Zentralblatt fur Chirurgie最新文献

Background: Findings from two recently published randomised controlled trials have shown favourable oncological results of segmentectomy for early-stage NSCLC < 2 cm. This has generated a growing interest in this procedure, which is however considered technically more challenging than lobectomy. The aim of the working group of the German Society for Thoracic Surgery (DGT) was to address, via an expert consensus project, topics concerning implementation of segmentectomy in lung cancer surgery.

Methods: The assigned group of the DGT designed and conducted two electronic rounds of questions in all major thoracic and lung cancer centres in Germany. The steering group predefined a priori the threshold of consensus of 75% or greater. The results were discussed in an expert meeting, leading to a final Delphi poll for selected topics and questions.

Results: Thirty-eight questions on segmentectomy for NSCLC were proposed in two rounds and voted on. After the final Delphi process, a consensus was reached for the following topics: non-inferiority of segmentectomy vs. lobectomy for tumours < 2 cm, segmentectomy as an alternative if lobectomy is functionally not feasible, use of intraoperative techniques for identification of intersegmental borders. No consensus could be reached for topics such as frozen section for intraoperative ascertainment of radicality, as also for the indication of a re-do lobectomy in case of an occult N1 lymph node status.

Conclusion: Our manuscript depicts the results of a Delphi process in 2020/2021 involving experts of the German Society for Thoracic Surgery on the implementation of segmentectomy in lung cancer patients. In general, a very high rate of consensus was documented for the majority of the topics concerning the indication and execution of lung segmentectomy.

If thoracic surgery is to remain an attractive career path for young physicians, it is essential to provide opportunities to balance work, residency, and family time. With an increasing proportion of women in thoracic surgery, it has become increasingly important to create a work environment that allows safe employment during pregnancy and breast feeding becomes an important concern.Based on the legal requirements of the German Maternity Protection Act (Mutterschutzgesetz), this interdisciplinary consensus paper was developed by representatives of thoracic surgery, anaesthesiology, and occupational medicine.The vast majority of thoracic operations can be performed by pregnant or breast-feeding surgeons. We established a risk-stratified list of operations with potentially acceptable risk, and a list of operations that pregnant or breast-feeding surgeons should not perform. A checklist aims to aid the individual implementation of thoracic surgery during pregnancy and breast feeding.Thoracic surgery can be performed by pregnant or breast-feeding surgeons when certain protective measures are observed. The prerequisite is the voluntary and independent decision of the surgeon, and the implementation of safety precautions by the employer.

In modern perioperative care concepts, multimodal ERAS (Enhanced Recovery After Surgery) is a multimodal perioperative treatment concept for improving postoperative recovery of surgical patients after an operation. This is managed by the so-called ERAS Society and through which hospitals can also be officially certified. The focus of the ERAS concept is on uniform patient care from admission to discharge, with the aim of improving perioperative processes by implementing evidence-based protocols involving a multidisciplinary treatment team. In 2019, ERAS guidelines were published for the first time by the European Society of Thoracic Surgery (ESTS), in cooperation with the ERAS Society, for specific lung resection procedures, and these identified a total of 45 graduated recommendations or Enhanced Recovery Pathways (ERP). The implementation of ERAS concepts in thoracic surgery (ERATS = Enhanced Recovery After Thoracic Surgery) is intended to establish standardised perioperative procedures based on study results and/or expert recommendations. These recommendations take into account organisational aspects as well as thoracic surgical and anaesthesiological procedures, with the overriding goal of creating a structured treatment plan tailored to the patient. All these measures should result in a multimodal overall concept, which should primarily lead to an improved outcome after elective thoracic surgery and secondarily to shorter hospital stays with correspondingly lower costs.This review article describes basic ERAS principles and provides a compact presentation of the most important European ERAS recommendations from the authors' point of view, together with typical obstacles to the implementation of the corresponding ERATS program in German thoracic surgery.

