Pub Date : 2023-04-01DOI: 10.1177/01926233231168133
Renee R Hukkanen, Michelle Trapani, Tana Derringer, Victoria Laast, Zbigniew W Wojcinski, Rosa Anna Manno, Matthias Rinke, Eric van Esch, Alys E Bradley, Patrizia Cristofori, Roger Alison, Barb Munch
Toxicologic/veterinary pathologists are working remotely from Good Laboratory Practice (GLP) test facilities (TFs) in increasing numbers, most commonly in home-office settings. A study pathologist (SP) generating data on GLP-compliant nonclinical studies must be keenly aware of applicable national GLP regulations and comply with TF and protocol requirements. This Toxicological Pathology Forum Opinion Piece will summarize primary areas of emphasis for the SP generating GLP data using glass slides. Peer review and digital review of whole slide images are out of scope for this opinion piece. Key GLP considerations for primary pathology on glass slides are discussed with respect to SP location and employment status, including pathologist qualifications, specimen management, facilities, equipment, archive, and quality assurance. Notable differences between national GLP regulations of the United States, the United Kingdom, Germany, the Netherlands, France, Ireland, Switzerland, Italy, and Israel are presented. With the understanding that each combination of location and employment is unique, the authors provide a general overview of considerations for successful remote GLP work.
{"title":"Toxicologic Pathology Forum: Opinion on Performing Good Laboratory Practice Histopathology Evaluation for Nonclinical Toxicity Studies in a Remote Location.","authors":"Renee R Hukkanen, Michelle Trapani, Tana Derringer, Victoria Laast, Zbigniew W Wojcinski, Rosa Anna Manno, Matthias Rinke, Eric van Esch, Alys E Bradley, Patrizia Cristofori, Roger Alison, Barb Munch","doi":"10.1177/01926233231168133","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1177/01926233231168133","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Toxicologic/veterinary pathologists are working remotely from Good Laboratory Practice (GLP) test facilities (TFs) in increasing numbers, most commonly in home-office settings. A study pathologist (SP) generating data on GLP-compliant nonclinical studies must be keenly aware of applicable national GLP regulations and comply with TF and protocol requirements. This Toxicological Pathology Forum Opinion Piece will summarize primary areas of emphasis for the SP generating GLP data using glass slides. Peer review and digital review of whole slide images are out of scope for this opinion piece. Key GLP considerations for primary pathology on glass slides are discussed with respect to SP location and employment status, including pathologist qualifications, specimen management, facilities, equipment, archive, and quality assurance. Notable differences between national GLP regulations of the United States, the United Kingdom, Germany, the Netherlands, France, Ireland, Switzerland, Italy, and Israel are presented. With the understanding that each combination of location and employment is unique, the authors provide a general overview of considerations for successful remote GLP work.</p>","PeriodicalId":23113,"journal":{"name":"Toxicologic Pathology","volume":"51 3","pages":"148-152"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5,"publicationDate":"2023-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"10187235","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2023-04-01DOI: 10.1177/01926233231175051
Figure 45. Example of twinning with a fused placenta at E15.5. A, Gross image of twin embryos sharing a fused placenta. The embryo shown on the right is slightly smaller and paler than its counterpart on the left. B, Low magnification of twin embryos sharing a fused placenta supporting two sets of umbilical arteries (UA). C, Higher magnification of fused placenta and separate uterine arteries with a clear border (arrows) between the two placentas where there is junctional zone fusion. Note the disorganization of the placenta associated with the right embryo. Intertwin growth discrepancy is a common finding and is likely due to differential nutrient exchange, oxygen supply, and waste removal within the respective placentas.
