首页 > 最新文献

Lancet Regional Health-Americas最新文献

英文 中文
The prevalence of cannabis use pre-versus post-cannabis legalization in Canada by mental health status: findings from national repeat cross-sectional surveys 按心理健康状况分列的加拿大大麻合法化前后大麻使用的流行程度:全国重复横断面调查的结果
IF 7 Q1 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES Pub Date : 2026-03-01 Epub Date: 2026-01-19 DOI: 10.1016/j.lana.2026.101373
Samantha Rundle , Maryam Iraniparast , David Hammond

Background

The bidirectional relationship between cannabis use and mental health is complex. With the liberalization of cannabis laws in many countries, it is increasingly important to understand the impacts of cannabis legalization on individuals with mental health conditions. This study aimed to examine changes in cannabis use by mental health status pre-versus 5-years post-legalization of recreational cannabis in Canada.

Methods

Data were from the International Cannabis Policy Study's national repeat cross-sectional surveys, conducted annually in Canada between 2018 and 2023, one year before and five years after the legalization of cannabis. The current analysis includes 92,843 Canadians aged 16–65 years. Adjusted logistic regression models examined changes in daily and past 12-month cannabis use pre-versus post-legalization among individuals experiencing each of the five mental health problems in the last year: anxiety, bipolar, depression, post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD), and schizophrenia.

Findings

Past 12-month cannabis consumption increased from pre-legalization versus the year immediately following legalization (2019) among those with anxiety (adjusted odds ratio (AOR) = 1.33, 95% CI = 1.15, 1.53, p < 0.0001), depression (AOR = 1.47, 95% CI = 1.26, 1.73, p < 0.0001), and those reporting ‘no experience’ of a mental health problem in the past year (AOR = 1.52, 95% CI = 1.37, 1.68, p < 0.0001). Past 12-month cannabis use remained significantly higher in 2023 versus pre-legalization for anxiety and depression. Daily cannabis use increased from 2018 to 2019 only among those not reporting any experience of a mental health problem in the past year (AOR = 1.34, 95% CI = 1.10, 1.62, p < 0.0001). No other pre-post legalization differences were observed among individuals who experienced bipolar, PTSD, or schizophrenia.

Interpretation

Few changes in cannabis use were observed pre-versus post-cannabis legalization among Canadians who reported experiencing a mental health problem, whereas daily and past 12-month use increased among Canadians not reporting a mental health problem.

