Pub Date : 2019-09-26DOI: 10.25264/2409-6806-2019-28-81-87
O. Diachok
work, first of all, as a source of Ukraine’s XVIth century history, pointing out that the 1611 edition in Polish was substantially supplemented compared to the first Latin edition of 1578. The scientist also characterized historiography of narrative’s research, including the issues of authorship, chronicler’s biography features, Chronicle’s source base and its impact on Ukrainian chronicle writing, handwritten translations of different editions to Russian and Ukrainian made in the late XVI th – XVIII th centuries. M. P. Kovalkyi’s publications were used by his students as a basis for more detailed studies on A. Guagnini’s Chronicle (O. O. Dyachok) and its 1611 edition’s commented translation to Ukrainian (Yu. A. Mycyk). A. Guagnini’s Chronicle was not attracting interest of Polish humanitarian scientists for a long time. Researchers were only addressing the issue of 1578 edition’s authorship from time to time. This issue has been ardently argued about since «Sarmatiae Europeae decriptio» was first introduced. However, the situation has remarkably changed over the last decade. Michał Kuran considers the Polish «Kronika Sarmacyey Europskiey» (1611) a collection of historical and geographical data, aimed at popularizing Sarmatian myth. The researcher argues, that it was Marcin Paszkowski who translated the text from Latin to Polish and supplemented it with new fragments. In Wanda Decyk-Zięba’s opinion, it was M. Paszkowski who introduced words from East European languages to the Polish text. Zbysław Wojtkowiak concluded that «Sarmatiae Europeae decriptio» was finished between May, 28 and June, 21 1574, and was dedicated to electing Henri de Valois as a Polish monarch. He considers the chronicle is a common work of Maciej Stryjkowski and Alessandro Guagnini, and perhaps somebody else. Wojciech Paszyński was studying Guagnini’s Chronicle in the context of Sarmatian theory.
首先，作为乌克兰十六世纪历史的来源，他指出，与1578年的第一个拉丁语版本相比，1611年的波兰语版本得到了实质性的补充。这位科学家还描述了叙事研究的史学，包括作者问题，编年史作者的传记特征，编年史的来源基础及其对乌克兰编年史写作的影响，十六世纪末至十八世纪不同版本的俄语和乌克兰语手写翻译。M. P. Kovalkyi的出版物被他的学生用作更详细研究a . Guagnini的编年史(O. O. Dyachok)及其1611年版本的乌克兰语评论翻译(Yu。答:Mycyk)。瓜格尼尼的编年史在很长一段时间内没有引起波兰人道主义科学家的兴趣。研究者们只是偶尔讨论一下1578年版本的作者身份问题。自从“萨尔玛蒂亚欧洲描述”首次被引入以来，这个问题一直受到热烈的争论。然而，在过去十年中，情况发生了显著变化。michaowkuran认为波兰的《Kronika Sarmacyey Europskiey》(1611)是一本历史和地理资料的汇编，旨在普及萨尔马提亚神话。研究者认为，是Marcin Paszkowski将文本从拉丁语翻译成波兰语，并补充了新的片段。在Wanda Decyk-Zięba看来，正是帕斯科夫斯基先生将东欧语言的词汇引入了波兰语文本。Zbysław Wojtkowiak总结说，《萨尔马蒂亚欧洲描述》在1574年5月28日至6月21日之间完成，并致力于选举亨利·德·瓦卢瓦为波兰君主。他认为编年史是Maciej Stryjkowski和Alessandro Guagnini的共同作品，也许还有其他人。Wojciech Paszyński在萨尔马提亚理论的背景下研究瓜格尼尼的编年史。
{"title":"CHRONICLES BY ALESSANDRO GUAGNINI IN M. P. KOVALSKYI’S RESEARCH AND IN CONTEMPORARY POLISH HUMANITES","authors":"O. Diachok","doi":"10.25264/2409-6806-2019-28-81-87","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.25264/2409-6806-2019-28-81-87","url":null,"abstract":"work, first of all, as a source of Ukraine’s XVIth century history, pointing out that the 1611 edition in Polish was substantially supplemented compared to the first Latin edition of 1578. The scientist also characterized historiography of narrative’s research, including the issues of authorship, chronicler’s biography features, Chronicle’s source base and its impact on Ukrainian chronicle writing, handwritten translations of different editions to Russian and Ukrainian made in the late XVI th – XVIII th centuries. M. P. Kovalkyi’s publications were used by his students as a basis for more detailed studies on A. Guagnini’s Chronicle (O. O. Dyachok) and its 1611 edition’s commented translation to Ukrainian (Yu. A. Mycyk). A. Guagnini’s Chronicle was not attracting interest of Polish humanitarian scientists for a long time. Researchers were only addressing the issue of 1578 edition’s authorship from time to time. This issue has been ardently argued about since «Sarmatiae Europeae decriptio» was first introduced. However, the situation has remarkably changed over the last decade. Michał Kuran considers the Polish «Kronika Sarmacyey Europskiey» (1611) a collection of historical and geographical data, aimed at popularizing Sarmatian myth. The researcher argues, that it was Marcin Paszkowski who translated the text from Latin to Polish and supplemented it with new fragments. In Wanda Decyk-Zięba’s opinion, it was M. Paszkowski who introduced words from East European languages to the Polish text. Zbysław Wojtkowiak concluded that «Sarmatiae Europeae decriptio» was finished between May, 28 and June, 21 1574, and was dedicated to electing Henri de Valois as a Polish monarch. He considers the chronicle is a common work of Maciej Stryjkowski and Alessandro Guagnini, and perhaps somebody else. Wojciech Paszyński was studying Guagnini’s Chronicle in the context of Sarmatian theory.","PeriodicalId":229424,"journal":{"name":"Naukovì zapiski Nacìonalʹnogo unìversitetu \"Ostrozʹka akademìâ\". Serìâ Ìstoričnì nauki","volume":"735 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2019-09-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"121410379","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 1900-01-01DOI: 10.25264/2409-6806-2021-32-120-126
Natalia Raitarovska
