Pub Date : 2022-07-01DOI: 10.1097/PHH.0000000000001542
Reena B Chudgar, J. Fisher
{"title":"Seize the Opportunity to Reimagine Public Health.","authors":"Reena B Chudgar, J. Fisher","doi":"10.1097/PHH.0000000000001542","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1097/PHH.0000000000001542","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":296123,"journal":{"name":"Journal of public health management and practice : JPHMP","volume":"38 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2022-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"127473025","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
When faced with multiple competing priorities for investment in library resources, there are many important aspects to consider. From student enrollment to prominence of programs, there are both data ‐ driven and intangible factors to weigh. In addition, most library collections now focus on the immediate needs of students and researchers instead of collecting for posterity. This just ‐ in ‐ time versus just ‐ in ‐ case collection development mindset prioritizes different resource attributes and requires an often unfamiliar level of acquisitions flexibility. Collection development in academic libraries is challenging and complex. Some of the complexity is the result of numerous choices including, but not limited to: Collection building
{"title":"Where do we go from here?","authors":"P. R. Lee","doi":"10.1093/sw/36.1.3","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1093/sw/36.1.3","url":null,"abstract":"When faced with multiple competing priorities for investment in library resources, there are many important aspects to consider. From student enrollment to prominence of programs, there are both data ‐ driven and intangible factors to weigh. In addition, most library collections now focus on the immediate needs of students and researchers instead of collecting for posterity. This just ‐ in ‐ time versus just ‐ in ‐ case collection development mindset prioritizes different resource attributes and requires an often unfamiliar level of acquisitions flexibility. Collection development in academic libraries is challenging and complex. Some of the complexity is the result of numerous choices including, but not limited to: Collection building","PeriodicalId":296123,"journal":{"name":"Journal of public health management and practice : JPHMP","volume":"40 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2019-06-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"127520748","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2017-05-01DOI: 10.1097/PHH.0000000000000549
K. Bender, L. Beitsch, Jessica Kronstadt
{"title":"Development of a National Public Health Accreditation Program: A Case Study in Strategic Change Management and Sustainability.","authors":"K. Bender, L. Beitsch, Jessica Kronstadt","doi":"10.1097/PHH.0000000000000549","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1097/PHH.0000000000000549","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":296123,"journal":{"name":"Journal of public health management and practice : JPHMP","volume":"4 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2017-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"117053860","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2017-03-01DOI: 10.1097/PHH.0000000000000553
Karl Ensign
{"title":"The Value of Public Health.","authors":"Karl Ensign","doi":"10.1097/PHH.0000000000000553","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1097/PHH.0000000000000553","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":296123,"journal":{"name":"Journal of public health management and practice : JPHMP","volume":"13 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2017-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"129698230","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2017-03-01DOI: 10.1097/PHH.0000000000000541
P. Ashley, M. Freemer, P. Garbe, D. Rowson
The New York State Healthy Neighborhoods Program, as described in the accompanying articles, is an innovative program that addresses a number of the priority actions identified in the Coordinated Federal Action Plan to Reduce Racial and Ethnic Asthma Disparities (Action Plan), which was released in May 2012. The Action Plan was developed by a federal interagency working group under the auspices of the President’s Task Force on Environmental Health Risks and Safety Risks to Children. The objective of the task force is to identify priority issues within its purview that, at the federal level, can more effectively be addressed through coordinated interagency efforts, recommend and implement interagency actions, and communicate information to protect children from risks. Because of the relevance of environmental exposures and the importance of asthma as a childhood illness, the task force selected asthma as one of its focus areas. Disparities in childhood asthma are evidenced by a disproportionate rate of disease, worse asthma outcomes, and higher needs for acute medical care in some racial and ethnic minority populations. The prevalence of asthma among US children is 8.6%; however, the prevalence among black, non-Hispanic children is 13.4%. Children living in poverty also have a higher asthma prevalence at 10.4%. Furthermore, black children have a higher risk of mortality and a higher rate of emergency department visits for asthma than white or Hispanic children. Asthma is also a leading cause of missed school days, thus
