were 84.7% and 87.2%, respectively. Recurrence was observed in 12 (9.7%) patients. Univariate and multivariate analyses showed that the histologic type (poorly differentiated compared with others) and lymphatic and/or vascular invasion (positive compared with negative) were statistically significant for recurrence-free survival. Kaplan-Meier curves for recurrence-free survival and overall survival showed that prognosis was significantly stratified according to these factors. All patients with poorly differentiated and positive lymphatic and/or vascular invasion experienced recurrence and recurrence pattern is all distant metastases.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Poorly differentiated and lymphatic and/or vascular invasion are important recurrence and prognostic predictors in pathologic T1N0 esophageal squamous cell carcinoma treated with surgery alone. Patients with these prognostic factors experienced increased recurrence rates, often with distant metastasis. Therefore, adjuvant therapy may be beneficial for such patients and follow-ups should be performed at closer intervals.</p>","PeriodicalId":22152,"journal":{"name":"Surgery","volume":" ","pages":"108863"},"PeriodicalIF":3.2,"publicationDate":"2025-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142475293","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-02-01Epub Date: 2024-11-26DOI: 10.1016/j.surg.2024.10.023
Thomas J O'Keefe, Charissa Lake, Louis A Perkins, Sean A Perez, Isabella Guajardo, Simone Carlson Hyman, Laura M Adams, Bard C Cosman, William D Ardill, Bruce M Potenza
Background: Insecure surgical knots can cause surgical complications ranging from wound dehiscence to massive exsanguination and death. Most surgeons tie half-hitch knots, of which some configurations are prone to slippage. We aim to characterize the securities of different half-hitch knot configurations.
Methods: A literature search was conducted using PubMed and Embase for studies in which comparisons of knot security were made between different half-hitch knot configurations. Two reviewers screened and selected articles.
Results: From 2,204 abstracts identified, 14 were selected for inclusion. In all 8 of the studies in which there was a direct comparison between knots tied with opposite throws on the same post, which are tied when greater tension is applied to the same strand end, and knots tied with any throws on alternating posts which are tied when the strand on which greater tension is applied switches between the strand ends, there was at least one comparison of configurations in which any throws on alternating posts knots were more secure than opposite throws on the same post knots. There was also less variability in the securities of any throws on alternating posts knots than opposite throws on the same post knots. Knots tied with identical throws on the same post were less secure than opposite throws on the same post and any throws on alternating posts.
Conclusions: The securities of half-hitch knots exist on a spectrum. any throws on alternating posts knots were consistently the most secure independent of whether throws were opposite or identical, and identical throws on the same post knots were less secure than opposite throws on the same post and any throws on alternating posts. Surgeons should consider any throws on alternating posts knots as opposed to the more commonly utilized opposite throws on the same post knots.
{"title":"\"The Gordian knot of it he will unloose\": Lessons learned from studies of half-hitch surgical knots and implications for practicing surgeons: A systematic review.","authors":"Thomas J O'Keefe, Charissa Lake, Louis A Perkins, Sean A Perez, Isabella Guajardo, Simone Carlson Hyman, Laura M Adams, Bard C Cosman, William D Ardill, Bruce M Potenza","doi":"10.1016/j.surg.2024.10.023","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.surg.2024.10.023","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Insecure surgical knots can cause surgical complications ranging from wound dehiscence to massive exsanguination and death. Most surgeons tie half-hitch knots, of which some configurations are prone to slippage. We aim to characterize the securities of different half-hitch knot configurations.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A literature search was conducted using PubMed and Embase for studies in which comparisons of knot security were made between different half-hitch knot configurations. Two reviewers screened and selected articles.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>From 2,204 abstracts identified, 14 were selected for inclusion. In all 8 of the studies in which there was a direct comparison between knots tied with opposite throws on the same post, which are tied when greater tension is applied to the same strand end, and knots tied with any throws on alternating posts which are tied when the strand on which greater tension is applied switches between the strand ends, there was at least one comparison of configurations in which any throws on alternating posts knots were more secure than opposite throws on the same post knots. There was also less variability in the securities of any throws on alternating posts knots than opposite throws on the same post knots. Knots tied with identical throws on the same post were less secure than opposite throws on the same post and any throws on alternating posts.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The securities of half-hitch knots exist on a spectrum. any throws on alternating posts knots were consistently the most secure independent of whether throws were opposite or identical, and identical throws on the same post knots were less secure than opposite throws on the same post and any throws on alternating posts. Surgeons should consider any throws on alternating posts knots as opposed to the more commonly utilized opposite throws on the same post knots.</p>","PeriodicalId":22152,"journal":{"name":"Surgery","volume":" ","pages":"108932"},"PeriodicalIF":3.2,"publicationDate":"2025-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142732912","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-02-01Epub Date: 2024-11-01DOI: 10.1016/j.surg.2024.09.041
Elias Karam, Charlotte Rondé-Roupie, Béatrice Aussilhou, Olivia Hentic, Vinciane Rebours, Mickaël Lesurtel, Alain Sauvanet, Safi Dokmak
Background: Few studies compared laparoscopic and open pancreatoduodenectomy for pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma after neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy.
