Pub Date : 2022-01-01DOI: 10.1097/PHH.0000000000001438
Rose L Molina, Amanda DiMeo, Leigh Graham, Grace Galvin, Neel Shah, Ana Langer
Community-based organizations are uniquely positioned to address critical gaps in social support that contribute to inequities in maternal health. Using a human-centered design process, we held 3 design workshops with members of 15 organizations in Greater Boston, including community-based organizations, allied hospital systems, and public health departments, to assess proposed solutions for gaps in social support services during pregnancy and the first year after childbirth. The workshops focused on solutions to problems that emerged from a mixed-methods research study with community-based organizations that provide social support services; workshop attendees explored facilitators and barriers to implementing solutions. Key considerations included colocation of solutions, shared ownership of program and client data, decision making about triage and referrals, and strengthening coordination of existing programs. Collaborative design workshops surfaced potential solutions to improve coordination of services, which require addressing structural and interpersonal racism in Greater Boston.
{"title":"Racial/Ethnic Inequities in Pregnancy-Related Social Support: Design Workshops With Community-Based Organizations in Greater Boston.","authors":"Rose L Molina, Amanda DiMeo, Leigh Graham, Grace Galvin, Neel Shah, Ana Langer","doi":"10.1097/PHH.0000000000001438","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1097/PHH.0000000000001438","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Community-based organizations are uniquely positioned to address critical gaps in social support that contribute to inequities in maternal health. Using a human-centered design process, we held 3 design workshops with members of 15 organizations in Greater Boston, including community-based organizations, allied hospital systems, and public health departments, to assess proposed solutions for gaps in social support services during pregnancy and the first year after childbirth. The workshops focused on solutions to problems that emerged from a mixed-methods research study with community-based organizations that provide social support services; workshop attendees explored facilitators and barriers to implementing solutions. Key considerations included colocation of solutions, shared ownership of program and client data, decision making about triage and referrals, and strengthening coordination of existing programs. Collaborative design workshops surfaced potential solutions to improve coordination of services, which require addressing structural and interpersonal racism in Greater Boston.</p>","PeriodicalId":296123,"journal":{"name":"Journal of public health management and practice : JPHMP","volume":" ","pages":"S66-S69"},"PeriodicalIF":3.3,"publicationDate":"2022-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"39891792","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2022-01-01DOI: 10.1097/PHH.0000000000001295
Sara Niesobecki, Heather Rutz, Linda Niccolai, Sarah Hook, Katherine Feldman, Alison Hinckley
Tick-borne diseases (TBDs) are increasing despite prevention recommendations. We explored whether cost is a barrier to prevention use in Connecticut and Maryland, using a cross-sectional survey. Respondents were queried regarding their willingness to pay for chemical, natural, and rodent-targeted yard pesticide treatments and permethrin-treated clothing. We evaluated associations between demographics, TBD knowledge and attitudes, and willingness to pay for prevention methods. Most respondents would pay for yard treatments (85%); 95% preferring natural pesticide, and 82% would pay for permethrin-treated clothing. Most did not want to pay more than $99 for any of the yard treatments. Having a household income of $100 000 was associated with willingness to pay $100 or more for chemical, natural, or rodent-targeted treatments and $25 or more for permethrin self-treated and pretreated clothing. Yard treatments, especially natural pesticides, were acceptable for TBD prevention; however, current pricing may be cost-prohibitive. Permethrin-treated clothing may be an affordable and acceptable prevention method.
