David Cobos Sanchiz, José María León-Pérez, Francisco Javier Cantero-Sánchez, José María León-Rubio
Compassion fatigue is a widely recognized phenomenon in human care settings, but it has been little explored in the veterinary field, despite sharing many of the same determinants. This study aimed to (1) identify distinct emotional risk profiles in veterinarians based on their levels of compassion fatigue and satisfaction; (2) estimate the relative prevalence of compassion fatigue in each of these profiles; and (3) analyze the predictive value of sociodemographic variables (gender, age, cohabitation) on belonging to these profiles. A cross-sectional study was conducted with 135 practising veterinarians. An abbreviated version of the ProQOL scale, adapted to the animal context, was used. Its two-dimensional structure (compassion fatigue and satisfaction) was validated using confirmatory factor analysis. Hierarchical cluster and k-means analyses were performed on the factor scores, which identified four emotional profiles: (1) intense emotional involvement, (2) emotional detachment, (3) functional distancing, and (4) high emotional risk. The latter grouped 23% of the sample, while 50.4% presented significant levels of emotional exhaustion. Finally, an ordinal regression was applied, which showed that being over 44 years of age (OR = 2.11) and living with a partner (OR = 1.94) increase perceived emotional risk, with no significant effects of gender. The findings highlight the need for training initiatives that enhance emotional regulation and communication with animal guardians or owners, while promoting sustainable, ethically responsible, and emotionally healthy professional practice.
{"title":"Identification of Compassion Fatigue Risk Profiles in Veterinarians: Implications for Prevention and Professional Well-Being.","authors":"David Cobos Sanchiz, José María León-Pérez, Francisco Javier Cantero-Sánchez, José María León-Rubio","doi":"10.3390/ejihpe15100217","DOIUrl":"10.3390/ejihpe15100217","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Compassion fatigue is a widely recognized phenomenon in human care settings, but it has been little explored in the veterinary field, despite sharing many of the same determinants. This study aimed to (1) identify distinct emotional risk profiles in veterinarians based on their levels of compassion fatigue and satisfaction; (2) estimate the relative prevalence of compassion fatigue in each of these profiles; and (3) analyze the predictive value of sociodemographic variables (gender, age, cohabitation) on belonging to these profiles. A cross-sectional study was conducted with 135 practising veterinarians. An abbreviated version of the ProQOL scale, adapted to the animal context, was used. Its two-dimensional structure (compassion fatigue and satisfaction) was validated using confirmatory factor analysis. Hierarchical cluster and k-means analyses were performed on the factor scores, which identified four emotional profiles: (1) intense emotional involvement, (2) emotional detachment, (3) functional distancing, and (4) high emotional risk. The latter grouped 23% of the sample, while 50.4% presented significant levels of emotional exhaustion. Finally, an ordinal regression was applied, which showed that being over 44 years of age (OR = 2.11) and living with a partner (OR = 1.94) increase perceived emotional risk, with no significant effects of gender. The findings highlight the need for training initiatives that enhance emotional regulation and communication with animal guardians or owners, while promoting sustainable, ethically responsible, and emotionally healthy professional practice.</p>","PeriodicalId":30631,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Investigation in Health Psychology and Education","volume":"15 10","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.6,"publicationDate":"2025-10-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12563992/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145393775","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Workplace accidents and injuries continue to be a challenge in high-risk industries such as healthcare, where safety is a daily critical concern. Although organizational factors such as safety climate have been well-established as predictors of safety-related outcomes, less is known about the role of individual differences in workplace safety. This research investigates safety locus of control, which captures an employee's tendency to believe that their safety-oriented behaviors actually play a role in preventing safety incidents. Individuals with a highly internal safety locus of control tend to recognize the importance of their own and others' safety actions for promoting workplace safety and preventing safety-related incidents from occurring in their workplace, whereas employees with low internal safety locus of control tend to believe that adverse safety outcomes have less to do with employee behavior and are more the result of luck or chance (i.e., have a more external orientation). Across three studies (with a total of 792 participants), we developed a measure for assessing safety locus of control (Study 1), evaluated its construct validity (Study 2), and measured its incremental validity on workplace safety beyond other important constructs like safety climate (Study 3). Results suggest that safety locus of control helps to explain critical workplace safety outcomes (such as safety performance) beyond environmental factors such as safety climate alone and plays an influential role on well-established safety processes within the workplace. This research highlights the importance of considering individual differences alongside environmental factors in workplace safety models.
{"title":"Owning Workplace Safety: Investigating Safety Locus of Control Among Nurses.","authors":"Archana Manapragada Tedone, Jessica Mesmer-Magnus, Julie J Lanz, Chockalingam Viswesvaran","doi":"10.3390/ejihpe15100216","DOIUrl":"10.3390/ejihpe15100216","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Workplace accidents and injuries continue to be a challenge in high-risk industries such as healthcare, where safety is a daily critical concern. Although organizational factors such as safety climate have been well-established as predictors of safety-related outcomes, less is known about the role of individual differences in workplace safety. This research investigates <i>safety locus of control</i>, which captures an employee's tendency to believe that their safety-oriented behaviors actually play a role in preventing safety incidents. Individuals with a highly internal safety locus of control tend to recognize the importance of their own and others' safety actions for promoting workplace safety and preventing safety-related incidents from occurring in their workplace, whereas employees with low internal safety locus of control tend to believe that adverse safety outcomes have less to do with employee behavior and are more the result of luck or chance (i.e., have a more external orientation). Across three studies (with a total of 792 participants), we developed a measure for assessing safety locus of control (Study 1), evaluated its construct validity (Study 2), and measured its incremental validity on workplace safety beyond other important constructs like safety climate (Study 3). Results suggest that safety locus of control helps to explain critical workplace safety outcomes (such as safety performance) beyond environmental factors such as safety climate alone and plays an influential role on well-established safety processes within the workplace. This research highlights the importance of considering individual differences alongside environmental factors in workplace safety models.</p>","PeriodicalId":30631,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Investigation in Health Psychology and Education","volume":"15 10","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.6,"publicationDate":"2025-10-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12563002/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145393520","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Constantinos M Kokkinos, Theano-Athanasia Papioti, Ioanna Voulgaridou
The authors wish to make the following corrections to their paper (Kokkinos et al [...].
