In response to the emerging COVID-19 public health emergency in March 2020, the Medical University of South Carolina rapidly implemented an analytics-enhanced remote patient monitoring (RPM) program with state-wide reach for SARS-CoV-2-positive patients. Patient-reported data and other analytics were used to prioritize the sickest patients for contact by RPM nurses, enabling a small cadre of RPM nurses, with the support of ambulatory providers and urgent care video visits, to oversee 1234 patients, many of whom were older, from underserved populations, or at high risk of serious complications. Care was escalated based on prespecified criteria to primary care provider or emergency department visit, with 89% of moderate- to high-risk patients treated solely at home. The RPM nurses facilitated the continuity of care during escalation or de-escalation of care, provided much-needed emotional support to patients quarantining at home and helped find medical homes for patients with tenuous ties to health care.
{"title":"Not Home Alone: Leveraging Telehealth and Informatics to Create a Lean Model for COVID-19 Patient Home Care.","authors":"Dee Ford, Emily Warr, Cheryl Hamill, Wenjun He, Ekaterina Pekar, Jillian Harvey, Ragan DuBose-Morris, Kimberly McGhee, Kathryn King, Leslie Lenert","doi":"10.1089/tmr.2021.0020","DOIUrl":"10.1089/tmr.2021.0020","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>In response to the emerging COVID-19 public health emergency in March 2020, the Medical University of South Carolina rapidly implemented an analytics-enhanced remote patient monitoring (RPM) program with state-wide reach for SARS-CoV-2-positive patients. Patient-reported data and other analytics were used to prioritize the sickest patients for contact by RPM nurses, enabling a small cadre of RPM nurses, with the support of ambulatory providers and urgent care video visits, to oversee 1234 patients, many of whom were older, from underserved populations, or at high risk of serious complications. Care was escalated based on prespecified criteria to primary care provider or emergency department visit, with 89% of moderate- to high-risk patients treated solely at home. The RPM nurses facilitated the continuity of care during escalation or de-escalation of care, provided much-needed emotional support to patients quarantining at home and helped find medical homes for patients with tenuous ties to health care.</p>","PeriodicalId":22295,"journal":{"name":"Telemedicine reports","volume":" ","pages":"239-246"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2021-10-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8621622/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"39927588","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2021-10-27eCollection Date: 2021-01-01DOI: 10.1089/tmr.2021.0019
Robert Tanouye, Jodie Nghiem, Kaela Cohan, Jane Torres-Lavoro, Kaitlin Schullstrom, Mary Mulcare, Rahul Sharma
Purpose: The COVID-19 pandemic limited pre-clinical medical students from participating in traditional clinical in-person shadowing. Rather than eliminating clinical shadowing from an established leadership course, we describe the experience of six pre-clinical medical students shadowing physician preceptors remotely through virtual platforms. Methods: Six pre-clinical medical students enrolled in 2020's Weill Cornell Medicine's Healthcare Leadership and Management Scholars Program were prepared with training materials for on-camera patient care. Students shadowed emergency medicine (EM) physicians providing clinical care in one of our New York Presbyterian emergency departments (EDs) and through telemedicine. Pre- and postsurveys were provided to these students. Results: From three different U.S. time zones, students were safely able to shadow EM physicians. The educational fidelity was maintained in physician-student relationships, but revealed opportunities for improvement in students' clinical learning, in ED clinical care, and in telemedicine visits. Conclusions: Virtual clinical shadowing is a viable option for pre-clinical students, when in-person options are not available. With logistical adjustments, this medium may be a long-term educational option especially for telemedicine.
