首页 > 最新文献

Materiały i Sprawozdania Rzeszowskiego Ośrodka Archeologicznego最新文献

英文 中文
O ewaluacji czasopism naukowych uwag kilka, czyli dlaczego „Materiały i Sprawozdania Rzeszowskiego Ośrodka Archeologicznego” będą nadal wydawane
Pub Date : 1900-01-01 DOI: 10.15584/misroa.2019.40.12
Sylwester Czopek
{"title":"O ewaluacji czasopism naukowych uwag kilka, czyli dlaczego „Materiały i Sprawozdania Rzeszowskiego Ośrodka Archeologicznego” będą nadal wydawane","authors":"Sylwester Czopek","doi":"10.15584/misroa.2019.40.12","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.15584/misroa.2019.40.12","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":281758,"journal":{"name":"Materiały i Sprawozdania Rzeszowskiego Ośrodka Archeologicznego","volume":"2 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"122091555","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Поселення пізнього етапу трипільської культури Кунисівці і Перебиківці у Подністер’ї
Pub Date : 1900-01-01 DOI: 10.15584/misroa.2021.42.1
Олександр Позіховський, Андрій Гавінський
The late stage of the Tripolye culture, which has recently attracted the interest of various researchers, is particularly worth mentioning. Currently available sources provide the basis for several important conclusions regarding this period. First of all, this culture is characterized by the similarity all over the area of its range in the sets of vessels and their style, in flint and bone items, as well as in construction. Only its northwest region is distinguished. There are: models of houses and anthropomorphic objects in the Badenian type, as well as vessels and battle axe models in the type of the Funnel Beaker culture. Secondly, two chronological horizons of the late Tripolye culture can be distinguished; early – 3350/3300 ВС and late – 3100/3000/2900 ВС. This division is related to the frequency of using cord decorations; in the early stage they were used relatively rarely, whereas later they were more common. Thirdly, at the turn of 4th–3rd thousand BC, apart from the Tripolye culture, among others, there were communities of the Globular Amphora culture in Volhynia. However, in the areas of the Dniester right-bank, groups of the Corded Ware culture might have appeared, whose contacts with the Tripolye culture are currently unknown.
最近吸引了各种研究人员兴趣的Tripolye文化的晚期特别值得一提。目前可获得的资料为关于这一时期的若干重要结论提供了依据。首先,这种文化的特点是在其范围内的所有容器及其样式,燧石和骨头物品以及建筑上都具有相似性。只有西北地区是有区别的。有:巴登尼亚类型的房屋和拟人化物体模型,以及漏斗烧杯文化类型的船只和战斧模型。其次,可以区分出晚期特里波利文化的两个时间视界;前期- 3350/3300 ВС,后期- 3100/3000/2900 ВС。这种划分与使用绳饰的频率有关;在早期阶段,它们的使用相对较少,而后来它们更常见。第三,在公元前4 - 3千年之交,除了Tripolye文化外,在Volhynia还有Globular Amphora文化社区。然而,在德涅斯特右岸地区,可能出现了绳纹器文化群体,他们与特里波利文化的接触目前尚不清楚。
{"title":"Поселення пізнього етапу трипільської культури Кунисівці і Перебиківці у Подністер’ї","authors":"Олександр Позіховський, Андрій Гавінський","doi":"10.15584/misroa.2021.42.1","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.15584/misroa.2021.42.1","url":null,"abstract":"The late stage of the Tripolye culture, which has recently attracted the interest of various researchers, is particularly worth mentioning. Currently available sources provide the basis for several important conclusions regarding this period. First of all, this culture is characterized by the similarity all over the area of its range in the sets of vessels and their style, in flint and bone items, as well as in construction. Only its northwest region is distinguished. There are: models of houses and anthropomorphic objects in the Badenian type, as well as vessels and battle axe models in the type of the Funnel Beaker culture. Secondly, two chronological horizons of the late Tripolye culture can be distinguished; early – 3350/3300 ВС and late – 3100/3000/2900 ВС. This division is related to the frequency of using cord decorations; in the early stage they were used relatively rarely, whereas later they were more common. Thirdly, at the turn of 4th–3rd thousand BC, apart from the Tripolye culture, among others, there were communities of the Globular Amphora culture in Volhynia. However, in the areas of the Dniester right-bank, groups of the Corded Ware culture might have appeared, whose contacts with the Tripolye culture are currently unknown.","PeriodicalId":281758,"journal":{"name":"Materiały i Sprawozdania Rzeszowskiego Ośrodka Archeologicznego","volume":"14 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"129903228","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Nieinwazyjne i małoinwazyjne badania archeologiczne grodziska w Horbowie-Kolonii, w powiecie bialskim, w województwie lubelskim, w roku 2021
Pub Date : 1900-01-01 DOI: 10.15584/misroa.2021.42.7
Piotrowski Marcin, P. Piotrowska, E. Kłosińska
Archaeological research in Horbowo-Kolonia, Zalesie commune, Biała Podlaska district, in November 2021 was ordered by the Lublin Provincial Conservation Officer. The aim of the study was to identify better the fortified settlement included in the record of archaeological sites under the number AZP 60-88/88, site nr 10 and to put it under preservation order by entering it in the register of monuments of the Lubelskie Voivodeship. Due to the limited time and season of the year, it was decided to use minimally invasive and non-invasive methods of research - modern technologies, geophysics and remote sensing. Researchers prepared a series of several dozen geological probing, geophysical prospection with the magnetic method within the fortified settlement and the „podgrodzie”, aerial photographs from the drone, as well as the generation of maps, plans and 3D models based on field measurements and LiDAR data, analysis of orthophotomaps from various periods, provided by The Head Office of Geodesy and Cartography in Warsaw (GUGiK). The research was preceded by an archival research. The site is located in the south-western part of Zalesie commune, in the central part of Biała Podlaska district, about 15 km east of Biała Podlaska. It is located at the end of a sandy deposits formed as a result of river accumulation, shaped by the waters of the Krzna River, which meandered strongly in the distant past. The local name Horbow has a topographic character and is associated with the oronyms of the type Horbek or Horby, derived from the Ukrainian word горб (horb) or the Ruthenian горб (gorb) meaning hump, a slight hill. The etymological basis of the local name Horbow upon Krzna was certainly created before the appearance of the Horbowski (Zaranek-Horbowski) family in this area, which took place at the beginning of the 15th century. Giving the Zaranek family a manor in Horbow resulted in the creation of the nickname Horbowscy, which