{"title":"Willingness to Pay for Select Tick-Borne Disease Prevention Measures in Endemic Areas.","authors":"Sara Niesobecki, Heather Rutz, Linda Niccolai, Sarah Hook, Katherine Feldman, Alison Hinckley","doi":"10.1097/PHH.0000000000001295","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1097/PHH.0000000000001295","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Tick-borne diseases (TBDs) are increasing despite prevention recommendations. We explored whether cost is a barrier to prevention use in Connecticut and Maryland, using a cross-sectional survey. Respondents were queried regarding their willingness to pay for chemical, natural, and rodent-targeted yard pesticide treatments and permethrin-treated clothing. We evaluated associations between demographics, TBD knowledge and attitudes, and willingness to pay for prevention methods. Most respondents would pay for yard treatments (85%); 95% preferring natural pesticide, and 82% would pay for permethrin-treated clothing. Most did not want to pay more than $99 for any of the yard treatments. Having a household income of $100 000 was associated with willingness to pay $100 or more for chemical, natural, or rodent-targeted treatments and $25 or more for permethrin self-treated and pretreated clothing. Yard treatments, especially natural pesticides, were acceptable for TBD prevention; however, current pricing may be cost-prohibitive. Permethrin-treated clothing may be an affordable and acceptable prevention method.</p>","PeriodicalId":296123,"journal":{"name":"Journal of public health management and practice : JPHMP","volume":" ","pages":"E37-E42"},"PeriodicalIF":3.3,"publicationDate":"2022-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"25496715","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
On opposite ends of North Carolina, collaborations in Buncombe and Chatham counties are tackling infant mortality inequities with innovative strategies. While their strategies differ, both groups use an approach that is driven by authentic community voice and directly contributes to dismantling structural racism. The Mountain Area Health Education Center in Asheville is transitioning their leadership of the Mothering Asheville Coalition to SistasCaring4Sistas, a group of Black doulas with lived experience, and is supporting the doulas' work to become a nonprofit organization that will serve the entire state. Chatham County Health Department leads the Equity for Moms and Babies Realized Across Chatham Coalition, a group that relies on recommendations from birthing individuals with lived experience to continually assess and revise hospital policies and practices to improve birth experiences in addition to birth outcomes. The work of these communities highlights several implications for advancing health equity, including the need to establish and maintain trust with the community served, include those with lived experience and expertise in decision making, guide strategies, take risks, and facilitate organizational culture change.
{"title":"The Power of Community in Addressing Infant Mortality Inequities.","authors":"Grace Gorenflo, Naomi Rich, Maggie Adams-McBride, Casey Hilliard","doi":"10.1097/PHH.0000000000001433","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1097/PHH.0000000000001433","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>On opposite ends of North Carolina, collaborations in Buncombe and Chatham counties are tackling infant mortality inequities with innovative strategies. While their strategies differ, both groups use an approach that is driven by authentic community voice and directly contributes to dismantling structural racism. The Mountain Area Health Education Center in Asheville is transitioning their leadership of the Mothering Asheville Coalition to SistasCaring4Sistas, a group of Black doulas with lived experience, and is supporting the doulas' work to become a nonprofit organization that will serve the entire state. Chatham County Health Department leads the Equity for Moms and Babies Realized Across Chatham Coalition, a group that relies on recommendations from birthing individuals with lived experience to continually assess and revise hospital policies and practices to improve birth experiences in addition to birth outcomes. The work of these communities highlights several implications for advancing health equity, including the need to establish and maintain trust with the community served, include those with lived experience and expertise in decision making, guide strategies, take risks, and facilitate organizational culture change.</p>","PeriodicalId":296123,"journal":{"name":"Journal of public health management and practice : JPHMP","volume":" ","pages":"S70-S73"},"PeriodicalIF":3.3,"publicationDate":"2022-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"39905919","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2022-01-01DOI: 10.1097/PHH.0000000000001457
Mary T Bassett
{"title":"Tackling Structural Racism.","authors":"Mary T Bassett","doi":"10.1097/PHH.0000000000001457","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1097/PHH.0000000000001457","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":296123,"journal":{"name":"Journal of public health management and practice : JPHMP","volume":" ","pages":"S1-S2"},"PeriodicalIF":3.3,"publicationDate":"2022-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"39891783","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2022-01-01DOI: 10.1097/PHH.0000000000001329
Mallory Kennedy, Megan Heffernan, Shannon A Gonick, Alexa L Siegfried
Public health emergency preparedness is a critical health department function. The national public health accreditation program may enhance public health preparedness by building the capabilities and overall capacity of health departments and also by improving capabilities specific to preparedness. This study presents findings from a survey sent to health departments 1 year after achieving accreditation, with a focus on accreditation outcomes related to public health preparedness. Between April 2014 and February 2020, 214 health departments responded to the survey. Most respondents indicated that accreditation had positively influenced their health department's performance within each of the selected topic areas that may influence public health preparedness: workforce development; quality improvement efforts; use of evidence and data to drive decisions; and partnerships, accountability, and credibility among external stakeholders. Enhancing overall health department capacity through accreditation may support the ability of health departments to prepare for, respond to, and recover from public health emergencies.