{"title":"Virtual Clinical Shadowing for Pre-Clinical Medical Students in an Emergency Medicine-Based Leadership Course.","authors":"Robert Tanouye, Jodie Nghiem, Kaela Cohan, Jane Torres-Lavoro, Kaitlin Schullstrom, Mary Mulcare, Rahul Sharma","doi":"10.1089/tmr.2021.0019","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1089/tmr.2021.0019","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b><i>Purpose:</i></b> The COVID-19 pandemic limited pre-clinical medical students from participating in traditional clinical in-person shadowing. Rather than eliminating clinical shadowing from an established leadership course, we describe the experience of six pre-clinical medical students shadowing physician preceptors remotely through virtual platforms. <b><i>Methods:</i></b> Six pre-clinical medical students enrolled in 2020's Weill Cornell Medicine's Healthcare Leadership and Management Scholars Program were prepared with training materials for on-camera patient care. Students shadowed emergency medicine (EM) physicians providing clinical care in one of our New York Presbyterian emergency departments (EDs) and through telemedicine. Pre- and postsurveys were provided to these students. <b><i>Results:</i></b> From three different U.S. time zones, students were safely able to shadow EM physicians. The educational fidelity was maintained in physician-student relationships, but revealed opportunities for improvement in students' clinical learning, in ED clinical care, and in telemedicine visits. <b><i>Conclusions:</i></b> Virtual clinical shadowing is a viable option for pre-clinical students, when in-person options are not available. With logistical adjustments, this medium may be a long-term educational option especially for telemedicine.</p>","PeriodicalId":22295,"journal":{"name":"Telemedicine reports","volume":" ","pages":"233-238"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2021-10-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9049813/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"40024813","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2021-10-12eCollection Date: 2021-01-01DOI: 10.1089/tmr.2021.0021
Catherine Enochs, Amy G Filbrun, Courtney Iwanicki, Haley Moraniec, Julie Lehrmann, Jourdan Stiffler, Sharyn Dagher, Chris Tapley, Hanna Phan, Rebekah Raines, Samya Z Nasr
Background: People with cystic fibrosis (PCF) have unique physical and emotional needs, which are best met through interdisciplinary care (IDC). In the midst of the pandemic, our center aimed to begin a telehealth care model with an objective to increase successful care visits from baseline of 0-95% by June 26, 2020, including meeting cystic fibrosis (CF) care standards of IDC visits that are coproduced through agenda setting with PCF. Methods: Shifting IDC for pediatric CF patients to telehealth was part of a quality improvement initiative. Our team used asynchronous virtual visits (VVs), with the IDC team members' VVs done on different days than the physician's. Multiple plan-do-study-act cycles were completed to address evolving telehealth needs, including IDC team member flow logistics, communication with PCF, and surveying PCF for the patient perspective. Rates of IDC and agenda setting were measured from March 16, 2020 to June 26, 2020. Results: IDC VVs were at 86% in March 2020 with fluctuations until mid-May when we reached 100% and achieved sustainability. Agenda setting was reached at 100% and maintained. With continued effort, an additional 46.3% of PCF registered for the patient portal, totaling 90.6% with access. Our survey revealed 100% of PCF were able to see IDC team members that they needed to, with 87% "extremely satisfied" and 13% "somewhat satisfied" with their telehealth experience. Conclusions: Successful telehealth in pediatric CF IDC can be achieved through continuous communication, optimal utilization of available technologies, and may help foster unique opportunities to help improve health outcomes.
{"title":"Development of an Interdisciplinary Telehealth Care Model in a Pediatric Cystic Fibrosis Center.","authors":"Catherine Enochs, Amy G Filbrun, Courtney Iwanicki, Haley Moraniec, Julie Lehrmann, Jourdan Stiffler, Sharyn Dagher, Chris Tapley, Hanna Phan, Rebekah Raines, Samya Z Nasr","doi":"10.1089/tmr.2021.0021","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1089/tmr.2021.0021","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Background:</b> People with cystic fibrosis (PCF) have unique physical and emotional needs, which are best met through interdisciplinary care (IDC). In the midst of the pandemic, our center aimed to begin a telehealth care model with an objective to increase successful care visits from baseline of 0-95% by June 26, 2020, including meeting cystic fibrosis (CF) care standards of IDC visits that are coproduced through agenda setting with PCF. <b>Methods:</b> Shifting IDC for pediatric CF patients to telehealth was part of a quality improvement initiative. Our team used asynchronous virtual visits (VVs), with the IDC team members' VVs done on different days than the physician's. Multiple plan-do-study-act cycles were completed to address evolving telehealth needs, including IDC team member flow logistics, communication with PCF, and surveying PCF for the patient perspective. Rates of IDC and agenda setting were measured from March 16, 2020 to June 26, 2020. <b>Results:</b> IDC VVs were at 86% in March 2020 with fluctuations until mid-May when we reached 100% and achieved sustainability. Agenda setting was reached at 100% and maintained. With continued effort, an additional 46.3% of PCF registered for the patient portal, totaling 90.6% with access. Our survey revealed 100% of PCF were able to see IDC team members that they needed to, with 87% \"extremely satisfied\" and 13% \"somewhat satisfied\" with their telehealth experience. <b>Conclusions:</b> Successful telehealth in pediatric CF IDC can be achieved through continuous communication, optimal utilization of available technologies, and may help foster unique opportunities to help improve health outcomes.</p>","PeriodicalId":22295,"journal":{"name":"Telemedicine reports","volume":" ","pages":"224-232"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2021-10-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9049801/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"40025276","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2021-10-07eCollection Date: 2021-01-01DOI: 10.1089/tmr.2021.0023