The article attempts to outline the main aspects of the situation of Rus` land in the international life of Europe in the VIII-X centuries. Vikings have long been known East Europe, and the first contacts began far away before the famous «Іnvitation of the Varangians» in the «Povist mynulykh lit». Old Ladoga became the center of a conglomerate of the surrounding Ugro-Finnish-Varyag-Slavic tribes, and is known in Arabic sources as «Slavia». Versions of Askold’s origin are also considered and the hypothesis that he probably belonged to the Scylding dynasty is supported. Askold pursued a very active foreign policy, in particular, he signed an agreement with the Byzantine Empire and was baptized. It is likely that he commissioned his own chronicle, the corrected version of which was included in the oldest Chronicle reports. As for Dyrr, the most likely assumption today is that Dyrr lived before Askold, and he was the first to try to get rid of dependence on the Khazars Khaganate, and information from the «Povist mynulykh lit» is an insert of chroniclers. The article analyzes information from the «Annales Bertiniani», which report on the famous embassy to the Frankish Emperor Louis the Pious from the Kagan of the Rus`. This message caused a heated discussion about the localization of the Rus` Khaganate. The assumption of Omelyan Pritsak, who claimed that the Rus` Khaganate was located not far from the Khazar Khaganate, and Kyiv was founded by the Khazars, does not have sufficient scientific arguments in its favor today. The localization of the Rus` Khaganate in the North-East Rus` is also unconvincing, because in the IX century the rulers of Aldeigyuborg did not make campaigns to the Byzantine Empire, and did not use the title of Khagan, but called themselves konungs. Based on a various sources, in particular using the Geographus Bavarus and archaeological research, the version of localization of the Rus` Khaganate in the Dnipro region with the center in Kyiv was supported.
本文试图勾勒出八至十世纪欧洲国际生活中罗斯土地状况的主要方面。维京人在东欧早已为人所知，他们的第一次接触远远早于“Povist mynulykh lit”中著名的“Іnvitation of the Varangians”。旧拉多加成为周围乌格罗-芬兰-瓦良格-斯拉夫部落的综合中心，在阿拉伯语中被称为“斯拉维亚”。关于阿斯科尔德的起源的不同版本也被考虑过，他可能属于锡尔丁王朝的假设得到了支持。阿斯科尔德奉行非常积极的外交政策，特别是他与拜占庭帝国签署了一项协议，并接受了洗礼。很可能是他委托编写了自己的编年史，其更正版本包含在最古老的编年史报告中。至于dyr，今天最有可能的假设是dyr生活在Askold之前，他是第一个试图摆脱对Khazars可汗国依赖的人，而来自“Povist mynulykh lit”的信息是编年史家的插入。本文分析了来自《Bertiniani年鉴》的信息，该年鉴报道了罗斯卡根向虔诚的法兰克皇帝路易派遣的著名大使馆。这条消息引起了关于罗斯可汗国本土化的热烈讨论。奥梅扬·普里萨克(Omelyan Pritsak)的假设，即罗斯的可汗国位于离可扎尔可汗国不远的地方，基辅是由可扎尔人建立的，在今天并没有足够的科学论据支持。罗斯可汗国在东北罗斯的定位也不令人信服，因为在9世纪，阿尔代久堡的统治者没有向拜占庭帝国发起战役，也没有使用可汗的头衔，而是称自己为konungs。基于各种来源，特别是使用巴伐勒斯地理学和考古研究，支持了在第聂伯罗地区以基辅为中心的罗斯可汗国的本地化版本。
{"title":"RUS` IN THE INTERNATIONAL LIFE OF EUROPE IN VIII-X CENTURIES","authors":"Natalia Raitarovska","doi":"10.25264/2409-6806-2021-32-120-126","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.25264/2409-6806-2021-32-120-126","url":null,"abstract":"The article attempts to outline the main aspects of the situation of Rus` land in the international life of Europe in the VIII-X centuries. Vikings have long been known East Europe, and the first contacts began far away before the famous «Іnvitation of the Varangians» in the «Povist mynulykh lit». Old Ladoga became the center of a conglomerate of the surrounding Ugro-Finnish-Varyag-Slavic tribes, and is known in Arabic sources as «Slavia». Versions of Askold’s origin are also considered and the hypothesis that he probably belonged to the Scylding dynasty is supported. Askold pursued a very active foreign policy, in particular, he signed an agreement with the Byzantine Empire and was baptized. It is likely that he commissioned his own chronicle, the corrected version of which was included in the oldest Chronicle reports. As for Dyrr, the most likely assumption today is that Dyrr lived before Askold, and he was the first to try to get rid of dependence on the Khazars Khaganate, and information from the «Povist mynulykh lit» is an insert of chroniclers. The article analyzes information from the «Annales Bertiniani», which report on the famous embassy to the Frankish Emperor Louis the Pious from the Kagan of the Rus`. This message caused a heated discussion about the localization of the Rus` Khaganate. The assumption of Omelyan Pritsak, who claimed that the Rus` Khaganate was located not far from the Khazar Khaganate, and Kyiv was founded by the Khazars, does not have sufficient scientific arguments in its favor today. The localization of the Rus` Khaganate in the North-East Rus` is also unconvincing, because in the IX century the rulers of Aldeigyuborg did not make campaigns to the Byzantine Empire, and did not use the title of Khagan, but called themselves konungs. Based on a various sources, in particular using the Geographus Bavarus and archaeological research, the version of localization of the Rus` Khaganate in the Dnipro region with the center in Kyiv was supported.","PeriodicalId":229424,"journal":{"name":"Naukovì zapiski Nacìonalʹnogo unìversitetu \"Ostrozʹka akademìâ\". Serìâ Ìstoričnì nauki","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"130604984","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 1900-01-01DOI: 10.25264/2409-6806-2021-32-25-31
V. Trofymovych
In article the return to the Western Ukraine in 1956–1957 of the repressed participants of the Ukrainian nationalist underground and insurgent movement from camps and special settlements is analyzed. It is shown that during the process of destalinization the Soviet government decided to release from exile a number of groups of the special settlers. They paved the way for the return to Western Ukraine of former OUN members and UPA fighters. By May 1, 1957, almost 66,000 people had arrived there and began to influence the socio-political situation in the region. The party leadership of the republic requested the CPSU Central Committee to ban the transfer of “former leaders and active members of the Ukrainian nationalist underground” to the region. Using archival materials, which have been introduced into science for the first time, the author found out that the newcomers found themselves in extremely difficult conditions. Their homes and property had been confiscated. Due to the purposeful policy of the Party and Soviet authorities and the efforts of local activists, they were surrounded by an atmosphere of harassment, hatred, hostility and rejection. There were also dramatic, contradictory, taunting pages of previous activities of some of them towards their fellow countrymen. This led many to move to eastern provinces on their own, with resettlement, organised recruitment or to return to the places of prior exile.
