首页 > 最新文献

Sultan Agung Notary Law Review最新文献

英文 中文
The Legal Protection for Buyer in Deed of Selling By Using A Substitute Certificate 代证买卖契据中买受人的法律保护
Pub Date : 2022-03-29 DOI: 10.30659/sanlar.4.1.36-47
Avia Surya Ningrum, Jawade Hafidz, Widayati Widayati, Peni Rinda Listyawati
This study aims to identify and analyze legal protection for land buyers whose certificates use a substitute certificate in the deed of sale and purchase, know and analyse legal certainty of the existence of a replacement certificate if it is charged with mortgage rights and knowing and analyzing examples of sale and purchase deeds using a replacement certificate. The approach method in this research was a normative juridical approach, the research specification was descriptive analytical. The data required includes primary data taken by the literature study method. The data analysis method used descriptive qualitative analysis method. Based on the research concluded that the legal protection for land buyers whose certificates use a replacement certificate in the deed of sale basically the same as legal protection for ordinary Land Rights Certificates. For parcels of land for which a certificate of replacement of land rights has been issued, the Land Office will cancel by law and withdraw and destroy the old certificates that have been previously issued so that one day it does not cause legal disputes. Legal certainty of the existence of a replacement certificate if a mortgage is charged is from: UUPA and Government Regulation Number 24 of 1997 concerning Land Registration in Article 32 paragraph (1) The second certificate (substitute) is a certificate of land rights issued by the Land Office as a substitute for the lost first certificate of the same parcel of land, in this case the subject of the rights the same and the object is also the same. So that the replacement certificate can also be used as collateral for one's debt to financial institutions, both banks and non-banks. The certificate is used as collateral from a financial institution, both bank and non-bank, then the certificate is burdened with mortgage rights, so that because of the legal guarantee of ownership of the land, someone can receive it as securities.
本研究旨在识别和分析在买卖契约中使用替代证书的土地购买者的法律保护,了解和分析替代证书存在的法律确定性,如果它被指控抵押权利,并了解和分析使用替代证书的买卖契约的例子。本研究的研究方法为规范的法学方法,研究规范为描述性分析。所需要的资料包括采用文献研究法获取的原始资料。数据分析方法采用描述性定性分析方法。根据研究得出的结论,在买卖契约中使用替代证书的土地购买者的法律保护与普通土地权证的法律保护基本相同。对于已签发土地权利置换证书的地块,土地局将依法取消并收回并销毁以前签发的旧证书,以便有一天不会引起法律纠纷。如果抵押被指控,则存在替代证书的法律确定性来自:UUPA和1997年关于土地注册的第24号政府法规第32条第(1)款。第二份证书(替代证书)是土地办公室签发的土地权利证书,作为丢失的同一块土地的第一张证书的替代品,在这种情况下,权利的主体和客体也是相同的。因此,替代凭证也可以用作个人对金融机构(包括银行和非银行机构)债务的抵押品。该证书被用作金融机构(包括银行和非银行机构)的抵押品,然后该证书承担抵押权利,因此由于土地所有权的法律保证,有人可以将其作为证券接收。
{"title":"The Legal Protection for Buyer in Deed of Selling By Using A Substitute Certificate","authors":"Avia Surya Ningrum, Jawade Hafidz, Widayati Widayati, Peni Rinda Listyawati","doi":"10.30659/sanlar.4.1.36-47","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.30659/sanlar.4.1.36-47","url":null,"abstract":"This study aims to identify and analyze legal protection for land buyers whose certificates use a substitute certificate in the deed of sale and purchase, know and analyse legal certainty of the existence of a replacement certificate if it is charged with mortgage rights and knowing and analyzing examples of sale and purchase deeds using a replacement certificate. The approach method in this research was a normative juridical approach, the research specification was descriptive analytical. The data required includes primary data taken by the literature study method. The data analysis method used descriptive qualitative analysis method. Based on the research concluded that the legal protection for land buyers whose certificates use a replacement certificate in the deed of sale basically the same as legal protection for ordinary Land Rights Certificates. For parcels of land for which a certificate of replacement of land rights has been issued, the Land Office will cancel by law and withdraw and destroy the old certificates that have been previously issued so that one day it does not cause legal disputes. Legal certainty of the existence of a replacement certificate if a mortgage is charged is from: UUPA and Government Regulation Number 24 of 1997 concerning Land Registration in Article 32 paragraph (1) The second certificate (substitute) is a certificate of land rights issued by the Land Office as a substitute for the lost first certificate of the same parcel of land, in this case the subject of the rights the same and the object is also the same. So that the replacement certificate can also be used as collateral for one's debt to financial institutions, both banks and non-banks. The certificate is used as collateral from a financial institution, both bank and non-bank, then the certificate is burdened with mortgage rights, so that because of the legal guarantee of ownership of the land, someone can receive it as securities.","PeriodicalId":279949,"journal":{"name":"Sultan Agung Notary Law Review","volume":"95 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2022-03-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"126912038","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Effectiveness of Legal Protection on Heirs in Dispute on Sale and Purchase of Inherited Land 论继承土地买卖纠纷中继承人的法律保护效力
Pub Date : 2022-03-29 DOI: 10.30659/sanlar.4.1.11-21
Muhammad Rizky Eka Pratama, Bambang Tri Bawono, Amin Purnawan, R. Sugiharto
The purpose of this study is to find out and analyze: 1) The legal consequences of a dispute over the sale and purchase of inherited land without the consent of the heirs. 2) The effectiveness of legal protection for heirs in disputes over the sale and purchase of inheritance land against the law in Surabaya. The approach method used in this study is an empirical juridical approach. The specification of the research used is descriptive analytical research. This type of data uses primary and secondary data. The data analysis method used qualitative data analysis. The results of the study concluded: 1) The legal consequences of the dispute over the sale and purchase of inheritance land without the consent of the heirs are that the land is sold by people who are not entitled to sell it (because those who now hold ownership rights to the land are the heirs), therefore the sale and purchase cancelled. As a result of the law with the cancellation of the sale and purchase, the sale and purchase is considered to have never existed, and each party is returned to its original state before the "sale and purchase" event occurred, in which the ownership rights to the land remain with the heirs. This is in accordance with Article 1471 of the Civil Code which explains that buying and selling other people's goods is void, and can provide a basis for reimbursement of costs, losses and interest, if the buyer does not already know that the goods belong to someone else. 2). The effectiveness of legal protection for heirs in disputes over the sale and purchase of inheritance land against the law in Surabaya, namely considering that there are still disputes over the sale and purchase of inherited land, the effectiveness of legal protection for heirs in Surabaya needs to be increased through socialization from the Land Agency (BPN) to the public, especially experts. heirs to register their inheritance land with BPN, as an effort to provide protection to heirs in order to avoid inheritance rights disputes which must be carried out against the law where the result of an unlawful act is loss. Efforts to protect the law on disputes over the sale and purchase of inherited land without the consent and knowledge of the heirs, the legal heirs or holders of legal property rights over the inherited land can file a lawsuit to the Court.
