Pub Date : 2025-12-26eCollection Date: 2025-01-01DOI: 10.1177/17562864251360047
Matteo Lucchini, Giovanna Borriello, Shalom Haggiag, Carolina Gabri Nicoletti, Roberta Fantozzi, Maria Chiara Buscarinu, Gina Ferrazzano, Antonio Cortese, Fabiana Marinelli, Fabrizia Monteleone, Diego Centonze, Antonella Conte, Elisabetta Ferraro, Claudio Gasperini, Girolama Alessandra Marfia, Carlo Pozzilli, Marco Salvetti, Elena Barbuti, Gianmarco Bellucci, Assunta Bianco, Vincenzo Carlomagno, Alessandro Cruciani, Laura De Giglio, Claudia Dionisi, Antonio Ianniello, Leonardo Malimpensa, Martina Nasello, Viviana Nociti, Luca Prosperini, Carla Tortorella, Massimiliano Mirabella
Background: Cladribine (CLAD) stands as an oral disease modifying treatment (DMT) for multiple sclerosis (MS) patients, distinguished by its unique dosing regimen and mechanism of action. However, real-world data on its effectiveness remain limited, particularly regarding the clinical and therapeutical management beyond the 2-year treatment schedule.
Objectives: The aim of our study was to explore the effectiveness profile of CLAD in individuals with MS (pwMS). We assessed the proportion of patients achieving no evidence of disease activity (NEDA-3) status and identified variables associated with better outcomes.
Design: In this retrospective study, we collected clinical and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) data of MS patients across 10 MS Clinics in Central Italy who started CLAD between 2018 and 2023.
Methods: We evaluated the annualized relapse rate (ARR) during treatment, and the proportion of patients who experienced relapses, radiological activity, and confirmed disability progression. Additionally, we estimated the proportion of patients achieving NEDA-3 among those with a minimum follow-up of 3 months and explored baseline variables associated with NEDA status.
Results: We collected data from 1094 patients with a mean follow-up of 25.1 months, of whom 79% completed the second CLAD cycle. The mean age was 37.7 years (SD 9.7), and the mean disease duration was 6.5 years, with 40.5% being treatment naïve. Despite a significant reduction of the ARR from 0.91 to 0.04 (p < 0.01) following CLAD treatment, 8.9% of patients presented at least one relapse, while 22.0% and 7.9% of patients experienced radiological activity or disability progression, respectively. Across the entire study cohort, 70.2% of patients maintained the NEDA-3 status. Younger age (HR = 0.98, p < 0.001) and higher expanded disability status scale score (HR = 1.11, p = 0.049) were associated with a higher risk of not achieving the NEDA-3 status. Additionally, we included 131 patients who were older than 50 years at the time of CLAD initiation. Among the cohort, 116 patients switched to another DMT after CLAD, primarily anti-CD20 monoclonal antibodies following disease reactivation.
Conclusion: This postmarketing experience confirms the effectiveness of CLAD in the treatment of pwMS, with a significant reduction in ARR and a high proportion of patients remaining free from disease activity. By contrast, some patients required an escalation strategy mainly with anti-CD20 monoclonal antibodies because of persisting disease activity.
背景:克拉德滨(Cladribine, CLAD)是一种用于多发性硬化症(MS)患者的口腔疾病修饰治疗(DMT),以其独特的给药方案和作用机制而闻名。然而,关于其有效性的实际数据仍然有限,特别是关于2年治疗计划之后的临床和治疗管理。目的:我们研究的目的是探讨CLAD在多发性硬化症(pwMS)患者中的有效性。我们评估了无疾病活动证据(NEDA-3)状态的患者比例,并确定了与较好结果相关的变量。设计:在这项回顾性研究中,我们收集了意大利中部10个MS诊所的MS患者的临床和磁共振成像(MRI)数据,这些患者在2018年至2023年间开始了CLAD治疗。方法:我们评估了治疗期间的年化复发率(ARR),以及复发、放射活性和确认残疾进展的患者比例。此外,我们估计了在至少随访3个月的患者中达到NEDA-3的患者比例,并探讨了与NEDA状态相关的基线变量。结果:我们收集了1094例患者的数据,平均随访25.1个月,其中79%完成了第二个CLAD周期。平均年龄37.7岁(SD 9.7),平均病程6.5年,40.5%接受治疗naïve。尽管ARR从0.91显著降低到0.04 (p p = 0.049),但未达到NEDA-3状态的风险较高。此外,我们还纳入了131例开始接受CLAD治疗时年龄大于50岁的患者。在该队列中,116名患者在疾病再激活后,主要使用抗cd20单克隆抗体,在CLAD后切换到另一种DMT。结论:这一上市后的经验证实了CLAD在治疗pwMS中的有效性,ARR显著降低,并且高比例的患者保持无疾病活动。相比之下,由于持续的疾病活动,一些患者需要主要使用抗cd20单克隆抗体的升级策略。
{"title":"Real-world experience with cladribine tablets in people with multiple sclerosis: effectiveness data from a multicenter Italian study.","authors":"Matteo Lucchini, Giovanna Borriello, Shalom Haggiag, Carolina Gabri Nicoletti, Roberta Fantozzi, Maria Chiara Buscarinu, Gina Ferrazzano, Antonio Cortese, Fabiana Marinelli, Fabrizia Monteleone, Diego Centonze, Antonella Conte, Elisabetta Ferraro, Claudio Gasperini, Girolama Alessandra Marfia, Carlo Pozzilli, Marco Salvetti, Elena Barbuti, Gianmarco Bellucci, Assunta Bianco, Vincenzo Carlomagno, Alessandro Cruciani, Laura De Giglio, Claudia Dionisi, Antonio Ianniello, Leonardo Malimpensa, Martina Nasello, Viviana Nociti, Luca Prosperini, Carla Tortorella, Massimiliano Mirabella","doi":"10.1177/17562864251360047","DOIUrl":"10.1177/17562864251360047","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Cladribine (CLAD) stands as an oral disease modifying treatment (DMT) for multiple sclerosis (MS) patients, distinguished by its unique dosing regimen and mechanism of action. However, real-world data on its effectiveness remain limited, particularly regarding the clinical and therapeutical management beyond the 2-year treatment schedule.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>The aim of our study was to explore the effectiveness profile of CLAD in individuals with MS (pwMS). We assessed the proportion of patients achieving no evidence of disease activity (NEDA-3) status and identified variables associated with better outcomes.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>In this retrospective study, we collected clinical and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) data of MS patients across 10 MS Clinics in Central Italy who started CLAD between 2018 and 2023.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We evaluated the annualized relapse rate (ARR) during treatment, and the proportion of patients who experienced relapses, radiological activity, and confirmed disability progression. Additionally, we estimated the proportion of patients achieving NEDA-3 among those with a minimum follow-up of 3 months and explored baseline variables associated with NEDA status.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We collected data from 1094 patients with a mean follow-up of 25.1 months, of whom 79% completed the second CLAD cycle. The mean age was 37.7 years (SD 9.7), and the mean disease duration was 6.5 years, with 40.5% being treatment naïve. Despite a significant reduction of the ARR from 0.91 to 0.04 (<i>p</i> < 0.01) following CLAD treatment, 8.9% of patients presented at least one relapse, while 22.0% and 7.9% of patients experienced radiological activity or disability progression, respectively. Across the entire study cohort, 70.2% of patients maintained the NEDA-3 status. Younger age (HR = 0.98, <i>p</i> < 0.001) and higher expanded disability status scale score (HR = 1.11, <i>p</i> = 0.049) were associated with a higher risk of not achieving the NEDA-3 status. Additionally, we included 131 patients who were older than 50 years at the time of CLAD initiation. Among the cohort, 116 patients switched to another DMT after CLAD, primarily anti-CD20 monoclonal antibodies following disease reactivation.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This postmarketing experience confirms the effectiveness of CLAD in the treatment of pwMS, with a significant reduction in ARR and a high proportion of patients remaining free from disease activity. By contrast, some patients required an escalation strategy mainly with anti-CD20 monoclonal antibodies because of persisting disease activity.</p>","PeriodicalId":22980,"journal":{"name":"Therapeutic Advances in Neurological Disorders","volume":"18 ","pages":"17562864251360047"},"PeriodicalIF":4.1,"publicationDate":"2025-12-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12745522/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145865670","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-12-24eCollection Date: 2025-01-01DOI: 10.1177/17562864251401510
