首页 > 最新文献

Surgery最新文献

英文 中文
Variability of prospective general surgery trials by subspecialty: An analysis of the national clinical trials registry 亚专科前瞻性普外科试验的可变性:对国家临床试验登记的分析。
IF 2.7 2区 医学 Q1 SURGERY Pub Date : 2026-03-01 Epub Date: 2025-11-29 DOI: 10.1016/j.surg.2025.109901
Justin Bauzon MD , Fadlullah Ba'th MD , Brisa Escobedo MD , Melody Y. Zhou BASc , Allan Siperstein MD , Gustavo Romero-Velez MD

Background

Prospective clinical trials provide robust data to drive guideline recommendations and clinical practice. Surgical trials, as opposed to other medical specialties, have been underrepresented. Our aim was to examine how surgical practice is reflected in current prospective clinical trial activity.

Methods

This is a cross-sectional study of ClinicalTrials.gov. We identified all active phase I through IV surgery clinical trials using keywords represented by 5 surgical specialties: general, hepatobiliary, metabolic and bariatric, robotic/minimally invasive, and endocrine. Trials were categorized by intervention (diagnostic, treatment/prevention, surgical technique) and primary outcomes based on surgical phase of care (preoperative, intraoperative, postoperative). Descriptive statistics were used for analysis.

Results

Of 2,708 clinical trials identified, only 429 (16%) pertained to surgery. Hepatobiliary trials constituted a majority (68%) compared with other subspecialties. Among trial interventions, most (73%) focused on treatments, such as anticancer therapies, whereas a minority evaluated diagnostic modalities (12%) or assessed surgical technique (11%). Four out of 5 trial outcomes involved postoperative care (eg, complications or mortality); only 19 (4%) were intraoperative trials.

Conclusions

Surgery trials represent a minority of modern clinical trials. Surgical oncologic specialties make up a significant percentage of trials, likely due to their multidisciplinary nature and rigorous research approaches aimed at treating cancer. Very few trials are studying procedure-based outcomes in the intraoperative phase of care, mirroring the lack of high-quality evidence supporting practices such as surgical technique, and should be prioritized.
背景:前瞻性临床试验为指南推荐和临床实践提供了可靠的数据。与其他医学专业相比,外科试验的代表性不足。我们的目的是研究外科实践如何反映在当前的前瞻性临床试验活动中。方法:这是ClinicalTrials.gov的一项横断面研究。我们通过5个外科专科的关键词确定了所有活跃的I期手术临床试验:普通外科、肝胆外科、代谢和减肥外科、机器人/微创外科和内分泌外科。试验按干预(诊断、治疗/预防、手术技术)和基于手术护理阶段(术前、术中、术后)的主要结局进行分类。采用描述性统计进行分析。结果:在2708个临床试验中,只有429个(16%)与手术有关。与其他亚专科相比,肝胆试验占多数(68%)。在试验干预措施中,大多数(73%)侧重于治疗,如抗癌治疗,而少数评估诊断方式(12%)或评估手术技术(11%)。5个试验结果中有4个涉及术后护理(如并发症或死亡率);只有19例(4%)是术中试验。结论:手术试验只占现代临床试验的一小部分。肿瘤外科专业在试验中占很大比例,可能是由于其多学科性质和旨在治疗癌症的严格研究方法。很少有试验研究术中护理阶段基于程序的结果,反映出缺乏高质量证据支持手术技术等做法,应优先考虑。
{"title":"Variability of prospective general surgery trials by subspecialty: An analysis of the national clinical trials registry","authors":"Justin Bauzon MD ,&nbsp;Fadlullah Ba'th MD ,&nbsp;Brisa Escobedo MD ,&nbsp;Melody Y. Zhou BASc ,&nbsp;Allan Siperstein MD ,&nbsp;Gustavo Romero-Velez MD","doi":"10.1016/j.surg.2025.109901","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.surg.2025.109901","url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Prospective clinical trials provide robust data to drive guideline recommendations and clinical practice. Surgical trials, as opposed to other medical specialties, have been underrepresented. Our aim was to examine how surgical practice is reflected in current prospective clinical trial activity.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>This is a cross-sectional study of <span><span>ClinicalTrials.gov</span><svg><path></path></svg></span>. We identified all active phase I through IV surgery clinical trials using keywords represented by 5 surgical specialties: general, hepatobiliary, metabolic and bariatric, robotic/minimally invasive, and endocrine. Trials were categorized by intervention (diagnostic, treatment/prevention, surgical technique) and primary outcomes based on surgical phase of care (preoperative, intraoperative, postoperative). Descriptive statistics were used for analysis.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Of 2,708 clinical trials identified, only 429 (16%) pertained to surgery. Hepatobiliary trials constituted a majority (68%) compared with other subspecialties. Among trial interventions, most (73%) focused on treatments, such as anticancer therapies, whereas a minority evaluated diagnostic modalities (12%) or assessed surgical technique (11%). Four out of 5 trial outcomes involved postoperative care (eg, complications or mortality); only 19 (4%) were intraoperative trials.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>Surgery trials represent a minority of modern clinical trials. Surgical oncologic specialties make up a significant percentage of trials, likely due to their multidisciplinary nature and rigorous research approaches aimed at treating cancer. Very few trials are studying procedure-based outcomes in the intraoperative phase of care, mirroring the lack of high-quality evidence supporting practices such as surgical technique, and should be prioritized.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":22152,"journal":{"name":"Surgery","volume":"191 ","pages":"Article 109901"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7,"publicationDate":"2026-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145640060","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Does neoadjuvant systemic therapy in clinical T1–2 N0 human epidermal growth factor receptor 2–positive breast cancer increase the extent of axillary surgery? 临床T1-2 N0人表皮生长因子受体2阳性乳腺癌的新辅助全身治疗是否会增加腋窝手术的范围?
IF 2.7 2区 医学 Q1 SURGERY Pub Date : 2026-03-01 Epub Date: 2025-12-12 DOI: 10.1016/j.surg.2025.109907
Christine C. Rogers BS , Lauren N. Cohen BS , Jan Irene C. Lloren RN, MPH , Chiang-Ching Huang PhD , Adrienne N. Cobb MD, MS, FSSO , Amanda L. Kong MD, MS, FSSO, FACS , Puneet Singh MD, MS, FSSO, FACS , Mediget Teshome MD, MPH, FSSO, FACS , Chandler S. Cortina MD, MS, FSSO, FACS

Background

For patients with human epidermal growth factor receptor 2–positive breast cancer, an upfront surgery or neoadjuvant systemic therapy approach can influence the need for axillary lymph node dissection depending on pathologic nodal status. This study aimed to evaluate the impact of an upfront surgery versus neoadjuvant systemic therapy approach in women with cT1–2 human epidermal growth factor receptor 2–positive breast cancer on pathologic nodal status and odds of axillary lymph node dissection.

Methods

This retrospective study used the National Cancer Database and included female patients aged ≥18 years, diagnosed between 2016 and 2021, with cT1–2 N0 M0 human epidermal growth factor receptor 2–positive breast cancer. Demographic, clinicopathologic, and treatment data were collected. Analyses included analysis of variance, Kruskal-Wallis, χ2, Fisher exact tests, and multivariable logistic regression analysis.

Results

A total of 62,927 women met inclusion criteria: 66.6% (n = 39,024) underwent upfront surgery, and 33.4% (n = 19,562) received neoadjuvant systemic therapy. The neoadjuvant systemic therapy cohort was younger (mean age: 53.8 vs 59.9 years, P < .001), had fewer comorbidities (86.9% vs 82.7% with a Charlson-Deyo score of 0, P < .001), and more frequently had cT2 tumors (71.7% vs 21.7%, P < .001). On multivariable analysis, patients with upfront surgery were more likely to be pN+ (1–3 nodes: 14.7% vs 6.8%, odds ratio: 3.19, 95% confidence interval: 2.96–3.45 and ≥4 nodes: 2.0% vs 0.7%, odds ratio: 5.48, 95% confidence interval: 4.43–6.80); however, there was no difference in the odds of axillary lymph node dissection (odds ratio: 0.96, 95% confidence interval: 0.86–1.08).