Methods: Retrospective cohort of patients who underwent laparoscopic or open pancreatoduodenectomy for resectable or borderline resectable pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma after chemoradiotherapy between 2012 and 2023 was analyzed. Open pancreatoduodenectomy patients could theoretically benefit from the laparoscopic approach. We used a 1:2 (laparoscopic-to-open pancreatoduodenectomy) propensity score matching analysis stratified on age, gender, and body mass index.
Results: We included 128 patients (33 laparoscopic and 95 open pancreatoduodenectomy), and after propensity score matching, 33 laparoscopic pancreatoduodenectomy and 66 open pancreatoduodenectomy were compared. There was no difference in demographic data except for lower tobacco use in laparoscopic pancreatoduodenectomy group (9% vs 30%, P = .023) with similar clinical presentation. Laparoscopic pancreatoduodenectomy compared to open pancreatoduodenectomy showed a longer median operative duration (380 vs 255 minutes, P < .001), shorter median length of resected vein (15 vs 23 mm, P = .01), longer median venous clamping time (29 vs 15 minutes, P = .005), similar median blood loss (300 vs 300 mL, P = .223), similar rate of hard pancreas (97% vs 85%, P = .094), and a larger median size of Wirsung duct (5 vs 4 mm, P = .02). Postoperative outcomes showed similar 90-day mortality rates (3% vs 3%, P > .99), Clavien-Dindo III-IV complications (6% vs 14%, P = .158), median lengths of hospital stay (12 vs 13 days, P = .409), and readmission rates (9% vs 18%, P = .366). Pathologic data showed similar R0 resection rates (88% vs 82%, P = .568). With a similar rate of adjuvant chemotherapy (P = .324) and shorter median follow-up with laparoscopic pancreatoduodenectomy (18 vs 34 months, P = .004), 3-year overall (P = .768) and disease-free (P = .839) survival rates were similar.
Conclusion: In selected patients, laparoscopic pancreatoduodenectomy for pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma after neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy appears to be safe and feasible when performed in experienced centers.
背景:很少有研究比较新辅助化疗后的胰腺导管腺癌腹腔镜和开腹胰十二指肠切除术:很少有研究对新辅助化放疗后胰腺导管腺癌的腹腔镜和开腹胰十二指肠切除术进行比较:分析了2012年至2023年间因化疗后可切除或边缘可切除胰腺导管腺癌而接受腹腔镜或开腹胰十二指肠切除术的患者回顾性队列。开腹胰十二指肠切除术患者理论上可以从腹腔镜方法中获益。我们采用了1:2(腹腔镜胰十二指肠切除术对开腹胰十二指肠切除术)倾向得分匹配分析,并根据年龄、性别和体重指数进行了分层:我们纳入了128名患者(33名腹腔镜胰十二指肠切除术患者和95名开腹胰十二指肠切除术患者),经过倾向得分匹配后,比较了33名腹腔镜胰十二指肠切除术患者和66名开腹胰十二指肠切除术患者。除腹腔镜胰十二指肠切除术组吸烟率较低外(9% vs 30%,P = .023),其他人口统计学数据无差异,临床表现相似。腹腔镜胰十二指肠切除术与开腹胰十二指肠切除术相比,中位手术时间更长(380 分钟对 255 分钟,P < .001),切除静脉的中位长度更短(15 毫米对 23 毫米,P = .01),中位静脉夹闭时间更长(29 分钟对 15 分钟,P = .005),中位失血量相似(300 毫升对 300 毫升,P = .223),硬胰腺率相似(97% 对 85%,P = .094),Wirsung 管中位尺寸更大(5 毫米对 4 毫米,P = .02)。术后结果显示,90 天死亡率(3% vs 3%,P > .99)、Clavien-Dindo III-IV 并发症(6% vs 14%,P = .158)、中位住院时间(12 vs 13 天,P = .409)和再入院率(9% vs 18%,P = .366)相似。病理数据显示,R0切除率相似(88% vs 82%,P = .568)。腹腔镜胰十二指肠切除术的辅助化疗率相似(P = .324),中位随访时间较短(18 个月 vs 34 个月,P = .004),3 年总生存率(P = .768)和无病生存率(P = .839)相似:结论:在有经验的中心,对经过新辅助化放疗的胰腺导管腺癌患者进行腹腔镜胰十二指肠切除术似乎是安全可行的。
{"title":"Laparoscopic pancreatoduodenectomy is safe for the treatment of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma treated by chemoradiotherapy compared with open pancreatoduodenectomy: A matched case-control study.","authors":"Elias Karam, Charlotte Rondé-Roupie, Béatrice Aussilhou, Olivia Hentic, Vinciane Rebours, Mickaël Lesurtel, Alain Sauvanet, Safi Dokmak","doi":"10.1016/j.surg.2024.09.041","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.surg.2024.09.041","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Few studies compared laparoscopic and open pancreatoduodenectomy for pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma after neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Retrospective cohort of patients who underwent laparoscopic or open pancreatoduodenectomy for resectable or borderline resectable pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma after chemoradiotherapy between 2012 and 2023 was analyzed. Open pancreatoduodenectomy patients could theoretically benefit from the laparoscopic approach. We used a 1:2 (laparoscopic-to-open pancreatoduodenectomy) propensity score matching analysis stratified on age, gender, and body mass index.