Pub Date : 2021-06-15DOI: 10.21697/im.2021.32.1.04
Kinga Szymańska
Z przeprowadzonych analiz wynika, że przedstawiciele doktryny prawa kanonicznego traktują parafilie jako zagrożenie dla małżeństwa i rodziny, traktując je jako przykład dezintegracji psychoseksualnej danej osoby. Zdaniem kanonistów omawiane odstępstwa mogą uniemożliwić zawarcie ważnego przymierza małżeńskiego ze względu na niezdolność parafilika do podjęcia i wypełnienia istotnych obowiązków małżeńskich, takich jak: ustanowienie małżeńskiej wspólnoty życia, ustanowienie więzi międzyosobowej między małżonkami, utrzymanie stałego, wiernego, wzajemnego i długotrwałego związku w celu utrzymania wspólnoty heteroseksualnej, urodzenia i wychowania potomstwa lub urzeczywistnienia współżycia intymnego humano modo. Jednak sama obecność parafilii nie przesądza o niezdolności osoby do zawarcia małżeństwa. W tym zakresie kanoniści zalecają uwzględnienie stopnia nasilenia danej anomalii, odwołując się tym samym do badań Urbano Navarrete i włoskiego psychiatry Gianfrancesco Zuanazziego. Jednocześnie należy unikać pochopnej oceny wagi danej parafilii i uważnie oceniać każdą przedstawioną sprawę, biorąc pod uwagę rodzaj odchylenia, jego cechy, a także osobowość kontrahenta.
{"title":"Parafilia a nieważność małżeństwa kanonicznego w wybranych publikacjach","authors":"Kinga Szymańska","doi":"10.21697/im.2021.32.1.04","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.21697/im.2021.32.1.04","url":null,"abstract":"Z przeprowadzonych analiz wynika, że przedstawiciele doktryny prawa kanonicznego traktują parafilie jako zagrożenie dla małżeństwa i rodziny, traktując je jako przykład dezintegracji psychoseksualnej danej osoby. Zdaniem kanonistów omawiane odstępstwa mogą uniemożliwić zawarcie ważnego przymierza małżeńskiego ze względu na niezdolność parafilika do podjęcia i wypełnienia istotnych obowiązków małżeńskich, takich jak: ustanowienie małżeńskiej wspólnoty życia, ustanowienie więzi międzyosobowej między małżonkami, utrzymanie stałego, wiernego, wzajemnego i długotrwałego związku w celu utrzymania wspólnoty heteroseksualnej, urodzenia i wychowania potomstwa lub urzeczywistnienia współżycia intymnego humano modo. Jednak sama obecność parafilii nie przesądza o niezdolności osoby do zawarcia małżeństwa. W tym zakresie kanoniści zalecają uwzględnienie stopnia nasilenia danej anomalii, odwołując się tym samym do badań Urbano Navarrete i włoskiego psychiatry Gianfrancesco Zuanazziego. Jednocześnie należy unikać pochopnej oceny wagi danej parafilii i uważnie oceniać każdą przedstawioną sprawę, biorąc pod uwagę rodzaj odchylenia, jego cechy, a także osobowość kontrahenta.","PeriodicalId":287198,"journal":{"name":"Ius Matrimoniale","volume":"151 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2021-06-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"133988619","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2020-12-15DOI: 10.21697/im.2020.31.2.04
Ryszard Sztychmiler
The work of ecclesiastical advocates depends on themselves, but also on certain working conditions in the ecclesiastical courts, shaped by diocesan bishops, judical vicars and all court staff. In the analysis of certain aspects of the work and remuneration of ecclesiastical advocates, I have distinguished issues on which solutions and proposals are unanimously accepted by the authors, then proposals that are unjustified or inconsistent with the facts, and finally I have drawn attention to debatable proposals. In the first part of the article, among the issues similarly assessed by both authors, I addressed the following issues: the importance of good cooperation between judges and advocates, court fees, the benefits of advocate's participation in proceedings and advocate's tasks. In the second part, in the face of some of Dr. Gałązka's misjudgements and unjustified proposals, I presented my separate opinions on various aspects concerning court fees, the need for advocates, the level of their work, further training of advocates and judges, advocate’s working time and their remuneration. In the third part, I presented some issues that should be elaborated upon in further discussions. These include, inter alia, certain aspects of court fees, their exemption or reduction, the nature and conditions of a advotace’s service and his/her participation in interrogations.