became a commonly used surname with time. On the basis of geological probing, it was possible to distinguish 15 different types of layers at the site. Even though, the diagnosed stratigraphy gives a very general picture, it allows the researchers to plan future excavations. As it was indicated by means of trial excavations, the relics of the ramparts and moats had preserved some elements of the original construction. During the magnetic prospection, many anomalies were captured that can be considered archaeological features and traces of human activity in the Modern period. A special place in this group is encompassed by the M-1 type feature, which should be interpreted as an image of the box structure of the main (internal) rampart of the fortified settlement. What is more, the entrance gate was also located. The stronghold in Horbowo-Kolonia belongs to the group of lowland structures located in the floodplain parts of river valleys and formally represents the ring type with a double line of ramparts separated by a moat, with a narrow
卢布林省保护官员于2021年11月下令对Biała Podlaska地区Zalesie公社的Horbowo-Kolonia进行考古研究。这项研究的目的是为了更好地确定列入编号为AZP 60-88/88、第10号遗址的考古遗址记录中的加固定居点,并通过将其列入卢贝尔斯基省古迹登记册,使其受到保护。由于一年中的时间和季节有限,决定使用微创和非侵入性的研究方法-现代技术,地球物理和遥感。研究人员在加固的定居点和“podgrodzie”内准备了一系列几十次地质探测,用磁法进行地球物理勘探,无人机拍摄的航空照片,以及基于现场测量和激光雷达数据生成的地图,计划和3D模型,华沙大地测量和制图总部(GUGiK)提供的不同时期的正射光成像图分析。这项研究之前进行了档案研究。该项目位于Zalesie公社的西南部,位于Biała Podlaska地区的中部,距离Biała Podlaska以东约15公里。它位于河流堆积形成的沙质沉积物的末端,由遥远的过去蜿蜒而过的库尔兹那河形成。当地名称Horbow具有地形特征,与Horbek或Horby类型的同义词有关,来源于乌克兰语горб (horb)或鲁塞尼亚语горб (gorb),意思是驼峰,一座小山。在15世纪初,Horbowski (Zaranek-Horbowski)家族在该地区出现之前,Krzna上当地名字Horbow的词源基础就已经形成了。给Zaranek家族在Horbow的一个庄园导致了绰号horbowsyy的产生,随着时间的推移,它成为一个常用的姓氏。在地质探测的基础上,可以在现场区分出15种不同类型的地层。尽管诊断出的地层学给出了一个非常笼统的画面,但它允许研究人员计划未来的挖掘。通过试掘表明,城墙和护城河的遗迹保留了一些原始建筑的元素。在磁勘探过程中,捕获了许多可以被认为是考古特征和现代人类活动痕迹的异常现象。这组中有一个特殊的地方被M-1型特征所包围,这应该被解释为强化定居点主要(内部)壁垒的盒子结构的图像。更重要的是,入口大门也被定位。Horbowo-Kolonia的要塞属于位于河谷洪泛平原部分的低地构造群,形式上为环形类型,由护城河隔开的双线城墙,城墙间空间狭窄。内墙周长约140米,封闭面积约0.15公顷。外部城墙的周长最初约为207米。该遗址与部落时期的强化定居点有各种形式的类比,有时也在国家时期的开始发挥作用,例如在今天的卢布林省。要塞的直接腹地是与东面相邻的那部分高地,可以称之为“podgrodzie”。根据在“podgrodzie”中发现的两块陶器碎片,以及主城墙的建造和各种形式的类比,该物体最初的年代应该在8世纪到11世纪之间,并有9世纪到10世纪的迹象。
{"title":"Nieinwazyjne i małoinwazyjne badania archeologiczne grodziska w Horbowie-Kolonii, w powiecie bialskim, w województwie lubelskim, w roku 2021","authors":"Piotrowski Marcin, P. Piotrowska, E. Kłosińska","doi":"10.15584/misroa.2021.42.7","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.15584/misroa.2021.42.7","url":null,"abstract":"Archaeological research in Horbowo-Kolonia, Zalesie commune, Biała Podlaska district, in November 2021 was ordered by the Lublin Provincial Conservation Officer. The aim of the study was to identify better the fortified settlement included in the record of archaeological sites under the number AZP 60-88/88, site nr 10 and to put it under preservation order by entering it in the register of monuments of the Lubelskie Voivodeship. Due to the limited time and season of the year, it was decided to use minimally invasive and non-invasive methods of research - modern technologies, geophysics and remote sensing. Researchers prepared a series of several dozen geological probing, geophysical prospection with the magnetic method within the fortified settlement and the „podgrodzie”, aerial photographs from the drone, as well as the generation of maps, plans and 3D models based on field measurements and LiDAR data, analysis of orthophotomaps from various periods, provided by The Head Office of Geodesy and Cartography in Warsaw (GUGiK). The research was preceded by an archival research. The site is located in the south-western part of Zalesie commune, in the central part of Biała Podlaska district, about 15 km east of Biała Podlaska. It is located at the end of a sandy deposits formed as a result of river accumulation, shaped by the waters of the Krzna River, which meandered strongly in the distant past. The local name Horbow has a topographic character and is associated with the oronyms of the type Horbek or Horby, derived from the Ukrainian word горб (horb) or the Ruthenian горб (gorb) meaning hump, a slight hill. The etymological basis of the local name Horbow upon Krzna was certainly created before the appearance of the Horbowski (Zaranek-Horbowski) family in this area, which took place at the beginning of the 15th century. Giving the Zaranek family a manor in Horbow resulted in the creation of the nickname Horbowscy, which became a commonly used surname with time. On the basis of geological probing, it was possible to distinguish 15 different types of layers at the site. Even though, the diagnosed stratigraphy gives a very general picture, it allows the researchers to plan future excavations. As it was indicated by means of trial excavations, the relics of the ramparts and moats had preserved some elements of the original construction. During the magnetic prospection, many anomalies were captured that can be considered archaeological features and traces of human activity in the Modern period. A special place in this group is encompassed by the M-1 type feature, which should be interpreted as an image of the box structure of the main (internal) rampart of the fortified settlement. What is more, the entrance gate was also located. The stronghold in Horbowo-Kolonia belongs to the group of lowland structures located in the floodplain parts of river valleys and formally represents the ring type with a double line of ramparts separated by a moat, with a narrow","PeriodicalId":281758,"journal":{"name":"Materiały i Sprawozdania Rzeszowskiego Ośrodka Archeologicznego","volume":"35 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"114442685","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Енеолітичне поховання біля с. Колоколин у Верхньому Подністров’ї
Pub Date : 1900-01-01 DOI: 10.15584/misroa.2022.43.12
Oлександр Позіховський
In 1935, T. Sulimirski, in a grotto near the village of Kołokolin, examined two destroyed burials, which he referred to the third period of the Neolithic period in accordance with the contemporary periodization, and proposed separating a local group of the Lublin-Volyn culture. Currently, these burials are associated with the Lublin-Volyn culture. However, the analysis of the artefacts discovered indicates that they represent two different taxonomic units. One of them, containing an amphora, should be associated with the Lublin-Volyn culture, the others with the local group (phase) of the Pleszów-Modlnica Lengyel culture. This is confirmed by analogies both from settlements and burials of the aforementioned group (phase) from the Kraków region.