{"title":"Corrigendum to Histology Atlas of the Developing Mouse Placenta.","authors":"","doi":"10.1177/01926233231175051","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1177/01926233231175051","url":null,"abstract":"Figure 45. Example of twinning with a fused placenta at E15.5. A, Gross image of twin embryos sharing a fused placenta. The embryo shown on the right is slightly smaller and paler than its counterpart on the left. B, Low magnification of twin embryos sharing a fused placenta supporting two sets of umbilical arteries (UA). C, Higher magnification of fused placenta and separate uterine arteries with a clear border (arrows) between the two placentas where there is junctional zone fusion. Note the disorganization of the placenta associated with the right embryo. Intertwin growth discrepancy is a common finding and is likely due to differential nutrient exchange, oxygen supply, and waste removal within the respective placentas.","PeriodicalId":23113,"journal":{"name":"Toxicologic Pathology","volume":"51 3","pages":"153"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5,"publicationDate":"2023-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"10385552","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2023-01-01Epub Date: 2023-04-21DOI: 10.1177/01926233231163474
Rani S Sellers
Nonclinical toxicity testing (GLP) of prophylactic vaccines to support human clinical trials is outlined in the World Health Organization nonclinical vaccine-development guidelines, which are followed by most regulatory agencies globally. Vaccine GLP toxicity studies include at least two groups: a buffer control (often phosphate-buffered saline) group and a highest anticipated clinical dose formulation group. However, studies may include additional groups, including lower-dose formulation groups and adjuvant-containing formulation control groups. World Health Organization guidelines touch upon expectations for dose group and tissue selection for microscopic evaluation, but there is variation in the interpretation of this aspect of these guidelines between vaccine developers. This opinion piece proposes a scientifically based approach for defining appropriate groups to evaluate in the dosing and recovery phases in nonclinical vaccine toxicity studies, as well as suggestions on selecting tissues for microscopic evaluation at the recovery phase of studies to promote alignment between vaccine manufacturers.
{"title":"Toxicologic Pathology Forum: Tissue Evaluation in Nonclinical Toxicity Studies for Prophylactic Vaccines.","authors":"Rani S Sellers","doi":"10.1177/01926233231163474","DOIUrl":"10.1177/01926233231163474","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Nonclinical toxicity testing (GLP) of prophylactic vaccines to support human clinical trials is outlined in the World Health Organization nonclinical vaccine-development guidelines, which are followed by most regulatory agencies globally. Vaccine GLP toxicity studies include at least two groups: a buffer control (often phosphate-buffered saline) group and a highest anticipated clinical dose formulation group. However, studies may include additional groups, including lower-dose formulation groups and adjuvant-containing formulation control groups. World Health Organization guidelines touch upon expectations for dose group and tissue selection for microscopic evaluation, but there is variation in the interpretation of this aspect of these guidelines between vaccine developers. This opinion piece proposes a scientifically based approach for defining appropriate groups to evaluate in the dosing and recovery phases in nonclinical vaccine toxicity studies, as well as suggestions on selecting tissues for microscopic evaluation at the recovery phase of studies to promote alignment between vaccine manufacturers.</p>","PeriodicalId":23113,"journal":{"name":"Toxicologic Pathology","volume":"51 1-2","pages":"77-80"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/d5/e2/10.1177_01926233231163474.PMC10278378.pdf","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"9670396","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2023-01-01DOI: 10.1177/01926233231156614
B. Bolon
At first glance, publication of a book review on a tome dedicated to introducing major toxicologic pathology concepts to non-pathologists in a journal focused on the professional practice of toxicologic pathology would seem to be a pointless endeavor. Nothing could be further from the truth. This concise volume (892 pp [plus 27 pp for index] for the hardcover offering) offers a succinct introduction to many key topics in the field. While designed to edify toxicologists, regulatory reviewers, and basic investigators, Toxicologic Pathology for Non-Pathologists harbors much of value for toxicologic pathologists at all levels, from novice to expert. The text is framed in 20 chapters arranged to provide an orderly tutorial in the field. Each chapter has been written by one or more recognized subject matter experts for that topic, most of whom built their toxicologic pathology careers through long stints in contract research organizations, industry, research laboratories (academic or government), and/or consulting. Chapters possess a wealth of fundamental information, images, and tables as well as bibliographies designed to provide a relevant set of additional readings on that topic. The scope is broad, covering basic pathology practices (4 chapters), key organ systems (13 chapters), and several special problems (3 chapters). A thorough reading of this book will greatly speed the professional development of entry-level toxicologic pathologists while the numerous figures and tables will allow more experienced practitioners to better communicate with non-pathologist team members. The 4 chapters on basic pathology practices afford a masterful introduction to the field. Chapter 1 (“Introduction to Toxicologic Pathology”) paired with Chapter 3 (“Routine and Special Techniques in Toxicologic Pathology”) ably define expected qualifications of toxicologic pathologists, the tools they employ in tissue collection and analysis (focusing on structural [anatomic pathology] methods including in situ chemical and molecular procedures), and principal challenges in data generation (e.g., severity grading) and interpretation (e.g., adversity decisions). Chapter 17 (“Principles of Toxicologic Clinical Pathology”) covers similar considerations as they apply to analysis of cell and fluid samples, emphasizing the impact of such factors as animal species, husbandry, and study design parameters on the quality of the final data set. Chapter 2 (“The Pathology Report, Peer Review, and Pathology Working Group”) effectively addresses the elements that need to be included, or at least pondered, in preparing an accurate, brief, and clear pathology report. Such documents are the raison d'être for the toxicologic pathology role on a study team, and Chapter 2 readily outlines basic findings, their implications, and means of producing the best possible report. The 13 organ system chapters are abridged but nevertheless valuable synopses of major toxicologic pathology information for each
{"title":"Book Review: Toxicologic Pathology for Non-Pathologists","authors":"B. Bolon","doi":"10.1177/01926233231156614","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1177/01926233231156614","url":null,"abstract":"At first glance, publication of a book review on a tome dedicated to introducing major toxicologic pathology concepts to non-pathologists in a journal focused on the professional practice of toxicologic pathology would seem to be a pointless endeavor. Nothing could be further from the truth. This concise volume (892 pp [plus 27 pp for index] for the hardcover offering) offers a succinct introduction to many key topics in the field. While designed to edify toxicologists, regulatory reviewers, and basic investigators, Toxicologic Pathology for Non-Pathologists harbors much of value for toxicologic pathologists at all levels, from novice to expert. The text is framed in 20 chapters arranged to provide an orderly tutorial in the field. Each chapter has been written by one or more recognized subject matter experts for that topic, most of whom built their toxicologic pathology careers through long stints in contract research organizations, industry, research laboratories (academic or government), and/or consulting. Chapters possess a wealth of fundamental information, images, and tables as well as bibliographies designed to provide a relevant set of additional readings on that topic. The scope is broad, covering basic pathology practices (4 chapters), key organ systems (13 chapters), and several special problems (3 chapters). A thorough reading of this book will greatly speed the professional development of entry-level toxicologic pathologists while the numerous figures and tables will allow more experienced practitioners to better communicate with non-pathologist team members. The 4 chapters on basic pathology practices afford a masterful introduction to the field. Chapter 1 (“Introduction to Toxicologic Pathology”) paired with Chapter 3 (“Routine and Special Techniques in Toxicologic Pathology”) ably define expected qualifications of toxicologic pathologists, the tools they employ in tissue collection and analysis (focusing on structural [anatomic pathology] methods including in situ chemical and molecular procedures), and principal challenges in data generation (e.g., severity grading) and interpretation (e.g., adversity decisions). Chapter 17 (“Principles of Toxicologic Clinical Pathology”) covers similar considerations as they apply to analysis of cell and fluid samples, emphasizing the impact of such factors as animal species, husbandry, and study design parameters on the quality of the final data set. Chapter 2 (“The Pathology Report, Peer Review, and Pathology Working Group”) effectively addresses the elements that need to be included, or at least pondered, in preparing an accurate, brief, and clear pathology report. Such documents are the raison d'être for the toxicologic pathology role on a study team, and Chapter 2 readily outlines basic findings, their implications, and means of producing the best possible report. The 13 organ system chapters are abridged but nevertheless valuable synopses of major toxicologic pathology information for each","PeriodicalId":23113,"journal":{"name":"Toxicologic Pathology","volume":"75 1","pages":"87 - 88"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"74183820","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2023-01-01Epub Date: 2023-02-01DOI: 10.1177/01926233221148393
Laine E Feller, Aaron Sargeant, E J Ehrhart, Bethany Balmer, Keith Nelson, Jennifer Lamoureux
Göttingen minipigs are increasingly used as an alternative large animal model in nonclinical toxicology studies, and proliferative lesions in this species are rare. Here, we report four cases of cardiac rhabdomyoma in Göttingen minipigs, an incidental and benign mass in the heart. Three cases lacked gross observations and had a microscopic nodule in either the left ventricle or interventricular septum. The last case had a large, firm, raised nodule on a left ventricular papillary muscle noted at necropsy, with additional microscopic intramural masses in the left ventricular wall. In all cases, microscopic evaluation revealed well-circumscribed, expansile nodules composed of bundles of large, highly vacuolated, ovoid to polygonal cells with variable cytoplasmic processes radiating from a centrally located nucleus. Cells displayed patchy accumulation of intracytoplasmic, PAS-positive material and haphazardly arranged cytoplasmic cross-striations. There was no evidence of cardiac insufficiency or other data to suggest the masses were clinically meaningful. Cardiac rhabdomyomas have been reported in meat-hybrid swine, with a breed predisposition in red wattle. This lesion is well established in guinea pigs, but documentation in other laboratory species used in toxicologic studies is limited to two beagle dogs. To our knowledge, this is the first report of spontaneous cardiac rhabdomyoma in Göttingen minipigs.
