Pub Date : 1900-01-01DOI: 10.5771/2193-7869-2021-2-185
B. Söhnlein
The article addresses the discussion on inherent rights of nature that is conducted on an international level by presenting reasons to assign subjective rights to non-human beings and attempting to refute objections against it. The article’s focal point is the question who could be a carrier of inherent rights of nature, which would be the content of such rights and which institutions could protect them.
{"title":"Eigenrechte der Natur – rechtsdogmatische und rechtspolitische Anmerkungen","authors":"B. Söhnlein","doi":"10.5771/2193-7869-2021-2-185","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.5771/2193-7869-2021-2-185","url":null,"abstract":"The article addresses the discussion on inherent rights of nature that is conducted on an international level by presenting reasons to assign subjective rights to non-human beings and attempting to refute objections against it. The article’s focal point is the question who could be a carrier of inherent rights of nature, which would be the content of such rights and which institutions could protect them.","PeriodicalId":275616,"journal":{"name":"Kritische Vierteljahresschrift für Gesetzgebung und Rechtswissenschaft","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"128881538","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 1900-01-01DOI: 10.5771/2193-7869-2019-1-5
Sabine K. Witting
Mit zunehmendem Zugang zum Internet hat sich das explorative Verhalten von Kindern zu Sexualität auch auf den Onlinebereich ausgeweitet. Dies führte zu einer Wiederbelebung der moralischen Panik rund um die kindliche Sexualität, insbesondere in Bezug auf das wachsende Phänomen des einvernehmlichen „Sextings“ zwischen Minderjährigen. Diese moralische Panik wird durch die Sorge um sexuellen Missbrauch und sexuelle Ausbeutung von Kindern im Kontext von „Kinderpornographie“ noch weiter befeuert. In dem Bestreben, Kinder vor solchen Straftaten zu schützen, wird einvernehmliches „Sexting“ zwischen Minderjährigen in manchen Ländern als Produktion und Verbreitung von „Kinderpornographie“ gewertet und führt so zur Strafverfolgung beteiligter Kinder als SexualstraftäterInnen. Das Recht auf Schutz vor sexuellem Missbrauch und Ausbeutung ist hier das dominierende Narrativ. Dieser Artikel argumentiert, dass die Kriminalisierung von Kindern aufgrund einvernehmlicher sexueller Erkundungen im Online-Raum kontraproduktiv für das Ziel des Kinderschutzes ist. Stattdessen sollten Länder in Fällen von einvernehmlichen „Sexting“ zwischen Minderjährigen einen auf Rechten basierenden Ansatz verfolgen und die widerstreitenden Interessen von Autonomie und Kinderschutz dadurch ausgleichen, dass sie das einvernehmliche „Sexting“ zwischen Minderjährigen aus dem Geltungsbereich der „Kinderpornografie“ ausschließen.
{"title":"Regulating bodies: the moral panic of child sexuality in the digital era","authors":"Sabine K. Witting","doi":"10.5771/2193-7869-2019-1-5","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.5771/2193-7869-2019-1-5","url":null,"abstract":"Mit zunehmendem Zugang zum Internet hat sich das explorative Verhalten von Kindern zu Sexualität auch auf den Onlinebereich ausgeweitet. Dies führte zu einer Wiederbelebung der moralischen Panik rund um die kindliche Sexualität, insbesondere in Bezug auf das wachsende Phänomen des einvernehmlichen „Sextings“ zwischen Minderjährigen. Diese moralische Panik wird durch die Sorge um sexuellen Missbrauch und sexuelle Ausbeutung von Kindern im Kontext von „Kinderpornographie“ noch weiter befeuert. In dem Bestreben, Kinder vor solchen Straftaten zu schützen, wird einvernehmliches „Sexting“ zwischen Minderjährigen in manchen Ländern als Produktion und Verbreitung von „Kinderpornographie“ gewertet und führt so zur Strafverfolgung beteiligter Kinder als SexualstraftäterInnen. Das Recht auf Schutz vor sexuellem Missbrauch und Ausbeutung ist hier das dominierende Narrativ. Dieser Artikel argumentiert, dass die Kriminalisierung von Kindern aufgrund einvernehmlicher sexueller Erkundungen im Online-Raum kontraproduktiv für das Ziel des Kinderschutzes ist. Stattdessen sollten Länder in Fällen von einvernehmlichen „Sexting“ zwischen Minderjährigen einen auf Rechten basierenden Ansatz verfolgen und die widerstreitenden Interessen von Autonomie und Kinderschutz dadurch ausgleichen, dass sie das einvernehmliche „Sexting“ zwischen Minderjährigen aus dem Geltungsbereich der „Kinderpornografie“ ausschließen.","PeriodicalId":275616,"journal":{"name":"Kritische Vierteljahresschrift für Gesetzgebung und Rechtswissenschaft","volume":"44 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"122294151","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 1900-01-01DOI: 10.5771/2193-7869-2019-2-151
Natalie Alkiviadou
Der vorliegende Beitrag unterzieht die straf- und zivilrechtlichen Mittel einer kritischen Prüfung, die zur Bekämpfung der extremen Rechten in Griechenland zur Verfügung stehen. Dieses Phänomen dominiert der „Völkische Bund Goldene Morgenröte“ (Λαϊκός Σύνδεσμος-Χρυσή Αυγή), eine politische Partei, die gleichzeitig als gegen Immigranten, ethnische Minderheiten, LGBT-Personen und Antifaschisten gerichtete gewalttätige Bewegung in Erscheinung getreten ist.
