Pub Date : 2025-06-19eCollection Date: 2025-01-01DOI: 10.1177/17562864251342855
Fabio Buttari, Ettore Dolcetti, Francesca Romana Rizzo, Caterina Rizzi, Gianluca Lauritano, Angela Borrelli, Federica Azzolini, Roberta Fantozzi, Francesco Assogna, Antonella Conte, Diego Centonze
Multiple sclerosis (MS) is an autoimmune condition characterized by inflammatory demyelination that leads to irreversible neurological damage within the central nervous system (CNS). This review examines the therapeutic potential and clinical efficacy of cladribine tablets (CladT) for treating MS, focusing on the immune reconstitution mechanism and CNS effects. CladT represents a notable advance among disease-modifying therapies for MS due to its selective targeting of lymphocytes, resulting in sustained yet reversible immune modulation. This action leads to a substantial reduction in memory B cells while preserving the innate immune system and maintaining immunoglobulin levels, thereby mitigating the risks of secondary autoimmunity and infection. Cladribine appears to penetrate the blood-brain barrier, as indicated by cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) studies from parenteral cladribine use. In MS, CladT is associated with reductions in CSF immunological markers, such as oligoclonal bands and neurofilament light chain levels; it also mitigates acute and chronic inflammation, as evidenced, respectively, by consistent reductions in unique active lesions, and significant decrease in slowly expanding lesions in patients with predominant grey matter damage. These findings underscore the potential of CladT in reducing disability accumulation and improving long-term clinical outcomes in patients with highly active disease. By synthesizing data from clinical trials and real-world studies, this review underscores the effectiveness of CladT in reducing relapse rates, disability progression and magnetic resonance imaging-detected disease activity and emphasizes the importance of early high-efficacy treatment for optimizing long-term outcomes. Furthermore, emerging biomarkers are discussed as potential tools for predicting individual responses to therapy, thereby enabling more personalized treatment strategies. This review also provides valuable insights into the positive impact of CladT on quality of life measures, long-term outcomes and safety profile, all of which support the use of CladT in the evolving landscape of MS management.
{"title":"Cladribine tablets in the new multiple sclerosis era.","authors":"Fabio Buttari, Ettore Dolcetti, Francesca Romana Rizzo, Caterina Rizzi, Gianluca Lauritano, Angela Borrelli, Federica Azzolini, Roberta Fantozzi, Francesco Assogna, Antonella Conte, Diego Centonze","doi":"10.1177/17562864251342855","DOIUrl":"10.1177/17562864251342855","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Multiple sclerosis (MS) is an autoimmune condition characterized by inflammatory demyelination that leads to irreversible neurological damage within the central nervous system (CNS). This review examines the therapeutic potential and clinical efficacy of cladribine tablets (CladT) for treating MS, focusing on the immune reconstitution mechanism and CNS effects. CladT represents a notable advance among disease-modifying therapies for MS due to its selective targeting of lymphocytes, resulting in sustained yet reversible immune modulation. This action leads to a substantial reduction in memory B cells while preserving the innate immune system and maintaining immunoglobulin levels, thereby mitigating the risks of secondary autoimmunity and infection. Cladribine appears to penetrate the blood-brain barrier, as indicated by cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) studies from parenteral cladribine use. In MS, CladT is associated with reductions in CSF immunological markers, such as oligoclonal bands and neurofilament light chain levels; it also mitigates acute and chronic inflammation, as evidenced, respectively, by consistent reductions in unique active lesions, and significant decrease in slowly expanding lesions in patients with predominant grey matter damage. These findings underscore the potential of CladT in reducing disability accumulation and improving long-term clinical outcomes in patients with highly active disease. By synthesizing data from clinical trials and real-world studies, this review underscores the effectiveness of CladT in reducing relapse rates, disability progression and magnetic resonance imaging-detected disease activity and emphasizes the importance of early high-efficacy treatment for optimizing long-term outcomes. Furthermore, emerging biomarkers are discussed as potential tools for predicting individual responses to therapy, thereby enabling more personalized treatment strategies. This review also provides valuable insights into the positive impact of CladT on quality of life measures, long-term outcomes and safety profile, all of which support the use of CladT in the evolving landscape of MS management.</p>","PeriodicalId":22980,"journal":{"name":"Therapeutic Advances in Neurological Disorders","volume":"18 ","pages":"17562864251342855"},"PeriodicalIF":4.7,"publicationDate":"2025-06-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12179467/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144476756","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-06-14eCollection Date: 2025-01-01DOI: 10.1177/17562864251343574
Ali Hammed, Almonzer Al-Qiami, Ali Hasan, Gregor Richter, Asmaa Zakria Alnajjar, Josef Rosenbauer, Karel Kostev, Omar Ismail, Veit Braun, Christian Tanislav
Background: There is currently no established standard of care for recurrent glioblastoma (GBM). Re-irradiation (re-RT) and Bevacizumab (BEV) are both used in salvage treatment, but their combined efficacy remains uncertain.
Objectives: To evaluate whether combining re-irradiation with BEV improves survival outcomes compared to BEV alone in patients with recurrent high-grade gliomas (rHGG).
Design: Systematic review and meta-analysis of two-arm clinical trials.
Data sources and methods: A comprehensive literature search was conducted in Scopus, PubMed, Web of Science, and the Cochrane Library up to April 2024. Two independent reviewers assessed studies for eligibility and extracted data. Study quality was evaluated using the ROBINS-I and ROBINS-II tools. The primary outcome was overall survival (OS); secondary outcomes included progression-free survival (PFS), toxicity, and prognostic factors.
Results: The meta-analysis demonstrated a significant improvement in OS with combined BEV and re-irradiation compared to BEV alone (hazard ratio (HR) 0.69, 95% confidence interval (CI: 0.56-0.85); p = 0.0005), corresponding to a 31% reduction in the risk of death. PFS also improved significantly (HR 0.64, 95% CI (0.45-0.90); p = 0.01). No significant increase in grade 3 toxicities was observed with the combination therapy. Subgroup analyses indicated that younger age and female gender were statistically associated with better OS, though the effect of age was modest and male gender was linked to poorer survival. Karnofsky performance status significantly influenced survival. Pulsed versus non-pulsed re-irradiation showed no differential effect on outcomes.
Conclusion: The combination of re-irradiation and BEV significantly improves both OS and PFS in patients with rHGG, without increasing severe toxicity. These findings support the safety and efficacy of the combined approach. Prospective trials are warranted to guide standardized treatment protocols.
Trial registration: This review was prospectively registered with PROSPERO (CRD42023463183).