Jennifer A Andersen, Holly C Felix, Hari Eswaran, Nalin Payakachat, Don E Willis, Cari Bogulski, Pearl A McElfish
Background: Mitigation efforts to prevent the spread of COVID-19 included the robust utilization of telehealth. However, racial/ethnic minority populations have demonstrated low telehealth utilization in the past. The aim of this study was to examine the first-time use of telehealth by Marshallese adults during the COVID-19 pandemic, using online survey data collected from 109 Marshallese respondents between July and November of 2020. Methods: To evaluate the relationships between sociodemographic characteristics, health care access, physical/mental health, and COVID-19-specific measures and the decision to use telehealth, we use bivariate analyses, including t-tests and chi-square analysis. Results: Eighteen respondents (16.5%) indicated they utilized telehealth for the first time during the pandemic. The number of chronic conditions reported was positively associated with the first-time use of telehealth (p = 0.013). Although not statistically significant, a higher proportion of Marshallese first-time telehealth users reported limited English proficiency, changes in health status, and changes in health insurance. Discussion: Although telehealth has been shown to reduce the absolute gaps in health disparities for minority populations, there is limited utilization by Marshallese communities. Conclusions: Significant research remains on the utilization of telehealth by Marshallese during the COVID-19 pandemic and to increase utilization in the future.
{"title":"Factors Associated with First-Time Telehealth Utilization for Marshallese Living in the United States.","authors":"Jennifer A Andersen, Holly C Felix, Hari Eswaran, Nalin Payakachat, Don E Willis, Cari Bogulski, Pearl A McElfish","doi":"10.1089/tmr.2021.0023","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1089/tmr.2021.0023","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b><i>Background:</i></b> Mitigation efforts to prevent the spread of COVID-19 included the robust utilization of telehealth. However, racial/ethnic minority populations have demonstrated low telehealth utilization in the past. The aim of this study was to examine the first-time use of telehealth by Marshallese adults during the COVID-19 pandemic, using online survey data collected from 109 Marshallese respondents between July and November of 2020. <b><i>Methods:</i></b> To evaluate the relationships between sociodemographic characteristics, health care access, physical/mental health, and COVID-19-specific measures and the decision to use telehealth, we use bivariate analyses, including <i>t</i>-tests and chi-square analysis. <b><i>Results:</i></b> Eighteen respondents (16.5%) indicated they utilized telehealth for the first time during the pandemic. The number of chronic conditions reported was positively associated with the first-time use of telehealth (<i>p</i> = 0.013). Although not statistically significant, a higher proportion of Marshallese first-time telehealth users reported limited English proficiency, changes in health status, and changes in health insurance. <b><i>Discussion:</i></b> Although telehealth has been shown to reduce the absolute gaps in health disparities for minority populations, there is limited utilization by Marshallese communities. <b><i>Conclusions:</i></b> Significant research remains on the utilization of telehealth by Marshallese during the COVID-19 pandemic and to increase utilization in the future.</p>","PeriodicalId":22295,"journal":{"name":"Telemedicine reports","volume":" ","pages":"217-223"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2021-10-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8621619/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"39927587","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2021-10-05eCollection Date: 2021-01-01DOI: 10.1089/tmr.2021.0022
Robyn B Adams, Victoria R Nelson, Bree E Holtz
Telemedicine has garnered considerably more attention during the COVID-19 pandemic than in any time previously. However, before the beginning of the pandemic, many individuals had not accessed care in this manner. The purpose of this study was to understand the central reasons that individuals had not used telemedicine before the pandemic. Therefore, we conducted a convenience sample survey in March–April 2020, and 539 participants living in the United States answered questions about exploring their reasons for not having used telemedicine. Descriptive statistics and correlations were conducted to analyze the data. Two themes emerged from these data, including the importance of the patient–provider relationship and that access to technology was not the issue for this particular population. Although technology was not a barrier, many, specifically older participants, had concerns over privacy and security. As the world gains some control over the COVID-19 pandemic and medical appointments begin to return to a new normal, the implication for the continued use of telemedicine is still important to address as this will become a standard of care.