哥廷根小型猪越来越多地被用作非临床毒理学研究中的另一种大型动物模型,但这种动物的增殖性病变却很少见。在此,我们报告了四例哥廷根小型猪心脏横纹肌瘤病例,这是心脏中偶然出现的良性肿块。其中三例缺乏大体观察,在左心室或室间隔有一个显微结节。最后一个病例在尸检时发现左心室乳头肌上有一个大的、坚硬的、凸起的结节,左心室壁上还有一些微小的壁内肿块。在所有病例中,显微镜下的评估结果均显示出圆形、膨胀性结节,由成束的大型、高度空泡化、卵圆形至多角形细胞组成,这些细胞具有从位于中心的细胞核放射出的不同胞质过程。细胞胞质内有斑点状的 PAS 阳性物质堆积,胞质交叉条纹杂乱无章。没有心功能不全的证据,也没有其他数据表明肿块具有临床意义。据报道,肉用杂交猪中也有心脏横纹肌瘤,红山毛榉猪的品种易患这种疾病。这种病变在豚鼠中已得到证实,但在毒理学研究中使用的其他实验室物种中的记录仅限于两只小猎犬。据我们所知,这是第一份关于哥廷根小型猪自发性心脏横纹肌瘤的报告。
{"title":"Cardiac Rhabdomyoma in Four Göttingen Minipigs.","authors":"Laine E Feller, Aaron Sargeant, E J Ehrhart, Bethany Balmer, Keith Nelson, Jennifer Lamoureux","doi":"10.1177/01926233221148393","DOIUrl":"10.1177/01926233221148393","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Göttingen minipigs are increasingly used as an alternative large animal model in nonclinical toxicology studies, and proliferative lesions in this species are rare. Here, we report four cases of cardiac rhabdomyoma in Göttingen minipigs, an incidental and benign mass in the heart. Three cases lacked gross observations and had a microscopic nodule in either the left ventricle or interventricular septum. The last case had a large, firm, raised nodule on a left ventricular papillary muscle noted at necropsy, with additional microscopic intramural masses in the left ventricular wall. In all cases, microscopic evaluation revealed well-circumscribed, expansile nodules composed of bundles of large, highly vacuolated, ovoid to polygonal cells with variable cytoplasmic processes radiating from a centrally located nucleus. Cells displayed patchy accumulation of intracytoplasmic, PAS-positive material and haphazardly arranged cytoplasmic cross-striations. There was no evidence of cardiac insufficiency or other data to suggest the masses were clinically meaningful. Cardiac rhabdomyomas have been reported in meat-hybrid swine, with a breed predisposition in red wattle. This lesion is well established in guinea pigs, but documentation in other laboratory species used in toxicologic studies is limited to two beagle dogs. To our knowledge, this is the first report of spontaneous cardiac rhabdomyoma in Göttingen minipigs.</p>","PeriodicalId":23113,"journal":{"name":"Toxicologic Pathology","volume":"51 1-2","pages":"61-66"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"9645411","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2023-01-01Epub Date: 2023-04-14DOI: 10.1177/01926233231164557
Brad Bolon
Gliosis, defined as a nonneoplastic reaction (hypertrophy and/or proliferation) of astrocytes and/or microglial cells, is a frequent finding in the central nervous system (CNS [brain and/or spinal cord]) in nonclinical safety studies. Gliosis in rodents and nonrodents occurs at low incidence as a spontaneous finding and is induced by various test articles (e.g., biomolecules, cell and gene therapies, small molecules) delivered centrally (i.e., by injection or infusion into cerebrospinal fluid or neural tissue) or systemically. Several CNS gliosis patterns occur in nonclinical species. First, gliosis may accompany degeneration and/or necrosis of cells (mainly neurons) or neural parenchyma (neuron processes and myelin). Second, gliosis often follows inflammation (i.e., leukocyte accumulation causing parenchymal damage) or neoplasm formation. Third, gliosis may appear as variably sized, randomly scattered foci of reactive glial cells in the absence of visible parenchymal damage or inflammation. In interpreting test article-related CNS gliosis, adversity is indicated by parenchymal injury (e.g., degeneration, necrosis, or inflammation) and not the mere existence of a glial reaction. In the absence of clear structural damage to the parenchyma, gliosis as a standalone CNS finding should be interpreted as a nonadverse reaction to regional alterations in microenvironmental conditions rather than as evidence of a glial reaction associated with neurotoxicity.
