ZFA. Zeitschrift fur Allgemeinmedizin最新文献

We understand clinical quality governance (CQG) as quality management in the clinical domain. In 2020, presumably due to the coronavirus pandemic, more patients requested to be vaccinated against influenza as compared to previous years so that it became apparent that there would be a shortage for high-risk patients. To meet the problem, we started a CQG process. This article is explicitly not a research article but an exemplary description of a CQG process intended as a stimulus and for discussion. We initiated the following process: (1) evaluation of the present state, (2) patients who already had requested a vaccination were prioritized and vaccinated first, and (3) contacting via telephone and vaccination of high-risk patients not on the list. We chose patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) older than 60 years as an indicator for the group of highest priority. In the beginning only 3 (8%) of our 38 patients with COPD were vaccinated against influenza. After prioritization and vaccination of the high-risk collective in the list of those who had requested to be vaccinated, 25 (66%) of our 38 patients with COPD were vaccinated. After a phone call of high-risk patients not on the list, 28 (74%) patients were vaccinated. This represents an increase of vaccination coverage from 8% to 74% which is close to the rate recommended by the World Health Organization (WHO). In times of a pandemic, family physicians occasionally have to deal with a scarcity of resources and have to develop strategies for fair resource allocation. Not only in this context is CQG worth the effort. The generation of list queries could be improved by the providers of electronic patient records.

[This corrects the article DOI: 10.1007/s44266-023-00027-1.].

Background: Fatigue is one of the most common reasons for seeking medical counseling in the family medicine (FM), often entailing diagnostic uncertainty. Patients use terms describing emotional, cognitive, physical, and behavioral aspects. A number of biological, mental, and social causes may underlie the symptom of fatigue, often in combination. This guideline describes the procedures to be applied for primary undetermined symptomatology.

Methods: The experts involved conducted a systematic search using the terms for fatigue in the context of FM in PubMed, Cochrane Library and via manual search. Concerning related guidelines, the National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE) guideline was used for myalgic encephalitis/chronic fatigue syndrome (ME/CFS). In a structured consensus process, broad approval of the core recommendations/background text of the revised guideline was attained.

Most important messages: 1) Alongside gathering information concerning the symptom characteristics, the anamnesis aims to collect information about pre-existing health conditions, sleeping behavior, use of drugs and psychosocial factors. 2) Depression and anxiety as two common causes will be identified based on screening questions. The occurrence of post-exertional malaise (PEM) will be inquired. 3) The following basic diagnostics are recommended: physical examination, laboratory tests (blood glucose, full blood count, blood sedimentation/CRP, transaminases/γ-GT, TSH). 4) Further examinations should be conducted only in case of specific indications. 5) A biopsychosocial approach is to be adopted. 6) Behavioral therapy and symptom-oriented activating measures can improve fatigue in underlying diseases and undetermined fatigue. 7) In case of PEM, further ME/CFS criteria should be collected and patients have to be supervised accordingly.

Background: Since the beginning of the war in Ukraine, more than 7.6 million people from Ukraine have been registered as refugees in European countries. In Germany, the number is estimated to be more than 1 million. These refugees may have different health needs than German patients due to differences in the health care system, disease prevalence, preventive measures, health behavior, and experiences of flight. However, general practitioners (GPs) have hardly been prepared for the contact.

Objectives: For the first time, challenges in the treatment of Ukrainian refugees and support needs of German GPs were determined.

Materials and methods: In July and August 2022, a cross-sectional study among GPs in Germany was conducted using an online survey.

Results: A total of 82 GPs participated with a response rate of 16.0%; 52 of the participating GPs had treated Ukrainian refugees in the previous 2 weeks. In all, 75.0% of them reported difficulties or peculiarities in care, especially in communication (61.5%), due to lack of information about previous illnesses (34.6%), and expectations of services to be provided (30.8%). Of the 82 participants, 59.8% reported a need for multilingual information for patients, especially about the German health care system, help with mental health problems, contact points, and differences in the use of medications. Information for the practice team is needed in 37.8% of cases, especially on possibilities in case of language barriers, vaccination coverage in Ukraine, and dealing with missing vaccination records as well as drug lists.

Conclusions: Due to the new situation of Ukrainian refugees in Germany and the mentioned barriers, GPs should be supported in care. Information for practice teams as well as their networking with psychotherapeutic offers, contact points, drug databases, and regional interpreter services are urgently needed. However, multilingual information for Ukrainian patients should be disseminated in order to relieve the burden on practices, which have been under great strain, and to ensure continuity and quality of care.