1935年,T. Sulimirski在Kołokolin村附近的一个石窟中,检查了两个被摧毁的墓葬,他将其与当代的年代划分称为新石器时代的第三个时期,并提出了分离卢布林-沃林文化当地群体的建议。目前,这些墓葬与卢布林-沃林文化有关。然而,对发现的人工制品的分析表明,它们代表两个不同的分类单位。其中一个装有双耳罐,应该与卢布林-沃林文化有关,其他的则与Pleszów-Modlnica Lengyel文化的当地群体(阶段)有关。上述群体(阶段)在Kraków地区的定居点和墓葬的类比证实了这一点。
{"title":"Енеолітичне поховання біля с. Колоколин у Верхньому Подністров’ї","authors":"Oлександр Позіховський","doi":"10.15584/misroa.2022.43.12","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.15584/misroa.2022.43.12","url":null,"abstract":"In 1935, T. Sulimirski, in a grotto near the village of Kołokolin, examined two destroyed burials, which he referred to the third period of the Neolithic period in accordance with the contemporary periodization, and proposed separating a local group of the Lublin-Volyn culture. Currently, these burials are associated with the Lublin-Volyn culture. However, the analysis of the artefacts discovered indicates that they represent two different taxonomic units. One of them, containing an amphora, should be associated with the Lublin-Volyn culture, the others with the local group (phase) of the Pleszów-Modlnica Lengyel culture. This is confirmed by analogies both from settlements and burials of the aforementioned group (phase) from the Kraków region.","PeriodicalId":281758,"journal":{"name":"Materiały i Sprawozdania Rzeszowskiego Ośrodka Archeologicznego","volume":"22 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"117086543","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Gliniane przedmioty zoomorficzne ze stanowiska w Korczowej 22, pow. jarosławski
Pub Date : 1900-01-01 DOI: 10.15584/misroa.2021.42.4
Michał Jabłkowski
In 2010, in connection with the planned construction of the A4 motorway, the Radymno-Korczowa junction, rescue excavations were undertaken, which provided the discovery of two clay zoomorphic objects, which are the subject of the article. These are: a fragment of a small, solid, longitudinal and cylindrical zoomorphic pendant and a miniature, fragmentarily preserved zoomorphic figurine. Figural art is rare in the Tarnobrzeg Lusatian culture. In the archaeological literature, this category of artefacts is dated from IV period of the Bronze Age to the Hallstatt period. The article shows that the most analogies can be found to the east of the area occupied by the Tarnobrzeg Lusatian culture. A common feature of all figural representations is the schematicism and simplicity of their performance as well as the dominance of images of farm animals. Figural art discovered in archaeological sites is identified with all forms of art. Such items are interpreted as objects of cult significance, children’s toys or manifestations of the magic sphere. The popularity of these representations and the influence of the „Eastern” cultures, especially the foreststepped zone of the Scythian cultural circle, on the Tarnobrzeg Lusatian culture suggest that both the pendant and the figurine uncovered at the site 22 in Korczowa should be associated with this cultural provenance.
2010年,与Radymno-Korczowa交界处A4高速公路的计划建设有关,进行了救援挖掘,发现了两个粘土兽形物体,这是本文的主题。这些是:一个小的,固体的,纵向和圆柱形的动物形吊坠碎片和一个小型的,残缺保存的动物形小雕像。在Tarnobrzeg lustian文化中,人物艺术是罕见的。在考古文献中,这类人工制品的年代从青铜时代的第四时期到哈尔施塔特时期。文章表明,在Tarnobrzeg - Lusatian文化所占据的地区以东,可以找到最多的类似物。所有图形表现的一个共同特征是其表现的图式性和简单性,以及农场动物形象的主导地位。在考古遗址中发现的人物艺术与所有形式的艺术一样。这些物品被解释为具有邪教意义的物品,儿童玩具或魔法球的表现。这些代表的流行和“东方”文化的影响,特别是斯基泰文化圈的森林地带,对Tarnobrzeg Lusatian文化的影响表明,在科尔奇瓦遗址发现的坠子和雕像都应该与这种文化起源有关。
{"title":"Gliniane przedmioty zoomorficzne ze stanowiska w Korczowej 22, pow. jarosławski","authors":"Michał Jabłkowski","doi":"10.15584/misroa.2021.42.4","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.15584/misroa.2021.42.4","url":null,"abstract":"In 2010, in connection with the planned construction of the A4 motorway, the Radymno-Korczowa junction, rescue excavations were undertaken, which provided the discovery of two clay zoomorphic objects, which are the subject of the article. These are: a fragment of a small, solid, longitudinal and cylindrical zoomorphic pendant and a miniature, fragmentarily preserved zoomorphic figurine. Figural art is rare in the Tarnobrzeg Lusatian culture. In the archaeological literature, this category of artefacts is dated from IV period of the Bronze Age to the Hallstatt period. The article shows that the most analogies can be found to the east of the area occupied by the Tarnobrzeg Lusatian culture. A common feature of all figural representations is the schematicism and simplicity of their performance as well as the dominance of images of farm animals. Figural art discovered in archaeological sites is identified with all forms of art. Such items are interpreted as objects of cult significance, children’s toys or manifestations of the magic sphere. The popularity of these representations and the influence of the „Eastern” cultures, especially the foreststepped zone of the Scythian cultural circle, on the Tarnobrzeg Lusatian culture suggest that both the pendant and the figurine uncovered at the site 22 in Korczowa should be associated with this cultural provenance.","PeriodicalId":281758,"journal":{"name":"Materiały i Sprawozdania Rzeszowskiego Ośrodka Archeologicznego","volume":"43 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"124422172","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Próba klasyfikacji typologicznej glinianych przęślików tarnobrzeskiej kultury łużyckiej
Pub Date : 1900-01-01 DOI: 10.15584/misroa.2021.42.3
Aleksandra Jabłkowska
The article deals with the issues of clay spindle whorls of the Tarnobrzeg Lusatian culture. It is a category of artefacts closely related to the textile manufacturing, but still quite often marginalized by archaeologists in the studies of the excavation materials. It is probably the effect of their commonness and obvious purpose. They are usually mentioned in short in the form of descriptions and figures. The article presents the first attempt at typological classification of clay spindle whorls of the Tarnobrzeg Lusatian culture, which was developed on the basis of the variability of the shapes of cross-sections of spindle whorls. In that way it was possible to distinguish eight basic types – spindle whorls with a rectangular crosssection (type I), spindle whorls with a lenticular cross-section (type II), spindle whorls with a biconvex cross-section (type III), spindle whorls with a plano-convex cross-section (type IV), spindle whorls with a convexo-concave cross-section (type V), spindle whorls with a lenticular-rectangular crosssection (type VI), spool-shaped spindle whorls (type VII) and miniature vessel shaped spindle whorls (type VIII). The material scope of the present research includes the finds of 129 spindle whorls coming from 41 sites of the Tarnobrzeg Lusatian culture. The analysed category of artefacts includes items discovered both at settlement and sepulchral sites, however, it should be noted that the items recorded in the second context are much rarer. The conclusions drawn from the research presented in the article are the issue of standardizing and systematizing the descriptions of spindle whorls in archaeological publications. In general, the descriptions should take into account the following data: the shape of the cross-section, the diameter, the height measured at the opening, the weight and any features visible on the external surfaces of the spindle whorls in the form of ornaments or damage. The secondary features are colour and an admixture tempering the clay. All the abovementioned parameters allow us to obtain a relatively complete image of an individual item and therefore they are helpful for archaeologists whose field of interest is prehistoric textiles. Moreover, remarkably valuable information is also the listing of this category of artefacts together with the materials found in a given feature, which allows drawing conclusions regarding their chronology. In addition, the article discusses the issues in the broadest possible range, aimed at presenting and developing various aspects related to spindle whorls. Due to detailed analyses, it has been proved that the spindle whorls can be a starting point for research on the importance of spindle whorls as a source for analysing and reconstructing the weaving of the population of the Tarnobrzeg Lusatian culture, research on the chronology and cultural relations of the described taxonomic unit as well as research on its rituals and social structures.