Conclusion

Patients who underwent upfront surgery had a greater likelihood of being pN+; however, there was no difference in the likelihood of axillary lymph node dissection. Therefore, neoadjuvant systemic therapy use should be based on current systemic therapy guidelines and patient-centered shared multidisciplinary decision-making.
背景:对于人表皮生长因子受体2阳性乳腺癌患者,术前手术或新辅助全身治疗方法可根据病理淋巴结状态影响腋窝淋巴结清扫的需要。本研究旨在评估cT1-2人表皮生长因子受体2阳性乳腺癌患者术前手术与新辅助全身治疗对病理淋巴结状态和腋窝淋巴结清扫几率的影响。方法:本回顾性研究使用国家癌症数据库,纳入年龄≥18岁,2016年至2021年间诊断为cT1-2 N0 M0人表皮生长因子受体2阳性乳腺癌的女性患者。收集了人口统计学、临床病理学和治疗数据。分析包括方差分析、Kruskal-Wallis、χ2、Fisher精确检验和多变量logistic回归分析。结果:共有62,927名女性符合纳入标准:66.6% (n = 39,024)接受了前期手术,33.4% (n = 19,562)接受了新辅助全身治疗。新辅助全身治疗队列更年轻(平均年龄:53.8 vs 59.9岁,P < 0.001),合合症更少(86.9% vs 82.7%, Charlson-Deyo评分为0,P < 0.001),更常见的是cT2肿瘤(71.7% vs 21.7%, P < 0.001)。在多变量分析中,术前手术患者更有可能是pN+(1-3个淋巴结:14.7% vs 6.8%,优势比:3.19,95%可信区间:2.96-3.45,≥4个淋巴结:2.0% vs 0.7%,优势比:5.48,95%可信区间:4.43-6.80);然而,腋窝淋巴结清扫的几率没有差异(优势比:0.96,95%可信区间:0.86-1.08)。结论:接受前期手术的患者更有可能出现pN+;然而,腋窝淋巴结清扫的可能性没有差异。因此,新辅助系统治疗的使用应基于当前的系统治疗指南和以患者为中心的共享多学科决策。
{"title":"Does neoadjuvant systemic therapy in clinical T1–2 N0 human epidermal growth factor receptor 2–positive breast cancer increase the extent of axillary surgery?","authors":"Christine C. Rogers BS ,&nbsp;Lauren N. Cohen BS ,&nbsp;Jan Irene C. Lloren RN, MPH ,&nbsp;Chiang-Ching Huang PhD ,&nbsp;Adrienne N. Cobb MD, MS, FSSO ,&nbsp;Amanda L. Kong MD, MS, FSSO, FACS ,&nbsp;Puneet Singh MD, MS, FSSO, FACS ,&nbsp;Mediget Teshome MD, MPH, FSSO, FACS ,&nbsp;Chandler S. Cortina MD, MS, FSSO, FACS","doi":"10.1016/j.surg.2025.109907","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.surg.2025.109907","url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>For patients with human epidermal growth factor receptor 2–positive breast cancer, an upfront surgery or neoadjuvant systemic therapy approach can influence the need for axillary lymph node dissection depending on pathologic nodal status. This study aimed to evaluate the impact of an upfront surgery versus neoadjuvant systemic therapy approach in women with cT1–2 human epidermal growth factor receptor 2–positive breast cancer on pathologic nodal status and odds of axillary lymph node dissection.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>This retrospective study used the National Cancer Database and included female patients aged ≥18 years, diagnosed between 2016 and 2021, with cT1–2 N0 M0 human epidermal growth factor receptor 2–positive breast cancer. Demographic, clinicopathologic, and treatment data were collected. Analyses included analysis of variance, Kruskal-Wallis, χ<sup>2</sup>, Fisher exact tests, and multivariable logistic regression analysis.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>A total of 62,927 women met inclusion criteria: 66.6% (<em>n</em> = 39,024) underwent upfront surgery, and 33.4% (<em>n</em> = 19,562) received neoadjuvant systemic therapy. The neoadjuvant systemic therapy cohort was younger (mean age: 53.8 vs 59.9 years, <em>P</em> &lt; .001), had fewer comorbidities (86.9% vs 82.7% with a Charlson-Deyo score of 0, <em>P</em> &lt; .001), and more frequently had cT2 tumors (71.7% vs 21.7%, <em>P</em> &lt; .001). On multivariable analysis, patients with upfront surgery were more likely to be pN+ (1–3 nodes: 14.7% vs 6.8%, odds ratio: 3.19, 95% confidence interval: 2.96–3.45 and ≥4 nodes: 2.0% vs 0.7%, odds ratio: 5.48, 95% confidence interval: 4.43–6.80); however, there was no difference in the odds of axillary lymph node dissection (odds ratio: 0.96, 95% confidence interval: 0.86–1.08).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>Patients who underwent upfront surgery had a greater likelihood of being pN+; however, there was no difference in the likelihood of axillary lymph node dissection. Therefore, neoadjuvant systemic therapy use should be based on current systemic therapy guidelines and patient-centered shared multidisciplinary decision-making.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":22152,"journal":{"name":"Surgery","volume":"191 ","pages":"Article 109907"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7,"publicationDate":"2026-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145744726","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
The first full year of histotripsy for liver tumors: Local tumor control and preliminary oncologic efficacy 肝脏肿瘤组织学检查的第一年:局部肿瘤控制和初步肿瘤疗效。
IF 2.7 2区 医学 Q1 SURGERY Pub Date : 2026-03-01 Epub Date: 2025-12-06 DOI: 10.1016/j.surg.2025.109898
Chase J. Wehrle MD , Ahmed F. Sayed Ahmed MD , Emily Knott BA , Hanna Hong BA , Melis Uysal MD , Andrea Schlegel MD, MBA , Eren Berber MD , R. Matthew Walsh MD , JaeKeun Kim MD, PhD , Federico Aucejo MD , David C.H. Kwon MD, PhD
<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Histotripsy is a novel, nonionizing, nonthermal, noninvasive method using focused ultrasound waves to mechanically destroy liver tumors. It received FDA clearance in October 2023. We report the first years' experience at our academic center including, to our knowledge, the first evidence of medium-term oncologic efficacy, reporting local tumor control with this novel approach.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>All patients receiving histotripsy were included (December 20, 2023–November 30, 2024). Contrast-enhanced postoperative day 1, 30-, and 90-day scans are obtained in all patients. Tumor viability was determined by Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumours/modified Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumours criteria. Viable tumor on postoperative day 1 imaging was considered inadequate treatment; patients with nonviable tumors on postoperative day 1 were assessed for tumor control at postoperative day 30 and 90. Tumors with intentional partial treatment of a lesion were excluded from local control analyses. Palliative intent treatment refers to attempted immunologic antitumor priming and is pursued in very advanced tumor cases with no chance at curative therapy. All systemic therapy and anticoagulation are continued in the periprocedural period.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>In all, 109 lesions in 71 patients were treated with histotripsy, with 9% receiving curative intent treatment and 66% treated palliatively. Among those treated with curative intent, 70% showed nonviable lesions at both 30- and 90-day follow-ups, suggesting effective tumor ablation. Overall, 75% of treatments were aimed at complete lesion ablation. Complications were rare, with only 1 (1%) classified as Clavien grade ≥3. In cases of proper targeting, tumor control was excellent: 60 lesions were nonviable on postoperative day 1, all demonstrating nonviable tumors at 30 days. Among these, 23 also had postoperative day 90 imaging; 100% maintained tumor nonviability. Unfortunately, lesion targeting was imperfect, with 60 (74%) of the 82 lesions intended for complete treatment demonstrating postoperative day 1 tumor nonviability. Notably, 19 (23%) of the 82 lesions were treated with palliative intent, whereas 3 (4%) were treated with curative intent. Ten patients were treated with curative intent; 70% (<em>n =</em> 7) had nonviable tumors on postoperative day 1. All such patients demonstrated persistent nonviability on postoperative days 30 and 90. Thus, 70% of patients treated with curative intent achieved no evidence of disease with 1 treatment, whereas 30% had persistent disease. Of these 3 cases, 2 were retreated with histotripsy and converted to no radiologic evidence of disease, with a total rate of no evidence of disease at 90%. There was a slight, although not significant improvement in targeting as providers gained more experience.</div></div><div><h3>Discussion</h3><div>Histotripsy is a safe procedure that is starting to d
背景:组织切片法是一种新颖的、非电离的、非热的、无创的方法,使用聚焦的超声来机械地破坏肝脏肿瘤。它在2023年10月获得了FDA的批准。我们报告了我们学术中心第一年的经验,包括,据我们所知,中期肿瘤疗效的第一个证据,报告了这种新方法的局部肿瘤控制。方法:所有接受组织学检查的患者(202.12.20 - 202.11.30)。所有患者术后第1天、第30天和第90天进行对比增强扫描。肿瘤生存能力由实体肿瘤反应评价标准/实体肿瘤标准修改反应评价标准确定。术后第1天影像学显示存活肿瘤被认为治疗不充分;术后第1天肿瘤不存活的患者在术后第30天和第90天评估肿瘤控制情况。有意部分治疗病变的肿瘤被排除在局部对照分析之外。姑息性意图治疗是指尝试免疫抗肿瘤启动,并在非常晚期的肿瘤病例中进行,没有治愈治疗的机会。围手术期继续进行全身治疗和抗凝治疗。结果:71例患者的109个病变接受了组织学检查,其中9%接受了治愈性治疗,66%接受了姑息性治疗。在以治愈为目的治疗的患者中,70%的患者在30天和90天的随访中显示病变不存活,表明肿瘤消融有效。总的来说,75%的治疗旨在完全消融病变。并发症很少,只有1例(1%)被分类为Clavien≥3级。在适当靶向的情况下,肿瘤控制非常好:60个病变在术后第1天无法存活,所有病变在30天均显示肿瘤无法存活。其中23例术后第90天也有影像学检查;100%维持肿瘤无活力。不幸的是,病灶的靶向性并不完美,82个病灶中有60个(74%)打算进行完全治疗,术后第1天肿瘤无生存能力。值得注意的是,82个病变中有19个(23%)的治疗目的是姑息治疗,而3个(4%)的治疗目的是治愈。10例患者以治愈为目的治疗;70% (n = 7)的患者术后第1天肿瘤无法存活。所有这些患者在术后30天和90天均表现出持续的生存能力丧失。因此,70%的有治愈意图的患者在一次治疗后没有获得疾病的证据,而30%的患者有持续性疾病。3例中,2例经组织学检查复诊,转为无疾病放射学证据,总无疾病证据率为90%。随着供应商获得更多的经验,在目标定位方面有了轻微的改善,尽管不是很明显。讨论:组织切片术是一种安全的手术,当病变被准确定位时,它开始显示出有效控制局部肿瘤的前景。我们的共同努力应该集中在教育和技术进步上,以提高病灶的靶向性,确保完整的治疗是真正彻底的,尽管我们确实注意到靶向成功率可能与大多数治疗的姑息性有关。这种情况反映了消融文献的最初报告,并可能随着学习曲线而改善。
{"title":"The first full year of histotripsy for liver tumors: Local tumor control and preliminary oncologic efficacy","authors":"Chase J. Wehrle MD ,&nbsp;Ahmed F. Sayed Ahmed MD ,&nbsp;Emily Knott BA ,&nbsp;Hanna Hong BA ,&nbsp;Melis Uysal MD ,&nbsp;Andrea Schlegel MD, MBA ,&nbsp;Eren Berber MD ,&nbsp;R. Matthew Walsh MD ,&nbsp;JaeKeun Kim MD, PhD ,&nbsp;Federico Aucejo MD ,&nbsp;David C.H. Kwon MD, PhD","doi":"10.1016/j.surg.2025.109898","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.surg.2025.109898","url":null,"abstract":"&lt;div&gt;&lt;h3&gt;Background&lt;/h3&gt;&lt;div&gt;Histotripsy is a novel, nonionizing, nonthermal, noninvasive method using focused ultrasound waves to mechanically destroy liver tumors. It received FDA clearance in October 2023. We report the first years' experience at our academic center including, to our knowledge, the first evidence of medium-term oncologic efficacy, reporting local tumor control with this novel approach.&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div&gt;&lt;h3&gt;Methods&lt;/h3&gt;&lt;div&gt;All patients receiving histotripsy were included (December 20, 2023–November 30, 2024). Contrast-enhanced postoperative day 1, 30-, and 90-day scans are obtained in all patients. Tumor viability was determined by Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumours/modified Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumours criteria. Viable tumor on postoperative day 1 imaging was considered inadequate treatment; patients with nonviable tumors on postoperative day 1 were assessed for tumor control at postoperative day 30 and 90. Tumors with intentional partial treatment of a lesion were excluded from local control analyses. Palliative intent treatment refers to attempted immunologic antitumor priming and is pursued in very advanced tumor cases with no chance at curative therapy. All systemic therapy and anticoagulation are continued in the periprocedural period.&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div&gt;&lt;h3&gt;Results&lt;/h3&gt;&lt;div&gt;In all, 109 lesions in 71 patients were treated with histotripsy, with 9% receiving curative intent treatment and 66% treated palliatively. Among those treated with curative intent, 70% showed nonviable lesions at both 30- and 90-day follow-ups, suggesting effective tumor ablation. Overall, 75% of treatments were aimed at complete lesion ablation. Complications were rare, with only 1 (1%) classified as Clavien grade ≥3. In cases of proper targeting, tumor control was excellent: 60 lesions were nonviable on postoperative day 1, all demonstrating nonviable tumors at 30 days. Among these, 23 also had postoperative day 90 imaging; 100% maintained tumor nonviability. Unfortunately, lesion targeting was imperfect, with 60 (74%) of the 82 lesions intended for complete treatment demonstrating postoperative day 1 tumor nonviability. Notably, 19 (23%) of the 82 lesions were treated with palliative intent, whereas 3 (4%) were treated with curative intent. Ten patients were treated with curative intent; 70% (&lt;em&gt;n =&lt;/em&gt; 7) had nonviable tumors on postoperative day 1. All such patients demonstrated persistent nonviability on postoperative days 30 and 90. Thus, 70% of patients treated with curative intent achieved no evidence of disease with 1 treatment, whereas 30% had persistent disease. Of these 3 cases, 2 were retreated with histotripsy and converted to no radiologic evidence of disease, with a total rate of no evidence of disease at 90%. There was a slight, although not significant improvement in targeting as providers gained more experience.&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div&gt;&lt;h3&gt;Discussion&lt;/h3&gt;&lt;div&gt;Histotripsy is a safe procedure that is starting to d","PeriodicalId":22152,"journal":{"name":"Surgery","volume":"191 ","pages":"Article 109898"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7,"publicationDate":"2026-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145696388","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Surgeon perspective on the treatment of acute diverticulitis: A survey-based analysis 外科医生对急性憩室炎治疗的看法:基于调查的分析。
IF 2.7 2区 医学 Q1 SURGERY Pub Date : 2026-03-01 Epub Date: 2026-01-12 DOI: 10.1016/j.surg.2025.110048
Samuel A. Younan MD , Andrea Fa MD , Phillip J. Williams MD, MSc , Danish Ali MD , Marissa C. Kuo MD , Aimal Khan MD , Fei Ye PhD, MSPH , Rebecca Irlmeier MS , Bradley M. Dennis MD , Alexander T. Hawkins MD, MPH