{"title":"Coordinated Federal Actions Are Needed to Reduce Racial and Ethnic Disparities in Childhood Asthma.","authors":"P. Ashley, M. Freemer, P. Garbe, D. Rowson","doi":"10.1097/PHH.0000000000000541","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1097/PHH.0000000000000541","url":null,"abstract":"The New York State Healthy Neighborhoods Program, as described in the accompanying articles, is an innovative program that addresses a number of the priority actions identified in the Coordinated Federal Action Plan to Reduce Racial and Ethnic Asthma Disparities (Action Plan), which was released in May 2012. The Action Plan was developed by a federal interagency working group under the auspices of the President’s Task Force on Environmental Health Risks and Safety Risks to Children. The objective of the task force is to identify priority issues within its purview that, at the federal level, can more effectively be addressed through coordinated interagency efforts, recommend and implement interagency actions, and communicate information to protect children from risks. Because of the relevance of environmental exposures and the importance of asthma as a childhood illness, the task force selected asthma as one of its focus areas. Disparities in childhood asthma are evidenced by a disproportionate rate of disease, worse asthma outcomes, and higher needs for acute medical care in some racial and ethnic minority populations. The prevalence of asthma among US children is 8.6%; however, the prevalence among black, non-Hispanic children is 13.4%. Children living in poverty also have a higher asthma prevalence at 10.4%. Furthermore, black children have a higher risk of mortality and a higher rate of emergency department visits for asthma than white or Hispanic children. Asthma is also a leading cause of missed school days, thus","PeriodicalId":296123,"journal":{"name":"Journal of public health management and practice : JPHMP","volume":"39 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2017-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"122432807","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2016-11-01DOI: 10.1097/PHH.0000000000000505
M. Lichtveld
{"title":"A Timely Reflection on the Public Health Workforce.","authors":"M. Lichtveld","doi":"10.1097/PHH.0000000000000505","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1097/PHH.0000000000000505","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":296123,"journal":{"name":"Journal of public health management and practice : JPHMP","volume":"47 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2016-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"123611597","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2016-11-01DOI: 10.1097/PHH.0000000000000410
María L. Gómez, R. Charnigo, T. Harris, John C. Williams, W. Pfeifle
CONTEXT Findings from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention suggest that addressing persistent health disparities based on race and ethnicity must become a national priority. The field of cultural and linguistic competency has gained national attention by improving access to and quality of health care, patient-provider communication, health outcomes, and health equity for minority groups and other vulnerable or special needs populations. OBJECTIVES (1) To measure how local health departments (LHDs) in Kentucky comply with the National Standards for Culturally and Linguistically Appropriate Services (CLAS); and (2) to provide policy recommendation based on the findings. This study is the first to assess a statewide public health system under the lens of CLAS. DESIGN Analysis of cross-sectional survey. SETTING Electronic surveys administered to LHD administrators in Kentucky. PARTICIPANTS Public health directors, nurse leaders, and program managers. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE Levels of compliance with various CLAS standards were examined for rural and urban counties using a novel scoring method. RESULTS A total of 159 LHD administrators received the survey. Response rate was 67% (106 participants). Rural and urban LHDs achieved moderate compliance on domains of plans and policies, quality monitoring and improvement for needs assessment, management information systems for clients, and staff training and development. Both geographic groups exhibited lesser compliance on domains of organizational governance, culturally inclusive health care environment for educational materials, and diversity of personnel recruitment. CONCLUSION County and district LHDs in Kentucky have implemented activities and policies that comply with CLAS standards at levels that vary by domain. Areas requiring particular attention include organizational governance, culturally inclusive health care environment for educational materials, and diversity of personnel. Improvements in these areas may help LHDs better meet the needs of vulnerable populations, racial and ethnic minorities, and special needs groups. CLAS practices may allow organizations to adhere to national public health accreditation standards.