本研究的目的是找出和分析:1)未经继承人同意买卖继承土地纠纷的法律后果。2)在泗水,法律保护继承人在违法继承土地买卖纠纷中的有效性。本研究采用的研究方法是经验法学方法。所使用的研究规范是描述性分析研究。这种类型的数据使用主数据和辅助数据。数据分析方法采用定性数据分析。研究结果表明:1)未经继承人同意买卖继承土地纠纷的法律后果是土地被无权出售的人出售(因为现在拥有土地所有权的人是继承人),因此买卖被取消。由于法律取消了买卖,买卖被视为从未存在过,各方都回到了“买卖”事件发生前的原始状态,土地的所有权仍然属于继承人。这符合《民法典》第1471条的规定,该条款解释说,买卖他人的货物是无效的,如果买方不知道货物属于他人,则可以为赔偿成本、损失和利息提供依据。2)继承土地买卖纠纷中对继承人法律保护的有效性泗水市法律,即考虑到继承土地买卖纠纷仍然存在,泗水市法律保护继承人的有效性需要通过从土地代理机构(land Agency, BPN)到公众特别是专家的社会化来提高。继承人必须向BPN登记其继承的土地,以努力为继承人提供保护,以避免在非法行为造成损失的情况下必须违反法律进行的继承权纠纷。为了保护未经继承人同意或不知道继承土地买卖纠纷的法律,继承土地的合法继承人或合法财产权持有人可以向法院提起诉讼。
{"title":"Effectiveness of Legal Protection on Heirs in Dispute on Sale and Purchase of Inherited Land","authors":"Muhammad Rizky Eka Pratama, Bambang Tri Bawono, Amin Purnawan, R. Sugiharto","doi":"10.30659/sanlar.4.1.11-21","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.30659/sanlar.4.1.11-21","url":null,"abstract":"The purpose of this study is to find out and analyze: 1) The legal consequences of a dispute over the sale and purchase of inherited land without the consent of the heirs. 2) The effectiveness of legal protection for heirs in disputes over the sale and purchase of inheritance land against the law in Surabaya. The approach method used in this study is an empirical juridical approach. The specification of the research used is descriptive analytical research. This type of data uses primary and secondary data. The data analysis method used qualitative data analysis. The results of the study concluded: 1) The legal consequences of the dispute over the sale and purchase of inheritance land without the consent of the heirs are that the land is sold by people who are not entitled to sell it (because those who now hold ownership rights to the land are the heirs), therefore the sale and purchase cancelled. As a result of the law with the cancellation of the sale and purchase, the sale and purchase is considered to have never existed, and each party is returned to its original state before the \"sale and purchase\" event occurred, in which the ownership rights to the land remain with the heirs. This is in accordance with Article 1471 of the Civil Code which explains that buying and selling other people's goods is void, and can provide a basis for reimbursement of costs, losses and interest, if the buyer does not already know that the goods belong to someone else. 2). The effectiveness of legal protection for heirs in disputes over the sale and purchase of inheritance land against the law in Surabaya, namely considering that there are still disputes over the sale and purchase of inherited land, the effectiveness of legal protection for heirs in Surabaya needs to be increased through socialization from the Land Agency (BPN) to the public, especially experts. heirs to register their inheritance land with BPN, as an effort to provide protection to heirs in order to avoid inheritance rights disputes which must be carried out against the law where the result of an unlawful act is loss. Efforts to protect the law on disputes over the sale and purchase of inherited land without the consent and knowledge of the heirs, the legal heirs or holders of legal property rights over the inherited land can file a lawsuit to the Court.","PeriodicalId":279949,"journal":{"name":"Sultan Agung Notary Law Review","volume":"35 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2022-03-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"116517445","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1
The Legal Protection for Notary Employees who are Instrumental Witnesses in Notary Deed 公证员在公证书中作为工具证人的法律保护
Pub Date : 2022-03-26 DOI: 10.30659/sanlar.4.1.1-10
Edi Suarto, G. Gunarto, Arpangi Arpangi, Aryani Witasari
This research aims to identify and analyze legal protection for Notary employees who are instrumental witnesses in the Notary Deed, and to identify and analyze legal responsibilities for Notary employees who are instrumental witnesses in the Notary Deed which contains defects. This study used a normative juridical approach by using descriptive analytical research specifications. The type of data in this legal research was normative using primary legal materials and secondary legal materials, as well as tertiary legal materials. The data collection method in this study was in the form of literature and the data analysis method used qualitative data analysis. Based on the results of research and discussion, that the legal protection of a Notary employee who is an instrumenter witness is found in Act No. 31 of 2014 concerning Amendments to Act No. 13 of 2006 concerning the Protection of Witnesses and Victims. Then that the Notary employee who is the instrumenter witness in the Notary deed is not responsible for the deed and if there is a formal defect in the Notary Deed so that the Notary Deed is degraded its proof value as an underhand deed or if in the Notary Deed there is a material defect so that the Notary Deed can be canceled or null and void by law is not the responsibility of the Notary employee who is the instrumenter witness in the deed.
