Transfusion最新文献

Introduction: Data on the perioperative bleeding risk associated with elevated plasma levels of direct factor Xa inhibitors (FXa inhibitors) are limited. This study examines perioperative red blood cell (RBC) loss in patients undergoing urgent surgery with a residual FXa inhibitor level exceeding 100 mcg/L and without preoperative FXa inhibitor reversal.

Methods: This retrospective analysis includes data from 32 patients who underwent urgent noncardiac surgery between 2018 and 2022. This study aims to analyze perioperative RBC loss in patients undergoing urgent surgery with a residual FXa inhibitor level exceeding 100 mcg/L and without preoperative FXa inhibitor antidote-based reversal or unspecific treatment with 4-factor prothrombin complex concentrate (PCC). All patients were managed using a watch-and-wait strategy.

Results: The last determination of FXa inhibitor plasma concentration prior to surgery showed a median of 245 mcg/L (IQR 144-345), with a median time interval of 3.8 h (IQR 2.4-7.2) before incision. Median RBC loss during surgery was 49 mL (IQR 0-253), 189 mL (IQR 104-217) until POD1 and 254 mL (IQR 58-265) until POD3. Only one patient required intraoperative treatment with 4-factor-PCC and none required reversal with andexanet alfa. Linear regression models found no significant influence of FXa inhibitor plasma levels on intraoperative RBC loss. Rivaroxaban was associated with higher RBC loss until postoperative Day 1 compared with apixaban. No thromboembolic events were observed.

Conclusion: Despite markedly elevated plasma concentrations of residual direct FXa inhibitors, perioperative RBC loss was limited in patients undergoing urgent noncardiac surgery. The intraoperative watch-and-wait strategy with selective intraoperative FXa inhibitor reversal or treatment only when required appears to be an appropriate approach.

Background: Recent studies suggest Black patients are transfused less often and at lower hemoglobin levels than White patients. In elective surgery, Black and Non-White patients have greater estimated blood loss and transfusion frequency. We asked whether similar transfusion disparities are observable in acute trauma resuscitation.

Methods: In a single-center retrospective analysis of trauma registry/blood-bank-linked data from a large US trauma center, we identified all acute trauma patients 2011-2022. Our data sources permitted distinction of Race and Ethnicity and therefor binning as Non-White-race/not Hispanic plus any-race/Hispanic or White/not Hispanic. We tallied Injury Severity Scores mild through profound (ISS 1-9, 9-15, 16-25, >25), type (blunt vs. penetrating) and mechanism (firearms, etc.), and associated blood use overall and in the first, first four, and first 24 h, comparing results with chi square, p < .01.

Results: Overall, 50,394 (68.41%) acute trauma patients were classified as White and 23,251 (31.7%) as Other than White. White patients were more likely to receive any blood products (17.8% vs. 11.9%), but, for all measures of urgency/quantity, Non-White patients were transfused more often (respectively, first 4 h, 51.9% vs. 42.1%; ≥3u/first hour, 18.5% vs. 11.0%; ≥10u/24 h, 8.1% vs. 3.8%) (all p < .001). White patients were far more likely to have blunt injury than Non-White patients, (77.2% vs. 42.6%), less likely to have penetrating injury (10.1% vs. 14%) and far less likely to be injured by firearms (30.6% vs. 56.9%) (all p < .001).

Conclusions: At our center, blood use in acute trauma resuscitation was associated with injury severity and mechanism, not race/ethnicity.

Reversible cerebral vasoconstriction syndrome (RCVS) is a rare and understudied transfusion reaction most commonly seen in adult females after correction of chronic, severe anemia. Transfusion-associated RCVS (TA-RCVS) typically presents with thunderclap headaches and one or more systemic (hypertension, nausea/vomiting) or neurologic (seizure, stroke, visual changes) symptoms within a week after red blood cell transfusion. Treatment of RCVS is based on blood pressure control; a recent study suggested that early use of nimodipine could shorten the disease course.

Background: Blood services must consider innovative ways to encourage more Black people to donate to enhance the efficacy of treatments. We evaluate how two innovative arts-based approaches (co-designed and locally produced films and a large-scale Marvel Studios'/NHSBT collaboration) can achieve this by generalizing to a wider audience from their target audiences.

Study design and methods: Four co-designed short community films were produced in the United Kingdom: Comedy, Reciprocity, Donor-Recipient, and Sliding Doors. In Study 1 (N = 44: Black people), these films were evaluated in the target community in which they were produced. In Study 2 (N = 1237: Black = 638, White = 599), the community and Marvel Black Panther/NHSBT films were evaluated in a nontarget general population sample. Evaluations were in terms of campaign behavioral efficacy (e.g., willingness to donate, encourage others to donate) and affect. These analyses were segmented by donor status, age, and gender.

Results: Study 1 shows that the community groups rated the films very positively, with over 90% stating that they would be convinced to donate blood. Study 2 shows the results from the community films generalized to the general population, with the Black Panther film also rated positively in the general population. Three community films and the Black Panther film were rated equally positively. There were notable differences across generations and by donor status.

Discussion: The results highlight the power of arts-based approaches (both locally co-produced community films and franchise collaborations) in encouraging donors within their target audiences and, importantly, on the broader population.

Background: There is a paucity of high-quality data to guide appropriate fresh frozen plasma transfusion with current recommendations based on consensus opinion. The limitations of the product and testing modalities are poorly understood with the rare but potentially serious side effects underappreciated. Combined this has resulted in the widespread misuse of FFP.

Study design and methods: Retrospective data capturing FFP transfusion within the 12-month period of April 1, 2022 and March 31, 2023 was entered by Australian health care providers. Appropriate transfusion was assessed by the adjudicators and defined as one in keeping with current recommendations. Descriptive and comparative analyses were performed using SAS Studio version 9.4.

Results: During the study period, 935 FFP transfusion episodes were captured. The most frequent indications for FFP were massive hemorrhage 344 (37%), bleeding 141 (15%), and preoperative use 90 (10%). Males received 534 (60%) transfusions. Critical care specialists were the largest users of FFP, prescribing 568 (63%) of transfusions. FFP was used appropriately in 546 (61%) transfusions. However, when massive hemorrhage was excluded only 202 (37%) transfusions were appropriate. Patients with an INR <1.5 received 37% of transfusions. Transfusion associated adverse events were reported in 2% (15) of transfusions including two non-fatal anaphylactic reactions.

Discussion: This audit assesses the appropriate use of FFP across all major clinical indications and provides the largest body of evidence of Australian plasma transfusion practices. It highlights the widespread misuse of FFP, which is predominantly guided by consensus recommendations due to a lack of high-quality data.