{"title":"Assessment of National CLAS Standards in Rural and Urban Local Health Departments in Kentucky.","authors":"María L. Gómez, R. Charnigo, T. Harris, John C. Williams, W. Pfeifle","doi":"10.1097/PHH.0000000000000410","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1097/PHH.0000000000000410","url":null,"abstract":"CONTEXT\u0000Findings from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention suggest that addressing persistent health disparities based on race and ethnicity must become a national priority. The field of cultural and linguistic competency has gained national attention by improving access to and quality of health care, patient-provider communication, health outcomes, and health equity for minority groups and other vulnerable or special needs populations.\u0000\u0000\u0000OBJECTIVES\u0000(1) To measure how local health departments (LHDs) in Kentucky comply with the National Standards for Culturally and Linguistically Appropriate Services (CLAS); and (2) to provide policy recommendation based on the findings. This study is the first to assess a statewide public health system under the lens of CLAS.\u0000\u0000\u0000DESIGN\u0000Analysis of cross-sectional survey.\u0000\u0000\u0000SETTING\u0000Electronic surveys administered to LHD administrators in Kentucky.\u0000\u0000\u0000PARTICIPANTS\u0000Public health directors, nurse leaders, and program managers.\u0000\u0000\u0000MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE\u0000Levels of compliance with various CLAS standards were examined for rural and urban counties using a novel scoring method.\u0000\u0000\u0000RESULTS\u0000A total of 159 LHD administrators received the survey. Response rate was 67% (106 participants). Rural and urban LHDs achieved moderate compliance on domains of plans and policies, quality monitoring and improvement for needs assessment, management information systems for clients, and staff training and development. Both geographic groups exhibited lesser compliance on domains of organizational governance, culturally inclusive health care environment for educational materials, and diversity of personnel recruitment.\u0000\u0000\u0000CONCLUSION\u0000County and district LHDs in Kentucky have implemented activities and policies that comply with CLAS standards at levels that vary by domain. Areas requiring particular attention include organizational governance, culturally inclusive health care environment for educational materials, and diversity of personnel. Improvements in these areas may help LHDs better meet the needs of vulnerable populations, racial and ethnic minorities, and special needs groups. CLAS practices may allow organizations to adhere to national public health accreditation standards.","PeriodicalId":296123,"journal":{"name":"Journal of public health management and practice : JPHMP","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2016-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"129992711","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2016-11-01DOI: 10.1097/PHH.0000000000000347
Aila Hoss, A. Menon, L. Corso
CONTEXT Public health enabling authorities establish the legal foundation for financing, organizing, and delivering public health services. State laws vary in terms of the content, depth, and breadth of these fundamental public health activities. Given this variance, the Institute of Medicine has identified state public health laws as an area that requires further examination. To respond to this call for further examination, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention's Public Health Law Program conducted a fundamental activities legal assessment on state public health laws. OBJECTIVE The goal of the legal assessment was to examine state laws referencing frameworks representing public health department fundamental activities (ie, core and essential services) in an effort to identify, catalog, and describe enabling authorities of state governmental public health systems. DESIGN In 2013, Public Health Law Program staff compiled a list of state statutes and regulations referencing different commonly-recognized public health frameworks of fundamental activities. The legal assessment included state fundamental activities laws available on WestlawNext as of July 2013. The results related to the 10 essential public health services and the 3 core public health functions were confirmed and updated in June 2016. RESULTS Eighteen states reference commonly-recognized frameworks of fundamental activities in their laws. Thirteen states have listed the 10 essential public health services in their laws. Eight of these states have also referenced the 3 core public health functions in their laws. Five states reference only the core public health functions. CONCLUSIONS Several states reference fundamental activities in their state laws, particularly through use of the essential services framework. Further work is needed to capture the public health laws and practices of states that may be performing fundamental activities but without reference to a common framework.
