Pub Date : 2025-11-04eCollection Date: 2025-01-01DOI: 10.1136/tsaco-2024-001747
Caitlin J Cain-Trivette, Emily Manin, Anjile An, Yaffa M Vitberg, P Stephen Oh, Shaun Steigman
Background: Non-operative management (NOM) of blunt splenic injury (BSI) is the target for pediatric trauma care. Yet, the rates of splenectomy have historically been higher at non-pediatric trauma centers (PTCs). We sought to determine if this difference improved contemporaneously.
Methods: Using the National Trauma Data Bank, 26 707 pediatric patients (age ≤18 years, 2013 to 2021) with BSI were identified and analyzed based on care at adult trauma centers (ATCs), dual trauma centers (DTCs), or pediatric trauma centers (PTCs) using descriptive statistics and logistic regressions. The primary outcome was splenectomy rate.
Results: Of the 26 707 pediatric patients with BSI, 5569 (20.9%) were treated at PTCs, 11 904 (44.6%) at ATCs, and 9234 (34.6%) at DTCs. In a multivariable logistic regression model, pediatric patients had significantly higher odds of splenectomy at ATCs (OR 4.89; 95% CI 3.82 to 6.45) and DTCs (OR 3.31; 95% CI 2.57 to 4.31) versus PTCs. In a subanalysis, older patients (15 years to 18 years) also had a significantly higher odds of splenectomy at ATCs (OR 7.27; 95% CI 4.58 to 12.1) and DTCs (OR 5.10; 95% CI 3.18 to 8.57) versus PTCs. Of patients aged 15 years to 18 years the majority were treated at ATCs (58.6%) or DTCs (32.1%) compared with PTCs (9.3%), whereas 32.6% of patients aged <15 years were treated at PTCs. These differences persisted across the study period.
Conclusion: Pediatric patients with BSI continue to have higher splenectomy rates when they are treated at ATCs and DTCs compared with PTCs. To improve these rates, healthcare systems should expand access to PTCs and investigate causality to improve pediatric trauma care rendered at ATCs and DTCs.
Level of evidence: Level II.
背景:钝性脾损伤(BSI)的非手术治疗是儿科创伤护理的目标。然而,脾切除术率历来在非儿科创伤中心(ptc)较高。我们试图确定这种差异是否同时得到改善。方法:利用国家创伤数据库,对26 707例在成人创伤中心(ATCs)、双创伤中心(dtc)或儿童创伤中心(ptc)接受治疗的BSI患儿(年龄≤18岁,2013 - 2021)进行描述性统计和logistic回归分析。主要观察指标为脾切除术率。结果:在26 707例小儿BSI患者中,5569例(20.9%)在ptc治疗,11 904例(44.6%)在ATCs治疗,9234例(34.6%)在dtc治疗。在多变量logistic回归模型中,与PTCs相比,ATCs (OR 4.89; 95% CI 3.82至6.45)和dtc (OR 3.31; 95% CI 2.57至4.31)的儿科患者脾切除术的几率明显更高。在一项亚分析中,年龄较大的患者(15至18岁)在ATCs (OR 7.27; 95% CI 4.58至12.1)和dtc (OR 5.10; 95% CI 3.18至8.57)与ptc相比,脾切除术的几率也明显更高。在15岁至18岁的患者中,大多数患者在ATCs(58.6%)或dtc(32.1%)接受治疗,而在PTCs(9.3%)接受治疗,而年龄为32.6%的患者在ATCs和dtc接受治疗时,小儿BSI患者的脾切除术率继续高于PTCs。为了提高这些比率,医疗保健系统应该扩大PTCs的使用范围,并调查因果关系,以改善ATCs和dtc提供的儿科创伤护理。证据等级:二级。
{"title":"Age and trauma center-specific disparities in splenectomy rates for pediatric trauma patients.","authors":"Caitlin J Cain-Trivette, Emily Manin, Anjile An, Yaffa M Vitberg, P Stephen Oh, Shaun Steigman","doi":"10.1136/tsaco-2024-001747","DOIUrl":"10.1136/tsaco-2024-001747","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Non-operative management (NOM) of blunt splenic injury (BSI) is the target for pediatric trauma care. Yet, the rates of splenectomy have historically been higher at non-pediatric trauma centers (PTCs). We sought to determine if this difference improved contemporaneously.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Using the National Trauma Data Bank, 26 707 pediatric patients (age ≤18 years, 2013 to 2021) with BSI were identified and analyzed based on care at adult trauma centers (ATCs), dual trauma centers (DTCs), or pediatric trauma centers (PTCs) using descriptive statistics and logistic regressions. The primary outcome was splenectomy rate.