Background

Although primary anastomosis (with or without proximal diversion) offers improved morbidity and higher reversal rates compared with Hartmann procedure, little is known about real-world factors influencing surgical decision making in acute diverticulitis.

Methods

We conducted a mixed methods survey of surgeons treating diverticulitis, recruited through national colorectal and acute care/trauma surgical organizations. Surgeons were surveyed on their decision-making process, patient considerations, personal experience, and practice structure using a web-based survey. The primary outcome was percentage of primary anastomoses performed for diverticulitis in the past year.

Results

We recorded 439 survey responses; 233 (53%) were colorectal surgeons and 99 (23%) acute care surgeons. The median (interquartile range) number of primary anastomoses and Hartmann procedures performed for acute diverticulitis in the past year was 3.0 (1.0, 5.0) and 4.0 (2.0, 6.0), respectively, per surgeon. Roughly a third of surgeons reported performing primary anastomosis a majority (58.3%–100%) of the time. High anticipated surgical difficulty and hemodynamic instability were considered the most important situational and patient factors when deciding to perform a Hartmann procedure over a primary anastomosis. On multivariable analysis, acute care surgical specialty (odds ratio 0.41, 95% confidence interval 0.26–0.65; P < .001) was associated with a lower percentage of primary anastomoses performed.

Conclusions

In this national survey, only one-third of surgeons performed primary anastomosis most of the time for diverticulitis. Patient acuity, high anticipated surgical difficulty, and the presence of proper operative assistance are some of the most important factors surgeons consider when deciding between a Hartmann procedure and primary anastomosis.
背景:虽然与Hartmann手术相比,初级吻合(伴或不伴近端分流)的发病率更高,逆转率更高,但对影响急性憩室炎手术决策的现实因素知之甚少。方法:我们对治疗憩室炎的外科医生进行了一项混合方法调查,这些外科医生是通过国家结直肠和急性护理/创伤外科组织招募的。使用基于网络的调查对外科医生的决策过程、患者考虑、个人经验和实践结构进行了调查。主要结果是在过去一年中憩室炎的一期吻合术的百分比。结果:我们记录了439份调查回复;233名(53%)为结直肠外科医生,99名(23%)为急症外科医生。在过去的一年中,每位外科医生对急性憩室炎进行一期吻合术和Hartmann手术的中位数(四分位数范围)分别为3.0例(1.0,5.0)和4.0例(2.0,6.0)。大约三分之一的外科医生报告说,大多数情况下(58.3%-100%)进行了一期吻合。在决定采用Hartmann吻合术而非一期吻合术时,高度预期的手术难度和血流动力学不稳定被认为是最重要的情况和患者因素。在多变量分析中,急症外科专科(优势比0.41,95%可信区间0.26-0.65;P < 0.001)与较低的一期吻合率相关。结论:在这项全国调查中,只有三分之一的外科医生在憩室炎的大多数时间内进行了一期吻合。患者的视力、高预期的手术难度和适当的手术辅助是外科医生在决定采用Hartmann手术还是初级吻合时考虑的一些最重要的因素。
{"title":"Surgeon perspective on the treatment of acute diverticulitis: A survey-based analysis","authors":"Samuel A. Younan MD ,&nbsp;Andrea Fa MD ,&nbsp;Phillip J. Williams MD, MSc ,&nbsp;Danish Ali MD ,&nbsp;Marissa C. Kuo MD ,&nbsp;Aimal Khan MD ,&nbsp;Fei Ye PhD, MSPH ,&nbsp;Rebecca Irlmeier MS ,&nbsp;Bradley M. Dennis MD ,&nbsp;Alexander T. Hawkins MD, MPH","doi":"10.1016/j.surg.2025.110048","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.surg.2025.110048","url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Although primary anastomosis (with or without proximal diversion) offers improved morbidity and higher reversal rates compared with Hartmann procedure, little is known about real-world factors influencing surgical decision making in acute diverticulitis.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>We conducted a mixed methods survey of surgeons treating diverticulitis, recruited through national colorectal and acute care/trauma surgical organizations. Surgeons were surveyed on their decision-making process, patient considerations, personal experience, and practice structure using a web-based survey. The primary outcome was percentage of primary anastomoses performed for diverticulitis in the past year.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>We recorded 439 survey responses; 233 (53%) were colorectal surgeons and 99 (23%) acute care surgeons. The median (interquartile range) number of primary anastomoses and Hartmann procedures performed for acute diverticulitis in the past year was 3.0 (1.0, 5.0) and 4.0 (2.0, 6.0), respectively, per surgeon. Roughly a third of surgeons reported performing primary anastomosis a majority (58.3%–100%) of the time. High anticipated surgical difficulty and hemodynamic instability were considered the most important situational and patient factors when deciding to perform a Hartmann procedure over a primary anastomosis. On multivariable analysis, acute care surgical specialty (odds ratio 0.41, 95% confidence interval 0.26–0.65; <em>P</em> &lt; .001) was associated with a lower percentage of primary anastomoses performed.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>In this national survey, only one-third of surgeons performed primary anastomosis most of the time for diverticulitis. Patient acuity, high anticipated surgical difficulty, and the presence of proper operative assistance are some of the most important factors surgeons consider when deciding between a Hartmann procedure and primary anastomosis.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":22152,"journal":{"name":"Surgery","volume":"191 ","pages":"Article 110048"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7,"publicationDate":"2026-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145966671","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Prospective standardized surveillance of early-stage melanoma on the basis of anatomical staging and molecular profiling: Study design and interim analysis 基于解剖分期和分子谱的早期黑色素瘤前瞻性标准化监测:研究设计和中期分析。
IF 2.7 2区 医学 Q1 SURGERY Pub Date : 2026-03-01 Epub Date: 2025-12-18 DOI: 10.1016/j.surg.2025.109969
Jason M. Aubrey MD , Jesse Kelley MD , Mariam Khan MD , Hordur Kolbeinsson MD , Hannah Liefeld MD , Randa Preihs AGACNP , Alexandra Bengel PA-C , Chantelle Koch PA-C , Lisa Martin PA-C , Jennifer Charchan PA-C , Kimberly Texley-Quigg NP , Marianne Melnik MD , G. Paul Wright MD