Funding

Funding for the ICPS study was provided by a Canadian Institutes of Health Research Project Grant and Project Bridge Grant (PJT-153342).
大麻使用与心理健康之间的双向关系是复杂的。随着许多国家大麻法律的放宽,了解大麻合法化对有精神健康问题的个人的影响变得越来越重要。本研究旨在研究加拿大娱乐性大麻合法化前与5年后大麻使用心理健康状况的变化。方法数据来自国际大麻政策研究的全国重复横断面调查,该调查于2018年至2023年在加拿大进行,分别是大麻合法化的前一年和后五年。目前的分析包括92,843名年龄在16-65岁之间的加拿大人。调整后的逻辑回归模型检查了去年经历五种精神健康问题(焦虑、双相情感障碍、抑郁、创伤后应激障碍和精神分裂症)的个体在大麻合法化前和合法化后每天和过去12个月大麻使用情况的变化。研究发现,与合法化后的一年(2019年)相比,过去12个月的大麻消费量在焦虑(调整优势比(AOR) = 1.33, 95% CI = 1.15, 1.53, p < 0.0001)、抑郁(AOR = 1.47, 95% CI = 1.26, 1.73, p < 0.0001)和报告在过去一年中“没有经历”精神健康问题的人(AOR = 1.52, 95% CI = 1.37, 1.68, p < 0.0001)中有所增加。与合法化前相比,2023年过去12个月的大麻使用量仍明显高于焦虑和抑郁。从2018年到2019年,只有在过去一年没有任何精神健康问题经历的人群中,每日大麻使用量有所增加(AOR = 1.34, 95% CI = 1.10, 1.62, p < 0.0001)。在经历过双相情感障碍、创伤后应激障碍或精神分裂症的个体中,没有观察到其他的合法化前后差异。解释在报告有精神健康问题的加拿大人中,大麻使用在大麻合法化之前和之后几乎没有变化,而在报告没有精神健康问题的加拿大人中,每天和过去12个月的大麻使用有所增加。ICPS研究的资金由加拿大卫生研究院项目资助和项目桥梁资助(PJT-153342)提供。
{"title":"The prevalence of cannabis use pre-versus post-cannabis legalization in Canada by mental health status: findings from national repeat cross-sectional surveys","authors":"Samantha Rundle ,&nbsp;Maryam Iraniparast ,&nbsp;David Hammond","doi":"10.1016/j.lana.2026.101373","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.lana.2026.101373","url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>The bidirectional relationship between cannabis use and mental health is complex. With the liberalization of cannabis laws in many countries, it is increasingly important to understand the impacts of cannabis legalization on individuals with mental health conditions. This study aimed to examine changes in cannabis use by mental health status pre-versus 5-years post-legalization of recreational cannabis in Canada.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>Data were from the International Cannabis Policy Study's national repeat cross-sectional surveys, conducted annually in Canada between 2018 and 2023, one year before and five years after the legalization of cannabis. The current analysis includes 92,843 Canadians aged 16–65 years. Adjusted logistic regression models examined changes in daily and past 12-month cannabis use pre-versus post-legalization among individuals experiencing each of the five mental health problems in the last year: anxiety, bipolar, depression, post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD), and schizophrenia.</div></div><div><h3>Findings</h3><div>Past 12-month cannabis consumption increased from pre-legalization versus the year immediately following legalization (2019) among those with anxiety (adjusted odds ratio (AOR) = 1.33, 95% CI = 1.15, 1.53, <em>p</em> &lt; 0.0001), depression (AOR = 1.47, 95% CI = 1.26, 1.73, <em>p</em> &lt; 0.0001), and those reporting ‘no experience’ of a mental health problem in the past year (AOR = 1.52, 95% CI = 1.37, 1.68, <em>p</em> &lt; 0.0001). Past 12-month cannabis use remained significantly higher in 2023 versus pre-legalization for anxiety and depression. Daily cannabis use increased from 2018 to 2019 only among those not reporting any experience of a mental health problem in the past year (AOR = 1.34, 95% CI = 1.10, 1.62, <em>p</em> &lt; 0.0001). No other pre-post legalization differences were observed among individuals who experienced bipolar, PTSD, or schizophrenia.</div></div><div><h3>Interpretation</h3><div>Few changes in cannabis use were observed pre-versus post-cannabis legalization among Canadians who reported experiencing a mental health problem, whereas daily and past 12-month use increased among Canadians not reporting a mental health problem.</div></div><div><h3>Funding</h3><div>Funding for the ICPS study was provided by a <span>Canadian Institutes of Health Research Project Grant and Project Bridge Grant</span> (PJT-153342).</div></div>","PeriodicalId":29783,"journal":{"name":"Lancet Regional Health-Americas","volume":"55 ","pages":"Article 101373"},"PeriodicalIF":7.0,"publicationDate":"2026-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"146037678","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
‘Strategic approaches to reducing the substance use-related burden of disease in Canada’ — authors' reply “减少加拿大药物使用相关疾病负担的战略方法”——作者回复
IF 7 Q1 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES Pub Date : 2026-03-01 Epub Date: 2026-01-29 DOI: 10.1016/j.lana.2026.101376
Benedikt Fischer , Wayne Hall , Bernard Le Foll , Patricia Conrod
{"title":"‘Strategic approaches to reducing the substance use-related burden of disease in Canada’ — authors' reply","authors":"Benedikt Fischer ,&nbsp;Wayne Hall ,&nbsp;Bernard Le Foll ,&nbsp;Patricia Conrod","doi":"10.1016/j.lana.2026.101376","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.lana.2026.101376","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":29783,"journal":{"name":"Lancet Regional Health-Americas","volume":"55 ","pages":"Article 101376"},"PeriodicalIF":7.0,"publicationDate":"2026-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"146078147","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Twenty years of efforts to reduce stunting in Ecuador: how to accelerate progress and confront the challenges? 厄瓜多尔为减少发育迟缓所做的20年努力:如何加速进展并面对挑战?
IF 7 Q1 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES Pub Date : 2026-03-01 Epub Date: 2026-02-09 DOI: 10.1016/j.lana.2026.101386
Jairo Rivera , Estefani Jarrín , Ximena Garzon-Villalba , José Ruales
{"title":"Twenty years of efforts to reduce stunting in Ecuador: how to accelerate progress and confront the challenges?","authors":"Jairo Rivera ,&nbsp;Estefani Jarrín ,&nbsp;Ximena Garzon-Villalba ,&nbsp;José Ruales","doi":"10.1016/j.lana.2026.101386","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.lana.2026.101386","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":29783,"journal":{"name":"Lancet Regional Health-Americas","volume":"55 ","pages":"Article 101386"},"PeriodicalIF":7.0,"publicationDate":"2026-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"146188632","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Physical restraint use in a United States intensive care unit—a retrospective cross sectional, single center cohort study from 2008 to 2022 美国重症监护病房的物理约束使用- 2008年至2022年的回顾性横断面单中心队列研究
IF 7 Q1 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES Pub Date : 2026-03-01 Epub Date: 2026-01-14 DOI: 10.1016/j.lana.2026.101374
Maximin Lange , Leo A. Celi , Ben Carter , Jesse D. Raffa , Sharon C. O'Donoghue , Marzyeh Ghassemi , Tom J. Pollard

