Pub Date : 2026-02-01Epub Date: 2025-12-11DOI: 10.1016/j.lana.2025.101323
Priscila de Morais Sato , Fernanda Lopes , Sonora English , Silvana Oliveira da Silva , James Berson Lalane , Thilagawathi Abi Deivanayagam , Rute Ramos da Silva Costa , Elizângela Baré , Indira Ramos Gomes , Delan Devakumar
We conducted a scoping review to examine how racism affects the health of minoritized populations in Brazil. A comprehensive search was carried out, and identified articles underwent independent double screening. The 145 included studies consistently highlighted structural health inequities, with White advantage functioning as a protective factor. Institutional racism restricts healthcare access and availability, exacerbating minoritized populations’ vulnerability to violence and disease through discrimination and substandard care. Spatial segregation further exposes minoritized populations to harmful environmental conditions and limited infrastructure, while traditional and migrant communities experience marginalization, social isolation, increased disease exposure, and poorer livelihoods. Interpersonal racism negatively impacts mental and physical health across the lifespan, with gender and socioeconomic conditions intersecting and shaping these experiences. The study provides critical insights for practice, policy, and research by demonstrating how racism at multiple levels shapes health inequities in Brazil and by emphasizing the need for human rights-centred, redistributive interventions that promote justice, equity, and inclusive care for minoritized populations.
Funding: This publication was funded by Edital 02/2025—PRPPG/UFBA (Scientific Publications Support Program) and by the CNPq Productivity in Research Scholarship (process number 306359/2024-3).
{"title":"Mapping the expressions and impacts of racism on health in Brazil: a scoping review","authors":"Priscila de Morais Sato , Fernanda Lopes , Sonora English , Silvana Oliveira da Silva , James Berson Lalane , Thilagawathi Abi Deivanayagam , Rute Ramos da Silva Costa , Elizângela Baré , Indira Ramos Gomes , Delan Devakumar","doi":"10.1016/j.lana.2025.101323","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.lana.2025.101323","url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>We conducted a scoping review to examine how racism affects the health of minoritized populations in Brazil. A comprehensive search was carried out, and identified articles underwent independent double screening. The 145 included studies consistently highlighted structural health inequities, with White advantage functioning as a protective factor. Institutional racism restricts healthcare access and availability, exacerbating minoritized populations’ vulnerability to violence and disease through discrimination and substandard care. Spatial segregation further exposes minoritized populations to harmful environmental conditions and limited infrastructure, while traditional and migrant communities experience marginalization, social isolation, increased disease exposure, and poorer livelihoods. Interpersonal racism negatively impacts mental and physical health across the lifespan, with gender and socioeconomic conditions intersecting and shaping these experiences. The study provides critical insights for practice, policy, and research by demonstrating how racism at multiple levels shapes health inequities in Brazil and by emphasizing the need for human rights-centred, redistributive interventions that promote justice, equity, and inclusive care for minoritized populations.</div><div>Funding: This publication was funded by Edital 02/2025—PRPPG/UFBA (<span>Scientific Publications Support Program</span>) and by the <span>CNPq Productivity in Research Scholarship</span> (process number 306359/2024-3).</div></div>","PeriodicalId":29783,"journal":{"name":"Lancet Regional Health-Americas","volume":"54 ","pages":"Article 101323"},"PeriodicalIF":7.0,"publicationDate":"2026-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145737867","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2026-02-01Epub Date: 2026-01-08DOI: 10.1016/j.lana.2025.101342
Richard L. Nahin , Termeh Feinberg , Hanna Grol-Prokopczyk , Flavia P. Kapos , Kerri Murray , Remle Scott , Anna Zajacova
Background
There are no contemporary studies simultaneously examining the incidence of multiple chronic diseases/conditions in US adults. We estimated one-year incidence rates for 12 chronic diseases/conditions with high public burden.
Methods
Data were from the nationally representative National Health Interview Survey 2019–2020 Longitudinal Cohort (N = 10,415). We assessed incidence rates for anxiety, arthritis, asthma, cancer, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), chronic pain, coronary heart disease (CHD), depression, diabetes, high cholesterol, hypertension, and obesity. We calculated overall and sex-specific age-standardized incidence rates per 1000 person-years (PY) and examined associations with baseline age, sex, race/ethnicity, education, insurance, and smoking status.
Findings
In the sample, 51.7% ([95% CI: 50.3–53.1]; N = 5624, representing 129.7 million adults) were female, 20.5% ([95% CI: 20–22.2]; N = 3405, representing 21.1 million adults) were aged 65+ years, 63.2% ([95% CI: 60.9–65.4]; N = 7495, representing 158.5 million adults) were Non-Hispanic White, 16.5% ([95% CI: 14.7–18.4]; N = 1153, representing 41.5 million adults) were Hispanic/Latino, 28.8% ([95% CI: 27.4–30.2]; N = 4228, representing 72.3 million adults) graduated college, and 72.4 ([95% CI: 70.8–73.9]; N = 7287, representing 167.0 million adults) had private health insurance. One-year incidence rates were lowest for diabetes, COPD and CHD: 13.8/1000 PY (95% CI: 10.8–16.8), 14.4/1000 PY (95% CI: 11.8–17.0), and 14.7/1000 PY (95% CI: 12.7–17.0), respectively. The highest rates were observed for high cholesterol and chronic pain, 85.7/1000 PY (95% CI: 79.4–91.9) and 85.3/1000 PY (95% CI: 78.7–92.0), respectively, while all other rates were between these extremes. Females had higher rates of anxiety (69.6 [95% CI: 60.5–75.7] vs 36.4 [95% CI: 29.8–43.1]) and depression (63.7 [95% CI: 55.1–72.3] vs 34.5 [95% CI: 28.4–40.7]), while males had higher rates of hypertension (77.3 [95% CI: 72.3–82.3] vs 56.5 [95% CI: 48.7–64.3]). Incidence-related risk factors differed across diseases/conditions, with age the most consistent predictor.
