Hume Studies最新文献

英文中文

Structure and Feeling: A Unifying Reading of Hume’s Two Accounts of Pride 结构与情感:休谟《两种骄傲》的统一解读

4区哲学

Hume Studies

Pub Date : 2022-10-28 DOI: 10.1353/hms.2022.0013

Åsa Carlson

Abstract:Hume’s theory of pride has been dismissed due to the contingent relation between passion and object. But why did Hume state the theory as he did? Why did he give two accounts of pride, one holistic and one atomistic? This paper considers Hume’s reasons for giving two accounts, and how he unified them. The holistic account enables Hume to explain how moral distinctions are made, whereas the atomistic allows him to anchor morality in human nature. The accounts are unified by the distinction of feeling pride and being proud: a steady passion of pride would not count as that if it did not contain feelings of pride identified by their introspective quality, and would not be a state of pride without the causal relation of ideas.

摘要:休谟的骄傲理论因其激情与客体之间的偶然性关系而遭到否定。但休谟为什么要这样陈述他的理论呢?为什么他给出了两个关于骄傲的描述，一个是整体的，一个是原子的?本文探讨了休谟给出两种说法的原因，以及他是如何统一这两种说法的。整体理论使休谟能够解释道德差异是如何形成的，而原子论则使他能够将道德锚定在人性中。这些描述是由感觉骄傲和骄傲的区别统一起来的:如果一种稳定的骄傲激情不包含由内省品质确定的骄傲情感，那么它就不能算作骄傲，如果没有思想的因果关系，它就不是一种骄傲状态。

引用次数: 0

Hume. A Very Short Introduction by James A. Harris (review) 休谟。詹姆斯·A·哈里斯的《简短介绍》(书评)

4区哲学

Hume Studies

Pub Date : 2022-10-28 DOI: 10.1353/hms.2022.0018

Moritz Baumstark

引用次数: 0

Hume’s Third Thoughts on Personal Identity 休谟关于人格同一性的第三个思考

4区哲学

Hume Studies

Pub Date : 2022-10-28 DOI: 10.1353/hms.2022.0014

Tito Magri

Abstract:I suggest that Hume’s recantation, in the Appendix to the Treatise, of his account of the idea of personal identity in section 1.4.6 hinges on the contrast between the first-personal cognitive roles of that idea and its imagination-based explanation. In stark, if implicit, contrast with Locke, Hume’s account divorces personal identity from consciousness, considering oneself as oneself. But, later in the Appendix, Hume realized, if imperfectly, that something was missing from the idea of self he had constructed. I suggest that what is missing is the intimate consciousness of ourselves that idea should allow us to achieve. While Hume despaired to find a solution to this problem, a change in the background of his earlier theory—a change he had available and which is perhaps alluded to in a letter to Kames—could have made his original account consistent with the first-personal features of the idea of self.

摘要:我认为休谟在《人性论》附录中对1.4.6节中个人同一性概念的解释的改口，取决于该概念的第一人称认知角色与其基于想象的解释之间的对比。与洛克形成鲜明对比的是，休谟的描述将个人身份与意识分离开来，认为自己就是自己。但是，在附录的后面，休谟意识到，如果不完全的话，他所构建的自我概念中缺少了一些东西。我认为，我们缺少的是我们自己的亲密意识，而这种意识应该让我们实现。当休谟绝望地寻找这个问题的解决方案时，他早期理论背景的一个变化——一个他可以利用的变化，也许在给卡姆的一封信中暗示了——可能使他最初的描述与自我概念的第一人称特征相一致。

引用次数: 0

A Peculiar Mix: On the Place of Curiosity within Hume’s Treatise 奇特的混合:论休谟《人性论》中好奇心的地位

4区哲学

Hume Studies

Pub Date : 2022-10-28 DOI: 10.1353/hms.2022.0015

Gabriel Watts

Abstract:In this paper I argue that Hume’s decision to include an account of curiosity within his theory of the passions is what gives Book 2 of the Treatise its distinctive shape, in which an account of what Hume calls “indirect” passions precedes an account of the nature of the will, which is itself followed by an account of the “direct” passions, then curiosity. On my reading, Hume concludes his theory of the passions with an account of curiosity because this is where it ought to go, given how Hume understands the love of truth to arise in human nature. Not only this, but I contend that Hume’s need to account for the nature of curiosity within his theory of the passions can explain his decision to open Book 2 with a discussion of the indirect passions, rather than the direct passions.