{"title":"Exploring the Linkage Between Accreditation Outcomes and Public Health Emergency Preparedness and Response.","authors":"Mallory Kennedy, Megan Heffernan, Shannon A Gonick, Alexa L Siegfried","doi":"10.1097/PHH.0000000000001329","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1097/PHH.0000000000001329","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Public health emergency preparedness is a critical health department function. The national public health accreditation program may enhance public health preparedness by building the capabilities and overall capacity of health departments and also by improving capabilities specific to preparedness. This study presents findings from a survey sent to health departments 1 year after achieving accreditation, with a focus on accreditation outcomes related to public health preparedness. Between April 2014 and February 2020, 214 health departments responded to the survey. Most respondents indicated that accreditation had positively influenced their health department's performance within each of the selected topic areas that may influence public health preparedness: workforce development; quality improvement efforts; use of evidence and data to drive decisions; and partnerships, accountability, and credibility among external stakeholders. Enhancing overall health department capacity through accreditation may support the ability of health departments to prepare for, respond to, and recover from public health emergencies.</p>","PeriodicalId":296123,"journal":{"name":"Journal of public health management and practice : JPHMP","volume":" ","pages":"E80-E84"},"PeriodicalIF":3.3,"publicationDate":"2022-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"25496793","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2022-01-01DOI: 10.1097/PHH.0000000000001144
Victoria Brun, Elizabeth A Platz, Thuy Nguyen, Sara Valek, Donna Gugel, Karen Warmkessel, Norma F Kanarek
Purpose: Maryland historically had a high cancer burden, which prompted the implementation of aggressive cancer control strategies. We examined the status of cancer in Maryland and work under the current and previous editions of the MD Comprehensive Cancer Control Plan.
Methods: We examined the prevalence of cancer mortality, cancer incidence, and cancer-related behaviors in Maryland and the United States from 1985 to 2015 using publicly available data in the US Cancer Control PLANET, CDC WONDER, and Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System portals. We estimated the average annual cancer deaths avoided by triangulation.
Results: In 1983-1987, Maryland had the highest age-adjusted cancer mortality rate of all 50 states, second only to Washington, District of Columbia. Today (2011-2015), Maryland's age-adjusted cancer mortality rate ranks 31st. Overall cancer mortality rates have declined 1.9% annually from 1990 to 2015, avoiding nearly 60 000 deaths over 3 decades. While the prevalence of healthy cancer-related behaviors in Maryland was qualitatively similar or higher than that of the United States in 2015, Maryland's 5-year (2011-2015) cancer incidence rate was significantly greater than that of the United States.
Conclusions: Maryland's 30-year cancer mortality declines have outpaced other states. However, a reduction in mortality while incidence rates remain high indicates a need for enhanced focus on primary prevention.