Background

Physical restraints are widely used in intensive care units (ICUs) despite uncertain clinical benefit and risks. We aimed to characterise patterns of restraint use, demographic and clinical predictors, and temporal trends before and after introduction of federal restraint-related reporting requirements.

Methods

We conducted a retrospective cross-sectional study of 51,838 adults admitted to ICUs at Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, MA, USA, between 2008 and 2022, using data from the Medical Information Mart for Intensive Care IV (MIMIC-IV) electronic health record repository. Primary outcome was the proportion of ICU days with documented physical restraint use. Associations between restraint use and demographic and clinical factors were estimated using a binomial generalised linear model with a logit link. Propensity score matching compared Black and White patients under varying adjustment specifications.

Findings

Among 51,838 patients (mean age 63.8 years; 57% male), 21,091 (40.7%) experienced restraint. Use increased from 36.9% in 2008–10 to 44.0% in 2020–22 (p < 0.0001). Asian (aOR 0.84, 95% CI 0.79–0.89) and Hispanic/Latino patients (aOR 0.87, 95% CI 0.83–0.92) had lower odds of restraint than White patients. Propensity score matching between Black and White patients revealed ethnic patterns were highly sensitive to model specification: excluding demographic characteristics revealed significant disparities, which were attenuated when psychiatric diagnoses were also excluded. Matched White patients were not representative of all White ICU patients but rather a subset resembling Black patients on observed characteristics.

Interpretation

Restraint practices appear to vary with patient acuity, institutional factors, and communication barriers. The sensitivity of ethnic disparities to psychiatric diagnosis adjustment suggests these diagnoses may function as mediators rather than confounders, potentially reflecting systematic differences in clinical assessment along the causal pathway between ethnicity and restraint decisions. The non-representativeness of matched cohorts underscores that disparities depend on which patient subgroups are compared. Prospective multisite studies with standardized assessment protocols are needed to validate findings, disentangle true clinical variation from systematic bias and provide a more comprehensive understanding of restraint practices across US ICU settings.