{"title":"Barriers for Telemedicine Use Among Nonusers at the Beginning of the Pandemic.","authors":"Robyn B Adams, Victoria R Nelson, Bree E Holtz","doi":"10.1089/tmr.2021.0022","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1089/tmr.2021.0022","url":null,"abstract":"Telemedicine has garnered considerably more attention during the COVID-19 pandemic than in any time previously. However, before the beginning of the pandemic, many individuals had not accessed care in this manner. The purpose of this study was to understand the central reasons that individuals had not used telemedicine before the pandemic. Therefore, we conducted a convenience sample survey in March–April 2020, and 539 participants living in the United States answered questions about exploring their reasons for not having used telemedicine. Descriptive statistics and correlations were conducted to analyze the data. Two themes emerged from these data, including the importance of the patient–provider relationship and that access to technology was not the issue for this particular population. Although technology was not a barrier, many, specifically older participants, had concerns over privacy and security. As the world gains some control over the COVID-19 pandemic and medical appointments begin to return to a new normal, the implication for the continued use of telemedicine is still important to address as this will become a standard of care.","PeriodicalId":22295,"journal":{"name":"Telemedicine reports","volume":" ","pages":"211-216"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2021-10-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9049802/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"40025406","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2021-08-06eCollection Date: 2021-01-01DOI: 10.1089/tmr.2021.0010
Gabrielle F Gloston, Giselle A Day, Hilary N Touchett, Kathy E Marchant-Miros, Julianna B Hogan, Patricia V Chen, Amber B Amspoker, Terri L Fletcher, Thomas P Giordano, Jan A Lindsay
Background: The rapid spread of the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic obstructed human subjects research, including our own randomized hybrid type 2 effectiveness-implementation trial comparing multidisciplinary HIV care delivered by video telehealth to home (VTH) versus in-person delivery. Methods: Given the Veteran Health Administration's extensive telehealth infrastructure and our team's expertise in personalized implementation of virtual treatments (PIVOT), we shifted our focus to meet the immediate needs of our primary study site (implementation). Our implementation team began training the interdisciplinary infectious diseases clinical team in VTH after declaration of the pandemic in March 2020. We pivoted from a randomized clinical trial recruitment and supported modifications in clinic processes by introducing patients to VTH through personalized telephone calls and mailed brochures to inform them of telehealth options during the pandemic. Adaptations were made to provider locations, with some providers delivering care remotely from home and others delivering virtual care from the clinic. We also modified the external and internal facilitator roles to allow external facilitators to provide one-on-one training, troubleshooting assistance, and delivery of necessary equipment. Results: Within 6 weeks of the emergency declaration of the pandemic, 100% of providers (n = 27) had conducted at least one appointment, with 24.1% (n = 124) of unique patients using VTH. Despite challenges, we capitalized on temporary mandates to assist providers in delivering care virtually. Given our successes, we encourage researchers to be flexible and seek alternative approaches to preserve research efforts in extenuating circumstances. RCT registration: NCT04055207 at clinicaltrials.gov.