Bhupendra O Khatri, Regina Berkovich, Jay S Raval, Mary Dukic, Lisa Sershon
Therapeutic plasma exchange (PLEX) is a powerful and fast-acting immunomodulating therapy that is underutilized for autoimmune neurological disorders. Here, we present the largest collection of real-world experiences with PLEX procedures to date in the treatment of autoimmune neurological conditions, supporting its safety and clinical benefits with patient cases and corresponding patient videos. Our collective real-world experience with PLEX spans over 67 years, 90,210 procedures, and includes nine double-blind randomized controlled and unblinded studies serving as principal investigators. Case histories and videos of our patients demonstrate when and how PLEX should be used, identify barriers to using PLEX, and ways to overcome these barriers. Specific protocol details are shared of how to treat an acute or chronic phase of a disease. If used appropriately and early in the disease course for both acute and chronic progressive phases, PLEX can safely change the trajectory of many autoimmune neurological disorders in both outpatient and inpatient settings.
{"title":"Shaping the role of plasma exchange in autoimmune neurology: lessons learned from 67 years and over 90,000 procedures.","authors":"Bhupendra O Khatri, Regina Berkovich, Jay S Raval, Mary Dukic, Lisa Sershon","doi":"10.1177/17562864251401510","DOIUrl":"10.1177/17562864251401510","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Therapeutic plasma exchange (PLEX) is a powerful and fast-acting immunomodulating therapy that is underutilized for autoimmune neurological disorders. Here, we present the largest collection of real-world experiences with PLEX procedures to date in the treatment of autoimmune neurological conditions, supporting its safety and clinical benefits with patient cases and corresponding patient videos. Our collective real-world experience with PLEX spans over 67 years, 90,210 procedures, and includes nine double-blind randomized controlled and unblinded studies serving as principal investigators. Case histories and videos of our patients demonstrate when and how PLEX should be used, identify barriers to using PLEX, and ways to overcome these barriers. Specific protocol details are shared of how to treat an acute or chronic phase of a disease. If used appropriately and early in the disease course for both acute and chronic progressive phases, PLEX can safely change the trajectory of many autoimmune neurological disorders in both outpatient and inpatient settings.</p>","PeriodicalId":22980,"journal":{"name":"Therapeutic Advances in Neurological Disorders","volume":"18 ","pages":"17562864251401510"},"PeriodicalIF":4.1,"publicationDate":"2025-12-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12744008/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145857788","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-12-23eCollection Date: 2025-01-01DOI: 10.1177/17562864251399595
Enrique Gomez-Figueroa, Patricia Orozco-Puga, Cynthia Patricia Corona-Vázquez, Carlos Moreno-Bernardino, Graciela Elizabeth De la Mora-Landín, Amado Jiménez-Ruiz, Christian García-Estrada, Lizeth Zertuche-Ortuño, Sergio Saldívar-Dávila, Roberto Rodríguez-Rivas, Lisette Bazán-Rodríguez, José Flores-Rivera, Tomas Kalincik, Katherine Buzzard, Samia Khoury, Pierre Duquette, Matteo Foschi, Andrea Surcinelli, Bianca Weinstock-Guttman, Riadh Gouider, Saloua Mrabet, Jeannette Lechner-Scott, Helmut Butzkueven, Raed Alroughani, Izanne Roos, Francesco Patti, Bassem Yamout, François Grand'Maison, Daniele Spitaleri, Pamela McCombe, José Luis Sanchez-Menoyo, Serkan Ozakbas, Abdullah Al-Asmi, Nevin John, Elisabetta Cartechini, Anneke Van der Walt, Justin Garber, Emmanuelle Lapointe, Aysun Soysal, Eduardo Aguera-Morales, Joana Guimarães, José Luis Ruiz-Sandoval
Background: Switching disease-modifying therapies (DMTs) is common in relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis (RRMS). Vertical switching to higher-efficacy agents generally outperforms horizontal switching within the same efficacy tier, yet horizontal switches remain frequent where escalation is impractical.
Objectives: To compare real-world outcomes after horizontal versus vertical DMT switches and to identify predictors of successful horizontal switching.
Methods: Adults with RRMS who switched DMTs in the MSBase Registry (2010-2023) were analyzed. Horizontal switches were defined as transitions within efficacy tiers, and vertical switches as transitions to a higher tier. Propensity score matching (1:1) generated balanced cohorts. Multivariable mixed-effects models with a random intercept for patients were used to evaluate associations with outcomes. The primary outcome was no evidence of disease activity (NEDA-3) during the treatment period; secondary outcomes included annualized relapse rate (ARR), Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS) change, confirmed disability worsening (CDW), confirmed disability improvement (CDI), and progression independent of relapse activity (PIRA). Predictors of successful horizontal switching were explored using logistic regression.
Results: A total of 4934 matched switches (2467 pairs) were analyzed. Vertical switching achieved higher NEDA-3 rates than horizontal switching (45.8% vs 33.7%) and was associated with lower ARR, reduced CDW risk, and more frequent CDI; differences in EDSS progression and PIRA were not significant. Among horizontal switchers, 33.7% achieved NEDA-3. Success was associated with lower baseline EDSS, fewer prior relapses, and later-line switching. Outcomes varied by destination therapy: anti-CD20 agents had the highest success (≈50%), followed by cladribine (≈43%) and natalizumab (≈41%), whereas interferon and glatiramer acetate performed the poorest. Switches toward anti-CD20 therapies generally yielded better outcomes than other within-tier changes.
Conclusion: Vertical switching should be preferred when treatment modification is required, particularly for patients with active disease. However, a subset of patients can achieve disease stability after horizontal switching, especially those with lower disability and fewer prior relapses. The dynamics of horizontal switching may further influence outcomes, warranting prospective validation.