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We included 128 patients (33 laparoscopic and 95 open pancreatoduodenectomy), and after propensity score matching, 33 laparoscopic pancreatoduodenectomy and 66 open pancreatoduodenectomy were compared. There was no difference in demographic data except for lower tobacco use in laparoscopic pancreatoduodenectomy group (9% vs 30%, P = .023) with similar clinical presentation. Laparoscopic pancreatoduodenectomy compared to open pancreatoduodenectomy showed a longer median operative duration (380 vs 255 minutes, P < .001), shorter median length of resected vein (15 vs 23 mm, P = .01), longer median venous clamping time (29 vs 15 minutes, P = .005), similar median blood loss (300 vs 300 mL, P = .223), similar rate of hard pancreas (97% vs 85%, P = .094), and a larger median size of Wirsung duct (5 vs 4 mm, P = .02). Postoperative outcomes showed similar 90-day mortality rates (3% vs 3%, P > .99), Clavien-Dindo III-IV complications (6% vs 14%, P = .158), median lengths of hospital stay (12 vs 13 days, P = .409), and readmission rates (9% vs 18%, P = .366). Pathologic data showed similar R0 resection rates (88% vs 82%, P = .568). With a similar rate of adjuvant chemotherapy (P = .324) and shorter median follow-up with laparoscopic pancreatoduodenectomy (18 vs 34 months, P = .004), 3-year overall (P = .768) and disease-free (P = .839) survival rates were similar.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>In selected patients, laparoscopic pancreatoduodenectomy for pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma after neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy appears to be safe and feasible when performed in experienced centers.</p>","PeriodicalId":22152,"journal":{"name":"Surgery","volume":" ","pages":"108892"},"PeriodicalIF":3.2,"publicationDate":"2025-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142565206","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-02-01Epub Date: 2024-12-06DOI: 10.1016/j.surg.2024.10.012
Joseph Tanenbaum, Susheel Reddy, John Slocum, Colin Cantrell, Bennet Butler, Alexander Lundberg, Anne M Stey
Background: Observational studies reported that nontrauma/low-level trauma centers less frequently transferred insured injured patients to high-level centers. The dependent coverage provision of the Affordable Care Act was a natural experiment expanding insurance eligibility in 2010 by allowing young adults to remain on their parents' insurance until age 26 years old. The objective was to determine whether expanded insurance eligibility reduced interhospital transfers.
Methods: This observational, retrospective cohort study of the 2007-2013 National Trauma Data Bank used a difference-in-differences design to compare the change in interhospital transfer rates before and after dependent coverage provision implementation between dependent coverage provision-eligible (aged 19-25 years) and dependent coverage provision-ineligible (aged 27-34 years) injured patients. The exposure of interest was the dependent coverage provision. The main outcome was yearly rate of interhospital transfer. Least-squares linear regression modeled interhospital transfer rates and quantified association with the age-based dependent coverage provision eligibility binary interaction term in the pre-dependent coverage provision versus post-dependent coverage provision time periods.