{"title":"Praca i honoraria adwokatów kościelnych","authors":"Ryszard Sztychmiler","doi":"10.21697/im.2020.31.2.04","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.21697/im.2020.31.2.04","url":null,"abstract":"The work of ecclesiastical advocates depends on themselves, but also on certain working conditions in the ecclesiastical courts, shaped by diocesan bishops, judical vicars and all court staff. In the analysis of certain aspects of the work and remuneration of ecclesiastical advocates, I have distinguished issues on which solutions and proposals are unanimously accepted by the authors, then proposals that are unjustified or inconsistent with the facts, and finally I have drawn attention to debatable proposals. \u0000In the first part of the article, among the issues similarly assessed by both authors, I addressed the following issues: the importance of good cooperation between judges and advocates, court fees, the benefits of advocate's participation in proceedings and advocate's tasks. In the second part, in the face of some of Dr. Gałązka's misjudgements and unjustified proposals, I presented my separate opinions on various aspects concerning court fees, the need for advocates, the level of their work, further training of advocates and judges, advocate’s working time and their remuneration. In the third part, I presented some issues that should be elaborated upon in further discussions. These include, inter alia, certain aspects of court fees, their exemption or reduction, the nature and conditions of a advotace’s service and his/her participation in interrogations.","PeriodicalId":287198,"journal":{"name":"Ius Matrimoniale","volume":"115 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2020-12-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"117158564","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2020-12-15DOI: 10.21697/im.2020.31.2.05
W. Góralski
The sentence of the Roman Rota, c. Caberletti, concerns the marriage of a 34-year-old man, which was concluded in a certain haste. Therefore, from the very beginning the parties lived side by side, and after less than two years they broke up. The immediate reason for the claimant's departure was the defendant's infertility. The case for nullity was initiated by a man pointing to two grounds of nullity: a mistake as to the attribute of a woman intended directly and principally (can. 1097 § 2 CIC) and the exclusion of the indissolubility of marriage by the woman (can. 1101 § 2 CIC). After the handing down (in 2006) of a negative verdict on both headings, the man resigned from the appeal. However, wishing to regulate his civil status, after eight years (in 2014) he applied for the nullity of his marriage to another Tribunal – this time due to a grave defect of discretion of judgment the essential matrimonial tights and duties mutually to be handed over and accepted (can. 1095, n. 2 CIC). Two years later, nullity of the marriage had not been ruled, and the man appealed against it to the Roman Rota, where a positive decision was made. The opinion of an expert in a rotating instance played a significant role in the positive outcome of the case.
罗马Rota的判决，c. Caberletti，涉及一个34岁的男人的婚姻，这是在一定的匆忙中结束的。因此，双方从一开始就住在一起，不到两年就分手了。原告离开的直接原因是被告不孕。无效的案例是由一个男人提出的，他指出了无效的两个理由:对女性属性的错误理解，直接和主要地(可以);《中华人民共和国民事诉讼法》第1097条第2款)和排除婚姻不可解除性的妇女(可以。1101§2 cic)。在法院(2006年)对这两个案件作出否定判决后，该男子辞去了上诉。然而，为了规范自己的公民身份，8年后(2014年)，他向另一个法庭申请婚姻无效——这一次由于判决自由裁量权的严重缺陷，基本的婚姻权利和义务需要相互移交和接受(可以)。1095, n. 2 CIC)。两年后，这段婚姻的无效性没有被裁定，这名男子向罗马法院提出上诉，法院做出了积极的裁决。专家的意见在轮流审理中对案件的积极结果起了重要作用。
{"title":"Poważny brak rozeznania oceniającego (kan. 1095, n. 2 KPK) w wyroku Roty Rzymskiej c. Caberletti z 20 listopada 2018 roku","authors":"W. Góralski","doi":"10.21697/im.2020.31.2.05","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.21697/im.2020.31.2.05","url":null,"abstract":"The sentence of the Roman Rota, c. Caberletti, concerns the marriage of a 34-year-old man, which was concluded in a certain haste. Therefore, from the very beginning the parties lived side by side, and after less than two years they broke up. The immediate reason for the claimant's departure was the defendant's infertility. The case for nullity was initiated by a man pointing to two grounds of nullity: a mistake as to the attribute of a woman intended directly and principally (can. 1097 § 2 CIC) and the exclusion of the indissolubility of marriage by the woman (can. 1101 § 2 CIC). After the handing down (in 2006) of a negative verdict on both headings, the man resigned from the appeal. However, wishing to regulate his civil status, after eight years (in 2014) he applied for the nullity of his marriage to another