首页 > 最新文献

Trauma Surgery & Acute Care Open最新文献

英文 中文
Safety or speed? Assessing alternative vascular access for angiography after resuscitative endovascular balloon occlusion of the aorta (REBOA) in severe pelvic trauma patients.
IF 2.1 Q3 CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE Pub Date : 2025-01-04 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI: 10.1136/tsaco-2024-001530
Yau-Ren Chang, Yu-Tung Wu, Szu An Chen, Chih-Yuan Fu, Chi-Tung Cheng, Ling-Wei Kuo, Jen Fu Huang, Chien-Hung Liao, Chi-Hsun Hsieh
<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Pelvic fractures often result in life-threatening bleeding and hemodynamic instability. Resuscitative endovascular balloon occlusion of the aorta (REBOA) has emerged as a promising strategy for patients with severe pelvic fractures, facilitating subsequent hemostatic interventions. Transcatheter arterial embolization (TAE) is a well-established procedure for managing pelvic fractures accompanied by hemorrhage.Ideally, an angiographic access point distinct from the initial REBOA placement is sought to maintain REBOA deflation without complete removal, thereby preventing hemodynamic instability during the procedure. However, in cases of extreme and severe pelvic trauma, gaining access for REBOA is already challenging, not to mention the additional difficulty posed by subsequent angiographic access.This study aims to assess the challenges associated with gaining access in cases where successful TAE was ultimately performed, particularly in the context of severe pelvic trauma. We investigate the complexities surrounding access management and its implications for patient outcomes.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a retrospective analysis of patients who presented with pelvic fractures and underwent sequential REBOA and TAE procedures at our institution between 2017 and 2023. We excluded patients with Abbreviated Injury Scores (AIS) ≥3 in systems other than the pelvis, those who underwent TAE prior to REBOA, and cases of suboptimal REBOA insertion.We collected demographic data, injury characteristics, details of the REBOA and TAE procedures, information on complications, and data on patient survival. The primary endpoints of our analysis included overall survival and the success of TAE (defined as post TAE mean arterial pressure (MAP) ≥65 mm Hg). Secondary endpoints encompassed the duration details of two interventions.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Between 2017 and 2023, a total of 17 patients were included in this study. Among this cohort, 12 (70.6%) were male, with a median age of 51 years. Overall survival was 23.5%. Patients were grouped into angiography after REBOA deflation (AAD) or angiography after REBOA removal (AAR). AAR group was younger (39.0 vs 63.0, p=0.030) and had higher Shock Index at triage (2.30 vs 1.10, p=0.015). More patient whose post TAE MAP >=65 mm Hg was found in the AAR group, although no significant difference on overall survival (25.0% vs 22.2%, p=1.000). Angiographic cannulation times, pre-angiographic MAP, and amount of pre-angiographic transfusion of packed red blood cell were similar across groups.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Our findings provide empirical insights into vascular access selection and suggest that AAR in the management of severe pelvic fractures can be beneficial, particularly when pre-angiographic resuscitation is sufficient. Larger studies are required to validate these observations and assess long-term outcomes.</p><p><strong>Level of evidence: </s
{"title":"Safety or speed? Assessing alternative vascular access for angiography after resuscitative endovascular balloon occlusion of the aorta (REBOA) in severe pelvic trauma patients.","authors":"Yau-Ren Chang, Yu-Tung Wu, Szu An Chen, Chih-Yuan Fu, Chi-Tung Cheng, Ling-Wei Kuo, Jen Fu Huang, Chien-Hung Liao, Chi-Hsun Hsieh","doi":"10.1136/tsaco-2024-001530","DOIUrl":"10.1136/tsaco-2024-001530","url":null,"abstract":"&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Introduction: &lt;/strong&gt;Pelvic fractures often result in life-threatening bleeding and hemodynamic instability. Resuscitative endovascular balloon occlusion of the aorta (REBOA) has emerged as a promising strategy for patients with severe pelvic fractures, facilitating subsequent hemostatic interventions. Transcatheter arterial embolization (TAE) is a well-established procedure for managing pelvic fractures accompanied by hemorrhage.Ideally, an angiographic access point distinct from the initial REBOA placement is sought to maintain REBOA deflation without complete removal, thereby preventing hemodynamic instability during the procedure. However, in cases of extreme and severe pelvic trauma, gaining access for REBOA is already challenging, not to mention the additional difficulty posed by subsequent angiographic access.This study aims to assess the challenges associated with gaining access in cases where successful TAE was ultimately performed, particularly in the context of severe pelvic trauma. We investigate the complexities surrounding access management and its implications for patient outcomes.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Methods: &lt;/strong&gt;We conducted a retrospective analysis of patients who presented with pelvic fractures and underwent sequential REBOA and TAE procedures at our institution between 2017 and 2023. We excluded patients with Abbreviated Injury Scores (AIS) ≥3 in systems other than the pelvis, those who underwent TAE prior to REBOA, and cases of suboptimal REBOA insertion.We collected demographic data, injury characteristics, details of the REBOA and TAE procedures, information on complications, and data on patient survival. The primary endpoints of our analysis included overall survival and the success of TAE (defined as post TAE mean arterial pressure (MAP) ≥65 mm Hg). Secondary endpoints encompassed the duration details of two interventions.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Results: &lt;/strong&gt;Between 2017 and 2023, a total of 17 patients were included in this study. Among this cohort, 12 (70.6%) were male, with a median age of 51 years. Overall survival was 23.5%. Patients were grouped into angiography after REBOA deflation (AAD) or angiography after REBOA removal (AAR). AAR group was younger (39.0 vs 63.0, p=0.030) and had higher Shock Index at triage (2.30 vs 1.10, p=0.015). More patient whose post TAE MAP &gt;=65 mm Hg was found in the AAR group, although no significant difference on overall survival (25.0% vs 22.2%, p=1.000). Angiographic cannulation times, pre-angiographic MAP, and amount of pre-angiographic transfusion of packed red blood cell were similar across groups.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Conclusion: &lt;/strong&gt;Our findings provide empirical insights into vascular access selection and suggest that AAR in the management of severe pelvic fractures can be beneficial, particularly when pre-angiographic resuscitation is sufficient. Larger studies are required to validate these observations and assess long-term outcomes.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Level of evidence: &lt;/s","PeriodicalId":23307,"journal":{"name":"Trauma Surgery & Acute Care Open","volume":"10 1","pages":"e001530"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1,"publicationDate":"2025-01-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11749535/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143024791","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Feasibility of ultraportable US in detecting clinically concerning recurrent pneumothorax in patients with chest trauma. 超便携超声检测胸外伤患者复发性气胸的临床可行性。
IF 2.1 Q3 CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE Pub Date : 2024-12-31 eCollection Date: 2024-01-01 DOI: 10.1136/tsaco-2024-001464
Abdul Hafiz Al Tannir, Courtney Pokrzywa, Patrick B Murphy, Elise A Biesboer, Juan Figueroa, Basil S Karam, Marc DeMoya, Thomas Carver

