首页 > 最新文献

Lancet Regional Health-Americas最新文献

英文 中文
Differential gastrointestinal mortality in Native Hawaiian/Pacific Islander and Asian subgroups in the U.S.: a cross-sectional analysis of national mortality surveillance data 2018–2023 美国夏威夷原住民/太平洋岛民和亚洲亚群胃肠道死亡率的差异:2018-2023年国家死亡率监测数据的横断面分析
IF 7 Q1 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES Pub Date : 2026-01-14 DOI: 10.1016/j.lana.2026.101372
Tiange P. Zhang , Jennifer L. Dodge , Norah A. Terrault , Brian P. Lee

Background

Asians and Native Hawaiians/Pacific Islanders (NHPIs) comprise 8% of the U.S. population with over 40 subgroups. Health data often aggregate these subpopulations, limiting group-specific estimates. In 2018, modifications to death certificates allowed for the disaggregation of NHPIs from Asians. This study examines differences in gastrointestinal-related mortality between NHPI and Asian adults across all major gastrointestinal disease categories.

Methods

We analyzed mortality data for adults aged ≥25 years from the National Center for Health Statistics 2018–2023. Established definitions classified NHPI and Asian individuals based on single or multi-race listings. Gastrointestinal-related deaths were identified using validated ICD-10 codes and categorized into liver diseases, colorectal cancer, upper gastrointestinal cancers, and non-cancer digestive diseases. Age-standardized mortality rates (ASMRs) per 100,000 and rate ratios were calculated.

Findings

Between 2018 and 2023, there were 3322 gastrointestinal-related deaths among NHPI adults (mean age 63.9 years, standard deviation 14.4; 1373 [41.3%] female decedents) and 47,275 among Asian adults (mean age 70.2 years, standard deviation 14.6; 20,892 [44.2%] female decedents). Overall gastrointestinal-related ASMR for NHPIs was 66.8 (95% CI: 64.5–69.2) per 100,000 adults. NHPIs exhibited higher mortality rates than Asians in all gastrointestinal disease categories. NHPIs had 24% higher overall gastrointestinal-related mortality rate than Asians (RR: 1.24; 95% CI: 1.20–1.29), with 33% higher for liver diseases (RR: 1.33; 95% CI: 1.24–1.44) and 63% higher for non-cancer digestive diseases (RR: 1.63; 95% CI: 1.49–1.77).

Interpretation

NHPIs (vs. Asians) have higher gastrointestinal-related mortality rates, with the greatest disparities observed in liver diseases and non-cancer digestive diseases. By disaggregating data across the full spectrum of gastrointestinal diseases, this study provides a clearer understanding of NHPI-specific disparities and highlights critical areas for targeted public health efforts.

Funding

U.S. National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases.
亚洲人和夏威夷原住民/太平洋岛民(nhpi)占美国人口的8%,有40多个亚群。卫生数据往往汇总了这些亚群,限制了特定群体的估计。2018年,对死亡证明的修改允许对来自亚洲的nhpi进行分类。本研究考察了NHPI和亚洲成年人在所有主要胃肠道疾病类别中胃肠道相关死亡率的差异。方法分析国家卫生统计中心2018-2023年年龄≥25岁成人的死亡率数据。已建立的定义根据单一或多种族列表对NHPI和亚洲个体进行分类。使用经过验证的ICD-10代码确定胃肠道相关死亡,并将其分类为肝病、结直肠癌、上胃肠道癌症和非癌症消化系统疾病。计算了每10万人的年龄标准化死亡率(ASMRs)及其比率。在2018年至2023年期间,NHPI成年人(平均年龄63.9岁,标准差14.4;女性死者1373例[41.3%])中有3322例胃肠道相关死亡,亚洲成年人(平均年龄70.2岁,标准差14.6;女性死者20,892例[44.2%])中有47,275例。nhpi患者的总体胃肠道相关ASMR为每10万成人66.8例(95% CI: 64.5-69.2)。在所有胃肠道疾病类别中,非裔美国人的死亡率都高于亚洲人。nhpi的胃肠道相关死亡率比亚洲人高24% (RR: 1.24; 95% CI: 1.20-1.29),肝脏疾病的死亡率比亚洲人高33% (RR: 1.33; 95% CI: 1.24 - 1.44),非癌症消化系统疾病的死亡率比亚洲人高63% (RR: 1.63; 95% CI: 1.49-1.77)。nhpi(与亚洲人相比)具有更高的胃肠道相关死亡率,在肝脏疾病和非癌症消化系统疾病中观察到的差异最大。通过分解胃肠道疾病全谱的数据,本研究提供了对nhpi特异性差异的更清晰理解,并突出了有针对性的公共卫生努力的关键领域。国家糖尿病、消化和肾脏疾病研究所。
{"title":"Differential gastrointestinal mortality in Native Hawaiian/Pacific Islander and Asian subgroups in the U.S.: a cross-sectional analysis of national mortality surveillance data 2018–2023","authors":"Tiange P. Zhang ,&nbsp;Jennifer L. Dodge ,&nbsp;Norah A. Terrault ,&nbsp;Brian P. Lee","doi":"10.1016/j.lana.2026.101372","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.lana.2026.101372","url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Asians and Native Hawaiians/Pacific Islanders (NHPIs) comprise 8% of the U.S. population with over 40 subgroups. Health data often aggregate these subpopulations, limiting group-specific estimates. In 2018, modifications to death certificates allowed for the disaggregation of NHPIs from Asians. This study examines differences in gastrointestinal-related mortality between NHPI and Asian adults across all major gastrointestinal disease categories.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>We analyzed mortality data for adults aged ≥25 years from the National Center for Health Statistics 2018–2023. Established definitions classified NHPI and Asian individuals based on single or multi-race listings. Gastrointestinal-related deaths were identified using validated ICD-10 codes and categorized into liver diseases, colorectal cancer, upper gastrointestinal cancers, and non-cancer digestive diseases. Age-standardized mortality rates (ASMRs) per 100,000 and rate ratios were calculated.</div></div><div><h3>Findings</h3><div>Between 2018 and 2023, there were 3322 gastrointestinal-related deaths among NHPI adults (mean age 63.9 years, standard deviation 14.4; 1373 [41.3%] female decedents) and 47,275 among Asian adults (mean age 70.2 years, standard deviation 14.6; 20,892 [44.2%] female decedents). Overall gastrointestinal-related ASMR for NHPIs was 66.8 (95% CI: 64.5–69.2) per 100,000 adults. NHPIs exhibited higher mortality rates than Asians in all gastrointestinal disease categories. NHPIs had 24% higher overall gastrointestinal-related mortality rate than Asians (RR: 1.24; 95% CI: 1.20–1.29), with 33% higher for liver diseases (RR: 1.33; 95% CI: 1.24–1.44) and 63% higher for non-cancer digestive diseases (RR: 1.63; 95% CI: 1.49–1.77).</div></div><div><h3>Interpretation</h3><div>NHPIs (vs. Asians) have higher gastrointestinal-related mortality rates, with the greatest disparities observed in liver diseases and non-cancer digestive diseases. By disaggregating data across the full spectrum of gastrointestinal diseases, this study provides a clearer understanding of NHPI-specific disparities and highlights critical areas for targeted public health efforts.</div></div><div><h3>Funding</h3><div><span>U.S. National Institute of Diabetes</span> and <span>Digestive and Kidney Diseases</span>.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":29783,"journal":{"name":"Lancet Regional Health-Americas","volume":"55 ","pages":"Article 101372"},"PeriodicalIF":7.0,"publicationDate":"2026-01-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145978366","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Physical restraint use in a United States intensive care unit—a retrospective cross sectional, single center cohort study from 2008 to 2022 美国重症监护病房的物理约束使用- 2008年至2022年的回顾性横断面单中心队列研究
IF 7 Q1 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES Pub Date : 2026-01-14 DOI: 10.1016/j.lana.2026.101374
Maximin Lange , Leo A. Celi , Ben Carter , Jesse D. Raffa , Sharon C. O'Donoghue , Marzyeh Ghassemi , Tom J. Pollard