本研究旨在识别和分析公证契据中作为文书证人的公证员的法律保护,并识别和分析存在缺陷的公证契据中作为文书证人的公证人员的法律责任。本研究采用规范性的司法方法,采用描述性分析研究规范。这项法律研究的数据类型是规范性的,使用了一级法律材料和二级法律材料,以及三级法律材料。本研究的数据收集方法采用文献资料的形式,数据分析方法采用定性数据分析。根据研究和讨论的结果,作为文书证人的公证员的法律保护在2014年第31号法案中找到,该法案涉及对2006年关于保护证人和受害者的第13号法案的修正案。那公证人员工是插装器见证公证行为不负责的行为,如果有正式公证行为的缺陷,以便公证行为退化其证据价值作为公证行为不正当的行为,或者有一个材料缺陷,以便公证行为可以被取消或无效法律不是公证的责任员工插装器证人在行动。
{"title":"The Legal Protection for Notary Employees who are Instrumental Witnesses in Notary Deed","authors":"Edi Suarto, G. Gunarto, Arpangi Arpangi, Aryani Witasari","doi":"10.30659/sanlar.4.1.1-10","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.30659/sanlar.4.1.1-10","url":null,"abstract":"This research aims to identify and analyze legal protection for Notary employees who are instrumental witnesses in the Notary Deed, and to identify and analyze legal responsibilities for Notary employees who are instrumental witnesses in the Notary Deed which contains defects. This study used a normative juridical approach by using descriptive analytical research specifications. The type of data in this legal research was normative using primary legal materials and secondary legal materials, as well as tertiary legal materials. The data collection method in this study was in the form of literature and the data analysis method used qualitative data analysis. Based on the results of research and discussion, that the legal protection of a Notary employee who is an instrumenter witness is found in Act No. 31 of 2014 concerning Amendments to Act No. 13 of 2006 concerning the Protection of Witnesses and Victims. Then that the Notary employee who is the instrumenter witness in the Notary deed is not responsible for the deed and if there is a formal defect in the Notary Deed so that the Notary Deed is degraded its proof value as an underhand deed or if in the Notary Deed there is a material defect so that the Notary Deed can be canceled or null and void by law is not the responsibility of the Notary employee who is the instrumenter witness in the deed.","PeriodicalId":279949,"journal":{"name":"Sultan Agung Notary Law Review","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2022-03-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"130992280","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
The Role of a Notary in Making A Syndicated Loan Authentic Deed 公证员在制作银团贷款真确契约中的作用
Pub Date : 2021-12-21 DOI: 10.30659/sanlar.3.4.1353-1363
Jodi Purgito, Bambang Tri Bawono
The purpose of this research is to analyze & find out: 1). The role of the Notary in the implementation of the authentic deed of syndicated loan (syndicated loan) 2). Barriers & solutions in making authentic syndicated credit deeds. The approach method in this research is a sociological juridical approach. The data used are primary & secondary data obtained through interviews & literature study, data analysis was carried out by analytical descriptive. The results of the research concluded: 1). The role of the Notary in the implementation of the authentic deed of syndicated loan (syndicated loan) includes, among others, making a deed of a syndicated credit agreement requested by the bank, providing guidance to the bank regarding credit documents, making final credit documents, confirm the data to the bank if there are things that are not or are not clear, keep the name of the debtor & the amount of credit requested, & enter it into the register book to be registered with the district court. 2) Obstacles & solutions in Making Authentic Deeds for Syndicated Loans, namely: difficulties in making authentic deeds before a Notary at the same time & place, dual duties & problems with guarantee institutions. The solution that can be done to overcome these obstacles is that the Notary should add HR in his office to help the Notary's tasks, the bank must also add HR, so that there is no double duty. To deal with problems related to guarantee institutions, the Paripassu Security Sharing Agreement (Security Sharing Agreement) emerged.
本研究的目的是分析和找出:1)公证员在银团贷款(银团贷款)真实契据执行中的作用2)制作真实的银团信用契据的障碍及解决方法。本研究的研究方法是社会学的法学方法。使用的数据是通过访谈和文献研究获得的一手和二手数据,数据分析采用分析描述性。研究结果如下:1).公证员在执行真实的银团贷款契据(银团贷款)中的作用包括:制作银行要求的银团信贷协议契据,对银行提供有关信贷文件的指导,制作最终的信贷文件,如有遗漏或不清楚的,向银行确认数据,保留债务人的姓名和要求的信贷金额;并将其记入待向区域法院登记的登记册内。2)银团贷款制作真实契据的障碍及解决方法,即:在同一时间、同一地点公证制作真实契据的困难、双重责任、与担保机构的问题。克服这些障碍的解决方案是,公证人应该在他的办公室增加HR来帮助公证人的任务,银行也必须增加HR,这样就不会有双重责任。为了解决与担保机构相关的问题,帕里帕苏证券共享协议(Security Sharing Agreement)应运而生。
{"title":"The Role of a Notary in Making A Syndicated Loan Authentic Deed","authors":"Jodi Purgito, Bambang Tri Bawono","doi":"10.30659/sanlar.3.4.1353-1363","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.30659/sanlar.3.4.1353-1363","url":null,"abstract":"The purpose of this research is to analyze & find out: 1). The role of the Notary in the implementation of the authentic deed of syndicated loan (syndicated loan) 2). Barriers & solutions in making authentic syndicated credit deeds. The approach method in this research is a sociological juridical approach. The data used are primary & secondary data obtained through interviews & literature study, data analysis was carried out by analytical descriptive. The results of the research concluded: 1). The role of the Notary in the implementation of the authentic deed of syndicated loan (syndicated loan) includes, among others, making a deed of a syndicated credit agreement requested by the bank, providing guidance to the bank regarding credit documents, making final credit documents, confirm the data to the bank if there are things that are not or are not clear, keep the name of the debtor & the amount of credit requested, & enter it into the register book to be registered with the district court. 2) Obstacles & solutions in Making Authentic Deeds for Syndicated Loans, namely: difficulties in making authentic deeds before a Notary at the same time & place, dual duties & problems with guarantee institutions. The solution that can be done to overcome these obstacles is that the Notary should add HR in his office to help the Notary's tasks, the bank must also add HR, so that there is no double duty. To deal with problems related to guarantee institutions, the Paripassu Security Sharing Agreement (Security Sharing Agreement) emerged.","PeriodicalId":279949,"journal":{"name":"Sultan Agung Notary Law Review","volume":"339 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2021-12-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"116445834","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Legal Protection for Buyers against the Understanding of Home Ownership Loans 法律保护购房者对自置居所贷款的理解