背景:在复发-缓解型多发性硬化症(RRMS)中,转换疾病改善疗法(dmt)很常见。在同一功效层内,垂直切换到更高功效的药物通常优于水平切换,然而水平切换在无法升级的情况下仍然频繁。目的:比较水平与垂直DMT切换后的现实结果,并确定成功水平切换的预测因素。设计:回顾性、基于登记的观察性研究。方法:对在MSBase Registry(2010-2023)中转换dmt的RRMS成人进行分析。水平转换被定义为效能等级内的转换,垂直转换被定义为向更高等级的转换。倾向评分匹配(1:1)产生平衡的队列。采用随机截距患者的多变量混合效应模型来评估与结果的关联。主要结局是在治疗期间无疾病活动(NEDA-3)的证据;次要结局包括年复发率(ARR)、扩展残疾状态量表(EDSS)变化、确认残疾恶化(CDW)、确认残疾改善(CDI)和独立于复发活动的进展(PIRA)。运用逻辑回归探讨了成功水平转换的预测因素。结果:共分析匹配开关4934个(2467对)。垂直切换比水平切换获得更高的NEDA-3率(45.8% vs 33.7%),并且与更低的ARR、更低的CDW风险和更频繁的CDI相关;EDSS进展和PIRA差异无统计学意义。在水平切换者中,33.7%达到NEDA-3。治疗成功与较低的基线EDSS、较少的既往复发和较晚的换线有关。结果因目的治疗而异:抗cd20药物的成功率最高(≈50%),其次是克拉德滨(≈43%)和那他珠单抗(≈41%),而干扰素和醋酸格拉替雷默的成功率最低。转向抗cd20治疗通常比其他分级内的改变产生更好的结果。结论:当需要改变治疗方案时,应优先选择垂直转换,特别是对于活动性疾病患者。然而,一部分患者在水平转换后可以达到疾病稳定性,特别是那些残疾程度较低和既往复发较少的患者。水平转换的动态可能会进一步影响结果,需要前瞻性验证。
{"title":"Real-world effectiveness of horizontal switching between disease-modifying therapies in multiple sclerosis: a retrospective analysis of the MSBase Registry.","authors":"Enrique Gomez-Figueroa, Patricia Orozco-Puga, Cynthia Patricia Corona-Vázquez, Carlos Moreno-Bernardino, Graciela Elizabeth De la Mora-Landín, Amado Jiménez-Ruiz, Christian García-Estrada, Lizeth Zertuche-Ortuño, Sergio Saldívar-Dávila, Roberto Rodríguez-Rivas, Lisette Bazán-Rodríguez, José Flores-Rivera, Tomas Kalincik, Katherine Buzzard, Samia Khoury, Pierre Duquette, Matteo Foschi, Andrea Surcinelli, Bianca Weinstock-Guttman, Riadh Gouider, Saloua Mrabet, Jeannette Lechner-Scott, Helmut Butzkueven, Raed Alroughani, Izanne Roos, Francesco Patti, Bassem Yamout, François Grand'Maison, Daniele Spitaleri, Pamela McCombe, José Luis Sanchez-Menoyo, Serkan Ozakbas, Abdullah Al-Asmi, Nevin John, Elisabetta Cartechini, Anneke Van der Walt, Justin Garber, Emmanuelle Lapointe, Aysun Soysal, Eduardo Aguera-Morales, Joana Guimarães, José Luis Ruiz-Sandoval","doi":"10.1177/17562864251399595","DOIUrl":"10.1177/17562864251399595","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Switching disease-modifying therapies (DMTs) is common in relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis (RRMS). Vertical switching to higher-efficacy agents generally outperforms horizontal switching within the same efficacy tier, yet horizontal switches remain frequent where escalation is impractical.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To compare real-world outcomes after horizontal versus vertical DMT switches and to identify predictors of successful horizontal switching.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Retrospective, registry-based observational study.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Adults with RRMS who switched DMTs in the MSBase Registry (2010-2023) were analyzed. Horizontal switches were defined as transitions within efficacy tiers, and vertical switches as transitions to a higher tier. Propensity score matching (1:1) generated balanced cohorts. Multivariable mixed-effects models with a random intercept for patients were used to evaluate associations with outcomes. The primary outcome was no evidence of disease activity (NEDA-3) during the treatment period; secondary outcomes included annualized relapse rate (ARR), Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS) change, confirmed disability worsening (CDW), confirmed disability improvement (CDI), and progression independent of relapse activity (PIRA). Predictors of successful horizontal switching were explored using logistic regression.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 4934 matched switches (2467 pairs) were analyzed. Vertical switching achieved higher NEDA-3 rates than horizontal switching (45.8% vs 33.7%) and was associated with lower ARR, reduced CDW risk, and more frequent CDI; differences in EDSS progression and PIRA were not significant. Among horizontal switchers, 33.7% achieved NEDA-3. Success was associated with lower baseline EDSS, fewer prior relapses, and later-line switching. Outcomes varied by destination therapy: anti-CD20 agents had the highest success (≈50%), followed by cladribine (≈43%) and natalizumab (≈41%), whereas interferon and glatiramer acetate performed the poorest. Switches toward anti-CD20 therapies generally yielded better outcomes than other within-tier changes.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Vertical switching should be preferred when treatment modification is required, particularly for patients with active disease. However, a subset of patients can achieve disease stability after horizontal switching, especially those with lower disability and fewer prior relapses. The dynamics of horizontal switching may further influence outcomes, warranting prospective validation.</p>","PeriodicalId":22980,"journal":{"name":"Therapeutic Advances in Neurological Disorders","volume":"18 ","pages":"17562864251399595"},"PeriodicalIF":4.1,"publicationDate":"2025-12-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12744030/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145857768","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Background: Despite significant achievements in healthcare quality improvement for ischemic stroke and transient ischemic attack (TIA), the advancements and challenges of patient adherence to secondary prevention medications remain unclear.
Objectives: We aimed to investigate adherence rates of secondary prevention medication and identified the key determinants in Chinese patients with ischemic stroke or TIA.
Design: This is an observational study.
Methods: Using the China National Stroke Registry (CNSR) database from 2007 to 2018, this observational study included patients with ischemic stroke or TIA who were admitted to the hospital within 7 days of symptom onset. The study outcome was the patient adherence to secondary prevention medications, which was defined as the consistent use of prescribed antithrombotic, lipid-modulating, antidiabetic, and antihypertensive medications post-discharge using an "all-or-none" approach. We calculated adherence rates in 3 and 12 months. Logistic regression models were used to evaluate influencing factor patterns and challenges in the improvement of patient adherence.