{"title":"RETURN TO WESTERN UKRAINE FROM CAMPS AND SPECIAL SETTLEMENTS OF PARTICIPANTS OF THE UNDERGROUND INSURGENT MOVEMENT (1956–1957)","authors":"V. Trofymovych","doi":"10.25264/2409-6806-2021-32-25-31","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.25264/2409-6806-2021-32-25-31","url":null,"abstract":"In article the return to the Western Ukraine in 1956–1957 of the repressed participants of the Ukrainian nationalist underground and insurgent movement from camps and special settlements is analyzed. It is shown that during the process of destalinization the Soviet government decided to release from exile a number of groups of the special settlers. They paved the way for the return to Western Ukraine of former OUN members and UPA fighters. By May 1, 1957, almost 66,000 people had arrived there and began to influence the socio-political situation in the region. The party leadership of the republic requested the CPSU Central Committee to ban the transfer of “former leaders and active members of the Ukrainian nationalist underground” to the region. Using archival materials, which have been introduced into science for the first time, the author found out that the newcomers found themselves in extremely difficult conditions. Their homes and property had been confiscated. Due to the purposeful policy of the Party and Soviet authorities and the efforts of local activists, they were surrounded by an atmosphere of harassment, hatred, hostility and rejection. There were also dramatic, contradictory, taunting pages of previous activities of some of them towards their fellow countrymen. This led many to move to eastern provinces on their own, with resettlement, organised recruitment or to return to the places of prior exile.","PeriodicalId":229424,"journal":{"name":"Naukovì zapiski Nacìonalʹnogo unìversitetu \"Ostrozʹka akademìâ\". Serìâ Ìstoričnì nauki","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"128065845","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 1900-01-01DOI: 10.25264/2409-6806-2021-32-97-105
M. Stopchak
The article analyzes the historiographical achievements of Ukrainian foreign historians of the postwar period on the activities of government agencies of the UPR to raise the professional and cultural-educational level of Ukrainian interned soldiers. It is shown that the party confrontation, which continued within the Ukrainian political emigration and in the postwar period, complicated the coverage of the significant efforts of the State Center of the UPR led by S. Petliura to preserve the interned Army of the UPR, its comprehensive preparation for further struggle for state independence. However, historians of the postwar period have prepared a number of works in which these activities, including and its aspects, such as military-professional and cultural-educational work, were covered much more deeply and comprehensively than in the interwar period. It is noted that not all works covered the research problem to the same extent. In some of them, mostly in the memoirs of former participants of those events, as a rule, only certain aspects of it were briefly considered, and generalized conclusions were drawn. These are the publications of V. Sikevych, M. Staroviit, M. Levitsky, Y. Artyushenko, L. Kozar, and others. authors. This also applies to some works of a monographic nature devoted to the events of the Ukrainian Revolution of 1917 – 1921 (I. Nagaevsky, L. Shankovsky, O. Udovychenko). The materials published in them on the problem are fragmentary, in fact, only outlining the directions of its further study. At the same time, the authors of some monographs (P. Fedenko), memoirs (P. Bilon, O. Semmo) departed from a simple and concise statement of well-known facts on the researched problem, presented a wide range of military-professional and cultural-educational work in camps for interned Ukrainian soldiers. It is emphasized that the lack of access to materials stored in Soviet archives, the use of former Taborites as sources of memories led to the appearance in the works of Ukrainian foreign historians of the postwar period of certain factual errors, inaccuracies, subjective assessments, which to some extent reduced their level.