Pub Date : 2021-12-21 DOI: 10.30659/sanlar.3.4.1331-1341
Evie Pravitasari, Aryani Witasari
Subsidized Home Ownership Loans are loans intended for lower-middle income communities in order to meet housing needs or repair houses that they already own. KPR is a credit facility provided by the Bank as a creditor to consumers (buyers) as debtors which are used to purchase land and houses on it. The approach used in this study is a normative juridical approach. The results of this study are: 1) Legal protection for buyers in cases of buying and selling houses and land under the hands can be obtained by submitting an application for determination to the local district court to ratify the buying and selling process, 2) The validity of buying and selling which aims to take over ownership credit house under the hand is not binding on third parties. In connection with this, according to law the legal owner of the land and building is the owner of the first party so that the transfer of rights must go through/obtain the approval of the first party. This makes it difficult in the future, especially if the owner's whereabouts are known.
补贴住房自有贷款是为中低收入社区提供的贷款,目的是满足他们的住房需求或修复他们已经拥有的房屋。KPR是银行作为债权人向作为债务人的消费者(买家)提供的一种信贷便利,用于购买土地和房屋。本研究使用的方法是一种规范的司法方法。本研究的结果是:1)买方在买卖挂牌房屋和土地的案件中,可以通过向当地的地方法院提交认定申请,获得对买卖过程的法律保护;2)以接管所有权信用挂牌房屋为目的的买卖,其效力对第三人不具有约束力。因此,根据法律规定,土地和建筑物的合法所有人是甲方的所有人,因此权利的转让必须经过甲方的批准。这使得在未来很难找到,特别是如果主人的下落是已知的。
{"title":"Legal Protection for Buyers against the Understanding of Home Ownership Loans","authors":"Evie Pravitasari, Aryani Witasari","doi":"10.30659/sanlar.3.4.1331-1341","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.30659/sanlar.3.4.1331-1341","url":null,"abstract":"Subsidized Home Ownership Loans are loans intended for lower-middle income communities in order to meet housing needs or repair houses that they already own. KPR is a credit facility provided by the Bank as a creditor to consumers (buyers) as debtors which are used to purchase land and houses on it. The approach used in this study is a normative juridical approach. The results of this study are: 1) Legal protection for buyers in cases of buying and selling houses and land under the hands can be obtained by submitting an application for determination to the local district court to ratify the buying and selling process, 2) The validity of buying and selling which aims to take over ownership credit house under the hand is not binding on third parties. In connection with this, according to law the legal owner of the land and building is the owner of the first party so that the transfer of rights must go through/obtain the approval of the first party. This makes it difficult in the future, especially if the owner's whereabouts are known.","PeriodicalId":279949,"journal":{"name":"Sultan Agung Notary Law Review","volume":"38 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2021-12-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"122802041","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1
Notary Role in Making of a Marriage Agreement for A Husband & Wife Couple in Divorce 公证在离婚夫妻签订婚姻协议中的作用
Pub Date : 2021-12-21 DOI: 10.30659/sanlar.3.4.1342-1352
Akrimni Nur Zakiyyah, S. Wahyuningsih
The existence of the institution of marriage is to legalize the legal relationship between a man and a woman. Due to the very important consequences of marriage, society needs a regulation of living together, namely regarding the conditions for the inauguration, implementation, continuation and termination of living together. However, it is unfortunate that many people in their domestic life end up in divorce. This is what people often use as the only way to end domestic conflicts, so that it has a negative impact on children or one of the divorced couples.Based on this description, this study aims to find out and analyze how the role of a notary in making a marriage agreement deed for a husband and wife in divorce and analyze how the function of a marriage agreement in a husband and wife in divorce. The research method in this thesis uses a sociological juridical approach with descriptive research specifications. Data sources and data collection methods used primary and secondary data which were analyzed qualitatively. The results of this study indicate that the authority of a notary in carrying out his duties and position as a notary is to make an authentic deed. The function of the marriage agreement deed in divorce is to respect and appreciate the dignity of each party and to ensure that there are limits to the rights and obligations that must be carried out by husband and wife, but in marriage there are provisions for the distribution of assets if a problem occurs in the future. if the parties wish that the joint property be included in the joint decision with a divorce dispute, the results to be obtained are for peace and the examination does not require many stages of examination as the examination of marital property in general which is not related or bound by a marriage agreement.