摘要:在本文中，我认为休谟决定在他的激情理论中加入对好奇心的描述是《人性论》第二卷的独特形式，其中休谟所说的“间接”激情的描述先于对意志本质的描述，然后是对“直接”激情的描述，然后是对好奇心的描述。在我的阅读中，休谟用好奇心来总结他的激情理论，因为这是它应该去的地方，考虑到休谟如何理解人性中产生的对真理的热爱。不仅如此，我还认为休谟需要在他的激情理论中解释好奇心的本质，这可以解释他决定在第二卷中讨论间接的激情，而不是直接的激情。

引用次数: 0

Hume’s Transformation of Academic Skepticism 休谟对学术怀疑主义的转变

4区哲学

Hume Studies

Pub Date : 2022-10-28 DOI: 10.1353/hms.2022.0012

Aaron Alexander Zubia

Abstract:Hume described himself as an Academic skeptic and aligned himself with the skepticism of Socrates and Cicero. I argue, though, that Hume transformed the meaning of Academic skepticism by associating it with an experimental rather than dialectical method. In this essay, I distinguish between those aspects of Cicero’s Academic skepticism that Hume adopted and those he discarded in his presentation of mitigated skepticism in the first Enquiry. I then consider the implications of Hume’s transformation of Academic skepticism for Hume’s polite eloquence in the Essays, particularly the essays on happiness, which are often described as possessing “Ciceronian” and “dialectical” elements. Hume’s transformation of Academic skepticism is essential to helping readers understand not only Hume’s alleged neo-Hellenism, but also the aims of his philosophical project.

摘要：休谟把自己描述为一个学术怀疑论者，并赞同苏格拉底和西塞罗的怀疑论。然而，我认为，休谟通过将学术怀疑论与实验方法而非辩证方法联系起来，改变了学术怀疑论的含义。在这篇文章中，我区分了西塞罗学术怀疑论的那些方面，休谟采用了这些方面，而他在《第一次询问》中提出的减轻怀疑论则抛弃了这些方面。然后，我考虑了休谟学术怀疑论的转变对休谟在《随笔》中礼貌雄辩的影响，特别是关于幸福的随笔，这些随笔通常被描述为具有“西塞罗式”和“辩证”的元素。休谟对学术怀疑论的转变不仅有助于读者理解休谟所谓的新希腊主义，而且有助于理解他的哲学计划的目的。

引用次数: 0

Editors' Introduction 编辑的介绍

4区哲学

Hume Studies

Pub Date : 2022-10-28 DOI: 10.1353/hms.2022.0011

Elizabeth S. Radcliffe, Mark G. Spencer

In lieu of an abstract, here is a brief excerpt of the content:

Editors’ Introduction
Elizabeth S. Radcliffe and Mark G. Spencer

This issue of Hume Studies opens with the winner of the inaugural Hume Studies Essay Prize, Aaron Alexander Zubia’s excellent essay, “Hume’s Transformation of Academic Skepticism.” The Prize was awarded this past year in a competition among contending papers submitted from January 1 through August 1, 2021.

The Hume Studies Essay Prize is an annual award in the amount of $1,000 US made possible by the support of the Hume Society. The Essay Prize is an ongoing competition for those who submit papers to Hume Studies and are ten or fewer years from receiving the Ph.D., including current graduate students. Entries for the second prize closed on August 1, 2022. Papers submitted before that date are undergoing the usual refereeing process at the journal. The latest version of those papers in hand by December 31 will be passed to the Prize Selection Committee, a subset of the Hume Studies Editorial Board. The winner will be announced in early Spring 2023.