本文分析了战后时期乌克兰外国历史学家对普遍定期审议政府机构为提高乌克兰被俘士兵的专业和文化教育水平而进行的活动的史学成就。文章表明，在乌克兰政治移民和战后时期持续的政党对抗，使得对彼得利乌拉领导的普遍定期审议国家中心为保存被拘留的普遍定期审议军队所做的重大努力的报道复杂化，这是普遍定期审议为进一步争取国家独立而进行的全面准备。然而，战后时期的历史学家已经准备了一些作品，其中这些活动，包括其方面，如军事专业和文化教育工作，比两次世界大战期间更深入和全面。值得注意的是，并非所有的作品都涵盖了同样的研究问题。在其中一些报告中，主要是在这些事件的前参与者的回忆录中，通常只简要地考虑了事件的某些方面，并得出了笼统的结论。这些是V. Sikevych, M. Staroviit, M. Levitsky, Y. Artyushenko, L. Kozar和其他人的出版物。作者。这也适用于专门研究1917 - 1921年乌克兰革命事件的一些专著(I. Nagaevsky, L. Shankovsky, O. Udovychenko)。他们所发表的关于这个问题的材料是零碎的，事实上，只是概述了进一步研究的方向。与此同时，一些专著(P. Fedenko)、回忆录(P. Bilon、O. Semmo)的作者除了简单扼要地叙述所研究问题的众所周知的事实外，还提出了在乌克兰被拘禁士兵营地进行的广泛的军事、专业和文化教育工作。报告强调，由于无法接触苏联档案中储存的材料，以及使用前塔博利特人作为记忆来源，导致战后时期乌克兰外国历史学家的著作中出现某些事实错误、不准确和主观评价，从而在一定程度上降低了其水平。
{"title":"MILITARY, CULTURAL AND EDUCATIONAL ACTIVITIES WITH THE UPR ARMY INTERNED SOLDIERS IN UKRAINIAN FOREIGN HISTORIOGRAPHY OF POST-WAR PERIOD","authors":"M. Stopchak","doi":"10.25264/2409-6806-2021-32-97-105","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.25264/2409-6806-2021-32-97-105","url":null,"abstract":"The article analyzes the historiographical achievements of Ukrainian foreign historians of the postwar period on the activities of government agencies of the UPR to raise the professional and cultural-educational level of Ukrainian interned soldiers. It is shown that the party confrontation, which continued within the Ukrainian political emigration and in the postwar period, complicated the coverage of the significant efforts of the State Center of the UPR led by S. Petliura to preserve the interned Army of the UPR, its comprehensive preparation for further struggle for state independence. However, historians of the postwar period have prepared a number of works in which these activities, including and its aspects, such as military-professional and cultural-educational work, were covered much more deeply and comprehensively than in the interwar period. It is noted that not all works covered the research problem to the same extent. In some of them, mostly in the memoirs of former participants of those events, as a rule, only certain aspects of it were briefly considered, and generalized conclusions were drawn. These are the publications of V. Sikevych, M. Staroviit, M. Levitsky, Y. Artyushenko, L. Kozar, and others. authors. This also applies to some works of a monographic nature devoted to the events of the Ukrainian Revolution of 1917 – 1921 (I. Nagaevsky, L. Shankovsky, O. Udovychenko). The materials published in them on the problem are fragmentary, in fact, only outlining the directions of its further study. At the same time, the authors of some monographs (P. Fedenko), memoirs (P. Bilon, O. Semmo) departed from a simple and concise statement of well-known facts on the researched problem, presented a wide range of military-professional and cultural-educational work in camps for interned Ukrainian soldiers. It is emphasized that the lack of access to materials stored in Soviet archives, the use of former Taborites as sources of memories led to the appearance in the works of Ukrainian foreign historians of the postwar period of certain factual errors, inaccuracies, subjective assessments, which to some extent reduced their level.","PeriodicalId":229424,"journal":{"name":"Naukovì zapiski Nacìonalʹnogo unìversitetu \"Ostrozʹka akademìâ\". Serìâ Ìstoričnì nauki","volume":"24 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"127049003","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 1900-01-01DOI: 10.25264/2409-6806-2021-32-85-89
Y. Bondarchuk
In recent years, researchers are increasingly focused on the Viacheslav Lypynskyi (Ukrainian politician, theorist of Ukrainian conservatism) : from practical political actions to a detailed study of theoretical reflections. They interested in various vectors of Lipin studies. It should be noted that V. Lypynskyi became sufficiently studied in recent years as the head of the Ukrainian Embassy in the Austro-Hungarian Empire. Scientists, on the work of which drawn attention in the relevant topic: Igor Ducks, Igor Girich, Tatyana Ostashko, Irina Interim and others. This article is aimed at summing a certain result in the long run of scientists. The article is trying to collect, analyze, explore and outline certain results in the historiographic study of the place of V. Lypynskyi in the international politics of the Ukrainian state. The main submers are considered, which researchers studied in the context of the activities of V. Lypynskyi as ambassador during their work from 1918 to 1919. The topics of scientific research were especially studied: Embassy staff (appointment, the appointment of those who are responsible for certain sectors and criticism of personnel by opponents, both from among the government and the social democratic forces); The struggle for territorial encroachments and at the same time ratification of Beresia Agreement (peace treaty between the Ukrainian People’s Republic on the one hand and German, Austria-Hungarian, Ottoman Empires and the Bulgarian kingdom of the other side). The strong Polish diaspora prevented the joining of the Kholm region and part of the smashes in the Ukrainian state. Also, the activity that puts themselves the goal of helping the prisoners of war in concentration camps and citizens of Ukraine, which were in Austria – Hungary); Lypynskyi’s care from the post of Representative of Ukraine in Vienna (comes to power in Kiev in November 1918, the directory of UNR and the inability to find a common language with new government structures). As a result of scientific research, we conclude that this topic is sufficiently studied. Most scientific works used during the writing of the article are combined into a positive assessment of the role of V. Lipinsky as ambassador.