{"title":"Challenging the Far-Right in Greece: A Critical Assessment of the Legal Framework","authors":"Natalie Alkiviadou","doi":"10.5771/2193-7869-2019-2-151","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.5771/2193-7869-2019-2-151","url":null,"abstract":"Der vorliegende Beitrag unterzieht die straf- und zivilrechtlichen Mittel einer kritischen Prüfung, die zur Bekämpfung der extremen Rechten in Griechenland zur Verfügung stehen. Dieses Phänomen dominiert der „Völkische Bund Goldene Morgenröte“ (Λαϊκός Σύνδεσμος-Χρυσή Αυγή), eine politische Partei, die gleichzeitig als gegen Immigranten, ethnische Minderheiten, LGBT-Personen und Antifaschisten gerichtete gewalttätige Bewegung in Erscheinung getreten ist.","PeriodicalId":275616,"journal":{"name":"Kritische Vierteljahresschrift für Gesetzgebung und Rechtswissenschaft","volume":"33 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"126914523","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 1900-01-01DOI: 10.5771/2193-7869-2020-1-6
Stefan Braum
{"title":"Éditorial","authors":"Stefan Braum","doi":"10.5771/2193-7869-2020-1-6","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.5771/2193-7869-2020-1-6","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":275616,"journal":{"name":"Kritische Vierteljahresschrift für Gesetzgebung und Rechtswissenschaft","volume":"9 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"127955011","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 1900-01-01DOI: 10.5771/2193-7869-2023-1-50
P. Albrecht, W. Naucke, G. Pfeifer
{"title":"Continuity and Ambivalence in Legal Scientific Working Methods","authors":"P. Albrecht, W. Naucke, G. Pfeifer","doi":"10.5771/2193-7869-2023-1-50","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.5771/2193-7869-2023-1-50","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":275616,"journal":{"name":"Kritische Vierteljahresschrift für Gesetzgebung und Rechtswissenschaft","volume":"37 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"126998165","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 1900-01-01DOI: 10.5771/2193-7869-2019-3-253
T. Klein, Katrin Treppschuh
Protocol No. 16 to the European Convention on Human Rights (ECHR), which came into force in August 2018, enables the member States to request the European Court of Human Rights to give advisory opinions on questions of principle relating to the interpretation and application of the rights and freedoms defined in the Convention and the Protocols thereto. The German Government does not consider it necessary to sign and ratify Protocol No. 16 at the moment referring to the well-developed constitutional protection of Human rights in Germany. This article critically assesses this view and argues that the possibility to apply to the Court for advisory opinions can contribute to making Human rights protection in Germany more effective.
{"title":"Effizienterer Menschenrechtsschutz durch Vorabbefassung des Europäischen Gerichtshofs für Menschenrechte?","authors":"T. Klein, Katrin Treppschuh","doi":"10.5771/2193-7869-2019-3-253","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.5771/2193-7869-2019-3-253","url":null,"abstract":"Protocol No. 16 to the European Convention on Human Rights (ECHR), which came into force in August 2018, enables the member States to request the European Court of Human Rights to give advisory opinions on questions of principle relating to the interpretation and application of the rights and freedoms defined in the Convention and the Protocols thereto. The German Government does not consider it necessary to sign and ratify Protocol No. 16 at the moment referring to the well-developed constitutional protection of Human rights in Germany. This article critically assesses this view and argues that the possibility to apply to the Court for advisory opinions can contribute to making Human rights protection in Germany more effective.","PeriodicalId":275616,"journal":{"name":"Kritische Vierteljahresschrift für Gesetzgebung und Rechtswissenschaft","volume":"42 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"125954731","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 1900-01-01DOI: 10.5771/2193-7869-2019-1-57
Lise Känner
In this paper, the author examines the effects that the judgment of the German Constitutional Court concerning the party ban in Art. 21 I GG (17 January 2017) had on government, legislator and society since it was rendered roughly two years ago. For this purpose, she illustrates the relevant changes of the procedural and substantive law of Art. 21 GG and analyses the historical and political background of those changes. She puts special emphasis on the influence that the case law of the ECHR had on the new interpretation of Art. 21 GG. In the end, she questions whether the judgment, which on the surface emphasises the importance of strengthening the freedom of political parties, is able to live up to it’s own standards in reality. For this, she studies to what extent state repression (also, and in particular illegal one) of political parties has increased during the time since the judgment.