Interpretation
This comprehensive assessment documented striking variation in chronic disease/condition incidence. The findings provide essential evidence for prioritizing and coordinating prevention initiatives across the chronic disease/condition spectrum.
{"title":"Incidence rates of twelve chronic diseases/conditions in US adults: findings from a population-based study","authors":"Richard L. Nahin , Termeh Feinberg , Hanna Grol-Prokopczyk , Flavia P. Kapos , Kerri Murray , Remle Scott , Anna Zajacova","doi":"10.1016/j.lana.2025.101342","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.lana.2025.101342","url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>There are no contemporary studies simultaneously examining the incidence of multiple chronic diseases/conditions in US adults. We estimated one-year incidence rates for 12 chronic diseases/conditions with high public burden.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>Data were from the nationally representative National Health Interview Survey 2019–2020 Longitudinal Cohort (N = 10,415). We assessed incidence rates for anxiety, arthritis, asthma, cancer, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), chronic pain, coronary heart disease (CHD), depression, diabetes, high cholesterol, hypertension, and obesity. We calculated overall and sex-specific age-standardized incidence rates per 1000 person-years (PY) and examined associations with baseline age, sex, race/ethnicity, education, insurance, and smoking status.</div></div><div><h3>Findings</h3><div>In the sample, 51.7% ([95% CI: 50.3–53.1]; N = 5624, representing 129.7 million adults) were female, 20.5% ([95% CI: 20–22.2]; N = 3405, representing 21.1 million adults) were aged 65+ years, 63.2% ([95% CI: 60.9–65.4]; N = 7495, representing 158.5 million adults) were Non-Hispanic White, 16.5% ([95% CI: 14.7–18.4]; N = 1153, representing 41.5 million adults) were Hispanic/Latino, 28.8% ([95% CI: 27.4–30.2]; N = 4228, representing 72.3 million adults) graduated college, and 72.4 ([95% CI: 70.8–73.9]; N = 7287, representing 167.0 million adults) had private health insurance. One-year incidence rates were lowest for diabetes, COPD and CHD: 13.8/1000 PY (95% CI: 10.8–16.8), 14.4/1000 PY (95% CI: 11.8–17.0), and 14.7/1000 PY (95% CI: 12.7–17.0), respectively. The highest rates were observed for high cholesterol and chronic pain, 85.7/1000 PY (95% CI: 79.4–91.9) and 85.3/1000 PY (95% CI: 78.7–92.0), respectively, while all other rates were between these extremes. Females had higher rates of anxiety (69.6 [95% CI: 60.5–75.7] vs 36.4 [95% CI: 29.8–43.1]) and depression (63.7 [95% CI: 55.1–72.3] vs 34.5 [95% CI: 28.4–40.7]), while males had higher rates of hypertension (77.3 [95% CI: 72.3–82.3] vs 56.5 [95% CI: 48.7–64.3]). Incidence-related risk factors differed across diseases/conditions, with age the most consistent predictor.</div></div><div><h3>Interpretation</h3><div>This comprehensive assessment documented striking variation in chronic disease/condition incidence. The findings provide essential evidence for prioritizing and coordinating prevention initiatives across the chronic disease/condition spectrum.</div></div><div><h3>Funding</h3><div><span>US National Institutes of Health</span>.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":29783,"journal":{"name":"Lancet Regional Health-Americas","volume":"54 ","pages":"Article 101342"},"PeriodicalIF":7.0,"publicationDate":"2026-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145925435","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2026-02-01Epub Date: 2025-12-03DOI: 10.1016/j.lana.2025.101326
Carolina Santiago-Vieira , Leah Li , Rita de Cássia Ribeiro Silva , Juliana Freitas de Mello e Silva , Enny S. Paixão , Maurício L. Barreto , Gustavo Velasquez-Melendez
Background
Obesity is considered a disease with negative health impacts at all life stages. Changes in growth patterns, such as postnatal rapid weight gain (RWG), can be important predictors of growth trajectories in children. We investigated the association between RWG during the first two years of life and subsequent BMI trajectories from the age 3–to 9 years, and whether the association differed by birth weight group.
Methods
We used the data of a population-based cohort from the Cadastro Único (CadÚnico) of the Federal Government, the linkage of the National Live Births System (SINASC) and the National Food and Nutritional Surveillance System (SISVAN). The sample comprised 1.7 million Brazilian children aged from zero to nine years from 2008 to 2017. Mixed-effects models were used to estimate mean age-trajectories for BMI by RWG group.