近年来，研究人员越来越关注维亚切斯拉夫·利平斯基(乌克兰政治家，乌克兰保守主义理论家):从实际政治行动到理论反思的详细研究。他们对各种脂质载体的研究感兴趣。应该指出的是，近年来，作为乌克兰驻奥匈帝国大使馆的负责人，V. lyypynskyi得到了充分的研究。科学家们，对其工作引起了相关主题的关注:Igor Ducks, Igor Girich, Tatyana Ostashko, Irina Interim等。这篇文章的目的是总结科学家在长期工作中取得的一定成果。本文试图对利平斯基在乌克兰国家国际政治中的地位的史学研究成果进行收集、分析、探索和概述。研究人员在1918年至1919年担任大使期间的活动背景下研究了主要的潜水者。特别研究了科学研究的主题:大使馆工作人员(任命，任命负责某些部门的人，以及来自政府和社会民主力量的反对者对人员的批评);争夺领土的斗争，同时批准了《别列西亚协定》(乌克兰人民共和国为一方与德国、奥匈帝国、奥斯曼帝国和保加利亚王国为另一方之间的和平条约)。强大的波兰侨民阻止了霍尔姆地区的加入和乌克兰国家的部分粉碎。此外，这些活动的目标是帮助集中营的战俘和在奥地利-匈牙利的乌克兰公民);利平斯基在维也纳担任乌克兰代表时的关心(1918年11月在基辅掌权，UNR的目录和无法与新政府结构找到共同语言)。通过科学的研究，我们认为这个课题的研究是充分的。在撰写文章期间使用的大多数科学作品都被合并为对利平斯基作为大使的作用的积极评价。
{"title":"DIPLOMATIC PRACTICES OF VIACHESLAV LYPYNSKYI IN THE ASSESSMENTS OF HISTORIANS","authors":"Y. Bondarchuk","doi":"10.25264/2409-6806-2021-32-85-89","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.25264/2409-6806-2021-32-85-89","url":null,"abstract":"In recent years, researchers are increasingly focused on the Viacheslav Lypynskyi (Ukrainian politician, theorist of Ukrainian conservatism) : from practical political actions to a detailed study of theoretical reflections. They interested in various vectors of Lipin studies. It should be noted that V. Lypynskyi became sufficiently studied in recent years as the head of the Ukrainian Embassy in the Austro-Hungarian Empire. Scientists, on the work of which drawn attention in the relevant topic: Igor Ducks, Igor Girich, Tatyana Ostashko, Irina Interim and others. This article is aimed at summing a certain result in the long run of scientists. The article is trying to collect, analyze, explore and outline certain results in the historiographic study of the place of V. Lypynskyi in the international politics of the Ukrainian state. The main submers are considered, which researchers studied in the context of the activities of V. Lypynskyi as ambassador during their work from 1918 to 1919. The topics of scientific research were especially studied: Embassy staff (appointment, the appointment of those who are responsible for certain sectors and criticism of personnel by opponents, both from among the government and the social democratic forces); The struggle for territorial encroachments and at the same time ratification of Beresia Agreement (peace treaty between the Ukrainian People’s Republic on the one hand and German, Austria-Hungarian, Ottoman Empires and the Bulgarian kingdom of the other side). The strong Polish diaspora prevented the joining of the Kholm region and part of the smashes in the Ukrainian state. Also, the activity that puts themselves the goal of helping the prisoners of war in concentration camps and citizens of Ukraine, which were in Austria – Hungary); Lypynskyi’s care from the post of Representative of Ukraine in Vienna (comes to power in Kiev in November 1918, the directory of UNR and the inability to find a common language with new government structures). As a result of scientific research, we conclude that this topic is sufficiently studied. Most scientific works used during the writing of the article are combined into a positive assessment of the role of V. Lipinsky as ambassador.","PeriodicalId":229424,"journal":{"name":"Naukovì zapiski Nacìonalʹnogo unìversitetu \"Ostrozʹka akademìâ\". Serìâ Ìstoričnì nauki","volume":"53 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"124612840","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 1900-01-01DOI: 10.25264/2409-6806-2021-32-47-61
V. Atamanenko
Much of the work on the problems of socio-economic history (including urban issues) of Volhynia in the middle and second half of the XVI century are based on state tax documents. Since the Lublin Union, there are very few such sources. Besides, they did not cover a significant number of estates and settlements. A higher level of regularity of taxation and greater control resulted in better preservation of the so-called taxation registers. For Volyn, this can only be said about the two-decade period after the Lublin Union. The chronological representativeness of this group of sources cannot be considered satisfactory. This applies to the least used and practically not represented by researchers and archaeographers in circulation in the entirety of the primary registers. Much taxes registers touches latifundia of Volyn. The complex of such sources requires the implementation of their source characteristics as a separate variety (including specific historical issues) and in comparison with the already used tax documentation, mostly generalized by administrative-territorial units. State fiscal documentation consisted of several levels of sources. The first consideration of state revenue cases for the incorporated territories was already included in the resolution of the Lublin Sejm in 1569, where it occupied almost the largest volume compared to other issues and was also issued as a separate Taxation Universal. Thus, for the first time, the Ukrainian lands included into Poland received a well-developed basis for taxation. When collecting a tax, the owners or their administration created special lists – primary tax registers. All surviving primary tax registers date back to the first decade after the Lublin Union. Primary tax registers for 1576 – 1577 survived only for a few Volyn estates. Much of them touches possessions of prince V.-K. Ostroz’ryy. These are Dubno, Ostroh, Starokostyantyniv and others. One of them is register of Stepan volost 1576. The primary tax documentation contains a personal record of the population with an indication of the tax grounds for each person. In some cases (for households) they contain evidence of the gender structure and professional classes of the population. Thus, for demographic research, such sources have a number of advantages. The text of the Stepan primary reister is presented in the appendix.
