The Journal of Nuclear Medicine最新文献

The diagnostic work-up of patients with fever of unknown origin (FUO) begins with a thorough history and physical examination, complete blood count with differential, chest x-ray, urinalysis and culture, electrolyte panel, liver enzymes, erythrocyte sedimentation rate, and C-reactive protein level. Additional imaging procedures, including nuclear medicine tests, are generally used as second-line procedures, with ¹⁸F-FDG PET and PET/CT assuming increasingly important roles in the diagnostic work-up. The Society of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging, the Infectious Diseases Society of America, and the American College of Nuclear Medicine convened an autonomous expert work group to comprehensively review the published literature for nuclear imaging in adults and children with FUO and establish appropriate use criteria (AUC). This process was performed in accordance with the Protecting Access to Medicare Act of 2014, which requires that all referring physicians consult AUC by using a clinical decision support mechanism before ordering advanced diagnostic imaging services. The complete findings and discussions of the work group were published on January 8, 2023, and are available at https://www.snmmi.org/ClinicalPractice/content.aspx?ItemNumber=15666. The AUC in the final document are intended to assist referring health care providers in appropriate use of nuclear medicine imaging procedures in patients with FUO. The work group noted limitations in the current literature on nuclear medicine imaging for FUO, with the need for well-designed prospective multicenter investigations. Consensus findings from published data and expert opinions were used to create recommendations in common clinical scenarios for adults and children. Included in the complete document is a discussion of inflammation of unknown origin (IUO), a recently described entity. In view of the fact that the criteria for FUO and IUO are similar (except for fever > 38.3°C [100.9°F]) and that the most common etiologies of these 2 entities are similar, it is the expert opinion of the work group that the recommendations for nuclear medicine imaging of FUO are also applicable to IUO. These recommendations are included in the full guidance document. This summary reviews rationale, methodology, and main findings and refers the reader to the complete AUC document.

The phase 3 VISION trial demonstrated that [¹⁷⁷Lu]Lu-PSMA-617 prolonged progression-free survival and overall survival (OS) in prostate-specific membrane antigen [PSMA]–positive metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) patients who progressed on taxane-based chemotherapy and androgen receptor–signaling inhibitors (ARSIs). The U.S. expanded-access program (EAP; NCT04825652) was opened to provide access to [¹⁷⁷Lu]Lu-PSMA-617 for eligible patients until regulatory approval was obtained. This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety profile of [¹⁷⁷Lu]Lu-PSMA-617 within the EAP and compare the results with those from the VISION trial. Methods: Patients enrolled in the EAP at 4 institutions in the United States with available toxicity and outcome data were included. Outcome measures included OS, a prostate-specific antigen (PSA) response rate (RR) of at least 50%, and incidences of toxicity according to Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events version 5.0. Differences in baseline characteristics, outcome data, and toxicity between the EAP and VISION were evaluated using t testing of proportions and survival analyses. Results: In total, 117 patients with mCRPC who received [¹⁷⁷Lu]Lu-PSMA-617 within the EAP between May 2021 and March 2022 were eligible and included in this analysis. Patients enrolled in the EAP were more heavily pretreated with ARSI (≥2 ARSI regimens: 70% vs. 46%; P < 0.001) and had worse performance status at baseline (Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group score ≥ 2: 19% vs. 7%; P < 0.001) than VISION patients. EAP and VISION patients had similar levels of grade 3 or higher anemia (18% vs. 13%; P = 0.15), thrombocytopenia (13% vs. 8%; P = 0.13), and neutropenia (3% vs. 3%; P = 0.85) and similar PSA RRs (42% vs. 46%; P = 0.50) and OS (median: 15.1 vs. 15.3 mo; P > 0.05). Conclusion: Patients with PSMA-positive mCRPC who received [¹⁷⁷Lu]Lu-PSMA-617 within the EAP were later in their disease trajectory than VISION patients. Patients enrolled in the EAP achieved similar PSA RRs and OS and had a safety profile similar to that of the VISION trial patients.