Findings
Children who experienced RWG during the first two years of life had higher mean BMI trajectories from 3 to 9 years, compared to those who did not. The difference was seen across all birth weight groups, and was more evident for the children with high birth weight. At age 9, the BMI difference between RWG and non-RWG children was 1.31 kg/m2 (boys) and 1.43 kg/m2 (girls) for children with adequate birth weight, 1.27 kg/m2 (boys) and 1.35 kg/m2 (girls) for low birth weight, and 2.25 kg/m2 (boys) and 2.86 kg/m2 (girls) for macrosomia.
Interpretation
Children who experienced RWG during the first two years of life had higher BMI trajectories than children who did not. The finding highlighted the importance of monitoring child growth, which allows the early identification of potential growth deviations and the implementation of necessary interventions to ensure that children grow healthy and reach their full developmental potential.
Funding
Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior—CAPES, CAPES/Print/UFBA; University College London (UCL); National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) Great Ormond Street Hospital Biomedical Research Centre; Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de Minas Gerais—FAPEMIG; National Council for Scientific and Technological Development—CNPq; CNPq/CGFP/DECIT/SECTICS; Departamento de Ciência e Tecnologia da Secretaria de Ciência, Tecnologia, Inovação e Complexo da Saúde do Ministério da Saúde; Wellcome Trust.
{"title":"Rapid weight gain in first 2 years of life and BMI trajectories from 3 to <10 years: a population-based longitudinal study of 1.7 million Brazilian children","authors":"Carolina Santiago-Vieira , Leah Li , Rita de Cássia Ribeiro Silva , Juliana Freitas de Mello e Silva , Enny S. Paixão , Maurício L. Barreto , Gustavo Velasquez-Melendez","doi":"10.1016/j.lana.2025.101326","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.lana.2025.101326","url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Obesity is considered a disease with negative health impacts at all life stages. Changes in growth patterns, such as postnatal rapid weight gain (RWG), can be important predictors of growth trajectories in children. We investigated the association between RWG during the first two years of life and subsequent BMI trajectories from the age 3–to 9 years, and whether the association differed by birth weight group.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>We used the data of a population-based cohort from the Cadastro Único (CadÚnico) of the Federal Government, the linkage of the National Live Births System (SINASC) and the National Food and Nutritional Surveillance System (SISVAN). The sample comprised 1.7 million Brazilian children aged from zero to nine years from 2008 to 2017. Mixed-effects models were used to estimate mean age-trajectories for BMI by RWG group.</div></div><div><h3>Findings</h3><div>Children who experienced RWG during the first two years of life had higher mean BMI trajectories from 3 to 9 years, compared to those who did not. The difference was seen across all birth weight groups, and was more evident for the children with high birth weight. At age 9, the BMI difference between RWG and non-RWG children was 1.31 kg/m<sup>2</sup> (boys) and 1.43 kg/m<sup>2</sup> (girls) for children with adequate birth weight, 1.27 kg/m<sup>2</sup> (boys) and 1.35 kg/m<sup>2</sup> (girls) for low birth weight, and 2.25 kg/m<sup>2</sup> (boys) and 2.86 kg/m<sup>2</sup> (girls) for macrosomia.</div></div><div><h3>Interpretation</h3><div>Children who experienced RWG during the first two years of life had higher BMI trajectories than children who did not. The finding highlighted the importance of monitoring child growth, which allows the early identification of potential growth deviations and the implementation of necessary interventions to ensure that children grow healthy and reach their full developmental potential.</div></div><div><h3>Funding</h3><div>Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior—CAPES, CAPES/Print/UFBA; <span>University College London</span> (UCL); <span>National Institute for Health Research</span> (NIHR) <span>Great Ormond Street Hospital Biomedical Research Centre</span>; Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de Minas Gerais—FAPEMIG; <span>National Council for Scientific and Technological Development</span>—CNPq; CNPq/CGFP/DECIT/SECTICS; Departamento de Ciência e Tecnologia da Secretaria de Ciência, Tecnologia, Inovação e Complexo da Saúde do Ministério da Saúde; <span>Wellcome Trust</span>.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":29783,"journal":{"name":"Lancet Regional Health-Americas","volume":"54 ","pages":"Article 101326"},"PeriodicalIF":7.0,"publicationDate":"2026-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145683868","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2026-02-01Epub Date: 2025-12-27DOI: 10.1016/j.lana.2025.101350
Amos Grünebaum , Ruth Landau , Frank A. Chervenak
Background
The safety of out-of-hospital birth in the United States remains contested. A neglected methodological issue is the selective nonreporting of 5-min Apgar scores, which may conceal adverse outcomes and bias safety comparisons. This study examined whether Apgar score missingness differs systematically by birth setting and whether such “informative missingness” alters risk estimates.
Methods
We conducted a population-based analysis of 3,066,021 term, normal-birthweight, midwife-attended singleton births in the United States (2016–2023). Birth settings included hospitals, freestanding birth centers, and planned home births. Missing 5-min Apgar scores were quantified, and deterministic sensitivity analyses modeled the impact of varying assumptions about unrecorded low scores (<4 and <7). Hospital births served as the reference group.