{"title":"Toxicologic Pathology Forum Opinion: Interpretation of Gliosis in the Brain and Spinal Cord Observed During Nonclinical Safety Studies.","authors":"Brad Bolon","doi":"10.1177/01926233231164557","DOIUrl":"10.1177/01926233231164557","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Gliosis, defined as a nonneoplastic reaction (hypertrophy and/or proliferation) of astrocytes and/or microglial cells, is a frequent finding in the central nervous system (CNS [brain and/or spinal cord]) in nonclinical safety studies. Gliosis in rodents and nonrodents occurs at low incidence as a spontaneous finding and is induced by various test articles (e.g., biomolecules, cell and gene therapies, small molecules) delivered centrally (i.e., by injection or infusion into cerebrospinal fluid or neural tissue) or systemically. Several CNS gliosis patterns occur in nonclinical species. First, gliosis may accompany degeneration and/or necrosis of cells (mainly neurons) or neural parenchyma (neuron processes and myelin). Second, gliosis often follows inflammation (i.e., leukocyte accumulation causing parenchymal damage) or neoplasm formation. Third, gliosis may appear as variably sized, randomly scattered foci of reactive glial cells in the absence of visible parenchymal damage or inflammation. In interpreting test article-related CNS gliosis, adversity is indicated by parenchymal injury (e.g., degeneration, necrosis, or inflammation) and not the mere existence of a glial reaction. In the absence of clear structural damage to the parenchyma, gliosis as a standalone CNS finding should be interpreted as a nonadverse reaction to regional alterations in microenvironmental conditions rather than as evidence of a glial reaction associated with neurotoxicity.</p>","PeriodicalId":23113,"journal":{"name":"Toxicologic Pathology","volume":"51 1-2","pages":"68-76"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"9647167","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2023-01-01Epub Date: 2023-04-26DOI: 10.1177/01926233231164097
Kerstin Wäse, Thomas Bartels, Uwe Schwahn, Mostafa Kabiri
Fibroblast growth factor 21 (FGF21) and FGF15/FGF19 belong to the same subgroup of FGFs and are believed to have therapeutic potential in the treatment of type 2 diabetes and associated metabolic dysfunctionalities and pathological conditions. FGF19 has been proposed to induce hyperplasia and liver tumors in FVB mice (named after its susceptibility to Friend leukemia virus B), mediated by the FGF receptor 4 (FGFR4). The goal of this work was to investigate whether FGF21 might also have a potential proliferative effect mediated via FGFR4 using liver-specific Fgfr4 knockout (KO) mice. We conducted a mechanistic 7-day study involving female Fgfr4 fl/fl and Fgfr4 KO mice with a treatment regimen of twice daily or daily subcutaneous injections of FGF21 or FGF19 (positive control), respectively. The Ki-67 liver labeling index (LI) was evaluated by a semi-automated bioimaging analysis. The results showed a statistically significant increase in FGF21- and FGF19-treated Fgfr4 fl/fl mice. Interestingly, in Fgfr4 KO mice, this effect was absent following both treatments of FGF19 and FGF21, indicating that not only the FGFR4 receptor is pivotal for the mediation of hepatocellular proliferation by FGF19 leading finally to liver tumors but it seems also that FGFR4/FGF21 signaling has an impact on the hepatocellular proliferative activity, which does not promote the formation of hepatocellular liver tumors based on the current knowledge.