In Canada and across the globe, access to PSMA PET/CT is limited and expensive. For patients with biochemical recurrence (BCR) after treatment for prostate cancer, novel strategies are needed to better stratify patients who may or may not benefit from a PSMA PET scan. The role of the free-to-total prostate-specific antigen (PSA) ratio (FPSAR) in posttreatment prostate cancer, specifically in the PSMA PET/CT era, remains unknown. Our aim in this study was to determine the association of FPSAR in patients referred for ¹⁸F-DCFPyL PSMA PET/CT in the BCR setting and assess the correlation between FPSAR and ¹⁸F-DCFPyL PSMA PET/CT positivity (local recurrence or distant metastases). Methods: This prospective study included 137 patients who were referred for ¹⁸F-DCFPyL PSMA PET/CT and had BCR with a total PSA of less than 1 ng/mL after radical prostatectomy (RP) (including adjuvant or salvage radiotherapy). Blood samples were collected on the day of ¹⁸F-DCFPyL PSMA PET/CT. FPSAR was categorized as less than 0.10 or as 0.10 or more. A positive ¹⁸F-DCFPyL PSMA PET/CT scan was defined by a PROMISE classification lesion score of 2 or 3, irrespective of the site of increased tracer uptake (e.g., prostate, pelvic nodes, bone, or viscera). Results: Overall, 137 blood samples of patients with BCR after RP were analyzed to calculate FPSAR. The median age at ¹⁸F-DCFPyL PSMA PET/CT was 68.6 y (interquartile range, 63.0–72.4 y), and the median PSA at ¹⁸F-DCFPyL PSMA PET/CT was 0.3 ng/mL (interquartile range, 0.3–0.6 ng/mL). Eighty-six patients (62.8%) had an FPSAR of less than 0.10, whereas 51 patients (37.2%) had an FPSAR of 10 or more. An FPSAR of 10 or more was identified as an independent predictor of a positive ¹⁸F-DCFPyL PSMA PET/CT scan, with an odds ratio of 6.99 (95% CI, 2.96–16.51; P < 0.001). Conclusion: An FPSAR of 10 or more after RP independently correlated with increased odds of a positive ¹⁸F-DCFPyL PSMA PET/CT scan among BCR post-RP patients. These findings may offer an inexpensive method by which to triage access to ¹⁸F-DCFPyL PSMA PET/CT in jurisdictions where availability is not replete.

Prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA)–targeted radioguided surgery (RGS) is evolving as a new treatment modality for patients with early biochemical recurrence of prostate cancer and disease limited to locoregional lymph nodes on PSMA-ligand PET/CT. Nevertheless, the pattern of failure (locoregional vs. systemic) after PSMA RGS remains unknown. Therefore, the aim of this retrospective analysis was to evaluate the pattern of disease using PSMA-ligand PET in patients experiencing relapse after PSMA RGS. Methods: We evaluated 100 patients with biochemical recurrence after previous PET-guided PSMA RGS who underwent PSMA-ligand PET (median prostate-specific antigen [PSA], 0.9 ng/mL; range, 0.2–14.2 ng/mL). All suspicious lesions for recurrent prostate cancer were grouped according to the molecular imaging TNM classification system. Detection rates and lesion localization were determined and stratified by PSA values and the International Society of Urological Pathology grade group. Further, lesion localization was compared before and after PSMA RGS. Results: The median time between PSMA RGS and PSMA-ligand PET for relapse was 11.4 mo (range, 5.5–25.6 mo). In total, 91 of 100 (91%) patients showed PSMA-ligand–positive findings. PSMA PET detection rates were 82.6%, 92.6%, 91.3%, and 96.3% for PSA levels of 0.2–0.49, 0.5–0.99, 1–1.99, and at least 2 ng/mL, respectively. More than half of the patients (53%; 48/91) showed local recurrence or pelvic lymph node metastases only. Extrapelvic lymph node metastases, bone metastases, and visceral metastases were present in 22% (20/91), 16% (15/91), and 9% (8/91) of the patients, respectively. With increasing International Society of Urological Pathology grade group, the percentage of patients with bone and visceral metastases increased, whereas the number of patients with only locoregional disease decreased. Conclusion: PSMA-ligand PET is a useful method to detect and localize recurrent disease in patients with biochemical failure after PSMA RGS, with more than half of the patients presenting with locoregional recurrence, offering the potential for a second local therapy (e.g., radiation therapy or repeated surgery).