婚姻制度的存在是为了使男女之间的法律关系合法化。由于婚姻的重要后果,社会需要一个共同生活的规范,即关于共同生活的开始、实施、延续和终止的条件。然而,不幸的是,许多人在家庭生活中以离婚告终。这是人们经常使用的唯一方法来结束家庭冲突,因此它对孩子或离婚夫妇中的一方有负面影响。在此基础上,本研究旨在找出并分析公证员在离婚夫妻的婚姻协议契据制作中的作用,以及婚姻协议在离婚夫妻中的作用。本文的研究方法采用社会学和法学的研究方法,并辅以描述性的研究规范。数据来源和数据收集方法采用了定性分析的一手和二手数据。本研究结果表明,公证员在履行其职责和地位时的权威是做出真实的契据。在离婚中,婚姻协议的作用是尊重和欣赏双方的尊严,并确保夫妻双方必须履行的权利和义务是有限度的,但在婚姻中,如果将来出现问题,则有财产分配的规定。离婚纠纷中,当事人希望将共同财产纳入共同判决的,其结果是和平的,审查不需要像审查一般与婚姻协议无关或不受婚姻协议约束的婚姻财产那样经过许多阶段的审查。
{"title":"Notary Role in Making of a Marriage Agreement for A Husband & Wife Couple in Divorce","authors":"Akrimni Nur Zakiyyah, S. Wahyuningsih","doi":"10.30659/sanlar.3.4.1342-1352","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.30659/sanlar.3.4.1342-1352","url":null,"abstract":"The existence of the institution of marriage is to legalize the legal relationship between a man and a woman. Due to the very important consequences of marriage, society needs a regulation of living together, namely regarding the conditions for the inauguration, implementation, continuation and termination of living together. However, it is unfortunate that many people in their domestic life end up in divorce. This is what people often use as the only way to end domestic conflicts, so that it has a negative impact on children or one of the divorced couples.Based on this description, this study aims to find out and analyze how the role of a notary in making a marriage agreement deed for a husband and wife in divorce and analyze how the function of a marriage agreement in a husband and wife in divorce. The research method in this thesis uses a sociological juridical approach with descriptive research specifications. Data sources and data collection methods used primary and secondary data which were analyzed qualitatively. The results of this study indicate that the authority of a notary in carrying out his duties and position as a notary is to make an authentic deed. The function of the marriage agreement deed in divorce is to respect and appreciate the dignity of each party and to ensure that there are limits to the rights and obligations that must be carried out by husband and wife, but in marriage there are provisions for the distribution of assets if a problem occurs in the future. if the parties wish that the joint property be included in the joint decision with a divorce dispute, the results to be obtained are for peace and the examination does not require many stages of examination as the examination of marital property in general which is not related or bound by a marriage agreement.","PeriodicalId":279949,"journal":{"name":"Sultan Agung Notary Law Review","volume":"26 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2021-12-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"124086381","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Implementation Effectiveness of Electronic Liability Registration 电子责任登记的实施效果
Pub Date : 2021-12-21 DOI: 10.30659/sanlar.3.4.1364-1374
Endah Subekti Tri Astuti, Widayati Widayati
The purpose of this study is to determine and analyze: 1) the effectiveness of the current electronic mortgage registration implementation. 2) Factors that affect the effectiveness of the current implementation of electronic mortgage registration. The approach method used in discussing this research problem is a normative juridical approach.The research specification used is descriptive analytical research. This type of data uses secondary data. The data analysis method used in this research is qualitative data analysis. The results of the study concluded: 1) The implementation of HT registration with the HT-el System at the Land Office has not all been carried out in accordance with the procedures stated in the Technical Guidelines for HT-el. Procedural discrepancies, for example, were found in files that were suspended and closed in 2019 until May 12, 2020. Application files that did not comply with the procedures were discovered based on the results of the Land Office inspection, if not checked, the HT-el certificate would be issued automatically on the seventh day. Issuance without any inspection from the Land Office if there is a procedural error, it is feared that it will become a problem in the future. Obstacles in HT registration with the HT-el System occur in PPAT, Banks as creditors and the Land Office. These obstacles arise during the HT registration process, both technically and non-technically. 2). Barriers related to technical aspects include the lack of facilities such as ranking selection, selecting more than one certificate and providing facilities for checking certificate data in HT-el applications. Meanwhile, in non-technical barriers, there are regulations in Permen ATR/BPN No. 5 of 2020 which is not in accordance with UUHT as the legal basis for the Ministerial Regulation issued, where in UUHT the second sheet of APHT and other warrants are submitted to the Land Office in physical form but in Permen ATR/BPN No. 5 of 2020 only in digital form of scan results.
本研究的目的是确定和分析:1)当前电子抵押登记实施的有效性。2)影响当前实施电子抵押登记有效性的因素。在讨论这一研究问题时所采用的方法是一种规范的法律方法。使用的研究规范是描述性分析研究。这种类型的数据使用辅助数据。本研究使用的数据分析方法是定性数据分析。研究的结论是:1)地政总署利用土地注册处的土地注册处系统进行土地注册处注册的工作,并非全都按照土地注册处技术指引所载的程序进行。例如,在2019年暂停并关闭至2020年5月12日的文件中发现了程序上的差异。根据土地局的检查结果,发现了不符合程序的申请文件,如果不检查,将在第7天自动颁发HT-el证书。如果在没有经过国土厅的检查的情况下发放,如果出现程序上的错误,恐怕以后会成为问题。在HT-el制度下进行HT登记的障碍出现在PPAT、作为债权人的银行和土地局。这些障碍出现在高温登记过程中,既有技术性的,也有非技术性的。2)技术方面的障碍包括在HT-el应用程序中缺乏诸如排序选择、选择多个证书和提供检查证书数据的设施等设施。同时,在非技术壁垒方面,2020年Permen ATR/BPN No 5中有一些规定与uht不一致,作为发布的部长法规的法律依据,其中uht中APHT的第二页和其他权证以实物形式提交给土地办公室,而2020年Permen ATR/BPN No 5中仅以扫描结果的数字形式提交。