背景:目前对于复发性胶质母细胞瘤(GBM)没有既定的治疗标准。再照射(re-RT)和贝伐单抗(BEV)均用于挽救性治疗,但其联合疗效尚不确定。目的:评估与单独BEV相比,再照射联合BEV是否能改善复发性高级别胶质瘤(rHGG)患者的生存结果。设计:对两组临床试验进行系统回顾和荟萃分析。数据来源和方法:截止2024年4月,在Scopus、PubMed、Web of Science和Cochrane Library进行了全面的文献检索。两名独立审稿人评估了研究的合格性并提取了数据。采用ROBINS-I和ROBINS-II工具评价研究质量。主要终点是总生存期(OS);次要结局包括无进展生存期(PFS)、毒性和预后因素。结果:荟萃分析显示,与单独BEV相比,联合BEV和再照射的OS显著改善(风险比(HR) 0.69, 95%可信区间(CI: 0.56-0.85);P = 0.0005),死亡风险降低了31%。PFS也显著改善(HR 0.64, 95% CI (0.45-0.90);p = 0.01)。联合治疗未观察到3级毒性显著增加。亚组分析表明,年龄较小和女性与较好的OS有统计学关联,尽管年龄的影响不大,男性与较差的生存率相关。Karnofsky性能状态显著影响成活率。脉冲与非脉冲再照射对结果没有差异影响。结论:再照射联合BEV可显著改善rHGG患者的OS和PFS,且未增加严重毒性。这些发现支持了联合疗法的安全性和有效性。有必要进行前瞻性试验,以指导标准化的治疗方案。试验注册:本综述在PROSPERO前瞻性注册(CRD42023463183)。
{"title":"Efficacy and safety of combining re-irradiation with bevacizumab compared to bevacizumab alone in the management of recurrent high-grade gliomas: a meta-analysis and systematic review.","authors":"Ali Hammed, Almonzer Al-Qiami, Ali Hasan, Gregor Richter, Asmaa Zakria Alnajjar, Josef Rosenbauer, Karel Kostev, Omar Ismail, Veit Braun, Christian Tanislav","doi":"10.1177/17562864251343574","DOIUrl":"10.1177/17562864251343574","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>There is currently no established standard of care for recurrent glioblastoma (GBM). Re-irradiation (re-RT) and Bevacizumab (BEV) are both used in salvage treatment, but their combined efficacy remains uncertain.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To evaluate whether combining re-irradiation with BEV improves survival outcomes compared to BEV alone in patients with recurrent high-grade gliomas (rHGG).</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Systematic review and meta-analysis of two-arm clinical trials.</p><p><strong>Data sources and methods: </strong>A comprehensive literature search was conducted in Scopus, PubMed, Web of Science, and the Cochrane Library up to April 2024. Two independent reviewers assessed studies for eligibility and extracted data. Study quality was evaluated using the ROBINS-I and ROBINS-II tools. The primary outcome was overall survival (OS); secondary outcomes included progression-free survival (PFS), toxicity, and prognostic factors.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The meta-analysis demonstrated a significant improvement in OS with combined BEV and re-irradiation compared to BEV alone (hazard ratio (HR) 0.69, 95% confidence interval (CI: 0.56-0.85); <i>p</i> = 0.0005), corresponding to a 31% reduction in the risk of death. PFS also improved significantly (HR 0.64, 95% CI (0.45-0.90); <i>p</i> = 0.01). No significant increase in grade 3 toxicities was observed with the combination therapy. Subgroup analyses indicated that younger age and female gender were statistically associated with better OS, though the effect of age was modest and male gender was linked to poorer survival. Karnofsky performance status significantly influenced survival. Pulsed versus non-pulsed re-irradiation showed no differential effect on outcomes.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The combination of re-irradiation and BEV significantly improves both OS and PFS in patients with rHGG, without increasing severe toxicity. These findings support the safety and efficacy of the combined approach. Prospective trials are warranted to guide standardized treatment protocols.</p><p><strong>Trial registration: </strong>This review was prospectively registered with PROSPERO (CRD42023463183).</p>","PeriodicalId":22980,"journal":{"name":"Therapeutic Advances in Neurological Disorders","volume":"18 ","pages":"17562864251343574"},"PeriodicalIF":4.7,"publicationDate":"2025-06-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12171250/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144317903","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-06-10eCollection Date: 2025-01-01DOI: 10.1177/17562864251342429
Ming-Ya Luo, Yang Qu, Peng Zhang, Reziya Abuduxukuer, Li-Juan Wang, Li-Chong Yang, Zhi-Guo Li, Xiao-Dong Liu, Ce Han, Dan Li, Wei-Jia Wang, Dian-Ping Lv, Ming Liu, Jian Gao, Jing Xu, Yongfei Jiang, Hai-Nan Chen, Fu-Jin Li, Li-Ming Sun, Qi-Dong Sun, Yingbin Qi, Si-Yin Sun, Yu Zhang, Zhen-Ni Guo, Yi Yang
Background: Acute ischemic stroke (AIS) is a leading cause of mortality and disability worldwide. Intravenous thrombolysis (IVT) improves recovery, but predicting outcomes remains challenging. Machine learning (ML) and biomarkers like ubiquitin carboxyl-terminal hydrolase L1 (UCH-L1), S100 calcium-binding protein β (S100β), and neuron-specific enolase (NSE) may enhance prognostic accuracy.
Objectives: We aimed to assess the predictive value of serum brain injury biomarkers for 3-month outcomes in AIS patients treated with IVT, using an ML-based model.
Design: A multicenter prospective cohort study was conducted, enrolling AIS patients treated with recombinant tissue plasminogen activator from 16 hospitals.
Methods: Of 1580 patients, 1028 were included and divided into training (n = 571), testing (n = 243), and external validation (n = 214) cohorts. Thirty-three variables, including demographics, clinical data, and biomarkers (UCH-L1, S100β, NSE), were analyzed. Least Absolute Shrinkage and Selection Operator regression was used for feature selection, and six ML algorithms were tested. Model performance was evaluated using the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC), F1-score, calibration curve, and decision curve analysis.
Results: The light gradient boosting machines (LightGBM) model achieved the best performance in the training dataset (AUC: 0.846; F1-score: 0.789) and external validation dataset (AUC: 0.714). Eight critical predictors, including age, admission National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS) score, Trial of Org 10172 in Acute Stroke Treatment, white blood cell, finger blood glucose, UCH-L1, S100β, and NSE, were identified and incorporated into an ML model for clinical application. Shapley additive interpretation analysis enhances the interpretability of the model, with NIHSS score and NSE as top contributors. External validation confirmed good calibration and consistent net benefit across threshold probabilities (0.1-0.8).
Conclusion: Integrating serum biomarkers (UCH-L1, S100β, NSE) with ML significantly improves 3-month outcome prediction in AIS patients. The LightGBM model offers robust performance and clinical interpretability for individualized treatment planning.
