Telemedicine reports最新文献

Background: Efficacy of telemedicine for stroke was first established by the Stroke Team Remote Evaluation Using a Digital Observation Camera (STRokE DOC) trials in California and Arizona. Following these randomized controlled trials, the Stroke Telemedicine for Arizona Rural Residents (STARR) network was the first telestroke network to be established in Arizona. It consisted of a 7 spoke 1 hub telestroke system, and it was designed to serve rural, remote, or neurologically underserved communities.

Objective: The objective of STARR was to establish a multicenter state-wide telestroke research network to determine the feasibility of prospective collection, recording, and regularly analysis of telestroke patient consultations and care data for the purposes of establishing quality measures, improvement, and benchmarking against other national and international telestroke programs.

Methods: The STARR trial was open to enrollment for 29 months from 2008 to 2011. Mayo Clinic Hospital, Phoenix, Arizona served as the hub primary stroke center and its vascular neurologists provided emergency telestroke consultations to seven participating rural, remote, or underserved spoke community hospitals in Arizona. Eligibility criteria for activation of a telestroke alert and study enrollment were established. Consecutive patients exhibiting symptoms and signs of acute stroke within a 12 h window were enrolled, assessed, and treated by telemedicine. The state government sponsor, Arizona Department of Health Services' research grant covered the cost of acquisition, maintenance, and service of the selected telemedicine equipment as well as the professional telestroke services provided. The study deployed multiple telemedicine video cart systems, picture archive and communications systems software, and call management solutions. The STARR protocol was reviewed and approved by Mayo Clinic IRB, which served as the central IRB of record for all the participating hospitals, and the trial was registered at ClinicalTrials.gov.

Results: The telestroke hotline was activated 537 times, and ultimately 443 subjects met criteria and consented to participate. The STARR successfully established a multicenter state-wide telestroke research network. The STARR developed a feasible and pragmatic approach to the prospective collection, storage, and analysis of telestroke patient consultations and care data for the purposes of establishing quality measures and tracking improvement. STARR benchmarked well against other national and international telestroke programs. STARR helped set the foundation for multiple regional and state telestroke networks and ultimately evolved into a national telestroke network.

Conclusions: Multiple small and rurally located community hospitals and health systems can successfully collaborate with a more centrally located larger hospital center throug

Over the past 2 years, telemedicine has skyrocketed as COVID-19 propelled innovation and implementation at unparalleled rates. Within the UC Davis academic health system, a new paradigm for telemedicine emerged: direct-to-consumer telemedicine. The video-based telemedicine program has become the largest of its kind in California and is staffed by 80 providers (MDs, APPs) across five clinical departments/groups (primary care practice group, family and community medicine department, emergency medicine department, the nursing department, and the physical medicine and rehabilitation department). September 2021 marked the 1-year anniversary of a journey that has opened access, improved coordination, and become a workforce engine for our evolving virtual health infrastructure.

Introduction: Positive pressure ventilation (PPV) is a critical skill for neonatal resuscitation. We hypothesized that telecoaching would improve PPV performance in neonatal providers during simulated neonatal resuscitations.

Setting: Level IV neonatal intensive care unit (NICU).

Methods: This prospective crossover study included 14 experienced NICU nurses and respiratory therapists who performed PPV on a mannequin that recorded parameters of ventilation efficiency. Participants were randomized to practice independently (control) or with live feedback from a remote facilitator through audiovisual connection (intervention) and then switched to the opposite group. Participants' mask leak percentage, ventilation rates, and pressure delivery were analyzed.

Results: The primary outcome of mask leak percentage was significantly increased in the telecoaching group (19% [interquartile range {IQR} 14-59.25] vs. 100% [IQR 88-100] leak, p = 0.0001). The secondary outcome of peak inspiratory pressure (PIP) delivery was also increased (median 27.6 [IQR 23.5-34.7] vs. 23.3 [IQR 19.1-32.8] cmH₂O, p < 0.001). Differences in ventilation rates were not statistically significant (55 vs. 58 breaths/min, p = 0.51).

