Transplantation and Cellular Therapy最新文献

Haploidentical (Haplo) allogeneic HCTs (alloHCT) have been used more frequently over the last decade as survival is similar to HLA-matched related donor (MRD) alloHCTs. We aimed to identify donor and recipient immune signatures before alloHCT that are associated with clinically meaningful outcomes in MRD vs Haplo alloHCT recipients. This retrospective cohort study of 165 MRD (n = 132) and Haplo (n = 33) alloHCT recipients and their related donors between 2007-2019 with paired peripheral blood samples immunophenotyped for T-cell, B-cell, NK cell and dendritic cell (DC) subsets. Immune cells were quantified before alloHCT in donors and recipients; calculations of immune cell ratios were classified as high, intermediate, and low and analyzed with alloHCT outcomes. Haplo donors were younger than MRD donors (median: 35 vs 51 years), whereas Haplo recipients were older than MRD recipients (median: 68 vs 54 years), were more likely to have a Karnofsky Performance Score ≤ 70 (76% vs 57%), 3+ comorbidities (54% vs 47%), and were in complete remission prior to alloHCT (58% vs 42%).

In MRD alloHCT, a lower ratio of CD4+ to CD8+ effector memory cells in the donor was associated with lower 4-yr overall survival (OS; 25% vs 61%; P = .009), lower 4-yr progression free survival (PFS; 25% vs 58%; P = .014) and higher incidence of 1-yr transplant-related mortality (TRM; 39% vs 7%; P = .009) in recipients. A higher ratio of CD8+ effector memory to total NK cells measured in MRD recipients was associated with a higher incidence of grade II-IV aGvHD (63% vs 37%; P = .004) but was not statistically significant for III-IV aGvHD (23% vs 12%).

In Haplo alloHCT, a lower ratio of total T-regulatory to CD4+ central memory cells in the donor was associated with lower 4-yr PFS (22% vs 60%; P = .0091). A higher ratio of CD4+ effector memory to CD8+ effector memory cells measured in Haplo recipients pre-alloHCT was associated with lower 4-yr OS (25% vs 88%; P = .0039). In both MRD and Haplo recipients, a higher ratio of CD4+ naïve to CD4+ central memory cells was associated with a higher incidence of grade II-IV aGvHD (64% vs 38%; P = .04). Evaluation of pre-alloHCT immune signatures of the donor and recipient may influence clinically meaningful patient outcomes in both MRD and Haplo transplants.

Chimeric antigen receptor T cell therapy (CAR-T) has revolutionized the management of relapsed and/or refractory multiple myeloma (RRMM). However, CAR-T treatment failure is not uncommon and remains a major therapeutic challenge. There is substantial variability across transplantation and cellular therapy programs in assessing and managing post-CAR-T failures in patients with RRMM. The American Society for Transplantation and Cellular Therapy (ASTCT) Committee on Practice Guidelines conducted an online cross-sectional survey between September 2023 and December 2023 to determine myeloma, transplantation, and cellular therapy physicians’ practice patterns for the surveillance, diagnosis, and management of CAR-T failure. The intent of this survey was to understand clinical practice patterns and identify areas for further investigation. Email surveys were sent to 1311 ASTCT physician members, of whom 80 (6.1%) completed the survey. The respondents were 58% white and 66% male, and 51% had >10 years of clinical experience. Most (89%) respondents were affiliated with a university/teaching center, and 56% had a myeloma-focused transplantation and/or cellular therapy practice. Post-CAR-T surveillance laboratory studies were commonly done every 4 weeks, and surveillance bone marrow biopsies and/or imaging surveillance were most commonly done at 3 months. Sixty-four percent of the respondents would often or always consider biopsy or imaging to confirm relapse. The most popular post-CAR-T failure rescue regimen was GPRC5D-directed immunotherapy (30%) for relapses occurring ≤3 months and BCMA-directed bispecific therapies (32.5%) for relapse at >3 months. Forty-one percent of the respondents endorsed post-CAR-T prolonged cytopenia as being “often” or “always” a barrier to next-line therapy; 53% had offered stem cell boost as a mitigation approach. Substantial across-center variation in practice patterns raises the need for collaborative studies and expert clinical recommendations to describe best practices for post-CAR-T disease surveillance, optimal workup for treatment failure, and choice of rescue therapies.

Patients undergoing allogenic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) are at an increased risk of mortality due to transplantation-related complications in the first year post-transplantation, owing in part to the profound immune dysregulation with T cell and B cell lymphopenia and functional impairment. Although several large studies have reported higher mortality rates from Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) in HSCT recipients, to date no study has focused on the impact of early COVID-19 infection on immune reconstitution post-transplantation and the correlation with transplantation outcomes. We retrospectively analyzed 61 consecutive adult patients who underwent their first allogeneic HSCT at our institution. Thirteen patients (21.3%) experienced early COVID-19 infection, with a median time to diagnosis of 100 days post-transplantation. In multivariable analysis, patients with early COVID-19 infection had significantly worse overall survival (adjusted hazard ratio [aHR], 4.06; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.26 to 13.05; P = .019) and progression-free survival (aHR, 6.68; 95% CI, 2.11 to 21.11; P = .001). This was attributed mainly to higher nonrelapse mortality (NRM) among early COVID-19 patients (P = .042). Allogeneic HSCT recipients with early COVID-19 infection had significant delays in absolute lymphocyte count (95% CI, -703.69 to -56.79; P = .021), CD3⁺CD4⁺ cell (95% CI, -105.35 to -11.59; P = .042), CD3⁺CD8⁺ cell (95% CI, -324.55 to -57.13; P = .038), and CD3⁻CD56⁺ cell (95% CI, -193.51 to -47.31; P = .014) recovery compared to those without early COVID-19 infection. Our findings suggest that patients with early COVID-19 infection after allogeneic HSCT have higher NRM and worse survival, at least in part due to impaired immune reconstitution post-transplantation.