Background: Bedside thoracic ultrasound (US) offers numerous advantages over chest X-ray (CXR) for identification of recurrent pneumothoraces (PTX) after tube thoracostomy (TT) removal. Technologic advancements have led to the development of hand-held devices capable of producing high-quality images termed ultra-portable US (UPUS). We hypothesized that UPUS would be as successful as CXR in detecting post-TT removal PTX and would be preferred by patients.

Methods: We conducted a single-center prospective, feasibility, study at a level I trauma center investigating the use of UPUS in patients with trauma with TT placement. UPUS images were obtained daily while the TT was in place and post-TT removal (ranging from 1 through 6 hours). A clinically concerning PTX on UPUS was defined as the absence of lung sliding on two or more intercostal spaces. Poststudy Likert surveys were administered to assess patient preferences.

Results: Ninety-two patients were included in the analysis. The majority were men (87%), and the median age was 47 years. Thirty-five patients (36%) had discordant imaging findings. There were 11 clinically concerning PTX, of which 10 (91%) were detected on UPUS and 8 (73%) on CXR. Three patients required an intervention for post-pull PTX, all of whom were identified on UPUS. Eighty-four percent (N=70) of surveyed patients preferred UPUS over CXR with 92% reporting no discomfort with UPUS compared with 49% with CXR.

Conclusion: Bedside UPUS is preferred by patients and can successfully identify clinically concerning post-TT removal PTX. Implementation of UPUS as a post-TT removal diagnostic tool is a safe and effective alternative to CXR.

Level of evidence: Level II, diagnostic tests or criteria.

背景:胸旁超声(US)在诊断胸腔插管(TT)术后复发性气胸(PTX)方面比x线胸片(CXR)有许多优势。技术的进步导致了能够产生高质量图像的手持设备的发展,称为超便携式美国(UPUS)。我们假设UPUS在检测tt术后PTX方面与CXR一样成功,并且会受到患者的青睐。方法:我们在一家一级创伤中心进行了一项单中心前瞻性、可行性研究,调查UPUS在创伤放置TT患者中的应用。在TT放置期间和TT移除后(1至6小时)每天获取UPUS图像。临床上关注UPUS的PTX被定义为肺在两个或多个肋间隙上没有滑动。研究后进行李克特调查以评估患者的偏好。结果:92例患者纳入分析。大多数为男性(87%),中位年龄为47岁。35例(36%)患者影像学表现不一致。临床有PTX 11例,其中UPUS检出10例(91%),CXR检出8例(73%)。3例患者需要对牵拉后PTX进行干预,所有患者均在UPUS上被识别。84% (N=70)的受访患者更喜欢UPUS而不是CXR, 92%的患者报告UPUS没有不适,而CXR则为49%。结论:床边UPUS是患者的首选,可以成功识别临床tt术后PTX。UPUS作为tt后切除诊断工具的实施是CXR安全有效的替代方案。证据级别:II级,诊断测试或标准。
{"title":"Feasibility of ultraportable US in detecting clinically concerning recurrent pneumothorax in patients with chest trauma.","authors":"Abdul Hafiz Al Tannir, Courtney Pokrzywa, Patrick B Murphy, Elise A Biesboer, Juan Figueroa, Basil S Karam, Marc DeMoya, Thomas Carver","doi":"10.1136/tsaco-2024-001464","DOIUrl":"10.1136/tsaco-2024-001464","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Bedside thoracic ultrasound (US) offers numerous advantages over chest X-ray (CXR) for identification of recurrent pneumothoraces (PTX) after tube thoracostomy (TT) removal. Technologic advancements have led to the development of hand-held devices capable of producing high-quality images termed ultra-portable US (UPUS). We hypothesized that UPUS would be as successful as CXR in detecting post-TT removal PTX and would be preferred by patients.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a single-center prospective, feasibility, study at a level I trauma center investigating the use of UPUS in patients with trauma with TT placement. UPUS images were obtained daily while the TT was in place and post-TT removal (ranging from 1 through 6 hours). A clinically concerning PTX on UPUS was defined as the absence of lung sliding on two or more intercostal spaces. Poststudy Likert surveys were administered to assess patient preferences.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Ninety-two patients were included in the analysis. The majority were men (87%), and the median age was 47 years. Thirty-five patients (36%) had discordant imaging findings. There were 11 clinically concerning PTX, of which 10 (91%) were detected on UPUS and 8 (73%) on CXR. Three patients required an intervention for post-pull PTX, all of whom were identified on UPUS. Eighty-four percent (N=70) of surveyed patients preferred UPUS over CXR with 92% reporting no discomfort with UPUS compared with 49% with CXR.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Bedside UPUS is preferred by patients and can successfully identify clinically concerning post-TT removal PTX. Implementation of UPUS as a post-TT removal diagnostic tool is a safe and effective alternative to CXR.</p><p><strong>Level of evidence: </strong>Level II, diagnostic tests or criteria.</p>","PeriodicalId":23307,"journal":{"name":"Trauma Surgery & Acute Care Open","volume":"9 1","pages":"e001464"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1,"publicationDate":"2024-12-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11749396/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143012455","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Clinical utility of routine postoperative labs in emergency general surgery patients. 普通外科急诊病人术后常规化验室的临床应用。
IF 2.1 Q3 CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE Pub Date : 2024-12-31 eCollection Date: 2024-01-01 DOI: 10.1136/tsaco-2024-001568
Rebecca Empey, Hyunkyu Ko, Ram Nirula