Conclusion: Participants demonstrated better PPV performance during telecoaching with less mask leak. The intervention group also had higher measured peak inspiratory pressures. Telecoaching may be a feasible method to provide real-time feedback to health care providers during simulated neonatal resuscitations.

Hypothesis: Neonatal providers who receive telecoaching during simulated resuscitations will perform PPV more effectively than those who do not receive telecoaching.

Background: Hospital-related coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) infection is of utmost concern among patients and health care workers. Expanding the use of telemedicine may be required in daily outpatient practice; however, the acceptance of telemedicine use is still low, especially among older patients. In an orthopedic practice, no studies have investigated potential factors that can contribute to changes in the acceptance of using telemedicine. Focusing on older outpatients with knee osteoarthritis (KOA), we hypothesized that a drastic surge in the number of patients with COVID-19 could trigger changes in attitudes regarding the acceptance of telemedicine use. Methods: A baseline survey was conducted after the first wave of the COVID-19 pandemic in Japan to obtain information on the willingness to use telemedicine among patients aged ≥70 years who regularly consulted an orthopedic surgeon for KOA. A follow-up survey was subsequently conducted during the third wave of the pandemic period to assess changes in the acceptance of telemedicine use in response to the rapidly increasing number of patients with COVID-19. We compared the difference in acceptance of telemedicine use and knee pain status between the baseline and follow-up surveys. Results: In the baseline survey, 11 of 43 patients (25.6%) responded that they would be willing to use telemedicine. In the follow-up survey, patients' acceptance of telemedicine did not change, with the exact same number and percentage of patients who were willing to use telemedicine as in the baseline survey, despite that ∼20% of patients reported improvement in their knee pain status. Discussion: Our findings indicate that older outpatients with KOA did not change their willingness to accept use of telemedicine, even with a drastically increased risk of hospital-related transmission of a potentially fatal infectious disease when visiting a hospital. The acceptance of telemedicine use among older patients might not be less sensitive to external environmental factors but instead might be more sensitive to patients' personal factors, such as anxiety for information technology and resistance to changes in their lifestyle.

Background: The COVID-19 pandemic reduced in-person visit volume and fueled a corresponding explosion in demand for telehealth services, resulting in the enactment of several temporary state and federal policies to allow greater flexibility in delivering telehealth services. This review examines patterns in telehealth utilization during the pandemic by synthesizing available findings from large-scale studies. Methods: To be included in this review, studies must be of original research, include data from 2020 or 2021, have a U.S. study population, and analyze telehealth encounter data across multiple payers and health systems. This review includes 10 studies that fully met the inclusion criteria and 29 studies that examined telehealth use during the pandemic, although not from multipayer, multihealth system data sets. All studies were identified using Ovid MEDLINE and Google Scholar. Results: At its peak, telehealth accounted for roughly 15-50% of visits across the various studied populations and data sets. The more telehealth was utilized, the smaller the decrease in overall visit volume. Audio visits tended to be used more often than video visits, and telehealth utilization varied across geographic regions and medical specialties. There were disparities in telehealth use by race, age, income, and other factors. Discussion: Most telehealth visits during the pandemic would not have been reimbursable without the telehealth policy changes that took place. The variability in telehealth utilization across geographic regions is likely attributed to state-level telehealth policies. Most studies examining disparities in telehealth utilization did not compare disparities from before and during the pandemic, and these disparities may be a characteristic of health care overall rather than of telehealth specifically.

Summary: More than a third of the global burden of blindness is due to cataracts, yet cataract surgery is one of the most cost-effective surgical treatments in medicine. Poor surgical outcomes in many settings remain a major challenge, raising concerns about the quality and efficacy of surgical training. Reflective learning from video recordings of a trainees' surgical performance has a high educational impact and is available routinely for surgical training within high-resource institutions. However, the prohibitive cost and limited portability of current surgical video recording systems make its use problematic in low-resource settings and outreach environments.

Objective: The study's aim was to evaluate the potential of smartphone-captured surgical videos for surgeon learning via self-recording and self-review as well as the potential to support live telesurgical consultation.