Chronic hypertension leads to injury and fibrosis in major organs. Fibroblast activation protein (FAP) is one of key molecules in tissue fibrosis, and ⁶⁸Ga-labeled FAP inhibitor-46 (FAPI46) PET is a recently developed method for evaluating FAP. The aim of this study was to evaluate FAP expression and fibrosis in a hypertension model and to test the feasibility of ⁶⁸Ga-FAPI46 PET in hypertension. Methods: Hypertension was induced in mice by angiotensin II infusion for 4 wk. ⁶⁸Ga-FAPI46 biodistribution studies and PET scanning were conducted at 1, 2, and 4 wk after hypertension modeling, and uptake in the major organs was measured. The FAP expression and fibrosis formation of the heart and kidney tissues were analyzed and compared with ⁶⁸Ga-FAPI46 uptake. Subgroups of the hypertension model underwent angiotensin receptor blocker administration and high-dose FAPI46 blocking, for comparison. As a preliminary human study, ⁶⁸Ga-FAPI46 PET images of lung cancer patients were analyzed and compared between hypertension and control groups. Results: Uptake of ⁶⁸Ga-FAPI46 in the heart and kidneys was significantly higher in the hypertension group than in the sham group as early as week 1 and decreased after week 2. The uptake was specifically blocked in the high-dose blocking study. Immunohistochemistry also revealed FAP expression in both heart and kidney tissues. However, overt fibrosis was observed in the heart, whereas it was absent from the kidneys. The angiotensin receptor blocker–treated group showed lower uptake in the heart and kidneys than did the hypertension group. In the pilot human study, renal uptake of ⁶⁸Ga-FAPI46 significantly differed between the hypertension and control groups. Conclusion: In hypertension, FAP expression is increased in the heart and kidneys from the early phases and decreases over time. FAP expression appears to represent fibrosis activity preceding or underlying fibrotic tissue formation. ⁶⁸Ga-FAPI46 PET has potential as an effective imaging method for evaluating FAP expression in progressive fibrosis by hypertension.

In nuclear medicine, estimating the number of radioactive decays that occur in a source organ per unit administered activity of a radiopharmaceutical (i.e., the time-integrated activity coefficient [TIAC]) is an essential task within the internal dosimetry workflow. TIAC estimation is commonly derived by least-squares fitting of various exponential models to organ time–activity data (radiopharmaceutical biodistribution). Rarely, however, are methods used to objectively determine the model that best characterizes the data. Additionally, the uncertainty associated with the resultant TIAC is generally not evaluated. As part of the MIRDsoft initiative, MIRDfit has been developed to offer a biodistribution fitting software solution that provides the following essential features and advantages for internal dose assessment: nuclear medicine–appropriate fit functions; objective metrics for guiding best-fit selection; TIAC uncertainty calculation; quality control and data archiving; integration with MIRDcalc software for dose calculation; and a user-friendly Excel-based interface. For demonstration and comparative validation of MIRDfit’s performance, TIACs were derived from serial imaging studies involving ¹⁸F-FDG and ¹⁷⁷Lu-DOTATATE using MIRDfit. These TIACs were then compared with TIAC estimates obtained using other software. In most cases, the TIACs agreed within approximately 10% between MIRDfit and the other software. MIRDfit has been endorsed by the MIRD Committee of the Society of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging and has been integrated into the MIRDsoft suite of free dosimetry software; it is available for download at no user cost (https://mirdsoft.org/).