本文论述了塔诺布热格鲁萨田文化的粘土纺锤轮问题。它是与纺织制造业密切相关的一类人工制品,但在考古工作者对挖掘材料的研究中往往被边缘化。这可能是他们的共性和明显的目的的影响。它们通常以描述和数字的形式简短地提到。本文首次尝试对Tarnobrzeg Lusatian文化的粘土纺锤轮进行类型分类,该分类是在纺锤轮横截面形状变化的基础上发展起来的。这样就有可能区分出八种基本类型:矩形截面的锭子(I型)、透镜状截面的锭子(II型)、双凸截面的锭子(III型)、平凸截面的锭子(IV型)、凸凹截面的锭子(V型)、透镜状矩形截面的锭子(VI型)、线轴形主轴轮(VII型)和微型容器形主轴轮(VIII型)。本研究的材料范围包括在Tarnobrzeg Lusatian文化的41个遗址中发现的129个主轴轮。分析的人工制品类别包括在定居点和坟墓遗址发现的物品,但是,应该指出的是,在第二种情况下记录的物品要少得多。本文的研究结论是对考古出版物中对主轴螺杆的描述进行规范化和系统化的问题。一般来说,描述应考虑以下数据:横截面的形状,直径,在开口处测量的高度,重量以及在主轴螺纹的外表面以装饰或损坏的形式可见的任何特征。第二个特征是颜色和使粘土回火的混合物。所有上述参数使我们能够获得单个物品的相对完整的图像,因此它们对史前纺织品领域感兴趣的考古学家很有帮助。此外,非常有价值的信息还包括这类人工制品的清单以及在给定特征中发现的材料,这可以得出关于它们的年代的结论。此外,本文还在尽可能广泛的范围内讨论了问题,旨在介绍和发展与主轴螺纹有关的各个方面。通过详细的分析,证明纺锤轮可以作为分析和重建Tarnobrzeg Lusatian文化人口编织的重要来源,研究所描述的分类单位的年代学和文化关系,以及研究其仪式和社会结构的起点。
{"title":"Próba klasyfikacji typologicznej glinianych przęślików tarnobrzeskiej kultury łużyckiej","authors":"Aleksandra Jabłkowska","doi":"10.15584/misroa.2021.42.3","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.15584/misroa.2021.42.3","url":null,"abstract":"The article deals with the issues of clay spindle whorls of the Tarnobrzeg Lusatian culture. It is a category of artefacts closely related to the textile manufacturing, but still quite often marginalized by archaeologists in the studies of the excavation materials. It is probably the effect of their commonness and obvious purpose. They are usually mentioned in short in the form of descriptions and figures. The article presents the first attempt at typological classification of clay spindle whorls of the Tarnobrzeg Lusatian culture, which was developed on the basis of the variability of the shapes of cross-sections of spindle whorls. In that way it was possible to distinguish eight basic types – spindle whorls with a rectangular crosssection (type I), spindle whorls with a lenticular cross-section (type II), spindle whorls with a biconvex cross-section (type III), spindle whorls with a plano-convex cross-section (type IV), spindle whorls with a convexo-concave cross-section (type V), spindle whorls with a lenticular-rectangular crosssection (type VI), spool-shaped spindle whorls (type VII) and miniature vessel shaped spindle whorls (type VIII). The material scope of the present research includes the finds of 129 spindle whorls coming from 41 sites of the Tarnobrzeg Lusatian culture. The analysed category of artefacts includes items discovered both at settlement and sepulchral sites, however, it should be noted that the items recorded in the second context are much rarer. The conclusions drawn from the research presented in the article are the issue of standardizing and systematizing the descriptions of spindle whorls in archaeological publications. In general, the descriptions should take into account the following data: the shape of the cross-section, the diameter, the height measured at the opening, the weight and any features visible on the external surfaces of the spindle whorls in the form of ornaments or damage. The secondary features are colour and an admixture tempering the clay. All the abovementioned parameters allow us to obtain a relatively complete image of an individual item and therefore they are helpful for archaeologists whose field of interest is prehistoric textiles. Moreover, remarkably valuable information is also the listing of this category of artefacts together with the materials found in a given feature, which allows drawing conclusions regarding their chronology. In addition, the article discusses the issues in the broadest possible range, aimed at presenting and developing various aspects related to spindle whorls. Due to detailed analyses, it has been proved that the spindle whorls can be a starting point for research on the importance of spindle whorls as a source for analysing and reconstructing the weaving of the population of the Tarnobrzeg Lusatian culture, research on the chronology and cultural relations of the described taxonomic unit as well as research on its rituals and social structures.","PeriodicalId":281758,"journal":{"name":"Materiały i Sprawozdania Rzeszowskiego Ośrodka Archeologicznego","volume":"32 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"128099685","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
XVI-wieczny dwór obronny w Zgłobniu i jego nowa funkcja – Regionalna Składnica Zabytków Archeologicznych jako nowy oddział Muzeum Okręgowego w Rzeszowie
Pub Date : 1900-01-01 DOI: 10.15584/misroa.2021.42.10
M. Bober, J. Ligoda
The Regional Storehouse of Archaeological Artefacts in Zgłobień is located in a Renaissance defensive manor house. The building changed its function – after the reconstruction at the beginning of the 19th century it became a granary, and in the 21st century, after a major renovation and revitalization, it became a storehouse of archaeological finds, a branch of the District Museum in Rzeszów. The presented text describes the history of the aforementioned manor house, the results of the conducted research and the process of its revitalization. It is also a showcase of the new branch of the Regional Museum in Rzeszów, which was officially opened in May 2021. Zgłobień is a village founded in the 14th century, located about 15 km from Rzeszów, in the commune of Boguchwała. In the eastern part of the site, at the top of the elevation, there is a complex of manor buildings, consisting of the so-called new mansion from the 19th century, a former outbuilding and a farm building as well as a fortified manor coming from the 2nd half of the 16th century, which together with a vast yard are the oldest and most valuable point of the manor complex. The manor house in Zgłobień – as a historical construction – was identified in 1957, in the course of the inventory of monuments of the Rzeszów poviat carried out by B. & A. Fischinger. In 1975, it was taken under the conservator’s protection due to entering it in the register of monuments of the Podkarpackie Voivodeship (A-905 of May 31, 