Results: A total of 535,036 dependent coverage provision-eligible and 431,462 dependent coverage provision-ineligible patients were identified. The median Injury Severity Score was 6.0 (interquartile range = 4.0-13.0) for both cohorts. Private insurance rates increased from 28.1% to 38.7% among the dependent coverage provision-eligible cohort and from 27.0% to 30.5% among the older cohort between the pre-dependent coverage provision to post-dependent coverage provision time period. The average yearly interhospital transfer rate was not significantly different between the cohorts in the pre-dependent coverage provision (2.3% lower among dependent coverage provision-eligible) and the post-dependent coverage provision time periods (2.9% lower among dependent coverage provision-eligible). Difference-in-differences analysis revealed nonsignificant 14.6 fewer transfers/10,000 patients (95% confidence interval = 33.7 fewer to 4.4 more transfers/10,000 patients).
Conclusion: Policies expanding insurance eligibility do not reduce interhospital transfers in a mature trauma system.
背景:观察性研究报道,非创伤/低水平创伤中心很少将有保险的受伤患者转移到高水平中心。《平价医疗法案》(Affordable Care Act)中的家属保险条款是2010年扩大保险资格的自然实验,允许年轻人在26岁之前继续享受父母的保险。目的是确定扩大保险资格是否减少了医院间转诊。方法:这项观察性、回顾性队列研究来自2007-2013年国家创伤数据库,采用差异中差异设计,比较符合家属保险规定(19-25岁)和不符合家属保险规定(27-34岁)的受伤患者在实施家属保险规定前后医院间转院率的变化。利息的暴露是从属保险条款。主要观察指标为院间转院率。最小二乘线性回归模拟了医院间转诊率,并量化了基于年龄的依赖保险提供资格在依赖前保险提供与依赖后保险提供时间段内的二元相互作用项的关联。结果:共确定了535,036名符合保险规定的依赖患者和431,462名不符合保险规定的依赖患者。两个队列的损伤严重程度评分中位数为6.0(四分位数范围= 4.0-13.0)。在赡养前和赡养后的保险提供期间,私人保险费率在符合条件的赡养人群中从28.1%增加到38.7%,在老年人群中从27.0%增加到30.5%。平均每年医院间转接率在依赖前保险提供(符合条件的依赖者低2.3%)和依赖后保险提供时间段(符合条件的依赖者低2.9%)的队列之间没有显著差异。差异中差异分析显示,每10,000名患者减少14.6次转运(95%置信区间= 33.7次减少至4.4次转运/10,000名患者)。结论:扩大保险资格的政策不会减少成熟创伤系统的医院间转院。
{"title":"Quantifying health insurance eligibility impact on interhospital transfers of injured patients: Evidence from the affordable care act's dependent coverage provision.","authors":"Joseph Tanenbaum, Susheel Reddy, John Slocum, Colin Cantrell, Bennet Butler, Alexander Lundberg, Anne M Stey","doi":"10.1016/j.surg.2024.10.012","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.surg.2024.10.012","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Observational studies reported that nontrauma/low-level trauma centers less frequently transferred insured injured patients to high-level centers. The dependent coverage provision of the Affordable Care Act was a natural experiment expanding insurance eligibility in 2010 by allowing young adults to remain on their parents' insurance until age 26 years old. The objective was to determine whether expanded insurance eligibility reduced interhospital transfers.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This observational, retrospective cohort study of the 2007-2013 National Trauma Data Bank used a difference-in-differences design to compare the change in interhospital transfer rates before and after dependent coverage provision implementation between dependent coverage provision-eligible (aged 19-25 years) and dependent coverage provision-ineligible (aged 27-34 years) injured patients. The exposure of interest was the dependent coverage provision. The main outcome was yearly rate of interhospital transfer. Least-squares linear regression modeled interhospital transfer rates and quantified association with the age-based dependent coverage provision eligibility binary interaction term in the pre-dependent coverage provision versus post-dependent coverage provision time periods.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 535,036 dependent coverage provision-eligible and 431,462 dependent coverage provision-ineligible patients were identified. The median Injury Severity Score was 6.0 (interquartile range = 4.0-13.0) for both cohorts. Private insurance rates increased from 28.1% to 38.7% among the dependent coverage provision-eligible cohort and from 27.0% to 30.5% among the older cohort between the pre-dependent coverage provision to post-dependent coverage provision time period. The average yearly interhospital transfer rate was not significantly different between the cohorts in the pre-dependent coverage provision (2.3% lower among dependent coverage provision-eligible) and the post-dependent coverage provision time periods (2.9% lower among dependent coverage provision-eligible). Difference-in-differences analysis revealed nonsignificant 14.6 fewer transfers/10,000 patients (95% confidence interval = 33.7 fewer to 4.4 more transfers/10,000 patients).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Policies expanding insurance eligibility do not reduce interhospital transfers in a mature trauma system.</p>","PeriodicalId":22152,"journal":{"name":"Surgery","volume":"178 ","pages":"108921"},"PeriodicalIF":3.2,"publicationDate":"2025-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11717614/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142792329","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-02-01Epub Date: 2024-11-30DOI: 10.1016/j.surg.2024.10.031
Kaitlin G Burge, Hannah Ficarino Sheffer, Mary Smithson, Chandler McLeod, Daniel Chu, Robert H Hollis
Background: Expedited discharge after surgery with construction of an ostomy may leave patients less prepared for home self-care, leading to increased hospital readmissions. We evaluated whether readmission rates were greater for patients with an expedited discharge (1-2 days) compared with nonexpedited discharge (3-5 days) after ostomy construction.