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of the 26 707 pediatric patients with BSI, 5569 (20.9%) were treated at PTCs, 11 904 (44.6%) at ATCs, and 9234 (34.6%) at DTCs. In a multivariable logistic regression model, pediatric patients had significantly higher odds of splenectomy at ATCs (OR 4.89; 95% CI 3.82 to 6.45) and DTCs (OR 3.31; 95% CI 2.57 to 4.31) versus PTCs. In a subanalysis, older patients (15 years to 18 years) also had a significantly higher odds of splenectomy at ATCs (OR 7.27; 95% CI 4.58 to 12.1) and DTCs (OR 5.10; 95% CI 3.18 to 8.57) versus PTCs. Of patients aged 15 years to 18 years the majority were treated at ATCs (58.6%) or DTCs (32.1%) compared with PTCs (9.3%), whereas 32.6% of patients aged <15 years were treated at PTCs. These differences persisted across the study period.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Pediatric patients with BSI continue to have higher splenectomy rates when they are treated at ATCs and DTCs compared with PTCs. To improve these rates, healthcare systems should expand access to PTCs and investigate causality to improve pediatric trauma care rendered at ATCs and DTCs.</p><p><strong>Level of evidence: </strong>Level II.</p>","PeriodicalId":23307,"journal":{"name":"Trauma Surgery & Acute Care Open","volume":"10 4","pages":"e001747"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2,"publicationDate":"2025-11-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12587981/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145459989","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-11-04eCollection Date: 2025-01-01DOI: 10.1136/tsaco-2025-001975
Gary Alan Bass, Caoimhe C Duffy, Jeremy W Cannon, Jay A Yelon, Paula Ferrada, Susan Evans, Jennifer M Leonard, Lewis J Kaplan
Effective leadership during trauma resuscitation is a determinant of team performance and patient outcomes, yet existing training curricula remain procedure-centric and do not explicitly address the leadership domain. A structured, competency-based framework tailored to the resuscitation context may support more consistent training, evaluation, and entrustment of emerging trauma leaders. A narrative review of the literature was conducted across MEDLINE, Embase and Scopus using terms related to trauma, leadership, non-technical skills and competency frameworks. Relevant publications were categorized into: (1) leadership theory and styles; (2) non-technical skills frameworks; (3) trauma resuscitation education and assessment and (4) high-reliability team training from allied domains. Concepts were synthesized to derive a set of core competencies for trauma resuscitation leadership. Five interdependent competencies were identified: (1) adaptive leadership style matched to clinical context; (2) time-bound decision-making under uncertainty; (3) communication strategies that balance clarity with brevity; (4) fostering psychological safety and team coordination and (5) ongoing self-reflection with coached feedback. A continuum of leadership styles, spanning directive to facilitative, was adapted to the acute resuscitation environment. Educational modalities proposed include high-fidelity simulation, structured video review, in-situ coaching and behavioral checklists linked to entrustable professional activities. The framework delineates leadership training as distinct from, but complementary to, established technical protocols such as Advanced Trauma Life Support. This competency-based framework provides a structured approach to developing trauma resuscitation leadership skills. By defining observable behaviors, mapping them to multimodal training methods and proposing evaluation strategies, it offers a basis for systematic integration into trauma education. The framework may enhance reproducibility of training, strengthen team performance and improve patient care in high-acuity environments. Level of evidence: Narrative review.