1975). The establishment of the defensive manor in Zgłobień is dated to the second half of the 16th century. It was a former residence of Anna Jordanowa and her daughter Anna, a wife of Mikołaj Spytek Ligęza from Rzeszów. In this way, the manor became the property of the heirs of this mighty family from Rzeszów. Then, for a short time it was owned by the Ciecierski family, who sold the manor to Teodor Lubomirski – the Voivode of Kraków in 1724. The possession in Zgłobień were included in the Boguchwała land estate. The owners of the property changed over the course of the 18th and 19th centuries. In the post-war times, the manor house became the property of the Communal Cooperative “Samopomoc Chłopska” in Boguchwała. The elements dating back to the erection of the manor are details preserved in situ – two architectural portals integrated into the vault. The original manor house was built of brick, on a rectangular plan, and it had a two-axis layout, one-bay arrangement with three rooms (a hall and two chambers). In the basement there were stone, vaulted cellars. Primarily, the building probably had the third storey (not preserved) where there should have been a manor chapel, known from the report of the visit of Bishop Radziwiłł (1595). At the beginning of the 19th century, the manor house lost its residential function – the new function of the residence was taken by the manor house built in the vicinity of the new complex by new owners of Zgłobień – the Straszewski. The old manor
Zgłobień的考古文物区域仓库位于文艺复兴时期的防御庄园。该建筑改变了它的功能-在19世纪初重建后,它成为一个谷仓,在21世纪,经过重大的翻新和振兴,它成为一个考古发现的仓库,Rzeszów地区博物馆的一个分支。本文描述了上述庄园的历史,所进行的研究结果和它的振兴过程。这也是2021年5月正式开放的Rzeszów地区博物馆新分馆的展示。Zgłobień是一个建于14世纪的村庄,位于Boguchwała公社中,距离Rzeszów约15公里。在基地的东部,在高地的顶部,有一个庄园建筑群,包括所谓的19世纪的新豪宅,一个前附属建筑和一个农场建筑,以及一个来自16世纪下半叶的强化庄园,连同一个巨大的院子是庄园建筑群中最古老和最有价值的地方。位于Zgłobień的庄园是一座历史建筑,于1957年在b.a. Fischinger对Rzeszów poviat古迹进行盘点的过程中被确认。1975年,由于它被列入Podkarpackie省的古迹登记册(1975年5月31日A-905号),它受到了管理员的保护。Zgłobień防御庄园的建立可以追溯到16世纪下半叶。这是来自Rzeszów的Mikołaj Spytek Ligęza的妻子Anna Jordanowa和她的女儿Anna的故居。就这样,庄园从Rzeszów开始成为这个强大家族继承人的财产。然后,它被切切尔斯基家族短暂拥有,他们在1724年将庄园卖给了Kraków的Voivode Teodor Lubomirski。Zgłobień的所有权被包括在Boguchwała的地产中。在18世纪和19世纪的过程中,该物业的所有者发生了变化。在战后时期,庄园成为Boguchwała社区合作社“Samopomoc Chłopska”的财产。庄园建造时的元素细节被原封不动地保留了下来——两个建筑入口与拱顶融为一体。原来的庄园房屋是砖砌的,在一个长方形的平面上,它有一个两轴布局,一个房间的安排,有三个房间(一个大厅和两个房间)。地下室里有拱顶的石质地窖。首先,该建筑可能有第三层(未保存),那里应该有一个庄园教堂,从主教Radziwiłł(1595)的访问报告中得知。在19世纪初,庄园失去了它的居住功能,住宅的新功能被Zgłobień的新主人Straszewski在新建筑群附近建造的庄园所取代。旧庄园接管了经济功能,从那时起,它就被称为庄园的粮仓。建筑的新功能使建筑的形状、立面和内部发生了一些变化。20世纪也开展了适应活动。1981年,对该建筑(位于Boguchwała的社区合作社“Samopomoc Chłopska”的当代仓库)进行了保护调查。结果发现,该建筑的总体状况不佳(包括地下室淹水,墙壁有明显缺陷,屋架和屋面状况不佳,建筑物的结构濒临灭绝)。1983年,该物品被Rzeszów地区博物馆永久使用,尽管直到20世纪80年代末,大地测量和法律手续仍在继续。最后,根据Podkarpackie Voivode于2000年12月8日作出的决定,该物业所在土地的所有者是Podkarpackie Voivodeship,该建筑物的永久用益人是Rzeszów的地区博物馆。与此同时,由于博物馆前馆长Sylwester Czopek的努力,博物馆正在寻找财政资源,以进行研究、记录和改造建筑物以储存考古发现。博物馆的下一任馆长Bogdan Kaczmar也继续开展了大量旨在振兴庄园的活动。2005年,由于计划修复该物体,Rzeszów大学考古研究所进行了考古研究(Bober 2005),以及检测多色存在的建筑研究;此外,还进行了建筑和真菌学专业知识。最终,在2009年,Rzeszów地区博物馆获得了建筑许可。Zgłobień设施的重建始于2010年,十年后完成。 Zgłobień的考古文物区域仓库位于文艺复兴时期的防御庄园。该建筑改变了它的功能-在19世纪初重建后,它成为一个谷仓,在21世纪,经过重大的翻新和振兴,它成为一个考古发现的仓库,Rzeszów地区博物馆的一个分支。本文描述了上述庄园的历史,所进行的研究结果和它的振兴过程。这也是2021年5月正式开放的Rzeszów地区博物馆新分馆的展示。Zgłobień是一个建于14世纪的村庄,位于Boguchwała公社中,距离Rzeszów约15公里。在基地的东部,在高地的顶部,有一个庄园建筑群,包括所谓的19世纪的新豪宅,一个前附属建筑和一个农场建筑,以及一个来自16世纪下半叶的强化庄园,连同一个巨大的院子是庄园建筑群中最古老和最有价值的地方。位于Zgłobień的庄园是一座历史建筑,于1957年在b.a. Fischinger对Rzeszów poviat古迹进行盘点的过程中被确认。1975年,由于它被列入Podkarpackie省的古迹登记册(1975年5月31日A-905号),它受到了管理员的保护。Zgłobień防御庄园的建立可以追溯到16世纪下半叶。这是来自Rzeszów的Mikołaj Spytek Ligęza的妻子Anna Jordanowa和她的女儿Anna的故居。就这样,庄园从Rzeszów开始成为这个强大家族继承人的财产。然后,它被切切尔斯基家族短暂拥有,他们在1724年将庄园卖给了Kraków的Voivode Teodor Lubomirski。Zgłobień的所有权被包括在Boguchwała的地产中。在18世纪和19世纪的过程中,该物业的所有者发生了变化。在战后时期,庄园成为Boguchwała社区合作社“Samopomoc Chłopska”的财产。庄园建造时的元素细节被原封不动地保留了下来——两个建筑入口与拱顶融为一体。原来的庄园房屋是砖砌的,在一个长方形的平面上,它有一个两轴布局,一个房间的安排,有三个房间(一个大厅和两个房间)。地下室里有拱顶的石质地窖。首先,该建筑可能有第三层(未保存),那里应该有一个庄园教堂,从主教Radziwiłł(1595)的访问报告中得知。在19世纪初,庄园失去了它的居住功能,住宅的新功能被Zgłobień的新主人Straszewski在新建筑群附近建造的庄园所取代。旧庄园接管了经济功能,从那时起,它就被称为庄园的粮仓。建筑的新功能使建筑的形状、立面和内部发生了一些变化。20世纪也开展了适应活动。1981年,对该建筑(位于Boguchwała的社区合作社“Samopomoc Chłopska”的当代仓库)进行了保护调查。结果发现,该建筑的总体状况不佳(包括地下室淹水,墙壁有明显缺陷,屋架和屋面状况不佳,建筑物的结构濒临灭绝)。1983年,该物品被Rzeszów地区博物馆永久使用,尽管直到20世纪80年代末,大地测量和法律手续仍在继续。最后,根据Podkarpackie Voivode于2000年12月8日作出的决定,该物业所在土地的所有者是Podkarpackie Voivodeship,该建筑物的永久用益人是Rzeszów的地区博物馆。与此同时,由于博物馆前馆长Sylwester Czopek的努力,博物馆正在寻找财政资源,以进行研究、记录和改造建筑物以储存考古发现。博物馆的下一任馆长Bogdan Kaczmar也继续开展了大量旨在振兴庄园的活动。2005
{"title":"XVI-wieczny dwór obronny w Zgłobniu i jego nowa funkcja – Regionalna Składnica Zabytków Archeologicznych jako nowy oddział Muzeum Okręgowego w Rzeszowie","authors":"M. Bober, J. Ligoda","doi":"10.15584/misroa.2021.42.10","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.15584/misroa.2021.42.10","url":null,"abstract":"The Regional Storehouse of Archaeological Artefacts in Zgłobień is located in a Renaissance defensive manor house. The building changed its function – after the reconstruction at the beginning of the 19th century it became a granary, and in the 21st century, after a major renovation and revitalization, it became a storehouse of archaeological finds, a branch of the District Museum in Rzeszów. The presented text describes the history of the aforementioned manor house, the results of the conducted research and the process of its revitalization. It is also a showcase of the new branch of the Regional Museum in Rzeszów, which was officially opened in May 2021. Zgłobień is a village founded in the 14th century, located about 15 km from Rzeszów, in the commune of Boguchwała. In the eastern part of the site, at the top of the elevation, there is a complex of manor buildings, consisting of the so-called new mansion from the 19th century, a former outbuilding and a farm building as well as a fortified manor coming from the 2nd half of the 16th century, which together with a vast yard are the oldest and most valuable point of