Methods: A retrospective analysis of a prospective database of patients undergoing ostomy construction was performed using the American College of Surgeons National Safety and Quality Improvement Project data between years 2019 and 2020. Inclusion criteria included age >18 years, discharge to home, and postoperative length of stay 1-5 days. Patients were grouped into either expedited or nonexpedited discharge by postoperative length of stay. The primary outcome was 30-day postoperative readmission. Analysis included multivariable logistic regression models and partial effects analysis.
Results: Of 13,628 patients included, 14.5% (n = 1,980) had an expedited discharge. Rates of 30-day readmission were 13.6% in the expedited group and 14.2% in the nonexpedited group (P = .51). Adjusting for patient and procedure factors, there was no significant difference in readmission rates between expedited and nonexpedited discharge groups (odds ratio, 1.08; 95% confidence interval, 0.94-1.25). In stratified analysis, there was no difference in readmission by discharge timing for any procedure type. The top 3 contributors to having an expedited discharge, as assessed by partial effects analysis, were procedure type, elective surgery, and pre-operative sepsis.
Conclusions: Early discharge within 1-2 days of ostomy construction was not associated with increased 30-day hospital readmissions. These findings support expedited discharges after ostomy construction in carefully selected, eligible patients.
{"title":"Expedited discharge and risk of readmission after ostomy construction.","authors":"Kaitlin G Burge, Hannah Ficarino Sheffer, Mary Smithson, Chandler McLeod, Daniel Chu, Robert H Hollis","doi":"10.1016/j.surg.2024.10.031","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.surg.2024.10.031","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Expedited discharge after surgery with construction of an ostomy may leave patients less prepared for home self-care, leading to increased hospital readmissions. We evaluated whether readmission rates were greater for patients with an expedited discharge (1-2 days) compared with nonexpedited discharge (3-5 days) after ostomy construction.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A retrospective analysis of a prospective database of patients undergoing ostomy construction was performed using the American College of Surgeons National Safety and Quality Improvement Project data between years 2019 and 2020. Inclusion criteria included age >18 years, discharge to home, and postoperative length of stay 1-5 days. Patients were grouped into either expedited or nonexpedited discharge by postoperative length of stay. The primary outcome was 30-day postoperative readmission. Analysis included multivariable logistic regression models and partial effects analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of 13,628 patients included, 14.5% (n = 1,980) had an expedited discharge. Rates of 30-day readmission were 13.6% in the expedited group and 14.2% in the nonexpedited group (P = .51). Adjusting for patient and procedure factors, there was no significant difference in readmission rates between expedited and nonexpedited discharge groups (odds ratio, 1.08; 95% confidence interval, 0.94-1.25). In stratified analysis, there was no difference in readmission by discharge timing for any procedure type. The top 3 contributors to having an expedited discharge, as assessed by partial effects analysis, were procedure type, elective surgery, and pre-operative sepsis.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Early discharge within 1-2 days of ostomy construction was not associated with increased 30-day hospital readmissions. These findings support expedited discharges after ostomy construction in carefully selected, eligible patients.</p>","PeriodicalId":22152,"journal":{"name":"Surgery","volume":" ","pages":"108948"},"PeriodicalIF":3.2,"publicationDate":"2025-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11717625/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142772494","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-02-01Epub Date: 2024-11-30DOI: 10.1016/j.surg.2024.11.002
Alexander A J Grüter, Boudewijn R Toorenvliet, Pieter J Tanis, Jurriaan B Tuynman
Background: Recently, a competency assessment tool has been developed within the RIGHT project, a national quality improvement program for minimally invasive right hemicolectomy in patients with colon cancer. This study aimed to evaluate whether trained medical students can reliably evaluate minimally invasive right hemicolectomy videos using a competency assessment tool.