{"title":"Surgeon leadership in trauma resuscitation requires a competency-based multimodal training framework.","authors":"Gary Alan Bass, Caoimhe C Duffy, Jeremy W Cannon, Jay A Yelon, Paula Ferrada, Susan Evans, Jennifer M Leonard, Lewis J Kaplan","doi":"10.1136/tsaco-2025-001975","DOIUrl":"10.1136/tsaco-2025-001975","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Effective leadership during trauma resuscitation is a determinant of team performance and patient outcomes, yet existing training curricula remain procedure-centric and do not explicitly address the leadership domain. A structured, competency-based framework tailored to the resuscitation context may support more consistent training, evaluation, and entrustment of emerging trauma leaders. A narrative review of the literature was conducted across MEDLINE, Embase and Scopus using terms related to trauma, leadership, non-technical skills and competency frameworks. Relevant publications were categorized into: (1) leadership theory and styles; (2) non-technical skills frameworks; (3) trauma resuscitation education and assessment and (4) high-reliability team training from allied domains. Concepts were synthesized to derive a set of core competencies for trauma resuscitation leadership. Five interdependent competencies were identified: (1) adaptive leadership style matched to clinical context; (2) time-bound decision-making under uncertainty; (3) communication strategies that balance clarity with brevity; (4) fostering psychological safety and team coordination and (5) ongoing self-reflection with coached feedback. A continuum of leadership styles, spanning directive to facilitative, was adapted to the acute resuscitation environment. Educational modalities proposed include high-fidelity simulation, structured video review, in-situ coaching and behavioral checklists linked to entrustable professional activities. The framework delineates leadership training as distinct from, but complementary to, established technical protocols such as Advanced Trauma Life Support. This competency-based framework provides a structured approach to developing trauma resuscitation leadership skills. By defining observable behaviors, mapping them to multimodal training methods and proposing evaluation strategies, it offers a basis for systematic integration into trauma education. The framework may enhance reproducibility of training, strengthen team performance and improve patient care in high-acuity environments. Level of evidence: Narrative review.</p>","PeriodicalId":23307,"journal":{"name":"Trauma Surgery & Acute Care Open","volume":"10 4","pages":"e001975"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2,"publicationDate":"2025-11-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12588015/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145459974","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-10-31eCollection Date: 2025-01-01DOI: 10.1136/tsaco-2025-002115
Dries Helsloot
{"title":"Calcium in major trauma: in search of the Holy Grail?","authors":"Dries Helsloot","doi":"10.1136/tsaco-2025-002115","DOIUrl":"10.1136/tsaco-2025-002115","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":23307,"journal":{"name":"Trauma Surgery & Acute Care Open","volume":"10 4","pages":"e002115"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2,"publicationDate":"2025-10-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12581077/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145446043","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-10-31eCollection Date: 2025-01-01DOI: 10.1136/tsaco-2025-001759
Maria Kristina Vanguardia, Chen Lew, Matthew Lukies, Joseph Mathew, Mark Fitzgerald
Background: Traumatic abdominal wall hernias (TAWHs) are uncommon but serious injuries resulting from blunt abdominal trauma. Despite their low incidence, the associated morbidity and mortality rates necessitate effective management strategies. This study aims to assess the incidence, injury patterns, and optimal management strategies for TAWHs.
Method: This retrospective cohort study was conducted at a level-1 trauma center in Melbourne, Australia, spanning 20 years. Patients diagnosed with TAWHs between October 2002 and October 2023 were identified through trauma and radiological databases.
Results: Out of 220 patients identified, 71 were confirmed to have TAWHs. The mean age was 45.2 years. High-speed motor vehicle collisions were the most common injury mechanism. About 54% of patients required intensive care unit admission, and 53.5% underwent trauma laparoscopy/laparotomy. Key factors necessitating immediate operation included CT findings of free gas, perforation, degloving injury, hypoattenuation suggestive of bowel ischemia, and traumatic bowel injury. Additional CT findings significantly associated with intra-abdominal injury were free fluid, hematoma, contrast extravasation to suggest active hemorrhage, and bowel herniation through the hernia defect. The majority of patients without these CT findings were successfully managed conservatively, with the option of elective mesh repair.
Conclusion: Our study highlights the need for clinical vigilance in high-energy trauma cases and the use of CT in diagnosis. Although trauma laparotomy is essential for suspected intra-abdominal injury, select hemodynamically stable patients may be safely managed non-operatively.