{"title":"PRIMARY TAXE REGISTER OF THE STEPAN VOLOST 1576","authors":"V. Atamanenko","doi":"10.25264/2409-6806-2021-32-47-61","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.25264/2409-6806-2021-32-47-61","url":null,"abstract":"Much of the work on the problems of socio-economic history (including urban issues) of Volhynia in the middle and second half of the XVI century are based on state tax documents. Since the Lublin Union, there are very few such sources. Besides, they did not cover a significant number of estates and settlements. A higher level of regularity of taxation and greater control resulted in better preservation of the so-called taxation registers. For Volyn, this can only be said about the two-decade period after the Lublin Union. The chronological representativeness of this group of sources cannot be considered satisfactory. This applies to the least used and practically not represented by researchers and archaeographers in circulation in the entirety of the primary registers. Much taxes registers touches latifundia of Volyn. The complex of such sources requires the implementation of their source characteristics as a separate variety (including specific historical issues) and in comparison with the already used tax documentation, mostly generalized by administrative-territorial units. State fiscal documentation consisted of several levels of sources. The first consideration of state revenue cases for the incorporated territories was already included in the resolution of the Lublin Sejm in 1569, where it occupied almost the largest volume compared to other issues and was also issued as a separate Taxation Universal. Thus, for the first time, the Ukrainian lands included into Poland received a well-developed basis for taxation. When collecting a tax, the owners or their administration created special lists – primary tax registers. All surviving primary tax registers date back to the first decade after the Lublin Union. Primary tax registers for 1576 – 1577 survived only for a few Volyn estates. Much of them touches possessions of prince V.-K. Ostroz’ryy. These are Dubno, Ostroh, Starokostyantyniv and others. One of them is register of Stepan volost 1576. The primary tax documentation contains a personal record of the population with an indication of the tax grounds for each person. In some cases (for households) they contain evidence of the gender structure and professional classes of the population. Thus, for demographic research, such sources have a number of advantages. The text of the Stepan primary reister is presented in the appendix.","PeriodicalId":229424,"journal":{"name":"Naukovì zapiski Nacìonalʹnogo unìversitetu \"Ostrozʹka akademìâ\". Serìâ Ìstoričnì nauki","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"120963723","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 1900-01-01DOI: 10.25264/2409-6806-2021-32-106-111
Tetiana Yushchuk
The article analyzes the monographic studies of T. Maсkiw, which concerned the figure of I. Mazepa. The personal contribution of the historian to the study of political circumstances and public sentiments in which the documents described by scientists were created, the genesis and texts of research sources, as well as their influence on memoirists of that era are determined. Attention is drawn to the refutation by scientists of falsified data and erroneous assumptions of other researchers about the figure of the hetman. The types and kinds of sources used by T. Maсkiw in his research are described. The differences in the factual content of texts of sources of different European countries, the dependence of these texts on the place of creation of the source and its author are studied, the structure, genesis and differences of the main works of the historian on this subject are analyzed. Emphasis is placed on new information on the history of Ukraine in the time of I. Mazepa, which T. Maсkiw found in European archives. The archeographic aspect of the historian’s activity is also reflected in the article. An important contribution of the author can be considered his reflections on the objectivity / subjectivity of the European press, which covered the events of Europe and Ukraine in the era of hetman I. Mazepa, its influence on European politicians, as well as the dependence of the press on the state. The main attention in the research is paid to the ukrainian-language monograph «Hetman Ivan Mazepa in the that time western European sources 1687-1709». An analysis of the change in assessments of political events in Ukraine by the foreign press after the transition of the hetman to the side of the Swedish king, a description of the reasons for this transition, the dependence of foreign assessments of the events of 1708 on the position of the Russian Empire, causes and consequences for I. Mazepa, vicissitudes of granting the hetman the title of Prince of the Holy Roman Empire.
本文分析了马泽尔基夫关于马泽尔帕形象的专著研究。历史学家对政治环境和公众情绪研究的个人贡献是确定的，科学家所描述的文件是在这种情况下创建的，研究来源的起源和文本，以及它们对那个时代的回忆录作者的影响。科学家们对其他研究人员关于酋长形象的虚假数据和错误假设的反驳引起了人们的注意。描述了T. maserkiw在他的研究中使用的来源的类型和种类。研究了不同欧洲国家来源文本事实内容的差异，这些文本对来源创作地及其作者的依赖，分析了历史学家关于这一主题的主要著作的结构、起源和差异。重点放在马泽帕时代乌克兰历史的新信息上，这是马泽尔基夫在欧洲档案中发现的。历史学家活动的考古方面也反映在文章中。作者的一个重要贡献可以被认为是他对欧洲新闻界的客观性/主观性的反思，它涵盖了hetman I. Mazepa时代的欧洲和乌克兰事件，它对欧洲政治家的影响，以及新闻界对国家的依赖。在研究中，主要关注的是乌克兰语专著“Hetman Ivan Mazepa在当时的西欧来源1687-1709”。分析了酋长向瑞典国王一方过渡后外国媒体对乌克兰政治事件评价的变化，描述了这种转变的原因，1708年事件的外国评价对俄罗斯帝国立场的依赖，马泽帕一世的原因和后果，授予酋长神圣罗马帝国王子头衔的变迁。
{"title":"THE FIGURE OF I. MAZEPA IN THE MONOGRAPHIC RESEARCH OF THEODOR MASKIW","authors":"Tetiana Yushchuk","doi":"10.25264/2409-6806-2021-32-106-111","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.25264/2409-6806-2021-32-106-111","url":null,"abstract":"The article analyzes the monographic studies of T. Maсkiw, which concerned the figure of I. Mazepa. The personal contribution of the historian to the study of political circumstances and public sentiments in which the documents described by scientists were created, the genesis and texts of research sources, as well as their influence on memoirists of that era are determined. Attention is drawn to the refutation by scientists of falsified data and erroneous assumptions of other researchers about the figure of the hetman. The types and kinds of sources used by T. Maсkiw in his research are described. The differences in the factual content of texts of sources of different European countries, the dependence of these texts on the place of creation of the source and its author are studied, the structure, genesis and differences of the main works of the historian on this subject are analyzed. Emphasis is placed on new information on the history of Ukraine in the time of I. Mazepa, which T. Maсkiw found in European archives. The archeographic aspect of the historian’s activity is also reflected in the article. An important contribution of the author can be considered his reflections on the objectivity / subjectivity of the European press, which covered the events of Europe and Ukraine in the era of hetman I. Mazepa, its influence on European politicians, as well as the dependence of the press on the state. The main attention in the research is paid to the ukrainian-language monograph «Hetman Ivan Mazepa in the that time western European sources 1687-1709». An analysis of the change in assessments of political events in Ukraine by the foreign press after the transition of the hetman to the side of the Swedish king, a description of the reasons for this transition, the dependence of foreign assessments of the events of 1708 on the position of the Russian Empire, causes and consequences for I. Mazepa, vicissitudes of granting the hetman the title of Prince of the Holy Roman Empire.","PeriodicalId":229424,"journal":{"name":"Naukovì zapiski Nacìonalʹnogo unìversitetu \"Ostrozʹka akademìâ\". Serìâ Ìstoričnì nauki","volume":"50 4 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"130926047","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 1900-01-01DOI: 10.25264/2409-6806-2021-32-32-38