Background: Morning postoperative labs are often obtained for emergency general surgery (EGS) patients. Studies in other surgical fields indicate that routine postoperative day 1 (POD1) labs are sometimes being performed excessively and do not require intervention. The purpose of this study is to identify predictors indicating the need for POD1 labs in EGS patients based on likelihood of intervention.

Methods: This is a retrospective review of non-critically ill EGS patients from 2022 to 2023 who received POD1 morning labs. The odds of having an abnormal result and likelihood of intervention were measured through multivariate logistic regression accounting for patient characteristics and procedure. Least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO) regression analysis was performed to determine significant predictors of an abnormal result and intervention.

Results: 502 EGS patients were included. LASSO revealed that procedure duration, fever, lysis of adhesions, preoperative systolic blood pressure <90 mm Hg, older age, heart failure, operative blood loss, chronic kidney disease, and anticoagulation use were independent predictors for any abnormal result (area under the receiver operation curve (AUC)=0.785). Independent predictors of intervention were procedure duration, older age, higher estimated blood loss (EBL), anticoagulant use, and lysis of adhesions (AUC=0.704). Procedures >400 min carried an 84.3% chance of an abnormal lab requiring intervention. EBL >200 mL carried a 75.5% chance of an abnormal lab requiring intervention.

Conclusion: POD1 labs for non-critically ill EGS patient rarely require intervention and can be safely omitted. Labs should be considered for longer procedures, higher EBLs, older patients, those on anticoagulation, or after lysis of adhesions.