{"title":"Progress in Cancer Control in Maryland: 1985-2015.","authors":"Victoria Brun, Elizabeth A Platz, Thuy Nguyen, Sara Valek, Donna Gugel, Karen Warmkessel, Norma F Kanarek","doi":"10.1097/PHH.0000000000001144","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1097/PHH.0000000000001144","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Maryland historically had a high cancer burden, which prompted the implementation of aggressive cancer control strategies. We examined the status of cancer in Maryland and work under the current and previous editions of the MD Comprehensive Cancer Control Plan.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We examined the prevalence of cancer mortality, cancer incidence, and cancer-related behaviors in Maryland and the United States from 1985 to 2015 using publicly available data in the US Cancer Control PLANET, CDC WONDER, and Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System portals. We estimated the average annual cancer deaths avoided by triangulation.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In 1983-1987, Maryland had the highest age-adjusted cancer mortality rate of all 50 states, second only to Washington, District of Columbia. Today (2011-2015), Maryland's age-adjusted cancer mortality rate ranks 31st. Overall cancer mortality rates have declined 1.9% annually from 1990 to 2015, avoiding nearly 60 000 deaths over 3 decades. While the prevalence of healthy cancer-related behaviors in Maryland was qualitatively similar or higher than that of the United States in 2015, Maryland's 5-year (2011-2015) cancer incidence rate was significantly greater than that of the United States.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Maryland's 30-year cancer mortality declines have outpaced other states. However, a reduction in mortality while incidence rates remain high indicates a need for enhanced focus on primary prevention.</p>","PeriodicalId":296123,"journal":{"name":"Journal of public health management and practice : JPHMP","volume":" ","pages":"E23-E32"},"PeriodicalIF":3.3,"publicationDate":"2022-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"38033203","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2022-01-01DOI: 10.1097/PHH.0000000000001439
Laura E Gómez
I write as an outsider to public health and allied fields, as a legal scholar of critical race theory, and as a sociologist of race and racism. My goals are 3-fold: (1) to situate so-called racial disparities in the broader context of the racial state and the federal census as a tool of race-making and racial subordination; (2) to highlight the specific context of anti-Latino racism as a distinct racial logic in the United States today; and (3) to apply that analysis to recent studies confirming the extent to which COVID-19 has disparately affected Latinos, African Americans, and Native Americans.
{"title":"Anti-Latino Racism, the Racial State, and Revising Approaches to \"Racial Disparities\".","authors":"Laura E Gómez","doi":"10.1097/PHH.0000000000001439","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1097/PHH.0000000000001439","url":null,"abstract":"I write as an outsider to public health and allied fields, as a legal scholar of critical race theory, and as a sociologist of race and racism. My goals are 3-fold: (1) to situate so-called racial disparities in the broader context of the racial state and the federal census as a tool of race-making and racial subordination; (2) to highlight the specific context of anti-Latino racism as a distinct racial logic in the United States today; and (3) to apply that analysis to recent studies confirming the extent to which COVID-19 has disparately affected Latinos, African Americans, and Native Americans.","PeriodicalId":296123,"journal":{"name":"Journal of public health management and practice : JPHMP","volume":" ","pages":"S9-S14"},"PeriodicalIF":3.3,"publicationDate":"2022-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"39891784","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2022-01-01DOI: 10.1097/PHH.0000000000001434
Dawn M Hunter, Zo Mpofu
Buncombe County, North Carolina, was recognized in 2014 as a Robert Wood Johnson Foundation Culture of Health Prize Winner for its work fostering collaboration and partnership to address community health needs. As part of this work, Buncombe County Health and Human Services (HHS) convened a cross-sector Public Health Advisory Council that supported community-based initiatives and ensured that community members were involved in identifying and implementing solutions to issues such as poverty and child well-being. Leveraging existing relationships and past efforts, Buncombe County has continued to build collaborative networks for systems change using a collective impact framework. Bringing together partners across sectors, including the faith community, Black fraternities and sororities, community health workers, consulates, and others, Buncombe County HHS is supporting efforts to train and equip community members to lead health promotion efforts and community conversations on historical trauma and racial healing; engage community members in the policymaking process through town halls; and archive the community's pandemic journey through storytelling. The collective impact framework has shaped an environment that supports community change by centering community aspirations and values. This environment informed recent declarations by Buncombe County HHS and the Board of Commissioners that racism is a public health crisis, as well as a resolution by the city of Asheville supporting community reparations. This article explores how the collective impact framework has been used in Buncombe County to engage and continually invest in communities of color and reviews steps taken to develop and implement an equity action plan to address structural racism.