{"title":"State Public Health Enabling Authorities: Results of a Fundamental Activities Assessment Examining Core and Essential Services.","authors":"Aila Hoss, A. Menon, L. Corso","doi":"10.1097/PHH.0000000000000347","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1097/PHH.0000000000000347","url":null,"abstract":"CONTEXT\u0000Public health enabling authorities establish the legal foundation for financing, organizing, and delivering public health services. State laws vary in terms of the content, depth, and breadth of these fundamental public health activities. Given this variance, the Institute of Medicine has identified state public health laws as an area that requires further examination. To respond to this call for further examination, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention's Public Health Law Program conducted a fundamental activities legal assessment on state public health laws.\u0000\u0000\u0000OBJECTIVE\u0000The goal of the legal assessment was to examine state laws referencing frameworks representing public health department fundamental activities (ie, core and essential services) in an effort to identify, catalog, and describe enabling authorities of state governmental public health systems.\u0000\u0000\u0000DESIGN\u0000In 2013, Public Health Law Program staff compiled a list of state statutes and regulations referencing different commonly-recognized public health frameworks of fundamental activities. The legal assessment included state fundamental activities laws available on WestlawNext as of July 2013. The results related to the 10 essential public health services and the 3 core public health functions were confirmed and updated in June 2016.\u0000\u0000\u0000RESULTS\u0000Eighteen states reference commonly-recognized frameworks of fundamental activities in their laws. Thirteen states have listed the 10 essential public health services in their laws. Eight of these states have also referenced the 3 core public health functions in their laws. Five states reference only the core public health functions.\u0000\u0000\u0000CONCLUSIONS\u0000Several states reference fundamental activities in their state laws, particularly through use of the essential services framework. Further work is needed to capture the public health laws and practices of states that may be performing fundamental activities but without reference to a common framework.","PeriodicalId":296123,"journal":{"name":"Journal of public health management and practice : JPHMP","volume":"9 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2016-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"124060579","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2016-11-01DOI: 10.1097/PHH.0000000000000494
Ana Penman-Aguilar, M. Talih, R. Moonesinghe, David T. Huang
In his commentary on our article, Scanlan raises important issues to consider in measurement of health disparities,2 specifically that when measured on the relative scale, disparities are affected by the prevalence of the outcome; that whether disparities are found to be increasing or decreasing depends on whether they are assessed in terms of a favorable outcome or its complementary adverse outcome; and that dependence on prevalence is not only limited to relative measures such as the rate ratio but that the absolute difference also varies with prevalence. These issues were discussed a decade ago in this journal. The goal of our article was to identify a handful of broad practices in monitoring health disparities, health inequities, and social determinants of health to support the pursuit of health equity in the United States; it was not to describe all of the implications of measurement choices. Furthermore, in our view, Scanlan’s commentary supports one of the 5 practices that we set forth: “Provide reasons for methodological choices and clarify their implications” and is not relevant to the other 4. The commentary’s attention to potential pitfalls of relying solely on particular measures (beyond the pitfalls we had space to highlight in an article of limited length) bolsters the urgency of our call for transparency and, relatedly, for “intensive and systematic training . . . for the workforce at the national, state, and local levels.” Although it presents a compelling case study, the commentary does not resolve measurement conundrums. The commentary proposes that disparities be measured using an “estimated effect size” (EES).2 This
