Background: This prospective study investigates the pattern of pareses in 5q-associated spinal muscular atrophy (SMA) to identify disease-specific characteristics and potential differences from amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS) and spinobulbar muscular atrophy (SBMA). Detailed knowledge about pareses patterns in SMA facilitates differential diagnosis and supports therapeutic monitoring.
Methods: Between January 2021, and June 2021, 66 SMA patients (59.1% male, aged 33.6 ± 15.2 years) were included in the study. Most patients had SMA type II (n = 28) or SMA type III (n = 28), seven patients had SMA type I, and three patients had SMA type IV. We analyzed the pattern of pareses using the UK Medical Research Council (MRC) scoring system.
Results: In both, upper and lower limbs muscle weakness was less pronounced in distal (upper limbs: MRC median 3.0 (interquartile range 1.5-3.5); lower limbs: 1.5 (0.5-3.0)) compared to proximal muscle groups (upper limbs: 2.0 (1.5-2.6); p < 0.001; lower limbs: 0.5 (0.5-1.5); p < 0.001). Thenar muscles were stronger than other small hand muscles (3.0 (2.0-3.5) vs 3.0 (1.5-3.5); p = 0.004). Muscles had more strength in upper (2.3 (1.5-3.1)) compared to lower limbs (1.1 (0.5-2.3); p < 0.001) and in flexors compared to extensors.
Conclusion: We identified a specific pattern of muscle paresis in SMA which is different from the pattern of paresis in ALS and SBMA. As a rule of thumb, the pattern of pareses is similar, but not identical to ALS in distal, but different in proximal muscle groups.
Background: Vagal atrophy is a hallmark of Parkinson's disease (PD) and has been found to be associated with autonomic dysfunction, while analyses of the vagus nerve (VN) in atypical Parkinsonian syndromes (APS) have not yet been performed. We here investigate the characteristics of the VN in multiple system atrophy (MSA) and progressive supranuclear palsy (PSP) and, in a second step, its potential as a possible biomarker for orthostatic dysregulation.
Objectives: The aim was to compare the VN pathology in MSA and PSP with healthy individuals and patients with PD as a differentiating factor and to further analyse the correlation of the VN with clinical parameters and cardiovascular response.
Design: We conducted a monocentric, cross-sectional cohort study in 41 APS patients and compared nerve ultrasound (NUS) parameters with 90 PD patients and 39 healthy controls.
Methods: In addition to a detailed neurological history and examination, several clinical severity and motor scores were obtained. Autonomic symptoms were reported in the Scales for Outcomes in Parkinson's Disease - Autonomic questionnaire. Further scores were used to detect other non-motor symptoms, quality of life and cognition. Additionally, we performed a head up tilt test (HUTT) and NUS of the VN. We conducted correlation analyses of the VN cross-sectional area (CSA) with clinical scores and the heart rate and blood pressure variability parameters of the HUTT.
Results: The examination demonstrated a high prevalence of abnormal autonomic response in both MSA (90%) and PSP (80%). The VN CSA correlated with spectral parameters of the HUTT, which are associated with sympatho-vagal imbalance. In addition, the CSA of the VN in patients with PD and PSP were significantly smaller than in healthy controls. In MSA, however, there was no marked vagal atrophy in comparison.
Conclusion: The occurrence of autonomic dysfunction was high in MSA and PSP, which underlines its impact on these syndromes. Our findings indicate a connection between vagal pathology and autonomic dysfunction and might contribute to a better comprehension of APS. To further evaluate the clinical relevance and the VN as a possible marker of autonomic dysfunction in APS, prospective longitudinal observations are necessary.