Background

Physical restraints are widely used in intensive care units (ICUs) despite uncertain clinical benefit and risks. We aimed to characterise patterns of restraint use, demographic and clinical predictors, and temporal trends before and after introduction of federal restraint-related reporting requirements.

Methods

We conducted a retrospective cross-sectional study of 51,838 adults admitted to ICUs at Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, MA, USA, between 2008 and 2022, using data from the Medical Information Mart for Intensive Care IV (MIMIC-IV) electronic health record repository. Primary outcome was the proportion of ICU days with documented physical restraint use. Associations between restraint use and demographic and clinical factors were estimated using a binomial generalised linear model with a logit link. Propensity score matching compared Black and White patients under varying adjustment specifications.

Findings

Among 51,838 patients (mean age 63.8 years; 57% male), 21,091 (40.7%) experienced restraint. Use increased from 36.9% in 2008–10 to 44.0% in 2020–22 (p < 0.0001). Asian (aOR 0.84, 95% CI 0.79–0.89) and Hispanic/Latino patients (aOR 0.87, 95% CI 0.83–0.92) had lower odds of restraint than White patients. Propensity score matching between Black and White patients revealed ethnic patterns were highly sensitive to model specification: excluding demographic characteristics revealed significant disparities, which were attenuated when psychiatric diagnoses were also excluded. Matched White patients were not representative of all White ICU patients but rather a subset resembling Black patients on observed characteristics.

Interpretation

Restraint practices appear to vary with patient acuity, institutional factors, and communication barriers. The sensitivity of ethnic disparities to psychiatric diagnosis adjustment suggests these diagnoses may function as mediators rather than confounders, potentially reflecting systematic differences in clinical assessment along the causal pathway between ethnicity and restraint decisions. The non-representativeness of matched cohorts underscores that disparities depend on which patient subgroups are compared. Prospective multisite studies with standardized assessment protocols are needed to validate findings, disentangle true clinical variation from systematic bias and provide a more comprehensive understanding of restraint practices across US ICU settings.