Methods: Nine expert colorectal surgeons, 13 trained medical students, and 17 untrained medical students assessed the surgical quality of 6 full-length minimally invasive right hemicolectomy videos with the competency assessment tool. The expert surgeons were trained using the competency assessment tool by the RIGHT project leaders, who were also involved in the development and validation of the competency assessment tool. Training for medical students included anatomy, step-by-step procedure explanation, and competency assessment tool review with 2 supervised video assessments. The untrained students were taught only anatomy and minimally invasive right hemicolectomy steps. The intraclass correlation coefficient was calculated to determine inter-rater reliability, and analysis of variance with the Bonferroni correction for multiple testing was used to assess potential differences between the groups per video.
Results: The trained students demonstrated an overall excellent inter-rater reliability (intraclass correlation coefficient score of 0.885). When their scores were combined with those of the expert surgeons, a high inter-rater reliability was also demonstrated (intraclass correlation coefficient score of 0.945). Trained students consistently aligned with surgeons' mean total scores, also accurately identifying lower quality surgeries. Untrained students assigned statistically significantly higher scores to the 3 lower quality surgeries as compared with expert surgeons and trained students.
Conclusion: Among trained students, excellent inter-rater reliability and concordance with expert colorectal surgeons was found. The study highlights the potential to engage trained medical students for objective minimally invasive right hemicolectomy video assessment.
{"title":"Video-based surgical quality assessment of minimally invasive right hemicolectomy by medical students after specific training.","authors":"Alexander A J Grüter, Boudewijn R Toorenvliet, Pieter J Tanis, Jurriaan B Tuynman","doi":"10.1016/j.surg.2024.11.002","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.surg.2024.11.002","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Recently, a competency assessment tool has been developed within the RIGHT project, a national quality improvement program for minimally invasive right hemicolectomy in patients with colon cancer. This study aimed to evaluate whether trained medical students can reliably evaluate minimally invasive right hemicolectomy videos using a competency assessment tool.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Nine expert colorectal surgeons, 13 trained medical students, and 17 untrained medical students assessed the surgical quality of 6 full-length minimally invasive right hemicolectomy videos with the competency assessment tool. The expert surgeons were trained using the competency assessment tool by the RIGHT project leaders, who were also involved in the development and validation of the competency assessment tool. Training for medical students included anatomy, step-by-step procedure explanation, and competency assessment tool review with 2 supervised video assessments. The untrained students were taught only anatomy and minimally invasive right hemicolectomy steps. The intraclass correlation coefficient was calculated to determine inter-rater reliability, and analysis of variance with the Bonferroni correction for multiple testing was used to assess potential differences between the groups per video.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The trained students demonstrated an overall excellent inter-rater reliability (intraclass correlation coefficient score of 0.885). When their scores were combined with those of the expert surgeons, a high inter-rater reliability was also demonstrated (intraclass correlation coefficient score of 0.945). Trained students consistently aligned with surgeons' mean total scores, also accurately identifying lower quality surgeries. Untrained students assigned statistically significantly higher scores to the 3 lower quality surgeries as compared with expert surgeons and trained students.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Among trained students, excellent inter-rater reliability and concordance with expert colorectal surgeons was found. The study highlights the potential to engage trained medical students for objective minimally invasive right hemicolectomy video assessment.</p>","PeriodicalId":22152,"journal":{"name":"Surgery","volume":" ","pages":"108951"},"PeriodicalIF":3.2,"publicationDate":"2025-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142772499","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Background: Several risk-stratified studies have compared the outcomes of external and internal pancreatic stents in pancreatoduodenectomy (PD), but no resolute standard for a fistula-mitigation strategy exists. The study investigated the efficacy of these stents in a preoperative risk-stratified setting.
Methods: Data from 285 patients who underwent PD with pancreaticojejunostomy using an external or internal stent from 2015 to 2023 were analyzed. The preoperative pancreatic fistula score (preFRS) was used to classify patients into low-risk (preFRS: 0-5) and high-risk (preFRS: 6-8) groups.