All papers submitted by qualifying authors from August 2, 2022, to August 1, 2023, will be considered entries in the third competition, to be awarded in 2024. See our website for more information: https://www.humesociety.org/ojs/index.php/hs/announcement.

We are happy to announce as well that, beginning with Hume Studies volume 47 (the current volume), we are employing a new printer, Christensen Printing (Joe Christensen, Inc.), in Lincoln, Nebraska. Paper issues should be arriving in mailboxes much more quickly than in the past. [End Page 169]

这期《休谟研究》以首届休谟研究论文奖得主亚伦·亚历山大·祖比亚的优秀论文《休谟对学术怀疑主义的转变》开篇。该奖项是去年在2021年1月1日至8月1日提交的论文中进行的竞赛。休谟研究论文奖是由休谟学会资助的年度奖金，奖金为1000美元。论文奖是一个持续的竞赛，为那些向休谟研究提交论文，并在10年或更短的时间内获得博士学位的人，包括目前的研究生。二等奖的报名截止日期为2022年8月1日。在此日期之前提交的论文将在期刊上进行常规的评审程序。这些论文的最新版本将在12月31日前提交给休谟研究编辑委员会下属的奖项评选委员会。获胜者将于2023年早春宣布。符合条件的作者在2022年8月2日至2023年8月1日期间提交的所有论文将被视为2024年第三届竞赛的参赛作品。更多信息请访问我们的网站:https://www.humesociety.org/ojs/index.php/hs/announcement。我们也很高兴地宣布，从休谟研究第47卷(当前卷)开始，我们将聘请一位新的印刷商，位于内布拉斯加州林肯市的克里斯滕森印刷公司(Joe Christensen, Inc.)。纸质问题应该比过去更快地到达邮箱。[End Page 169]版权所有©2022 Hume Studies…

{"title":"Editors' Introduction","authors":"Elizabeth S. Radcliffe, Mark G. Spencer","doi":"10.1353/hms.2022.0011","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1353/hms.2022.0011","url":null,"abstract":"In lieu of an abstract, here is a brief excerpt of the content:\u0000 <ul> <li> Editors’ Introduction </li> <li> Elizabeth S. Radcliffe and Mark G. Spencer </li> </ul> This issue of Hume Studies opens with the winner of the inaugural Hume Studies Essay Prize, Aaron Alexander Zubia’s excellent essay, “Hume’s Transformation of Academic Skepticism.” The Prize was awarded this past year in a competition among contending papers submitted from January 1 through August 1, 2021. The Hume Studies Essay Prize is an annual award in the amount of $1,000 US made possible by the support of the Hume Society. The Essay Prize is an ongoing competition for those who submit papers to Hume Studies and are ten or fewer years from receiving the Ph.D., including current graduate students. Entries for the second prize closed on August 1, 2022. Papers submitted before that date are undergoing the usual refereeing process at the journal. The latest version of those papers in hand by December 31 will be passed to the Prize Selection Committee, a subset of the Hume Studies Editorial Board. The winner will be announced in early Spring 2023. All papers submitted by qualifying authors from August 2, 2022, to August 1, 2023, will be considered entries in the third competition, to be awarded in 2024. See our website for more information: https://www.humesociety.org/ojs/index.php/hs/announcement. We are happy to announce as well that, beginning with Hume Studies volume 47 (the current volume), we are employing a new printer, Christensen Printing (Joe Christensen, Inc.), in Lincoln, Nebraska. Paper issues should be arriving in mailboxes much more quickly than in the past. [End Page 169] Copyright © 2022 Hume Studies ... ","PeriodicalId":29761,"journal":{"name":"Hume Studies","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2022-10-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"138527604","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"哲学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