Funding

No study-specific funding was received.
背景物理约束被广泛应用于重症监护病房(icu),尽管临床效益和风险不确定。我们的目的是描述约束使用模式、人口统计学和临床预测因素,以及引入联邦约束相关报告要求前后的时间趋势。方法我们对2008年至2022年期间在美国马萨诸塞州波士顿Beth Israel Deaconess医疗中心入住icu的51,838名成年人进行了回顾性横断面研究,使用重症监护医疗信息市场IV (MIMIC-IV)电子健康记录库的数据。主要终点是有记录的使用身体约束的ICU天数的比例。约束使用与人口统计学和临床因素之间的关联使用具有logit链接的二项广义线性模型进行估计。倾向评分匹配比较黑人和白人患者在不同的调整规范。在51,838例患者(平均年龄63.8岁,57%为男性)中,21,091例(40.7%)经历过约束。使用量从2008 - 2010年的36.9%增加到2020 - 2022年的44.0% (p < 0.0001)。亚洲患者(aOR 0.84, 95% CI 0.79-0.89)和西班牙裔/拉丁裔患者(aOR 0.87, 95% CI 0.83-0.92)约束的几率低于白人患者。黑人和白人患者的倾向评分匹配显示种族模式对模型规格高度敏感;排除人口统计学特征显示显著差异,当排除精神病学诊断时,这种差异减弱。匹配的白人患者并不代表所有白人ICU患者,而是在观察特征上与黑人患者相似的一个子集。约束实践似乎因患者的敏锐度、制度因素和沟通障碍而异。种族差异对精神病诊断调整的敏感性表明,这些诊断可能起到中介作用,而不是混杂因素,潜在地反映了沿着种族和约束决策之间因果路径的临床评估的系统差异。匹配队列的非代表性强调了差异取决于比较哪些患者亚组。需要采用标准化评估方案的前瞻性多地点研究来验证研究结果,从系统偏倚中理清真正的临床差异,并对美国ICU环境中的约束实践提供更全面的了解。没有收到研究专项资金。
{"title":"Physical restraint use in a United States intensive care unit—a retrospective cross sectional, single center cohort study from 2008 to 2022","authors":"Maximin Lange ,&nbsp;Leo A. Celi ,&nbsp;Ben Carter ,&nbsp;Jesse D. Raffa ,&nbsp;Sharon C. O'Donoghue ,&nbsp;Marzyeh Ghassemi ,&nbsp;Tom J. Pollard","doi":"10.1016/j.lana.2026.101374","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.lana.2026.101374","url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Physical restraints are widely used in intensive care units (ICUs) despite uncertain clinical benefit and risks. We aimed to characterise patterns of restraint use, demographic and clinical predictors, and temporal trends before and after introduction of federal restraint-related reporting requirements.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>We conducted a retrospective cross-sectional study of 51,838 adults admitted to ICUs at Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, MA, USA, between 2008 and 2022, using data from the Medical Information Mart for Intensive Care IV (MIMIC-IV) electronic health record repository. Primary outcome was the proportion of ICU days with documented physical restraint use. Associations between restraint use and demographic and clinical factors were estimated using a binomial generalised linear model with a logit link. Propensity score matching compared Black and White patients under varying adjustment specifications.</div></div><div><h3>Findings</h3><div>Among 51,838 patients (mean age 63.8 years; 57% male), 21,091 (40.7%) experienced restraint. Use increased from 36.9% in 2008–10 to 44.0% in 2020–22 (p &lt; 0.0001). Asian (aOR 0.84, 95% CI 0.79–0.89) and Hispanic/Latino patients (aOR 0.87, 95% CI 0.83–0.92) had lower odds of restraint than White patients. Propensity score matching between Black and White patients revealed ethnic patterns were highly sensitive to model specification: excluding demographic characteristics revealed significant disparities, which were attenuated when psychiatric diagnoses were also excluded. Matched White patients were not representative of all White ICU patients but rather a subset resembling Black patients on observed characteristics.</div></div><div><h3>Interpretation</h3><div>Restraint practices appear to vary with patient acuity, institutional factors, and communication barriers. The sensitivity of ethnic disparities to psychiatric diagnosis adjustment suggests these diagnoses may function as mediators rather than confounders, potentially reflecting systematic differences in clinical assessment along the causal pathway between ethnicity and restraint decisions. The non-representativeness of matched cohorts underscores that disparities depend on which patient subgroups are compared. Prospective multisite studies with standardized assessment protocols are needed to validate findings, disentangle true clinical variation from systematic bias and provide a more comprehensive understanding of restraint practices across US ICU settings.</div></div><div><h3>Funding</h3><div>No study-specific funding was received.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":29783,"journal":{"name":"Lancet Regional Health-Americas","volume":"55 ","pages":"Article 101374"},"PeriodicalIF":7.0,"publicationDate":"2026-01-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145978367","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Single-dose HPV vaccination in the United States — a multi-modeling analysis 美国单剂量HPV疫苗接种-多模型分析
IF 7 Q1 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES Pub Date : 2026-01-10 DOI: 10.1016/j.lana.2025.101361
Emily A. Burger , Jean-François Laprise , Jennifer C. Spencer , Stephen Sy , Mary Caroline Regan , Melanie Drolet , Éléonore Chamberland , Marc Brisson , Jane J. Kim

Background

Evidence supporting the non-inferior efficacy of single-dose human papillomavirus (HPV) vaccination has prompted reconsideration of existing multi-dose HPV vaccination schedules. We evaluated the long-term health impact of adopting single-dose HPV vaccination in the United States to inform policy deliberations.

Methods

We applied two validated individual-based simulation models of HPV transmission and cervical cancer to project the impact of switching from a two-dose to a single-dose HPV vaccination schedule in 2025 in the context of historical HPV vaccination uptake in the United States. Four scenarios were simulated: continuation of two-dose vaccination (or equivalent single-dose efficacy of 98%) and three alternative pessimistic single-dose strategies with lower vaccine efficacy (90%) and/or duration of protection (average of 25 years). Outcomes included age-standardized incidence rates of HPV-16 infection and cervical cancer from years 2005–2099. Additional analyses examined effects under lower vaccination coverage observed in select U.S. regions.

Findings

Maintaining two doses or switching to a non-inferior single-dose HPV vaccination schedule was projected to nearly eliminate HPV-16 infections and reduce cervical cancer incidence by over 90% by the end of the century. Scenarios assuming a lower efficacy or waning protection showed increases in cervical cancer incidence of less than 2 percentage points decades after a switch to single-dose vaccination with no impact on the timeframe to cervical cancer elimination.