This single-center, single-arm, phase II trial (ChiCTR2100050057) investigated the ability of ¹⁸F-labeled fibroblast activation protein inhibitor ([¹⁸F]AlF-NOTA-FAPI-04, denoted as ¹⁸F-FAPI) PET/CT to predict the response to neoadjuvant camrelizumab plus chemotherapy (nCC) in locally advanced esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (LA-ESCC). Methods: This study included 32 newly diagnosed LA-ESCC participants who underwent ¹⁸F-FAPI PET/CT at baseline, of whom 23 also underwent scanning after 2 cycles of nCC. The participants underwent surgery after 2 cycles of nCC. Recorded PET parameters included maximum, peak, and mean SUVs and tumor-to-background ratios (TBRs), metabolic tumor volume, and total lesion FAP expression. PET parameters were compared between patient groups with good and poor pathologic responses, and the predictive performance for treatment response was analyzed. Results: The good and poor response groups each included 16 participants (16/32, 50.0%). On ¹⁸F-FAPI PET/CT, the posttreatment SUVs were significantly lower in good responders than in poor responders, whereas the changes in SUVs with treatment were significantly higher (all P < 0.05). SUV_max (area under the curve [AUC], 0.87; P = 0.0026), SUV_peak (AUC, 0.89; P = 0.0017), SUV_mean (AUC, 0.88; P = 0.0021), TBR_max (AUC, 0.86; P = 0.0031), and TBR_mean (AUC, 0.88; P = 0.0021) after nCC were significant predictors of pathologic response to nCC, with sensitivities of 63.64%–81.82% and specificities of 83.33%–100%. Changes in SUV_max (AUC, 0.81; P = 0.0116), SUV_peak (AUC, 0.82; P = 0.0097), SUV_mean (AUC, 0.81; P = 0.0116), and TBR_mean (AUC, 0.74; P = 0.0489) also were significant predictors of the pathologic response to nCC, with sensitivities and specificities in similar ranges. Conclusion: ¹⁸F-FAPI PET/CT parameters after treatment and their changes from baseline can predict the pathologic response to nCC in LA-ESCC participants.

[¹⁷⁷Lu]Lu-PSMA-617 was approved by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration for patients with prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA)–positive metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC). Since the time of regulatory approval, however, real-world data have been lacking. This study investigated the efficacy, safety, and outcome predictors of [¹⁷⁷Lu]Lu-PSMA-617 at a major U.S. academic center. Methods: Patients with mCRPC who received [¹⁷⁷Lu]Lu-PSMA-617 at the Johns Hopkins Hospital outside clinical trials were screened for inclusion. Patients who underwent [¹⁷⁷Lu]Lu-PSMA-617 and had available outcome data were included in this study. Outcome data included prostate-specific antigen (PSA) response (≥50% decline), PSA progression-free survival (PFS), and overall survival (OS). Toxicity data were evaluated according to the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events version 5.03. The study tested the association of baseline circulating tumor DNA mutational status in homologous recombination repair, PI3K alteration pathway, and aggressive-variant prostate cancer–associated genes with treatment outcome. Baseline PSMA PET/CT images were analyzed using SelectPSMA, an artificial intelligence algorithm, to predict treatment outcome. Associations with the observed treatment outcome were evaluated. Results: All 76 patients with PSMA-positive mCRPC who received [¹⁷⁷Lu]Lu-PSMA-617 met the inclusion criteria. A PSA response was achieved in 30 of 74 (41%) patients. The median PSA PFS was 4.1 mo (95% CI, 2.0–6.2 mo), and the median OS was 13.7 mo (95% CI, 11.3–16.1 mo). Anemia of grade 3 or greater, thrombocytopenia, and neutropenia were observed in 9 (12%), 3 (4%), and 1 (1%), respectively, of 76 patients. Transient xerostomia was observed in 23 (28%) patients. The presence of aggressive-variant prostate cancer–associated genes was associated with a shorter PSA PFS (median, 1.3 vs. 6.3 mo; P = 0.040). No other associations were observed between circulating tumor DNA mutational status and treatment outcomes. Eighteen of 71 (25%) patients classified by SelectPSMA as nonresponders had significantly lower rates of PSA response than patients classified as likely responders (6% vs. 51%; P < 0.001), a shorter PSA PFS (median, 1.3 vs. 6.3 mo; P < 0.001), and a shorter OS (median, 6.3 vs. 14.5 mo; P = 0.046). Conclusion: [¹⁷⁷Lu]Lu-PSMA-617 offered in a real-world setting after regulatory approval in the United States demonstrated antitumor activity and a favorable toxicity profile. Artificial-intelligence–based analysis of baseline PSMA PET/CT images may improve patient selection. Validation of these findings on larger cohorts is warranted.