The Great Guide: What David Hume can teach us about Being Human and Living Well by Julian Baggini (review) 《伟大的指南:大卫·休谟教给我们的做人和好好生活》朱利安·巴吉尼著(书评)

4区哲学

Hume Studies

Pub Date : 2022-10-28 DOI: 10.1353/hms.2022.0017

Lorraine L. Besser

引用次数: 0

Index to Volume 47 第47卷索引

4区哲学

Hume Studies

Pub Date : 2022-10-28 DOI: 10.1353/hms.2022.0020

In lieu of an abstract, here is a brief excerpt of the content:

Index to Volume 47

Articles

Bender, Sebastian. “Hume’s Deep Anti-Contractarianism.” 47.1: 103–129.

Carlson, Åsa. “Structure and Feeling: A Unifying Reading of Hume’s Two Accounts of Pride.” 47.2: 203–229.

Chamberlain, James. “Hume on Calm Passions, Moral Sentiments, and the ‘Common Point of View’.” 47.1: 79–101.

Clay, Graham. “Hume’s Incredible Demonstrations.” 47.1: 55–77.

Galvagni, Enrico. “Secret Sentiments: Hume on Pride, Decency, and Virtue.” 47.1: 131–155.

Grober, Max. “Hume and the Royal African.” 47.2: 285–310.

Magri, Tito. “Hume’s Third Thoughts on Personal Identity.” 47.2: 231–260.

Ooi, Daryl Ooi. “Hume’s Fragment on Evil.” 47.1: 39–53.

Qu, Hsueh. “Skepticism in Hume’s Dialogues.” 47.1: 9–38.

Watts, Gabriel. “A Peculiar Mix: On the Place of Curiosity within Hume’s Treatise.” 47.2: 261–284.

Zubia, Aaron Alexander. “Hume’s Transformation of Academic Skepticism.” 47.2: 171–202.

Book Reviews

Baggini, Julian. The Great Guide: What David Hume can teach us about Being Human and Living Well. Lorraine L. Besser. 47.2: 311–314.

Harris, James A. Hume. A Very Short Introduction. Moritz Baumstark. 47.2: 315–318.

Ribeiro, Brian. Sextus, Montaigne, Hume: Pyrrhonizers. Peter S. Fosl. 47.2: 319–324.

Schabas, Margaret, and Carl Wennerlind. A Philosopher’s Economist: Hume and the Rise of Capitalism. Erik W. Matson. 47:1: 161–166.

Skjönsberg, Max. The Persistence of Party: Ideas of Harmonious Discord in Eighteenth-Century Britain. Marc Hanvelt. 47.1: 157–160. [End Page 323]

代替摘要，这里是一个简短的内容摘录:索引到第47卷文章Bender, Sebastian。休谟的《深度反契约主义》。[47.1]: 103-129。卡尔森,亚撒。结构与情感:休谟《两种骄傲》的统一解读。47.2: 203-229。张伯伦,詹姆斯。休谟论冷静的激情、道德情操和“共同观点”。47.1: 79-101。粘土,格雷厄姆。《休谟不可思议的论证》。47.1: 55-77。Galvagni,恩里科。《隐秘的情感:休谟论骄傲、正派与美德》[47.1]: 131-155。grob,马克斯。休谟和皇家非洲人。47.2: 285-310。Magri,铁托。"休谟关于人格同一性的第三个思考"[47.2]: 231-260。哦，Daryl，哦。休谟的《恶论片段》47.1: 39-53。曲,松林。休谟对话录中的怀疑论。47.1: 9-38。加布里埃尔·瓦茨。《奇特的混合:论休谟《人性论》中好奇心的地位》[47.2]: 261-284。祖比亚，亚伦·亚历山大。休谟对学术怀疑主义的转变。47.2: 171-202。巴吉尼，朱利安。伟大的指南:大卫·休谟教我们如何做人，如何活得好。[j] .中华医学会杂志。47(2):311-314。詹姆斯·a·休谟。一个非常简短的介绍。莫里茨·鲍姆斯塔克，47.2:315-318。里贝罗,布莱恩。塞克斯图斯，蒙田，休谟:皮罗尼主义者。[j] .自然科学学报。47(2):319-324。Margaret Schabas和Carl wennerlin。哲学家的经济学家:休谟与资本主义的兴起。埃里克。W.马特森。47:1:161-166。Skjonsberg,马克斯。党的坚持:18世纪英国的和谐不和思想。马克·汉维尔特。47.1:157-160。[End Page 323]版权所有©2022 Hume Studies…