Interpretation

Switching to a single-dose HPV vaccination schedule is projected to maintain reductions in cervical cancer, even under pessimistic efficacy and durability assumptions. Continued monitoring of single-dose HPV vaccine efficacy over time remains critical.

Funding

PATH on behalf of the Single-Dose HPV Vaccine Evaluation Consortium; Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation (grant No. OPP48979), and the US National Institutes of Health/National Cancer Institute (Grant Number U01 CA253912).
背景:支持单剂量人乳头瘤病毒(HPV)疫苗非劣效的证据促使人们重新考虑现有的多剂量HPV疫苗接种计划。我们评估了在美国采用单剂量HPV疫苗的长期健康影响,为政策审议提供信息。方法:我们应用了两个经过验证的基于个体的HPV传播和宫颈癌模拟模型,在美国历史HPV疫苗接种的背景下,预测2025年从双剂量到单剂量HPV疫苗接种计划转换的影响。模拟了四种情况:继续接种两剂疫苗(或等效的单剂效力为98%)和三种悲观的单剂策略,疫苗效力(90%)和/或保护持续时间(平均25年)较低。结果包括2005-2099年HPV-16感染和宫颈癌的年龄标准化发病率。其他分析考察了在美国某些地区观察到的较低疫苗接种覆盖率下的效果。研究结果预计,到本世纪末,维持两剂或改用非次等单剂HPV疫苗接种计划几乎可以消除HPV-16感染,并将宫颈癌发病率降低90%以上。假设效力较低或保护作用减弱的情况显示,在转向单剂量疫苗接种几十年后,宫颈癌发病率增加不到2个百分点,对消除宫颈癌的时间框架没有影响。转换到单剂量HPV疫苗接种计划预计将保持宫颈癌的减少,即使在悲观的疗效和持久性假设下。持续监测单剂HPV疫苗的长期效力仍然至关重要。代表单剂量HPV疫苗评估联盟资助适宜卫生技术研究项目;比尔及梅琳达·盖茨基金会OPP48979),以及美国国立卫生研究院/国家癌症研究所(资助号U01 CA253912)。
{"title":"Single-dose HPV vaccination in the United States — a multi-modeling analysis","authors":"Emily A. Burger ,&nbsp;Jean-François Laprise ,&nbsp;Jennifer C. Spencer ,&nbsp;Stephen Sy ,&nbsp;Mary Caroline Regan ,&nbsp;Melanie Drolet ,&nbsp;Éléonore Chamberland ,&nbsp;Marc Brisson ,&nbsp;Jane J. Kim","doi":"10.1016/j.lana.2025.101361","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.lana.2025.101361","url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Evidence supporting the non-inferior efficacy of single-dose human papillomavirus (HPV) vaccination has prompted reconsideration of existing multi-dose HPV vaccination schedules. We evaluated the long-term health impact of adopting single-dose HPV vaccination in the United States to inform policy deliberations.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>We applied two validated individual-based simulation models of HPV transmission and cervical cancer to project the impact of switching from a two-dose to a single-dose HPV vaccination schedule in 2025 in the context of historical HPV vaccination uptake in the United States. Four scenarios were simulated: continuation of two-dose vaccination (or equivalent single-dose efficacy of 98%) and three alternative pessimistic single-dose strategies with lower vaccine efficacy (90%) and/or duration of protection (average of 25 years). Outcomes included age-standardized incidence rates of HPV-16 infection and cervical cancer from years 2005–2099. Additional analyses examined effects under lower vaccination coverage observed in select U.S. regions.</div></div><div><h3>Findings</h3><div>Maintaining two doses or switching to a non-inferior single-dose HPV vaccination schedule was projected to nearly eliminate HPV-16 infections and reduce cervical cancer incidence by over 90% by the end of the century. Scenarios assuming a lower efficacy or waning protection showed increases in cervical cancer incidence of less than 2 percentage points decades after a switch to single-dose vaccination with no impact on the timeframe to cervical cancer elimination.</div></div><div><h3>Interpretation</h3><div>Switching to a single-dose HPV vaccination schedule is projected to maintain reductions in cervical cancer, even under pessimistic efficacy and durability assumptions. Continued monitoring of single-dose HPV vaccine efficacy over time remains critical.</div></div><div><h3>Funding</h3><div>PATH on behalf of the <span>Single-Dose HPV Vaccine Evaluation Consortium</span>; <span>Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation</span> (grant No. <span><span>OPP48979</span></span>), and the <span>US National Institutes of Health</span>/<span>National Cancer Institute</span> (Grant Number <span><span>U01 CA253912</span></span>).</div></div>","PeriodicalId":29783,"journal":{"name":"Lancet Regional Health-Americas","volume":"55 ","pages":"Article 101361"},"PeriodicalIF":7.0,"publicationDate":"2026-01-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145927697","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Authors’ reply to: Todd et al., prenatal and intrapartum antibiotic exposure and childhood infections: considerations and complexities 作者回复:Todd等人,产前和产时抗生素暴露与儿童感染:考虑因素和复杂性
IF 7 Q1 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES Pub Date : 2026-01-09 DOI: 10.1016/j.lana.2025.101369
Sarah A. Coggins , Sagori Mukhopadhyay
{"title":"Authors’ reply to: Todd et al., prenatal and intrapartum antibiotic exposure and childhood infections: considerations and complexities","authors":"Sarah A. Coggins ,&nbsp;Sagori Mukhopadhyay","doi":"10.1016/j.lana.2025.101369","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.lana.2025.101369","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":29783,"journal":{"name":"Lancet Regional Health-Americas","volume":"54 ","pages":"Article 101369"},"PeriodicalIF":7.0,"publicationDate":"2026-01-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145920762","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Mammography does not fit all: the screening controversy in Brazil 乳房x光检查并不适合所有人:巴西的筛查争议
IF 7 Q1 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES Pub Date : 2026-01-08 DOI: 10.1016/j.lana.2025.101367
José Bines , Fabiola Kestelman
{"title":"Mammography does not fit all: the screening controversy in Brazil","authors":"José Bines ,&nbsp;Fabiola Kestelman","doi":"10.1016/j.lana.2025.101367","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.lana.2025.101367","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":29783,"journal":{"name":"Lancet Regional Health-Americas","volume":"55 ","pages":"Article 101367"},"PeriodicalIF":7.0,"publicationDate":"2026-01-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145927695","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Incidence rates of twelve chronic diseases/conditions in US adults: findings from a population-based study 美国成年人12种慢性疾病/病症的发病率:一项基于人群的研究结果
IF 7 Q1 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES Pub Date : 2026-01-08 DOI: 10.1016/j.lana.2025.101342
Richard L. Nahin , Termeh Feinberg , Hanna Grol-Prokopczyk , Flavia P. Kapos , Kerri Murray , Remle Scott , Anna Zajacova