Methodology: A quantitative and qualitative methodology was used to explore and describe the utility and acceptance of smartphone videos in two training facilities in Nepal. Twenty surgeries were recorded on the smartphone for surgeon self-review, to assess image quality, and its application to measure performance against the International Council of Ophthalmology (ICO) Ophthalmology Surgical Competency Assessment Rubrics (OSCAR) SICS Rubric. The same system was used to transmit 15 different surgeries live via Skype from Nepal to an ophthalmologist surgical trainer in South Africa to evaluate the feasibility of live consultation.

Findings: Overall video quality was described as high in 65% and moderate in 35% for the videos recorded for self-review. In the surgeries streamed via Skype, quality was described as high in 92.9% and moderate in 7.1%. There were no instances where the video quality was described as poor. The video quality was good enough that the surgeons could measure against ICO-OSCAR rubric in all cases.

Discussion: The video quality of smartphone-captured surgical videos was found to be high and gained acceptance for reflective teaching and learning purposes. The extended telesurgical potential and portability of the smartphone enables use across many settings. More studies over a longer period are needed to determine how they can support training and learning in cataract surgery.

Background: Mental health (MH) and substance use disorders (SUDs) are common during pregnancy and the postpartum year, and have a significant impact on maternal and child health. Most women do not receive treatment for these conditions due to barriers to care. Increasing access to these services via telemedicine is one potential solution to overcoming barriers, but it is unknown if this type of service is acceptable to women. The purpose of this study is to evaluate patient satisfaction with, and accessibility to, a maternal MH and SUD telemedicine service delivered to obstetric practices. Methods: The Telemedicine Satisfaction Questionnaire and the Questionnaire for Assessing Patient Satisfaction with Video Consultation were collected via online surveys. Responses were scored on a 5-point Likert scale, ranging from strongly disagree (1) to strongly agree (5). Paired t-tests were used to compare round trip travel time and distance between participants home and specialty clinic at an academic medical center versus their local obstetrics clinic where they received telemedicine services. Results: A total of 91.42% (32/35) of women agreed to take part in the study, and 43.75% (14/32) of women were living in a rural community. Patients reported high levels of satisfaction with the following: overall quality of care (mean [M] 4.66 [standard deviation, SD, 0.67]); similarity to face-to-face are (M 4.69 [SD 0.63]); and access to care (M 4.47 [SD 0.81]). Compared with in-person care at an academic medical center, women receiving care via telemedicine spent significantly less time (67.44 minutes vs. 256.31 minutes, p < 0.001) and distance (50.33 miles vs. 236.06 miles, p < 0.001) traveling round trip. Conclusions: Women receiving MH and SUD treatment via telemedicine within their obstetrician's office report high levels of satisfaction and increased access to care with this modality of treatment delivery. Telemedicine may provide one solution to removing barriers to care and mitigating the maternal and child risks associated with of untreated MH and SUDs.

Background: COVID-19 caused a dramatic increase in the scope and utilization of telemedicine. However, the sustainability of the permanent integration of telemedicine in the management of chronic disease beyond the pandemic is still enigmatic. The purpose of this retrospective chart review was to analyze the effect of advanced training in telemedicine on clinical outcomes in type II diabetes mellitus (T2DM) in the United States. Methods: A retrospective chart review was conducted in 104 deidentified patients with diabetes from 28 specialized telemedicine agency physicians who had received specialized telemedicine training. After establishing exclusion criteria, the charts of 59 T2DM patients were evaluated. Glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c) percentage and body mass index (BMI) were used as quantitative endpoints. Visit consistency, mediation data, and compliance data were also studied. Results: The mean change in HbA1c for the 42 patients who met the inclusion criteria for evaluating HbA1c (n = 42) was -0.429%. The largest decrease in HbA1c was 5.4%, and the most significant increase was 3.9%. The mean change in BMI for the 16 patients who met the inclusion criteria for evaluating BMI (n = 16) was -2.175 kg/m². The largest decrease in BMI was 9.5 kg/m² and the largest increase was +0.7 kg/m². The average number of visits for patients with a decrease in HbA1c was 3.45. The average number of visits for patients with an increase in HbA1c was 2.62. Conclusions: Outcomes of telemedicine providers with training are comparable with the standard of care. Advanced telemedicine training and its effect on clinical outcomes in the management of chronic disease warrant further investigation. For telemedicine to become a mainstay in U.S. medicine, a standard of best practices should be evaluated and available for providers who wish to continue telehealth care delivery.