{"title":"Investigation of the Proliferative Potential of FGF21 or FGF19 in Liver-Specific FGFR4-Deficient Mice.","authors":"Kerstin Wäse, Thomas Bartels, Uwe Schwahn, Mostafa Kabiri","doi":"10.1177/01926233231164097","DOIUrl":"10.1177/01926233231164097","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Fibroblast growth factor 21 (FGF21) and FGF15/FGF19 belong to the same subgroup of FGFs and are believed to have therapeutic potential in the treatment of type 2 diabetes and associated metabolic dysfunctionalities and pathological conditions. FGF19 has been proposed to induce hyperplasia and liver tumors in FVB mice (named after its susceptibility to Friend leukemia virus B), mediated by the FGF receptor 4 (FGFR4). The goal of this work was to investigate whether FGF21 might also have a potential proliferative effect mediated via FGFR4 using liver-specific <i>Fgfr4</i> knockout (KO) mice. We conducted a mechanistic 7-day study involving female <i>Fgfr4</i> fl/fl and <i>Fgfr4</i> KO mice with a treatment regimen of twice daily or daily subcutaneous injections of FGF21 or FGF19 (positive control), respectively. The Ki-67 liver labeling index (LI) was evaluated by a semi-automated bioimaging analysis. The results showed a statistically significant increase in FGF21- and FGF19-treated <i>Fgfr4</i> fl/fl mice. Interestingly, in <i>Fgfr4</i> KO mice, this effect was absent following both treatments of FGF19 and FGF21, indicating that not only the FGFR4 receptor is pivotal for the mediation of hepatocellular proliferation by FGF19 leading finally to liver tumors but it seems also that FGFR4/FGF21 signaling has an impact on the hepatocellular proliferative activity, which does not promote the formation of hepatocellular liver tumors based on the current knowledge.</p>","PeriodicalId":23113,"journal":{"name":"Toxicologic Pathology","volume":"51 1-2","pages":"27-38"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"9650358","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2023-01-01Epub Date: 2023-05-09DOI: 10.1177/01926233231168836
Heather Kowalski, Debie Hoivik, Michael Rabinowitz
Vadadustat is an investigational oral hypoxia-inducible factor (HIF) prolyl-4-hydroxylase inhibitor to treat anemia due to chronic kidney disease (CKD). Some studies suggest that HIF activation promotes tumorigenesis by activating angiogenesis downstream of vascular endothelial growth factor, while other studies suggest that elevated HIF activity may produce an antitumor phenotype. To evaluate the potential carcinogenicity of vadadustat in mice and rats, we dosed CByB6F1/Tg.rasH2 hemizygous (transgenic) mice orally by gavage with 5 to 50 mg/kg/d of vadadustat for 6 months and dosed Sprague-Dawley rats orally by gavage with 2 to 20 mg/kg/d for approximately 85 weeks. Doses were selected based on the maximally tolerated dose established for each species in previous studies. The tumors that were identified in the studies were not considered to be treatment-related for statistical reasons or within the historical control range. There was no carcinogenic effect attributed to vadadustat in mice or rats.