Tribunal – this time due to a grave defect of discretion of judgment the essential matrimonial tights and duties mutually to be handed over and accepted (can. 1095, n. 2 CIC). Two years later, nullity of the marriage had not been ruled, and the man appealed against it to the Roman Rota, where a positive decision was made. \u0000The opinion of an expert in a rotating instance played a significant role in the positive outcome of the case.","PeriodicalId":287198,"journal":{"name":"Ius Matrimoniale","volume":"137 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2020-12-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"123452613","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2020-12-15DOI: 10.21697/im.2020.31.2.08
Dawid Niemczycki
This gloss concerns the judgment of the Supreme Administrative Court of 8 May 2015, case II OSK 2416/13, in which the court stated that the legal interest conditioning the disclosure of personal data may be enjoyed not only in a trial before a secular court, but also in proceedings before ecclesiastical court. The gloss layout includes the introduction, the thesis of the order, premises of the factual and legal status, arguments of the Supreme Administrative Court, evaluation of the judgment and the conclusion. The author fully shares the justification of the judgment. Moreover, he points to the ground-breaking approach to the process of nullity of marriage before the ecclesiastical court, which is the basis for granting a legal interest in the procedure of disclosing personal data before a public administration body.
{"title":"Interes prawny a proces kościelny. Glosa aprobująca do wyroku Naczelnego Sądu Administracyjnego z dnia 08 maja 2015 r., II OSK 2416/13","authors":"Dawid Niemczycki","doi":"10.21697/im.2020.31.2.08","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.21697/im.2020.31.2.08","url":null,"abstract":"This gloss concerns the judgment of the Supreme Administrative Court of 8 May 2015, case II OSK 2416/13, in which the court stated that the legal interest conditioning the disclosure of personal data may be enjoyed not only in a trial before a secular court, but also in proceedings before ecclesiastical court. \u0000The gloss layout includes the introduction, the thesis of the order, premises of the factual and legal status, arguments of the Supreme Administrative Court, evaluation of the judgment and the conclusion. \u0000The author fully shares the justification of the judgment. Moreover, he points to the ground-breaking approach to the process of nullity of marriage before the ecclesiastical court, which is the basis for granting a legal interest in the procedure of disclosing personal data before a public administration body.","PeriodicalId":287198,"journal":{"name":"Ius Matrimoniale","volume":"147 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2020-12-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"127510654","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2020-12-15DOI: 10.21697/im.2020.31.2.09
Ginter Dzierżon
{"title":"Robert Gołębiowski, Il curatore processuale nelle causa di nullità matrimoniali secondo giurisprudenza rotale: funzione e costituzione, Gregorian & Biblical Press, Roma 2018, ss. 301.","authors":"Ginter Dzierżon","doi":"10.21697/im.2020.31.2.09","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.21697/im.2020.31.2.09","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":287198,"journal":{"name":"Ius Matrimoniale","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2020-12-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"128941278","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2020-12-15DOI: 10.21697/im.2020.31.2.07
Robert Kantor
W Kościele rzymskokatolickim władza sądownicza stanowi część władzy rządzenia, która zgodnie z kan. 135 KPK dzieli się na władzę ustawodawczą, wykonawczą i sądowniczą. Funkcja sądownicza zawiera się w sądzeniu, czyli w deklarowaniu i aplikowaniu prawa do pojedynczych sytuacji spornych. Władza ta przypisana jest jako własna papieżowi oraz biskupom, natomiast codziennie i praktycznie jest ona wykonywana w Kościele na sposób zastępczy przez osoby i struktury ustanowione na sposób stały do jej sprawowania, czyli przez Trybunały Apostolskie oraz trybunały biskupie. Jednym z takich trybunałów jest Trybunał Roty Nuncjatury Apostolskiej w Hiszpanii zwany Trybunałem Roty w Madrycie lub najczęściej nazywany po prostu Rotą Hiszpańską. Jest to trybunał zasadniczo apelacyjny i został utworzony na mocy przywileju Stolicy Apostolskiej w XVI w. Przedmiotem artykułu jest komentarz do wyroku, w którym kluczowe jest zagadnienie podwójnego rozpatrywania tej samej sprawy.