Funding

No study-specific funding was received.
背景物理约束被广泛应用于重症监护病房(icu),尽管临床效益和风险不确定。我们的目的是描述约束使用模式、人口统计学和临床预测因素,以及引入联邦约束相关报告要求前后的时间趋势。方法我们对2008年至2022年期间在美国马萨诸塞州波士顿Beth Israel Deaconess医疗中心入住icu的51,838名成年人进行了回顾性横断面研究,使用重症监护医疗信息市场IV (MIMIC-IV)电子健康记录库的数据。主要终点是有记录的使用身体约束的ICU天数的比例。约束使用与人口统计学和临床因素之间的关联使用具有logit链接的二项广义线性模型进行估计。倾向评分匹配比较黑人和白人患者在不同的调整规范。在51,838例患者(平均年龄63.8岁,57%为男性)中,21,091例(40.7%)经历过约束。使用量从2008 - 2010年的36.9%增加到2020 - 2022年的44.0% (p < 0.0001)。亚洲患者(aOR 0.84, 95% CI 0.79-0.89)和西班牙裔/拉丁裔患者(aOR 0.87, 95% CI 0.83-0.92)约束的几率低于白人患者。黑人和白人患者的倾向评分匹配显示种族模式对模型规格高度敏感;排除人口统计学特征显示显著差异,当排除精神病学诊断时,这种差异减弱。匹配的白人患者并不代表所有白人ICU患者,而是在观察特征上与黑人患者相似的一个子集。约束实践似乎因患者的敏锐度、制度因素和沟通障碍而异。种族差异对精神病诊断调整的敏感性表明,这些诊断可能起到中介作用,而不是混杂因素,潜在地反映了沿着种族和约束决策之间因果路径的临床评估的系统差异。匹配队列的非代表性强调了差异取决于比较哪些患者亚组。需要采用标准化评估方案的前瞻性多地点研究来验证研究结果,从系统偏倚中理清真正的临床差异,并对美国ICU环境中的约束实践提供更全面的了解。没有收到研究专项资金。
{"title":"Physical restraint use in a United States intensive care unit—a retrospective cross sectional, single center cohort study from 2008 to 2022","authors":"Maximin Lange ,&nbsp;Leo A. Celi ,&nbsp;Ben Carter ,&nbsp;Jesse D. Raffa ,&nbsp;Sharon C. O'Donoghue ,&nbsp;Marzyeh Ghassemi ,&nbsp;Tom J. Pollard","doi":"10.1016/j.lana.2026.101374","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.lana.2026.101374","url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Physical restraints are widely used in intensive care units (ICUs) despite uncertain clinical benefit and risks. We aimed to characterise patterns of restraint use, demographic and clinical predictors, and temporal trends before and after introduction of federal restraint-related reporting requirements.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>We conducted a retrospective cross-sectional study of 51,838 adults admitted to ICUs at Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, MA, USA, between 2008 and 2022, using data from the Medical Information Mart for Intensive Care IV (MIMIC-IV) electronic health record repository. Primary outcome was the proportion of ICU days with documented physical restraint use. Associations between restraint use and demographic and clinical factors were estimated using a binomial generalised linear model with a logit link. Propensity score matching compared Black and White patients under varying adjustment specifications.</div></div><div><h3>Findings</h3><div>Among 51,838 patients (mean age 63.8 years; 57% male), 21,091 (40.7%) experienced restraint. Use increased from 36.9% in 2008–10 to 44.0% in 2020–22 (p &lt; 0.0001). Asian (aOR 0.84, 95% CI 0.79–0.89) and Hispanic/Latino patients (aOR 0.87, 95% CI 0.83–0.92) had lower odds of restraint than White patients. Propensity score matching between Black and White patients revealed ethnic patterns were highly sensitive to model specification: excluding demographic characteristics revealed significant disparities, which were attenuated when psychiatric diagnoses were also excluded. Matched White patients were not representative of all White ICU patients but rather a subset resembling Black patients on observed characteristics.</div></div><div><h3>Interpretation</h3><div>Restraint practices appear to vary with patient acuity, institutional factors, and communication barriers. The sensitivity of ethnic disparities to psychiatric diagnosis adjustment suggests these diagnoses may function as mediators rather than confounders, potentially reflecting systematic differences in clinical assessment along the causal pathway between ethnicity and restraint decisions. The non-representativeness of matched cohorts underscores that disparities depend on which patient subgroups are compared. Prospective multisite studies with standardized assessment protocols are needed to validate findings, disentangle true clinical variation from systematic bias and provide a more comprehensive understanding of restraint practices across US ICU settings.</div></div><div><h3>Funding</h3><div>No study-specific funding was received.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":29783,"journal":{"name":"Lancet Regional Health-Americas","volume":"55 ","pages":"Article 101374"},"PeriodicalIF":7.0,"publicationDate":"2026-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145978367","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Exercise dose, measurement reliability, and mechanistic inference in fibromyalgia trials: a critical appraisal 纤维肌痛试验中的运动剂量、测量可靠性和机制推断:一个关键评价