Background

There are no contemporary studies simultaneously examining the incidence of multiple chronic diseases/conditions in US adults. We estimated one-year incidence rates for 12 chronic diseases/conditions with high public burden.

Methods

Data were from the nationally representative National Health Interview Survey 2019–2020 Longitudinal Cohort (N = 10,415). We assessed incidence rates for anxiety, arthritis, asthma, cancer, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), chronic pain, coronary heart disease (CHD), depression, diabetes, high cholesterol, hypertension, and obesity. We calculated overall and sex-specific age-standardized incidence rates per 1000 person-years (PY) and examined associations with baseline age, sex, race/ethnicity, education, insurance, and smoking status.

Findings

In the sample, 51.7% ([95% CI: 50.3–53.1]; N = 5624, representing 129.7 million adults) were female, 20.5% ([95% CI: 20–22.2]; N = 3405, representing 21.1 million adults) were aged 65+ years, 63.2% ([95% CI: 60.9–65.4]; N = 7495, representing 158.5 million adults) were Non-Hispanic White, 16.5% ([95% CI: 14.7–18.4]; N = 1153, representing 41.5 million adults) were Hispanic/Latino, 28.8% ([95% CI: 27.4–30.2]; N = 4228, representing 72.3 million adults) graduated college, and 72.4 ([95% CI: 70.8–73.9]; N = 7287, representing 167.0 million adults) had private health insurance. One-year incidence rates were lowest for diabetes, COPD and CHD: 13.8/1000 PY (95% CI: 10.8–16.8), 14.4/1000 PY (95% CI: 11.8–17.0), and 14.7/1000 PY (95% CI: 12.7–17.0), respectively. The highest rates were observed for high cholesterol and chronic pain, 85.7/1000 PY (95% CI: 79.4–91.9) and 85.3/1000 PY (95% CI: 78.7–92.0), respectively, while all other rates were between these extremes. Females had higher rates of anxiety (69.6 [95% CI: 60.5–75.7] vs 36.4 [95% CI: 29.8–43.1]) and depression (63.7 [95% CI: 55.1–72.3] vs 34.5 [95% CI: 28.4–40.7]), while males had higher rates of hypertension (77.3 [95% CI: 72.3–82.3] vs 56.5 [95% CI: 48.7–64.3]). Incidence-related risk factors differed across diseases/conditions, with age the most consistent predictor.

Interpretation

This comprehensive assessment documented striking variation in chronic disease/condition incidence. The findings provide essential evidence for prioritizing and coordinating prevention initiatives across the chronic disease/condition spectrum.