{"title":"Leveraging Collective Impact to Address Structural Racism in Buncombe County, North Carolina.","authors":"Dawn M Hunter, Zo Mpofu","doi":"10.1097/PHH.0000000000001434","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1097/PHH.0000000000001434","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Buncombe County, North Carolina, was recognized in 2014 as a Robert Wood Johnson Foundation Culture of Health Prize Winner for its work fostering collaboration and partnership to address community health needs. As part of this work, Buncombe County Health and Human Services (HHS) convened a cross-sector Public Health Advisory Council that supported community-based initiatives and ensured that community members were involved in identifying and implementing solutions to issues such as poverty and child well-being. Leveraging existing relationships and past efforts, Buncombe County has continued to build collaborative networks for systems change using a collective impact framework. Bringing together partners across sectors, including the faith community, Black fraternities and sororities, community health workers, consulates, and others, Buncombe County HHS is supporting efforts to train and equip community members to lead health promotion efforts and community conversations on historical trauma and racial healing; engage community members in the policymaking process through town halls; and archive the community's pandemic journey through storytelling. The collective impact framework has shaped an environment that supports community change by centering community aspirations and values. This environment informed recent declarations by Buncombe County HHS and the Board of Commissioners that racism is a public health crisis, as well as a resolution by the city of Asheville supporting community reparations. This article explores how the collective impact framework has been used in Buncombe County to engage and continually invest in communities of color and reviews steps taken to develop and implement an equity action plan to address structural racism.</p>","PeriodicalId":296123,"journal":{"name":"Journal of public health management and practice : JPHMP","volume":" ","pages":"S38-S42"},"PeriodicalIF":3.3,"publicationDate":"2022-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"39891788","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2022-01-01DOI: 10.1097/PHH.0000000000001426
Carlene A Mayfield, Rachel Siegal, Melvin Herring, Tracie Campbell, Catie L Clark, Jennifer Langhinrichsen-Rohling
Context: Community violence is a public health problem that erodes social infrastructure. Structural racism contributes to the disparate concentration of violence in communities of color. In Mecklenburg County, North Carolina, increasing trends in community violence show racial and geographic disparities that emphasize the need for cross-sector, data-driven approaches to program and policy change. Cross-sector collaborations are challenged by data sharing barriers that hinder implementation.
Program: In response to community advocacy, Mecklenburg County Public Health (MCPH) launched a Community Violence Prevention Plan with evidence-based programming. The Cure Violence (CV) model, a public health approach to disrupting violence through equitable resource provision, network building, and changing norms, was implemented at the community level. The Health Alliance for Violence Intervention (HAVI) model, a hospital-based screening and case management intervention for victims of violence, was implemented at Carolinas Medical Center in Charlotte, the region's only level I trauma center.
Methods: A data collaborative was created to optimize evaluation of CV and HAVI programs including MCPH, the city of Charlotte, Atrium Health, Charlotte-Mecklenburg Schools, Johnson C. Smith University, and the University of North Carolina Charlotte. A comprehensive approach to facilitate data sharing was designed with a focus on engaging stakeholders and generating solutions to commonly reported barriers. Structured interviews were used to inform a solution-focused strategy.
Results: Stakeholders reported perceptions of their organization's barriers and facilitators to cross-sector data sharing. Common technology, legal, and governance barriers were addressed through partnership with a local integrated data system. Solutions for trust and motivational challenges were built into ongoing collaborative processes.
Discussion: Data silos inhibit the understanding of complex public health issues such as community violence, along with the design and evaluation of collective impact efforts. This approach can be replicated and scaled to support cross-sector collaborations seeking to influence social and health inequities stemming from structural racism.