IF 7 Q1 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES Pub Date : 2026-03-01 Epub Date: 2026-02-09 DOI: 10.1016/j.lana.2026.101384
André Pontes-Silva
{"title":"Exercise dose, measurement reliability, and mechanistic inference in fibromyalgia trials: a critical appraisal","authors":"André Pontes-Silva","doi":"10.1016/j.lana.2026.101384","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.lana.2026.101384","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":29783,"journal":{"name":"Lancet Regional Health-Americas","volume":"55 ","pages":"Article 101384"},"PeriodicalIF":7.0,"publicationDate":"2026-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"146188631","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Impact and scope of Mexican clinical practice guideline for adult overweight and obesity on weight stigma 墨西哥成人超重和肥胖临床实践指南对体重污名的影响和范围
IF 7 Q1 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES Pub Date : 2026-03-01 Epub Date: 2026-01-07 DOI: 10.1016/j.lana.2025.101366
Emma Chávez-Manzanera , Verónica Vázquez-Velázquez
{"title":"Impact and scope of Mexican clinical practice guideline for adult overweight and obesity on weight stigma","authors":"Emma Chávez-Manzanera ,&nbsp;Verónica Vázquez-Velázquez","doi":"10.1016/j.lana.2025.101366","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.lana.2025.101366","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":29783,"journal":{"name":"Lancet Regional Health-Americas","volume":"55 ","pages":"Article 101366"},"PeriodicalIF":7.0,"publicationDate":"2026-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145927694","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
An undeniable public health urgency, but an incomplete response: centering racial and ethnic equity in Canada's “Strategic approaches to reducing the substance use-related burden of disease” 不可否认的公共卫生紧迫性,但不完整的回应:将种族和族裔平等作为加拿大“减少药物使用相关疾病负担的战略方针”的中心
IF 7 Q1 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES Pub Date : 2026-03-01 Epub Date: 2026-01-07 DOI: 10.1016/j.lana.2025.101370
Jude Mary Cénat , Idrissa Beogo , Monnica Williams , Smita Pakhale
{"title":"An undeniable public health urgency, but an incomplete response: centering racial and ethnic equity in Canada's “Strategic approaches to reducing the substance use-related burden of disease”","authors":"Jude Mary Cénat ,&nbsp;Idrissa Beogo ,&nbsp;Monnica Williams ,&nbsp;Smita Pakhale","doi":"10.1016/j.lana.2025.101370","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.lana.2025.101370","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":29783,"journal":{"name":"Lancet Regional Health-Americas","volume":"55 ","pages":"Article 101370"},"PeriodicalIF":7.0,"publicationDate":"2026-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145927696","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Expanding the neurological spectrum of HTLV-1 beyond HAM/TSP: a contemporary perspective 扩展HTLV-1超越HAM/TSP的神经谱:当代视角
IF 7 Q1 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES Pub Date : 2026-03-01 Epub Date: 2025-12-31 DOI: 10.1016/j.lana.2025.101347
Abelardo Q.C. Araujo , Marcus Tulius T. Silva
Human T-lymphotropic virus type 1 (HTLV-1) has long been linked mainly to HTLV-1-associated myelopathy/tropical spastic paraparesis (HAM/TSP). However, four decades of research show that the virus causes a much broader range of neurological conditions. In Latin America and the Caribbean—regions with high prevalence but limited awareness, diagnostic capacity, and treatment—its burden is especially severe. Misdiagnosis or neglect often delays care, leading to increased disability and emotional distress. This Personal View highlights the expanding neurological spectrum of HTLV-1, which includes rare but well-documented encephalopathy, cognitive decline, peripheral neuropathy, inflammatory myopathy, cerebellar dysfunction, autonomic disorders, motor neuron disease-like syndromes, and seizures. These can happen independently or alongside HAM/TSP. The proposed concept of an “HTLV-1 neurological complex” better represents this multifaceted involvement. Recognising this diversity is essential for accurate diagnosis and better outcomes, particularly in endemic settings. A paradigm shift is needed—one that broadens the clinical focus beyond myelopathy to encompass the full neurological spectrum, thereby improving global care and management.
