{"title":"Cooperative Rape","authors":"Gabriel M. Glasser","doi":"10.25148/lawrev.13.3.10","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.25148/lawrev.13.3.10","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":300333,"journal":{"name":"FIU Law Review","volume":"28 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2019-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"133831214","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"“Good Orthodoxy” and the Legacy Of Barnette","authors":"E. Goldberg","doi":"10.25148/LAWREV.13.4.6","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.25148/LAWREV.13.4.6","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":300333,"journal":{"name":"FIU Law Review","volume":"65 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2019-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"126630817","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"Justice Jackson in The Jehovah’s Witnesses’ Cases","authors":"J. Barrett","doi":"10.25148/LAWREV.13.4.13","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.25148/LAWREV.13.4.13","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":300333,"journal":{"name":"FIU Law Review","volume":"31 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2019-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"121113607","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Advocate Shahara Khatun, MP, Hon'ble Minister for Home Affairs, Government of the People's Republic of Bangladesh inaugurated the conference as the Chief Guest. H. E. Mr. Tamotsu Shinotsuka, Ambassador of Japan to Bangladesh, was present at the inaugural session as the Special Guest. Major General Sheikh Md Monirul Islam, ndc, psc, Director General of BIISS delivered the Address of Welcome. Major General Muhammed Firdaus Mian, psc, Chairman, Board of Governors of BliSS presided over the inaugural session. Professor Muzaffer Ahmad, Former Chairman, Transparency International Bangladesh (TlB) and Member, Board of Governors of BIISS was the Chief Guest at the concluding session of the conference.
{"title":"Summary of the Proceedings","authors":"Scott F. Norberg","doi":"10.25148/LAWREV.13.3.4","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.25148/LAWREV.13.3.4","url":null,"abstract":"Advocate Shahara Khatun, MP, Hon'ble Minister for Home Affairs, Government of the People's Republic of Bangladesh inaugurated the conference as the Chief Guest. H. E. Mr. Tamotsu Shinotsuka, Ambassador of Japan to Bangladesh, was present at the inaugural session as the Special Guest. Major General Sheikh Md Monirul Islam, ndc, psc, Director General of BIISS delivered the Address of Welcome. Major General Muhammed Firdaus Mian, psc, Chairman, Board of Governors of BliSS presided over the inaugural session. Professor Muzaffer Ahmad, Former Chairman, Transparency International Bangladesh (TlB) and Member, Board of Governors of BIISS was the Chief Guest at the concluding session of the conference.","PeriodicalId":300333,"journal":{"name":"FIU Law Review","volume":"38 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2019-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"115710196","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"Thoughts on Hayden C. Covington and the Paucity of Litigation Scholarship","authors":"R. Collins","doi":"10.25148/LAWREV.13.4.5","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.25148/LAWREV.13.4.5","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":300333,"journal":{"name":"FIU Law Review","volume":"41 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2019-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"123921678","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"The ILC’s Past Practice on Progressive Development and Codification of International Law—An Empirical Analysis Focusing on the Law of the Sea, Law of Treaties and State Responsibility","authors":"Patrícia Galvão Teles","doi":"10.25148/lawrev.13.6.7","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.25148/lawrev.13.6.7","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":300333,"journal":{"name":"FIU Law Review","volume":"331 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2019-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"114707158","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"Just Say No to the Cheap Double Play","authors":"Richard D. Friedman","doi":"10.25148/LAWREV.13.5.5","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.25148/LAWREV.13.5.5","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":300333,"journal":{"name":"FIU Law Review","volume":"2 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2019-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"122060163","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Cryptocurrencies, like Bitcoin, present challenges to plaintiffs seeking to recover these digital assets. No third-party intermediaries are involved in cryptocurrency transactions, and there is no controlling authority that can revoke or avoid a transaction once completed. The possessor of a cryptocurrency’s private key—its password—has total and exclusive control over the account’s assets. These digital assets cross jurisdictional boundaries without impediment. The features of cryptocurrencies make it easy for defendants to judgment-proof themselves and make these assets difficult to recover after a court has entered judgment. This comment explains cryptocurrency features relevant to asset recovery, explores pre-and post-judgment procedures as applied to cryptocurrencies
{"title":"The Challenges of Cryptocurrency Asset Recovery","authors":"Andrew W. Balthazor","doi":"10.25148/lawrev.13.6.16","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.25148/lawrev.13.6.16","url":null,"abstract":"Cryptocurrencies, like Bitcoin, present challenges to plaintiffs seeking to recover these digital assets. No third-party intermediaries are involved in cryptocurrency transactions, and there is no controlling authority that can revoke or avoid a transaction once completed. The possessor of a cryptocurrency’s private key—its password—has total and exclusive control over the account’s assets. These digital assets cross jurisdictional boundaries without impediment. The features of cryptocurrencies make it easy for defendants to judgment-proof themselves and make these assets difficult to recover after a court has entered judgment. This comment explains cryptocurrency features relevant to asset recovery, explores pre-and post-judgment procedures as applied to cryptocurrencies","PeriodicalId":300333,"journal":{"name":"FIU Law Review","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2019-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"125434460","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