Background

Gene expression profiling of cutaneous melanoma has become pervasive in clinical practice, with minimal independent, nonindustry-sponsored, data to guide implementation and influence practice patterns. We developed a scoring system on the basis of anatomic staging and molecular profiling to risk stratify patients into 4 categories for prospective surveillance.

Methods

Patients with cutaneous melanoma were recruited from 2019 to 2023 for enrollment into the study. Inclusion criteria included pathologic stage IA-IIC and use of a commercialized 31-gene expression profile system. Patients were stratified into 1 or 4 surveillance groups: A1 (stage IA-IIA/gene expression profiling class 1), A2 (stage IA-IIA/gene expression profiling class 2), B1 (stage IIB-IIC/gene expression profiling class 1), and B2 (stage IIB-IIC/gene expression profiling class 2). The primary outcome measure is rate of asymptomatic imaging-detected recurrence. Interim analysis has been performed at median follow-up of 24 months.

Results

A total of 200 patients were enrolled. Mean age was 61.0 years (standard deviation, 14.6 years) and 55.5% of the population was male. Primary lesions were distributed between the head and neck (n = 40, 20%), trunk (n = 76, 38%), and extremity (n = 84, 42%). Median depth was 1.1 mm (range, 0.3–8.8 mm) and 14% had ulceration present. Stage distribution was as follows: IA (n = 82, 41.0%), IB (n = 71, 35.5%), IIA (n = 27, 13.5%), IIB (n = 16, 8.0%), and IIC (n = 4, 2.0%). Gene expression profiling classification was class 1 (n = 145, 72.5%) and class 2 (n = 55, 27.5%). This provided a distribution of 71.0% in A1, 19.5% in A2, 2.0% in B1, and 7.5% in B2. Recurrences have been detected in 16 patients (8.0%) including 12 local/regional (6.0%) and 4 distant (2.0%) recurrences. Recurrence rates by surveillance group are: A1 = 4.9%, A2 = 10.3%, B1 = 0%, and B2 = 33.3%. Recurrences were detected by surveillance imaging in 3 (1.5%), history and physical examination in 10 (5.0%), and symptoms in 3 patient (1.5%), respectively.

Conclusion

Pragmatic implementation of a risk-stratified surveillance strategy has resulted in few instances of asymptomatic, imaging-detected recurrences among early-stage cutaneous melanoma patients at short-term follow-up benchmarks. Further follow-up is necessary to determine the validity of this approach.
背景:皮肤黑色素瘤的基因表达谱在临床实践中已经变得普遍,很少有独立的、非行业赞助的数据来指导实施和影响实践模式。我们开发了一个基于解剖分期和分子谱的评分系统,将患者风险分层为4类进行前瞻性监测。方法:从2019年至2023年招募皮肤黑色素瘤患者入组研究。纳入标准包括病理分期IA-IIC和使用商业化的31基因表达谱系统。患者被分为1或4个监测组:A1 (IA-IIA期/基因表达谱1级)、A2 (IA-IIA期/基因表达谱2级)、B1 (IIB-IIC期/基因表达谱1级)和B2 (IIB-IIC期/基因表达谱2级)。主要观察指标是无症状影像学检查复发率。中位随访24个月时进行了中期分析。结果:共纳入200例患者。平均年龄61.0岁(标准差14.6岁),55.5%为男性。原发病灶分布于头颈部(n = 40,20 %)、躯干(n = 76,38 %)和四肢(n = 84,42 %)。中位深度为1.1 mm(范围0.3-8.8 mm), 14%存在溃疡。分期分布如下:IA (n = 82, 41.0%)、IB (n = 71, 35.5%)、IIA (n = 27, 13.5%)、IIB (n = 16, 8.0%)、IIC (n = 4, 2.0%)。基因表达谱分类为1类(n = 145, 72.5%)和2类(n = 55, 27.5%)。A1为71.0%,A2为19.5%,B1为2.0%,B2为7.5%。复发16例(8.0%),其中局部/区域复发12例(6.0%),远处复发4例(2.0%)。监测组复发率A1 = 4.9%, A2 = 10.3%, B1 = 0%, B2 = 33.3%。经影像学检查复发3例(1.5%),病史及体格检查复发10例(5.0%),症状复发3例(1.5%)。结论:在短期随访基准中,风险分层监测策略的务实实施导致早期皮肤黑色素瘤患者无症状,影像学检测到复发的情况很少。需要进一步的随访来确定这种方法的有效性。
{"title":"Prospective standardized surveillance of early-stage melanoma on the basis of anatomical staging and molecular profiling: Study design and interim analysis","authors":"Jason M. Aubrey MD ,&nbsp;Jesse Kelley MD ,&nbsp;Mariam Khan MD ,&nbsp;Hordur Kolbeinsson MD ,&nbsp;Hannah Liefeld MD ,&nbsp;Randa Preihs AGACNP ,&nbsp;Alexandra Bengel PA-C ,&nbsp;Chantelle Koch PA-C ,&nbsp;Lisa Martin PA-C ,&nbsp;Jennifer Charchan PA-C ,&nbsp;Kimberly Texley-Quigg NP ,&nbsp;Marianne Melnik MD ,&nbsp;G. Paul Wright MD","doi":"10.1016/j.surg.2025.109969","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.surg.2025.109969","url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Gene expression profiling of cutaneous melanoma has become pervasive in clinical practice, with minimal independent, nonindustry-sponsored, data to guide implementation and influence practice patterns. We developed a scoring system on the basis of anatomic staging and molecular profiling to risk stratify patients into 4 categories for prospective surveillance.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>Patients with cutaneous melanoma were recruited from 2019 to 2023 for enrollment into the study. Inclusion criteria included pathologic stage IA-IIC and use of a commercialized 31-gene expression profile system. Patients were stratified into 1 or 4 surveillance groups: A1 (stage IA-IIA/gene expression profiling class 1), A2 (stage IA-IIA/gene expression profiling class 2), B1 (stage IIB-IIC/gene expression profiling class 1), and B2 (stage IIB-IIC/gene expression profiling class 2). The primary outcome measure is rate of asymptomatic imaging-detected recurrence. Interim analysis has been performed at median follow-up of 24 months.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>A total of 200 patients were enrolled. Mean age was 61.0 years (standard deviation, 14.6 years) and 55.5% of the population was male. Primary lesions were distributed between the head and neck (<em>n</em> = 40, 20%), trunk (<em>n</em> = 76, 38%), and extremity (<em>n</em> = 84, 42%). Median depth was 1.1 mm (range, 0.3–8.8 mm) and 14% had ulceration present. Stage distribution was as follows: IA (<em>n</em> = 82, 41.0%), IB (<em>n</em> = 71, 35.5%), IIA (<em>n</em> = 27, 13.5%), IIB (<em>n</em> = 16, 8.0%), and IIC (<em>n</em> = 4, 2.0%). Gene expression profiling classification was class 1 (<em>n</em> = 145, 72.5%) and class 2 (<em>n</em> = 55, 27.5%). This provided a distribution of 71.0% in A1, 19.5% in A2, 2.0% in B1, and 7.5% in B2. Recurrences have been detected in 16 patients (8.0%) including 12 local/regional (6.0%) and 4 distant (2.0%) recurrences. Recurrence rates by surveillance group are: A1 = 4.9%, A2 = 10.3%, B1 = 0%, and B2 = 33.3%. Recurrences were detected by surveillance imaging in 3 (1.5%), history and physical examination in 10 (5.0%), and symptoms in 3 patient (1.5%), respectively.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>Pragmatic implementation of a risk-stratified surveillance strategy has resulted in few instances of asymptomatic, imaging-detected recurrences among early-stage cutaneous melanoma patients at short-term follow-up benchmarks. Further follow-up is necessary to determine the validity of this approach.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":22152,"journal":{"name":"Surgery","volume":"191 ","pages":"Article 109969"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7,"publicationDate":"2026-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145795082","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Survival benefit of adjuvant chemotherapy for perihilar cholangiocarcinoma: Impact of log odds of metastatic lymph node count 肝门周围胆管癌辅助化疗的生存获益:转移性淋巴结计数对数的影响。
IF 2.7 2区 医学 Q1 SURGERY Pub Date : 2026-03-01 Epub Date: 2025-12-01 DOI: 10.1016/j.surg.2025.109913
Jun Kawashima MD , Miho Akabane MD , Odysseas P. Chatzipanagiotou MD , Diamantis I. Tsilimigras MD, PhD , Zayed Rashid MD , Mujtaba Khalil MD , Abdullah Altaf MD , Yutaka Endo MD, PhD , Kota Sahara MD, PhD , Federico Aucejo MD , Hugo P. Marques MD , Beatriz Chumbinho MD , Tom Hugh MD , Shishir K. Maithel MD , Bas Groot Koerkamp MD, PhD , Andrea Ruzzenente MD, PhD , Itaru Endo MD, PhD , Timothy M. Pawlik MD, PhD, MPH

Objective

We hypothesized that log odds of metastatic lymph nodes may be an indicator of cancer burden in perihilar cholangiocarcinoma and be used to identify patients who would benefit most from adjuvant chemotherapy. We sought to investigate the interplay between log odds of metastatic lymph nodes and survival benefit of adjuvant chemotherapy in patients with perihilar cholangiocarcinoma.