About one third of all colorectal carcinomas (CRC) are localised in the rectum. As part of a multimodal therapy concept, neoadjuvant therapy achieves downstaging of the tumour in 50-60% of cases and a so-called complete clinical response (cCR), defined as clinically (and radiologically) undetectable residual tumour after completion of neoadjuvant therapy, in 10-30% of cases.In view of the perioperative morbidity and mortality associated with radical rectal resection, including the occurrence of a symptom complex known as low anterior resection syndrome (LARS) and the need for deviation, at least temporarily, the question of the risk-benefit balance of organ resection in the presence of cCR has been raised. In this context, the therapeutic concept of a "watch-and-wait" approach with omission of immediate organ resection and inclusion in a structured surveillance regime, has emerged.For a safe, oncological implementation of this option, it is necessary to develop standards in the definition of a suitable patient clientele and the implementation of the concept. In addition to the initial correct selection of the patient group that is suitable for a primarily non-surgical procedure, the inherent goal is the early and sufficient detection of tumour recurrence (so-called local regrowth) during the "watch-and-wait" phase (surveillance).In this context, in this paper we address the questions of: 1. the optimal timing of initial re-staging, 2. the criteria for assessing the clinical response and selecting the appropriate patient clientele, 3. the rhythm and design of the surveillance protocol.

Chylothorax is a serious and potentially life-threatening condition of diverse etiology. This article provides a detailed overview of anatomy, physiology, etiology, diagnosis, and therapeutic options in the context of chylothorax.

Background: In Germany, nosocomial infections and postoperative wound infections are a significant burden for the healthcare system and the patients affected. A postoperative wound infection is often accompanied by a massive deterioration in the quality of the treatment success of surgical measures in terms of patient stress, the functional results and the cost-effectiveness of a treatment for the service provider. The aim of this article is to present the current hygiene requirements for the perioperative setting in a comprehensible manner and to explain them to everyone involved in the surgical procedure.

Method: First of all, the importance of hygienic measures is explained, as well as a brief overview of the development up to modern hygiene concepts of today. Then the current recommendations of the KRINKO (Commission for Hospital Hygiene and Infection Prevention at the Robert Koch Institute): "Prevention of postoperative wound infections, recommendation of the Commission for Hospital Hygiene and Infection Prevention (KRINKO) at the Robert Koch Institute" are presented.

Conclusion: Hygienic work is a basic prerequisite for work in the surgical area, because convincing treatment results with good functional results cannot be achieved in many areas (e.g. modern endoprosthetics) without sufficient hygiene. The modern requirements for hygienic work are complex and affect all areas of the hospital. The best possible degree of process quality can only be guaranteed if all pillars of modern hygiene concepts are observed.

Today, endoscopy plays a decisive role not only in the detection of colorectal adenomas and carcinomas, but also in the treatment of precancerous lesions, in particular flat adenomas and early carcinomas. In recent years, endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) has become increasingly important alongside classic polypectomy and mucosal resection after saline injection using a snare (EMR). Using ESD the lesion is marked, injected submucosally using viscous substances and the mucosa incised and tunneled with a transparent cap and a fine diathermy knife. Particularly in the case of widespread and high-risk lesions ESD enables a quasi-surgical "en bloc" resection almost regardless of size, with a histological R0 resection rate of far over 90% in specialized centers. ESD enables an excellent histopathological evaluation and has a low recurrence risk of 1-3%. Endoscopic full-thickness resection using a dedicated device (FTRD system) represents another addition to the armamentarium. It can be used for circumscribed submucosal, suspicious or scarred changes up to 2 cm in the middle and upper rectum. Endoscopic intermuscular dissection (EID) enables histopathological analysis of the complete submucosa beyond the mucosa and upper submucosal layer by including the circular inner muscle layer within the resection specimen. It reduces basal R1 situations and offers a new perspective for T1 carcinomas through curative, organ-preserving endoscopic therapy, especially in the case of deep submucosal infiltration alone, without other risk factors for metastases. Indications, the procedure itself and significance of the various techniques for premalignant and early malignant lesions in the rectum are presented.

The review titled "Staging and Diagnostics of Rectal Cancer" aims to provide insight to imaging techniques in patients with rectal cancer.Rectal cancer is among the most common malignancies, with one of the highest mortality rates worldwide. Timely diagnosis and therapy of this cancer therefore has important socio-economic implications.Radiological imaging plays a major role in the planning of subsequent therapy. Modern tomographic imaging is used not only for initial diagnosis, but also for staging.The individual role of different imaging techniques in diagnosis of rectal cancer will be explained in detail, and their function in general. Furthermore, we will present relevant radiological research related.The increasing role of MRI-based local staging will be presented in detail in this review. Defined diagnostic criteria, based on common recommendations, will be explained. We will show how MRI-based local staging can support the initial diagnosis and follow-up examinations in collaboration with other medical specialties in therapeutic planning. In particular, we describe how MRI is capable of substantially influencing the determination of surgical procedures in rectal cancer.