Findings
Five-minute Apgar scores were missing in 0.13% of hospital, 1.9% of birth-center, and 3.1% of home births. Severe compromise (Apgar <4) occurred in 0.17%, 0.20%, and 0.26%, respectively. When half of missing scores were imputed as <4, adjusted odds of severe compromise increased to 7.7 for home and 4.9 for birth-center births vs. hospitals.
Interpretation
This study evaluates documentation integrity of US births. Selective nonreporting of 5-min Apgar scores at out-of-hospital births introduces major bias, distorting apparent safety of out-of-hospital births. Complete and enforceable outcome reporting is essential for scientific validity and ethically sound informed consent.
{"title":"Selective nonreporting of 5-min Apgar scores and its safety assessment of out-of-hospital births: a population-based study of United States’ birth data, 2016–2023 a population based study","authors":"Amos Grünebaum , Ruth Landau , Frank A. Chervenak","doi":"10.1016/j.lana.2025.101350","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.lana.2025.101350","url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>The safety of out-of-hospital birth in the United States remains contested. A neglected methodological issue is the selective nonreporting of 5-min Apgar scores, which may conceal adverse outcomes and bias safety comparisons. This study examined whether Apgar score missingness differs systematically by birth setting and whether such “informative missingness” alters risk estimates.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>We conducted a population-based analysis of 3,066,021 term, normal-birthweight, midwife-attended singleton births in the United States (2016–2023). Birth settings included hospitals, freestanding birth centers, and planned home births. Missing 5-min Apgar scores were quantified, and deterministic sensitivity analyses modeled the impact of varying assumptions about unrecorded low scores (<4 and <7). Hospital births served as the reference group.</div></div><div><h3>Findings</h3><div>Five-minute Apgar scores were missing in 0.13% of hospital, 1.9% of birth-center, and 3.1% of home births. Severe compromise (Apgar <4) occurred in 0.17%, 0.20%, and 0.26%, respectively. When half of missing scores were imputed as <4, adjusted odds of severe compromise increased to 7.7 for home and 4.9 for birth-center births vs. hospitals.</div></div><div><h3>Interpretation</h3><div>This study evaluates documentation integrity of US births. Selective nonreporting of 5-min Apgar scores at out-of-hospital births introduces major bias, distorting apparent safety of out-of-hospital births. Complete and enforceable outcome reporting is essential for scientific validity and ethically sound informed consent.</div></div><div><h3>Funding</h3><div>None declared.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":29783,"journal":{"name":"Lancet Regional Health-Americas","volume":"54 ","pages":"Article 101350"},"PeriodicalIF":7.0,"publicationDate":"2026-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145840622","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2026-02-01Epub Date: 2025-12-30DOI: 10.1016/j.lana.2025.101355
Garrett Keim , Paula Magee , Cody Gathers , Anireddy R. Reddy , Charlotte Z. Woods-Hill , Nadir Yehya
Background
Disparities in pediatric critical care outcomes are recognized, but national data describing Pediatric Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome (PARDS) prevalence, mortality and temporal trends are limited. We described prevalence, and regional and racial/ethnic mortality disparities for algorithm-defined ARDS, a surrogate for PARDS in US children from 2016 to 2022.
Methods
We performed a retrospective cohort study using the 2016, 2019, and 2022 Kids' Inpatient Database (KID). Algorithm-defined ARDS was identified with an ICD-10 approach requiring acute respiratory failure from pulmonary, sepsis, or shock etiologies requiring invasive mechanical ventilation ≥24 h. The primary outcome was in-hospital mortality. Exposures were US region and Race/Ethnicity, modeled individually and jointly. Mixed-effect logistic regression models, adjusting for income quartile, APR-DRG severity of illness, hospital type, and complex chronic conditions, estimated adjusted mortalities and risk differences.
Findings
Algorithm-defined ARDS occurred in about 42,000 hospitalizations per year, with prevalence increasing from 0.68% (95% CI 0.67–0.69) in 2016 to 0.75% (0.74–0.75) in 2022. Overall mortality was 12.9% (12.5–13.3) in 2016, 12.5% (12.1–12.9) in 2019, and 13.7% (13.3–14.1) in 2022. In the joint model, relative to Northeastern White children (predicted 10.9%, 95% CI 9.72–12.1), risks were higher for Black children in the South (predicted 14.2%, ARD 3.27%, 1.74–4.79) and West (14.6%, ARD 3.69%, 1.39–6.00); Hispanic children in the West (12.6%, ARD 1.70%, 0.09–3.31), and children of Other race/ethnicity in the South (16.5%, ARD 5.57%, 3.14–7.99) and West (14.0%, ARD 3.11%, 0.96–5.25). Disparities did not meaningfully change from 2016 to 2019, while mortality increased from 2019 to 2022.
Interpretation
Algorithm-defined ARDS among hospitalized US children remains common and highly fatal. Persistent regional and racial/ethnic disparities highlight systemic drivers of inequity and the need for targeted interventions.
Funding
This work was supported by the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute, National Institutes of Health (Award K23HL177271, PI: Keim).