Methods

Data on patients undergoing curative-intent resection with lymph node dissection for perihilar cholangiocarcinoma were obtained from an international multi-institutional database. Overall survival was examined using multivariable Cox proportional hazards models, including an interaction term between log odds of metastatic lymph nodes and receipt of adjuvant chemotherapy.

Results

Among 388 patients, the median log odds of metastatic lymph nodes was −1.7 (interquartile range: −2.7, −1.1). On multivariable Cox regression, preoperative carbohydrate antigen 19-9 (hazard ratio 1.00, 95% confidence interval 1.00–1.00, P = .035) and undifferentiated tumors (hazard ratio 1.43, 95% confidence interval 1.05–1.95, P = .023) were independent predictors of overall survival. Notably, there was an interaction between log odds of metastatic lymph nodes and adjuvant chemotherapy (hazard ratio 0.79, 95% confidence interval 0.64–0.99, P = .039). In restricted cubic spline analysis, patients with log odds of metastatic lymph nodes ≥ −2.0 were more likely to benefit from adjuvant chemotherapy, whereas patients with log odds of metastatic lymph nodes < −2.0 demonstrated no survival advantage. Among 228 patients with log odds of metastatic lymph nodes ≥ −2.0, adjuvant chemotherapy was associated with improved overall survival (31.3 months vs 20.1 months, P = .030), whereas there was no survival benefit in 160 patients with log odds of metastatic lymph nodes < −2.0 (69.2 months vs 51.0 months, P = .560).

Conclusion

Log odds of metastatic lymph nodes is a predictor of survival benefit from adjuvant chemotherapy in perihilar cholangiocarcinoma. Patients with log odds of metastatic lymph nodes ≥ −2.0 derived survival benefits from adjuvant chemotherapy, whereas patients with log odds of metastatic lymph nodes < −2.0 did not, highlighting the utility of log odds of metastatic lymph nodes to guide adjuvant treatment.
目的:我们假设转移性淋巴结的对数概率可能是门周胆管癌癌症负担的一个指标,并可用于确定哪些患者将从辅助化疗中获益最多。我们试图研究肝门周围胆管癌患者的淋巴结转移率与辅助化疗的生存获益之间的相互作用。方法:从国际多机构数据库中获取肝门周围胆管癌行治疗目的切除合并淋巴结清扫的患者数据。使用多变量Cox比例风险模型检查总生存率,包括转移性淋巴结的对数赔率和接受辅助化疗之间的相互作用项。结果:在388例患者中,淋巴结转移的中位对数赔率为-1.7(四分位数范围:-2.7,-1.1)。在多变量Cox回归中,术前碳水化合物抗原19-9(风险比1.00,95%可信区间1.00-1.00,P = 0.035)和未分化肿瘤(风险比1.43,95%可信区间1.05-1.95,P = 0.023)是总生存率的独立预测因子。值得注意的是,转移性淋巴结的对数几率与辅助化疗之间存在相互作用(风险比0.79,95%可信区间0.64-0.99,P = 0.039)。在限制性三次样条分析中,转移淋巴结的对数赔率≥-2.0的患者更有可能从辅助化疗中获益,而转移淋巴结的对数赔率< -2.0的患者没有生存优势。在228例转移性淋巴结对数比值≥-2.0的患者中,辅助化疗与总生存期的改善相关(31.3个月vs 20.1个月,P = 0.030),而160例转移性淋巴结对数比值< -2.0的患者没有生存获益(69.2个月vs 51.0个月,P = 0.560)。结论:转移性淋巴结的对数概率是门周胆管癌辅助化疗的生存获益的预测因子。转移淋巴结log odds≥-2.0的患者从辅助化疗中获得生存获益,而转移淋巴结log odds < -2.0的患者则没有,突出了转移淋巴结log odds指导辅助治疗的效用。
{"title":"Survival benefit of adjuvant chemotherapy for perihilar cholangiocarcinoma: Impact of log odds of metastatic lymph node count","authors":"Jun Kawashima MD ,&nbsp;Miho Akabane MD ,&nbsp;Odysseas P. Chatzipanagiotou MD ,&nbsp;Diamantis I. Tsilimigras MD, PhD ,&nbsp;Zayed Rashid MD ,&nbsp;Mujtaba Khalil MD ,&nbsp;Abdullah Altaf MD ,&nbsp;Yutaka Endo MD, PhD ,&nbsp;Kota Sahara MD, PhD ,&nbsp;Federico Aucejo MD ,&nbsp;Hugo P. Marques MD ,&nbsp;Beatriz Chumbinho MD ,&nbsp;Tom Hugh MD ,&nbsp;Shishir K. Maithel MD ,&nbsp;Bas Groot Koerkamp MD, PhD ,&nbsp;Andrea Ruzzenente MD, PhD ,&nbsp;Itaru Endo MD, PhD ,&nbsp;Timothy M. Pawlik MD, PhD, MPH","doi":"10.1016/j.surg.2025.109913","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.surg.2025.109913","url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objective</h3><div>We hypothesized that log odds of metastatic lymph nodes may be an indicator of cancer burden in perihilar cholangiocarcinoma and be used to identify patients who would benefit most from adjuvant chemotherapy. We sought to investigate the interplay between log odds of metastatic lymph nodes and survival benefit of adjuvant chemotherapy in patients with perihilar cholangiocarcinoma.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>Data on patients undergoing curative-intent resection with lymph node dissection for perihilar cholangiocarcinoma were obtained from an international multi-institutional database. Overall survival was examined using multivariable Cox proportional hazards models, including an interaction term between log odds of metastatic lymph nodes and receipt of adjuvant chemotherapy.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Among 388 patients, the median log odds of metastatic lymph nodes was −1.7 (interquartile range: −2.7, −1.1). On multivariable Cox regression, preoperative carbohydrate antigen 19-9 (hazard ratio 1.00, 95% confidence interval 1.00–1.00, <em>P</em> = .035) and undifferentiated tumors (hazard ratio 1.43, 95% confidence interval 1.05–1.95, <em>P</em> = .023) were independent predictors of overall survival. Notably, there was an interaction between log odds of metastatic lymph nodes and adjuvant chemotherapy (hazard ratio 0.79, 95% confidence interval 0.64–0.99, <em>P</em> = .039). In restricted cubic spline analysis, patients with log odds of metastatic lymph nodes ≥ −2.0 were more likely to benefit from adjuvant chemotherapy, whereas patients with log odds of metastatic lymph nodes &lt; −2.0 demonstrated no survival advantage. Among 228 patients with log odds of metastatic lymph nodes ≥ −2.0, adjuvant chemotherapy was associated with improved overall survival (31.3 months vs 20.1 months, <em>P</em> = .030), whereas there was no survival benefit in 160 patients with log odds of metastatic lymph nodes &lt; −2.0 (69.2 months vs 51.0 months, <em>P</em> = .560).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>Log odds of metastatic lymph nodes is a predictor of survival benefit from adjuvant chemotherapy in perihilar cholangiocarcinoma. Patients with log odds of metastatic lymph nodes ≥ −2.0 derived survival benefits from adjuvant chemotherapy, whereas patients with log odds of metastatic lymph nodes &lt; −2.0 did not, highlighting the utility of log odds of metastatic lymph nodes to guide adjuvant treatment.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":22152,"journal":{"name":"Surgery","volume":"191 ","pages":"Article 109913"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7,"publicationDate":"2026-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145662063","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Proposal and external validation of a prognosis-oriented TNM staging system for intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma: A multicenter study from the Kansai region of Japan 以预后为导向的肝内胆管癌TNM分期系统的建议和外部验证:一项来自日本关西地区的多中心研究
IF 2.7 2区 医学 Q1 SURGERY Pub Date : 2026-03-01 Epub Date: 2026-01-14 DOI: 10.1016/j.surg.2025.110051
Yusuke Yamamoto MD, PhD , Hisashi Kosaka MD, PhD , Masaki Ueno MD, PhD , Hiroji Shinkawa MD, PhD , Satoshi Yasuda MD, PhD , Koji Komeda MD, PhD , Haruki Mori MD, PhD , Tsukasa Aihara MD, PhD , Shinya Hayami MD, PhD , Masahiko Kinoshita MD, PhD , Nao Kawaguchi MD, PhD , Atsushi Shiozaki MD, PhD , Takeaki Ishizawa MD, PhD , Shoji Kubo MD, PhD , Masaki Kaibori MD, PhD

Introduction

The American Joint Committee on Cancer staging insufficiently reflects the prognosis of intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma.

Methods

Overall, 496 patients from 8 hospitals in the Kansai region (2006–2023) were analyzed. A training set of 405 patients was used to construct the modified TNM staging, and a validation set of 91 patients was used to evaluate its performance.