Delirium is a common complication in acute stroke patients, occurring in 15-35% of all stroke unit admissions and is associated with prolonged hospital stay and a poor post-stroke prognosis. Managing delirium in acute stroke patients necessitates an intensive and multiprofessional therapeutic approach, placing a significant burden on healthcare staff. However, dedicated practical recommendations for delirium management developed for the population of acute stroke patients are lacking. For this purpose, the Austrian Stroke Society, in cooperation with the Austrian Society of Neurology, the Austrian Society of Neurorehabilitation, and the Austrian Society of Psychiatry, Psychotherapy, and Psychosomatics has formulated an evidence-based position paper addressing the management of delirium in acute stroke patients. The paper outlines practical recommendations on the three pillars of care in stroke patients with delirium: (a) Key aspects of delirium prevention including stroke-specific delirium risk factors and delirium prediction scores are described. Moreover, a non-pharmacological delirium prevention bundle is presented. (b) The paper provides recommendations on timing and frequency of delirium screening to ensure early diagnosis of delirium in acute stroke patients. Moreover, it reports on the use of different delirium screening tools in stroke populations. (c) An overview of non-pharmacological and pharmacological treatment strategies in patients with delirium and acute stroke is presented and summarized as key recommendation statements.
Background: Eccentric muscle contractions elicit distinct physiological responses, including modulation of the cytokine profile. Although relevant for rehabilitation, the effect of eccentric muscle training on the immune system has never been investigated in multiple sclerosis (MS).
Objectives: Examine the immediate cytokine response of interleukin-4 (IL-4), IL-6, IL-10, IL-17a, interferon-gamma, and tumor necrosis factor-alpha after a moderate eccentric training session in individuals with MS. Additionally, further investigate the association between systemic cytokine levels at rest and clinical measures of mobility and lower limb functional strength.
Design: Observational study.
Methods: The first session included blood sampling for baseline cytokine measures. Subsequently, the participant completed a battery of clinical assessments related to mobility and lower limb strength, that is, the Timed-Up-and-Go Test, Five-Repetition-Sit-to-Stand-Test (5STS), Four-Square-Step-Test, and Two-Minute-Walk-Test. The second session included the eccentric exercise training session, followed by a second blood sampling to assess the acute cytokine response to the eccentric training bout. This session comprised 10 exercises concentrating on the strength of the trunk and lower extremities.
Results: Twenty-seven people with MS (pwMS), with a mean age of 40.1 years, participated in the study. No difference was demonstrated in the cytokine concentration values between baseline and immediately after the eccentric training session. The 5STS explained 30.3% of the variance associated with interferon-gamma, 14.8% with IL-4, and 13.8% with IL-10.
Conclusion: An eccentric training bout does not impact cytokine concentration in the blood and, consequently, does not boost a pro-inflammatory response, thus, it can be performed on pwMS in a rehabilitation setting.
Inebilizumab is one of the monoclonal antibodies approved as maintenance therapy for aquaporin-4 immunoglobulin G-seropositive neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorder (NMOSD). It is a humanized monoclonal antibody targeting cluster of differentiation 19 (CD19). Common adverse reactions include urinary tract infections, nasopharyngitis, arthralgia, infusion reactions, headaches and a decrease in immunoglobulin levels. Here, we present a case of an NMOSD patient who experienced transient hyperCKaemia after the use of inebilizumab. The adverse reactions of this very rare monoclonal antibody drug improved after discontinuation.
Eculizumab has improved recovery from ventilatory support in myasthenic crisis (MC) cases. However, the safety and efficacy profiles from prospective studies are still lacking. This study aimed to explore eculizumab's safety and efficacy in a prospective case series of patients with refractory MC. We followed a series of anti-acetylcholine receptor (AChR) antibody-positive myasthenia gravis (MG) patients who received eculizumab as an add-on therapy for 12 weeks during MC to facilitate the weaning process and reduced disease activity. Serum anti-AChR antibodies and peripheral immune molecules associated with the complement pathway were evaluated before and after eculizumab administration. Compared to the baseline Myasthenia Gravis Foundation of America (MGFA)-quantitative MG test (QMG) scores (22.25 ± 4.92) and MG-activities of daily living (MG-ADL; 18.25 ± 2.5) scores at crisis, improvements were observed from 4 weeks (14.5 ± 10.47 and 7.5 ± 7.59, respectively) through 12 weeks (7.5 ± 5.74 and 2.25 ± 3.86, respectively) post-treatment. Muscle strength consistently improved across ocular, bulbar, respiratory, and limb/gross domain groups. One patient died of cardiac failure at 16 weeks. Three cases remained in remission at 24 weeks, with a mean QMG score of 2.67 ± 2.89 and ADL score of 0.33 ± 0.58. No significant side effects were reported. Serum CH50 and soluble C5b-9 levels significantly declined, while there were no significant changes in serum anti-AChR antibody levels, C1q, C5a levels, or peripheral lymphocyte proportions. Eculizumab was well tolerated and showed efficacy in this case series. Large prospective cohort studies with extended follow-up periods are needed to further explore the safety and efficacy profile in real-world practice.