Results: A total of 12,873 patients from CNSR I and 15,099 patients from CNSR III were included. Patient adherence rates for secondary prevention medications increased from 66.97% in CNSR I to 80.76% in CNSR III (p < 0.0001) in 3 months, and from 35.08% to 59.81% (p < 0.0001) in 12 months. Patient age, the National Institute of Health stroke scale score at admission, disease diagnosis, the Trial of Org 10172 in Acute Stroke Treatment classification, family income per capita, alcohol consumption, dyslipidemia history, hypertension history, diabetes history, and heart disease history appeared to exhibit a significant association with adherence.
Conclusion: In spite of the remarkable progress in patient adherence to secondary prevention of stroke from 2007 to 2018, challenges remain in sustaining quality improvement initiatives, necessitating further improvements by addressing disease severity, lifestyle, medical history, and socioeconomic factors.
{"title":"Advancements and challenges of adherence to secondary prevention medications among patients with ischemic stroke or transient ischemic attack: the healthcare quality improvement in China, 2007-2018.","authors":"Yuan Shen, Xinya Li, Xue Xia, Meng Gao, Xue Tian, Qin Xu, Xiaoli Zhang, Ruobing Tian, Xia Meng, Anxin Wang","doi":"10.1177/17562864251406061","DOIUrl":"10.1177/17562864251406061","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Despite significant achievements in healthcare quality improvement for ischemic stroke and transient ischemic attack (TIA), the advancements and challenges of patient adherence to secondary prevention medications remain unclear.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>We aimed to investigate adherence rates of secondary prevention medication and identified the key determinants in Chinese patients with ischemic stroke or TIA.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>This is an observational study.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Using the China National Stroke Registry (CNSR) database from 2007 to 2018, this observational study included patients with ischemic stroke or TIA who were admitted to the hospital within 7 days of symptom onset. The study outcome was the patient adherence to secondary prevention medications, which was defined as the consistent use of prescribed antithrombotic, lipid-modulating, antidiabetic, and antihypertensive medications post-discharge using an \"all-or-none\" approach. We calculated adherence rates in 3 and 12 months. Logistic regression models were used to evaluate influencing factor patterns and challenges in the improvement of patient adherence.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 12,873 patients from CNSR I and 15,099 patients from CNSR III were included. Patient adherence rates for secondary prevention medications increased from 66.97% in CNSR I to 80.76% in CNSR III (<i>p</i> < 0.0001) in 3 months, and from 35.08% to 59.81% (<i>p</i> < 0.0001) in 12 months. Patient age, the National Institute of Health stroke scale score at admission, disease diagnosis, the Trial of Org 10172 in Acute Stroke Treatment classification, family income per capita, alcohol consumption, dyslipidemia history, hypertension history, diabetes history, and heart disease history appeared to exhibit a significant association with adherence.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>In spite of the remarkable progress in patient adherence to secondary prevention of stroke from 2007 to 2018, challenges remain in sustaining quality improvement initiatives, necessitating further improvements by addressing disease severity, lifestyle, medical history, and socioeconomic factors.</p>","PeriodicalId":22980,"journal":{"name":"Therapeutic Advances in Neurological Disorders","volume":"18 ","pages":"17562864251406061"},"PeriodicalIF":4.1,"publicationDate":"2025-12-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12743152/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145850923","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-12-21eCollection Date: 2025-01-01DOI: 10.1177/17562864251381886
Gloria Vaghi, Luigi Francesco Iannone, Michele Corrado, Federico De Santis, Marina Romozzi, Gabriele Sebastianelli, Giorgio Dalla Volta, Marco Bolchini, Andrea Burgalassi, Francesco De Cesaris, Maria Albanese, Nicola Mercuri Biagio, Raffaele Ornello, Simona Sacco, Francesca Pistoia, Gennaro Saporito, Francesco Casillo, Gianluca Avino, Antonio Granato, Antonio Russo, Marcello Silvestro, Catello Vollono, Michele Trimboli, Alberto Doretti, Mariarosaria Valente, Sabina Cevoli, Edoardo Mampreso, Cristina Tassorelli, Roberto De Icco
Background: Lasmiditan, an oral 5-HT1F receptor agonist, has been recently approved for acute migraine treatment. While its efficacy was confirmed in randomized clinical trials, scarce data is available regarding effectiveness and tolerability in the real-world setting.
Objectives: To evaluate lasmiditan effectiveness and tolerability in the real-world setting in 16 Italian headache centers.
Design: LasmiDitan as Acute migRaine Treatment (DART) study is a prospective, multicentric, observational study.
Methods: We enrolled 58 participants with migraine (84.5% females, age 49.0 (45.2-52.9) years, 24.1% with chronic migraine) reporting 9.4 (7.4-11.3) monthly migraine days. Participants were instructed to treat their migraine attacks with oral lasmiditan 50 or 100 mg. Using an ad hoc electronic diary, participants prospectively collected migraine attack features at baseline and every 30 min after lasmiditan administration, up to 2 h post-dose. The primary outcome was 2-h pain freedom for the first-treated attack after lasmiditan intake. We also collected the occurrence of treatment-emergent adverse events (AE) after administration.
Results: Overall, participants treated 100 attacks, of which 58 first-treated attacks. Regarding first-treated attacks, 44.8% of subjects rated migraine intensity as severe at lasmiditan intake. Pain freedom 2-h post-dosing was reported in 32.8% (19/58) of individuals and was associated with baseline pain intensity, being higher in subjects treating a mild/moderate attack (p = 0.044). Conversely, it was not influenced by timing of intake (p = 0.375), dosage (p = 0.727), or previous triptan failure (p = 0.351). Regarding all-treated attacks, pain freedom 2-h post-dosing was 37.0% (37/100). At least one AE was reported by 53.4% of participants (31/58), predominantly asthenia, dizziness, somnolence, anxiety or agitation, and paresthesia. Tolerability was rated as good-to-excellent by 51.8% of subjects.
Conclusion: Our study supports clinical effectiveness of oral lasmiditan 50 and 100 mg for the treatment of acute migraine attacks. Lasmiditan effectiveness was not associated with the previous triptan failure and may therefore represent a valuable therapeutic option in subjects who did not benefit from, or have contraindications to, triptans.
Trail registration: The study was preregistered on clinicaltrial.gov, NCT05903040 (https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT05903040?cond=migraine&intr=lasmiditan&rank=5).