{"title":"Traumatic abdominal wall hernias: a 20-year retrospective cohort study.","authors":"Maria Kristina Vanguardia, Chen Lew, Matthew Lukies, Joseph Mathew, Mark Fitzgerald","doi":"10.1136/tsaco-2025-001759","DOIUrl":"10.1136/tsaco-2025-001759","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Traumatic abdominal wall hernias (TAWHs) are uncommon but serious injuries resulting from blunt abdominal trauma. Despite their low incidence, the associated morbidity and mortality rates necessitate effective management strategies. This study aims to assess the incidence, injury patterns, and optimal management strategies for TAWHs.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>This retrospective cohort study was conducted at a level-1 trauma center in Melbourne, Australia, spanning 20 years. Patients diagnosed with TAWHs between October 2002 and October 2023 were identified through trauma and radiological databases.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Out of 220 patients identified, 71 were confirmed to have TAWHs. The mean age was 45.2 years. High-speed motor vehicle collisions were the most common injury mechanism. About 54% of patients required intensive care unit admission, and 53.5% underwent trauma laparoscopy/laparotomy. Key factors necessitating immediate operation included CT findings of free gas, perforation, degloving injury, hypoattenuation suggestive of bowel ischemia, and traumatic bowel injury. Additional CT findings significantly associated with intra-abdominal injury were free fluid, hematoma, contrast extravasation to suggest active hemorrhage, and bowel herniation through the hernia defect. The majority of patients without these CT findings were successfully managed conservatively, with the option of elective mesh repair.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Our study highlights the need for clinical vigilance in high-energy trauma cases and the use of CT in diagnosis. Although trauma laparotomy is essential for suspected intra-abdominal injury, select hemodynamically stable patients may be safely managed non-operatively.</p><p><strong>Level of evidence: </strong>III, diagnostic test/criteria.</p>","PeriodicalId":23307,"journal":{"name":"Trauma Surgery & Acute Care Open","volume":"10 4","pages":"e001759"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2,"publicationDate":"2025-10-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12581080/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145445984","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-10-29eCollection Date: 2025-01-01DOI: 10.1136/tsaco-2025-001950
Joshua Dilday, Elliott R Haut, Kimberly Hendershot
{"title":"Readability is responsibility: ensuring firearm safety educational materials are on target.","authors":"Joshua Dilday, Elliott R Haut, Kimberly Hendershot","doi":"10.1136/tsaco-2025-001950","DOIUrl":"10.1136/tsaco-2025-001950","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":23307,"journal":{"name":"Trauma Surgery & Acute Care Open","volume":"10 4","pages":"e001950"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2,"publicationDate":"2025-10-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12574364/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145431555","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Background: The trauma triad of death, consisting of hypothermia, acidosis, and coagulopathy, has long been recognized as a major cause of mortality in trauma patients. Recently, hypocalcemia has emerged as a fourth component that plays a critical role in the prognosis of these patients. The objective of this meta-analysis is to evaluate the association between hypocalcemia and mortality among trauma patients.
Methods: The authors systematically reviewed studies published in English from OVID, EMBASE, and Cochrane databases between January 1, 2000 and October 31, 2024. Randomized controlled trials and cohort studies reporting mortality rates among trauma patients with hypocalcemia were included. A meta-analysis was conducted using random effects models. The methodological quality of the studies was assessed using the Cochrane risk of bias tool.
Results: Of the 4,209 studies identified, 20 were included in the meta-analysis. Trauma patients with hypocalcemia had a statistically significant increase in mortality (OR 2.79; 95% CI 2.01 to 3.89). This increase in mortality was also observed in subgroup analysis based on the timing of calcium level measurement: before blood transfusion (OR 2.45; 95% CI 1.75 to 3.43; I2=59%), before or after blood transfusion (OR 1.61; 95% CI 1.26 to 2.05; I2=0%), and no available data on the timing of calcium level measurement (OR 3.97; 95% CI 2.24 to 7.02; I2=78%). Notably, hypocalcemia was associated with increased mortality regardless of whether calcium levels were measured before or after blood transfusion. In terms of hypocalcemia severity, we found that more severe hypocalcemia was associated with higher mortality.
Conclusions: Hypocalcemia in trauma patients is associated with increased mortality. We suggest that hypocalcemia should be closely monitored regardless of the transfusion history.
背景:低体温、酸中毒和凝血功能障碍是创伤患者死亡的主要原因。最近,低钙血症已成为第四个因素,在这些患者的预后中起着关键作用。本荟萃分析的目的是评估创伤患者低钙血症与死亡率之间的关系。方法:作者系统地回顾了2000年1月1日至2024年10月31日期间在OVID、EMBASE和Cochrane数据库中发表的英文研究。随机对照试验和队列研究报告了创伤患者低钙血症的死亡率。采用随机效应模型进行meta分析。使用Cochrane偏倚风险工具评估研究的方法学质量。结果:在确定的4209项研究中,有20项纳入了meta分析。低钙血症的创伤患者死亡率有统计学意义的增加(OR 2.79; 95% CI 2.01 ~ 3.89)。在基于钙水平测量时间的亚组分析中也观察到死亡率的增加:输血前(OR 2.45; 95% CI 1.75至3.43;I2=59%),输血前后(OR 1.61; 95% CI 1.26至2.05;I2=0%),没有关于钙水平测量时间的可用数据(OR 3.97; 95% CI 2.24至7.02;I2=78%)。值得注意的是,无论在输血前还是输血后测量钙水平,低钙血症都与死亡率增加有关。就低钙严重程度而言,我们发现低钙严重程度越高,死亡率越高。结论:创伤患者的低钙血症与死亡率增加有关。我们建议无论输血史如何,都应密切监测低钙血症。试验注册号:INPLASY号,202330116。