Allogeneic stem cell transplantation (alloSCT) offers curative potential for older patients with myeloid malignancies. We evaluated the efficacy and safety of alloSCT using post-transplantation cyclophosphamide (PTCy) in combination with a very short duration of immune suppression (IS) in this population. We retrospectively analyzed 92 consecutive patients aged 65 years and older who underwent an alloSCT for myeloid malignancies between February 2018 and December 2022 at our institution. Data on patient characteristics, treatment modalities, and outcomes were collected. Ninety-two patients received an alloSCT with PTCy-based graft versus host disease (GVHD) prophylaxis. The majority had minimal comorbidities and were diagnosed with acute myeloid leukemia. Patients mostly received conditioning regimens with low to intermediate transplant conditioning intensity scores. In 43% of patients, IS could be permanently stopped at day +90, resulting in a median time of IS of 2.93 months in high-risk patients. At a median follow-up of 21.3 months, the 1- and 2-year overall survival rates were 89% and 87%, respectively. Relapse-free survival rates were 88% and 84% at 1 and 2 years, respectively. The 1- and 2-year cumulative incidences of relapse were 8% and 13%, while treatment-related mortality (TRM) estimates were 9% at both time points. Acute GVHD grade 3 to 4 occurred in 7% within the first 180 days and severe chronic GVHD in 6% of patients. This all resulted in a 1- and 2-year graft versus host and relapse-free survival of 74% and 70%, respectively. AlloSCT using PTCy in combination with a short duration of IS in older patients with myeloid malignancies demonstrates favorable survival outcomes due to low relapse rates and a low TRM. The low incidence of relapse and acceptable rates of graft-versus-host disease suggest the efficacy and safety of this approach. Further studies are warranted to validate these findings and optimize transplant strategies for older patients with myeloid malignancies.

The use of immunotherapies for the treatment of cancer in children, adolescents, and young adults has become common. As the use of immunotherapy has expanded, including in earlier lines of therapy, it has become evident that several aspects of how these immunotherapies impact longer-term outcomes among survivors are understudied. Traditional cancer therapies like alkylating and platin agents carry the greatest risk of infertility, but little is known about the impact of novel immunotherapies on fertility. This topic is of great interest to patients, patient advocates, and clinicians. In this article, we review immunotherapeutic agents used to treat childhood and young adult cancers and discuss potential mechanisms by which they may impact fertility based on the known interplay between the immune system and reproductive organs. We highlight the relative paucity of high-quality literature examining these late effects. We discuss interventions to optimize fertility preservation (FP) for our patients. Conducting longitudinal, collaborative, and prospective research on the fertility outcomes of pediatric and young adult patients with cancer who receive immunotherapy is critical to learn how to effectively counsel our patients on long-term fertility outcomes and indications for FP procedures. Collection of patient-level data will be necessary to draft evidence-based guidelines on which providers can make therapy recommendations.

Preemptive therapy (PET) historically has been the primary strategy to reduce early-onset cytomegalovirus (CMV) reactivation after allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT) but is associated with antiviral-associated toxicities and increases in healthcare resource utilization and cost. Despite its high cost, letermovir (LTV) prophylaxis has largely supplanted PET due to its effectiveness and tolerability. Direct comparisons between LTV and PET approaches on economic and clinical outcomes after allogeneic HCT remain limited. Objective: To compare total cost of care (inpatient and outpatient) between LTV prophylaxis and PET through day+180 after allogeneic HCT. Adult allogeneic CMV seropositive (R+) HCT recipients who initiated LTV <30 days after HCT between 01/01/18 and 12/31/18 were matched 1:1 to allogeneic CMV R+ HCT recipients between 01/01/15 and 12/31/17 (PET cohort). Patients were grouped into high-risk (HR) or standard-risk (SR) for CMV to compare the LTV and PET cohorts. Direct costs for each patient's index HCT admission and all subsequent inpatient and outpatient care through day+180 after HCT were determined and converted into 2021 US dollars and then to Medicare proportional dollars (MPD). A secondary analysis using 2019 average wholesale price was conducted to specifically evaluate anti-CMV medication costs. There were a total of 176 patients with 54 HR CMV pairs and 34 SR CMV pairs. No differences in survival between LTV and PET for both HR and SR CMV groups were observed. The rate of clinically significant CMV infection decreased for both HR CMV (11/54, 20.4% versus 38/54, 70.4%, P < .001) and SR CMV (1/34, 2.9% versus 12/34, 35.3%, P < .001) patients who were given LTV prophylaxis with corresponding reductions in val(ganciclovir) and foscarnet (HR CMV only) use. Among HR CMV patients, LTV prophylaxis was associated with reductions in CMV-related readmissions (3/54, 5.6% versus 18/54, 33.3%, P < .001) and outpatient visits within the first 100 days after HCT (20 versus 25, P = .002), and a decreased median total cost of care ($36,018 versus $75,525, P < .001) in MPD was observed. For SR CMV patients on LTV, a significant reduction in the median inpatient cost ($15,668 versus $27,818, P < .001) was found, but this finding was offset by a higher median outpatient cost ($26,145 versus $20,307, P = .030) that was not CMV-driven. LTV prophylaxis is highly effective in reducing clinically significant CMV reactivations for both HR and SR HCT recipients. In this study, LTV prophylaxis was associated with a decreased total cost of care for HR CMV patients through day+180. Specifically, reductions in CMV-related readmissions, exposure to CMV-directed antiviral agents, and outpatient visits in the first 100 days after HCT were observed. SR CMV patients receiving LTV prophylaxis benefited by having a reduced inpatient cost of care du