Telemedicine reports最新文献

This study examined whether gait data could be reliably collected by homebound participants using iPhones under online supervision. Eighteen healthy young adults met with investigators through Zoom and installed an app to record acceleration from their iPhones' accelerometers. Half of the subjects walked normally; the other half walked while spelling words backward. During the gait tasks subjects recorded their anterior-posterior (AP), medial-lateral (ML), and vertical (V) accelerations. Data collection was repeated the following week. Seven maximum and minimum peak accelerations in the AP, ML, and vertical directions associated with events in gait were determined. Significant main effects of week and direction were observed for the first and second vertical acceleration measures. Cronbach alpha values were >0.60 for all acceleration measures, but the maximum and minimum AP accelerations that showed fair to good levels of consistency. The findings suggest gait data collected inside the home setting may be of clinical use.

Background: People with HIV in the United States are aging, with risk for negative health outcomes from social isolation. PositiveLinks is a mobile health (mHealth) intervention that includes an anonymous Community Message Board (CMB) for peer-to-peer conversations. We investigated differences in CMB usage and social support between younger (<50 years) and older (≥50) members.

Methods: We assessed the relationship between age groups and app use using chi-square tests. CMB posts were analyzed qualitatively to categorize forms of social support. To have a visual understanding of this relationship, we created a network diagram to display interactions among PL members.

Results: Among 87 participants, 31 (42.5%) were in the older age group. Older members launched the app more often at 6 months (445.5 vs. 240.5 mean launches per participant, p ≤ 0.001) and 12 months (712.3 vs. 292.6 launches, p ≤ 0.001) compared with younger members. Older members also demonstrated more CMB posts at 6 months (47.4 vs. 7.6 mean posts per participant, p = 0.02) and 12 months (77.5 vs. 10.6 posts, p = 0.04). Of 1861 CMB posts, 7% sought support and 72% provided support. In addition, the network visualization showed that four participants, who were in the older age group, had more post generation than others and most of their posts provided support.

Conclusions: Older PL members demonstrated significantly more app use than younger members, including CMB posts for social support. This durable app engagement indicates that mHealth can enable social connection among people living with chronic disease across the lifespan.

Background: Telecritical care (TCC) as a telehealth modality seeks to remedy contemporary shortfalls in staffing and experience at the bedside. Physician and physician trainee perceptions of TCC practice and education can help inform programmatic and curricular decisions. The perceptions of TCC and a formalized structured TCC rotation from faculty and trainees are unknown.

Objective: To evaluate perceptions of TCC practice and education among participating physicians and trainees.

Methods: Survey of physicians and trainees participating in the Emory Critical Care Center's TCC unit from 2017 to 2021 was conducted, after implementation of a structured TCC educational curriculum. Items were developed with a 5-point Likert scale.

Results: The overall response rate was 71% (43 of 61). Most respondents felt their knowledge was used appropriately and that their recommendations were well received at the bedside. The majority perceived that the TCC program improved continuity, quality, and safety of patient care. More than half of respondents would practice TCC in the future, and most would advocate for it. Most fellows were comfortable providing patient care remotely after their rotation. The majority of respondents felt TCC did not add to their level of burnout.

Conclusions: This programmatic evaluation identified perceived improvements in patient care. Implementation of a TCC rotation does not seem to negatively impact the educational experience of trainees.

Background: A small fraction of individuals in need of treatment for alcohol use disorders (AUDs) seek care, owing largely to barriers to accessing treatment. In the present pilot study, we examine the feasibility, acceptability, and preliminary outcomes of an m-health intervention combining cognitive behavioral therapy and pharmacotherapy for individuals with AUD.

Methods: Adults with AUD (N = 26) recruited through online, social media-based advertising were enrolled in a 12-week, integrated telemedicine intervention combining psychosocial treatment with medical management: Quit Genius for AUD (QG-A). Feasibility, acceptability, perceived helpfulness, treatment engagement, retention, completion, and clinical outcomes including alcohol use and secondary mental health outcomes were assessed.