{"title":"Index to Volume 47","authors":"","doi":"10.1353/hms.2022.0020","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1353/hms.2022.0020","url":null,"abstract":"In lieu of an abstract, here is a brief excerpt of the content:\u0000 <ul> <li> Index to Volume 47 </li> </ul> <h2>Articles</h2> Bender, Sebastian. “Hume’s Deep Anti-Contractarianism.” 47.1: 103–129. Carlson, Åsa. “Structure and Feeling: A Unifying Reading of Hume’s Two Accounts of Pride.” 47.2: 203–229. Chamberlain, James. “Hume on Calm Passions, Moral Sentiments, and the ‘Common Point of View’.” 47.1: 79–101. Clay, Graham. “Hume’s Incredible Demonstrations.” 47.1: 55–77. Galvagni, Enrico. “Secret Sentiments: Hume on Pride, Decency, and Virtue.” 47.1: 131–155. Grober, Max. “Hume and the Royal African.” 47.2: 285–310. Magri, Tito. “Hume’s Third Thoughts on Personal Identity.” 47.2: 231–260. Ooi, Daryl Ooi. “Hume’s Fragment on Evil.” 47.1: 39–53. Qu, Hsueh. “Skepticism in Hume’s Dialogues.” 47.1: 9–38. Watts, Gabriel. “A Peculiar Mix: On the Place of Curiosity within Hume’s Treatise.” 47.2: 261–284. Zubia, Aaron Alexander. “Hume’s Transformation of Academic Skepticism.” 47.2: 171–202. <h2>Book Reviews</h2> Baggini, Julian. The Great Guide: What David Hume can teach us about Being Human and Living Well. Lorraine L. Besser. 47.2: 311–314. Harris, James A. Hume. A Very Short Introduction. Moritz Baumstark. 47.2: 315–318. Ribeiro, Brian. Sextus, Montaigne, Hume: Pyrrhonizers. Peter S. Fosl. 47.2: 319–324. Schabas, Margaret, and Carl Wennerlind. A Philosopher’s Economist: Hume and the Rise of Capitalism. Erik W. Matson. 47:1: 161–166. Skjönsberg, Max. The Persistence of Party: Ideas of Harmonious Discord in Eighteenth-Century Britain. Marc Hanvelt. 47.1: 157–160. [End Page 323] Copyright © 2022 Hume Studies ... ","PeriodicalId":29761,"journal":{"name":"Hume Studies","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2022-10-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"138527608","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"哲学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

Sextus, Montaigne, Hume: Pyrrhonizers by Brian Ribeiro (review) 塞克斯图斯、蒙田、休谟:pyrronizers作者:布莱恩·里贝罗(书评)

4区哲学

Hume Studies

Pub Date : 2022-10-28 DOI: 10.1353/hms.2022.0019

Peter S. Fosl

引用次数: 0

Hume's Incredible Demonstrations 休谟不可思议的论证

4区哲学

Hume Studies

Pub Date : 2022-06-08 DOI: 10.1353/hms.2022.0004

G. Clay

Abstract:Commentators have rightly focused on the reasons why Hume maintains that the conclusions of skeptical arguments cannot be believed, as well as on the role these arguments play in Hume's justification of his account of the mind. Nevertheless, Hume's interpreters should take more seriously the question of whether Hume holds that these arguments are demonstrations. Only if the arguments are demonstrations do they have the requisite status to prove Hume's point—and justify his confidence—about the nature of the mind's belief-generating faculties. In this paper, I treat Hume's argument against the primary/secondary quality distinction as my case study, and I argue that it is intended by Hume to be a demonstration of a special variety.