{"title":"Prediction of outcomes following intravenous thrombolysis in patients with acute ischemic stroke using serum UCH-L1, S100β, and NSE: a multicenter prospective cohort study employing machine learning methods.","authors":"Ming-Ya Luo, Yang Qu, Peng Zhang, Reziya Abuduxukuer, Li-Juan Wang, Li-Chong Yang, Zhi-Guo Li, Xiao-Dong Liu, Ce Han, Dan Li, Wei-Jia Wang, Dian-Ping Lv, Ming Liu, Jian Gao, Jing Xu, Yongfei Jiang, Hai-Nan Chen, Fu-Jin Li, Li-Ming Sun, Qi-Dong Sun, Yingbin Qi, Si-Yin Sun, Yu Zhang, Zhen-Ni Guo, Yi Yang","doi":"10.1177/17562864251342429","DOIUrl":"10.1177/17562864251342429","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Acute ischemic stroke (AIS) is a leading cause of mortality and disability worldwide. Intravenous thrombolysis (IVT) improves recovery, but predicting outcomes remains challenging. Machine learning (ML) and biomarkers like ubiquitin carboxyl-terminal hydrolase L1 (UCH-L1), S100 calcium-binding protein β (S100β), and neuron-specific enolase (NSE) may enhance prognostic accuracy.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>We aimed to assess the predictive value of serum brain injury biomarkers for 3-month outcomes in AIS patients treated with IVT, using an ML-based model.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>A multicenter prospective cohort study was conducted, enrolling AIS patients treated with recombinant tissue plasminogen activator from 16 hospitals.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Of 1580 patients, 1028 were included and divided into training (<i>n</i> = 571), testing (<i>n</i> = 243), and external validation (<i>n</i> = 214) cohorts. Thirty-three variables, including demographics, clinical data, and biomarkers (UCH-L1, S100β, NSE), were analyzed. Least Absolute Shrinkage and Selection Operator regression was used for feature selection, and six ML algorithms were tested. Model performance was evaluated using the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC), <i>F</i>1-score, calibration curve, and decision curve analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The light gradient boosting machines (LightGBM) model achieved the best performance in the training dataset (AUC: 0.846; <i>F</i>1-score: 0.789) and external validation dataset (AUC: 0.714). Eight critical predictors, including age, admission National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS) score, Trial of Org 10172 in Acute Stroke Treatment, white blood cell, finger blood glucose, UCH-L1, S100β, and NSE, were identified and incorporated into an ML model for clinical application. Shapley additive interpretation analysis enhances the interpretability of the model, with NIHSS score and NSE as top contributors. External validation confirmed good calibration and consistent net benefit across threshold probabilities (0.1-0.8).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Integrating serum biomarkers (UCH-L1, S100β, NSE) with ML significantly improves 3-month outcome prediction in AIS patients. The LightGBM model offers robust performance and clinical interpretability for individualized treatment planning.</p>","PeriodicalId":22980,"journal":{"name":"Therapeutic Advances in Neurological Disorders","volume":"18 ","pages":"17562864251342429"},"PeriodicalIF":4.7,"publicationDate":"2025-06-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12159470/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144286572","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-06-08eCollection Date: 2025-01-01DOI: 10.1177/17562864251337431
Jessica Ailani, Nemin Chen, Avani Patel, Nathan Spence, Nikoletta Sternbach, Katie B Tellor, Motomori Lewis, Joshua Brown
Background: Migraine inflicts substantial personal, social, and economic tolls on many adults in the United States (US). Acute and preventive medicines can offer some relief, but most patients are untreated or experience treatment failures. How preventive-treatment failures affect outcomes for patients no longer on preventive treatments or for patients with migraine is insufficiently understood.
Objective: To measure the patient-reported health and economic burdens associated with increasing preventive-treatment failures among US adults with diagnosed migraine.
Design: Retrospective, cross-sectional study.
Methods: Data analyzed were from the 2023 US National Health and Wellness Survey. Participants were adults diagnosed with migraine, having ≥4 monthly migraine or headache days, having taken acute or preventive prescription migraine medications or currently taking acute prescription migraine medications, and taking no preventive migraine medications. Participants were categorized as never treated with preventive medicines, having failed 1 preventive medicine, or having failed ≥2 preventive medicines. Health-related quality of life (HRQoL) was assessed with the Migraine Disability Assessment, RAND's 36-Item Short Form Survey Instrument, 5-Level EuroQoL instrument (EQ-5D), Work Productivity and Activity Impairment General Health version, 9-Item Patient Health Questionnaire, and 7-Item Generalized Anxiety Disorder scale. Details about medication use and health care resource use (HCRU) were collected. Data were adjusted by inverse probability of treatment weighting and compared using two-sided two-sample t-tests or Chi-square tests.
Results: Patients who had failed preventive treatments had poorer HRQoL, greater work productivity loss, greater nonwork activity impairment, and greater HCRU than patients who had never taken preventive treatments. The number of preventive-treatment failures scaled with disease burden. Patients with ≥2 treatment failures had significantly lower EQ-5D scores (0.69 vs 0.73) than those for prevention-naïve patients; patients with ≥2 treatment failures had significantly higher overall work productivity loss (45.9% vs 34.9%), activity impairment (46.8% vs 36.7%), and higher rates of emergency room visits (37.0% vs 25.2%), hospitalization (23.5% vs 12.3%), and neurologist visits (17.6 vs 10.9%) than those of prevention-naïve patients. Medication overuse rates were similar among patients with any treatment failures and prevention-naïve patients (migraine-specific: 34.4%-39.3%; overall: 59.2%-62.3%).
Conclusion: US adults with frequent migraines who failed preventive treatments have significantly greater unmet needs and different acute medication use patterns than adults who never took treatments.