Results: Participants found the QG-A intervention to be acceptable and helpful in facilitating action toward their therapeutic goals concerning alcohol use. Treatment completion, achieved by the majority (85%) of participants, was excellent. On average, participants reduced their past 30-day alcohol use from baseline (mean proportion of days of abstinent = 0.13) to follow-up (M = 0.59), t(19) = -4.97, p < 0.001, and consumed fewer drinks per drinking day from baseline (M = 6.7) to follow-up (M = 2.0), t(19) = 3.61, p < 0.001. Concurrently, reductions were observed in depressive (t[22] = 5.39, p < 0.001) and anxiety (t[22] = 2.87, p < 0.01) symptom severity, from the moderately severe range at baseline to the mild range at treatment-end, with increases in resilience (t[22] = -3.54, p < 0.001).

Conclusions: Addressing AUDs using an integrated m-health intervention to deliver evidence-based psychosocial and pharmacological treatment is feasible and may produce improvements in both alcohol use and psychiatric symptoms.

The COVID-19 pandemic led to rapid expansion of telemedicine services. We surveyed parent/guardians from March 10 to June 29, 2020, in an academic and community pediatric practice, and community pediatric providers from June 5 to July 13, 2020, to better understand their perceptions of telemedicine and compare parent/guardian satisfaction between in-person and telemedicine encounters. Overall patient satisfaction scores were high in both settings and did not differ between in-person and telemedicine visits (community setting: 93.36 ± 12.87 in-person vs. 88.04 ± 22.04 telemedicine; academic setting: 92.25 ± 11.2 vs. 95.37 ± 8.21). Most providers (82.5%) would be willing to use telemedicine in a nonpandemic situation. Telemedicine should remain available for primary care pediatrics during and after resolution of the pandemic.

Background: Different approaches of evaluation by cardiologists using telemedicine have the potential of improving care of patients with ST elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI). Objective: To compare the use of pharmacoinvasive strategy and associated clinical outcomes (heart failure [HF] and mortality) among patients with STEMI before and after a program of telemedicine and also according to the level of support by telemedicine. Methods: A chest pain network with the support of a cardiologist through telemedicine was implemented in 2012 in 22 emergency departments without a local cardiac catheterization laboratory. Initially (phase 1 of telemedicine), the decision to discuss the case with the cardiologist was based on the judgment of the emergency physician. At the end of 2018, the use of telemedicine was modified and a dedicated cardiologist was available continuously to discuss systematically all suspected cases (phase 2 of telemedicine). The use of fibrinolytics and the rates of HF and in-hospital mortality were compared among three different periods: pretelemedicine (2011), and phase 1 and phase 2 of the telemedicine program. Results: We evaluated 1034 STEMI patients and after comparing the three phases, we did not find significant differences regarding age, gender, and comorbidities. The use of fibrinolytics before transferring STEMI patients to a percutaneous coronary intervention center (pharmacoinvasive strategy) increased after telemedicine implementation (38% vs. 65.2%; p < 0.01), which was associated with a lower rate of HF (23.9% vs. 14.4%; p = 0.01) and death (7.9% vs. 4.0%; p = 0.05). The in-hospital mortality was lower in phase 2 with systematic evaluation by telemedicine compared with pretelemedicine (7.9% vs. 3.3%; p = 0.04). Conclusion: The implementation of a systematic and organized chest pain protocol, including telemedicine support, was associated with a significant increase in the use of pharmacoinvasive strategy and better clinical patient outcomes in patients with STEMI. Our findings provide important insights on how to improve the management of this high-risk population, reducing the gap between evidence and clinical practice.

Background: The objective of this study is to evaluate a rapid assessment telemedicine system in the emergency department for safety, workflow disruption, and satisfaction level by clinicians, staff, and patients. Methods: After consent is obtained, the patient and telemedicine emergency physician are connected on a Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act-compliant video conference for a rapid assessment, including history of present illness, review of systems, and past medical history. The telemedicine physician initiates orders based on these data. Patient data collected include age, gender, chief complaint, Emergency Severity Index, door to telemedicine physician time, door to in-person physician time, length of stay, left without being seen (LWBS) status, and satisfaction scores. Nurses were assessed for workflow interruptions and communication gaps. In-person physicians were assessed regarding perceived missed information in patient management, perceived workflow interruptions, and satisfaction. Results: Convenience sampling when participating physicians were on-shift resulted in 22 patients enrolled out of 25 approached over 2 months. No patients LWBS, and no in-person physicians perceived missed information in management. Satisfaction was well scored in all evaluated parties, with no score below a 4.77 out of 5 for any of the categories evaluated. Only one case interrupted the workflow of the on-site physician. Discussion: Telemedicine rapid assessment was found to be safe, efficient, and associated with high satisfaction. These results warrant study on a larger scale with a control group to statistically assess differences in outcome metrics such as LWBS rates. If effective, this approach could provide a novel and flexible physician-staffing tool.