背景:儿童重症监护结果的差异是公认的,但描述儿童急性呼吸窘迫综合征(PARDS)患病率、死亡率和时间趋势的国家数据是有限的。我们描述了2016年至2022年美国儿童中算法定义的ARDS (PARDS的替代方法)的患病率、地区和种族/民族死亡率差异。方法采用2016年、2019年和2022年儿童住院患者数据库(KID)进行回顾性队列研究。通过ICD-10方法确定算法定义的ARDS,要求肺部、败血症或休克病因引起的急性呼吸衰竭需要有创机械通气≥24小时。主要结局是院内死亡率。暴露是美国地区和种族/民族,单独和联合建模。混合效应logistic回归模型,调整了收入四分位数、疾病的APR-DRG严重程度、医院类型和复杂慢性病,估计了调整后的死亡率和风险差异。算法定义的ARDS发生在每年约42,000例住院患者中,患病率从2016年的0.68% (95% CI 0.67-0.69)增加到2022年的0.75%(0.74-0.75)。2016年总死亡率为12.9%(12.5-13.3),2019年为12.5%(12.1-12.9),2022年为13.7%(13.3-14.1)。在联合模型中,相对于东北部白人儿童(预测10.9%,95% CI 9.72-12.1),南部黑人儿童(预测14.2%,ARD 3.27%, 1.74-4.79)和西部黑人儿童(14.6%,ARD 3.69%, 1.39-6.00)的风险更高;西部的西班牙裔儿童(12.6%,ARD 1.70%, 0.09-3.31),南部(16.5%,ARD 5.57%, 3.14-7.99)和西部(14.0%,ARD 3.11%, 0.96-5.25)的其他种族/族裔儿童。从2016年到2019年,差距没有显著变化,而死亡率从2019年到2022年有所上升。解释算法定义的急性呼吸窘迫综合征在美国住院儿童中仍然很常见且高度致命。持续存在的区域和种族/族裔差异突出了不平等的系统性驱动因素和有针对性干预措施的必要性。本研究得到了美国国立卫生研究院国家心肺血液研究所的支持(编号:K23HL177271, PI: Keim)。
{"title":"Geographical and racial and/or ethnic disparities in pediatric ARDS mortality in the USA, 2016–2022: a triennial national database retrospective cohort analysis","authors":"Garrett Keim , Paula Magee , Cody Gathers , Anireddy R. Reddy , Charlotte Z. Woods-Hill , Nadir Yehya","doi":"10.1016/j.lana.2025.101355","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.lana.2025.101355","url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Disparities in pediatric critical care outcomes are recognized, but national data describing Pediatric Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome (PARDS) prevalence, mortality and temporal trends are limited. We described prevalence, and regional and racial/ethnic mortality disparities for algorithm-defined ARDS, a surrogate for PARDS in US children from 2016 to 2022.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>We performed a retrospective cohort study using the 2016, 2019, and 2022 Kids' Inpatient Database (KID). Algorithm-defined ARDS was identified with an ICD-10 approach requiring acute respiratory failure from pulmonary, sepsis, or shock etiologies requiring invasive mechanical ventilation ≥24 h. The primary outcome was in-hospital mortality. Exposures were US region and Race/Ethnicity, modeled individually and jointly. Mixed-effect logistic regression models, adjusting for income quartile, APR-DRG severity of illness, hospital type, and complex chronic conditions, estimated adjusted mortalities and risk differences.</div></div><div><h3>Findings</h3><div>Algorithm-defined ARDS occurred in about 42,000 hospitalizations per year, with prevalence increasing from 0.68% (95% CI 0.67–0.69) in 2016 to 0.75% (0.74–0.75) in 2022. Overall mortality was 12.9% (12.5–13.3) in 2016, 12.5% (12.1–12.9) in 2019, and 13.7% (13.3–14.1) in 2022. In the joint model, relative to Northeastern White children (predicted 10.9%, 95% CI 9.72–12.1), risks were higher for Black children in the South (predicted 14.2%, ARD 3.27%, 1.74–4.79) and West (14.6%, ARD 3.69%, 1.39–6.00); Hispanic children in the West (12.6%, ARD 1.70%, 0.09–3.31), and children of Other race/ethnicity in the South (16.5%, ARD 5.57%, 3.14–7.99) and West (14.0%, ARD 3.11%, 0.96–5.25). Disparities did not meaningfully change from 2016 to 2019, while mortality increased from 2019 to 2022.</div></div><div><h3>Interpretation</h3><div>Algorithm-defined ARDS among hospitalized US children remains common and highly fatal. Persistent regional and racial/ethnic disparities highlight systemic drivers of inequity and the need for targeted interventions.</div></div><div><h3>Funding</h3><div>This work was supported by the <span>National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute, National Institutes of Health</span> (Award K23HL177271, PI: Keim).</div></div>","PeriodicalId":29783,"journal":{"name":"Lancet Regional Health-Americas","volume":"54 ","pages":"Article 101355"},"PeriodicalIF":7.0,"publicationDate":"2026-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145884484","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2026-02-01Epub Date: 2025-12-12DOI: 10.1016/j.lana.2025.101335
Alya Govorchin , Maëve Leduc , Clifford G. Atleo , Dawn Hoogeveen , Irina Borgos , Lyana Patrick
The COVID-19 pandemic disproportionately impacted Indigenous Peoples in Canada, highlighting preexisting health inequities. These disparities were exacerbated by inadequate data management policies across Canadian governments, which contribute to inaccurate health information and access challenges for Indigenous Nations. Indigenous data sovereignty, which recognizes the right of Indigenous Peoples to govern their own data, has been identified as essential for achieving self-determination and improving health outcomes. We focus on British Columbia (BC) given its unique health and data governance structure with First Nations. This policy paper examines the challenges related to health data management that arose during COVID-19 in BC, and the regulatory barriers hindering Indigenous health equity. We present four policy recommendations that address data issues as a promising avenue to reducing health inequities in Canada. This includes supporting research by and with Indigenous Peoples, promoting ethical responsibilities of non-Indigenous researchers, implementing anti-racism policies, and adopting Indigenous data management frameworks.