背景:在美国,偏头痛对许多成年人造成了巨大的个人、社会和经济损失。急性和预防性药物可以提供一些缓解,但大多数患者未经治疗或经历治疗失败。预防治疗失败如何影响不再接受预防治疗的患者或偏头痛患者的预后尚不清楚。目的:在美国诊断为偏头痛的成年人中,测量患者报告的与预防治疗失败增加相关的健康和经济负担。设计:回顾性、横断面研究。方法:数据分析来自2023年美国国家健康与健康调查。参与者是诊断为偏头痛的成年人,每月偏头痛或头痛天数≥4天,曾服用急性或预防性处方偏头痛药物或目前正在服用急性处方偏头痛药物,未服用预防性偏头痛药物。参与者被分类为从未使用过预防药物、1种预防药物治疗失败或2种以上预防药物治疗失败。健康相关生活质量(HRQoL)采用偏头痛残疾评估、RAND的36项简短问卷调查工具、5级EuroQoL工具(EQ-5D)、工作效率和活动障碍一般健康版、9项患者健康问卷和7项广泛性焦虑障碍量表进行评估。收集药物使用和卫生保健资源使用(HCRU)的详细信息。采用处理加权逆概率法调整数据,采用双侧双样本t检验或卡方检验进行比较。结果:与未接受预防治疗的患者相比,预防治疗失败的患者HRQoL较差,工作效率损失较大,非工作活动障碍较大,HCRU较大。预防治疗失败的数量随着疾病负担的增加而增加。≥2次治疗失败患者的EQ-5D评分显著低于prevention-naïve患者(0.69 vs 0.73);≥2次治疗失败的患者总体工作效率损失(45.9% vs 34.9%)、活动障碍(46.8% vs 36.7%)显著高于prevention-naïve患者,急诊室就诊率(37.0% vs 25.2%)、住院率(23.5% vs 12.3%)和神经科就诊率(17.6% vs 10.9%)也高于prevention-naïve患者。任何治疗失败的患者和prevention-naïve患者的药物过度使用率相似(偏头痛特异性:34.4%-39.3%;总体:59.2% - -62.3%)。结论:预防治疗失败的美国成人频繁偏头痛患者的未满足需求和急性药物使用模式明显大于未接受治疗的成年人。
{"title":"Measuring incremental burdens associated with increasing preventive-treatment failures among adults with migraine: a retrospective, cross-sectional study.","authors":"Jessica Ailani, Nemin Chen, Avani Patel, Nathan Spence, Nikoletta Sternbach, Katie B Tellor, Motomori Lewis, Joshua Brown","doi":"10.1177/17562864251337431","DOIUrl":"10.1177/17562864251337431","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Migraine inflicts substantial personal, social, and economic tolls on many adults in the United States (US). Acute and preventive medicines can offer some relief, but most patients are untreated or experience treatment failures. How preventive-treatment failures affect outcomes for patients no longer on preventive treatments or for patients with migraine is insufficiently understood.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To measure the patient-reported health and economic burdens associated with increasing preventive-treatment failures among US adults with diagnosed migraine.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Retrospective, cross-sectional study.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Data analyzed were from the 2023 US National Health and Wellness Survey. Participants were adults diagnosed with migraine, having ≥4 monthly migraine or headache days, having taken acute or preventive prescription migraine medications or currently taking acute prescription migraine medications, and taking no preventive migraine medications. Participants were categorized as never treated with preventive medicines, having failed 1 preventive medicine, or having failed ≥2 preventive medicines. Health-related quality of life (HRQoL) was assessed with the Migraine Disability Assessment, RAND's 36-Item Short Form Survey Instrument, 5-Level EuroQoL instrument (EQ-5D), Work Productivity and Activity Impairment General Health version, 9-Item Patient Health Questionnaire, and 7-Item Generalized Anxiety Disorder scale. Details about medication use and health care resource use (HCRU) were collected. Data were adjusted by inverse probability of treatment weighting and compared using two-sided two-sample <i>t</i>-tests or Chi-square tests.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Patients who had failed preventive treatments had poorer HRQoL, greater work productivity loss, greater nonwork activity impairment, and greater HCRU than patients who had never taken preventive treatments. The number of preventive-treatment failures scaled with disease burden. Patients with ≥2 treatment failures had significantly lower EQ-5D scores (0.69 vs 0.73) than those for prevention-naïve patients; patients with ≥2 treatment failures had significantly higher overall work productivity loss (45.9% vs 34.9%), activity impairment (46.8% vs 36.7%), and higher rates of emergency room visits (37.0% vs 25.2%), hospitalization (23.5% vs 12.3%), and neurologist visits (17.6 vs 10.9%) than those of prevention-naïve patients. Medication overuse rates were similar among patients with any treatment failures and prevention-naïve patients (migraine-specific: 34.4%-39.3%; overall: 59.2%-62.3%).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>US adults with frequent migraines who failed preventive treatments have significantly greater unmet needs and different acute medication use patterns than adults who never took treatments.</p>","PeriodicalId":22980,"journal":{"name":"Therapeutic Advances in Neurological Disorders","volume":"18 ","pages":"17562864251337431"},"PeriodicalIF":4.7,"publicationDate":"2025-06-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12146588/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144259001","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-06-05eCollection Date: 2025-01-01DOI: 10.1177/17562864251339895
Lihua Guan, Liling Lin, Chaochao Ma, Ling Qiu
Parkinson's disease (PD) is the second most common neurodegenerative disease, characterized by progressive worsening of motor symptoms. The primary pathological hallmark of PD is the degeneration of dopaminergic neurons in the substantia nigra and the presence of Lewy bodies, which are primarily composed of α-synuclein (α-syn) aggregates. Both α-syn and various neurotransmitters, including catecholamines (catechols), play crucial roles in the pathogenesis of PD, although the precise pathogenic mechanisms remain incompletely understood. The crosstalk between neurotransmitters and α-syn is intricate and multifaceted. Pathological α-syn disrupted neurotransmitters' homeostasis by impairing release and reuptake of neurotransmitters, with specific modulation of catecholaminergic and glutamatergic systems. Conversely, neurotransmitters, especially catechols, covalently modify α-syn. Such modifications significantly influence α-syn aggregation dynamics and alter its neurotoxic properties. However, determining whether these interactions induce synergistic toxicity or confer neuroprotection remains controversial. Emerging evidence suggests other neurotransmitters like serotonin and γ-aminobutyric acid may also modulate α-syn aggregation and PD progression, though their roles require further investigation. Understanding these interactions is crucial for developing novel diagnostic and multi-target therapeutic strategies.
{"title":"Decoding crosstalk between neurotransmitters and α-synuclein in Parkinson's disease: pathogenesis and therapeutic implications.","authors":"Lihua Guan, Liling Lin, Chaochao Ma, Ling Qiu","doi":"10.1177/17562864251339895","DOIUrl":"10.1177/17562864251339895","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Parkinson's disease (PD) is the second most common neurodegenerative disease, characterized by progressive worsening of motor symptoms. The primary pathological hallmark of PD is the degeneration of dopaminergic neurons in the substantia nigra and the presence of Lewy bodies, which are primarily composed of α-synuclein (α-syn) aggregates. Both α-syn and various neurotransmitters, including catecholamines (catechols), play crucial roles in the pathogenesis of PD, although the precise pathogenic mechanisms remain incompletely understood. The crosstalk between neurotransmitters and α-syn is intricate and multifaceted. Pathological α-syn disrupted neurotransmitters' homeostasis by impairing release and reuptake of neurotransmitters, with specific modulation of catecholaminergic and glutamatergic systems. Conversely, neurotransmitters, especially catechols, covalently modify α-syn. Such modifications significantly influence α-syn aggregation dynamics and alter its neurotoxic properties. However, determining whether these interactions induce synergistic toxicity or confer neuroprotection remains controversial. Emerging evidence suggests other neurotransmitters like serotonin and γ-aminobutyric acid may also modulate α-syn aggregation and PD progression, though their roles require further investigation. Understanding these interactions is crucial for developing novel diagnostic and multi-target therapeutic strategies.</p>","PeriodicalId":22980,"journal":{"name":"Therapeutic Advances in Neurological Disorders","volume":"18 ","pages":"17562864251339895"},"PeriodicalIF":4.7,"publicationDate":"2025-06-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12141805/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144249711","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-05-30eCollection Date: 2025-01-01DOI: 10.1177/17562864251332037
Sofia Marini, Silvia Falso, Federico Habetswallner, Martina Marini, Raffaele Iorio
Background: Standard management of generalized myasthenia gravis associated with anti-acetylcholine receptor autoantibodies (AChR-gMG) includes corticosteroids and nonsteroidal immunosuppressants. Complement inhibitors (CI) represent a more tailored therapeutic strategy. Real-world data on the steroid-sparing efficacy of CI remain limited.