{"title":"Pivoting to Video Telehealth for Delivery of HIV Care During COVID-19: A Brief Report.","authors":"Gabrielle F Gloston, Giselle A Day, Hilary N Touchett, Kathy E Marchant-Miros, Julianna B Hogan, Patricia V Chen, Amber B Amspoker, Terri L Fletcher, Thomas P Giordano, Jan A Lindsay","doi":"10.1089/tmr.2021.0010","DOIUrl":"10.1089/tmr.2021.0010","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Background:</b> The rapid spread of the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic obstructed human subjects research, including our own randomized hybrid type 2 effectiveness-implementation trial comparing multidisciplinary HIV care delivered by video telehealth to home (VTH) versus in-person delivery. <b>Methods:</b> Given the Veteran Health Administration's extensive telehealth infrastructure and our team's expertise in personalized implementation of virtual treatments (PIVOT), we shifted our focus to meet the immediate needs of our primary study site (implementation). Our implementation team began training the interdisciplinary infectious diseases clinical team in VTH after declaration of the pandemic in March 2020. We pivoted from a randomized clinical trial recruitment and supported modifications in clinic processes by introducing patients to VTH through personalized telephone calls and mailed brochures to inform them of telehealth options during the pandemic. Adaptations were made to provider locations, with some providers delivering care remotely from home and others delivering virtual care from the clinic. We also modified the external and internal facilitator roles to allow external facilitators to provide one-on-one training, troubleshooting assistance, and delivery of necessary equipment. <b>Results:</b> Within 6 weeks of the emergency declaration of the pandemic, 100% of providers (<i>n</i> = 27) had conducted at least one appointment, with 24.1% (<i>n</i> = 124) of unique patients using VTH. Despite challenges, we capitalized on temporary mandates to assist providers in delivering care virtually. Given our successes, we encourage researchers to be flexible and seek alternative approaches to preserve research efforts in extenuating circumstances. RCT registration: NCT04055207 at clinicaltrials.gov.</p>","PeriodicalId":22295,"journal":{"name":"Telemedicine reports","volume":" ","pages":"205-210"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2021-08-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8621621/pdf/tmr.2021.0010.pdf","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"39927586","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Background: Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) has spread rapidly worldwide. In Japan, the spread of COVID-19 was recognized and a state of emergency declared in April 2020. In response, public health interventions, such as discouraging people from leaving their homes unnecessarily, were enacted across the country. Under these circumstances, telemedicine has received a great deal of social attention, and it has become necessary to identify the perceptions of and attitudes toward telemedicine by clinicians and patients and to clarify the problems and advantages. Materials and Methods: Ten clinicians and 10 family members (if the patient was pediatric or elderly, a caregiver was included) were invited to participate in individual private interviews in 2020. All interviews were conducted from October to December 2020 using a semistructured interview guide. All transcripts were coded using thematic content analysis. Results: Four categories from clinicians and five from patients were identified as perceptions of and attitudes toward telemedicine. Both evaluated the usefulness and convenience of telemedicine in the same manner, but there was a large gap in the content under the safety and problem categories. Discussion: It is necessary to disseminate information about the communication techniques unique to telemedicine to doctors and to improve the "operation and introduction" and "communication environment and device settings" when starting or using telemedicine for all patients. Conclusions: The perceptions and attitudes identified in this study will be useful for establishing and developing a telemedicine system in Japan.
{"title":"Perceptions and Attitudes Toward Telemedicine by Clinicians and Patients in Japan During the COVID-19 Pandemic.","authors":"Rie Wakimizu, Haruo Kuroki, Katsumi Ohbayashi, Hiroki Ohashi, Kazue Yamaoka, Ai Sonoda, Shinsuke Muto","doi":"10.1089/tmr.2021.0012","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1089/tmr.2021.0012","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b><i>Background:</i></b> Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) has spread rapidly worldwide. In Japan, the spread of COVID-19 was recognized and a state of emergency declared in April 2020. In response, public health interventions, such as discouraging people from leaving their homes unnecessarily, were enacted across the country. Under these circumstances, telemedicine has received a great deal of social attention, and it has become necessary to identify the perceptions of and attitudes toward telemedicine by clinicians and patients and to clarify the problems and advantages. <b><i>Materials and Methods:</i></b> Ten clinicians and 10 family members (if the patient was pediatric or elderly, a caregiver was included) were invited to participate in individual private interviews in 2020. All interviews were conducted from October to December 2020 using a semistructured interview guide. All transcripts were coded using thematic content analysis. <b><i>Results:</i></b> Four categories from clinicians and five from patients were identified as perceptions of and attitudes toward telemedicine. Both evaluated the usefulness and convenience of telemedicine in the same manner, but there was a large gap in the content under the safety and problem categories. <b><i>Discussion:</i></b> It is necessary to disseminate information about the communication techniques unique to telemedicine to doctors and to improve the \"operation and introduction\" and \"communication environment and device settings\" when starting or using telemedicine for all patients. <b><i>Conclusions:</i></b> The perceptions and attitudes identified in this study will be useful for establishing and developing a telemedicine system in Japan.