Results

In the training set, 5-year survival rates exceeded 80% for intraductal growth-type tumors ≤50 mm and mass-forming or periductal infiltrating-type tumors ≤20 mm without vascular invasion, supporting their classification as T1. Extrahepatic vascular invasion, including involvement of the left, right, or main portal vein (median survival time, 16.2 months), inferior vena cava (9.0 months), or hepatic artery (8.4 months), was classified as T4. Tumors with prognostic factors in the multivariate analysis (tumor size >5 cm, vascular invasion, and multifocality [marginally significant]) were classified as T3, whereas tumors measuring 2–5 cm without these factors were classified as T2. Lymph node metastasis was classified as N0 (0 nodes, median survival time: 57.6 months), N1 (1–3 nodes, 22.5 months), and N2 (≥4 nodes, 11.2 months). The stages were defined as follows: IA (T1N0M0), IB (T2N0M0), II (T3N0M0), III (T4N0M0 or anyTN1M0), IVA (anyTN2M0), and IVB (M1). In the validation set, the American Joint Committee on Cancer staging showed overlapping survival for T1b–T4, whereas the new staging stratified survival well.

Conclusion

The proposed staging showed better prognostic stratification than the American Joint Committee on Cancer staging and was validated in an independent cohort.
美国癌症分期联合委员会不能充分反映肝内胆管癌的预后。方法对2006-2023年关西地区8家医院的496例患者进行分析。使用405例患者的训练集构建改进的TNM分期,使用91例患者的验证集评估其性能。结果在训练集中,≤50 mm的导管内生长型肿瘤和≤20 mm无血管侵犯的肿块形成型或导管周围浸润型肿瘤的5年生存率均超过80%,支持T1分类。肝外血管侵犯,包括累及左、右或主门静脉(中位生存时间16.2个月)、下腔静脉(9.0个月)或肝动脉(8.4个月),归为T4。在多因素分析中,有预后因素(肿瘤大小>; 5cm,血管浸润,多灶性[边际显著性])的肿瘤被归类为T3,而没有这些因素的2-5 cm的肿瘤被归类为T2。淋巴结转移分为N0(0个淋巴结,中位生存时间57.6个月)、N1(1-3个淋巴结,22.5个月)和N2(≥4个淋巴结,11.2个月)。分期定义如下:IA (T1N0M0)、IB (T2N0M0)、II (T3N0M0)、III (T4N0M0或anyTN1M0)、IVA (anyTN2M0)、IVB (M1)。在验证集中,美国癌症分期联合委员会显示T1b-T4的生存重叠,而新的分期分层生存良好。结论与美国癌症分期联合委员会相比,提出的分期具有更好的预后分层,并在独立队列中得到验证。
{"title":"Proposal and external validation of a prognosis-oriented TNM staging system for intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma: A multicenter study from the Kansai region of Japan","authors":"Yusuke Yamamoto MD, PhD ,&nbsp;Hisashi Kosaka MD, PhD ,&nbsp;Masaki Ueno MD, PhD ,&nbsp;Hiroji Shinkawa MD, PhD ,&nbsp;Satoshi Yasuda MD, PhD ,&nbsp;Koji Komeda MD, PhD ,&nbsp;Haruki Mori MD, PhD ,&nbsp;Tsukasa Aihara MD, PhD ,&nbsp;Shinya Hayami MD, PhD ,&nbsp;Masahiko Kinoshita MD, PhD ,&nbsp;Nao Kawaguchi MD, PhD ,&nbsp;Atsushi Shiozaki MD, PhD ,&nbsp;Takeaki Ishizawa MD, PhD ,&nbsp;Shoji Kubo MD, PhD ,&nbsp;Masaki Kaibori MD, PhD","doi":"10.1016/j.surg.2025.110051","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.surg.2025.110051","url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><div>The American Joint Committee on Cancer staging insufficiently reflects the prognosis of intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>Overall, 496 patients from 8 hospitals in the Kansai region (2006–2023) were analyzed. A training set of 405 patients was used to construct the modified TNM staging, and a validation set of 91 patients was used to evaluate its performance.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>In the training set, 5-year survival rates exceeded 80% for intraductal growth-type tumors ≤50 mm and mass-forming or periductal infiltrating-type tumors ≤20 mm without vascular invasion, supporting their classification as T1. Extrahepatic vascular invasion, including involvement of the left, right, or main portal vein (median survival time, 16.2 months), inferior vena cava (9.0 months), or hepatic artery (8.4 months), was classified as T4. Tumors with prognostic factors in the multivariate analysis (tumor size &gt;5 cm, vascular invasion, and multifocality [marginally significant]) were classified as T3, whereas tumors measuring 2–5 cm without these factors were classified as T2. Lymph node metastasis was classified as N0 (0 nodes, median survival time: 57.6 months), N1 (1–3 nodes, 22.5 months), and N2 (≥4 nodes, 11.2 months). The stages were defined as follows: IA (T1N0M0), IB (T2N0M0), II (T3N0M0), III (T4N0M0 or anyTN1M0), IVA (anyTN2M0), and IVB (M1). In the validation set, the American Joint Committee on Cancer staging showed overlapping survival for T1b–T4, whereas the new staging stratified survival well.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>The proposed staging showed better prognostic stratification than the American Joint Committee on Cancer staging and was validated in an independent cohort.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":22152,"journal":{"name":"Surgery","volume":"191 ","pages":"Article 110051"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7,"publicationDate":"2026-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145978953","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
The new modified four-factor functional frailty index (mFF-4) in colorectal surgery: A retrospective cohort study 新修订的四因素功能衰弱指数(mFF-4)在结直肠手术中的应用:一项回顾性队列研究
IF 2.7 2区 医学 Q1 SURGERY Pub Date : 2026-03-01 Epub Date: 2026-01-02 DOI: 10.1016/j.surg.2025.109816
Alexandra Z. Agathis MD, Jeanne Wu MPH, Celia M. Divino MD

Background

Since its introduction, the Modified Five-Factor Frailty Index (mFI-5) has been widely applied across subspecialties using the National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (NSQIP) database. Although the mFI-5 index is predictive, it predominantly focuses on comorbidities and does not represent functional frailty aspects. We sought to apply the new Modified Four-Factor Functional Frailty Index (mFF-4) to a colorectal population.

Methods

This retrospective study using NSQIP 2021-2022 includes patients >75 years of age who underwent colon and rectal surgery. The mFF-4 frailty index is scored by adding one point for each present variable including history of falls, dementia, poor nutritional status (body mass index <18.5), and nonindependent functional status. Patients were stratified into frailty groups: mFF-4=0, 1, 2+. Univariate and multivariate regressions were performed to assess 30-day postoperative outcomes. Area under the curve (AUC) and Akaike information criterion (AIC) values assessed predictability of the mFF-4 model, in reference to mFI-5.

Results

Our sample of n=27,875 included 21,573 in the mFF-4=0 (77.4%), 4,601 in mFF-4=1 (16.5%), and 1,701 in mFF-4=2+ (6.1%). The mFF-4 multivariate regressions had less error (lower AICs by >2) and higher AUCs (most >0.7) than the mFI-5 for predicting mortality, pneumonia, ventilator use >48 hours, delirium, length of stay >30 days, and nonhome discharge destination. For these complications, patients with high frailty (mFF-4=2+) had statistically significant odds ratios >2.0.