Funding

US National Institutes of Health.
背景:目前还没有同时调查美国成人多种慢性疾病/病症发病率的研究。我们估计了12种公共负担高的慢性病/病症的一年发病率。方法数据来自具有全国代表性的《2019-2020年全国健康访谈调查》纵向队列(N = 10,415)。我们评估了焦虑、关节炎、哮喘、癌症、慢性阻塞性肺疾病(COPD)、慢性疼痛、冠心病(CHD)、抑郁、糖尿病、高胆固醇、高血压和肥胖的发病率。我们计算了每1000人年(PY)的总体和性别特异性年龄标准化发病率,并检查了与基线年龄、性别、种族/民族、教育程度、保险和吸烟状况的关系。在样本中,51.7% ([95% CI: 503 - 53.1]; N = 5624,代表1.297亿成年人)为女性,20.5% ([95% CI: 20-22.2]; N = 3405,代表2110万成年人)为65岁以上,63.2% ([95% CI: 60.9-65.4]; N = 7495,代表1.585亿成年人)为非西班牙裔白人,16.5% ([95% CI: 14.7-18.4]; N = 1153,代表4150万成年人)为西班牙裔/拉丁裔,28.8% ([95% CI: 27.4-30.2];N = 4228,代表7230万成年人)大学毕业,72.4 ([95% CI: 70.8-73.9]; N = 7287,代表1.67亿成年人)拥有私人医疗保险。糖尿病、慢性阻塞性肺病和冠心病的一年发病率最低:分别为13.8/1000 PY (95% CI: 10.8-16.8)、14.4/1000 PY (95% CI: 11.8-17.0)和14.7/1000 PY (95% CI: 12.7-17.0)。高胆固醇和慢性疼痛的发生率最高,分别为85.7/1000 PY (95% CI: 79.4-91.9)和85.3/1000 PY (95% CI: 78.7-92.0),而所有其他发生率介于这两个极端之间。女性有更高的焦虑率(69.6 [95% CI: 60.5-75.7] vs 36.4 [95% CI: 29.8-43.1])和抑郁症(63.7 [95% CI: 55.1-72.3] vs 34.5 [95% CI: 28.4-40.7]),而男性有更高的高血压率(77.3 [95% CI: 72.3-82.3] vs 56.5 [95% CI: 48.7-64.3])。与发病率相关的风险因素因疾病/病症而异,年龄是最一致的预测因素。这项综合评估记录了慢性疾病/病症发生率的显著差异。研究结果为确定慢性病/病症范围内预防措施的优先次序和协调提供了重要证据。资助美国国立卫生研究院。
{"title":"Incidence rates of twelve chronic diseases/conditions in US adults: findings from a population-based study","authors":"Richard L. Nahin ,&nbsp;Termeh Feinberg ,&nbsp;Hanna Grol-Prokopczyk ,&nbsp;Flavia P. Kapos ,&nbsp;Kerri Murray ,&nbsp;Remle Scott ,&nbsp;Anna Zajacova","doi":"10.1016/j.lana.2025.101342","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.lana.2025.101342","url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>There are no contemporary studies simultaneously examining the incidence of multiple chronic diseases/conditions in US adults. We estimated one-year incidence rates for 12 chronic diseases/conditions with high public burden.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>Data were from the nationally representative National Health Interview Survey 2019–2020 Longitudinal Cohort (N = 10,415). We assessed incidence rates for anxiety, arthritis, asthma, cancer, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), chronic pain, coronary heart disease (CHD), depression, diabetes, high cholesterol, hypertension, and obesity. We calculated overall and sex-specific age-standardized incidence rates per 1000 person-years (PY) and examined associations with baseline age, sex, race/ethnicity, education, insurance, and smoking status.</div></div><div><h3>Findings</h3><div>In the sample, 51.7% ([95% CI: 50.3–53.1]; N = 5624, representing 129.7 million adults) were female, 20.5% ([95% CI: 20–22.2]; N = 3405, representing 21.1 million adults) were aged 65+ years, 63.2% ([95% CI: 60.9–65.4]; N = 7495, representing 158.5 million adults) were Non-Hispanic White, 16.5% ([95% CI: 14.7–18.4]; N = 1153, representing 41.5 million adults) were Hispanic/Latino, 28.8% ([95% CI: 27.4–30.2]; N = 4228, representing 72.3 million adults) graduated college, and 72.4 ([95% CI: 70.8–73.9]; N = 7287, representing 167.0 million adults) had private health insurance. One-year incidence rates were lowest for diabetes, COPD and CHD: 13.8/1000 PY (95% CI: 10.8–16.8), 14.4/1000 PY (95% CI: 11.8–17.0), and 14.7/1000 PY (95% CI: 12.7–17.0), respectively. The highest rates were observed for high cholesterol and chronic pain, 85.7/1000 PY (95% CI: 79.4–91.9) and 85.3/1000 PY (95% CI: 78.7–92.0), respectively, while all other rates were between these extremes. Females had higher rates of anxiety (69.6 [95% CI: 60.5–75.7] vs 36.4 [95% CI: 29.8–43.1]) and depression (63.7 [95% CI: 55.1–72.3] vs 34.5 [95% CI: 28.4–40.7]), while males had higher rates of hypertension (77.3 [95% CI: 72.3–82.3] vs 56.5 [95% CI: 48.7–64.3]). Incidence-related risk factors differed across diseases/conditions, with age the most consistent predictor.</div></div><div><h3>Interpretation</h3><div>This comprehensive assessment documented striking variation in chronic disease/condition incidence. The findings provide essential evidence for prioritizing and coordinating prevention initiatives across the chronic disease/condition spectrum.</div></div><div><h3>Funding</h3><div><span>US National Institutes of Health</span>.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":29783,"journal":{"name":"Lancet Regional Health-Americas","volume":"54 ","pages":"Article 101342"},"PeriodicalIF":7.0,"publicationDate":"2026-01-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145925435","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Prenatal and intrapartum antibiotic exposure and childhood infections: considerations and complexities 产前和产时抗生素暴露和儿童感染:考虑和复杂性
IF 7 Q1 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES Pub Date : 2026-01-07 DOI: 10.1016/j.lana.2025.101368
Isobel M.F. Todd , David P. Burgner , Maria C. Magnus , Lars Henning Pedersen , Jessica E. Miller
{"title":"Prenatal and intrapartum antibiotic exposure and childhood infections: considerations and complexities","authors":"Isobel M.F. Todd ,&nbsp;David P. Burgner ,&nbsp;Maria C. Magnus ,&nbsp;Lars Henning Pedersen ,&nbsp;Jessica E. Miller","doi":"10.1016/j.lana.2025.101368","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.lana.2025.101368","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":29783,"journal":{"name":"Lancet Regional Health-Americas","volume":"54 ","pages":"Article 101368"},"PeriodicalIF":7.0,"publicationDate":"2026-01-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145925433","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Impact and scope of Mexican clinical practice guideline for adult overweight and obesity on weight stigma 墨西哥成人超重和肥胖临床实践指南对体重污名的影响和范围
IF 7 Q1 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES Pub Date : 2026-01-07 DOI: 10.1016/j.lana.2025.101366
Emma Chávez-Manzanera , Verónica Vázquez-Velázquez
{"title":"Impact and scope of Mexican clinical practice guideline for adult overweight and obesity on weight stigma","authors":"Emma Chávez-Manzanera ,&nbsp;Verónica Vázquez-Velázquez","doi":"10.1016/j.lana.2025.101366","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.lana.2025.101366","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":29783,"journal":{"name":"Lancet Regional Health-Americas","volume":"55 ","pages":"Article 101366"},"PeriodicalIF":7.0,"publicationDate":"2026-01-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145927694","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
An undeniable public health urgency, but an incomplete response: centering racial and ethnic equity in Canada's “Strategic approaches to reducing the substance use-related burden of disease” 不可否认的公共卫生紧迫性,但不完整的回应:将种族和族裔平等作为加拿大“减少药物使用相关疾病负担的战略方针”的中心
IF 7 Q1 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES Pub Date : 2026-01-07 DOI: 10.1016/j.lana.2025.101370
Jude Mary Cénat , Idrissa Beogo , Monnica Williams , Smita Pakhale
{"title":"An undeniable public health urgency, but an incomplete response: centering racial and ethnic equity in Canada's “Strategic approaches to reducing the substance use-related burden of disease”","authors":"Jude Mary Cénat ,&nbsp;Idrissa Beogo ,&nbsp;Monnica Williams ,&nbsp;Smita Pakhale","doi":"10.1016/j.lana.2025.101370","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.lana.2025.101370","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":29783,"journal":{"name":"Lancet Regional Health-Americas","volume":"55 ","pages":"Article 101370"},"PeriodicalIF":7.0,"publicationDate":"2026-01-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145927696","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
US emergency department visits by women due to assault (2018–2021): a retrospective cross-sectional analysis 2018-2021年美国女性因性侵就诊急诊:回顾性横断面分析
IF 7 Q1 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES Pub Date : 2026-01-06 DOI: 10.1016/j.lana.2025.101343
Summer Chavez , Irma Ugalde , Michael Ulrich , Omolola Adepoju , Tonghui Xu , Winston Liaw