Objective: To investigate the steroid-sparing efficacy of CI in AChR-gMG.
Design: We identified 69 AChR-gMG patients on corticosteroids treated with azathioprine (AZA), mycophenolate mofetil (MMF), or CI.
Methods: Steroid tapering was assessed by comparing corticosteroid dosage at several time-points to baseline.
Results: Steroids reductions were statistically significant for all therapies at every time point compared to baseline (all p < 0.001). Pairwise comparisons using the Mann-Whitney U test revealed significant differences between CI and MMF at 3 months (p = 0.0372), 6 months (p = 0.0193), and 9 months (p = 0.0321) and between CI and AZA at 6 months (p = 0.0415).
Conclusion: CI rapidly and effectively reduced corticosteroid dosage in most AChR-gMG patients, suggesting their potential role as steroid-sparing therapeutic options.
{"title":"Complement inhibitor therapy as a steroid-sparing strategy in generalized myasthenia gravis.","authors":"Sofia Marini, Silvia Falso, Federico Habetswallner, Martina Marini, Raffaele Iorio","doi":"10.1177/17562864251332037","DOIUrl":"10.1177/17562864251332037","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Standard management of generalized myasthenia gravis associated with anti-acetylcholine receptor autoantibodies (AChR-gMG) includes corticosteroids and nonsteroidal immunosuppressants. Complement inhibitors (CI) represent a more tailored therapeutic strategy. Real-world data on the steroid-sparing efficacy of CI remain limited.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To investigate the steroid-sparing efficacy of CI in AChR-gMG.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>We identified 69 AChR-gMG patients on corticosteroids treated with azathioprine (AZA), mycophenolate mofetil (MMF), or CI.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Steroid tapering was assessed by comparing corticosteroid dosage at several time-points to baseline.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Steroids reductions were statistically significant for all therapies at every time point compared to baseline (all <i>p</i> < 0.001). Pairwise comparisons using the Mann-Whitney <i>U</i> test revealed significant differences between CI and MMF at 3 months (<i>p</i> = 0.0372), 6 months (<i>p</i> = 0.0193), and 9 months (<i>p</i> = 0.0321) and between CI and AZA at 6 months (<i>p</i> = 0.0415).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>CI rapidly and effectively reduced corticosteroid dosage in most AChR-gMG patients, suggesting their potential role as steroid-sparing therapeutic options.</p>","PeriodicalId":22980,"journal":{"name":"Therapeutic Advances in Neurological Disorders","volume":"18 ","pages":"17562864251332037"},"PeriodicalIF":4.7,"publicationDate":"2025-05-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12126683/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144200077","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-05-26eCollection Date: 2025-01-01DOI: 10.1177/17562864251336903
Jon Rodríguez-Antigüedad, Gonzalo Olmedo-Saura, Javier Pagonabarraga, Saül Martínez-Horta, Jaime Kulisevsky
Neuropsychiatric symptoms in Parkinson's disease (PD) are highly prevalent and profoundly disabling, often emerging even before the onset of motor symptoms. As the disease progresses, these symptoms usually become increasingly impairing and are now recognized as having the greatest impact on quality of life not only for patients but also for caregivers. In recent years, there have been significant advances in the diagnosis and management of neuropsychiatric symptoms. However, there are still substantial gaps in therapeutic approaches and algorithms, with limited pharmacological and nonpharmacological treatment options currently available. One of the main reasons for this is the complex molecular and neural bases of these symptoms, which involve both dopaminergic and nondopaminergic neurotransmission systems and extend far beyond the nigrostriatal pathway. As a result, the drugs currently recommended for treating neuropsychiatric symptoms in PD are few and supported by limited evidence. In this context, the experience of the treating neurologist remains critical in selecting the most appropriate individualized therapy. The aim of this paper is to review the available therapeutic options and provide an overview of current research efforts, particularly those focusing on pharmacological treatments.
{"title":"Approaches for treating neuropsychiatric symptoms in Parkinson's disease: a narrative review.","authors":"Jon Rodríguez-Antigüedad, Gonzalo Olmedo-Saura, Javier Pagonabarraga, Saül Martínez-Horta, Jaime Kulisevsky","doi":"10.1177/17562864251336903","DOIUrl":"10.1177/17562864251336903","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Neuropsychiatric symptoms in Parkinson's disease (PD) are highly prevalent and profoundly disabling, often emerging even before the onset of motor symptoms. As the disease progresses, these symptoms usually become increasingly impairing and are now recognized as having the greatest impact on quality of life not only for patients but also for caregivers. In recent years, there have been significant advances in the diagnosis and management of neuropsychiatric symptoms. However, there are still substantial gaps in therapeutic approaches and algorithms, with limited pharmacological and nonpharmacological treatment options currently available. One of the main reasons for this is the complex molecular and neural bases of these symptoms, which involve both dopaminergic and nondopaminergic neurotransmission systems and extend far beyond the nigrostriatal pathway. As a result, the drugs currently recommended for treating neuropsychiatric symptoms in PD are few and supported by limited evidence. In this context, the experience of the treating neurologist remains critical in selecting the most appropriate individualized therapy. The aim of this paper is to review the available therapeutic options and provide an overview of current research efforts, particularly those focusing on pharmacological treatments.</p>","PeriodicalId":22980,"journal":{"name":"Therapeutic Advances in Neurological Disorders","volume":"18 ","pages":"17562864251336903"},"PeriodicalIF":4.7,"publicationDate":"2025-05-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12106999/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144161122","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-05-21eCollection Date: 2025-01-01DOI: 10.1177/17562864251321669
Maria-Ioanna Stefanou, Aikaterini Theodorou, Annerose Mengel, Konstantinos Melanis, Christos Bakirtzis, Vasileios Giannopapas, Dimitrios K Kitsos, Markus Kowarik, Katharina Feil, Dimitrios Tzanetakos, Vasiliki Zouvelou, Elizabeth Andreadou, John S Tzartos, Sotirios Giannopoulos, Georgios Tsivgoulis
Background: Epidemiological research indicates a heightened incidence of cerebrovascular disorders among patients with multiple sclerosis (MS).
Objectives: The aim of the present systematic review was to investigate the potential association between disease modifying therapies (DMTs) and the risk of stroke in MS patient populations.
Data sources and methods: A systematic literature search was performed in MEDLINE and SCOPUS databases up to April 6, 2024, to identify randomized-controlled clinical trials (RCT), registry-based and cohort-studies, case-series, and case-reports reporting on acute ischemic stroke (AIS) or intracerebral hemorrhage (ICH) in MS patients under different DMTs.