{"title":"\"Ne bis in eadem\" based on the judgement of the Tribunal of the Rota of the Apostolic Nunciature in Spain coram Carlos Morán Bustos of 15th June 2007","authors":"Robert Kantor","doi":"10.21697/im.2020.31.2.07","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.21697/im.2020.31.2.07","url":null,"abstract":"W Kościele rzymskokatolickim władza sądownicza stanowi część władzy rządzenia, która zgodnie z kan. 135 KPK dzieli się na władzę ustawodawczą, wykonawczą i sądowniczą. Funkcja sądownicza zawiera się w sądzeniu, czyli w deklarowaniu i aplikowaniu prawa do pojedynczych sytuacji spornych. Władza ta przypisana jest jako własna papieżowi oraz biskupom, natomiast codziennie i praktycznie jest ona wykonywana w Kościele na sposób zastępczy przez osoby i struktury ustanowione na sposób stały do jej sprawowania, czyli przez Trybunały Apostolskie oraz trybunały biskupie. \u0000Jednym z takich trybunałów jest Trybunał Roty Nuncjatury Apostolskiej w Hiszpanii zwany Trybunałem Roty w Madrycie lub najczęściej nazywany po prostu Rotą Hiszpańską. Jest to trybunał zasadniczo apelacyjny i został utworzony na mocy przywileju Stolicy Apostolskiej w XVI w. Przedmiotem artykułu jest komentarz do wyroku, w którym kluczowe jest zagadnienie podwójnego rozpatrywania tej samej sprawy.","PeriodicalId":287198,"journal":{"name":"Ius Matrimoniale","volume":"159 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2020-12-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"126019231","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2020-12-15DOI: 10.21697/im.2020.31.2.03
Marek Saj
Documents of the Second Vatican Council became essential root of the Canon Code Law of 1983. There is a number of references to conciliar constitutions, decrees and declarations in each Canon Book. This is true also in regard to the marital law included in Ćanons 1055-1165. Amongst sources which were inspirations for the aforementioned marital law there were the following constitutions: Sacrosanctum Concilium, Lumen gentium, and Gaudium et spes; and decrees: Orientalium...., Unitatis..., Christus...and Apostolicum and also Gravissimum. Lawmaker makes 34 references to these documents. The conducted analysis allows to show to what extend norms of the marital law remain under the influence of the Second Vatican Council.
梵蒂冈第二届大公会议的文件成为1983年《教会法典》的重要基础。在每本正典书中都有一些关于大公会议宪法、法令和宣言的参考文献。关于婚姻法(Ćanons 1055-1165)也是如此。在上述婚姻法的灵感来源中，有以下宪法:神圣不可侵犯(saccrosanctum Concilium)、人类共同(Lumen gentium)和男女平等(Gaudium et spes);法令:Orientalium...., Unitatis……, Christus……使徒和重礼。立法者在这些文件中引用了34次。所进行的分析可以表明，婚姻法的规范在多大程度上仍然受到梵蒂冈第二届大公会议的影响。
{"title":"Soborowe źródła prawa małżeńskiego w Kodeksie prawa kanonicznego z 1983 roku","authors":"Marek Saj","doi":"10.21697/im.2020.31.2.03","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.21697/im.2020.31.2.03","url":null,"abstract":"Documents of the Second Vatican Council became essential root of the Canon Code Law of 1983. There is a number of references to conciliar constitutions, decrees and declarations in each Canon Book. This is true also in regard to the marital law included in Ćanons 1055-1165. Amongst sources which were inspirations for the aforementioned marital law there were the following constitutions: Sacrosanctum Concilium, Lumen gentium, and Gaudium et spes; and decrees: Orientalium...., Unitatis..., Christus...and Apostolicum and also Gravissimum. Lawmaker makes 34 references to these documents. The conducted analysis allows to show to what extend norms of the marital law remain under the influence of the Second Vatican Council. ","PeriodicalId":287198,"journal":{"name":"Ius Matrimoniale","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2020-12-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"130687136","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2020-12-15DOI: 10.21697/im.2020.31.2.02
Kazimierz Dullak
Getting married in the Catholic Church should be preceded by preparation divided into three stages: further, closer and direct. In Poland, since June 1st , 2021, an episcopal document is in force, specifying in particular canonical and pastoral talks with the engaged couples. The earlier stages of marriage formation have been discussed in scattered legal acts. These documents have the scope of the universal Church and the others are in force in Poland. This study summarizes the regulations that are in force in Poland, regarding further and closer marriage preparation. Some changes were suggested, for the welfare of marriage.