A. Smyrnov
The article deals with the establishing of the Local Orthodox Church of Ukraine, which took place in December 2018. The revolution of dignity and subsequent Russian armed aggression led to the intensification of the Ukrainian autocephalous movement. The President, the Parliament, the bishops of the UOC-KP, the UAOC, and about ten bishops of the UOC-MP appealed to the Ecumenical Patriarch to grant autocephaly to the Orthodox Church of Ukraine. On October 9-11, 2018, the Synod of the Ecumenical Patriarchate confirmed the resolution to start the procedure of granting autocephaly to the Orthodox Church in Ukraine, considered appeals and carried out canonical rehabilitation of UOC-KP and UAOC leaders Filaret Denysenko and Makariy Maletych, and restored the Patriarch’s stauropegia as the representation to the Ecumenical Patriarchate in Kyiv and repealed the act of 1686. On 15 December, before the unification council started, the UOC-KP and the UAOC held separate meetings during which they both dissolved themselves, which delayed the beginning of the unification council. Every bishop was to bring two people to vote. In the second round, laity and priests did not vote, only bishops. Metropolitan Mykhaiil Zinkevych was forced to withdraw his candidacy during the council before the final vote. In the first round, the score of the three candidates was: Mykhail Zinkevych: 38; Symeon Shostatskyi: 56; Epiphanius Dumenko: 81. In the secomd round, the votes of bishops were as follows: Symeon: 28; Epiphanius: 36. At the Unification Council on December 15, 2018, the establishment of the OCU was announced, its charter was approved and Metropolitan Epiphanius was elected as the Primate. On January 6, 2019, a Tomos on the autocephaly of the Ukrainian Church was granted to him in Constantinople.
{"title":"THE UNIFICATION COUNCIL OF THE ORTHODOX CHURCH OF UKRAINE, 15 DECEMBER 2018","authors":"A. Smyrnov","doi":"10.25264/2409-6806-2021-32-32-38","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.25264/2409-6806-2021-32-32-38","url":null,"abstract":"The article deals with the establishing of the Local Orthodox Church of Ukraine, which took place in December 2018. The revolution of dignity and subsequent Russian armed aggression led to the intensification of the Ukrainian autocephalous movement. The President, the Parliament, the bishops of the UOC-KP, the UAOC, and about ten bishops of the UOC-MP appealed to the Ecumenical Patriarch to grant autocephaly to the Orthodox Church of Ukraine. On October 9-11, 2018, the Synod of the Ecumenical Patriarchate confirmed the resolution to start the procedure of granting autocephaly to the Orthodox Church in Ukraine, considered appeals and carried out canonical rehabilitation of UOC-KP and UAOC leaders Filaret Denysenko and Makariy Maletych, and restored the Patriarch’s stauropegia as the representation to the Ecumenical Patriarchate in Kyiv and repealed the act of 1686. On 15 December, before the unification council started, the UOC-KP and the UAOC held separate meetings during which they both dissolved themselves, which delayed the beginning of the unification council. Every bishop was to bring two people to vote. In the second round, laity and priests did not vote, only bishops. Metropolitan Mykhaiil Zinkevych was forced to withdraw his candidacy during the council before the final vote. In the first round, the score of the three candidates was: Mykhail Zinkevych: 38; Symeon Shostatskyi: 56; Epiphanius Dumenko: 81. In the secomd round, the votes of bishops were as follows: Symeon: 28; Epiphanius: 36. At the Unification Council on December 15, 2018, the establishment of the OCU was announced, its charter was approved and Metropolitan Epiphanius was elected as the Primate. On January 6, 2019, a Tomos on the autocephaly of the Ukrainian Church was granted to him in Constantinople.","PeriodicalId":229424,"journal":{"name":"Naukovì zapiski Nacìonalʹnogo unìversitetu \"Ostrozʹka akademìâ\". Serìâ Ìstoričnì nauki","volume":"2001 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"128302042","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 1900-01-01DOI: 10.25264/2409-6806-2021-32-140-144
N. Zalietok
Comparison of the peculiarities of the service of the representatives of the countries of the world in different branches of the military has not found a comprehensive coverage in both domestic and foreign historiography. In the available comparisons, their authors rather briefly dwell on the general features of the policy of states with different regimes of government on the organization of women’s service in 1939-1945. However, they do not study in more detail the common and different in experiences of representatives of different states in the service of one or another branch of the military. The article examines the peculiarities of the service and life of Soviet and British women who served in signal corps during World War II. The countries were chosen not by chance, because they represent democracy and totalitarianism, respectively, and studying the experiences of women serving in their armies can deepen our knowledge of these regimes. The author concludes that the women of the USSR and Great Britain in the signal corps during World War II held positions with the same or similar responsibilities, but the everyday life of Soviet women at the front was mostly much stricter, due to the high intensity fighting. At the same time, it should not be forgotten that, despite the fact that the enemy was never able to invade Great Britain by land, its territories were subjected to massive air attacks, which posed a constant danger to the country’s inhabitants, both civilian and military. Therefore, the service of British women in the signal corps in the homeland was also associated with significant risk. Among other things, British female signals officers took part in the top-secret and extremely important for Allied troops operation “Enigma”, which resulted in the decryption of the code of the famous cipher machine of Nazi Germany. According to various estimates, the success of the operation significantly precipitated the end of World War II.