Results: Twenty-one studies were included: 1 RCT, 6 registry-based or cohort studies, 2 case-series and 11 case-reports. Overall, DMTs appear to reduce the risk of stroke in MS patients, with DMT exposure linked to a 50% reduction of the risk of stroke compared to no DMT exposure. Although glatiramer acetate and dimethyl fumarate appear to lower the risk of stroke, concerns about fingolimod exists due to an observed elevated risk for ischemic heart disease and hypertension. Despite the absence of detected safety concerns with alemtuzumab at the MS population level, alemtuzumab-related complications, although rare, signal the need for heightened clinical vigilance. Similarly, β-interferons have been linked to life-threatening adverse events, comprising thrombotic thrombocytopenic purpura-hemolytic uremic syndrome (TTP-HUS). No associations between the risk of stroke and other DMTs, comprising natalizumab and teriflunomide, were detected; yet, newly approved DMTs were underrepresented.
Conclusion: These findings highlight the importance of personalizing DMT selection and monitoring cardiovascular risk factors to reduce stroke risk in patients with MS.
{"title":"Risk of stroke under disease modifying therapies for multiple sclerosis: a systematic review.","authors":"Maria-Ioanna Stefanou, Aikaterini Theodorou, Annerose Mengel, Konstantinos Melanis, Christos Bakirtzis, Vasileios Giannopapas, Dimitrios K Kitsos, Markus Kowarik, Katharina Feil, Dimitrios Tzanetakos, Vasiliki Zouvelou, Elizabeth Andreadou, John S Tzartos, Sotirios Giannopoulos, Georgios Tsivgoulis","doi":"10.1177/17562864251321669","DOIUrl":"10.1177/17562864251321669","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Epidemiological research indicates a heightened incidence of cerebrovascular disorders among patients with multiple sclerosis (MS).</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>The aim of the present systematic review was to investigate the potential association between disease modifying therapies (DMTs) and the risk of stroke in MS patient populations.</p><p><strong>Data sources and methods: </strong>A systematic literature search was performed in MEDLINE and SCOPUS databases up to April 6, 2024, to identify randomized-controlled clinical trials (RCT), registry-based and cohort-studies, case-series, and case-reports reporting on acute ischemic stroke (AIS) or intracerebral hemorrhage (ICH) in MS patients under different DMTs.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Twenty-one studies were included: 1 RCT, 6 registry-based or cohort studies, 2 case-series and 11 case-reports. Overall, DMTs appear to reduce the risk of stroke in MS patients, with DMT exposure linked to a 50% reduction of the risk of stroke compared to no DMT exposure. Although glatiramer acetate and dimethyl fumarate appear to lower the risk of stroke, concerns about fingolimod exists due to an observed elevated risk for ischemic heart disease and hypertension. Despite the absence of detected safety concerns with alemtuzumab at the MS population level, alemtuzumab-related complications, although rare, signal the need for heightened clinical vigilance. Similarly, β-interferons have been linked to life-threatening adverse events, comprising thrombotic thrombocytopenic purpura-hemolytic uremic syndrome (TTP-HUS). No associations between the risk of stroke and other DMTs, comprising natalizumab and teriflunomide, were detected; yet, newly approved DMTs were underrepresented.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>These findings highlight the importance of personalizing DMT selection and monitoring cardiovascular risk factors to reduce stroke risk in patients with MS.</p><p><strong>Trial registration: </strong>PROSPERO CRD42024534470.</p>","PeriodicalId":22980,"journal":{"name":"Therapeutic Advances in Neurological Disorders","volume":"18 ","pages":"17562864251321669"},"PeriodicalIF":4.7,"publicationDate":"2025-05-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12099087/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144143578","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-05-11eCollection Date: 2025-01-01DOI: 10.1177/17562864251338675
Marta Waliszewska-Prosół, Marcin Straburzyński, Sławomir Budrewicz, Karol Marschollek, Magdalena Nowaczewska, Paweł Gać, Richard B Lipton
Background: The Migraine in Poland study is a cross-sectional survey that assesses symptomatology, consulting, diagnosis, treatment and impact of migraine in Poland.
Objectives: The purpose of this article is to define patterns of care for migraine in Polish patients.
Methods: The survey was conducted from August 2021 to June 2022. Participants were recruited through various channels, targeting mostly persons suffering from headaches. The web survey included questions allowing for diagnosis according to the International Classification of Headache Disorders. A detailed questionnaire evaluated healthcare system utilization, history of diagnosis, as well as the use of acute or preventive treatment, including non-pharmacological methods.
Results: In total, 3225 individuals aged 13-80 (mean age 38.9) responded to the questionnaire (87.1% were women). Migraine without aura (MwoA) diagnosis was confirmed in 1679 (52.7%) of subjects, and 1571 (93.6%) of them consulted a medical professional for their headaches in the past. Among those who consulted for headache, 91% reported having received a medical diagnosis of migraine. 92.5% of MwoA participants declared the current use of some form of treatment. Non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs and acetaminophen were the most frequently used acute medications (n = 1318, 78.5%) followed by combination analgesics, especially those containing codeine (n = 991, 59%). Triptans/ergots were used by 57.1%. A total of 22.8% of subjects used acute treatment with a frequency indicating medication-overuse. Prophylactic treatment was at some point used by 35.68%, while 11.49% were currently on preventive medications. The most frequently prescribed preventives were iprazochrome (8.99%), followed by flunarizine (8.10%) and topiramate (5.90%). A total of 23.28% subjects used nutraceuticals for migraine prevention (most frequently magnesium).
Conclusion: Despite high consultation and diagnosis rates among Polish patients with migraine, there is a need for improving standards of care, especially in regard to choice of treatment. There is also a need to raise public awareness of the dangers of codeine-based medications (available over-the-counter in Poland).