Background: Many health systems transitioned rapidly to using inpatient and outpatient telemedicine during the COVID-19 pandemic. Prior research has examined clinician satisfaction and experiences with telemedicine in a siloed approach for specific provider types. Less is known about how experiences with the rapid transition to telemedicine affected the entire clinical team, and how this contributed to their overall distress. Methods: A survey was conducted within a large academic medical center in the Southeastern United States during June of 2020. The survey asked about experiences with inpatient and outpatient telemedicine and overall distress. Analysis of variance was calculated to examine differences in experiences among physicians, nurses, and advanced practice providers (APPs) with both inpatient and outpatient telemedicine. Multivariate regression analysis was conducted to determine whether reported telemedicine stressors were associated with changes in overall distress scores. Qualitative comments provided during the survey were included to illustrate the quantitative findings. Results: Of the 1130 survey respondents, 237 indicated that they used telemedicine. Telemedicine use was not statistically significantly associated with overall distress scores. The APPs indicated the greatest satisfaction with telemedicine, followed by physicians and then nurses. Team members differed on their perceptions of quality of care and safety for inpatient and outpatient telemedicine. Physicians (70%) and APPs (64%) felt safer having the option to use inpatient telemedicine, whereas only 26% of nurses reported the same. Overall, >70% of physicians and APPs would like to continue having the option to use inpatient and outpatient telemedicine in the future, whereas <50% of nurses reported the same. Discussion: These results suggest that telemedicine holds promise for providing care beyond the pandemic, and it may be a mechanism to improve flexibility, autonomy, and expand patient access. Implementation of new technologies must consider the experiences of the entire team, rather than a siloed approach to determining satisfaction with the changes.

Purpose/Objectives: Medical documentation has become increasingly challenging for providers, particularly with changes to telemedicine visit formats during the ongoing COVID-19 pandemic. Medical scribes may help mitigate this burden. Our objective was to determine how scribes affect provider efficiency during the COVID-19 pandemic. Materials/Methods: Providers completed a survey in February 2020 (S1, prepandemic) and 1 year into the COVID-19 pandemic in February 2021 (S2, during pandemic). S1 evaluated perceived impact of scribes on clerical work, medical documentation, and efficiency during office visits using the Likert scale. S2 also addressed scribe use during telemedicine visits. Provider time spent on documentation with or without a scribe was evaluated using a five-level ordinal scale. Provider response was assessed using descriptive frequency statistics. Fisher's exact test was used to compare categorical variables. Analysis was performed using SAS version 9.4 (SAS Institute, Inc., Cary, NC). All tests were two sided with an alpha level of 0.05. Results: Fifty-eight providers responded to the surveys: 36 (62%) for S1 and 22 (38%) for S2. Scribe use decreased perceived clerical work and facilitated chart review, and recording of physical examination findings, note documentation, and improved efficiency, both before and during the pandemic (p = 0.5, p = 0.7, p = 0.8, p = 0.8, p = 0.9, respectively). Scribe use significantly decreased time to complete documentation prepandemic (p = 0.002) and during the pandemic for both in-person (p ≤ 0.0001) and telemedicine visits (p = 0.0004). More providers took >60 min to complete medical documentation without the use of a scribe prepandemic (72% vs. 30% with a scribe, p = 0.006) and during the pandemic, after both in-person (40% vs. 0% with a scribe, p = 0.002) and telemedicine visits (35% vs. 0% with a scribe, p = 0.002). Conclusions: Scribe use decreases provider time spent on medical documentation and improves overall efficiency before and during the COVID-19 pandemic for both in-person and telemedicine visits. Integration of scribes into radiation oncology in-person and telemedicine clinics may improve provider satisfaction by reducing burden of documentation.