{"title":"Przygotowanie dalsze i bliższe do małżeństwa po Dekrecie ogólnym Konferencji Episkopatu Polski z 2019 r.","authors":"Kazimierz Dullak","doi":"10.21697/im.2020.31.2.02","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.21697/im.2020.31.2.02","url":null,"abstract":"Getting married in the Catholic Church should be preceded by preparation divided into three stages: further, closer and direct. In Poland, since June 1st , 2021, an episcopal document is in force, specifying in particular canonical and pastoral talks with the engaged couples. The earlier stages of marriage formation have been discussed in scattered legal acts. These documents have the scope of the universal Church and the others are in force in Poland. This study summarizes the regulations that are in force in Poland, regarding further and closer marriage preparation. Some changes were suggested, for the welfare of marriage.","PeriodicalId":287198,"journal":{"name":"Ius Matrimoniale","volume":"145 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2020-12-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"127013391","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2020-12-15DOI: 10.21697/im.2020.31.2.10
W. Góralski
{"title":"Associazione Canonistica Italiana (a cura di), Diritto canonico e „Amoris laetitia”, Città del Vaticano, LEV, 2019, ss. 234","authors":"W. Góralski","doi":"10.21697/im.2020.31.2.10","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.21697/im.2020.31.2.10","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":287198,"journal":{"name":"Ius Matrimoniale","volume":"2015 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2020-12-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"129104200","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2020-12-15DOI: 10.21697/im.2020.31.2.06
Ginter Dzierżon
In the presented study the Author commented on the judgment of the Roman Rota c. Bottone of 2 February 2010. The analysis shows that the legal part of the rotal judgment was based on the general theory of a legal act. In the factual part ponens accumulated two titles exclusion of the good of the sacrament and exclusion of the good of faith. The invalidity of the marriage was proven using indirect proof. In the present case, it has been shown that what prompted the defendant to take such a step was the fact that even before the marriage she had maintained a relationship with another man. It was also proved that the plaintiff's exclusion of offspring was in close connection with the defendant's change of attitude towards him.
{"title":"Wykluczenie dobra sakramentu, dobra wiary oraz dobra potomstwa po stronie pozwanej, a także wykluczenie dobra potomstwa po stronie powodowej (kan. 1101 § 2 KPK) w wyroku Roty Rzymskiej c. Bottone z 2 lutego 2010 roku","authors":"Ginter Dzierżon","doi":"10.21697/im.2020.31.2.06","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.21697/im.2020.31.2.06","url":null,"abstract":"In the presented study the Author commented on the judgment of the Roman Rota c. Bottone of 2 February 2010. The analysis shows that the legal part of the rotal judgment was based on the general theory of a legal act. In the factual part ponens accumulated two titles exclusion of the good of the sacrament and exclusion of the good of faith. The invalidity of the marriage was proven using indirect proof. In the present case, it has been shown that what prompted the defendant to take such a step was the fact that even before the marriage she had maintained a relationship with another man. It was also proved that the plaintiff's exclusion of offspring was in close connection with the defendant's change of attitude towards him.","PeriodicalId":287198,"journal":{"name":"Ius Matrimoniale","volume":"251 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2020-12-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"132923871","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
京公网安备 11010802042870号
京ICP备2023020795号-1
扫码关注我们
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：