{"title":"Consulting, diagnosis and treatment patterns in migraine: results from the Migraine in Poland cross-sectional survey.","authors":"Marta Waliszewska-Prosół, Marcin Straburzyński, Sławomir Budrewicz, Karol Marschollek, Magdalena Nowaczewska, Paweł Gać, Richard B Lipton","doi":"10.1177/17562864251338675","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1177/17562864251338675","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The Migraine in Poland study is a cross-sectional survey that assesses symptomatology, consulting, diagnosis, treatment and impact of migraine in Poland.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>The purpose of this article is to define patterns of care for migraine in Polish patients.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The survey was conducted from August 2021 to June 2022. Participants were recruited through various channels, targeting mostly persons suffering from headaches. The web survey included questions allowing for diagnosis according to the International Classification of Headache Disorders. A detailed questionnaire evaluated healthcare system utilization, history of diagnosis, as well as the use of acute or preventive treatment, including non-pharmacological methods.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In total, 3225 individuals aged 13-80 (mean age 38.9) responded to the questionnaire (87.1% were women). Migraine without aura (MwoA) diagnosis was confirmed in 1679 (52.7%) of subjects, and 1571 (93.6%) of them consulted a medical professional for their headaches in the past. Among those who consulted for headache, 91% reported having received a medical diagnosis of migraine. 92.5% of MwoA participants declared the current use of some form of treatment. Non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs and acetaminophen were the most frequently used acute medications (<i>n</i> = 1318, 78.5%) followed by combination analgesics, especially those containing codeine (<i>n</i> = 991, 59%). Triptans/ergots were used by 57.1%. A total of 22.8% of subjects used acute treatment with a frequency indicating medication-overuse. Prophylactic treatment was at some point used by 35.68%, while 11.49% were currently on preventive medications. The most frequently prescribed preventives were iprazochrome (8.99%), followed by flunarizine (8.10%) and topiramate (5.90%). A total of 23.28% subjects used nutraceuticals for migraine prevention (most frequently magnesium).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Despite high consultation and diagnosis rates among Polish patients with migraine, there is a need for improving standards of care, especially in regard to choice of treatment. There is also a need to raise public awareness of the dangers of codeine-based medications (available over-the-counter in Poland).</p>","PeriodicalId":22980,"journal":{"name":"Therapeutic Advances in Neurological Disorders","volume":"18 ","pages":"17562864251338675"},"PeriodicalIF":4.7,"publicationDate":"2025-05-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12066855/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144011627","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-04-30eCollection Date: 2025-01-01DOI: 10.1177/17562864251332720
Federico De Santis, Eleonora De Matteis, Lucio D'Anna, Michele Romoli, Tiziana Tassinari, Valentina Saia, Silvia Cenciarelli, Chiara Bedetti, Chiara Padiglioni, Bruno Censori, Valentina Puglisi, Luisa Vinciguerra, Maria Guarino, Valentina Barone, Marialuisa Zedde, Ilaria Grisendi, Marina Diomedi, Maria Rosaria Bagnato, Marco Petruzzellis, Domenico Maria Mezzapesa, Vincenzo Inchingolo, Manuel Cappellari, Cecilia Zivelonghi, Paolo Candelaresi, Vincenzo Andreone, Giuseppe Rinaldi, Alessandra Bavaro, Anna Cavallini, Stefan Moraru, Maria Grazia Piscaglia, Valeria Terruso, Marina Mannino, Alessandro Pezzini, Giovanni Frisullo, Francesco Muscia, Maurizio Paciaroni, Maria Giulia Mosconi, Andrea Zini, Ruggiero Leone, Carmela Palmieri, Letizia Maria Cupini, Michela Marcon, Rossana Tassi, Enzo Sanzaro, Giulio Papiri, Giovanna Viticchi, Daniele Orsucci, Anne Falcou, Simone Beretta, Roberto Tarletti, Patrizia Nencini, Eugenia Rota, Federica Nicoletta Sepe, Delfina Ferrandi, Luigi Caputi, Gino Volpi, Salvatore La Spada, Mario Beccia, Claudia Rinaldi, Vincenzo Mastrangelo, Francesco Di Blasio, Paolo Invernizzi, Giuseppe Pelliccioni, Maria Vittoria De Angelis, Laura Bonanni, Giampietro Ruzza, Emanuele Alessandro Caggia, Monia Russo, Agnese Tonon, Maria Cristina Acciarri, Chiara Di Fino, Cinzia Roberti, Giovanni Manobianca, Gaspare Scaglione, Francesca Pistoia, Alberto Fortini, Antonella De Boni, Alessandra Sanna, Alberto Chiti, Marcella Caggiula, Maela Masato, Massimo Del Sette, Francesco Passarelli, Maria Roberta Bongioanni, Manuela De Michele, Stefano Ricci, Raffaele Ornello, Simona Sacco, Matteo Foschi
<p><strong>Background: </strong>Elevated baseline systolic blood pressure (SBP) was associated with poor outcomes following dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) in patients with non-cardioembolic minor ischemic stroke (MIS) or high-risk transient ischemic attack (TIA) in clinical trials.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>We aimed to assess the impact of admission SBP on the short-term outcomes after DAPT in patients with non-cardioembolic MIS or high-risk TIA.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We performed an inverse probability weighted (IPW) analysis from a prospective multicentric real-world study (READAPT) including patients with non-cardioembolic MIS (National Institute of Health Stroke Scale of 0-5) or high-risk TIA (ABCD2 ⩾4) who initiated DAPT within 48 h of symptom onset. The primary effectiveness outcome was the 90-day risk of new ischemic stroke or other vascular events. The secondary effectiveness outcomes were the 90-day modified Rankin Scale score ordinal shift, vascular and all-cause mortality, 24-h early neurological improvement or deterioration. The safety outcomes included the 90-day risk of moderate-to-severe and any bleedings, symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage, and 24-h hemorrhagic transformation. We used Cox proportional hazards regression with restricted cubic splines to model the continuous relationship between SBP and the hazard ratio (HR) of new vascular events. We selected SBP = 124 mm Hg as cut-off point for the IPW weighting. Outcomes were compared using Cox and generalized logistic regression analyses, adjusted for residual confounders.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>From 2278 patients in the READAPT cohort, we included 1291 MIS or high-risk TIAs (mean age 70.6 ± 11.4 years; 65.8% males). After IPW, patients with admission SBP ⩾124 mm Hg versus <124 mm Hg had a significantly higher risk of 90-day ischemic stroke or other vascular events (adjusted HR: 2.14 (95% CI 1.07%-4.98%); <i>p</i> = 0.033) and of 24-h early neurological deterioration (adjusted risk difference: 1.91% (95% CI 0.60%-3.41%); <i>p</i> = 0.006). The overall risk of safety outcomes was low, although patients with SBP ⩾124 mm Hg on admission showed higher rates of 90-day moderate-to-severe and any bleeding events (adjusted risk difference: 1.24% (95% CI 0.38%-2.14%); <i>p</i> = 0.004 and 6.18% (95% CI 4.19%-8.16%); <i>p</i> < 0.001; respectively), as well as of 24-h hemorrhagic transformation (adjusted risk difference: 1.57% (95% CI 0.60%-2.55%); <i>p</i> = 0.001). Subgroup analysis showed a significant interaction between admission SBP, sex, and time to DAPT start in predicting 90-day new vascular events (<i>p</i> for interaction <0.001 and 0.007, respectively).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>In patients with non-cardioembolic MIS or high-risk TIA, higher levels of admission SBP may be associated with an increased risk of new vascular events, early neurological deterioration, and bleeding after DAPT use. Future studies should further investigate if op