{"title":"Das BVerfG zwischen Verfassungsinterpretation, europäischer Integration und politischer Positionierung – Eine Zwischenbilanz zum NPD-Verbotsurteil vom 17.1.2017","authors":"Lise Känner","doi":"10.5771/2193-7869-2019-1-57","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.5771/2193-7869-2019-1-57","url":null,"abstract":"In this paper, the author examines the effects that the judgment of the German Constitutional Court concerning the party ban in Art. 21 I GG (17 January 2017) had on government, legislator and society since it was rendered roughly two years ago. For this purpose, she illustrates the relevant changes of the procedural and substantive law of Art. 21 GG and analyses the historical and political background of those changes. She puts special emphasis on the influence that the case law of the ECHR had on the new interpretation of Art. 21 GG. In the end, she questions whether the judgment, which on the surface emphasises the importance of strengthening the freedom of political parties, is able to live up to it’s own standards in reality. For this, she studies to what extent state repression (also, and in particular illegal one) of political parties has increased during the time since the judgment.","PeriodicalId":275616,"journal":{"name":"Kritische Vierteljahresschrift für Gesetzgebung und Rechtswissenschaft","volume":"8 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"128205153","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 1900-01-01DOI: 10.5771/2193-7869-2022-4-367
G. Beestermöller
Nach Norbert Elias führt der Abstieg ehemals großmächtiger Nationen zu einer gravierenden Sinn- und Identitätskrise der betroffenen Völker und deren Eliten. Wenn sie zu Krieg Zuflucht suchen, dann nicht aus verwerflichen Motiven, sondern aus Gewissensnot. Daher geht jede manichäistische Interpretation der Auseinandersetzung um die Ukraine – die Guten gegen die Bösen – an der Realität vorbei. Wie kann man der Ukraine beistehen und zugleich Russland eine Perspektive eröffnen, in der das Leben wieder als sinnvoll erlebt wird?
{"title":"Wie könnte Frieden werden?","authors":"G. Beestermöller","doi":"10.5771/2193-7869-2022-4-367","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.5771/2193-7869-2022-4-367","url":null,"abstract":"Nach Norbert Elias führt der Abstieg ehemals großmächtiger Nationen zu einer gravierenden Sinn- und Identitätskrise der betroffenen Völker und deren Eliten. Wenn sie zu Krieg Zuflucht suchen, dann nicht aus verwerflichen Motiven, sondern aus Gewissensnot. Daher geht jede manichäistische Interpretation der Auseinandersetzung um die Ukraine – die Guten gegen die Bösen – an der Realität vorbei. Wie kann man der Ukraine beistehen und zugleich Russland eine Perspektive eröffnen, in der das Leben wieder als sinnvoll erlebt wird?","PeriodicalId":275616,"journal":{"name":"Kritische Vierteljahresschrift für Gesetzgebung und Rechtswissenschaft","volume":"42 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"124632957","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 1900-01-01DOI: 10.5771/2193-7869-2022-3-227
Ben Adolff
Based on an examination of the relevant UN-Documentation, this report identifies four notable instances of the topic of restitutions and reparations for victims of the Third Reich appearing as a topic of interest for UN bodies: the provisions made in the interest of refugees as part of the Paris Agreement, the discussion surrounding the draft of the Genocide Convention, as well as the legislative involvement of the International Refugee Organization (IRO) and the Secretary General of the UN (Sec-Gen) in the (later) Federal Republic of Germany (FRG). The funds created by the Paris Agreement are, probably, of the least interest, since they were conceived more as immediate relief than as individualized reparation. The discussion surrounding the Genocide Convention is interesting from a historical standpoint, as it attests an early and acute awareness of the underlying issues. However, any discussion addressing the restitution and reparation of victims of genocide did not find its way into the Convention. The involvement of the IRO with the Office of the Military Government for Germany, United States (OMGUS) and the FRG, which resulted in the drafting of specific laws on the matters of restitution and reparation, is perhaps the most interesting of the instances noted here. Potentially, the IRO played a significant role in the move towards restitution during the short years of its existence. Further investigations based on sources other than UN Documentation could reveal the extent to which the IRO was materially involved in the drafting of specific laws. The efforts of the Sec-Gen towards the reparation of victims of “medical” experimentation provides great insight into the process by which one such issue was discovered and addressed within the UN at the time. Beyond that, this is an instance in which there is a deeper understanding of the specific involvement of a UN-body with German reparatory legislation. In this case, it amounted to bringing up the issue and urging appropriate action without much involvement in the particulars of the resulting measures. Overall, it should be summarized that there was no consolidated or systematic effort towards the restitution of victims of the Third Reich on the parts of the UN. Rather, the issue appeared and reappeared with some frequency and only in certain cases did the UN take action.