背景:急诊普外科(EGS)患者经常需要早晨的术后化验室。其他外科领域的研究表明,常规术后第1天(POD1)实验室有时被过度进行,不需要干预。本研究的目的是根据干预的可能性确定EGS患者需要POD1实验室的预测因素。方法:回顾性分析2022 - 2023年接受POD1晨检的非危重EGS患者。出现异常结果的几率和干预的可能性通过考虑患者特征和程序的多变量逻辑回归来测量。进行最小绝对收缩和选择算子(LASSO)回归分析,以确定异常结果和干预的显著预测因子。结果:纳入EGS患者502例。LASSO显示,手术时间、发热、粘连溶解、术前收缩压400 min有84.3%的机会出现异常,需要干预。EBL >200 mL有75.5%的可能性出现异常,需要干预。结论:非危重期EGS患者的POD1实验室无需干预,可安全省略。实验室应考虑手术时间较长、EBLs较高、年龄较大、抗凝治疗或粘连溶解后的患者。
{"title":"Clinical utility of routine postoperative labs in emergency general surgery patients.","authors":"Rebecca Empey, Hyunkyu Ko, Ram Nirula","doi":"10.1136/tsaco-2024-001568","DOIUrl":"10.1136/tsaco-2024-001568","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Morning postoperative labs are often obtained for emergency general surgery (EGS) patients. Studies in other surgical fields indicate that routine postoperative day 1 (POD1) labs are sometimes being performed excessively and do not require intervention. The purpose of this study is to identify predictors indicating the need for POD1 labs in EGS patients based on likelihood of intervention.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This is a retrospective review of non-critically ill EGS patients from 2022 to 2023 who received POD1 morning labs. The odds of having an abnormal result and likelihood of intervention were measured through multivariate logistic regression accounting for patient characteristics and procedure. Least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO) regression analysis was performed to determine significant predictors of an abnormal result and intervention.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>502 EGS patients were included. LASSO revealed that procedure duration, fever, lysis of adhesions, preoperative systolic blood pressure <90 mm Hg, older age, heart failure, operative blood loss, chronic kidney disease, and anticoagulation use were independent predictors for any abnormal result (area under the receiver operation curve (AUC)=0.785). Independent predictors of intervention were procedure duration, older age, higher estimated blood loss (EBL), anticoagulant use, and lysis of adhesions (AUC=0.704). Procedures >400 min carried an 84.3% chance of an abnormal lab requiring intervention. EBL >200 mL carried a 75.5% chance of an abnormal lab requiring intervention.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>POD1 labs for non-critically ill EGS patient rarely require intervention and can be safely omitted. Labs should be considered for longer procedures, higher EBLs, older patients, those on anticoagulation, or after lysis of adhesions.</p>","PeriodicalId":23307,"journal":{"name":"Trauma Surgery & Acute Care Open","volume":"9 1","pages":"e001568"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1,"publicationDate":"2024-12-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11749762/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143012454","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Patient education series: exploratory laparotomy. 患者教育系列:剖腹探查术。
IF 2.1 Q3 CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE Pub Date : 2024-12-31 eCollection Date: 2024-01-01 DOI: 10.1136/tsaco-2024-001685
Aimee LaRiccia, Caitlin Anne Fitzgerald
{"title":"Patient education series: exploratory laparotomy.","authors":"Aimee LaRiccia, Caitlin Anne Fitzgerald","doi":"10.1136/tsaco-2024-001685","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1136/tsaco-2024-001685","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":23307,"journal":{"name":"Trauma Surgery & Acute Care Open","volume":"9 1","pages":"e001685"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1,"publicationDate":"2024-12-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11749491/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143012456","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Delayed fascial closure for prolonged open abdomen. 延长开腹期延迟筋膜闭合。
IF 2.1 Q3 CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE Pub Date : 2024-12-27 eCollection Date: 2024-01-01 DOI: 10.1136/tsaco-2024-001524
Taiki Yamataka, Shokei Matsumoto, Masayuki Shimizu
{"title":"Delayed fascial closure for prolonged open abdomen.","authors":"Taiki Yamataka, Shokei Matsumoto, Masayuki Shimizu","doi":"10.1136/tsaco-2024-001524","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1136/tsaco-2024-001524","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":23307,"journal":{"name":"Trauma Surgery & Acute Care Open","volume":"9 1","pages":"e001524"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1,"publicationDate":"2024-12-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11683964/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142906940","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Robotic versus Laparoscopic Emergency and Acute Care Surgery: Redefining Novelty (RLEARN): feasibility and benefit of robotic cholecystectomy for acute cholecystitis at a level 1 trauma center. 机器人与腹腔镜急诊和急性护理手术:重新定义新颖性(RLEARN):在一级创伤中心,机器人胆囊切除术治疗急性胆囊炎的可行性和益处。
IF 2.1 Q3 CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE Pub Date : 2024-12-27 eCollection Date: 2024-01-01 DOI: 10.1136/tsaco-2024-001522
Joshua Klein, Mekedes Lemma, Kartik Prabhakaran, Aryan Rafieezadeh, Jordan Michael Kirsch, Gabriel Rodriguez, Ilyse Blazar, Anna Jose, Bardiya Zangbar

Background: This study aims to compare outcomes of robotic cholecystectomy (RC) versus laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC) in the setting of a level 1 trauma center.

Methods: We performed a retrospective study of our hospital data (2021-2024) on patients who underwent LC or RC. Using a previously validated intraoperative grading system, four grades of cholecystitis were defined as mild (A), moderate (B), severe (C), and extreme (D). Outcomes were operative times and rates of conversion to open surgery.

Results: In total, 260 patients (n=130 RC and n=130 LC) were included. Patients were primarily female (69.2%), with mean age of 47±18.3 years. The majority of cases had grade B cholecystitis (41.2%). Patients undergoing RC had lower operative times compared with LC in grade B (101.87±17.54 vs 114.96±29.44 min, p=0.003) and grade C (134.68±26.97 vs 152.06±31.3 min, p=0.038). Conversion rate to open cholecystectomy were similar in both groups (p=0.19).

Conclusion: RC had similar results as LC in terms of operative time and in fact has significantly lower operative time in patients with grade B and grade C cholecystitis.

Level of evidence: Level III-retrospective study.