Conclusion

This new frailty index, focused on functional capabilities, is more encompassing of phenotypical frailty and is more predictive than the mFI-5. This new scale will help risk-stratify our aging colorectal population.
自引入以来,修正五因子衰弱指数(mFI-5)已在国家外科质量改进计划(NSQIP)数据库中广泛应用于亚专科。虽然mFI-5指数具有预测性,但它主要关注合并症,并不代表功能衰弱方面。我们试图将新的修正四因素功能脆弱指数(mFF-4)应用于结直肠人群。方法采用NSQIP 2021-2022进行回顾性研究,纳入75岁接受结肠和直肠手术的患者。mFF-4虚弱指数是通过为每一个当前变量加1分来评分的,这些变量包括跌倒史、痴呆、营养状况不良(体重指数18.5)和非独立的功能状态。将患者分为虚弱组:mFF-4=0、1、2+。采用单因素和多因素回归评估术后30天的预后。曲线下面积(AUC)和赤池信息准则(Akaike information criterion, AIC)值评价了mFF-4模式参考mFI-5的可预测性。结果样本n= 27875例,其中mFF-4=0组21573例(77.4%),mFF-4=1组4601例(16.5%),mFF-4=2+组1701例(6.1%)。与mFI-5相比,mFF-4多变量回归在预测死亡率、肺炎、呼吸机使用时间(48小时)、谵妄、住院时间(30天)和非家庭出院目的地方面的误差更小(AICs低>;2), auc高>;0.7。对于这些并发症,高虚弱患者(mFF-4=2+)的优势比为2.0,具有统计学意义。结论与mFI-5相比,这一关注功能能力的新脆弱性指数更能涵盖表型脆弱性,并具有更强的预测性。这种新的量表将有助于对结直肠癌老年人群进行风险分层。
{"title":"The new modified four-factor functional frailty index (mFF-4) in colorectal surgery: A retrospective cohort study","authors":"Alexandra Z. Agathis MD,&nbsp;Jeanne Wu MPH,&nbsp;Celia M. Divino MD","doi":"10.1016/j.surg.2025.109816","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.surg.2025.109816","url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Since its introduction, the Modified Five-Factor Frailty Index (mFI-5) has been widely applied across subspecialties using the National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (NSQIP) database. Although the mFI-5 index is predictive, it predominantly focuses on comorbidities and does not represent functional frailty aspects. We sought to apply the new Modified Four-Factor Functional Frailty Index (mFF-4) to a colorectal population.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>This retrospective study using NSQIP 2021-2022 includes patients &gt;75 years of age who underwent colon and rectal surgery. The mFF-4 frailty index is scored by adding one point for each present variable including history of falls, dementia, poor nutritional status (body mass index &lt;18.5), and nonindependent functional status. Patients were stratified into frailty groups: mFF-4=0, 1, 2+. Univariate and multivariate regressions were performed to assess 30-day postoperative outcomes. Area under the curve (AUC) and Akaike information criterion (AIC) values assessed predictability of the mFF-4 model, in reference to mFI-5.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Our sample of n=27,875 included 21,573 in the mFF-4=0 (77.4%), 4,601 in mFF-4=1 (16.5%), and 1,701 in mFF-4=2+ (6.1%). The mFF-4 multivariate regressions had less error (lower AICs by &gt;2) and higher AUCs (most &gt;0.7) than the mFI-5 for predicting mortality, pneumonia, ventilator use &gt;48 hours, delirium, length of stay &gt;30 days, and nonhome discharge destination. For these complications, patients with high frailty (mFF-4=2+) had statistically significant odds ratios &gt;2.0.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>This new frailty index, focused on functional capabilities, is more encompassing of phenotypical frailty and is more predictive than the mFI-5. This new scale will help risk-stratify our aging colorectal population.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":22152,"journal":{"name":"Surgery","volume":"191 ","pages":"Article 109816"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7,"publicationDate":"2026-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145876920","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
The significance of radiologic main duct dilatation in pancreatic intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasms 胰腺导管内乳头状黏液性肿瘤放射线主管扩张的意义。
IF 2.7 2区 医学 Q1 SURGERY Pub Date : 2026-03-01 Epub Date: 2025-12-04 DOI: 10.1016/j.surg.2025.109921
Pranav Kumar BA , Chase J. Wehrle MD , Abby Gross MD , Muhammad A. Nadeem MD , Breanna Perlmutter MD , Hanna Hong BS , Jenny Chang MD , Robert Naples MD , Kathryn Stackhouse MD , John McMichael PhD , Samer Naffouje MD , Daniel Joyce MD , Robert Simon MD , Toms Augustin MD, MPH , Daniela Allende MD , R. Matthew Walsh MD
<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasms are cystic neoplasms of the pancreas with a risk of malignant transformation. They are categorized based on morphology and ductal involvement. Compared with side-branch intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasms, main duct intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasms and mixed-type intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasms are generally considered high risk. Radiologic main pancreatic duct dilatation is a recognized risk factor for high-grade dysplasia and/or invasive carcinoma. Studies thus far have not explored the association between radiologic main pancreatic duct dilatation and dysplasia of the main pancreatic duct epithelium on surgical pathology.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>An institutional database of intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasms was queried for patients from 1997 to 2023 undergoing resection of a main duct or mixed-type intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasm with radiologic diagnosis of main pancreatic duct dilatation before surgery. The χ<sup>2</sup> test, <em>t</em> test, logistic regression modeling, and Youden's index analysis were performed to test the association between "true" main pancreatic duct dysplasia involvement in surgical pathology reports and main pancreatic duct dilatation, as well as high-risk pathology (high-grade dysplasia or invasive carcinoma).</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>A total of 91 patients were included in the final analysis. Radiologic main duct intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasms were more likely to demonstrate "true" main duct involvement versus mixed-type intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasms (79% vs 41%, <em>P</em> = .001). Among intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasms with true main pancreatic duct dysplasia, main duct intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasms were more likely than mixed-type intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasms to demonstrate invasive carcinoma on surgical pathology (27% vs 10%, <em>P</em> = .047). Cyst size was not predictive of main pancreatic duct dysplasia for mixed-type intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasms. Main pancreatic duct >9 mm at diagnosis was associated with increased likelihood of true main pancreatic duct dysplasia (odds ratio = 3.33, 95% confidence interval = 1.16–9.61 <em>P</em> = .026). Youden's index analysis demonstrated that a main pancreatic duct cutoff of 8.5 mm provided the greatest capability to predict main pancreatic duct dysplasia.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>Mixed-type intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasm confers less dysplasia risk in the main pancreatic duct, supporting maintaining the distinction of mixed-type and main duct intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasm due to potentially different management. This study reaffirms the use of main pancreatic duct dilatation in intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasm risk stratification, because main pancreatic duct dilatation >8 mm was predictive of main pancreatic duct epithelial dys
背景:导管内乳头状粘液瘤是胰腺的囊性肿瘤,有恶性转化的危险。它们是根据形态和导管受累程度来分类的。与侧支导管内乳头状黏液性肿瘤相比,主导管内乳头状黏液性肿瘤和混合型导管内乳头状黏液性肿瘤通常被认为是高风险的。放射学上的主胰管扩张是高度不典型增生和/或浸润性癌的公认危险因素。迄今为止的研究尚未探讨放射学上的主胰管扩张与手术病理上主胰管上皮发育不良之间的关系。方法:查询1997 - 2023年行主胰管切除术或混合型导管内乳头状粘液瘤的机构数据库,术前影像学诊断为主胰管扩张。采用χ2检验、t检验、logistic回归模型和Youden指数分析,检验手术病理报告中“真实”主胰管发育不良与主胰管扩张及高危病理(高级别发育不良或浸润性癌)之间的相关性。结果:91例患者纳入最终分析。与混合型导管内乳头状粘液瘤相比,放射学上的导管内乳头状粘液瘤更有可能显示“真正的”导管累及(79% vs 41%, P = .001)。在真主胰管发育不良的导管内乳头状黏液性肿瘤中,导管内乳头状黏液性肿瘤比混合型导管内乳头状黏液性肿瘤更容易在手术病理上表现为浸润性癌(27% vs 10%, P = 0.047)。对于混合型导管内乳头状黏液性肿瘤,囊肿大小不能预测主胰管发育不良。诊断时主胰管bbb9 mm与真正的主胰管发育不良的可能性增加相关(优势比= 3.33,95%可信区间= 1.16-9.61 P = 0.026)。约登指数分析表明,主胰管截断8.5 mm是预测主胰管发育不良的最佳指标。结论:混合型导管内乳头状黏液性肿瘤主胰管发育不良的风险较低,支持维持混合型与主胰管导管内乳头状黏液性肿瘤的区别,因为治疗方法可能不同。本研究重申了主胰管扩张在导管内乳头状黏液性肿瘤风险分层中的应用,因为主胰管扩张bbb8mm可预测主胰管上皮发育不良和高危病理。
{"title":"The significance of radiologic main duct dilatation in pancreatic intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasms","authors":"Pranav Kumar BA ,&nbsp;Chase J. Wehrle MD ,&nbsp;Abby Gross MD ,&nbsp;Muhammad A. Nadeem MD ,&nbsp;Breanna Perlmutter MD ,&nbsp;Hanna Hong BS ,&nbsp;Jenny Chang MD ,&nbsp;Robert Naples MD ,&nbsp;Kathryn Stackhouse MD ,&nbsp;John McMichael PhD ,&nbsp;Samer Naffouje MD ,&nbsp;Daniel Joyce MD ,&nbsp;Robert Simon MD ,&nbsp;Toms Augustin MD, MPH ,&nbsp;Daniela Allende MD ,&nbsp;R. Matthew Walsh MD","doi":"10.1016/j.surg.2025.109921","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.surg.2025.109921","url":null,"abstract":"&lt;div&gt;&lt;h3&gt;Background&lt;/h3&gt;&lt;div&gt;Intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasms are cystic neoplasms of the pancreas with a risk of malignant transformation. They are categorized based on morphology and ductal involvement. Compared with side-branch intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasms, main duct intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasms and mixed-type intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasms are generally considered high risk. Radiologic main pancreatic duct dilatation is a recognized risk factor for high-grade dysplasia and/or invasive carcinoma. Studies thus far have not explored the association between radiologic main pancreatic duct dilatation and dysplasia of the main pancreatic duct epithelium on surgical pathology.&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div&gt;&lt;h3&gt;Methods&lt;/h3&gt;&lt;div&gt;An institutional database of intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasms was queried for patients from 1997 to 2023 undergoing resection of a main duct or mixed-type intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasm with radiologic diagnosis of main pancreatic duct dilatation before surgery. The χ&lt;sup&gt;2&lt;/sup&gt; test, &lt;em&gt;t&lt;/em&gt; test, logistic regression modeling, and Youden's index analysis were performed to test the association between \"true\" main pancreatic duct dysplasia involvement in surgical pathology reports and main pancreatic duct dilatation, as well as high-risk pathology (high-grade dysplasia or invasive carcinoma).&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div&gt;&lt;h3&gt;Results&lt;/h3&gt;&lt;div&gt;A total of 91 patients were included in the final analysis. Radiologic main duct intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasms were more likely to demonstrate \"true\" main duct involvement versus mixed-type intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasms (79% vs 41%, &lt;em&gt;P&lt;/em&gt; = .001). Among intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasms with true main pancreatic duct dysplasia, main duct intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasms were more likely than mixed-type intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasms to demonstrate invasive carcinoma on surgical pathology (27% vs 10%, &lt;em&gt;P&lt;/em&gt; = .047). Cyst size was not predictive of main pancreatic duct dysplasia for mixed-type intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasms. Main pancreatic duct &gt;9 mm at diagnosis was associated with increased likelihood of true main pancreatic duct dysplasia (odds ratio = 3.33, 95% confidence interval = 1.16–9.61 &lt;em&gt;P&lt;/em&gt; = .026). Youden's index analysis demonstrated that a main pancreatic duct cutoff of 8.5 mm provided the greatest capability to predict main pancreatic duct dysplasia.&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div&gt;&lt;h3&gt;Conclusion&lt;/h3&gt;&lt;div&gt;Mixed-type intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasm confers less dysplasia risk in the main pancreatic duct, supporting maintaining the distinction of mixed-type and main duct intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasm due to potentially different management. This study reaffirms the use of main pancreatic duct dilatation in intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasm risk stratification, because main pancreatic duct dilatation &gt;8 mm was predictive of main pancreatic duct epithelial dys","PeriodicalId":22152,"journal":{"name":"Surgery","volume":"191 ","pages":"Article 109921"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7,"publicationDate":"2026-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145688122","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Outcome of routine discharge after a 4-hour postanesthesia care stay following thyroid lobectomy 甲状腺小叶切除术后4小时麻醉后护理的常规出院结果。
IF 2.7 2区 医学 Q1 SURGERY Pub Date : 2026-03-01 Epub Date: 2025-12-11 DOI: 10.1016/j.surg.2025.109968
Ali M. Kara MD , Susan M. Conte PA-C , Abby Turza CNP , Ramiro Cadena Semanate MD , Ashwini R. Sehgal MD , Christopher R. McHenry MD