背景:在临床试验中,非心源性轻微缺血性卒中(MIS)或高风险短暂性脑缺血发作(TIA)患者接受双重抗血小板治疗(DAPT)后,基线收缩压(SBP)升高与预后不良相关。目的:我们旨在评估入院收缩压对非心源性MIS或高风险TIA患者DAPT后短期预后的影响。方法:我们从一项前瞻性多中心现实世界研究(READAPT)中进行了逆概率加权(IPW)分析,该研究包括在症状发作48小时内启动DAPT的非心脏栓塞性MIS(国家健康研究所卒中量表0-5)或高风险TIA (ABCD2大于或等于4)患者。主要疗效指标是90天内新发缺血性卒中或其他血管事件的风险。次要疗效指标为90天改良兰金量表评分顺序偏移、血管和全因死亡率、24小时早期神经系统改善或恶化。安全性指标包括90天中度至重度出血和任何出血风险、症状性颅内出血和24小时出血转化。我们使用限制三次样条的Cox比例风险回归来模拟收缩压与新血管事件风险比(HR)之间的连续关系。我们选择收缩压= 124 mm Hg作为IPW加权的分界点。采用Cox和广义逻辑回归分析对结果进行比较,并对残留混杂因素进行校正。结果:在READAPT队列的2278例患者中,我们纳入了1291例MIS或高风险tia(平均年龄70.6±11.4岁;65.8%的男性)。在IPW后,收缩压小于或等于124 mm Hg的患者(p = 0.033)和24小时早期神经系统恶化的患者(调整后的风险差异:1.91% (95% CI 0.60%-3.41%);p = 0.006)。安全结局的总体风险很低,尽管收缩压小于124 mm Hg的患者在入院时显示出90天中重度出血事件和任何出血事件的发生率更高(调整后的风险差异:1.24% (95% CI 0.38%-2.14%);p = 0.004和6.18% (95% CI 4.19%-8.16%);p = 0.001)。亚组分析显示,入院收缩压、性别和DAPT开始时间在预测90天新血管事件方面存在显著的相互作用(相互作用p)。结论:在非心源性MIS或高风险TIA患者中,较高的入院收缩压水平可能与DAPT使用后新血管事件、早期神经系统恶化和出血的风险增加有关。未来的研究应进一步研究优化血压管理是否可以进一步改善预后。
{"title":"Admission systolic blood pressure and short-term outcomes after dual antiplatelet therapy in patients with minor ischemic stroke or transient ischemic attack.","authors":"Federico De Santis, Eleonora De Matteis, Lucio D'Anna, Michele Romoli, Tiziana Tassinari, Valentina Saia, Silvia Cenciarelli, Chiara Bedetti, Chiara Padiglioni, Bruno Censori, Valentina Puglisi, Luisa Vinciguerra, Maria Guarino, Valentina Barone, Marialuisa Zedde, Ilaria Grisendi, Marina Diomedi, Maria Rosaria Bagnato, Marco Petruzzellis, Domenico Maria Mezzapesa, Vincenzo Inchingolo, Manuel Cappellari, Cecilia Zivelonghi, Paolo Candelaresi, Vincenzo Andreone, Giuseppe Rinaldi, Alessandra Bavaro, Anna Cavallini, Stefan Moraru, Maria Grazia Piscaglia, Valeria Terruso, Marina Mannino, Alessandro Pezzini, Giovanni Frisullo, Francesco Muscia, Maurizio Paciaroni, Maria Giulia Mosconi, Andrea Zini, Ruggiero Leone, Carmela Palmieri, Letizia Maria Cupini, Michela Marcon, Rossana Tassi, Enzo Sanzaro, Giulio Papiri, Giovanna Viticchi, Daniele Orsucci, Anne Falcou, Simone Beretta, Roberto Tarletti, Patrizia Nencini, Eugenia Rota, Federica Nicoletta Sepe, Delfina Ferrandi, Luigi Caputi, Gino Volpi, Salvatore La Spada, Mario Beccia, Claudia Rinaldi, Vincenzo Mastrangelo, Francesco Di Blasio, Paolo Invernizzi, Giuseppe Pelliccioni, Maria Vittoria De Angelis, Laura Bonanni, Giampietro Ruzza, Emanuele Alessandro Caggia, Monia Russo, Agnese Tonon, Maria Cristina Acciarri, Chiara Di Fino, Cinzia Roberti, Giovanni Manobianca, Gaspare Scaglione, Francesca Pistoia, Alberto Fortini, Antonella De Boni, Alessandra Sanna, Alberto Chiti, Marcella Caggiula, Maela Masato, Massimo Del Sette, Francesco Passarelli, Maria Roberta Bongioanni, Manuela De Michele, Stefano Ricci, Raffaele Ornello, Simona Sacco, Matteo Foschi","doi":"10.1177/17562864251332720","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1177/17562864251332720","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Elevated baseline systolic blood pressure (SBP) was associated with poor outcomes following dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) in patients with non-cardioembolic minor ischemic stroke (MIS) or high-risk transient ischemic attack (TIA) in clinical trials.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>We aimed to assess the impact of admission SBP on the short-term outcomes after DAPT in patients with non-cardioembolic MIS or high-risk TIA.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We performed an inverse probability weighted (IPW) analysis from a prospective multicentric real-world study (READAPT) including patients with non-cardioembolic MIS (National Institute of Health Stroke Scale of 0-5) or high-risk TIA (ABCD2 ⩾4) who initiated DAPT within 48 h of symptom onset. The primary effectiveness outcome was the 90-day risk of new ischemic stroke or other vascular events. The secondary effectiveness outcomes were the 90-day modified Rankin Scale score ordinal shift, vascular and all-cause mortality, 24-h early neurological improvement or deterioration. The safety outcomes included the 90-day risk of moderate-to-severe and any bleedings, symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage, and 24-h hemorrhagic transformation. We used Cox proportional hazards regression with restricted cubic splines to model the continuous relationship between SBP and the hazard ratio (HR) of new vascular events. We selected SBP = 124 mm Hg as cut-off point for the IPW weighting. Outcomes were compared using Cox and generalized logistic regression analyses, adjusted for residual confounders.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>From 2278 patients in the READAPT cohort, we included 1291 MIS or high-risk TIAs (mean age 70.6 ± 11.4 years; 65.8% males). After IPW, patients with admission SBP ⩾124 mm Hg versus <124 mm Hg had a significantly higher risk of 90-day ischemic stroke or other vascular events (adjusted HR: 2.14 (95% CI 1.07%-4.98%); <i>p</i> = 0.033) and of 24-h early neurological deterioration (adjusted risk difference: 1.91% (95% CI 0.60%-3.41%); <i>p</i> = 0.006). The overall risk of safety outcomes was low, although patients with SBP ⩾124 mm Hg on admission showed higher rates of 90-day moderate-to-severe and any bleeding events (adjusted risk difference: 1.24% (95% CI 0.38%-2.14%); <i>p</i> = 0.004 and 6.18% (95% CI 4.19%-8.16%); <i>p</i> < 0.001; respectively), as well as of 24-h hemorrhagic transformation (adjusted risk difference: 1.57% (95% CI 0.60%-2.55%); <i>p</i> = 0.001). Subgroup analysis showed a significant interaction between admission SBP, sex, and time to DAPT start in predicting 90-day new vascular events (<i>p</i> for interaction <0.001 and 0.007, respectively).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>In patients with non-cardioembolic MIS or high-risk TIA, higher levels of admission SBP may be associated with an increased risk of new vascular events, early neurological deterioration, and bleeding after DAPT use. Future studies should further investigate if op","PeriodicalId":22980,"journal":{"name":"Therapeutic Advances in Neurological Disorders","volume":"18 ","pages":"17562864251332720"},"PeriodicalIF":4.7,"publicationDate":"2025-04-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12046176/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143998842","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}