The goal of epilepsy treatment is seizure freedom, typically with antiseizure medication (ASM). If patients fail to attain seizure control despite two trials of appropriately chosen ASMs at adequate doses, they are classified as having drug-resistant epilepsy (DRE). Adverse events (AEs) commonly occur in people with DRE because they are typically on ⩾2 ASMs, increasing the potential for drug-drug interactions. Early emerging AEs may impact adherence, decrease quality of life, and delay achieving optimal treatment dosages. Cenobamate is an oral ASM with a long half-life which has proven to be highly effective in clinical trials. An international Delphi panel of expert epileptologists experienced in the clinical use of cenobamate and other ASMs was convened to develop consensus best practices for managing patients during and after cenobamate titration, with consideration for its known pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic interactions, to allow patients to reach the most appropriate cenobamate dose while limiting tolerability issues. The modified Delphi process included one open-ended questionnaire and one virtual face-to-face meeting. Participants agreed that cenobamate can be prescribed for most patients experiencing focal-onset seizures. Patients initiating cenobamate therapy should have access to healthcare professionals as needed and their treatment response should be evaluated at the 100-mg dose. Patients with intellectual disabilities may need additional support to navigate the titration period. Proactive down-titration or withdrawal of sodium channel blockers (SCBs) is recommended when concomitant ASM regimens include ⩾2 SCBs. When applicable, maintaining a concomitant clobazam dose at ~5-10 mg may be beneficial. Patients taking oral contraceptives, newer oral anticoagulants, or HIV antiretroviral medications should be monitored for potential interactions. Because clinical evidence informing treatment decisions is limited, guidance regarding dose adjustments of non-ASM drugs was not developed beyond specific recommendations presented in the Summary of Product Characteristics.
Background: Several oral disease-modifying therapies (DMTs) have been approved by the Food and Drug Administration for the treatment of relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis (RRMS). In the absence of head-to-head randomized data, matching-adjusted indirect comparisons (MAICs) can evaluate the comparative effectiveness and safety of ozanimod versus other oral DMTs in RRMS.
Objectives: To synthesize results from the published MAICs of ozanimod and other oral DMTs for 2-year outcomes in RRMS.
Methods: Published MAICs involving ozanimod for the treatment of RRMS were identified. Extracted data elements included efficacy [annualized relapse rate (ARR), confirmed disability progression (CDP), and brain volume loss] and safety [adverse events (AEs), serious AEs (SAEs), AEs leading to discontinuation, and infection] outcomes.
Results: The four MAIC studies identified compared ozanimod with fingolimod, teriflunomide, dimethyl fumarate (DMF), and ponesimod. All comparisons were adjusted for differences in age, sex, relapses within the previous year, Expanded Disability Status Scale score, and percentage of patients with prior DMTs. Outcomes at 2 years were analyzed based on comparisons that lacked a common comparator arm. Ozanimod was associated with significantly lower ARR versus teriflunomide [ARR ratio (95% CI) 0.73 (0.62, 0.84) and DMF 0.80 (0.67, 0.97)], with no significant difference versus fingolimod or ponesimod. The proportions of patients treated with ozanimod or fingolimod had similar 3- and 6-month CDP. Compared with teriflunomide and DMF, ozanimod was associated with a significantly lower risk of 3-month CDP; 6-month CDP was comparable. Ozanimod was associated with significantly lower rates of any AE and AEs leading to discontinuation compared with the other oral DMTs evaluated. Ozanimod also had significantly lower rates of SAEs versus teriflunomide and DMF and lower rates of reported infection outcomes versus fingolimod and ponesimod.
Conclusion: Compared with the other oral DMTs evaluated in MAICs, ozanimod was associated with a favorable safety profile and improved or comparable efficacy outcomes.