人类嗜t淋巴病毒1型(HTLV-1)长期以来主要与HTLV-1相关的脊髓病/热带痉挛性麻痹(HAM/TSP)有关。然而,40年的研究表明,这种病毒引起的神经系统疾病范围要广得多。在拉丁美洲和加勒比- - -患病率高但认识、诊断能力和治疗有限的地区- - -其负担尤其严重。误诊或忽视往往延误护理,导致残疾和情绪困扰增加。本个人观点强调了HTLV-1不断扩大的神经谱系,包括罕见但文献充分的脑病、认知能力下降、周围神经病变、炎症性肌病、小脑功能障碍、自主神经障碍、运动神经元疾病样综合征和癫痫发作。这些可以独立发生,也可以与HAM/TSP一起发生。提出的“HTLV-1神经复合体”概念更好地代表了这种多方面的参与。认识到这种多样性对于准确诊断和获得更好的结果至关重要,特别是在流行环境中。我们需要一种模式的转变——将临床重点从脊髓病扩展到整个神经系统,从而改善全球的护理和管理。
{"title":"Expanding the neurological spectrum of HTLV-1 beyond HAM/TSP: a contemporary perspective","authors":"Abelardo Q.C. Araujo ,&nbsp;Marcus Tulius T. Silva","doi":"10.1016/j.lana.2025.101347","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.lana.2025.101347","url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Human T-lymphotropic virus type 1 (HTLV-1) has long been linked mainly to HTLV-1-associated myelopathy/tropical spastic paraparesis (HAM/TSP). However, four decades of research show that the virus causes a much broader range of neurological conditions. In Latin America and the Caribbean—regions with high prevalence but limited awareness, diagnostic capacity, and treatment—its burden is especially severe. Misdiagnosis or neglect often delays care, leading to increased disability and emotional distress. This Personal View highlights the expanding neurological spectrum of HTLV-1, which includes rare but well-documented encephalopathy, cognitive decline, peripheral neuropathy, inflammatory myopathy, cerebellar dysfunction, autonomic disorders, motor neuron disease-like syndromes, and seizures. These can happen independently or alongside HAM/TSP. The proposed concept of an “HTLV-1 neurological complex” better represents this multifaceted involvement. Recognising this diversity is essential for accurate diagnosis and better outcomes, particularly in endemic settings. A paradigm shift is needed—one that broadens the clinical focus beyond myelopathy to encompass the full neurological spectrum, thereby improving global care and management.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":29783,"journal":{"name":"Lancet Regional Health-Americas","volume":"55 ","pages":"Article 101347"},"PeriodicalIF":7.0,"publicationDate":"2026-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145885799","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Inclusion of incarcerated individuals in wildfire exposure registries 将被监禁的个人纳入野火暴露登记册
IF 7 Q1 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES Pub Date : 2026-03-01 Epub Date: 2025-12-29 DOI: 10.1016/j.lana.2025.101354
Lawrence A. Haber , Katherine LeMasters , Justin Berk
{"title":"Inclusion of incarcerated individuals in wildfire exposure registries","authors":"Lawrence A. Haber ,&nbsp;Katherine LeMasters ,&nbsp;Justin Berk","doi":"10.1016/j.lana.2025.101354","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.lana.2025.101354","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":29783,"journal":{"name":"Lancet Regional Health-Americas","volume":"55 ","pages":"Article 101354"},"PeriodicalIF":7.0,"publicationDate":"2026-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145885803","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Associations between state-level abortion restrictions and postpartum depression symptoms from a United States nationwide cohort 来自美国全国队列的州一级堕胎限制与产后抑郁症状之间的关系
IF 7 Q1 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES Pub Date : 2026-03-01 Epub Date: 2026-02-19 DOI: 10.1016/j.lana.2026.101410
Maetal E. Haas-Kogan , Andrea Pelletier , Amanda Koire , Primavera A. Spagnolo , Deborah Bartz