{"title":"SERVICE OF BRITISH AND SOVIET WOMEN IN SIGNAL CORPS DURING WORLD WAR II","authors":"N. Zalietok","doi":"10.25264/2409-6806-2021-32-140-144","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.25264/2409-6806-2021-32-140-144","url":null,"abstract":"Comparison of the peculiarities of the service of the representatives of the countries of the world in different branches of the military has not found a comprehensive coverage in both domestic and foreign historiography. In the available comparisons, their authors rather briefly dwell on the general features of the policy of states with different regimes of government on the organization of women’s service in 1939-1945. However, they do not study in more detail the common and different in experiences of representatives of different states in the service of one or another branch of the military. The article examines the peculiarities of the service and life of Soviet and British women who served in signal corps during World War II. The countries were chosen not by chance, because they represent democracy and totalitarianism, respectively, and studying the experiences of women serving in their armies can deepen our knowledge of these regimes. The author concludes that the women of the USSR and Great Britain in the signal corps during World War II held positions with the same or similar responsibilities, but the everyday life of Soviet women at the front was mostly much stricter, due to the high intensity fighting. At the same time, it should not be forgotten that, despite the fact that the enemy was never able to invade Great Britain by land, its territories were subjected to massive air attacks, which posed a constant danger to the country’s inhabitants, both civilian and military. Therefore, the service of British women in the signal corps in the homeland was also associated with significant risk. Among other things, British female signals officers took part in the top-secret and extremely important for Allied troops operation “Enigma”, which resulted in the decryption of the code of the famous cipher machine of Nazi Germany. According to various estimates, the success of the operation significantly precipitated the end of World War II.","PeriodicalId":229424,"journal":{"name":"Naukovì zapiski Nacìonalʹnogo unìversitetu \"Ostrozʹka akademìâ\". Serìâ Ìstoričnì nauki","volume":"32 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"133551698","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 1900-01-01DOI: 10.25264/2409-6806-2021-32-11-16
V. Starzhets
The scientific article shows the process of restoration and reorganization of educational activities of pedagogical colleges in the western Ukrainian region in 1944–1953 years. The main measures and methods taken by the Soviet authorities to restore the educational material base of pedagogical colleges are identified. The purpose of the study is to characterize the material base and trace the process of resumption of pedagogical colleges on the basis of the analysis of archival documents and verification of the works of Ukrainian researchers. Identify the positive and negative aspects of the introduction of Soviet methodology in the educational process. In the post war period, the problem of training teachers, especially primary school, remained acute. Among the Ukrainian population there was a large percentage of illiterate and illiterate people. There was a need to train primary school teachers. The Soviet government, along with measures to improve the functioning of pedagogical institutions, gave priority to controlling the level of ideological consciousness of future primary school teachers. Consequently, the educational policy of the state has acquired a pronounced ideological character. Thus, in the difficult conditions of the post war period, the Soviet government created an extensive network of secondary pedagogical institutions designed to provide the western Ukrainian region with teaching staff. The positive thing at that time was the general availability of education, the growth of the material and technical base of educational institutions that trained teachers for primary school. Simultaneously with the positive changes in the field of education, there were also negative tendencies, which were manifested in the continuous ideologizing of the educational process, constant control by the Soviet party structures.
{"title":"RESTORATION OF ACTIVITIES OF PEDAGOGICAL COLLEGES OF WESTERN UKRAINE IN THE POST WAR PERIOD","authors":"V. Starzhets","doi":"10.25264/2409-6806-2021-32-11-16","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.25264/2409-6806-2021-32-11-16","url":null,"abstract":"The scientific article shows the process of restoration and reorganization of educational activities of pedagogical colleges in the western Ukrainian region in 1944–1953 years. The main measures and methods taken by the Soviet authorities to restore the educational material base of pedagogical colleges are identified. The purpose of the study is to characterize the material base and trace the process of resumption of pedagogical colleges on the basis of the analysis of archival documents and verification of the works of Ukrainian researchers. Identify the positive and negative aspects of the introduction of Soviet methodology in the educational process. In the post war period, the problem of training teachers, especially primary school, remained acute. Among the Ukrainian population there was a large percentage of illiterate and illiterate people. There was a need to train primary school teachers. The Soviet government, along with measures to improve the functioning of pedagogical institutions, gave priority to controlling the level of ideological consciousness of future primary school teachers. Consequently, the educational policy of the state has acquired a pronounced ideological character. Thus, in the difficult conditions of the post war period, the Soviet government created an extensive network of secondary pedagogical institutions designed to provide the western Ukrainian region with teaching staff. The positive thing at that time was the general availability of education, the growth of the material and technical base of educational institutions that trained teachers for primary school. Simultaneously with the positive changes in the field of education, there were also negative tendencies, which were manifested in the continuous ideologizing of the educational process, constant control by the Soviet party structures.","PeriodicalId":229424,"journal":{"name":"Naukovì zapiski Nacìonalʹnogo unìversitetu \"Ostrozʹka akademìâ\". Serìâ Ìstoričnì nauki","volume":"26 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"128107823","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
京公网安备 11010802042870号
京ICP备2023020795号-1
扫码关注我们
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：