{"title":"Implementation Effectiveness of Electronic Liability Registration","authors":"Endah Subekti Tri Astuti, Widayati Widayati","doi":"10.30659/sanlar.3.4.1364-1374","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.30659/sanlar.3.4.1364-1374","url":null,"abstract":"The purpose of this study is to determine and analyze: 1) the effectiveness of the current electronic mortgage registration implementation. 2) Factors that affect the effectiveness of the current implementation of electronic mortgage registration. The approach method used in discussing this research problem is a normative juridical approach.The research specification used is descriptive analytical research. This type of data uses secondary data. The data analysis method used in this research is qualitative data analysis. The results of the study concluded: 1) The implementation of HT registration with the HT-el System at the Land Office has not all been carried out in accordance with the procedures stated in the Technical Guidelines for HT-el. Procedural discrepancies, for example, were found in files that were suspended and closed in 2019 until May 12, 2020. Application files that did not comply with the procedures were discovered based on the results of the Land Office inspection, if not checked, the HT-el certificate would be issued automatically on the seventh day. Issuance without any inspection from the Land Office if there is a procedural error, it is feared that it will become a problem in the future. Obstacles in HT registration with the HT-el System occur in PPAT, Banks as creditors and the Land Office. These obstacles arise during the HT registration process, both technically and non-technically. 2). Barriers related to technical aspects include the lack of facilities such as ranking selection, selecting more than one certificate and providing facilities for checking certificate data in HT-el applications. Meanwhile, in non-technical barriers, there are regulations in Permen ATR/BPN No. 5 of 2020 which is not in accordance with UUHT as the legal basis for the Ministerial Regulation issued, where in UUHT the second sheet of APHT and other warrants are submitted to the Land Office in physical form but in Permen ATR/BPN No. 5 of 2020 only in digital form of scan results.","PeriodicalId":279949,"journal":{"name":"Sultan Agung Notary Law Review","volume":"217 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2021-12-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"122839489","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Legal Consequences of Financing a PT Established by Husband and Wife Without a Marriage Agreement on the Signing of a Lease Agreement 夫妻在没有结婚协议的情况下出资兴建私人住宅的法律后果——签订租赁协议
Pub Date : 2021-12-17 DOI: 10.30659/sanlar.3.4.1286-1298
M. Madaninabawi, Jawade Hafidz
The purpose of this study is to analyze: 1). Regulation of the establishment of a limited liability company by a married couple without a marriage agreement on the signing of a lease agreement in a finance company. 2). The legal consequences of a Limited Liability Company established by a married couple without a marriage agreement are the signing of a lease agreement at a finance company. The research method used in this research is normative juridical research. The data in this study uses secondary data, which is sourced from library materials, while the data analysis uses qualitative analysis. The conclusions in this study are: 1) The regulation of the establishment of a Limited Liability Company by a married couple without a marriage agreement on the signing of a lease agreement in a finance company, namely basically there is no clear statutory regulation regarding the establishment of a Limited Liability Company (PT) by a married couple without a marriage agreement, In practice, it is possible for a Notary to continue serving on the grounds that a PT is an agreement between two or more people and husband and wife as legal subjects have rights and obligations under the law. Even in the establishment of a PT, the Indonesian Ministry of Law and Human Rights - SABH never questioned husband and wife or not, the legal entity of the PT was still ratified. Generally, the lease agreement made is in the standard form made by the lessor, while the lessee only agrees to it. The agreement made is binding on the parties who make it. 2) The legal consequences of a Limited Liability Company established by a married couple without a marriage agreement on the signing of a lease agreement at a finance company, namely the agreement is valid if it fulfills the conditions in the agreement, but in the event of bankruptcy or default in the lease agreement, the liability for the debt or losses to the finance company are not only borne by the assets available in the PT, if the assets in the PT are not sufficient to pay the debts, then husband and wife as well as founders and shareholders will share in the use of the joint assets.
本研究的目的是分析:1)没有结婚协议的已婚夫妇在金融公司签订租赁协议设立有限责任公司的规制。没有结婚协议的已婚夫妇成立有限责任公司的法律后果是在财务公司签订租赁协议。本研究采用的研究方法是规范法学研究。本研究的数据采用二手数据,来源于图书馆资料,数据分析采用定性分析。本研究的结论是:1)对已婚夫妇无结婚协议设立有限责任公司在金融公司签订租赁协议的规定,即对已婚夫妇无结婚协议设立有限责任公司基本没有明确的法律规定,在实践中,公证人有可能继续服务,理由是遗嘱是两个或两个以上的人之间的协议,夫妻作为法律主体在法律下享有权利和义务。即使在建立劳工党时,印尼法律和人权部(SABH)从未质疑过夫妻关系,劳工党的法律实体仍然得到批准。一般来说,租赁协议是出租人订立的标准形式,承租人只是同意。所达成的协议对签订协议的各方都有约束力。2)有限责任公司设立的法律后果没有婚姻的夫妻协议签署的租赁协议在金融公司,即协议是有效的,如果它满足条件的协议,但在破产或违约的事件在租赁协议,债务责任或损失的金融公司不仅承担资产可用PT,如果PT的资产不足以支付债务,然后夫妻以及创始人和股东将分享共同资产的使用。
{"title":"Legal Consequences of Financing a PT Established by Husband and Wife Without a Marriage Agreement on the Signing of a Lease Agreement","authors":"M. Madaninabawi, Jawade Hafidz","doi":"10.30659/sanlar.3.4.1286-1298","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.30659/sanlar.3.4.1286-1298","url":null,"abstract":"The purpose of this study is to analyze: 1). Regulation of the establishment of a limited liability company by a married couple without a marriage agreement on the signing of a lease agreement in a finance company. 2). The legal consequences of a Limited Liability Company established by a married couple without a marriage agreement are the signing of a lease agreement at a finance company. The research method used in this research is normative juridical research. The data in this study uses secondary data, which is sourced from library materials, while the data analysis uses qualitative analysis. The conclusions in this study are: 1) The regulation of the establishment of a Limited Liability Company by a married couple without a marriage agreement on the signing of a lease agreement in a finance company, namely basically there is no clear statutory regulation regarding the establishment of a Limited Liability Company (PT) by a married couple without a marriage agreement, In practice, it is possible for a Notary to continue serving on the grounds that a PT is an agreement between two or more people and husband and wife as legal subjects have rights and obligations under the law. Even in the establishment of a PT, the Indonesian Ministry of Law and Human Rights - SABH never questioned husband and wife or not, the legal entity of the PT was still ratified. Generally, the lease agreement made is in the standard form made by the lessor, while the lessee only agrees to it. The agreement made is binding on the parties who make it. 2) The legal consequences of a Limited Liability Company established by a married couple without a marriage agreement on the signing of a lease agreement at a finance company, namely the agreement is valid if it fulfills the conditions in the agreement, but in the event of bankruptcy or default in the lease agreement, the liability for the debt or losses to the finance company are not only borne by the assets available in the PT, if the assets in the PT are not sufficient to pay the debts, then husband and wife as well as founders and shareholders will share in the use of the joint assets.","PeriodicalId":279949,"journal":{"name":"Sultan Agung Notary Law Review","volume":"74 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2021-12-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"124604177","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1