摘要：评论者们正确地关注了为什么休谟坚持怀疑论的结论是不可信的，以及这些论点在休谟为他对心灵的描述辩护中所起的作用。然而，休谟的阐释者应该更认真地对待这样一个问题，即休谟是否认为这些论点是论证。只有当这些论点是证明的时候，它们才有必要的地位来证明休谟的观点——并证明他的信心——关于心灵产生信仰的能力的本质。在本文中，我将休谟反对一级/二级质量区分的论点作为我的案例研究，我认为休谟的意图是证明一种特殊的多样性。

引用次数: 0

首页上一页

下一页尾页

类型

全部化学•材料生命科学医学物理工程技术环境•农林材料科学地球科学法学管理学化学环境科学与生态学计算机科学教育学经济学农林科学人文科学生物学数学物理与天体物理心理学综合性期刊其他工业工程理学历史学农学文学信息工程

数据库

全部 ACS Publications Elsevier ieeexplore Springer The Royal Society of Chemistry Wiley

期刊

Hume Studies

全部 Acc. Chem. Res. ACS Applied Bio Materials ACS Appl. Electron. Mater. ACS Appl. Energy Mater. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces ACS Appl. Nano Mater. ACS Appl. Polym. Mater. ACS BIOMATER-SCI ENG ACS Catal. ACS Cent. Sci. ACS Chem. Biol. ACS Chemical Health & Safety ACS Chem. Neurosci. ACS Comb. Sci. ACS Earth Space Chem. ACS Energy Lett. ACS Infect. Dis. ACS Macro Lett. ACS Mater. Lett. ACS Med. Chem. Lett. ACS Nano ACS Omega ACS Photonics ACS Sens. ACS Sustainable Chem. Eng. ACS Synth. Biol. Anal. Chem. BIOCHEMISTRY-US Bioconjugate Chem. BIOMACROMOLECULES Chem. Res. Toxicol. Chem. Rev. Chem. Mater. CRYST GROWTH DES ENERG FUEL Environ. Sci. Technol. Environ. Sci. Technol. Lett. Eur. J. Inorg. Chem. IND ENG CHEM RES Inorg. Chem. J. Agric. Food. Chem. J. Chem. Eng. Data J. Chem. Educ. J. Chem. Inf. Model. J. Chem. Theory Comput. J. Med. Chem. J. Nat. Prod. J PROTEOME RES J. Am. Chem. Soc. LANGMUIR MACROMOLECULES Mol. Pharmaceutics Nano Lett. Org. Lett. ORG PROCESS RES DEV ORGANOMETALLICS J. Org. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. A J. Phys. Chem. B J. Phys. Chem. C J. Phys. Chem. Lett. Analyst Anal. Methods Biomater. Sci. Catal. Sci. Technol. Chem. Commun. Chem. Soc. Rev. CHEM EDUC RES PRACT CRYSTENGCOMM Dalton Trans. Energy Environ. Sci. ENVIRON SCI-NANO ENVIRON SCI-PROC IMP ENVIRON SCI-WAT RES Faraday Discuss. Food Funct. Green Chem. Inorg. Chem. Front. Integr. Biol. J. Anal. At. Spectrom. J. Mater. Chem. A J. Mater. Chem. B J. Mater. Chem. C Lab Chip Mater. Chem. Front. Mater. Horiz. MEDCHEMCOMM Metallomics Mol. Biosyst. Mol. Syst. Des. Eng. Nanoscale Nanoscale Horiz. Nat. Prod. Rep. New J. Chem. Org. Biomol. Chem. Org. Chem. Front. PHOTOCH PHOTOBIO SCI PCCP Polym. Chem.

﹀