{"title":"Effectiveness and tolerability of lasmiditan in the acute treatment of migraine: a real-world, prospective, multicentric study (DART study).","authors":"Gloria Vaghi, Luigi Francesco Iannone, Michele Corrado, Federico De Santis, Marina Romozzi, Gabriele Sebastianelli, Giorgio Dalla Volta, Marco Bolchini, Andrea Burgalassi, Francesco De Cesaris, Maria Albanese, Nicola Mercuri Biagio, Raffaele Ornello, Simona Sacco, Francesca Pistoia, Gennaro Saporito, Francesco Casillo, Gianluca Avino, Antonio Granato, Antonio Russo, Marcello Silvestro, Catello Vollono, Michele Trimboli, Alberto Doretti, Mariarosaria Valente, Sabina Cevoli, Edoardo Mampreso, Cristina Tassorelli, Roberto De Icco","doi":"10.1177/17562864251381886","DOIUrl":"10.1177/17562864251381886","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Lasmiditan, an oral 5-HT<sub>1F</sub> receptor agonist, has been recently approved for acute migraine treatment. While its efficacy was confirmed in randomized clinical trials, scarce data is available regarding effectiveness and tolerability in the real-world setting.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To evaluate lasmiditan effectiveness and tolerability in the real-world setting in 16 Italian headache centers.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>LasmiDitan as Acute migRaine Treatment (DART) study is a prospective, multicentric, observational study.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We enrolled 58 participants with migraine (84.5% females, age 49.0 (45.2-52.9) years, 24.1% with chronic migraine) reporting 9.4 (7.4-11.3) monthly migraine days. Participants were instructed to treat their migraine attacks with oral lasmiditan 50 or 100 mg. Using an ad hoc electronic diary, participants prospectively collected migraine attack features at baseline and every 30 min after lasmiditan administration, up to 2 h post-dose. The primary outcome was 2-h pain freedom for the first-treated attack after lasmiditan intake. We also collected the occurrence of treatment-emergent adverse events (AE) after administration.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Overall, participants treated 100 attacks, of which 58 first-treated attacks. Regarding first-treated attacks, 44.8% of subjects rated migraine intensity as severe at lasmiditan intake. Pain freedom 2-h post-dosing was reported in 32.8% (19/58) of individuals and was associated with baseline pain intensity, being higher in subjects treating a mild/moderate attack (<i>p</i> = 0.044). Conversely, it was not influenced by timing of intake (<i>p</i> = 0.375), dosage (<i>p</i> = 0.727), or previous triptan failure (<i>p</i> = 0.351). Regarding all-treated attacks, pain freedom 2-h post-dosing was 37.0% (37/100). At least one AE was reported by 53.4% of participants (31/58), predominantly asthenia, dizziness, somnolence, anxiety or agitation, and paresthesia. Tolerability was rated as good-to-excellent by 51.8% of subjects.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Our study supports clinical effectiveness of oral lasmiditan 50 and 100 mg for the treatment of acute migraine attacks. Lasmiditan effectiveness was not associated with the previous triptan failure and may therefore represent a valuable therapeutic option in subjects who did not benefit from, or have contraindications to, triptans.</p><p><strong>Trail registration: </strong>The study was preregistered on clinicaltrial.gov, NCT05903040 (https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT05903040?cond=migraine&intr=lasmiditan&rank=5).</p>","PeriodicalId":22980,"journal":{"name":"Therapeutic Advances in Neurological Disorders","volume":"18 ","pages":"17562864251381886"},"PeriodicalIF":4.1,"publicationDate":"2025-12-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12722647/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145828459","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-12-21eCollection Date: 2025-01-01DOI: 10.1177/17562864251401496
Samir P Macwan, Shalini Mahajan, Peter Novak, Khosro Farhad, Ericka Wong, Thomas H Brannagan, Sohail Masood, Fawad Piracha, Marinos C Dalakas
Background: Chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyradiculoneuropathy (CIDP) is the most frequently observed autoimmune neuropathy in patients with diabetes mellitus (DM). While intravenous immune globulin (IVIG) is a well-established treatment for CIDP, its efficacy in diabetic patients remains uncertain due to their exclusion from prior randomized trials, largely because of concerns about confounding diabetic axonal neuropathy.
Objectives: To evaluate the effectiveness of IVIG therapy in CIDP patients with diabetes mellitus (CIDP-DM) compared to those without diabetes (CIDP).
Design: Multi-center, prospective, observational study after at least 3 monthly infusions of IVIG therapy.
Methods: Thirty-six patients meeting diagnostic criteria for CIDP were enrolled and stratified into CIDP or CIDP-DM. All patients were followed for a minimum of 3 months after initiating IVIG therapy. Clinical outcomes were assessed at baseline (visit #1) and after 3 monthly IVIG infusions (visit #4) using the adjusted Inflammatory Neuropathy Cause and Treatment Disability Score, the Rasch-built Overall Disability Scale, and the Chronic Acquired Polyneuropathy Patient-reported Index, measured at baseline and at the point of maximal improvement.
Results: No significant differences were observed in clinical outcomes, treatment-related adverse events, or tolerance between CIDP and CIDP-DM groups, indicating comparable effectiveness of IVIG therapy. However, subgroup analyses revealed that longer duration of diabetes and elevated HbA1c levels were associated with delayed response to IVIG, likely due to cumulative axonal degeneration.
Conclusion: Despite the small number of enrolled patients, IVIG appears equally effective in CIDP patients with and without diabetes. Earlier initiation of IVIG treatment should be considered in CIDP-DM patients to mitigate potential delays in therapeutic response associated with a possibly chronic diabetic neuropathy-related component.
{"title":"Efficacy of intravenous immunoglobulin in patients with chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyneuropathy with or without diabetes: insights from a multicenter prospective comparative study.","authors":"Samir P Macwan, Shalini Mahajan, Peter Novak, Khosro Farhad, Ericka Wong, Thomas H Brannagan, Sohail Masood, Fawad Piracha, Marinos C Dalakas","doi":"10.1177/17562864251401496","DOIUrl":"10.1177/17562864251401496","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyradiculoneuropathy (CIDP) is the most frequently observed autoimmune neuropathy in patients with diabetes mellitus (DM). While intravenous immune globulin (IVIG) is a well-established treatment for CIDP, its efficacy in diabetic patients remains uncertain due to their exclusion from prior randomized trials, largely because of concerns about confounding diabetic axonal neuropathy.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To evaluate the effectiveness of IVIG therapy in CIDP patients with diabetes mellitus (CIDP-DM) compared to those without diabetes (CIDP).</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Multi-center, prospective, observational study after at least 3 monthly infusions of IVIG therapy.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Thirty-six patients meeting diagnostic criteria for CIDP were enrolled and stratified into CIDP or CIDP-DM. All patients were followed for a minimum of 3 months after initiating IVIG therapy. Clinical outcomes were assessed at baseline (visit #1) and after 3 monthly IVIG infusions (visit #4) using the adjusted Inflammatory Neuropathy Cause and Treatment Disability Score, the Rasch-built Overall Disability Scale, and the Chronic Acquired Polyneuropathy Patient-reported Index, measured at baseline and at the point of maximal improvement.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>No significant differences were observed in clinical outcomes, treatment-related adverse events, or tolerance between CIDP and CIDP-DM groups, indicating comparable effectiveness of IVIG therapy. However, subgroup analyses revealed that longer duration of diabetes and elevated HbA1c levels were associated with delayed response to IVIG, likely due to cumulative axonal degeneration.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Despite the small number of enrolled patients, IVIG appears equally effective in CIDP patients with and without diabetes. Earlier initiation of IVIG treatment should be considered in CIDP-DM patients to mitigate potential delays in therapeutic response associated with a possibly chronic diabetic neuropathy-related component.</p>","PeriodicalId":22980,"journal":{"name":"Therapeutic Advances in Neurological Disorders","volume":"18 ","pages":"17562864251401496"},"PeriodicalIF":4.1,"publicationDate":"2025-12-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12722652/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145828381","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Background: Parenchymal hematoma (PH) is a common complication of acute ischemic stroke, particularly following reperfusion therapy.