{"title":"The topic of restitution in UN-Documentation following WW II","authors":"Ben Adolff","doi":"10.5771/2193-7869-2022-3-227","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.5771/2193-7869-2022-3-227","url":null,"abstract":"Based on an examination of the relevant UN-Documentation, this report identifies four notable instances of the topic of restitutions and reparations for victims of the Third Reich appearing as a topic of interest for UN bodies: the provisions made in the interest of refugees as part of the Paris Agreement, the discussion surrounding the draft of the Genocide Convention, as well as the legislative involvement of the International Refugee Organization (IRO) and the Secretary General of the UN (Sec-Gen) in the (later) Federal Republic of Germany (FRG). The funds created by the Paris Agreement are, probably, of the least interest, since they were conceived more as immediate relief than as individualized reparation. The discussion surrounding the Genocide Convention is interesting from a historical standpoint, as it attests an early and acute awareness of the underlying issues. However, any discussion addressing the restitution and reparation of victims of genocide did not find its way into the Convention. The involvement of the IRO with the Office of the Military Government for Germany, United States (OMGUS) and the FRG, which resulted in the drafting of specific laws on the matters of restitution and reparation, is perhaps the most interesting of the instances noted here. Potentially, the IRO played a significant role in the move towards restitution during the short years of its existence. Further investigations based on sources other than UN Documentation could reveal the extent to which the IRO was materially involved in the drafting of specific laws. The efforts of the Sec-Gen towards the reparation of victims of “medical” experimentation provides great insight into the process by which one such issue was discovered and addressed within the UN at the time. Beyond that, this is an instance in which there is a deeper understanding of the specific involvement of a UN-body with German reparatory legislation. In this case, it amounted to bringing up the issue and urging appropriate action without much involvement in the particulars of the resulting measures. Overall, it should be summarized that there was no consolidated or systematic effort towards the restitution of victims of the Third Reich on the parts of the UN. Rather, the issue appeared and reappeared with some frequency and only in certain cases did the UN take action.","PeriodicalId":275616,"journal":{"name":"Kritische Vierteljahresschrift für Gesetzgebung und Rechtswissenschaft","volume":"25 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"129688804","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 1900-01-01DOI: 10.5771/2193-7869-2019-2-93
Stefan Braum
La Commission européenne a présenté une proposition de règlement « relative aux injonctions européennes de production et de conservation de preuves électroniques en matière pénale ». Il est destiné à répondre aux lacunes alléguées dans l'application de la loi lors de la collecte d'éléments de preuve à partir de données stockées dans le « cloud ». La proposition représente un changement de paradigme puisque le principe de territorialité est remplacé par le principe du marché. Elle implique un changement d'orientation du droit procédural pénal européen, qui passe de la reconnaissance mutuelle et de la coopération judiciaire à l'accès unilatéral de l'exécutif aux éléments de preuve. Cela porte atteinte aux principes de protection des données. Mais au-delà de ses conséquences immédiates, la proposition est avant tout un modèle à long terme pour déformer le système de justice pénale européen dans son ensemble. Elle fait partie d'un réseau européen d'enquête qui échappe largement à un contrôle judiciaire contraignant et efficace.
{"title":"„Über den Wolken“ – Grenzenlose Freiheit?","authors":"Stefan Braum","doi":"10.5771/2193-7869-2019-2-93","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.5771/2193-7869-2019-2-93","url":null,"abstract":"La Commission européenne a présenté une proposition de règlement « relative aux injonctions européennes de production et de conservation de preuves électroniques en matière pénale ». Il est destiné à répondre aux lacunes alléguées dans l'application de la loi lors de la collecte d'éléments de preuve à partir de données stockées dans le « cloud ». La proposition représente un changement de paradigme puisque le principe de territorialité est remplacé par le principe du marché. Elle implique un changement d'orientation du droit procédural pénal européen, qui passe de la reconnaissance mutuelle et de la coopération judiciaire à l'accès unilatéral de l'exécutif aux éléments de preuve. Cela porte atteinte aux principes de protection des données. Mais au-delà de ses conséquences immédiates, la proposition est avant tout un modèle à long terme pour déformer le système de justice pénale européen dans son ensemble. Elle fait partie d'un réseau européen d'enquête qui échappe largement à un contrôle judiciaire contraignant et efficace.","PeriodicalId":275616,"journal":{"name":"Kritische Vierteljahresschrift für Gesetzgebung und Rechtswissenschaft","volume":"100 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"130002747","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
京公网安备 11010802042870号
京ICP备2023020795号-1
扫码关注我们
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：