the manor complex. The manor house in Zgłobień – as a historical construction – was identified in 1957, in the course of the inventory of monuments of the Rzeszów poviat carried out by B. & A. Fischinger. In 1975, it was taken under the conservator’s protection due to entering it in the register of monuments of the Podkarpackie Voivodeship (A-905 of May 31, 1975). The establishment of the defensive manor in Zgłobień is dated to the second half of the 16th century. It was a former residence of Anna Jordanowa and her daughter Anna, a wife of Mikołaj Spytek Ligęza from Rzeszów. In this way, the manor became the property of the heirs of this mighty family from Rzeszów. Then, for a short time it was owned by the Ciecierski family, who sold the manor to Teodor Lubomirski – the Voivode of Kraków in 1724. The possession in Zgłobień were included in the Boguchwała land estate. The owners of the property changed over the course of the 18th and 19th centuries. In the post-war times, the manor house became the property of the Communal Cooperative “Samopomoc Chłopska” in Boguchwała. The elements dating back to the erection of the manor are details preserved in situ – two architectural portals integrated into the vault. The original manor house was built of brick, on a rectangular plan, and it had a two-axis layout, one-bay arrangement with three rooms (a hall and two chambers). In the basement there were stone, vaulted cellars. Primarily, the building probably had the third storey (not preserved) where there should have been a manor chapel, known from the report of the visit of Bishop Radziwiłł (1595). At the beginning of the 19th century, the manor house lost its residential function – the new function of the residence was taken by the manor house built in the vicinity of the new complex by new owners of Zgłobień – the Straszewski. The old manor ","PeriodicalId":281758,"journal":{"name":"Materiały i Sprawozdania Rzeszowskiego Ośrodka Archeologicznego","volume":"34 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"131355394","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Statystyka w archeologii, czyli dlaczego nie trzeba bać się liczb
Pub Date : 1900-01-01 DOI: 10.15584/misroa.2021.42.6
Wojciech Rajpold
Archaeology, although it is a human science, draws from other areas of the world of science, especially from the achievements of natural sciences. Physics, chemistry and biology are widely used, for example in determining the chronology (C14, dendrology) or in the study of the chemical composition of artefacts (e.g. Raman spectroscopy). That is why it is not surprising that mathematics is also included in the arsenal of research methods used by archaeologists. The amount of archaeological materials widening the collection from year to year is impressive. However, it creates a huge challenge, including the one associated with the development of such a large number of sources. The artefacts obtained during excavations are massive, countable, therefore we can measure them and weigh them. So this is where statistics comes to the aid – the field of mathematics that organizes large numbers. The possibility of using statistical analyses can be found in many works of Polish researchers, and they show both richness and diversity, as well as usefulness of this field of science in archaeological studies. The first issue that should be indicated is the type of data surveyed by the statistics. There are two types: a) quantitative (measurable) – e.g. weight or length of the artefact (continuous data) or e.g. the number of coils on the pin head (discrete data); b) nominal (immeasurable; the variable gets a numerical label); they can be binary and multiple. This group also includes ordinal data – otherwise rankable – which arrange materials according to the intensity of the phenomenon. The type of data, in turn, determines the type of measurement scale which is going to be used. In archaeology, the socalled quotient scale gives the possibility to implement all statistic methods. In that case, we can measure weight and height. You can also use the so-called an ordinal scale that examines rankable data, where we grade the intensity of a specific feature. However, it is worth emphasizing that statistical data (depending on the methods) can be transformed so that they can be recorded in many ways and measured on various scales. In statistics, however, the most important issue is to examine whether the differences in the analysed groups are significant. For this purpose, the so-called chi^ 2, Kruskal-Wallis and U-Mann Whitney tests are used. The first test – the most common – compares the observed prevalence with the expected rates. With its help, you can check whether the ceramics obtained from a particular site is technologically homogeneous, for instance. The next two tests are used when data are expressed on measurable scales and are implemented to test the median. They can be used, inter alia, to check whether the differences in the thickness of the vessels from given areas are significant. What is most, commonly associated with statistics are various types of correlations, or interdependencies (e.g. Pearson correlation, Spearman’s Rank correlations, Kendall’s T