Objective: This study aimed to explore the relationship between regional perfusion parameters and PH outcomes in stroke patients treated beyond the conventional time window.
Design: This retrospective cohort study included patients from the CHinese Acute tissue-Based imaging selection for Lysis In Stroke-Tenecteplase (CHABLIS-T) trials and the Huashan Hospital stroke registry.
Methods: Regional perfusion parameters were calculated within Alberta Stroke Program Early CT Score (ASPECTS)-defined regions of interest (ROIs). Mirror indices of cerebral blood flow (CBFmi), cerebral blood volume (CBVmi), and mean transit time were derived as the ratios of median perfusion values within ASPECTS-ROIs in the lesion and its contralateral hemisphere. Absolute time to maximum values for symptomatic ASPECTS-ROIs were also recorded. Logistic regression evaluated associations between perfusion parameters and PH outcomes, with predictive performance assessed using receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves and area under the curve (AUC). Sensitivity analysis was conducted in patients receiving endovascular treatment (EVT) and in the trial-only population.
Results: Of 1010 patients screened, 313 met the inclusion criteria, and 54 developed PH. Multivariable stepwise logistic regression identified reduced CBFmi (adjusted odds ratios (aOR) = 0.07, 95% confidence interval (CI), 0.02-0.30, p < 0.001) and CBVmi (aOR = 0.11, 95% CI, 0.03-0.45, p = 0.002) in the lentiform nucleus as significant predictors of PH. ROC analysis showed good discriminative performance (AUC: CBFmi 0.71 (95% CI, 0.62-0.80), CBVmi 0.70 (95% CI, 0.61-0.79)). Sensitivity analysis in patients undergoing EVT and trial-only patients drew similar results.
Conclusion: Decreased CBFmi and CBVmi in the lentiform nucleus were independently associated with an elevated risk of PH, highlighting their potential utility in predicting hemorrhagic complications.
{"title":"Regional perfusion parameters as potential indicators of parenchymal hematoma risk following reperfusion therapy for acute ischemic stroke in the extended time window.","authors":"Xinyu Liu, Lan Hong, Guangjian Zhao, Zhijiao He, Xinru Wang, Juehua Zhu, Siyuan Li, Anqi Zhang, Nan Cao, Yifeng Ling, Xiangdi Chen, Ying Guo, Qi Fang, Ziran Wang, Qiang Dong, Xin Cheng","doi":"10.1177/17562864251406032","DOIUrl":"10.1177/17562864251406032","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Parenchymal hematoma (PH) is a common complication of acute ischemic stroke, particularly following reperfusion therapy.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study aimed to explore the relationship between regional perfusion parameters and PH outcomes in stroke patients treated beyond the conventional time window.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>This retrospective cohort study included patients from the CHinese Acute tissue-Based imaging selection for Lysis In Stroke-Tenecteplase (CHABLIS-T) trials and the Huashan Hospital stroke registry.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Regional perfusion parameters were calculated within Alberta Stroke Program Early CT Score (ASPECTS)-defined regions of interest (ROIs). Mirror indices of cerebral blood flow (CBFmi), cerebral blood volume (CBVmi), and mean transit time were derived as the ratios of median perfusion values within ASPECTS-ROIs in the lesion and its contralateral hemisphere. Absolute time to maximum values for symptomatic ASPECTS-ROIs were also recorded. Logistic regression evaluated associations between perfusion parameters and PH outcomes, with predictive performance assessed using receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves and area under the curve (AUC). Sensitivity analysis was conducted in patients receiving endovascular treatment (EVT) and in the trial-only population.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of 1010 patients screened, 313 met the inclusion criteria, and 54 developed PH. Multivariable stepwise logistic regression identified reduced CBFmi (adjusted odds ratios (aOR) = 0.07, 95% confidence interval (CI), 0.02-0.30, <i>p</i> < 0.001) and CBVmi (aOR = 0.11, 95% CI, 0.03-0.45, <i>p</i> = 0.002) in the lentiform nucleus as significant predictors of PH. ROC analysis showed good discriminative performance (AUC: CBFmi 0.71 (95% CI, 0.62-0.80), CBVmi 0.70 (95% CI, 0.61-0.79)). Sensitivity analysis in patients undergoing EVT and trial-only patients drew similar results.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Decreased CBFmi and CBVmi in the lentiform nucleus were independently associated with an elevated risk of PH, highlighting their potential utility in predicting hemorrhagic complications.</p><p><strong>Trial registration: </strong>NCT04086147, NCT04516993.</p>","PeriodicalId":22980,"journal":{"name":"Therapeutic Advances in Neurological Disorders","volume":"18 ","pages":"17562864251406032"},"PeriodicalIF":4.1,"publicationDate":"2025-12-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12722669/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145828411","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-12-21eCollection Date: 2025-01-01DOI: 10.1177/17562864251406065
Nikolaos M Papageorgiou, Lina Palaiodimou, Aikaterini Theodorou, Eleni Bakola, Maria Chondrogianni, Georgia Papagiannopoulou, Apostolos Safouris, Eleni Anagnou, Panagiota-Eleni Tsalouchidou, Effrosyni Koutsouraki, Theodore Karapanayiotides, Efstathios Boviatsis, Christos Krogias, Sotirios Giannopoulos, Diana Aguiar de Sousa, Mira Katan, Thorsten Steiner, Georgios Tsivgoulis
Background: Patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) who survive spontaneous intracerebral hemorrhage (ICH) face competing risks of thromboembolism and recurrent bleeding.
Objectives: To evaluate the safety and efficacy of initiating oral anticoagulants versus avoiding anticoagulation in adults with AF after spontaneous ICH.
Design: Systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized-controlled clinical trials (RCTs).
Data sources and methods: We searched MEDLINE, Scopus, and ClinicalTrials.gov up to August 28, 2025, for eligible RCTs randomizing adults with AF and prior spontaneous ICH to start oral anticoagulation versus avoid anticoagulation. Efficacy outcomes included the occurrence of new ischemic stroke (primary) and ischemic major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE; secondary). Safety outcomes included recurrent ICH (primary), hemorrhagic-MACE, all-cause mortality at follow-up, and cardiovascular death (secondary). Risk ratios (RRs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were pooled using random-effects meta-analysis.
Results: Six RCTs were included, comprising 403 patients in the anticoagulation group and 395 in the avoid-anticoagulation group. Anticoagulants reduced the rates of new ischemic stroke (RR = 0.20; 95% CI: 0.06-0.72; I2 = 60%; number needed to treat = 9) and ischemic-MACE (RR = 0.41; 95% CI: 0.23-0.75; I2 = 32%). Anticoagulants were associated with higher rates of recurrent ICH (RR = 3.14; 95% CI: 1.41-7.01; I2 = 0%; number needed to harm = 19) and hemorrhagic-MACE (RR = 2.35; 95% CI: 1.32-4.21; I2 = 1%). All-cause mortality at 90 days (RR = 1.06; 95% CI: 0.69-1.64; I2 = 28%) and cardiovascular death (RR = 0.98; 95% CI: 0.34-2.87; I2 = 63%) did not differ between the two groups. Leave-one-out sensitivity analyses supported the overall direction of effects, with some attenuation when individual trials were omitted.