{"title":"The right to health: indigenous data sovereignty in Canada during and beyond the COVID-19 pandemic","authors":"Alya Govorchin , Maëve Leduc , Clifford G. Atleo , Dawn Hoogeveen , Irina Borgos , Lyana Patrick","doi":"10.1016/j.lana.2025.101335","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.lana.2025.101335","url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>The COVID-19 pandemic disproportionately impacted Indigenous Peoples in Canada, highlighting preexisting health inequities. These disparities were exacerbated by inadequate data management policies across Canadian governments, which contribute to inaccurate health information and access challenges for Indigenous Nations. Indigenous data sovereignty, which recognizes the right of Indigenous Peoples to govern their own data, has been identified as essential for achieving self-determination and improving health outcomes. We focus on British Columbia (BC) given its unique health and data governance structure with First Nations. This policy paper examines the challenges related to health data management that arose during COVID-19 in BC, and the regulatory barriers hindering Indigenous health equity. We present four policy recommendations that address data issues as a promising avenue to reducing health inequities in Canada. This includes supporting research by and with Indigenous Peoples, promoting ethical responsibilities of non-Indigenous researchers, implementing anti-racism policies, and adopting Indigenous data management frameworks.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":29783,"journal":{"name":"Lancet Regional Health-Americas","volume":"54 ","pages":"Article 101335"},"PeriodicalIF":7.0,"publicationDate":"2026-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145737799","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2026-02-01Epub Date: 2025-12-02DOI: 10.1016/j.lana.2025.101327
Fabiani de Morais Batista , Paloma M. Carcamo , Elisabeth Nelson , Antonio Brandão da Silva Neto , Daniel Henrique Tsuha , Veruska Lahdo , Vagner Ricardo dos Santos , Gabriel Sylvestre Ribeiro , Renato da Silva Lopes , Pilar Amadeu , Marcos Vinicius Ferreira Mendes Blanco , Thiago Rodrigues da Costa , Karlos Diogo de Melo Chalegre , Thais Irene Souza Riback , Cátia Cabral da Silva , Otavio T. Ranzani , Derek A.T. Cummings , Jason R. Andrews , Albert I. Ko , Matt D.T. Hitchings , Julio Croda
Background
The introduction of the wMel strain of Wolbachia into Aedes aegypti mosquitoes significantly reduces dengue virus transmission. We evaluated the impact of large-scale releases of Wolbachia-infected Ae. aegypti on dengue incidence in Campo Grande, a large urban city in the Central-West region of Brazil, in the first deployment of Wolbachia as an official dengue-control strategy by the Brazilian federal government.
Methods
Mosquitoes infected with wMel Wolbachia were released in geographically phased deployments throughout Campo Grande from December 2020 through December 2023. An ovitrap surveillance network monitored Wolbachia prevalence in local Ae. aegypti populations during and after releases. Mixed-effects negative binomial regression was used to evaluate neighborhood-level monthly notified dengue incidence (2008–2024) as a function of monthly wMel exposure status, comparing fully treated (wMel prevalence stably ≥60%) and partially treated (ongoing releases or wMel <60%) with untreated periods, accounting for seasonal variation.
Findings
More than 100 million Wolbachia-infected mosquitoes were released, achieving a post-intervention mean Wolbachia prevalence of 86.4% (95% CI 84.0–88.9), with 89% of intervention areas reaching stable Wolbachia levels ≥60%. Stable establishment of wMel at ≥60% prevalence was associated with a 63.2% (95% CI 51.9–71.9) reduction in dengue incidence.
Interpretation
Our results demonstrate successful large-scale Wolbachia establishment in Ae. aegypti populations and a substantial epidemiological impact on dengue incidence in an urban Brazilian setting. This study provides robust evidence supporting Wolbachia deployment as an effective, sustainable public health intervention and validates its implementation as a federal government-supported dengue control strategy in Brazil.
Funding
This work was supported by the Brazilian Ministry of Health and the Oswaldo Cruz Foundation.