背景:本研究旨在比较机器人胆囊切除术(RC)与腹腔镜胆囊切除术(LC)在一级创伤中心的效果。方法:我们对我院(2021-2024)接受LC或RC的患者进行了回顾性研究。使用先前验证的术中分级系统,将胆囊炎分为轻度(a)、中度(B)、重度(C)和重度(D)四个级别。结果是手术时间和转向开放手术的比率。结果:共纳入260例(n=130例RC和n=130例LC)。患者以女性为主(69.2%),平均年龄47±18.3岁。多数病例为B级胆囊炎(41.2%)。与LC相比,RC患者在B级(101.87±17.54 vs 114.96±29.44 min, p=0.003)和C级(134.68±26.97 vs 152.06±31.3 min, p=0.038)的手术时间更短。两组转开腹胆囊切除术的发生率相似(p=0.19)。结论:RC与LC在手术时间上有相似的结果,事实上,在B级和C级胆囊炎患者中,RC的手术时间明显更短。证据等级:iii级-回顾性研究。
{"title":"Robotic versus Laparoscopic Emergency and Acute Care Surgery: Redefining Novelty (RLEARN): feasibility and benefit of robotic cholecystectomy for acute cholecystitis at a level 1 trauma center.","authors":"Joshua Klein, Mekedes Lemma, Kartik Prabhakaran, Aryan Rafieezadeh, Jordan Michael Kirsch, Gabriel Rodriguez, Ilyse Blazar, Anna Jose, Bardiya Zangbar","doi":"10.1136/tsaco-2024-001522","DOIUrl":"10.1136/tsaco-2024-001522","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>This study aims to compare outcomes of robotic cholecystectomy (RC) versus laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC) in the setting of a level 1 trauma center.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We performed a retrospective study of our hospital data (2021-2024) on patients who underwent LC or RC. Using a previously validated intraoperative grading system, four grades of cholecystitis were defined as mild (A), moderate (B), severe (C), and extreme (D). Outcomes were operative times and rates of conversion to open surgery.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In total, 260 patients (n=130 RC and n=130 LC) were included. Patients were primarily female (69.2%), with mean age of 47±18.3 years. The majority of cases had grade B cholecystitis (41.2%). Patients undergoing RC had lower operative times compared with LC in grade B (101.87±17.54 vs 114.96±29.44 min, p=0.003) and grade C (134.68±26.97 vs 152.06±31.3 min, p=0.038). Conversion rate to open cholecystectomy were similar in both groups (p=0.19).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>RC had similar results as LC in terms of operative time and in fact has significantly lower operative time in patients with grade B and grade C cholecystitis.</p><p><strong>Level of evidence: </strong>Level III-retrospective study.</p>","PeriodicalId":23307,"journal":{"name":"Trauma Surgery & Acute Care Open","volume":"9 1","pages":"e001522"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1,"publicationDate":"2024-12-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11683923/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142906944","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Trauma-informed language as a tool for health equity. 创伤知情语言作为卫生公平的工具。
IF 2.1 Q3 CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE Pub Date : 2024-12-24 eCollection Date: 2024-01-01 DOI: 10.1136/tsaco-2024-001558
Lucy Hart, John N Bliton, Christine Castater, Jessica H Beard, Randi N Smith
{"title":"Trauma-informed language as a tool for health equity.","authors":"Lucy Hart, John N Bliton, Christine Castater, Jessica H Beard, Randi N Smith","doi":"10.1136/tsaco-2024-001558","DOIUrl":"10.1136/tsaco-2024-001558","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":23307,"journal":{"name":"Trauma Surgery & Acute Care Open","volume":"9 1","pages":"e001558"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1,"publicationDate":"2024-12-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11683881/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142906945","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Pancreaticoduodenectomy in trauma patients with grade IV-V duodenal or pancreatic injuries: a post hoc analysis of an EAST multicenter trial. IV-V级十二指肠或胰腺损伤的创伤患者行胰十二指肠切除术:一项EAST多中心试验的事后分析
IF 2.1 Q3 CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE Pub Date : 2024-12-20 eCollection Date: 2024-01-01 DOI: 10.1136/tsaco-2024-001438
Rachel Leah Choron, Charoo Piplani, Julia Kuzinar, Amanda L Teichman, Christopher Bargoud, Jason D Sciarretta, Randi N Smith, Dustin Hanos, Iman N Afif, Jessica H Beard, Navpreet Kaur Dhillon, Ashling Zhang, Mira Ghneim, Rebekah Devasahayam, Oliver Gunter, Alison A Smith, Brandi Sun, Chloe S Cao, Jessica K Reynolds, Lauren A Hilt, Daniel N Holena, Grace Chang, Meghan Jonikas, Karla Echeverria-Rosario, Nathaniel S Fung, Aaron Anderson, Caitlin A Fitzgerald, Ryan Peter Dumas, Jeremy H Levin, Christine T Trankiem, JaeHee Yoon, Jacqueline Blank, Joshua P Hazelton, Christopher J McLaughlin, Rami Al-Aref, Jordan Michael Kirsch, Daniel S Howard, Dane R Scantling, Kate Dellonte, Michael A Vella, Brent Hopkins, Chloe Shell, Pascal Udekwu, Evan G Wong, Bellal Joseph, Howard Lieberman, Walter A Ramsey, Collin H Stewart, Claudia Alvarez, John D Berne, Jeffry Nahmias, Ivan Puente, Joe Patton, Ilya Rakitin, Lindsey Perea, Odessa Pulido, Hashim Ahmed, Jane Keating, Lisa M Kodadek, Jason Wade, Henry Reynold, Martin Schreiber, Andrew Benjamin, Abid Khan, Laura K Mann, Caleb Mentzer, Vasileios Mousafeiris, Francesk Mulita, Shari Reid-Gruner, Erica Sais, Christopher W Foote, Carlos H Palacio, Dias Argandykov, Haytham Kaafarani, Michelle T Bover Manderski, Lilamarie Moko, Mayur Narayan, Mark Seamon

Introduction: The utility of pancreaticoduodenectomy (PD) for high-grade traumatic injuries remains unclear and data surrounding its use are limited. We hypothesized that PD does not result in improved outcomes when compared with non-PD surgical management of grade IV-V pancreaticoduodenal injuries.

Methods: This is a retrospective, multicenter analysis from 35 level 1 trauma centers from January 2010 to December 2020. Included patients were ≥15 years of age with the American Association for the Surgery of Trauma grade IV-V duodenal and/or pancreatic injuries. The study compared operative repair strategy: PD versus non-PD.

Results: The sample (n=95) was young (26 years), male (82%), with predominantly penetrating injuries (76%). There was no difference in demographics, hemodynamics, or blood product requirement on presentation between PD (n=32) vs non-PD (n=63). Anatomically, PD patients had more grade V duodenal, grade V pancreatic, ampullary, and pancreatic ductal injuries compared with non-PD patients (all p<0.05). 43% of all grade V duodenal injuries and 40% of all grade V pancreatic injuries were still managed with non-PD. One-third of non-PD duodenal injuries were managed with primary repair alone. PD patients had more gastrointestinal (GI)-related complications, longer intensive care unit length of stay (LOS), and longer hospital LOS compared with non-PD (all p<0.05). There was no difference in mortality or readmission. Multivariable logistic regression analysis determined PD to be associated with a 3.8-fold greater odds of GI complication (p=0.010) compared with non-PD. In a subanalysis of patients without ampullary injuries (n=60), PD patients had more anastomotic leaks compared with the non-PD group (3 (30%) vs 2 (4%), p=0.028).