{"title":"Association between hypocalcemia and mortality in trauma patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis.","authors":"Visarat Palitnonkiat, Tharin Thampongsa, Jatuporn Sirikun, Natthida Owattanapanich","doi":"10.1136/tsaco-2025-001800","DOIUrl":"10.1136/tsaco-2025-001800","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The trauma triad of death, consisting of hypothermia, acidosis, and coagulopathy, has long been recognized as a major cause of mortality in trauma patients. Recently, hypocalcemia has emerged as a fourth component that plays a critical role in the prognosis of these patients. The objective of this meta-analysis is to evaluate the association between hypocalcemia and mortality among trauma patients.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The authors systematically reviewed studies published in English from OVID, EMBASE, and Cochrane databases between January 1, 2000 and October 31, 2024. Randomized controlled trials and cohort studies reporting mortality rates among trauma patients with hypocalcemia were included. A meta-analysis was conducted using random effects models. The methodological quality of the studies was assessed using the Cochrane risk of bias tool.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of the 4,209 studies identified, 20 were included in the meta-analysis. Trauma patients with hypocalcemia had a statistically significant increase in mortality (OR 2.79; 95% CI 2.01 to 3.89). This increase in mortality was also observed in subgroup analysis based on the timing of calcium level measurement: before blood transfusion (OR 2.45; 95% CI 1.75 to 3.43; I2=59%), before or after blood transfusion (OR 1.61; 95% CI 1.26 to 2.05; I2=0%), and no available data on the timing of calcium level measurement (OR 3.97; 95% CI 2.24 to 7.02; I2=78%). Notably, hypocalcemia was associated with increased mortality regardless of whether calcium levels were measured before or after blood transfusion. In terms of hypocalcemia severity, we found that more severe hypocalcemia was associated with higher mortality.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Hypocalcemia in trauma patients is associated with increased mortality. We suggest that hypocalcemia should be closely monitored regardless of the transfusion history.</p><p><strong>Trial registration number: </strong>INPLASY number, 202330116.</p>","PeriodicalId":23307,"journal":{"name":"Trauma Surgery & Acute Care Open","volume":"10 4","pages":"e001800"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2,"publicationDate":"2025-10-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12574344/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145432205","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-10-29eCollection Date: 2025-01-01DOI: 10.1136/tsaco-2025-001814
Ravi R Rajani, Fulton F Velez, Tyler Knight, Laura Kauffman, Luigi Pascarella, Daniel C Malone, Todd E Rasmussen, Laura E Niklason, Shamik Parikh
Background: To evaluate the short-term clinical performance of Symvess (acellular tissue engineered vessel-tyod), formerly known as human acellular vessel, or HAV, compared with autologous vein for the treatment of extremity arterial injury.
Methods: Subjects treated with acellular tissue engineered vessel (ATEV) from two clinical trials were propensity score-matched on a 1:2 basis to PROspective Observational Vascular Injury Trial (PROOVIT) registry subjects with the same injured artery and treated with autologous vein. Matching characteristics included age, sex, trauma type (penetrating vs blunt), injury severity score, mangled extremity severity score, concomitant fracture, shunt use, and ischemia duration>6 hours. Incidence of outcomes (primary/secondary patency, amputation, conduit infection, reintervention for thrombosis/stenosis, pseudoaneurysm, and death) was assessed by a generalized linear model. Outcomes were assessed at Day 30 (ATEV group) or during initial hospitalization (autologous group).
Results: ATEV subjects lacking suitable autologous vein (n=67) and PROOVIT subjects treated with autologous vein (n=134) suffered injuries to axillary, brachial, femoral, popliteal, and posterior tibial arteries. Subgroups were clinically similar; Injury Severity Score, Mangled Extremity Severity Score, and duration of follow-up (16 vs 30 days) were higher for the ATEV subgroup.Primary patency for the ATEV versus autologous group was 86.6% versus 91.8%, secondary patency: 91.0% versus 97.7%; amputation: 7.5% versus 8.2%; conduit infection: 1.5% versus 0%; reintervention for thrombosis or stenosis: 6.0% versus 8.2%; and death 4.5% versus 4.5%, respectively. No cases of pseudoaneurysm, true aneurysm, or significant differences between the ATEV and autologous groups for any outcome were observed.
Conclusions: Short-term outcomes were similar between ATEV subjects without feasible autologous vein, and propensity score-matched autologous vein recipients from the PROOVIT registry. The ATEV may provide effective and safe revascularization in subjects with extremity arterial injury without feasible autologous vein.
Level of evidence: Level 3, Therapeutic/Care Management.