Background

Patients who undergo thyroid lobectomy are routinely observed for 4 hours in the postanesthesia care unit and are discharged if there is no evidence of neck hematoma. The aim of this study was to determine the outcome of routine discharge after a 4-hour observation following thyroid lobectomy.

Methods

A retrospective review of consecutive patients who underwent thyroid lobectomy from 2008 to 2023 was completed. Patients were evaluated for neck hematoma requiring urgent evacuation, emergency department visits, and hospital readmission. Univariate analysis and multivariate regression analysis were used to analyze potential factors associated with an unsuccessful discharge after 4 hours of observation.

Results

A total of 494 patients underwent thyroid lobectomy; 330 (67%) were discharged after a 4-hour postanesthesia care unit stay (group I), and 164 (33%) were observed overnight (group II). Neck hematoma occurred in 2 (0.4%) patients before they were both discharged. Thirty-seven (7%) patients presented to the emergency department, 23 (7%) from group I and 14 (9%) from group II (P = .53). Six (1%) patients were readmitted, 3 (1%) from groups I and 3 (2%) from group II (P = .38). Factors independently associated with an overnight stay and their odds ratio and confidence interval were dependent status (10.76, 2.18–53.07), American Society of Anesthesiologists class ≥3 (5.32, 2.04–13.86), increased blood loss (4.00, 1.04–2.45), age >50 years (2.68, 1.38–5.20 years), and substernal extension (1.60, 1.04–2.45).

Conclusion

Discharge to home after 4 hours of observation is safe after thyroid lobectomy. However, patients who are older, dependent, have an American Society of Anesthesiologists score ≥3, or undergo a more difficult operation should be prepared for overnight observation.
背景:接受甲状腺小叶切除术的患者在麻醉后护理病房常规观察4小时,如果没有颈部血肿的证据则出院。本研究的目的是确定甲状腺叶切除术后4小时观察后的常规出院结果。方法:回顾性分析2008年至2023年连续行甲状腺小叶切除术的患者。评估患者是否有颈部血肿,是否需要紧急疏散、急诊室就诊和再入院。观察4小时后,采用单因素分析和多因素回归分析,分析不成功出院的潜在因素。结果:共494例患者行甲状腺叶切除术;330例(67%)麻醉后住院4小时后出院(I组),164例(33%)留宿(II组)。2例(0.4%)患者均在出院前发生颈部血肿。37例(7%)患者就诊于急诊科,其中23例(7%)来自I组,14例(9%)来自II组(P = .53)。6例(1%)患者再次入院,其中3例(1%)来自I组,3例(2%)来自II组(P = .38)。与住院时间独立相关的因素及其比值比和置信区间为:依赖状态(10.76,2.18-53.07)、美国麻醉医师学会分级≥3级(5.32,2.04-13.86)、出血量增加(4.00,1.04-2.45)、年龄0 - 50岁(2.68,1.38-5.20岁)、胸骨下伸展(1.60,1.04-2.45)。结论:甲状腺小叶切除术后观察4小时出院是安全的。然而,年龄较大、依赖他人、美国麻醉医师学会评分≥3分或手术难度较大的患者应准备过夜观察。
{"title":"Outcome of routine discharge after a 4-hour postanesthesia care stay following thyroid lobectomy","authors":"Ali M. Kara MD ,&nbsp;Susan M. Conte PA-C ,&nbsp;Abby Turza CNP ,&nbsp;Ramiro Cadena Semanate MD ,&nbsp;Ashwini R. Sehgal MD ,&nbsp;Christopher R. McHenry MD","doi":"10.1016/j.surg.2025.109968","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.surg.2025.109968","url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Patients who undergo thyroid lobectomy are routinely observed for 4 hours in the postanesthesia care unit and are discharged if there is no evidence of neck hematoma. The aim of this study was to determine the outcome of routine discharge after a 4-hour observation following thyroid lobectomy.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>A retrospective review of consecutive patients who underwent thyroid lobectomy from 2008 to 2023 was completed. Patients were evaluated for neck hematoma requiring urgent evacuation, emergency department visits, and hospital readmission. Univariate analysis and multivariate regression analysis were used to analyze potential factors associated with an unsuccessful discharge after 4 hours of observation.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>A total of 494 patients underwent thyroid lobectomy; 330 (67%) were discharged after a 4-hour postanesthesia care unit stay (group I), and 164 (33%) were observed overnight (group II). Neck hematoma occurred in 2 (0.4%) patients before they were both discharged. Thirty-seven (7%) patients presented to the emergency department, 23 (7%) from group I and 14 (9%) from group II (<em>P</em> = .53). Six (1%) patients were readmitted, 3 (1%) from groups I and 3 (2%) from group II (<em>P</em> = .38). Factors independently associated with an overnight stay and their odds ratio and confidence interval were dependent status (10.76, 2.18–53.07), American Society of Anesthesiologists class ≥3 (5.32, 2.04–13.86), increased blood loss (4.00, 1.04–2.45), age &gt;50 years (2.68, 1.38–5.20 years), and substernal extension (1.60, 1.04–2.45).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>Discharge to home after 4 hours of observation is safe after thyroid lobectomy. However, patients who are older, dependent, have an American Society of Anesthesiologists score ≥3, or undergo a more difficult operation should be prepared for overnight observation.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":22152,"journal":{"name":"Surgery","volume":"191 ","pages":"Article 109968"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7,"publicationDate":"2026-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145744352","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
期刊
Surgery
全部 Acc. Chem. Res. ACS Applied Bio Materials ACS Appl. Electron. Mater. ACS Appl. Energy Mater. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces ACS Appl. Nano Mater. ACS Appl. Polym. Mater. ACS BIOMATER-SCI ENG ACS Catal. ACS Cent. Sci. ACS Chem. Biol. ACS Chemical Health & Safety ACS Chem. Neurosci. ACS Comb. Sci. ACS Earth Space Chem. ACS Energy Lett. ACS Infect. Dis. ACS Macro Lett. ACS Mater. Lett. ACS Med. Chem. Lett. ACS Nano ACS Omega ACS Photonics ACS Sens. ACS Sustainable Chem. Eng. ACS Synth. Biol. Anal. Chem. BIOCHEMISTRY-US Bioconjugate Chem. BIOMACROMOLECULES Chem. Res. Toxicol. Chem. Rev. Chem. Mater. CRYST GROWTH DES ENERG FUEL Environ. Sci. Technol. Environ. Sci. Technol. Lett. Eur. J. Inorg. Chem. IND ENG CHEM RES Inorg. Chem. J. Agric. Food. Chem. J. Chem. Eng. Data J. Chem. Educ. J. Chem. Inf. Model. J. Chem. Theory Comput. J. Med. Chem. J. Nat. Prod. J PROTEOME RES J. Am. Chem. Soc. LANGMUIR MACROMOLECULES Mol. Pharmaceutics Nano Lett. Org. Lett. ORG PROCESS RES DEV ORGANOMETALLICS J. Org. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. A J. Phys. Chem. B J. Phys. Chem. C J. Phys. Chem. Lett. Analyst Anal. Methods Biomater. Sci. Catal. Sci. Technol. Chem. Commun. Chem. Soc. Rev. CHEM EDUC RES PRACT CRYSTENGCOMM Dalton Trans. Energy Environ. Sci. ENVIRON SCI-NANO ENVIRON SCI-PROC IMP ENVIRON SCI-WAT RES Faraday Discuss. Food Funct. Green Chem. Inorg. Chem. Front. Integr. Biol. J. Anal. At. Spectrom. J. Mater. Chem. A J. Mater. Chem. B J. Mater. Chem. C Lab Chip Mater. Chem. Front. Mater. Horiz. MEDCHEMCOMM Metallomics Mol. Biosyst. Mol. Syst. Des. Eng. Nanoscale Nanoscale Horiz. Nat. Prod. Rep. New J. Chem. Org. Biomol. Chem. Org. Chem. Front. PHOTOCH PHOTOBIO SCI PCCP Polym. Chem.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1