将沃尔巴克氏体wMel菌株引入埃及伊蚊可显著减少登革热病毒的传播。我们评估了大规模释放感染沃尔巴克氏体的伊蚊的影响。在巴西联邦政府首次将沃尔巴克氏体作为官方登革热控制战略部署时,在巴西中西部地区的大城市坎波格兰德(Campo Grande)对登革热发病率的埃及伊蚊进行了监测。方法于2020年12月至2023年12月在坎波格兰德按地理位置分阶段释放沃尔巴克氏体感染的蚊子。诱卵器监测网络监测了当地伊蚊沃尔巴克氏体的流行情况。释放期间和之后的埃及伊蚊种群。混合效应负二项回归用于评估社区水平每月报告登革热发病率(2008-2024)作为每月wMel暴露状态的函数,比较完全治疗(wMel患病率稳定≥60%)和部分治疗(持续释放或wMel <;60%)与未治疗期间,考虑到季节变化。结果释放了1亿多只感染沃尔巴克氏体的蚊子,干预后沃尔巴克氏体平均流行率为86.4% (95% CI为84.0 ~ 88.9),89%的干预地区沃尔巴克氏体稳定水平≥60%。wMel在≥60%患病率时的稳定建立与登革热发病率降低63.2% (95% CI 51.9-71.9)相关。我们的研究结果表明,在伊蚊中成功地建立了大规模沃尔巴克氏体。埃及伊蚊种群和对巴西城市登革热发病率的重大流行病学影响。本研究提供了强有力的证据,支持沃尔巴克氏体部署是一种有效、可持续的公共卫生干预措施,并验证了其作为巴西联邦政府支持的登革热控制战略的实施。这项工作得到了巴西卫生部和奥斯瓦尔多·克鲁兹基金会的支持。
{"title":"The impact of large-scale release of Wolbachia mosquitoes on dengue incidence in Campo Grande, Brazil: an ecological study","authors":"Fabiani de Morais Batista , Paloma M. Carcamo , Elisabeth Nelson , Antonio Brandão da Silva Neto , Daniel Henrique Tsuha , Veruska Lahdo , Vagner Ricardo dos Santos , Gabriel Sylvestre Ribeiro , Renato da Silva Lopes , Pilar Amadeu , Marcos Vinicius Ferreira Mendes Blanco , Thiago Rodrigues da Costa , Karlos Diogo de Melo Chalegre , Thais Irene Souza Riback , Cátia Cabral da Silva , Otavio T. Ranzani , Derek A.T. Cummings , Jason R. Andrews , Albert I. Ko , Matt D.T. Hitchings , Julio Croda","doi":"10.1016/j.lana.2025.101327","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.lana.2025.101327","url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>The introduction of the <em>w</em>Mel strain of <em>Wolbachia</em> into <em>Aedes aegypti</em> mosquitoes significantly reduces dengue virus transmission. We evaluated the impact of large-scale releases of <em>Wolbachia</em>-infected <em>Ae. aegypti</em> on dengue incidence in Campo Grande, a large urban city in the Central-West region of Brazil, in the first deployment of <em>Wolbachia</em> as an official dengue-control strategy by the Brazilian federal government.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>Mosquitoes infected with <em>w</em>Mel <em>Wolbachia</em> were released in geographically phased deployments throughout Campo Grande from December 2020 through December 2023. An ovitrap surveillance network monitored <em>Wolbachia</em> prevalence in local <em>Ae. aegypti</em> populations during and after releases. Mixed-effects negative binomial regression was used to evaluate neighborhood-level monthly notified dengue incidence (2008–2024) as a function of monthly <em>w</em>Mel exposure status, comparing fully treated (<em>w</em>Mel prevalence stably ≥60%) and partially treated (ongoing releases or <em>w</em>Mel <60%) with untreated periods, accounting for seasonal variation.</div></div><div><h3>Findings</h3><div>More than 100 million <em>Wolbachia</em>-infected mosquitoes were released, achieving a post-intervention mean <em>Wolbachia</em> prevalence of 86.4% (95% CI 84.0–88.9), with 89% of intervention areas reaching stable <em>Wolbachia</em> levels ≥60%. Stable establishment of <em>w</em>Mel at ≥60% prevalence was associated with a 63.2% (95% CI 51.9–71.9) reduction in dengue incidence.</div></div><div><h3>Interpretation</h3><div>Our results demonstrate successful large-scale <em>Wolbachia</em> establishment in <em>Ae. aegypti</em> populations and a substantial epidemiological impact on dengue incidence in an urban Brazilian setting. This study provides robust evidence supporting <em>Wolbachia</em> deployment as an effective, sustainable public health intervention and validates its implementation as a federal government-supported dengue control strategy in Brazil.</div></div><div><h3>Funding</h3><div>This work was supported by the <span>Brazilian Ministry of Health</span> and the <span>Oswaldo Cruz Foundation</span>.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":29783,"journal":{"name":"Lancet Regional Health-Americas","volume":"54 ","pages":"Article 101327"},"PeriodicalIF":7.0,"publicationDate":"2026-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145645849","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2026-02-01Epub Date: 2025-12-29DOI: 10.1016/j.lana.2025.101352
Caineng Cao , Teeradon Treechairusame , Amir H. Safavi , Yingzhi Wu , Zhigang Zhang , Achraf Shamseddine , Yao Yu , Nadeem Riaz , Daphna Y. Gelblum , Sean M. McBride , Alan L. Ho , Winston Wong , Lara A. Dunn , Loren Scott Michel , Eric J. Sherman , Nancy Y. Lee
Background
Intensity-modulated proton therapy (IMPT) is associated with fewer acute toxicities compared with intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) in definitive treatment of nonmetastatic nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC). Longer term efficacy and safety data are warranted to appraise the comparative benefit of IMPT for this population. The aim of this study was to evaluate the long-term toxicity and survival outcomes of NPC treated with IMPT vs IMRT at a tertiary academic cancer center during 2016–2022.