Conclusion: In AF survivors of spontaneous ICH, restarting oral anticoagulation lowers ischemic events but raises risks of recurrent ICH and major bleeding, without a clear early mortality difference. Potential benefits may outweigh risks in selected patients within a multidisciplinary framework. Adequately powered RCTs are needed to refine agent choice, timing, and patient selection.
Trial registration: PROSPERO CRD420251135299 (registered August 27, 2025).
背景:自发性脑出血(ICH)存活的心房颤动(AF)患者面临血栓栓塞和复发性出血的竞争风险。目的:评价成人自发性脑出血后房颤患者口服抗凝药物与不使用抗凝药物的安全性和有效性。设计:随机对照临床试验(rct)的系统评价和荟萃分析。数据来源和方法:截至2025年8月28日,我们检索MEDLINE、Scopus和ClinicalTrials.gov,纳入符合条件的随机对照试验,随机分配房颤和既往自发性脑出血的成人开始口服抗凝治疗与不开始口服抗凝治疗。疗效指标包括新发缺血性卒中(原发性)和缺血性主要心血管不良事件(MACE;继发性)的发生。安全性结局包括复发性脑出血(原发性)、出血性mace、随访时全因死亡率和心血管死亡(继发性)。采用随机效应荟萃分析合并95%置信区间(ci)的风险比(rr)。结果:共纳入6项随机对照试验,抗凝组403例,避免抗凝组395例。抗凝剂降低新发缺血性卒中发生率(RR = 0.20; 95% CI: 0.06-0.72; I 2 = 60%;所需治疗人数= 9)和缺血性mace发生率(RR = 0.41; 95% CI: 0.23-0.75; I 2 = 32%)。抗凝剂与较高的脑出血复发率(RR = 3.14; 95% CI: 1.41-7.01; I 2 = 0%;需要伤害的人数= 19)和出血性mace (RR = 2.35; 95% CI: 1.32-4.21; I 2 = 1%)相关。90天全因死亡率(RR = 1.06; 95% CI: 0.69-1.64; I 2 = 28%)和心血管死亡(RR = 0.98; 95% CI: 0.34-2.87; I 2 = 63%)在两组之间无差异。留一敏感性分析支持效应的总体方向,当个别试验被省略时,会有一些衰减。结论:在自发性脑出血的AF幸存者中,重新开始口服抗凝可以降低缺血性事件,但会增加脑出血复发和大出血的风险,没有明显的早期死亡率差异。在多学科框架内,对选定患者的潜在益处可能大于风险。需要足够有力的随机对照试验来完善药物选择、时间选择和患者选择。试验注册:PROSPERO CRD420251135299(2025年8月27日注册)。
{"title":"Safety and efficacy of oral anticoagulation in patients with intracranial hemorrhage and atrial fibrillation: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled clinical trials.","authors":"Nikolaos M Papageorgiou, Lina Palaiodimou, Aikaterini Theodorou, Eleni Bakola, Maria Chondrogianni, Georgia Papagiannopoulou, Apostolos Safouris, Eleni Anagnou, Panagiota-Eleni Tsalouchidou, Effrosyni Koutsouraki, Theodore Karapanayiotides, Efstathios Boviatsis, Christos Krogias, Sotirios Giannopoulos, Diana Aguiar de Sousa, Mira Katan, Thorsten Steiner, Georgios Tsivgoulis","doi":"10.1177/17562864251406065","DOIUrl":"10.1177/17562864251406065","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) who survive spontaneous intracerebral hemorrhage (ICH) face competing risks of thromboembolism and recurrent bleeding.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To evaluate the safety and efficacy of initiating oral anticoagulants versus avoiding anticoagulation in adults with AF after spontaneous ICH.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized-controlled clinical trials (RCTs).</p><p><strong>Data sources and methods: </strong>We searched MEDLINE, Scopus, and ClinicalTrials.gov up to August 28, 2025, for eligible RCTs randomizing adults with AF and prior spontaneous ICH to start oral anticoagulation versus avoid anticoagulation. Efficacy outcomes included the occurrence of new ischemic stroke (primary) and ischemic major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE; secondary). Safety outcomes included recurrent ICH (primary), hemorrhagic-MACE, all-cause mortality at follow-up, and cardiovascular death (secondary). Risk ratios (RRs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were pooled using random-effects meta-analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Six RCTs were included, comprising 403 patients in the anticoagulation group and 395 in the avoid-anticoagulation group. Anticoagulants reduced the rates of new ischemic stroke (RR = 0.20; 95% CI: 0.06-0.72; <i>I</i> <sup>2</sup> = 60%; number needed to treat = 9) and ischemic-MACE (RR = 0.41; 95% CI: 0.23-0.75; <i>I</i> <sup>2</sup> = 32%). Anticoagulants were associated with higher rates of recurrent ICH (RR = 3.14; 95% CI: 1.41-7.01; <i>I</i> <sup>2</sup> = 0%; number needed to harm = 19) and hemorrhagic-MACE (RR = 2.35; 95% CI: 1.32-4.21; <i>I</i> <sup>2</sup> = 1%). All-cause mortality at 90 days (RR = 1.06; 95% CI: 0.69-1.64; <i>I</i> <sup>2</sup> = 28%) and cardiovascular death (RR = 0.98; 95% CI: 0.34-2.87; <i>I</i> <sup>2</sup> = 63%) did not differ between the two groups. Leave-one-out sensitivity analyses supported the overall direction of effects, with some attenuation when individual trials were omitted.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>In AF survivors of spontaneous ICH, restarting oral anticoagulation lowers ischemic events but raises risks of recurrent ICH and major bleeding, without a clear early mortality difference. Potential benefits may outweigh risks in selected patients within a multidisciplinary framework. Adequately powered RCTs are needed to refine agent choice, timing, and patient selection.</p><p><strong>Trial registration: </strong>PROSPERO CRD420251135299 (registered August 27, 2025).</p>","PeriodicalId":22980,"journal":{"name":"Therapeutic Advances in Neurological Disorders","volume":"18 ","pages":"17562864251406065"},"PeriodicalIF":4.1,"publicationDate":"2025-12-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12722659/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145828428","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-12-16eCollection Date: 2025-01-01DOI: 10.1177/17562864251396525
Jing Zhao, Shaochen Ma, Yunlei Gao, Jia Chen, Jiaqi Chen, Chong Shi, Peifu Wang, Jilai Li, Jichen Du, Zhirong Wan
Spinocerebellar ataxia type 3 (SCA3) is an inherited neurodegenerative disorder. Some of its clinical features resemble those of primary Parkinson's disease (PD), which can easily lead to misdiagnosis. There is currently no disease-modifying therapy available for SCA3, treatment is mainly symptomatic. Herein, we report a case of a young female patient with SCA3 who presented with Parkinsonian as the main manifestation and underwent globus pallidus internus (GPi) deep brain stimulation (DBS). This is a 36-year-old female patient. Her first symptoms occurred at the age of 28 in 2009, manifesting as gait abnormalities in the right lower limb. She was misdiagnosed with early-onset PD in 2011. Genetic testing showed abnormal numbers of CAG repeats (15/70) within the coding region of the ATXN3 genes. She was diagnosed with SCA3. The patient initially responded well to levodopa-based medication, but the treatment effects gradually attenuated over time, with the development of severe symptom fluctuations and dyskinesia in 2018. The patient underwent GPi-DBS surgery in the absence of cerebellar signs, cognitive, and mood disorders. Six-year postoperative follow-up results suggest that long-term GPi-DBS is effective for the control of dyskinesia, but the residual motor symptoms (parkinsonism and ataxia) had progressively worsened in the patient. Various targets have been reported to be selected for DBS treatment of SCA3, with substantial individual differences in treatment outcomes. This case emphasizes the importance of genetic testing for the diagnosis of SCA3 and provides a basis for personalized treatment of patients with SCA3.