背景:评价Symvess(脱细胞组织工程血管类型)(以前称为人脱细胞血管,或HAV)与自体静脉治疗四肢动脉损伤的短期临床表现。方法:两项临床试验的脱细胞组织工程血管(ATEV)治疗的受试者与前瞻性观察性血管损伤试验(provit)登记的具有相同损伤动脉并使用自体静脉治疗的受试者按1:2的倾向评分匹配。匹配的特征包括年龄、性别、创伤类型(穿透性还是钝性)、损伤严重程度评分、四肢残缺严重程度评分、合并骨折、分流术使用和缺血持续时间bbb6小时。结果的发生率(原发性/继发性通畅、截肢、导管感染、血栓/狭窄再干预、假性动脉瘤和死亡)通过广义线性模型进行评估。在第30天(ATEV组)或首次住院(自体组)评估结果。结果:缺乏合适自体静脉的ATEV组(67例)和采用自体静脉治疗的provit组(134例)腋窝动脉、肱动脉、股动脉、腘动脉和胫后动脉均有损伤。亚组临床相似;ATEV亚组的损伤严重程度评分、四肢损伤严重程度评分和随访时间(16天vs 30天)更高。ATEV组与自体组的原发性通畅率分别为86.6%和91.8%,继发性通畅率分别为91.0%和97.7%;截肢:7.5% vs 8.2%;导管感染:1.5% vs 0%;血栓形成或狭窄再干预:6.0%对8.2%;死亡率分别为4.5%和4.5%没有假性动脉瘤、真性动脉瘤的病例,也没有观察到ATEV组和自体组在任何结果上的显著差异。结论:在没有可行的自体静脉的ATEV受试者和provit登记的倾向评分匹配的自体静脉接受者之间,短期结果相似。对于无自体静脉的肢体动脉损伤患者,ATEV可提供安全有效的血运重建术。证据等级:3级,治疗/护理管理。
{"title":"Short-term performance of Symvess (acellular tissue engineered vessel-tyod) compared to external control data for autologous vein in treatment of extremity arterial injury.","authors":"Ravi R Rajani, Fulton F Velez, Tyler Knight, Laura Kauffman, Luigi Pascarella, Daniel C Malone, Todd E Rasmussen, Laura E Niklason, Shamik Parikh","doi":"10.1136/tsaco-2025-001814","DOIUrl":"10.1136/tsaco-2025-001814","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>To evaluate the short-term clinical performance of Symvess (acellular tissue engineered vessel-tyod), formerly known as human acellular vessel, or HAV, compared with autologous vein for the treatment of extremity arterial injury.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Subjects treated with acellular tissue engineered vessel (ATEV) from two clinical trials were propensity score-matched on a 1:2 basis to PROspective Observational Vascular Injury Trial (PROOVIT) registry subjects with the same injured artery and treated with autologous vein. Matching characteristics included age, sex, trauma type (penetrating vs blunt), injury severity score, mangled extremity severity score, concomitant fracture, shunt use, and ischemia duration>6 hours. Incidence of outcomes (primary/secondary patency, amputation, conduit infection, reintervention for thrombosis/stenosis, pseudoaneurysm, and death) was assessed by a generalized linear model. Outcomes were assessed at Day 30 (ATEV group) or during initial hospitalization (autologous group).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>ATEV subjects lacking suitable autologous vein (n=67) and PROOVIT subjects treated with autologous vein (n=134) suffered injuries to axillary, brachial, femoral, popliteal, and posterior tibial arteries. Subgroups were clinically similar; Injury Severity Score, Mangled Extremity Severity Score, and duration of follow-up (16 vs 30 days) were higher for the ATEV subgroup.Primary patency for the ATEV versus autologous group was 86.6% versus 91.8%, secondary patency: 91.0% versus 97.7%; amputation: 7.5% versus 8.2%; conduit infection: 1.5% versus 0%; reintervention for thrombosis or stenosis: 6.0% versus 8.2%; and death 4.5% versus 4.5%, respectively. No cases of pseudoaneurysm, true aneurysm, or significant differences between the ATEV and autologous groups for any outcome were observed.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Short-term outcomes were similar between ATEV subjects without feasible autologous vein, and propensity score-matched autologous vein recipients from the PROOVIT registry. The ATEV may provide effective and safe revascularization in subjects with extremity arterial injury without feasible autologous vein.</p><p><strong>Level of evidence: </strong>Level 3, Therapeutic/Care Management.</p>","PeriodicalId":23307,"journal":{"name":"Trauma Surgery & Acute Care Open","volume":"10 4","pages":"e001814"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2,"publicationDate":"2025-10-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12574343/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145431815","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-10-29eCollection Date: 2025-01-01DOI: 10.1136/tsaco-2024-001629
Kristina Fuller, Samuel Tisherman, Lorreen Agandi, Kristin A Madenci, Adam C Puche
Background: Exsanguinating hemorrhage is the leading cause of death in combat casualty care. With improvement in body armor, risk for extremity injuries is increasingly making surgical control of vessels and extremity fasciotomies critically important for saving life and/or limb. Yet, surgeon hands-on experience with major trauma has decreased. In military settings, with limited surgical resources, surgeons could be required to work independently and outside their scope of expertise. We explored whether just-in-time skill refreshment with video review improves performance of selected procedures.