The Fourth Amendment provides limited protections for automobile passengers against governmental intrusion. A passenger is only protected against unreasonable searches in places where he harbors a reasonable expectation of privacy. The Supreme Court has not yet considered the reasonable expectation of privacy of passengers in Uber and Lyft. The modern transportation innovations require that the Court consider the reasonableness of the existing Fourth Amendment doctrine. In application, the doctrine does not adequately protect Uber and Lyft passengers, because it fails to consider how transportation advances have evolved society’s privacy expectations. To remedy these shortcomings, the Court must establish consistent jurisprudence for privacy rights in vehicles. Introduction ................................................................................................552 I. Remembering the Antique Fourth Amendment Doctrine ...............556 A. The Fourth Amendment and Privacy Interests ........................556 B. An Individual’s Diminished Expectation of Privacy in Automobiles .............................................................................559 1. The Automobile Exception ................................................560 a. The Scope of Searches Under the Automobile Exception .....................................................................561 i. California v. Acevedo’s Container Rule ...............562 2. Search Incident to Arrest in the Automobile Context ..............562 a. Passenger’s Privacy Rights: Wyoming v. Houghton’s Common Enterprise Assumption ................................563 II. Something Old and Something New: Traditional For-Hire Vehicles and Modern For-Hire Vehicles .......................................................565 A. Fourth Amendment Taxonomy of Passenger Rides ................565 1. For-Hire Vehicles ...............................................................567 *J.D. candidate, 2019, Florida International University (FIU) College of Law. The author would like to thank Joëlle Moreno, Associate Dean for Faculty Research and Development & Professor of Law at FIU College of Law, for her guidance and feedback on this Comment and throughout my journey at FIU College of Law. 08 MARTINEZ.DOCX (DO NOT DELETE) 4/11/19 1:00 PM 552 FIU Law Review [Vol. 13:551 2. Traditional For-Hire Vehicles: A Passenger’s Reasonable Expectation of Privacy in a Taxicab ..................................567 3. Modern For-Hire Vehicles: The Advent of Technology Based Transportation .........................................................569 III. Confronting an Old Problem in a New Setting: Predicting The Privacy Interests of Passengers in Modern For-Hire Vehicles .......571 A. Revisiting The Fourth Amendment Doctrine ..........................571 B. Passengers in Modern For-Hire Vehicles Have a Reasonable Expectation of Privacy Under Katz v. United States ...............572 1. The Geographical Composition of the Interi
{"title":"The Constitutional Risks of Ridesharing: Fourth Amendment Protections of Passengers in Uber and Lyft","authors":"G. Martinez","doi":"10.25148/LAWREV.13.3.11","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.25148/LAWREV.13.3.11","url":null,"abstract":"The Fourth Amendment provides limited protections for automobile passengers against governmental intrusion. A passenger is only protected against unreasonable searches in places where he harbors a reasonable expectation of privacy. The Supreme Court has not yet considered the reasonable expectation of privacy of passengers in Uber and Lyft. The modern transportation innovations require that the Court consider the reasonableness of the existing Fourth Amendment doctrine. In application, the doctrine does not adequately protect Uber and Lyft passengers, because it fails to consider how transportation advances have evolved society’s privacy expectations. To remedy these shortcomings, the Court must establish consistent jurisprudence for privacy rights in vehicles. Introduction ................................................................................................552 I. Remembering the Antique Fourth Amendment Doctrine ...............556 A. The Fourth Amendment and Privacy Interests ........................556 B. An Individual’s Diminished Expectation of Privacy in Automobiles .............................................................................559 1. The Automobile Exception ................................................560 a. The Scope of Searches Under the Automobile Exception .....................................................................561 i. California v. Acevedo’s Container Rule ...............562 2. Search Incident to Arrest in the Automobile Context ..............562 a. Passenger’s Privacy Rights: Wyoming v. Houghton’s Common Enterprise Assumption ................................563 II. Something Old and Something New: Traditional For-Hire Vehicles and Modern For-Hire Vehicles .......................................................565 A. Fourth Amendment Taxonomy of Passenger Rides ................565 1. For-Hire Vehicles ...............................................................567 *J.D. candidate, 2019, Florida International University (FIU) College of Law. The author would like to thank Joëlle Moreno, Associate Dean for Faculty Research and Development & Professor of Law at FIU College of Law, for her guidance and feedback on this Comment and throughout my journey at FIU College of Law. 08 MARTINEZ.DOCX (DO NOT DELETE) 4/11/19 1:00 PM 552 FIU Law Review [Vol. 13:551 2. Traditional For-Hire Vehicles: A Passenger’s Reasonable Expectation of Privacy in a Taxicab ..................................567 3. Modern For-Hire Vehicles: The Advent of Technology Based Transportation .........................................................569 III. Confronting an Old Problem in a New Setting: Predicting The Privacy Interests of Passengers in Modern For-Hire Vehicles .......571 A. Revisiting The Fourth Amendment Doctrine ..........................571 B. Passengers in Modern For-Hire Vehicles Have a Reasonable Expectation of Privacy Under Katz v. United States ...............572 1. The Geographical Composition of the Interi","PeriodicalId":300333,"journal":{"name":"FIU Law Review","volume":"54 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2019-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"127170967","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"The ILC at Its 70th Anniversary: Its Role in International Law and Its Impact on U.S. Jurisprudence","authors":"Siegfried Wiessner, C. Gonzalez","doi":"10.25148/LAWREV.13.6.14","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.25148/LAWREV.13.6.14","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":300333,"journal":{"name":"FIU Law Review","volume":"59 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2019-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"114077114","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
京公网安备 11010802042870号
京ICP备2023020795号-1
扫码关注我们
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：