Implementation of Legal Norms & Notaries Responsibility in the Making of a Deed of Grants 法律规范的实施与赠与契约的公证责任
Pub Date : 2021-12-17 DOI: 10.30659/sanlar.3.4.1299-1307
Nanda Herawati, Aryani Witasari
The making of the grant deed must be carried out in the presence of an official authorized to make the deed, this is in accordance with the provisions contained in article 1682 of the Civil Code. In the case of land grants, the deed of grant is made before or by the Land Deed Making Official (PPAT). In making the grant deed, the Notary has an important role. The notary also keeps the deed of grant that has been made. The approach method used is normative juridical. The result of this research is that the authority of the Notary in making the Deed of Grant Agreement based on the Civil Code is in Article 1666 of the Civil Code which confirms that grants can be made and Articles 1671, 1672, 1687 of the Civil Code. The implementation of the land grant agreement made by a Notary on the basis of his authority must refer to the Civil Code in formulating the clauses in the Deed of Grant Agreement. Notaries are required to keep the contents of the deed and information obtained in the exercise of my position as stated in Article 4 paragraph (2) of the UUJN, it is also explained in Article 1909 paragraph (3) of the Civil Code that anyone who because of his position, work or position according to the law, must to keep something secret.
根据《民法典》第1682条的规定,授予契约的订立必须在获授权的官员在场的情况下进行。就批地而言,批地契约是在土地契约签发官员之前或由该官员签发的。公证人在订立赠与契约时扮演重要角色。公证人也保留已作出的授予契约。所使用的方法是规范的司法方法。本研究的结果是,公证员在根据民法典制定赠与契约时的权威是《民法典》第1666条和《民法典》第1671、1672、1687条。公证员根据其权力订立的土地批赠协议的执行,在制定批赠协议契据的条款时,必须参考民法典。公证员必须保守在行使我的职位时所获得的契约内容和信息,这是联合国宪章第4条第(2)款所规定的,民法典第1909条第(3)款也解释了任何人由于他的职位,工作或职位依法必须保守秘密。
{"title":"Implementation of Legal Norms & Notaries Responsibility in the Making of a Deed of Grants","authors":"Nanda Herawati, Aryani Witasari","doi":"10.30659/sanlar.3.4.1299-1307","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.30659/sanlar.3.4.1299-1307","url":null,"abstract":"The making of the grant deed must be carried out in the presence of an official authorized to make the deed, this is in accordance with the provisions contained in article 1682 of the Civil Code. In the case of land grants, the deed of grant is made before or by the Land Deed Making Official (PPAT). In making the grant deed, the Notary has an important role. The notary also keeps the deed of grant that has been made. The approach method used is normative juridical. The result of this research is that the authority of the Notary in making the Deed of Grant Agreement based on the Civil Code is in Article 1666 of the Civil Code which confirms that grants can be made and Articles 1671, 1672, 1687 of the Civil Code. The implementation of the land grant agreement made by a Notary on the basis of his authority must refer to the Civil Code in formulating the clauses in the Deed of Grant Agreement. Notaries are required to keep the contents of the deed and information obtained in the exercise of my position as stated in Article 4 paragraph (2) of the UUJN, it is also explained in Article 1909 paragraph (3) of the Civil Code that anyone who because of his position, work or position according to the law, must to keep something secret.","PeriodicalId":279949,"journal":{"name":"Sultan Agung Notary Law Review","volume":"52 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2021-12-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"130254465","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Determination of Minimum Rates for Notary Honorarium to Avoid Tariff War between Notaries 确定公证员酬金的最低收费标准,避免公证员之间的“价格战”
Pub Date : 2021-12-17 DOI: 10.30659/sanlar.3.4.1308-1319
Widya Ishwara Danardana, M. Maryanto
The notary position is an institution created by the state. Notary as a position is a field of work created by legal rules for certain functions and is sustainable as a work environment. The existence of a notary as a state official who is authorized to make a legal product, namely an authentic deed, does not receive an honorarium from the state, therefore a notary is entitled to receive an honorarium for the legal services provided. Notaries receive an honorarium from the public for services in making an authentic deed. The honorarium is given to those who carry out their duties based on the laws and regulations, while the success fee is given to those who carry out the profession. Based on this description, This study aims to find out and analyze the basic regulatory considerations related to the amount of the Notary's honorarium in the Notary Position Act and the Notary Code of Ethics, analyze the formulation of the minimum amount of Notary honorarium arrangement, and find out the sanctions for notaries who violate the rules on the minimum rate of Notary honorarium. The research method in this thesis uses a sociological juridical approach with descriptive research specifications. Data sources and data collection methods used primary and secondary data which were analyzed qualitatively. The results of the study indicate that the basis for consideration of setting the minimum amount of notary honorarium in the Law on Notary Positions has not been determined regarding the minimum amount. Basically, the Law on Notary Positions only provides a maximum limit on the honorarium that can be withdrawn from transactions. Notaries have the right to determine their own values based on their considerations as long as they do not exceed the maximum provisions of the Law on Notary Positions. It is necessary to amend Article 36 of the Law on Notary Positions in order to mention the determination of the minimum honorarium limit determined by the notary position organization, so that the determination of the notary position professional organization has binding power based on the Notary Position Act.