</p>","PeriodicalId":22295,"journal":{"name":"Telemedicine reports","volume":" ","pages":"197-204"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2021-07-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8812287/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"40025283","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Background: The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic and the measures to help contain it have taken a significant toll on mental health. Blended care psychotherapy combining provider-led care with digital tools can help alleviate this toll. This study describes the development of digital activities designed to teach cognitive-behavioral skills for coping with COVID-19 distress, and evaluates initial acceptability and feasibility data. Materials and Methods: Using a pragmatic retrospective cohort design, data from 664 U.S.-based individuals enrolled in blended care psychotherapy were analyzed. Descriptive analyses summarized acceptability for the digital activities. Ordinal logistic regression analyses were conducted on a subsample (n = 162) to explore the association between clients' attitudes toward the digital lesson and reported practice of skills in the exercise. Results: The majority of clients completed the assigned digital lesson and exercise. Clients reported finding the lesson valuable and relevant for coping with COVID-19 distress, and they intended to apply the skills to their lives. Higher agreement with these attitude questions was associated with a significantly greater number of skills practiced on the digital exercise. Discussion: Clients who were assigned a cognitive-behaviorally oriented digital lesson and/or exercise within a blended care model largely engaged with the materials and found them valuable. Clients with more positive attitudes about the digital lesson reported using more coping skills. Conclusions: Digital modules that teach specific skills for coping with COVID-19 can be integrated into treatment and minimize provider burden. Future study should investigate the clinical impact of these digital activities on psychiatric symptoms and personalizing the content.
{"title":"Development, Acceptability, and Feasibility of a Digital Module for Coping with COVID-19 Distress: Pragmatic Retrospective Study.","authors":"Monica S Wu, Jocelyn Lau, Chelsey Wilks, Connie Chen, Anita Lungu","doi":"10.1089/tmr.2021.0013","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1089/tmr.2021.0013","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b><i>Background:</i></b> The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic and the measures to help contain it have taken a significant toll on mental health. Blended care psychotherapy combining provider-led care with digital tools can help alleviate this toll. This study describes the development of digital activities designed to teach cognitive-behavioral skills for coping with COVID-19 distress, and evaluates initial acceptability and feasibility data. <b><i>Materials and Methods:</i></b> Using a pragmatic retrospective cohort design, data from 664 U.S.-based individuals enrolled in blended care psychotherapy were analyzed. Descriptive analyses summarized acceptability for the digital activities. Ordinal logistic regression analyses were conducted on a subsample (<i>n</i> = 162) to explore the association between clients' attitudes toward the digital lesson and reported practice of skills in the exercise. <b><i>Results:</i></b> The majority of clients completed the assigned digital lesson and exercise. Clients reported finding the lesson valuable and relevant for coping with COVID-19 distress, and they intended to apply the skills to their lives. Higher agreement with these attitude questions was associated with a significantly greater number of skills practiced on the digital exercise. <b><i>Discussion:</i></b> Clients who were assigned a cognitive-behaviorally oriented digital lesson and/or exercise within a blended care model largely engaged with the materials and found them valuable. Clients with more positive attitudes about the digital lesson reported using more coping skills. <b><i>Conclusions:</i></b> Digital modules that teach specific skills for coping with COVID-19 can be integrated into treatment and minimize provider burden. Future study should investigate the clinical impact of these digital activities on psychiatric symptoms and personalizing the content.</p>","PeriodicalId":22295,"journal":{"name":"Telemedicine reports","volume":" ","pages":"188-196"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2021-07-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8812288/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"40025277","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2021-06-14eCollection Date: 2021-01-01DOI: 10.1089/tmr.2021.0007
Ryan C Miller, Brittany A Simone, Joseph F Lombardo, James Taylor, Kamila Nowak-Choi, Kevin Ko, Linda Ferguson, Ann Donnelly, Ayesha S Ali, Wenyin Shi, Adam P Dicker, Nicole L Simone
Background: Social determinants of health directly affect cancer survival. Driven by advances in technology and recent demands due to COVID-19, telemedicine has the ability to improve patient access to care, lower health care costs, and increase workflow efficiency. The role of telemedicine in radiation oncology is not established. Materials and Methods: We conducted an IRB-approved pilot trial using a telehealth platform for the first post-radiation visit in patients with any cancer diagnosis. The primary endpoint was feasibility of using telehealth defined by completion of five telehealth visits per month in a single department. Secondary endpoints included the ability to assess patients appropriately, patient and physician satisfaction. Physicians were surveyed again during the pandemic to determine whether viewpoints changed. Results: Between May 27, 2016 and August 1, 2018, 37 patients were enrolled in the Telehealth in Post-operative Radiation Therapy (TelePORT) trial, with 24 evaluable patients who completed their scheduled telehealth visit. On average, 1.4 patients were accrued per month. All patients were satisfied with their care, had enough time with their physician and 85.7% believed the telehealth communication was excellent. All physicians were able to accurately assess the patient's symptoms via telehealth, whereas 82.3% felt they could accurately assess treatment-related toxicity. Physicians assessing skin toxicity from breast radiation were those who did not feel they were able to assess toxicity. Discussion and Conclusions: Both health care providers and patients have identified telemedicine as a suitable platform for radiation oncology visits. Although there are limitations, telemedicine has significant potential for increasing access of cancer care delivery in radiation oncology.