Methods
Sixty-seven (42.1%) cases treated by IMPT, and 92 (57.9%) controls treated by IMRT were included.
Findings
The median follow-up time was 55.4 months (interquartile range [IQR], 32.1–73.8 months). The incidence of any grade 2+ acute toxicity was lower with IMPT than IMRT (86.6% vs 97.8%, p = 0.009). Based on the logistic regression analysis, radiotherapy modality (IMRT vs IMPT) was significantly associated with developing any grade 2+ acute toxicity (odds ratio, 0.177; 95% confidence interval 0.035–0.886; p = 0.035). The incidence of grade 2+ late toxicity was not significantly different (p > 0.05) following IMPT (40.3%) and IMRT (52.7%). There were no statistically significant differences following IMRT and IMPT in 5-year cumulative incidence of local or regional failures [16.4% (9.1–25.6) vs 14.1% (6.5–24.7)], progression free survival and overall survival.
Interpretation
Although there were no statistically significant differences in incidence of late toxicities or oncologic outcomes, IMPT was associated with lower incidence of acute toxicity in comparison with IMRT.
Funding
This research was funded in part through the National Institutes of Health/National Cancer Institute Cancer Center Support Grant P30 CA008748.
背景:在非转移性鼻咽癌(NPC)的最终治疗中,与调强放疗(IMRT)相比,调强质子治疗(IMPT)的急性毒性更小。需要长期疗效和安全性数据来评估IMPT对这一人群的相对获益。本研究的目的是评估2016-2022年在三级学术癌症中心接受IMPT与IMRT治疗的鼻咽癌的长期毒性和生存结果。方法采用IMPT治疗67例(42.1%),对照组92例(57.9%)。中位随访时间为55.4个月(四分位数间距32.1-73.8个月)。IMPT组任何2+级急性毒性发生率均低于IMRT组(86.6% vs 97.8%, p = 0.009)。根据logistic回归分析,放疗方式(IMRT vs IMPT)与发生任何2+级急性毒性显著相关(优势比0.177;95%可信区间0.035 - 0.886;p = 0.035)。IMPT组(40.3%)和IMRT组(52.7%)2+级晚期毒性发生率无显著差异(p > 0.05)。IMRT和IMPT在5年累积局部或区域失败发生率[16.4% (9.1-25.6)vs 14.1%(6.5-24.7)]、无进展生存期和总生存期方面无统计学差异。尽管在晚期毒性发生率或肿瘤预后方面没有统计学上的显著差异,但与IMRT相比,IMPT的急性毒性发生率较低。本研究部分由美国国立卫生研究院/国家癌症研究所癌症中心支持基金P30 CA008748资助。
{"title":"Intensity-modulated proton therapy vs intensity-modulated radiotherapy in nasopharyngeal carcinoma: a case–control study","authors":"Caineng Cao , Teeradon Treechairusame , Amir H. Safavi , Yingzhi Wu , Zhigang Zhang , Achraf Shamseddine , Yao Yu , Nadeem Riaz , Daphna Y. Gelblum , Sean M. McBride , Alan L. Ho , Winston Wong , Lara A. Dunn , Loren Scott Michel , Eric J. Sherman , Nancy Y. Lee","doi":"10.1016/j.lana.2025.101352","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.lana.2025.101352","url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Intensity-modulated proton therapy (IMPT) is associated with fewer acute toxicities compared with intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) in definitive treatment of nonmetastatic nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC). Longer term efficacy and safety data are warranted to appraise the comparative benefit of IMPT for this population. The aim of this study was to evaluate the long-term toxicity and survival outcomes of NPC treated with IMPT vs IMRT at a tertiary academic cancer center during 2016–2022.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>Sixty-seven (42.1%) cases treated by IMPT, and 92 (57.9%) controls treated by IMRT were included.</div></div><div><h3>Findings</h3><div>The median follow-up time was 55.4 months (interquartile range [IQR], 32.1–73.8 months). The incidence of any grade 2+ acute toxicity was lower with IMPT than IMRT (86.6% vs 97.8%, p = 0.009). Based on the logistic regression analysis, radiotherapy modality (IMRT vs IMPT) was significantly associated with developing any grade 2+ acute toxicity (odds ratio, 0.177; 95% confidence interval 0.035–0.886; p = 0.035). The incidence of grade 2+ late toxicity was not significantly different (p > 0.05) following IMPT (40.3%) and IMRT (52.7%). There were no statistically significant differences following IMRT and IMPT in 5-year cumulative incidence of local or regional failures [16.4% (9.1–25.6) vs 14.1% (6.5–24.7)], progression free survival and overall survival.</div></div><div><h3>Interpretation</h3><div>Although there were no statistically significant differences in incidence of late toxicities or oncologic outcomes, IMPT was associated with lower incidence of acute toxicity in comparison with IMRT.</div></div><div><h3>Funding</h3><div>This research was funded in part through the <span>National Institutes of Health</span>/<span>National Cancer Institute Cancer Center</span> Support Grant <span><span>P30 CA008748</span></span>.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":29783,"journal":{"name":"Lancet Regional Health-Americas","volume":"54 ","pages":"Article 101352"},"PeriodicalIF":7.0,"publicationDate":"2026-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145884385","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}