Background: Older adults may experience a significant digital divide and need support with using technology to transition to telehealth. This study examines the role of social support for telehealth utilization among older adults during the COVID-19 pandemic. Materials and Methods: We used data from the COVID-19 Sample Person Interview to the National Health and Aging Trends Study. Using logistic regression, we measured the association between telehealth utilization and social support. Results: Nearly one in five respondents used telehealth during the COVID-19 pandemic (weighted %: 20.6 [585/3188]). Currently living with family or friends and receipt of technical support were associated with telehealth utilization. Among residents of an assisted living facility, those who received communications technology support from the facility were more likely to use telehealth. Conclusion: Health care providers and policies should aim to reduce barriers to telehealth among older adults, with efforts such as digital literacy support and training.

Background: Cervical cancer, a preventable cancer of disparities, is the primary cause of cancer death for women in Nicaragua. Clinics and personnel in rural and remote Nicaragua may not be accessible to perform recommended screening or follow-up services. Objective: To assess acceptability and feasibility of integrating innovations for high-quality screening and treatment follow-up (tele-colposcopy) into existing pathways on Nicaragua's Caribbean Coast within the context of the National Cervical Cancer Control Program. Methods: Provider focus groups, key informant interviews, and environmental scans were conducted for 13 clinics on the Caribbean Coast of Nicaragua. Topics discussed included a smartphone-based mobile colposcope (MobileODT hardware and mobile platform), mobile connectivity capacity, clinic resources, provider acceptability, and current diagnostic and clinical protocols. We tested device connectivity through image upload availability and real-time video connection and simulated clinical encounters utilizing MobileODT and a low-cost cervical simulator. We developed a database of colposcopic images to establish feasibility of integrating this database and clinical characteristics into the cervical cancer registry. Results: Provider acceptability of integrating tele-colposcopy into existing cancer control efforts was high. Image upload connectivity varied by location (mean = 1 h 9 min). Most clinics had running water (84.6%) and consistent electricity (92.3%), but some did not have access to landline telephones (53.8%). Conclusions: As faster connectivity becomes available in remote settings, Mobile Health tools such as tele-colposcopy will be increasingly feasible to provide access to high-quality cervical cancer follow-up. World Health Organization guidance on integrating technology into existing programs will remain important to ensure programmatic efficacy, local relevance, and sustainability.

Background: Since the explosion of telemedicine resulting from the SARS-CoV2 pandemic, employers have been particularly interested in virtual primary care as a novel means of expanding primary care services. The purpose of this study is to describe a model of integrated care delivered both in-person and virtually at employer-sponsored health centers nationwide. The key outcomes of this analysis were the proportion of all care delivered in-person and virtually by clinical discipline, the types of care and member satisfaction for care delivered in-person and virtually, and a description of the use of multiple clinical disciplines by the employee population. Methods: Retrospective observational study comparing health services utilization of primary care, behavioral health, and physical medicine services both in-person and virtually in employer-sponsored clinics between January 1, 2020 and June 30, 2021. Results: Of the 331,967 visits with employer-sponsored health center staff, 63% were in-person and 37% were delivered virtually. Most visits were for primary care services (59.5%), with physical medicine visits and behavioral health visits accounting for 25.1% and 15.4%, respectively. Whereas the preponderance of behavioral health visits were virtual visits (72.5%), less than a quarter (18.2%) of physical medicine visits were delivered virtually. 19.6% of patients were seen by more than two clinical disciplines and 2.6% were seen by three different disciplines. Overall, patients were highly likely to recommend the health center across both modalities (Net Promoter Score 89.1 for in-person care and 88.4 for virtual care). Discussion: The future of employer-sponsored integrated team-based care may require a hybrid approach that can lean heavily on virtual visits but requires the infrastructure necessary for in-person care.