Methods: Surgeons (n=44) performed upper and lower extremity fasciotomies and axillary and femoral artery exposures on anatomic donors. They were divided into two groups: one group received Surgical Technical Assistance Tool (STAT) video procedure assistance and the other received no assistance (control group). Performance was evaluated using a five-component (anatomy, pathophysiology, patient management, technical skills, and procedural) Individual Procedure Score (IPS). The total number of compartment decompressions/constriction releases (maximum 10, combined fasciotomy procedures) and number of vessels controlled (maximum of four, combined vascular procedures) were measured. Each compartment decompression/constriction release and each vessel controlled are also single data points within the IPS.
Results: In combined fasciotomies, STAT significantly improved the number of successful compartment decompressions/constriction releases as well as procedural, anatomy, and technical IPS components. In combined vascular procedures, STAT improved anatomy IPS, but not the number of vessels successfully controlled. For successful compartment decompression/constriction release, there was a significant linear correlation with procedural, anatomy, and technical IPS components. For successful vascular control, there was a significant linear correlation with procedural and technical IPS components. There was no correlation between success and pathophysiology or patient management scores.
Conclusion: A video-based, just-in-time refresher tool can dramatically improve procedural success and performance scores in procedural, anatomy, and technical components during trauma-related extremity procedures.
Level of evidence: Level II, Original Research, Therapeutic/Care Management.
{"title":"Efficacy of a video refresher surgical technical assistance tool on surgeon performance of fasciotomies and proximal vascular control.","authors":"Kristina Fuller, Samuel Tisherman, Lorreen Agandi, Kristin A Madenci, Adam C Puche","doi":"10.1136/tsaco-2024-001629","DOIUrl":"10.1136/tsaco-2024-001629","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Exsanguinating hemorrhage is the leading cause of death in combat casualty care. With improvement in body armor, risk for extremity injuries is increasingly making surgical control of vessels and extremity fasciotomies critically important for saving life and/or limb. Yet, surgeon hands-on experience with major trauma has decreased. In military settings, with limited surgical resources, surgeons could be required to work independently and outside their scope of expertise. We explored whether just-in-time skill refreshment with video review improves performance of selected procedures.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Surgeons (n=44) performed upper and lower extremity fasciotomies and axillary and femoral artery exposures on anatomic donors. They were divided into two groups: one group received Surgical Technical Assistance Tool (STAT) video procedure assistance and the other received no assistance (control group). Performance was evaluated using a five-component (anatomy, pathophysiology, patient management, technical skills, and procedural) Individual Procedure Score (IPS). The total number of compartment decompressions/constriction releases (maximum 10, combined fasciotomy procedures) and number of vessels controlled (maximum of four, combined vascular procedures) were measured. Each compartment decompression/constriction release and each vessel controlled are also single data points within the IPS.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In combined fasciotomies, STAT significantly improved the number of successful compartment decompressions/constriction releases as well as procedural, anatomy, and technical IPS components. In combined vascular procedures, STAT improved anatomy IPS, but not the number of vessels successfully controlled. For successful compartment decompression/constriction release, there was a significant linear correlation with procedural, anatomy, and technical IPS components. For successful vascular control, there was a significant linear correlation with procedural and technical IPS components. There was no correlation between success and pathophysiology or patient management scores.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>A video-based, just-in-time refresher tool can dramatically improve procedural success and performance scores in procedural, anatomy, and technical components during trauma-related extremity procedures.</p><p><strong>Level of evidence: </strong>Level II, Original Research, Therapeutic/Care Management.</p>","PeriodicalId":23307,"journal":{"name":"Trauma Surgery & Acute Care Open","volume":"10 4","pages":"e001629"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2,"publicationDate":"2025-10-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12574389/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145432170","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-10-28eCollection Date: 2025-01-01DOI: 10.1136/tsaco-2025-001873
Sebastian Kirdar-Smith, Alec Knight, Ricardo Twumasi
Background: Burnout is increasingly recognized as a critical occupational issue impacting physician well-being and patient care. Although surgeons are known to experience high burnout rates, the specific burden among trauma surgeons remains poorly researched. This systematic review and meta-analysis focuses on burnout exclusively among trauma surgeons. We aim to analyze the prevalence of burnout among trauma surgeons and identify associated factors by analyzing their alleviating and exacerbating influences through systematic review, meta-analysis, and meta-regression.
Methods: Following PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses) and MOOSE (Meta-analysis of Observational Studies in Epidemiology) guidelines, we used a combination of searching databases, individual journals and cross-referencing. Two independent reviewers screened studies measuring burnout in trauma surgeons. A random-effects meta-analysis was performed using logit-transformed proportions. Heterogeneity was assessed using I² statistics and meta-regression examined the impact of measurement tools.