考古学虽然是一门人文科学,但它借鉴了世界上其他科学领域,尤其是自然科学的成就。物理、化学和生物学被广泛应用,例如确定年代学(C14、树木学)或研究人工制品的化学成分(如拉曼光谱)。这就是为什么数学也被包括在考古学家使用的研究方法的武器库中并不奇怪的原因。考古材料的数量逐年增加,令人印象深刻。然而,它带来了巨大的挑战,包括与开发如此大量的资源相关的挑战。在发掘过程中获得的文物是巨大的,可数的,因此我们可以测量和称重。这就是统计学的作用所在——组织大量数字的数学领域。使用统计分析的可能性可以在波兰研究人员的许多作品中找到,它们显示出丰富和多样性,以及这一科学领域在考古研究中的有用性。应该指出的第一个问题是统计所调查的数据类型。有两种类型:a)定量(可测量)-例如,人工制品的重量或长度(连续数据)或例如,针头上的线圈数量(离散数据);B)标称的;变量得到一个数字标签);它们可以是二进制和多个。这一组还包括有序数据——否则是可排序的——根据现象的强度排列材料。数据的类型反过来又决定了将要使用的测量尺度的类型。在考古学中,所谓的商量表提供了实现所有统计方法的可能性。在这种情况下,我们可以测量体重和身高。你也可以使用所谓的有序尺度来检查可排名的数据,在那里我们对特定特征的强度进行分级。然而,值得强调的是,统计数据(取决于方法)可以转换,以便以多种方式记录和以各种尺度测量。然而,在统计学中,最重要的问题是检查被分析群体之间的差异是否显著。为此,使用了所谓的chi^ 2、Kruskal-Wallis和U-Mann Whitney检验。第一个测试是最常见的,将观察到的患病率与预期的发病率进行比较。例如,在它的帮助下,您可以检查从特定地点获得的陶瓷在技术上是否同质。当数据在可测量的尺度上表示时,使用接下来的两个测试来测试中位数。除其他外,它们可以用来检查给定区域血管厚度的差异是否显著。最常与统计相关的是各种类型的相关性或相互依赖性(例如Pearson相关性,Spearman 's Rank相关性,Kendall 's Tau相关性)。然而,应该考虑的是,并不是所有的相关性都是研究特征之间的关系,因此在任何统计方法中,在阅读结果时保持一定程度的谨慎是非常重要的。最重要的是,允许考古学家将数据分组的方法在考虑时非常有用。最流行的是树突图和通信板。此外,ROC曲线上的截断点及其相关的比值比图也可能是一个重要的方法。毫无疑问,统计学最强大的力量是数学建模,它允许研究人员根据实证研究的结果,创建一个描述分析特征的公式。有许多类型的模型,如逻辑,线性和决策树。它们被广泛应用于医学、社会学和经济学等领域,也被应用于考古分析。最简单的模型类型是决策树,它对于数据的图形表示和所做决策的可能结果非常有用。在选择对我们正在研究的主题有最大影响的特征时,它也很有帮助。这样的一个例子是,根据遗骸的数量和骨灰盒的大小来确定死者的年龄(分为成人和儿童),其中指出了两个步骤,导致了死者年龄的正确指示。logit和判别模型则要复杂得多。可以为两个变量创建它们,例如分为成人和儿童的年龄,也可以为更多变量创建它们,例如时间顺序阶段。基本上,在这些模型中,我们得到一个公式,该公式基于所检查的特征,例如,关于年龄-遗骸的数量和骨灰盒的大小,以及年代-墙壁的厚度和颜色,向我们(在一定的概率下)哪个年龄组或年代可以与给定的考古特征联系起来。 最后,值得一提的是,随着新材料的不断涌入,统计分析对考古学的重要性将有系统地增加。特别是,有一些可用的统计程序(例如Statistica, R和RStudio)非常有用。然而,有必要记住,统计数据只是一个非常有用的工具,我们可以而且应该谨慎使用。 最后,值得一提的是,随着新材料的不断涌入,统计分析对考古学的重要性将有系统地增加。特别是,有一些可用的统计程序(例如Statistica, R和RStudio)非常有用。然而,有必要记住,统计数据只是一个非常有用的工具,我们可以而且应该谨慎使用。
{"title":"Statystyka w archeologii, czyli dlaczego nie trzeba bać się liczb","authors":"Wojciech Rajpold","doi":"10.15584/misroa.2021.42.6","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.15584/misroa.2021.42.6","url":null,"abstract":"Archaeology, although it is a human science, draws from other areas of the world of science, especially from the achievements of natural sciences. Physics, chemistry and biology are widely used, for example in determining the chronology (C14, dendrology) or in the study of the chemical composition of artefacts (e.g. Raman spectroscopy). That is why it is not surprising that mathematics is also included in the arsenal of research methods used by archaeologists. The amount of archaeological materials widening the collection from year to year is impressive. However, it creates a huge challenge, including the one associated with the development of such a large number of sources. The artefacts obtained during excavations are massive, countable, therefore we can measure them and weigh them. So this is where statistics comes to the aid – the field of mathematics that organizes large numbers. The possibility of using statistical analyses can be found in many works of Polish researchers, and they show both richness and diversity, as well as usefulness of this field of science in archaeological studies. The first issue that should be indicated is the type of data surveyed by the statistics. There are two types: a) quantitative (measurable) – e.g. weight or length of the artefact (continuous data) or e.g. the number of coils on the pin head (discrete data); b) nominal (immeasurable; the variable gets a numerical label); they can be binary and multiple. This group also includes ordinal data – otherwise rankable – which arrange materials according to the intensity of the phenomenon. The type of data, in turn, determines the type of measurement scale which is going to be used. In archaeology, the socalled quotient scale gives the possibility to implement all statistic methods. In that case, we can measure weight and height. You can also use the so-called an ordinal scale that examines rankable data, where we grade the intensity of a specific feature. However, it is worth emphasizing that statistical data (depending on the methods) can be transformed so that they can be recorded in many ways and measured on various scales. In statistics, however, the most important issue is to examine whether the differences in the analysed groups are significant. For this purpose, the so-called chi^ 2, Kruskal-Wallis and U-Mann Whitney tests are used. The first test – the most common – compares the observed prevalence with the expected rates. With its help, you can check whether the ceramics obtained from a particular site is technologically homogeneous, for instance. The next two tests are used when data are expressed on measurable scales and are implemented to test the median. They can be used, inter alia, to check whether the differences in the thickness of the vessels from given areas are significant. What is most, commonly associated with statistics are various types of correlations, or interdependencies (e.g. Pearson correlation, Spearman’s Rank correlations, Kendall’s T","PeriodicalId":281758,"journal":{"name":"Materiały i Sprawozdania Rzeszowskiego Ośrodka Archeologicznego","volume":"20 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"129504728","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Lightweight dwellings of the Funnel Beaker Culture from Vynnyky-Lysivka (Western Ukraine) and the phase CII of the Tripolye Culture from Gordinești II-Stînca goală (Northern Moldova) as examples of houses from the late 4 th Millennium BC 来自Vynnyky-Lysivka(乌克兰西部)的漏斗烧杯文化的轻型住宅,以及来自Gordinești ii - stnca goalei(北摩尔多瓦)的Tripolye文化CII阶段,作为公元前4千年晚期房屋的例子
Pub Date : 1900-01-01 DOI: 10.15584/misroa.2022.43.2
M. Rybicka, Andryi Hawinskyj, D. Król
The paper presents the issue of house constructions from the second half of the 4 th millennium BC in western Ukraine and northern Moldova. While numerous reports concerning the dwellings of the Funnel Beaker Culture from the area east of the Bug River has been published, these accounts did not provide enough information to precisely assess their construction details. The first such structure whose features can be described in detail is the house from the site Lysivka in Vynnyky. The construction of the dwelling was lightweight, analogous to residential structures from the eastern group of the Funnel Beaker Culture. Another debatable topic was the characteristics of houses of the Gordinești group of the Tripolye Culture. Archaeological research at the site of Gordinești II-Stînca goală proved that communities of the late stage of this culture lived in lightweight houses that were built using clay. Neither the residential structures from the Vynnyky-Lysivka site, nor those from the site of Gordineşti II-Stînca goală, should be regarded as analogy to the classical “ploshchadkas” of the Tripolye Culture.