Background

Domestic violence has played a key role in linking firearms and homicide amongst female individuals. Combined with the increase of reports of violence against women during the COVID-19 pandemic, a rise in emergency department (ED) visits may be witnessed. Our aim was to estimate the changes in prevalence and risk factors associated with assault and firearm-related emergency department (ED) visits by female patients following the COVID-19 pandemic.

Methods

We performed a retrospective cross-sectional study of female patients presenting to EDs due to assault from the National Emergency Department Sample (NEDS) from 2018 to 2021. Independent variables included age, race, mortality, ED disposition, primary payer, location, mean total ED chargers, quartile ZIP income, and mechanism and intent of injury. The adjusted association between independent variables and ED visits among patients injured by firearms compared to those injured by other assaults was examined.

Findings

The analytic sample represented an estimated 1,575,543 ED weighted records of female assault cases out of a total weighted sample of 537,133,200 observations (0.29%). While year-over-year ED encounters decreased, firearm injuries and the proportion of patients admitted and dying in the hospital increased. Female patients who were injured by firearms had 89 times higher risk of dying in the ED (RR = 88.82; 95% CI 6 = 72.38–97.06) compared to female patients injured by non-firearm injury mechanisms. Racial disparities were prevalent, with Native American women experiencing the greatest risk of being assaulted (RR = 2.81; 95% CI 2.67–2.97). Victims of firearm related assaults had nearly 4.12 times the risk of identifying as Black compared with those assaulted without firearms (95% CI 3.75–4.52). Female patients seeking care for assault had higher risk of being uninsured (95% CI 2.70–2.77).

Interpretation

While year-over-year ED encounters due to assault decreased, lockdowns and restrictions associated with the observed COVID-19 pandemic may not fully reflect changes in abuse rates in this time period. The strong connection between firearm presence and female homicide and continuations of assault and firearm-related ED visits among vulnerable demographic groups highlights the need for effective strategies to reduce violence.