Results: Analysis of 19 studies (n=4,634) revealed a pooled burnout prevalence of 60.0% (95% CI 46.9% to 74.4%) with substantial heterogeneity (I²=97.9%, p<0.0001). Studies using the Maslach Burnout Inventory (n=13) showed high emotional exhaustion (35.2%) and depersonalization (45.6%), but maintained strong personal accomplishment (75.3%). Key burnout-exacerbating factors included younger age, long working hours, and administrative burden, whereas protective factors included mentorship and protected non-clinical time.
Conclusions: Trauma surgeons experience among the highest burnout rates reported among surgical specialties, warranting systemic physician-centric interventions, with a shift in focus from diagnosis to prevention. Despite significant occupational stressors, persistently high personal accomplishment levels suggest specialty-specific resilience factors, meriting further investigation. Evidence-based strategies, including formal mentorship programs, psychological risk management models, and protected non-clinical time have the potential to mitigate burnout.
背景:职业倦怠越来越被认为是影响医生福祉和患者护理的关键职业问题。尽管外科医生的职业倦怠率很高,但对创伤外科医生的具体负担的研究仍然很少。本系统综述和荟萃分析的重点是创伤外科医生的职业倦怠。我们的目的是分析创伤外科医生职业倦怠的患病率,并通过系统回顾、荟萃分析和荟萃回归分析其缓解和加剧的影响,确定相关因素。方法:遵循PRISMA(首选系统评价和荟萃分析报告项目)和MOOSE(流行病学观察性研究荟萃分析)指南,我们采用检索数据库、单个期刊和交叉参考相结合的方法。两名独立审稿人筛选了测量创伤外科医生职业倦怠的研究。随机效应荟萃分析采用对数变换比例进行。异质性评估使用I²统计和元回归检查测量工具的影响。结果:对19项研究(n=4,634)的分析显示,总倦怠率为60.0% (95% CI 46.9%至74.4%),存在显著异质性(I²=97.9%)。结论:创伤外科医生的倦怠率是外科专业中最高的,需要以医生为中心的系统性干预,将重点从诊断转向预防。尽管存在显著的职业压力因素,但持续高的个人成就水平表明了特殊的弹性因素,值得进一步研究。循证策略,包括正式的指导计划、心理风险管理模型和受保护的非临床时间,都有可能减轻职业倦怠。
{"title":"Burnout among trauma surgeons: a systematic review and meta-analysis.","authors":"Sebastian Kirdar-Smith, Alec Knight, Ricardo Twumasi","doi":"10.1136/tsaco-2025-001873","DOIUrl":"10.1136/tsaco-2025-001873","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Burnout is increasingly recognized as a critical occupational issue impacting physician well-being and patient care. Although surgeons are known to experience high burnout rates, the specific burden among trauma surgeons remains poorly researched. This systematic review and meta-analysis focuses on burnout exclusively among trauma surgeons. We aim to analyze the prevalence of burnout among trauma surgeons and identify associated factors by analyzing their alleviating and exacerbating influences through systematic review, meta-analysis, and meta-regression.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Following PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses) and MOOSE (Meta-analysis of Observational Studies in Epidemiology) guidelines, we used a combination of searching databases, individual journals and cross-referencing. Two independent reviewers screened studies measuring burnout in trauma surgeons. A random-effects meta-analysis was performed using logit-transformed proportions. Heterogeneity was assessed using I² statistics and meta-regression examined the impact of measurement tools.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Analysis of 19 studies (n=4,634) revealed a pooled burnout prevalence of 60.0% (95% CI 46.9% to 74.4%) with substantial heterogeneity (I²=97.9%, p<0.0001). Studies using the Maslach Burnout Inventory (n=13) showed high emotional exhaustion (35.2%) and depersonalization (45.6%), but maintained strong personal accomplishment (75.3%). Key burnout-exacerbating factors included younger age, long working hours, and administrative burden, whereas protective factors included mentorship and protected non-clinical time.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Trauma surgeons experience among the highest burnout rates reported among surgical specialties, warranting systemic physician-centric interventions, with a shift in focus from diagnosis to prevention. Despite significant occupational stressors, persistently high personal accomplishment levels suggest specialty-specific resilience factors, meriting further investigation. Evidence-based strategies, including formal mentorship programs, psychological risk management models, and protected non-clinical time have the potential to mitigate burnout.</p>","PeriodicalId":23307,"journal":{"name":"Trauma Surgery & Acute Care Open","volume":"10 4","pages":"e001873"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2,"publicationDate":"2025-10-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12570958/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145410043","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}