{"title":"Response to Scanlan Concerning: Measurement of Health Disparities, Health Inequities, and Social Determinants of Health to Support the Advancement of Health Equity.","authors":"Ana Penman-Aguilar, M. Talih, R. Moonesinghe, David T. Huang","doi":"10.1097/PHH.0000000000000494","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1097/PHH.0000000000000494","url":null,"abstract":"In his commentary on our article, Scanlan raises important issues to consider in measurement of health disparities,2 specifically that when measured on the relative scale, disparities are affected by the prevalence of the outcome; that whether disparities are found to be increasing or decreasing depends on whether they are assessed in terms of a favorable outcome or its complementary adverse outcome; and that dependence on prevalence is not only limited to relative measures such as the rate ratio but that the absolute difference also varies with prevalence. These issues were discussed a decade ago in this journal. The goal of our article was to identify a handful of broad practices in monitoring health disparities, health inequities, and social determinants of health to support the pursuit of health equity in the United States; it was not to describe all of the implications of measurement choices. Furthermore, in our view, Scanlan’s commentary supports one of the 5 practices that we set forth: “Provide reasons for methodological choices and clarify their implications” and is not relevant to the other 4. The commentary’s attention to potential pitfalls of relying solely on particular measures (beyond the pitfalls we had space to highlight in an article of limited length) bolsters the urgency of our call for transparency and, relatedly, for “intensive and systematic training . . . for the workforce at the national, state, and local levels.” Although it presents a compelling case study, the commentary does not resolve measurement conundrums. The commentary proposes that disparities be measured using an “estimated effect size” (EES).2 This","PeriodicalId":296123,"journal":{"name":"Journal of public health management and practice : JPHMP","volume":"22 6 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2016-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"130217805","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2016-11-01DOI: 10.1097/PHH.0000000000000402
T. Klaiman, Anjali Chainani, B. Bekemeier
OBJECTIVES The purpose of this study was to identify unique practices underway in communities that have been empirically identified as having achieved exceptional maternal and child health (MCH) outcomes compared with their peers. METHODS We used a qualitative, positive deviance approach to identify practices implemented by local health department (LHD) jurisdictions in Florida, Washington, and New York that achieved better MCH outcomes than expected compared with their in-state peer jurisdictions. We identified a total of 50 LHDs in jurisdictions that had better than expected MCH outcomes compared with their peers, and we conducted 39 hour-long semistructured interviews with LHD staff. We conducted inductive thematic analysis to identify key themes and subthemes across all LHD cases in the sample. RESULTS Partnerships with providers, partnerships for data collection/assessment, and partnerships with community-based organizations were associated with exceptional MCH outcomes based on our interviews. DISCUSSION This study offers specific examples of practices LHDs can implement to improve MCH outcomes, even with limited resources, based on the practices of high-performing local health jurisdictions.
{"title":"The Importance of Partnerships in Local Health Department Practice Among Communities With Exceptional Maternal and Child Health Outcomes.","authors":"T. Klaiman, Anjali Chainani, B. Bekemeier","doi":"10.1097/PHH.0000000000000402","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1097/PHH.0000000000000402","url":null,"abstract":"OBJECTIVES\u0000The purpose of this study was to identify unique practices underway in communities that have been empirically identified as having achieved exceptional maternal and child health (MCH) outcomes compared with their peers.\u0000\u0000\u0000METHODS\u0000We used a qualitative, positive deviance approach to identify practices implemented by local health department (LHD) jurisdictions in Florida, Washington, and New York that achieved better MCH outcomes than expected compared with their in-state peer jurisdictions. We identified a total of 50 LHDs in jurisdictions that had better than expected MCH outcomes compared with their peers, and we conducted 39 hour-long semistructured interviews with LHD staff. We conducted inductive thematic analysis to identify key themes and subthemes across all LHD cases in the sample.\u0000\u0000\u0000RESULTS\u0000Partnerships with providers, partnerships for data collection/assessment, and partnerships with community-based organizations were associated with exceptional MCH outcomes based on our interviews.\u0000\u0000\u0000DISCUSSION\u0000This study offers specific examples of practices LHDs can implement to improve MCH outcomes, even with limited resources, based on the practices of high-performing local health jurisdictions.","PeriodicalId":296123,"journal":{"name":"Journal of public health management and practice : JPHMP","volume":"350 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2016-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"125628584","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
京公网安备 11010802042870号
京ICP备2023020795号-1
扫码关注我们
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：