Results: PreFRS accurately predicted the risk of clinically relevant postoperative pancreatic fistula (CR-POPF) as 0% and >40% in patients with preFRS ≤1 and ≥7, respectively. Although no significant difference was observed in postoperative outcomes in low-risk patients, the external stent significantly reduced CR-POPF (21% vs 44%, P = .024) and postpancreatectomy hemorrhage (PPH, 0% vs 19%, P = .02) in high-risk patients, leading to the superiority of the external stent in the entire cohort in terms of CR-POPF (12% vs 24%, P = .033) and PPH (1% vs 11%, P = .013). There were no significant differences in stent-related complications or pancreatic dysfunction. External stent malfunction occurred in 14% and significantly affected CR-POPF development in both low- (20% vs 0%, P < .01) and high-risk groups (60% vs 14%, P = .021).
Conclusion: The external pancreatic stent showed a more beneficial effect on CR-POPF and PPH, especially in high-risk patients, without increasing other complications. Risk-stratified strategy and improving stent management might enhance postoperative outcomes.
背景:多项风险分层研究比较了胰十二指肠切除术(PD)中胰腺外支架和胰腺内支架的疗效,但瘘管缓解策略尚无明确标准。该研究调查了这些支架在术前风险分层设置中的疗效:分析了285名患者的数据,这些患者在2015年至2023年期间使用外支架或内支架接受了胰腺空肠吻合术。采用术前胰瘘评分(preFRS)将患者分为低风险组(preFRS:0-5)和高风险组(preFRS:6-8):结果:前FRS评分≤1和≥7的患者术后发生临床相关性胰瘘(CR-POPF)的风险分别为0%和>40%,而前FRS评分≤1和≥7的患者术后发生临床相关性胰瘘(CR-POPF)的风险分别为0%和>40%。虽然低风险患者的术后结果无明显差异,但外部支架显著降低了高风险患者的CR-POPF(21% vs 44%,P = .024)和胰腺切除术后出血(PPH,0% vs 19%,P = .02),从而使外部支架在整个队列中的CR-POPF(12% vs 24%,P = .033)和PPH(1% vs 11%,P = .013)方面更具优势。在支架相关并发症或胰腺功能障碍方面没有明显差异。14%的患者出现外部支架故障,这对两种低度患者的CR-POPF发展都有显著影响(20% vs 0%,P=0.013):胰腺外支架对CR-POPF和PPH更有利,尤其是对高危患者,同时不会增加其他并发症。风险分层策略和改善支架管理可提高术后效果。
{"title":"Preoperative risk-stratified analysis: External versus internal pancreatic stents in pancreatoduodenectomy.","authors":"Tomotaka Kato, Yuichiro Watanabe, Yasutaka Baba, Yuhei Oshima, Kenichiro Takase, Yukihiro Watanabe, Katsuya Okada, Masayasu Aikawa, Kojun Okamoto, Isamu Koyama","doi":"10.1016/j.surg.2024.09.007","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.surg.2024.09.007","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Several risk-stratified studies have compared the outcomes of external and internal pancreatic stents in pancreatoduodenectomy (PD), but no resolute standard for a fistula-mitigation strategy exists. The study investigated the efficacy of these stents in a preoperative risk-stratified setting.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Data from 285 patients who underwent PD with pancreaticojejunostomy using an external or internal stent from 2015 to 2023 were analyzed. The preoperative pancreatic fistula score (preFRS) was used to classify patients into low-risk (preFRS: 0-5) and high-risk (preFRS: 6-8) groups.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>PreFRS accurately predicted the risk of clinically relevant postoperative pancreatic fistula (CR-POPF) as 0% and >40% in patients with preFRS ≤1 and ≥7, respectively. Although no significant difference was observed in postoperative outcomes in low-risk patients, the external stent significantly reduced CR-POPF (21% vs 44%, P = .024) and postpancreatectomy hemorrhage (PPH, 0% vs 19%, P = .02) in high-risk patients, leading to the superiority of the external stent in the entire cohort in terms of CR-POPF (12% vs 24%, P = .033) and PPH (1% vs 11%, P = .013). There were no significant differences in stent-related complications or pancreatic dysfunction. External stent malfunction occurred in 14% and significantly affected CR-POPF development in both low- (20% vs 0%, P < .01) and high-risk groups (60% vs 14%, P = .021).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The external pancreatic stent showed a more beneficial effect on CR-POPF and PPH, especially in high-risk patients, without increasing other complications. Risk-stratified strategy and improving stent management might enhance postoperative outcomes.</p>","PeriodicalId":22152,"journal":{"name":"Surgery","volume":" ","pages":"108845"},"PeriodicalIF":3.2,"publicationDate":"2025-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142393512","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-02-01Epub Date: 2024-11-26DOI: 10.1016/j.surg.2024.10.010
Lauren M Janczewski, Joseph Cotler, Xuan Zhu, Bryan Palis, Kelley Chan, Ryan P Merkow, Elizabeth B Habermann, Ronald J Weigel, Judy C Boughey
Background: Although cancer prognosis is most commonly estimated by tumor stage, survival is multifactorial. Our objective was to develop an American College of Surgeons "Biliary Tract Cancer Survival Calculator" prototype using machine learning to generate personalized survival estimates based on patient, tumor, and treatment factors.