{"title":"Assessing the Carcinogenicity of Vadadustat, an Oral Hypoxia-Inducible Factor Prolyl-4-Hydroxylase Inhibitor, in Rodents.","authors":"Heather Kowalski, Debie Hoivik, Michael Rabinowitz","doi":"10.1177/01926233231168836","DOIUrl":"10.1177/01926233231168836","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Vadadustat is an investigational oral hypoxia-inducible factor (HIF) prolyl-4-hydroxylase inhibitor to treat anemia due to chronic kidney disease (CKD). Some studies suggest that HIF activation promotes tumorigenesis by activating angiogenesis downstream of vascular endothelial growth factor, while other studies suggest that elevated HIF activity may produce an antitumor phenotype. To evaluate the potential carcinogenicity of vadadustat in mice and rats, we dosed CByB6F1/Tg.rasH2 hemizygous (transgenic) mice orally by gavage with 5 to 50 mg/kg/d of vadadustat for 6 months and dosed Sprague-Dawley rats orally by gavage with 2 to 20 mg/kg/d for approximately 85 weeks. Doses were selected based on the maximally tolerated dose established for each species in previous studies. The tumors that were identified in the studies were not considered to be treatment-related for statistical reasons or within the historical control range. There was no carcinogenic effect attributed to vadadustat in mice or rats.</p>","PeriodicalId":23113,"journal":{"name":"Toxicologic Pathology","volume":"51 1-2","pages":"56-60"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/28/16/10.1177_01926233231168836.PMC10278385.pdf","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"9720991","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2023-01-01Epub Date: 2023-04-03DOI: 10.1177/01926233231157322
Thai-Vu T Ton, Hue-Hua L Hong, Ramesh C Kovi, Keith R Shockley, Shyamal D Peddada, Kevin E Gerrish, Kyathanahalli S Janardhan, Gordon Flake, Mathew D Stout, Robert C Sills, Arun R Pandiri
Antimony trioxide (AT) is used as a flame retardant in fabrics and plastics. Occupational exposure in miners and smelters is mainly through inhalation and dermal contact. Chronic inhalation exposure to AT particulates in B6C3F1/N mice and Wistar Han rats resulted in increased incidences and tumor multiplicities of alveolar/bronchiolar carcinomas (ABCs). In this study, we demonstrated Kras (43%) and Egfr (46%) hotspot mutations in mouse lung tumors (n = 80) and only Egfr (50%) mutations in rat lung tumors (n = 26). Interestingly, there were no differences in the incidences of these mutations in ABCs from rats and mice at exposure concentrations that did and did not exceed the pulmonary overload threshold. There was increased expression of p44/42 mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK) (Erk1/2) protein in ABCs harboring mutations in Kras and/or Egfr, confirming the activation of MAPK signaling. Transcriptomic analysis indicated significant alterations in MAPK signaling such as ephrin receptor signaling and signaling by Rho-family GTPases in AT-exposed ABCs. In addition, there was significant overlap between transcriptomic data from mouse ABCs due to AT exposure and human pulmonary adenocarcinoma data. Collectively, these data suggest chronic AT exposure exacerbates MAPK signaling in ABCs and, thus, may be translationally relevant to human lung cancers.
{"title":"Chronic Inhalation Exposure to Antimony Trioxide Exacerbates the MAPK Signaling in Alveolar Bronchiolar Carcinomas in B6C3F1/N Mice.","authors":"Thai-Vu T Ton, Hue-Hua L Hong, Ramesh C Kovi, Keith R Shockley, Shyamal D Peddada, Kevin E Gerrish, Kyathanahalli S Janardhan, Gordon Flake, Mathew D Stout, Robert C Sills, Arun R Pandiri","doi":"10.1177/01926233231157322","DOIUrl":"10.1177/01926233231157322","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Antimony trioxide (AT) is used as a flame retardant in fabrics and plastics. Occupational exposure in miners and smelters is mainly through inhalation and dermal contact. Chronic inhalation exposure to AT particulates in B6C3F1/N mice and Wistar Han rats resulted in increased incidences and tumor multiplicities of alveolar/bronchiolar carcinomas (ABCs). In this study, we demonstrated <i>Kras</i> (43%) and <i>Egfr</i> (46%) hotspot mutations in mouse lung tumors (n = 80) and only <i>Egfr</i> (50%) mutations in rat lung tumors (n = 26). Interestingly, there were no differences in the incidences of these mutations in ABCs from rats and mice at exposure concentrations that did and did not exceed the pulmonary overload threshold. There was increased expression of p44/42 mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK) (Erk1/2) protein in ABCs harboring mutations in <i>Kras</i> and/or <i>Egfr</i>, confirming the activation of MAPK signaling. Transcriptomic analysis indicated significant alterations in MAPK signaling such as ephrin receptor signaling and signaling by Rho-family GTPases in AT-exposed ABCs. In addition, there was significant overlap between transcriptomic data from mouse ABCs due to AT exposure and human pulmonary adenocarcinoma data. Collectively, these data suggest chronic AT exposure exacerbates MAPK signaling in ABCs and, thus, may be translationally relevant to human lung cancers.</p>","PeriodicalId":23113,"journal":{"name":"Toxicologic Pathology","volume":"51 1-2","pages":"39-55"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11368139/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"9640244","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}