{"title":"A Pilot Trial Using Telemedicine in Radiation Oncology: The Future of Health Care Is Virtual.","authors":"Ryan C Miller, Brittany A Simone, Joseph F Lombardo, James Taylor, Kamila Nowak-Choi, Kevin Ko, Linda Ferguson, Ann Donnelly, Ayesha S Ali, Wenyin Shi, Adam P Dicker, Nicole L Simone","doi":"10.1089/tmr.2021.0007","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1089/tmr.2021.0007","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Background:</b> Social determinants of health directly affect cancer survival. Driven by advances in technology and recent demands due to COVID-19, telemedicine has the ability to improve patient access to care, lower health care costs, and increase workflow efficiency. The role of telemedicine in radiation oncology is not established. <b>Materials and Methods:</b> We conducted an IRB-approved pilot trial using a telehealth platform for the first post-radiation visit in patients with any cancer diagnosis. The primary endpoint was feasibility of using telehealth defined by completion of five telehealth visits per month in a single department. Secondary endpoints included the ability to assess patients appropriately, patient and physician satisfaction. Physicians were surveyed again during the pandemic to determine whether viewpoints changed. <b>Results:</b> Between May 27, 2016 and August 1, 2018, 37 patients were enrolled in the Telehealth in Post-operative Radiation Therapy (TelePORT) trial, with 24 evaluable patients who completed their scheduled telehealth visit. On average, 1.4 patients were accrued per month. All patients were satisfied with their care, had enough time with their physician and 85.7% believed the telehealth communication was excellent. All physicians were able to accurately assess the patient's symptoms via telehealth, whereas 82.3% felt they could accurately assess treatment-related toxicity. Physicians assessing skin toxicity from breast radiation were those who did not feel they were able to assess toxicity. <b>Discussion and Conclusions:</b> Both health care providers and patients have identified telemedicine as a suitable platform for radiation oncology visits. Although there are limitations, telemedicine has significant potential for increasing access of cancer care delivery in radiation oncology.</p>","PeriodicalId":22295,"journal":{"name":"Telemedicine reports","volume":" ","pages":"171-178"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2021-06-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8259074/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"39175025","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2021-06-14eCollection Date: 2021-01-01DOI: 10.1089/tmr.2021.0008
Susanne S Hoeppner, Hannah A Carlon, Christopher W Kahler, Elyse R Park, Audrey Darville, Damaris J Rohsenow, Bettina B Hoeppner
Objectives: To provide initial insight into how the COVID-19 pandemic could affect smoking behaviors and cessation efforts that were underway at its onset. Methods: An additional survey was added to follow-up assessments in an ongoing smoking cessation study for nondaily smokers: a measure of impact of COVID-19 and a subset of previously administered scales measuring smoking, emotional well-being, and alcohol use. Pre-post tests were conducted (84 ± 28 days apart). Results: Participants (81/100 of enrolled; 67% female, 75% white, 10% Hispanic, 37 ± 11 years old) reported experiencing changes regarding work (35% income reduction/loss; 35% remote work) and living situation (15% consolidated residences). Participants reported their motivation to quit smoking "slightly" increased after COVID-19 (p < 0.001), more so in those having achieved 30-day abstinence (p = 0.0045). Worry, fear, and a desire to support the greater good increased (ps < 0.05). Increases in motivation to quit correlated positively with prosocial and wellness changes. Data from pre- to post-COVID-19 onset showed decreases in emotional well-being (increased stress, negative affect, decreased coping, positive affect, all ps < 0.01), but not changes in smoking abstinence (p = 0.65), readiness to quit (p = 0.16), smoking frequency (p = 0.96), or cigarettes per day (p = 0.96). Heavy drinking decreased (p < 0.01). Trying e-cigarettes increased (p = 0.04). Conclusions: Nondaily smokers participating in a smoking cessation study during the COVID-19 pandemic reported worsened emotional well-being without effects on smoking outcomes and said their motivation to quit was slightly increased. Correlations of motivation to quit with prosocial and wellness changes suggest that targeting these constructs may be particularly helpful during a pandemic.