公证员是国家创设的一种制度。公证员作为一个职位是由法律规则为某些功能创建的工作领域,并且作为一个工作环境是可持续的。公证员作为国家官员的存在,被授权制作法律产品,即真实的契约,不从国家获得酬金,因此公证员有权获得提供法律服务的酬金。公证人从公众那里收取酬金,以提供真实的契约服务。酬金是给那些依法依规履行职责的人,而成功费是给那些执行职业的人。在此基础上,本研究旨在找出并分析《公证员职务法》和《公证员职业道德规范》中有关公证员酬金金额的基本监管考虑,分析公证员酬金最低金额安排的制定,以及对违反公证员酬金最低费率规定的公证员的处罚。本文的研究方法采用社会学和法学的研究方法,并辅以描述性的研究规范。数据来源和数据收集方法采用了定性分析的一手和二手数据。研究结果表明,考虑在《公证法》中规定最低公证酬金数额的依据尚未确定。基本上,《公证法》只规定了可以从交易中提取酬金的最高限额。公证员在不超过《公证法》最高规定的范围内,有权根据自己的考虑确定自己的价值。有必要修改《公证职位法》第三十六条,以提及由公证职位机构确定的最低酬金限额的确定,使公证职位专业机构的确定具有以《公证职位法》为依据的约束力。
{"title":"Determination of Minimum Rates for Notary Honorarium to Avoid Tariff War between Notaries","authors":"Widya Ishwara Danardana, M. Maryanto","doi":"10.30659/sanlar.3.4.1308-1319","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.30659/sanlar.3.4.1308-1319","url":null,"abstract":"The notary position is an institution created by the state. Notary as a position is a field of work created by legal rules for certain functions and is sustainable as a work environment. The existence of a notary as a state official who is authorized to make a legal product, namely an authentic deed, does not receive an honorarium from the state, therefore a notary is entitled to receive an honorarium for the legal services provided. Notaries receive an honorarium from the public for services in making an authentic deed. The honorarium is given to those who carry out their duties based on the laws and regulations, while the success fee is given to those who carry out the profession. Based on this description, This study aims to find out and analyze the basic regulatory considerations related to the amount of the Notary's honorarium in the Notary Position Act and the Notary Code of Ethics, analyze the formulation of the minimum amount of Notary honorarium arrangement, and find out the sanctions for notaries who violate the rules on the minimum rate of Notary honorarium. The research method in this thesis uses a sociological juridical approach with descriptive research specifications. Data sources and data collection methods used primary and secondary data which were analyzed qualitatively. The results of the study indicate that the basis for consideration of setting the minimum amount of notary honorarium in the Law on Notary Positions has not been determined regarding the minimum amount. Basically, the Law on Notary Positions only provides a maximum limit on the honorarium that can be withdrawn from transactions. Notaries have the right to determine their own values based on their considerations as long as they do not exceed the maximum provisions of the Law on Notary Positions. It is necessary to amend Article 36 of the Law on Notary Positions in order to mention the determination of the minimum honorarium limit determined by the notary position organization, so that the determination of the notary position professional organization has binding power based on the Notary Position Act.","PeriodicalId":279949,"journal":{"name":"Sultan Agung Notary Law Review","volume":"115 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2021-12-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"124036817","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
期刊
Sultan Agung Notary Law Review
全部 Acc. Chem. Res. ACS Applied Bio Materials ACS Appl. Electron. Mater. ACS Appl. Energy Mater. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces ACS Appl. Nano Mater. ACS Appl. Polym. Mater. ACS BIOMATER-SCI ENG ACS Catal. ACS Cent. Sci. ACS Chem. Biol. ACS Chemical Health & Safety ACS Chem. Neurosci. ACS Comb. Sci. ACS Earth Space Chem. ACS Energy Lett. ACS Infect. Dis. ACS Macro Lett. ACS Mater. Lett. ACS Med. Chem. Lett. ACS Nano ACS Omega ACS Photonics ACS Sens. ACS Sustainable Chem. Eng. ACS Synth. Biol. Anal. Chem. BIOCHEMISTRY-US Bioconjugate Chem. BIOMACROMOLECULES Chem. Res. Toxicol. Chem. Rev. Chem. Mater. CRYST GROWTH DES ENERG FUEL Environ. Sci. Technol. Environ. Sci. Technol. Lett. Eur. J. Inorg. Chem. IND ENG CHEM RES Inorg. Chem. J. Agric. Food. Chem. J. Chem. Eng. Data J. Chem. Educ. J. Chem. Inf. Model. J. Chem. Theory Comput. J. Med. Chem. J. Nat. Prod. J PROTEOME RES J. Am. Chem. Soc. LANGMUIR MACROMOLECULES Mol. Pharmaceutics Nano Lett. Org. Lett. ORG PROCESS RES DEV ORGANOMETALLICS J. Org. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. A J. Phys. Chem. B J. Phys. Chem. C J. Phys. Chem. Lett. Analyst Anal. Methods Biomater. Sci. Catal. Sci. Technol. Chem. Commun. Chem. Soc. Rev. CHEM EDUC RES PRACT CRYSTENGCOMM Dalton Trans. Energy Environ. Sci. ENVIRON SCI-NANO ENVIRON SCI-PROC IMP ENVIRON SCI-WAT RES Faraday Discuss. Food Funct. Green Chem. Inorg. Chem. Front. Integr. Biol. J. Anal. At. Spectrom. J. Mater. Chem. A J. Mater. Chem. B J. Mater. Chem. C Lab Chip Mater. Chem. Front. Mater. Horiz. MEDCHEMCOMM Metallomics Mol. Biosyst. Mol. Syst. Des. Eng. Nanoscale Nanoscale Horiz. Nat. Prod. Rep. New J. Chem. Org. Biomol. Chem. Org. Chem. Front. PHOTOCH PHOTOBIO SCI PCCP Polym. Chem.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1