{"title":"Long-term globus pallidus internus deep brain stimulation in a young patient with spinocerebellar ataxia type 3 initially presenting with levodopa-responsive parkinsonism: a 6-year follow-up case report and literature review.","authors":"Jing Zhao, Shaochen Ma, Yunlei Gao, Jia Chen, Jiaqi Chen, Chong Shi, Peifu Wang, Jilai Li, Jichen Du, Zhirong Wan","doi":"10.1177/17562864251396525","DOIUrl":"10.1177/17562864251396525","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Spinocerebellar ataxia type 3 (SCA3) is an inherited neurodegenerative disorder. Some of its clinical features resemble those of primary Parkinson's disease (PD), which can easily lead to misdiagnosis. There is currently no disease-modifying therapy available for SCA3, treatment is mainly symptomatic. Herein, we report a case of a young female patient with SCA3 who presented with Parkinsonian as the main manifestation and underwent globus pallidus internus (GPi) deep brain stimulation (DBS). This is a 36-year-old female patient. Her first symptoms occurred at the age of 28 in 2009, manifesting as gait abnormalities in the right lower limb. She was misdiagnosed with early-onset PD in 2011. Genetic testing showed abnormal numbers of CAG repeats (15/70) within the coding region of the ATXN3 genes. She was diagnosed with SCA3. The patient initially responded well to levodopa-based medication, but the treatment effects gradually attenuated over time, with the development of severe symptom fluctuations and dyskinesia in 2018. The patient underwent GPi-DBS surgery in the absence of cerebellar signs, cognitive, and mood disorders. Six-year postoperative follow-up results suggest that long-term GPi-DBS is effective for the control of dyskinesia, but the residual motor symptoms (parkinsonism and ataxia) had progressively worsened in the patient. Various targets have been reported to be selected for DBS treatment of SCA3, with substantial individual differences in treatment outcomes. This case emphasizes the importance of genetic testing for the diagnosis of SCA3 and provides a basis for personalized treatment of patients with SCA3.</p>","PeriodicalId":22980,"journal":{"name":"Therapeutic Advances in Neurological Disorders","volume":"18 ","pages":"17562864251396525"},"PeriodicalIF":4.1,"publicationDate":"2025-12-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12712318/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145805493","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-12-16eCollection Date: 2025-01-01DOI: 10.1177/17562864251398375
Heinz Wiendl, Hiroyuki Murai, Pushpa Narayanaswami, Francesco Saccà, Nicholas J Silvestri, James F Howard
Background: Oral corticosteroids (OCS) are commonly used in the management of autoimmune Myasthenia Gravis (MG), often in high doses for prolonged periods. Exposure to OCS is associated with significant and cumulative adverse effects. There is currently no universal consensus on the approach to OCS use in MG.
Objectives: To reach a multinational consensus on the appropriate use of OCS in MG, including the role of treatment approaches to minimize dose and support tapering.
Design: This modified Delphi study established consensus among a panel of 70 general neurologists/neuromuscular specialists from eight countries over two rounds of survey to establish best practice principles regarding the use of OCS in MG.
Methods: The current literature on OCS use in MG was reviewed. Topics of interest were identified, and a modified Delphi consensus process was created. A steering committee of six experts in MG proposed statements for testing with the wider panel over two rounds of surveys. Consensus was reached if at least 75% agreed or strongly agreed on a 4-point Likert scale.
Results: Consensus was achieved for all 37 final statements. These statements covered principles of OCS use, including a target for long-term use of ⩽5 mg/day; the role of biologic treatments in minimizing required OCS dose; the need for individualization of approach according to patient factors; and the need for detailed guidance regarding how and when to taper OCS dose.
Conclusion: These findings reinforce a shift in the management of MG, advocating for the judicious and sparing use of OCS against the backdrop of expanding therapeutic options. As additional evidence-based data emerge, these recommendations should be updated.
{"title":"Appropriate use of steroids for patients with generalized Myasthenia Gravis: an international Delphi study.","authors":"Heinz Wiendl, Hiroyuki Murai, Pushpa Narayanaswami, Francesco Saccà, Nicholas J Silvestri, James F Howard","doi":"10.1177/17562864251398375","DOIUrl":"10.1177/17562864251398375","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Oral corticosteroids (OCS) are commonly used in the management of autoimmune Myasthenia Gravis (MG), often in high doses for prolonged periods. Exposure to OCS is associated with significant and cumulative adverse effects. There is currently no universal consensus on the approach to OCS use in MG.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To reach a multinational consensus on the appropriate use of OCS in MG, including the role of treatment approaches to minimize dose and support tapering.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>This modified Delphi study established consensus among a panel of 70 general neurologists/neuromuscular specialists from eight countries over two rounds of survey to establish best practice principles regarding the use of OCS in MG.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The current literature on OCS use in MG was reviewed. Topics of interest were identified, and a modified Delphi consensus process was created. A steering committee of six experts in MG proposed statements for testing with the wider panel over two rounds of surveys. Consensus was reached if at least 75% agreed or strongly agreed on a 4-point Likert scale.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Consensus was achieved for all 37 final statements. These statements covered principles of OCS use, including a target for long-term use of ⩽5 mg/day; the role of biologic treatments in minimizing required OCS dose; the need for individualization of approach according to patient factors; and the need for detailed guidance regarding how and when to taper OCS dose.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>These findings reinforce a shift in the management of MG, advocating for the judicious and sparing use of OCS against the backdrop of expanding therapeutic options. As additional evidence-based data emerge, these recommendations should be updated.</p>","PeriodicalId":22980,"journal":{"name":"Therapeutic Advances in Neurological Disorders","volume":"18 ","pages":"17562864251398375"},"PeriodicalIF":4.1,"publicationDate":"2025-12-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12709019/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145782860","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}