Conclusion: While PD patients did not have worse hemodynamics or blood product requirements on admission, they sustained more complex anatomic injuries and had more GI complications and longer LOS than non-PD patients. We suggest that the role of PD should be limited to cases of massive destruction of the pancreatic head and ampullary complex, given the likely procedure-related morbidity and adverse outcomes when compared with non-PD management.

Level of evidence: IV, Multicenter retrospective comparative study.

胰十二指肠切除术(PD)在高级别外伤性损伤中的应用尚不清楚,有关其应用的数据有限。我们假设,与非PD手术治疗IV-V级胰十二指肠损伤相比,PD并没有改善预后。方法:对2010年1月至2020年12月35家一级创伤中心进行回顾性、多中心分析。纳入的患者年龄≥15岁,美国创伤外科协会评定为IV-V级十二指肠和/或胰腺损伤。该研究比较了PD与非PD的手术修复策略。结果:样本(n=95)年轻(26岁),男性(82%),以穿透伤为主(76%)。PD (n=32)与非PD (n=63)在人口统计学、血流动力学或血液制品需求方面没有差异。解剖学上,与非PD患者相比,PD患者有更多的V级十二指肠、V级胰腺、壶腹和胰管损伤(均p=0.028)。结论:虽然PD患者入院时的血流动力学和血液制品要求并不差,但与非PD患者相比,PD患者存在更复杂的解剖损伤、更多的GI并发症和更长时间的LOS。我们建议,考虑到与非PD治疗相比可能的手术相关发病率和不良后果,PD的作用应限于胰头和壶腹复合体大面积破坏的病例。证据等级:IV,多中心回顾性比较研究。
{"title":"Pancreaticoduodenectomy in trauma patients with grade IV-V duodenal or pancreatic injuries: a post hoc analysis of an EAST multicenter trial.","authors":"Rachel Leah Choron, Charoo Piplani, Julia Kuzinar, Amanda L Teichman, Christopher Bargoud, Jason D Sciarretta, Randi N Smith, Dustin Hanos, Iman N Afif, Jessica H Beard, Navpreet Kaur Dhillon, Ashling Zhang, Mira Ghneim, Rebekah Devasahayam, Oliver Gunter, Alison A Smith, Brandi Sun, Chloe S Cao, Jessica K Reynolds, Lauren A Hilt, Daniel N Holena, Grace Chang, Meghan Jonikas, Karla Echeverria-Rosario, Nathaniel S Fung, Aaron Anderson, Caitlin A Fitzgerald, Ryan Peter Dumas, Jeremy H Levin, Christine T Trankiem, JaeHee Yoon, Jacqueline Blank, Joshua P Hazelton, Christopher J McLaughlin, Rami Al-Aref, Jordan Michael Kirsch, Daniel S Howard, Dane R Scantling, Kate Dellonte, Michael A Vella, Brent Hopkins, Chloe Shell, Pascal Udekwu, Evan G Wong, Bellal Joseph, Howard Lieberman, Walter A Ramsey, Collin H Stewart, Claudia Alvarez, John D Berne, Jeffry Nahmias, Ivan Puente, Joe Patton, Ilya Rakitin, Lindsey Perea, Odessa Pulido, Hashim Ahmed, Jane Keating, Lisa M Kodadek, Jason Wade, Henry Reynold, Martin Schreiber, Andrew Benjamin, Abid Khan, Laura K Mann, Caleb Mentzer, Vasileios Mousafeiris, Francesk Mulita, Shari Reid-Gruner, Erica Sais, Christopher W Foote, Carlos H Palacio, Dias Argandykov, Haytham Kaafarani, Michelle T Bover Manderski, Lilamarie Moko, Mayur Narayan, Mark Seamon","doi":"10.1136/tsaco-2024-001438","DOIUrl":"10.1136/tsaco-2024-001438","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>The utility of pancreaticoduodenectomy (PD) for high-grade traumatic injuries remains unclear and data surrounding its use are limited. We hypothesized that PD does not result in improved outcomes when compared with non-PD surgical management of grade IV-V pancreaticoduodenal injuries.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This is a retrospective, multicenter analysis from 35 level 1 trauma centers from January 2010 to December 2020. Included patients were ≥15 years of age with the American Association for the Surgery of Trauma grade IV-V duodenal and/or pancreatic injuries. The study compared operative repair strategy: PD versus non-PD.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The sample (n=95) was young (26 years), male (82%), with predominantly penetrating injuries (76%). There was no difference in demographics, hemodynamics, or blood product requirement on presentation between PD (n=32) vs non-PD (n=63). Anatomically, PD patients had more grade V duodenal, grade V pancreatic, ampullary, and pancreatic ductal injuries compared with non-PD patients (all p<0.05). 43% of all grade V duodenal injuries and 40% of all grade V pancreatic injuries were still managed with non-PD. One-third of non-PD duodenal injuries were managed with primary repair alone. PD patients had more gastrointestinal (GI)-related complications, longer intensive care unit length of stay (LOS), and longer hospital LOS compared with non-PD (all p<0.05). There was no difference in mortality or readmission. Multivariable logistic regression analysis determined PD to be associated with a 3.8-fold greater odds of GI complication (p=0.010) compared with non-PD. In a subanalysis of patients without ampullary injuries (n=60), PD patients had more anastomotic leaks compared with the non-PD group (3 (30%) vs 2 (4%), p<i>=</i>0.028).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>While PD patients did not have worse hemodynamics or blood product requirements on admission, they sustained more complex anatomic injuries and had more GI complications and longer LOS than non-PD patients. We suggest that the role of PD should be limited to cases of massive destruction of the pancreatic head and ampullary complex, given the likely procedure-related morbidity and adverse outcomes when compared with non-PD management.</p><p><strong>Level of evidence: </strong>IV, Multicenter retrospective comparative study.</p>","PeriodicalId":23307,"journal":{"name":"Trauma Surgery & Acute Care Open","volume":"9 1","pages":"e001438"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1,"publicationDate":"2024-12-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11664373/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142882975","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Equitable and effective clinical guidance development and dissemination: trauma aims to lead the way. 公平有效的临床指导制定和传播:创伤旨在引领道路。
IF 2.1 Q3 CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE Pub Date : 2024-12-20 eCollection Date: 2024-01-01 DOI: 10.1136/tsaco-2023-001338
Lacey N LaGrone, Deborah M Stein, Danielle J Wilson, Eileen M Bulger, Ashley Farley, Andrés M Rubiano, Maria Michaels, Meghan B Lane-Fall, Michael A Person, Vanessa P Ho, Linda Reinhart, Elliott R Haut