Background

U.S. maternal mortality rates have more than doubled over the last two decades, with maternal mental health conditions being significant contributors. Concurrently, the adoption of U.S. state-level restrictions on abortion access have also increased. We aimed to examine the association between the number of state-level abortion restrictions and postpartum depression symptoms in a U.S. nationwide cohort.

Methods

This retrospective cohort study compared state-level abortion restriction policy data from the Guttmacher Institute from each preceding year (2016–2021) to rates of postpartum depression symptoms collected from the nationally representative Pregnancy Risk Assessment Monitoring System (PRAMS) Phase 8 (2017–2022) dataset. PRAMS participants were randomly selected from 41 participating states’ birth registries, representing 30·4% of U.S. live births. The primary outcome was postpartum depression symptoms, assessed using validated screening questions. Secondary outcomes included demographic and clinical predictors of postpartum depression. Variables found to be significant on bivariate analysis were included in the logistic multivariable model. People with lived experience were involved in the design, analysis, and interpretation of this study.

Findings

The sample included 201,770 respondents, weighted to represent 5·65 million individuals. The mean age was 29·7 years, with 72·6% identifying as White and 57·9% having private insurance. Higher numbers of state-level abortion restrictions were associated with increased odds of postpartum depression symptoms (OR = 1·02, 95% CI [1·01, 1·03], p = 0·001), particularly among those relying on public insurance (OR = 1·02, 95% CI [1·01–1·04], p = 0·002). This association was particularly pronounced among racial and ethnic minorities, individuals with a history of depression, and those with lower levels of education or income who gave birth in high-restriction states.

Interpretation

The adoption of more abortion restrictions is linked to higher prevalence of postpartum depression symptoms, especially for those with public insurance. These findings show that restricted abortion has detrimental effects on perinatal mental health, highlighting the need for policy reforms.