Methods: The National Cancer Database was used to identify all patients with biliary tract malignancies between 2010 and 2017 including intrahepatic bile duct, extrahepatic bile duct, and gallbladder cancers. Included variables were determined based on random forest algorithms and review by subject matter experts. Data were split into 80% training and 20% test data sets. Extreme gradient boosting with survival embeddings, a machine learning class, generated 3-year survival curves. Internal 5-fold cross validation was evaluated through concordance statistics (c-index), Brier scores, distant calibration, and time-dependent area under the curve.
Results: Overall, 62,877 patients were included. Metastatic disease, age at diagnosis, and lack of surgical treatment were identified as most influential on worse survival outcomes via random forest. The final model included patient (age, sex, race and ethnicity, comorbidities), tumor (clinical TNM stage, disease site, grade), and treatment (surgery, chemotherapy, radiation) factors. Accurate model discrimination, calibration, and performance was demonstrated on internal validation (c-index: 0.74, Brier score: 0.14, distant calibration: P < .001, area under the curve: 0.83). These metrics were notably improved compared to a model based solely on stage (c-index: 0.64, Brier score: 0.18, distant calibration: P < .001, time-dependent area under the curve: 0.68).
Conclusion: This "Biliary Tract Cancer Survival Calculator" represents a highly accurate and comprehensive prognostic tool to estimate individualized survival estimates in real time.
{"title":"American College of Surgeons survival calculator for biliary tract cancers: using machine learning to individualize predictions.","authors":"Lauren M Janczewski, Joseph Cotler, Xuan Zhu, Bryan Palis, Kelley Chan, Ryan P Merkow, Elizabeth B Habermann, Ronald J Weigel, Judy C Boughey","doi":"10.1016/j.surg.2024.10.010","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.surg.2024.10.010","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Although cancer prognosis is most commonly estimated by tumor stage, survival is multifactorial. Our objective was to develop an American College of Surgeons \"Biliary Tract Cancer Survival Calculator\" prototype using machine learning to generate personalized survival estimates based on patient, tumor, and treatment factors.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The National Cancer Database was used to identify all patients with biliary tract malignancies between 2010 and 2017 including intrahepatic bile duct, extrahepatic bile duct, and gallbladder cancers. Included variables were determined based on random forest algorithms and review by subject matter experts. Data were split into 80% training and 20% test data sets. Extreme gradient boosting with survival embeddings, a machine learning class, generated 3-year survival curves. Internal 5-fold cross validation was evaluated through concordance statistics (c-index), Brier scores, distant calibration, and time-dependent area under the curve.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Overall, 62,877 patients were included. Metastatic disease, age at diagnosis, and lack of surgical treatment were identified as most influential on worse survival outcomes via random forest. The final model included patient (age, sex, race and ethnicity, comorbidities), tumor (clinical TNM stage, disease site, grade), and treatment (surgery, chemotherapy, radiation) factors. Accurate model discrimination, calibration, and performance was demonstrated on internal validation (c-index: 0.74, Brier score: 0.14, distant calibration: P < .001, area under the curve: 0.83). These metrics were notably improved compared to a model based solely on stage (c-index: 0.64, Brier score: 0.18, distant calibration: P < .001, time-dependent area under the curve: 0.68).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This \"Biliary Tract Cancer Survival Calculator\" represents a highly accurate and comprehensive prognostic tool to estimate individualized survival estimates in real time.</p>","PeriodicalId":22152,"journal":{"name":"Surgery","volume":" ","pages":"108919"},"PeriodicalIF":3.2,"publicationDate":"2025-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142732921","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}