Thirty-four per cent of deaths among Americans aged 1-46 are due to injury, and many of these deaths could be prevented if all hospitals performed as well as the highest-performing hospitals. The Institute of Medicine and the National Academies of Science, Engineering and Medicine have called for learning health systems, with emphasis on clinical practice guidelines (CPGs) as a means of limiting preventable deaths. Reduction in mortality has been demonstrated when evidence-based trauma CPGs are adhered to; however, guidelines are variably updated, redundant, absent, inaccessible, or perceived as irrelevant. Ultimately, these barriers result in poor guideline implementation and preventable patient deaths. This multidisciplinary group of injury providers, clinical guidance developers and end users, public health and health policy experts and implementation scientists propose key areas for consideration in the definition of an ideal future state for clinical guidance development and dissemination. Suggestions include (1): professional societies collaborate rather than compete for guideline development.(2) Design primary clinical research for implementation, and where relevant, with guideline development in mind.(3) Select clinical topics for guideline development through systematic prioritization, with an emphasis on patient-centered outcomes.(4) Develop guideline authorship groups with a focus on transparency, equity of opportunity and diversity of representation.(5) Establish a plan for regular review and updating and provide the date the guideline was last updated for transparency.(6) Integrate options for adapting the guideline to local resources and needs at the time of development.(7) Make guidelines available on a platform that allows for open feedback and utilization tracking.(8) Improve discoverability of guidelines.(9) Optimize user-experience with a focus on inclusion of bedside-ready, mobile-friendly infographics, tables or algorithms when feasible.(10) Use open access and open licenses.(11) Disseminate clinical guidance via comprehensive and equitable communication channels. Guidelines are key to improve patient outcomes. The proposed focus to ensure trauma guidelines are equitably and effectively developed and disseminated globally.