目的:初步了解COVID-19大流行如何影响发病时正在进行的吸烟行为和戒烟努力。方法:在一项正在进行的针对非日常吸烟者的戒烟研究的随访评估中,增加了一项额外的调查:衡量COVID-19的影响,以及先前管理的衡量吸烟、情绪健康和饮酒的量表的子集。前后试验间隔84±28天。结果:参与者(81/100);67%的女性,75%的白人,10%的西班牙裔,37±11岁)报告经历了工作方面的变化(35%的收入减少/损失;35%远程工作)和生活状况(15%合并居住)。参与者报告说,他们在COVID-19后戒烟的动机“略有”增加(p p = 0.0045)。担忧、恐惧和支持更大利益的愿望增加(ps ps p = 0.65),戒烟意愿增加(p = 0.16),吸烟频率增加(p = 0.96),或每天吸烟(p = 0.96)。重度饮酒减少(p p = 0.04)。结论:在COVID-19大流行期间参与戒烟研究的非日常吸烟者报告说,情绪健康状况恶化,但对吸烟结果没有影响,并表示他们戒烟的动机略有增加。戒烟动机与亲社会和健康变化的相关性表明,在大流行期间,针对这些结构可能特别有帮助。
{"title":"COVID-19 Impact on Smokers Participating in Smoking Cessation Trials: The Experience of Nondaily Smokers Participating in a Smartphone App Study.","authors":"Susanne S Hoeppner, Hannah A Carlon, Christopher W Kahler, Elyse R Park, Audrey Darville, Damaris J Rohsenow, Bettina B Hoeppner","doi":"10.1089/tmr.2021.0008","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1089/tmr.2021.0008","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Objectives:</b> To provide initial insight into how the COVID-19 pandemic could affect smoking behaviors and cessation efforts that were underway at its onset. <b>Methods:</b> An additional survey was added to follow-up assessments in an ongoing smoking cessation study for nondaily smokers: a measure of impact of COVID-19 and a subset of previously administered scales measuring smoking, emotional well-being, and alcohol use. Pre-post tests were conducted (84 ± 28 days apart). <b>Results:</b> Participants (81/100 of enrolled; 67% female, 75% white, 10% Hispanic, 37 ± 11 years old) reported experiencing changes regarding work (35% income reduction/loss; 35% remote work) and living situation (15% consolidated residences). Participants reported their motivation to quit smoking \"slightly\" increased after COVID-19 (<i>p</i> < 0.001), more so in those having achieved 30-day abstinence (<i>p</i> = 0.0045). Worry, fear, and a desire to support the greater good increased (<i>p</i>s < 0.05). Increases in motivation to quit correlated positively with prosocial and wellness changes. Data from pre- to post-COVID-19 onset showed decreases in emotional well-being (increased stress, negative affect, decreased coping, positive affect, all <i>p</i>s < 0.01), but not changes in smoking abstinence (<i>p</i> = 0.65), readiness to quit (<i>p</i> = 0.16), smoking frequency (<i>p</i> = 0.96), or cigarettes per day (<i>p</i> = 0.96). Heavy drinking decreased (<i>p</i> < 0.01). Trying e-cigarettes increased (<i>p</i> = 0.04). <b>Conclusions:</b> Nondaily smokers participating in a smoking cessation study during the COVID-19 pandemic reported worsened emotional well-being without effects on smoking outcomes and said their motivation to quit was slightly increased. Correlations of motivation to quit with prosocial and wellness changes suggest that targeting these constructs may be particularly helpful during a pandemic.</p>","PeriodicalId":22295,"journal":{"name":"Telemedicine reports","volume":" ","pages":"179-187"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2021-06-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8812286/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"40024816","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}