Funding

Unfunded.
家庭暴力在将枪支与女性杀人联系起来方面发挥了关键作用。在2019冠状病毒病大流行期间,暴力侵害妇女行为的报告有所增加,因此急诊就诊人数可能会增加。我们的目的是估计2019冠状病毒病大流行后女性患者攻击和枪支相关急诊科(ED)就诊的患病率和风险因素的变化。方法:我们对2018年至2021年国家急诊科样本(NEDS)中因攻击而就诊的女性患者进行了回顾性横断面研究。独立变量包括年龄、种族、死亡率、急症处置、主要付款人、地点、平均急症总收费人、四分位数ZIP收入、机制和伤害意图。与其他袭击受伤的患者相比,受火器伤害的患者与急诊室就诊之间的调整后的自变量之间的关联进行了检查。分析样本代表了537,133,200个观察的总加权样本(0.29%)中约1,575,543个女性性侵案件的ED加权记录。虽然急诊病例逐年减少,但火器伤害以及住院和死亡的患者比例却有所增加。女性火器伤患者急诊死亡风险是非火器伤女性患者的89倍(RR = 88.82; 95% CI 6 = 72.38 ~ 97.06)。种族差异普遍存在,美洲原住民妇女遭受侵犯的风险最大(RR = 2.81; 95% CI 2.67-2.97)。与没有枪支的受害者相比,枪支相关袭击的受害者被认定为黑人的风险近4.12倍(95% CI 3.75-4.52)。因遭受袭击而寻求治疗的女性患者没有保险的风险更高(95% CI 2.70-2.77)。虽然因袭击而导致的急诊事件逐年减少,但与观察到的COVID-19大流行相关的封锁和限制可能无法完全反映这一时期虐待率的变化。在弱势群体中,枪支的存在与女性杀人、持续的攻击和与枪支有关的急诊科就诊之间存在着密切的联系,这突出表明需要制定有效的战略来减少暴力。
{"title":"US emergency department visits by women due to assault (2018–2021): a retrospective cross-sectional analysis","authors":"Summer Chavez ,&nbsp;Irma Ugalde ,&nbsp;Michael Ulrich ,&nbsp;Omolola Adepoju ,&nbsp;Tonghui Xu ,&nbsp;Winston Liaw","doi":"10.1016/j.lana.2025.101343","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.lana.2025.101343","url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Domestic violence has played a key role in linking firearms and homicide amongst female individuals. Combined with the increase of reports of violence against women during the COVID-19 pandemic, a rise in emergency department (ED) visits may be witnessed. Our aim was to estimate the changes in prevalence and risk factors associated with assault and firearm-related emergency department (ED) visits by female patients following the COVID-19 pandemic.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>We performed a retrospective cross-sectional study of female patients presenting to EDs due to assault from the National Emergency Department Sample (NEDS) from 2018 to 2021. Independent variables included age, race, mortality, ED disposition, primary payer, location, mean total ED chargers, quartile ZIP income, and mechanism and intent of injury. The adjusted association between independent variables and ED visits among patients injured by firearms compared to those injured by other assaults was examined.</div></div><div><h3>Findings</h3><div>The analytic sample represented an estimated 1,575,543 ED weighted records of female assault cases out of a total weighted sample of 537,133,200 observations (0.29%). While year-over-year ED encounters decreased, firearm injuries and the proportion of patients admitted and dying in the hospital increased. Female patients who were injured by firearms had 89 times higher risk of dying in the ED (RR = 88.82; 95% CI 6 = 72.38–97.06) compared to female patients injured by non-firearm injury mechanisms. Racial disparities were prevalent, with Native American women experiencing the greatest risk of being assaulted (RR = 2.81; 95% CI 2.67–2.97). Victims of firearm related assaults had nearly 4.12 times the risk of identifying as Black compared with those assaulted without firearms (95% CI 3.75–4.52). Female patients seeking care for assault had higher risk of being uninsured (95% CI 2.70–2.77).</div></div><div><h3>Interpretation</h3><div>While year-over-year ED encounters due to assault decreased, lockdowns and restrictions associated with the observed COVID-19 pandemic may not fully reflect changes in abuse rates in this time period. The strong connection between firearm presence and female homicide and continuations of assault and firearm-related ED visits among vulnerable demographic groups highlights the need for effective strategies to reduce violence.</div></div><div><h3>Funding</h3><div>Unfunded.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":29783,"journal":{"name":"Lancet Regional Health-Americas","volume":"54 ","pages":"Article 101343"},"PeriodicalIF":7.0,"publicationDate":"2026-01-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145925434","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
期刊
Lancet Regional Health-Americas
全部 Acc. Chem. Res. ACS Applied Bio Materials ACS Appl. Electron. Mater. ACS Appl. Energy Mater. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces ACS Appl. Nano Mater. ACS Appl. Polym. Mater. ACS BIOMATER-SCI ENG ACS Catal. ACS Cent. Sci. ACS Chem. Biol. ACS Chemical Health & Safety ACS Chem. Neurosci. ACS Comb. Sci. ACS Earth Space Chem. ACS Energy Lett. ACS Infect. Dis. ACS Macro Lett. ACS Mater. Lett. ACS Med. Chem. Lett. ACS Nano ACS Omega ACS Photonics ACS Sens. ACS Sustainable Chem. Eng. ACS Synth. Biol. Anal. Chem. BIOCHEMISTRY-US Bioconjugate Chem. BIOMACROMOLECULES Chem. Res. Toxicol. Chem. Rev. Chem. Mater. CRYST GROWTH DES ENERG FUEL Environ. Sci. Technol. Environ. Sci. Technol. Lett. Eur. J. Inorg. Chem. IND ENG CHEM RES Inorg. Chem. J. Agric. Food. Chem. J. Chem. Eng. Data J. Chem. Educ. J. Chem. Inf. Model. J. Chem. Theory Comput. J. Med. Chem. J. Nat. Prod. J PROTEOME RES J. Am. Chem. Soc. LANGMUIR MACROMOLECULES Mol. Pharmaceutics Nano Lett. Org. Lett. ORG PROCESS RES DEV ORGANOMETALLICS J. Org. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. A J. Phys. Chem. B J. Phys. Chem. C J. Phys. Chem. Lett. Analyst Anal. Methods Biomater. Sci. Catal. Sci. Technol. Chem. Commun. Chem. Soc. Rev. CHEM EDUC RES PRACT CRYSTENGCOMM Dalton Trans. Energy Environ. Sci. ENVIRON SCI-NANO ENVIRON SCI-PROC IMP ENVIRON SCI-WAT RES Faraday Discuss. Food Funct. Green Chem. Inorg. Chem. Front. Integr. Biol. J. Anal. At. Spectrom. J. Mater. Chem. A J. Mater. Chem. B J. Mater. Chem. C Lab Chip Mater. Chem. Front. Mater. Horiz. MEDCHEMCOMM Metallomics Mol. Biosyst. Mol. Syst. Des. Eng. Nanoscale Nanoscale Horiz. Nat. Prod. Rep. New J. Chem. Org. Biomol. Chem. Org. Chem. Front. PHOTOCH PHOTOBIO SCI PCCP Polym. Chem.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1