在1至46岁的美国人中,有34%的死亡是由于受伤造成的,如果所有医院的表现都和表现最好的医院一样好,其中许多死亡是可以避免的。美国医学研究所和美国国家科学院、工程院和医学院呼吁建立学习型卫生系统,重点放在临床实践指南(CPGs)上,作为限制可预防死亡的一种手段。当遵循循证创伤CPGs时,已证明死亡率降低;然而,指导方针是不断更新的、冗余的、缺席的、不可访问的,或者被认为是不相关的。最终,这些障碍导致指南执行不力和可预防的患者死亡。这个由损伤提供者、临床指南开发者和最终用户、公共卫生和卫生政策专家以及实施科学家组成的多学科小组提出了在定义临床指南开发和传播的理想未来状态时需要考虑的关键领域。建议包括:(1):(3)通过系统的优先排序,重点关注以患者为中心的结果,选择指南制定的临床主题。(4)建立指南撰写小组,重点关注透明度。股票的机会和表现的多样性。(5)建立定期审查和更新计划,并提供透明度的方针是最后更新日期。(6)集成选择指导适应当地资源和需求的发展。(7)提供指导方针在一个平台上,允许打开跟踪反馈和利用。(8)改善的可发现性的指导方针。(9)与关注包含bedside-ready优化用户体验,(10)使用开放获取和开放许可。(11)通过全面、公平的沟通渠道传播临床指导。指导方针是改善患者预后的关键。建议的重点是确保在全球公平有效地制定和传播创伤指南。
{"title":"Equitable and effective clinical guidance development and dissemination: trauma aims to lead the way.","authors":"Lacey N LaGrone, Deborah M Stein, Danielle J Wilson, Eileen M Bulger, Ashley Farley, Andrés M Rubiano, Maria Michaels, Meghan B Lane-Fall, Michael A Person, Vanessa P Ho, Linda Reinhart, Elliott R Haut","doi":"10.1136/tsaco-2023-001338","DOIUrl":"10.1136/tsaco-2023-001338","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Thirty-four per cent of deaths among Americans aged 1-46 are due to injury, and many of these deaths could be prevented if all hospitals performed as well as the highest-performing hospitals. The Institute of Medicine and the National Academies of Science, Engineering and Medicine have called for learning health systems, with emphasis on clinical practice guidelines (CPGs) as a means of limiting preventable deaths. Reduction in mortality has been demonstrated when evidence-based trauma CPGs are adhered to; however, guidelines are variably updated, redundant, absent, inaccessible, or perceived as irrelevant. Ultimately, these barriers result in poor guideline implementation and preventable patient deaths. This multidisciplinary group of injury providers, clinical guidance developers and end users, public health and health policy experts and implementation scientists propose key areas for consideration in the definition of an ideal future state for clinical guidance development and dissemination. Suggestions include (1): professional societies collaborate rather than compete for guideline development.(2) Design primary clinical research for implementation, and where relevant, with guideline development in mind.(3) Select clinical topics for guideline development through systematic prioritization, with an emphasis on patient-centered outcomes.(4) Develop guideline authorship groups with a focus on transparency, equity of opportunity and diversity of representation.(5) Establish a plan for regular review and updating and provide the date the guideline was last updated for transparency.(6) Integrate options for adapting the guideline to local resources and needs at the time of development.(7) Make guidelines available on a platform that allows for open feedback and utilization tracking.(8) Improve discoverability of guidelines.(9) Optimize user-experience with a focus on inclusion of bedside-ready, mobile-friendly infographics, tables or algorithms when feasible.(10) Use open access and open licenses.(11) Disseminate clinical guidance via comprehensive and equitable communication channels. Guidelines are key to improve patient outcomes. The proposed focus to ensure trauma guidelines are equitably and effectively developed and disseminated globally.</p>","PeriodicalId":23307,"journal":{"name":"Trauma Surgery & Acute Care Open","volume":"9 1","pages":"e001338"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1,"publicationDate":"2024-12-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11667293/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142886050","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Mitigating the risk of low-titer group O-positive whole blood resuscitation in females of childbearing potential: toward a systems-based approach. 降低具有生育能力的女性低滴度o型阳性全血复苏的风险:朝着基于系统的方法发展。
IF 2.1 Q3 CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE Pub Date : 2024-12-15 eCollection Date: 2024-01-01 DOI: 10.1136/tsaco-2024-001687
Elizabeth P Crowe, Steven M Frank, Matthew J Levy
{"title":"Mitigating the risk of low-titer group O-positive whole blood resuscitation in females of childbearing potential: toward a systems-based approach.","authors":"Elizabeth P Crowe, Steven M Frank, Matthew J Levy","doi":"10.1136/tsaco-2024-001687","DOIUrl":"10.1136/tsaco-2024-001687","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":23307,"journal":{"name":"Trauma Surgery & Acute Care Open","volume":"9 1","pages":"e001687"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1,"publicationDate":"2024-12-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11647374/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142839586","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
期刊
Trauma Surgery & Acute Care Open
全部 Acc. Chem. Res. ACS Applied Bio Materials ACS Appl. Electron. Mater. ACS Appl. Energy Mater. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces ACS Appl. Nano Mater. ACS Appl. Polym. Mater. ACS BIOMATER-SCI ENG ACS Catal. ACS Cent. Sci. ACS Chem. Biol. ACS Chemical Health & Safety ACS Chem. Neurosci. ACS Comb. Sci. ACS Earth Space Chem. ACS Energy Lett. ACS Infect. Dis. ACS Macro Lett. ACS Mater. Lett. ACS Med. Chem. Lett. ACS Nano ACS Omega ACS Photonics ACS Sens. ACS Sustainable Chem. Eng. ACS Synth. Biol. Anal. Chem. BIOCHEMISTRY-US Bioconjugate Chem. BIOMACROMOLECULES Chem. Res. Toxicol. Chem. Rev. Chem. Mater. CRYST GROWTH DES ENERG FUEL Environ. Sci. Technol. Environ. Sci. Technol. Lett. Eur. J. Inorg. Chem. IND ENG CHEM RES Inorg. Chem. J. Agric. Food. Chem. J. Chem. Eng. Data J. Chem. Educ. J. Chem. Inf. Model. J. Chem. Theory Comput. J. Med. Chem. J. Nat. Prod. J PROTEOME RES J. Am. Chem. Soc. LANGMUIR MACROMOLECULES Mol. Pharmaceutics Nano Lett. Org. Lett. ORG PROCESS RES DEV ORGANOMETALLICS J. Org. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. A J. Phys. Chem. B J. Phys. Chem. C J. Phys. Chem. Lett. Analyst Anal. Methods Biomater. Sci. Catal. Sci. Technol. Chem. Commun. Chem. Soc. Rev. CHEM EDUC RES PRACT CRYSTENGCOMM Dalton Trans. Energy Environ. Sci. ENVIRON SCI-NANO ENVIRON SCI-PROC IMP ENVIRON SCI-WAT RES Faraday Discuss. Food Funct. Green Chem. Inorg. Chem. Front. Integr. Biol. J. Anal. At. Spectrom. J. Mater. Chem. A J. Mater. Chem. B J. Mater. Chem. C Lab Chip Mater. Chem. Front. Mater. Horiz. MEDCHEMCOMM Metallomics Mol. Biosyst. Mol. Syst. Des. Eng. Nanoscale Nanoscale Horiz. Nat. Prod. Rep. New J. Chem. Org. Biomol. Chem. Org. Chem. Front. PHOTOCH PHOTOBIO SCI PCCP Polym. Chem.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1