背景:社区暴力是一个侵蚀社会基础设施的公共卫生问题。结构性种族主义导致了不同种族群体的暴力集中。在北卡罗来纳州的梅克伦堡县,社区暴力的上升趋势显示出种族和地域差异,强调需要跨部门、数据驱动的方法来进行项目和政策变革。数据共享障碍阻碍了跨部门合作的实施。方案:为响应社区倡导,梅克伦堡县公共卫生(MCPH)启动了一项以证据为基础的社区暴力预防计划。在社区一级实施了“治愈暴力”模式,这是一种通过公平提供资源、建立网络和改变规范来破坏暴力的公共卫生方法。暴力干预健康联盟(HAVI)模式是一种以医院为基础的暴力受害者筛查和个案管理干预,该模式在该地区唯一的一级创伤中心——夏洛特的卡罗来纳医疗中心实施。方法:建立数据协作机制,优化CV和HAVI项目的评估,包括MCPH、夏洛特市、Atrium Health、夏洛特-梅克伦堡学校、Johnson C. Smith大学和北卡罗来纳大学夏洛特分校。设计了一种促进数据共享的综合方法,重点是让利益攸关方参与进来,并针对普遍报告的障碍制定解决方案。结构化访谈被用来告知以解决方案为重点的策略。结果:利益相关者报告了他们组织对跨部门数据共享的障碍和促进因素的看法。通过与本地集成数据系统的合作,解决了共同的技术、法律和治理障碍。信任和动机挑战的解决方案被构建到正在进行的协作过程中。讨论:数据孤岛阻碍了对社区暴力等复杂公共卫生问题的理解,也阻碍了对集体影响努力的设计和评价。这种方法可以复制和扩大规模,以支持跨部门合作,力求影响结构性种族主义造成的社会和卫生不平等。
{"title":"A Replicable, Solution-Focused Approach to Cross-Sector Data Sharing for Evaluation of Community Violence Prevention Programming.","authors":"Carlene A Mayfield, Rachel Siegal, Melvin Herring, Tracie Campbell, Catie L Clark, Jennifer Langhinrichsen-Rohling","doi":"10.1097/PHH.0000000000001426","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1097/PHH.0000000000001426","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Context: </strong>Community violence is a public health problem that erodes social infrastructure. Structural racism contributes to the disparate concentration of violence in communities of color. In Mecklenburg County, North Carolina, increasing trends in community violence show racial and geographic disparities that emphasize the need for cross-sector, data-driven approaches to program and policy change. Cross-sector collaborations are challenged by data sharing barriers that hinder implementation.</p><p><strong>Program: </strong>In response to community advocacy, Mecklenburg County Public Health (MCPH) launched a Community Violence Prevention Plan with evidence-based programming. The Cure Violence (CV) model, a public health approach to disrupting violence through equitable resource provision, network building, and changing norms, was implemented at the community level. The Health Alliance for Violence Intervention (HAVI) model, a hospital-based screening and case management intervention for victims of violence, was implemented at Carolinas Medical Center in Charlotte, the region's only level I trauma center.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A data collaborative was created to optimize evaluation of CV and HAVI programs including MCPH, the city of Charlotte, Atrium Health, Charlotte-Mecklenburg Schools, Johnson C. Smith University, and the University of North Carolina Charlotte. A comprehensive approach to facilitate data sharing was designed with a focus on engaging stakeholders and generating solutions to commonly reported barriers. Structured interviews were used to inform a solution-focused strategy.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Stakeholders reported perceptions of their organization's barriers and facilitators to cross-sector data sharing. Common technology, legal, and governance barriers were addressed through partnership with a local integrated data system. Solutions for trust and motivational challenges were built into ongoing collaborative processes.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>Data silos inhibit the understanding of complex public health issues such as community violence, along with the design and evaluation of collective impact efforts. This approach can be replicated and scaled to support cross-sector collaborations seeking to influence social and health inequities stemming from structural racism.</p>","PeriodicalId":296123,"journal":{"name":"Journal of public health management and practice : JPHMP","volume":" ","pages":"S43-S53"},"PeriodicalIF":3.3,"publicationDate":"2022-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"39891789","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2022-01-01DOI: 10.1097/PHH.0000000000001461
Lloyd F Novick
{"title":"COVID-19: Addressing the Continuing Challenge.","authors":"Lloyd F Novick","doi":"10.1097/PHH.0000000000001461","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1097/PHH.0000000000001461","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":296123,"journal":{"name":"Journal of public health management and practice : JPHMP","volume":" ","pages":"1-2"},"PeriodicalIF":3.3,"publicationDate":"2022-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"39638731","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}