本文介绍了公元前4千年下半叶乌克兰西部和摩尔多瓦北部的房屋建筑问题。虽然发表了许多关于布格河以东地区漏斗烧杯文化住宅的报道,但这些报道没有提供足够的信息来准确评估其建筑细节。第一个这样的结构,其特征可以详细描述是在Vynnyky的Lysivka基地的房子。住宅的结构很轻,类似于漏斗烧杯文化东部群体的住宅结构。另一个有争议的话题是Tripolye文化Gordinești群体的房屋特征。在Gordinești ii - st nca goalei遗址的考古研究证明,这种文化晚期的社区生活在用粘土建造的轻型房屋中。无论是来自Vynnyky-Lysivka遗址的住宅结构,还是来自ordine ii - st nca goalei遗址的住宅结构,都不应被视为Tripolye文化的经典“ploshchadkas”的类比。
{"title":"Lightweight dwellings of the Funnel Beaker Culture from Vynnyky-Lysivka (Western Ukraine) and the phase CII of the Tripolye Culture from Gordinești II-Stînca goală (Northern Moldova) as examples of houses from the late 4 th Millennium BC","authors":"M. Rybicka, Andryi Hawinskyj, D. Król","doi":"10.15584/misroa.2022.43.2","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.15584/misroa.2022.43.2","url":null,"abstract":"The paper presents the issue of house constructions from the second half of the 4 th millennium BC in western Ukraine and northern Moldova. While numerous reports concerning the dwellings of the Funnel Beaker Culture from the area east of the Bug River has been published, these accounts did not provide enough information to precisely assess their construction details. The first such structure whose features can be described in detail is the house from the site Lysivka in Vynnyky. The construction of the dwelling was lightweight, analogous to residential structures from the eastern group of the Funnel Beaker Culture. Another debatable topic was the characteristics of houses of the Gordinești group of the Tripolye Culture. Archaeological research at the site of Gordinești II-Stînca goală proved that communities of the late stage of this culture lived in lightweight houses that were built using clay. Neither the residential structures from the Vynnyky-Lysivka site, nor those from the site of Gordineşti II-Stînca goală, should be regarded as analogy to the classical “ploshchadkas” of the Tripolye Culture.","PeriodicalId":281758,"journal":{"name":"Materiały i Sprawozdania Rzeszowskiego Ośrodka Archeologicznego","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"129054883","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Uwagi o znaleziskach przedmiotów wykonanych z krzemienia pasiastego ze wschodniej części polskich Karpat i na ich przedpolu. Próba analizy chronologiczno-kulturowej i interpretacji
Pub Date : 1900-01-01 DOI: 10.15584/misroa.2019.40.4
Andrzej Pelisiak
{"title":"Uwagi o znaleziskach przedmiotów wykonanych z krzemienia pasiastego ze wschodniej części polskich Karpat i na ich przedpolu. Próba analizy chronologiczno-kulturowej i interpretacji","authors":"Andrzej Pelisiak","doi":"10.15584/misroa.2019.40.4","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.15584/misroa.2019.40.4","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":281758,"journal":{"name":"Materiały i Sprawozdania Rzeszowskiego Ośrodka Archeologicznego","volume":"29 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"121433018","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
期刊
Materiały i Sprawozdania Rzeszowskiego Ośrodka Archeologicznego
全部 Acc. Chem. Res. ACS Applied Bio Materials ACS Appl. Electron. Mater. ACS Appl. Energy Mater. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces ACS Appl. Nano Mater. ACS Appl. Polym. Mater. ACS BIOMATER-SCI ENG ACS Catal. ACS Cent. Sci. ACS Chem. Biol. ACS Chemical Health & Safety ACS Chem. Neurosci. ACS Comb. Sci. ACS Earth Space Chem. ACS Energy Lett. ACS Infect. Dis. ACS Macro Lett. ACS Mater. Lett. ACS Med. Chem. Lett. ACS Nano ACS Omega ACS Photonics ACS Sens. ACS Sustainable Chem. Eng. ACS Synth. Biol. Anal. Chem. BIOCHEMISTRY-US Bioconjugate Chem. BIOMACROMOLECULES Chem. Res. Toxicol. Chem. Rev. Chem. Mater. CRYST GROWTH DES ENERG FUEL Environ. Sci. Technol. Environ. Sci. Technol. Lett. Eur. J. Inorg. Chem. IND ENG CHEM RES Inorg. Chem. J. Agric. Food. Chem. J. Chem. Eng. Data J. Chem. Educ. J. Chem. Inf. Model. J. Chem. Theory Comput. J. Med. Chem. J. Nat. Prod. J PROTEOME RES J. Am. Chem. Soc. LANGMUIR MACROMOLECULES Mol. Pharmaceutics Nano Lett. Org. Lett. ORG PROCESS RES DEV ORGANOMETALLICS J. Org. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. A J. Phys. Chem. B J. Phys. Chem. C J. Phys. Chem. Lett. Analyst Anal. Methods Biomater. Sci. Catal. Sci. Technol. Chem. Commun. Chem. Soc. Rev. CHEM EDUC RES PRACT CRYSTENGCOMM Dalton Trans. Energy Environ. Sci. ENVIRON SCI-NANO ENVIRON SCI-PROC IMP ENVIRON SCI-WAT RES Faraday Discuss. Food Funct. Green Chem. Inorg. Chem. Front. Integr. Biol. J. Anal. At. Spectrom. J. Mater. Chem. A J. Mater. Chem. B J. Mater. Chem. C Lab Chip Mater. Chem. Front. Mater. Horiz. MEDCHEMCOMM Metallomics Mol. Biosyst. Mol. Syst. Des. Eng. Nanoscale Nanoscale Horiz. Nat. Prod. Rep. New J. Chem. Org. Biomol. Chem. Org. Chem. Front. PHOTOCH PHOTOBIO SCI PCCP Polym. Chem.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1