Funding

No funding was provided for this study, funding from Brigham and Women's Hospital, Mary Horrigan Connors Center for Women's Health Research was provided for journal editorial processing fees.
背景:在过去二十年中,美国孕产妇死亡率增加了一倍多,孕产妇心理健康状况是主要原因。与此同时,美国各州对堕胎的限制也有所增加。我们的目的是在美国全国范围内研究州一级堕胎限制数量与产后抑郁症状之间的关系。方法:本回顾性队列研究比较了古特马赫研究所(Guttmacher Institute)每年(2016-2021年)的州级堕胎限制政策数据与全国代表性妊娠风险评估监测系统(PRAMS)第8期(2017-2022年)数据集收集的产后抑郁症状率。PRAMS的参与者是从41个参与州的出生登记处随机选择的,占美国活产婴儿的30.4%。主要结果是产后抑郁症状,使用有效的筛查问题进行评估。次要结局包括产后抑郁的人口学和临床预测因素。在双变量分析中发现显著的变量被纳入logistic多变量模型。有生活经验的人参与了这项研究的设计、分析和解释。调查结果:样本包括201,770名受访者,加权后代表565万人。平均年龄为29.7岁,其中72.6%为白人,57.9%有私人保险。较高的州一级堕胎限制与产后抑郁症状的发生率增加相关(OR = 1.02, 95% CI [1.01, 1.03], p = 0.001),特别是那些依赖公共保险的人(OR = 1.02, 95% CI [1.01 - 1.04], p = 0.002)。这种联系在少数民族、有抑郁症病史的人、教育水平或收入较低、在高限制州分娩的人身上尤为明显。解释:更多的堕胎限制与产后抑郁症状的高患病率有关,特别是对于那些有公共保险的人。这些调查结果表明,限制堕胎对围产期心理健康有不利影响,突出了政策改革的必要性。经费:本研究未获资助,由布莱根妇女医院、玛丽·霍里根·康纳斯妇女健康研究中心提供期刊编辑处理费。
{"title":"Associations between state-level abortion restrictions and postpartum depression symptoms from a United States nationwide cohort","authors":"Maetal E. Haas-Kogan ,&nbsp;Andrea Pelletier ,&nbsp;Amanda Koire ,&nbsp;Primavera A. Spagnolo ,&nbsp;Deborah Bartz","doi":"10.1016/j.lana.2026.101410","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.lana.2026.101410","url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>U.S. maternal mortality rates have more than doubled over the last two decades, with maternal mental health conditions being significant contributors. Concurrently, the adoption of U.S. state-level restrictions on abortion access have also increased. We aimed to examine the association between the number of state-level abortion restrictions and postpartum depression symptoms in a U.S. nationwide cohort.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>This retrospective cohort study compared state-level abortion restriction policy data from the Guttmacher Institute from each preceding year (2016–2021) to rates of postpartum depression symptoms collected from the nationally representative Pregnancy Risk Assessment Monitoring System (PRAMS) Phase 8 (2017–2022) dataset. PRAMS participants were randomly selected from 41 participating states’ birth registries, representing 30·4% of U.S. live births. The primary outcome was postpartum depression symptoms, assessed using validated screening questions. Secondary outcomes included demographic and clinical predictors of postpartum depression. Variables found to be significant on bivariate analysis were included in the logistic multivariable model. People with lived experience were involved in the design, analysis, and interpretation of this study.</div></div><div><h3>Findings</h3><div>The sample included 201,770 respondents, weighted to represent 5·65 million individuals. The mean age was 29·7 years, with 72·6% identifying as White and 57·9% having private insurance. Higher numbers of state-level abortion restrictions were associated with increased odds of postpartum depression symptoms (OR = 1·02, 95% CI [1·01, 1·03], p = 0·001), particularly among those relying on public insurance (OR = 1·02, 95% CI [1·01–1·04], p = 0·002). This association was particularly pronounced among racial and ethnic minorities, individuals with a history of depression, and those with lower levels of education or income who gave birth in high-restriction states.</div></div><div><h3>Interpretation</h3><div>The adoption of more abortion restrictions is linked to higher prevalence of postpartum depression symptoms, especially for those with public insurance. These findings show that restricted abortion has detrimental effects on perinatal mental health, highlighting the need for policy reforms.</div></div><div><h3>Funding</h3><div>No funding was provided for this study, funding from Brigham and Women's Hospital, <span>Mary Horrigan Connors Center for Women's Health Research</span> was provided for journal editorial processing fees.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":29783,"journal":{"name":"Lancet Regional Health-Americas","volume":"55 ","pages":"Article 101410"},"PeriodicalIF":7.0,"publicationDate":"2026-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"147327404","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
期刊
Lancet Regional Health-Americas
全部 Acc. Chem. Res. ACS Applied Bio Materials ACS Appl. Electron. Mater. ACS Appl. Energy Mater. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces ACS Appl. Nano Mater. ACS Appl. Polym. Mater. ACS BIOMATER-SCI ENG ACS Catal. ACS Cent. Sci. ACS Chem. Biol. ACS Chemical Health & Safety ACS Chem. Neurosci. ACS Comb. Sci. ACS Earth Space Chem. ACS Energy Lett. ACS Infect. Dis. ACS Macro Lett. ACS Mater. Lett. ACS Med. Chem. Lett. ACS Nano ACS Omega ACS Photonics ACS Sens. ACS Sustainable Chem. Eng. ACS Synth. Biol. Anal. Chem. BIOCHEMISTRY-US Bioconjugate Chem. BIOMACROMOLECULES Chem. Res. Toxicol. Chem. Rev. Chem. Mater. CRYST GROWTH DES ENERG FUEL Environ. Sci. Technol. Environ. Sci. Technol. Lett. Eur. J. Inorg. Chem. IND ENG CHEM RES Inorg. Chem. J. Agric. Food. Chem. J. Chem. Eng. Data J. Chem. Educ. J. Chem. Inf. Model. J. Chem. Theory Comput. J. Med. Chem. J. Nat. Prod. J PROTEOME RES J. Am. Chem. Soc. LANGMUIR MACROMOLECULES Mol. Pharmaceutics Nano Lett. Org. Lett. ORG PROCESS RES DEV ORGANOMETALLICS J. Org. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. A J. Phys. Chem. B J. Phys. Chem. C J. Phys. Chem. Lett. Analyst Anal. Methods Biomater. Sci. Catal. Sci. Technol. Chem. Commun. Chem. Soc. Rev. CHEM EDUC RES PRACT CRYSTENGCOMM Dalton Trans. Energy Environ. Sci. ENVIRON SCI-NANO ENVIRON SCI-PROC IMP ENVIRON SCI-WAT RES Faraday Discuss. Food Funct. Green Chem. Inorg. Chem. Front. Integr. Biol. J. Anal. At. Spectrom. J. Mater. Chem. A J. Mater. Chem. B J. Mater. Chem. C Lab Chip Mater. Chem. Front. Mater. Horiz. MEDCHEMCOMM Metallomics Mol. Biosyst. Mol. Syst. Des. Eng. Nanoscale Nanoscale Horiz. Nat. Prod. Rep. New J. Chem. Org. Biomol. Chem. Org. Chem. Front. PHOTOCH PHOTOBIO SCI PCCP Polym. Chem.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1