作者希望对他们的论文(Kokkinos et al .[…])进行以下更正。
{"title":"Correction: Kokkinos et al. (2025). Predictors of Proclivity, Enjoyment, and Acceptance of Non-Consensual Intimate-Image Distribution Among Greek University Students. <i>European Journal of Investigation in Health, Psychology and Education</i>, <i>15</i>(8), 150.","authors":"Constantinos M Kokkinos, Theano-Athanasia Papioti, Ioanna Voulgaridou","doi":"10.3390/ejihpe15100215","DOIUrl":"10.3390/ejihpe15100215","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The authors wish to make the following corrections to their paper (Kokkinos et al [...].</p>","PeriodicalId":30631,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Investigation in Health Psychology and Education","volume":"15 10","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.6,"publicationDate":"2025-10-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12562996/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145393819","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Alberta Sousa, Maria João Rodrigues, Mariana Rodrigues, Nadine Poltz, Angeles Conde-Rodriguez, Paulo A S Moreira
The value of grade retention as a pedagogic resource remains a subject of debate because of its costs and benefits. In fact, it has been repeatedly argued that grade retention has substantial psychosocial effects. Student engagement with school is one of the dimensions that is expected to be more affected by grade retention. This article aimed to contribute to this debate by examining the relationship between grade retention and various dimensions of student engagement with school. With that purpose in mind, we analyzed data from a sample at one point in time (cross-sectional) and over three points in time (longitudinal), and expanded their meaning for Inclusive Education and for Person-centered schools. The cross-sectional sample comprised 739 students aged 14 to 19 years (M = 16.47, SD = 0.59), while the longitudinal sample included 238 students aged 11 to 15 years (M = 13.29, SD = 0.54 at the first assessment). Student engagement with school was measured using the Multifactorial Measure of Student Engagement. The results indicated that grade retention was negatively associated with overall student engagement. This negative association was particularly evident in the cases of study behaviors and perceived family support for learning. Moreover, students with a history of retention exhibited a significantly steeper decline in engagement over time compared to their non-retained peers. These findings underscore the importance of developing inclusive educational practices. Strategies that foster student engagement are especially relevant for retained students. Schools need to assume their responsibility in promoting positive academic trajectories for all their students, which may require schools shifting from a materialistic-oriented paradigm to a person-centered school paradigm.
{"title":"Longitudinal Impact of Grade Retention on Student Engagement with School: Challenges to Inclusive Education and to Person-Centered Schools.","authors":"Alberta Sousa, Maria João Rodrigues, Mariana Rodrigues, Nadine Poltz, Angeles Conde-Rodriguez, Paulo A S Moreira","doi":"10.3390/ejihpe15100213","DOIUrl":"10.3390/ejihpe15100213","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The value of grade retention as a pedagogic resource remains a subject of debate because of its costs and benefits. In fact, it has been repeatedly argued that grade retention has substantial psychosocial effects. Student engagement with school is one of the dimensions that is expected to be more affected by grade retention. This article aimed to contribute to this debate by examining the relationship between grade retention and various dimensions of student engagement with school. With that purpose in mind, we analyzed data from a sample at one point in time (cross-sectional) and over three points in time (longitudinal), and expanded their meaning for Inclusive Education and for Person-centered schools. The cross-sectional sample comprised 739 students aged 14 to 19 years (M = 16.47, SD = 0.59), while the longitudinal sample included 238 students aged 11 to 15 years (M = 13.29, SD = 0.54 at the first assessment). Student engagement with school was measured using the Multifactorial Measure of Student Engagement. The results indicated that grade retention was negatively associated with overall student engagement. This negative association was particularly evident in the cases of study behaviors and perceived family support for learning. Moreover, students with a history of retention exhibited a significantly steeper decline in engagement over time compared to their non-retained peers. These findings underscore the importance of developing inclusive educational practices. Strategies that foster student engagement are especially relevant for retained students. Schools need to assume their responsibility in promoting positive academic trajectories for all their students, which may require schools shifting from a materialistic-oriented paradigm to a person-centered school paradigm.</p>","PeriodicalId":30631,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Investigation in Health Psychology and Education","volume":"15 10","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.6,"publicationDate":"2025-10-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12564022/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145393515","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Letizia Lorusso, Nicola Bartolomeo, Maria Elvira Metta, Daphne Gasparre, Patrizia Pignataro, Giulia Caradonna, Paolo Taurisano, Paolo Trerotoli
Personality traits, decision-making styles, and socio-demographic information help understand the characteristics of women requesting voluntary termination of pregnancy (VTP) and monitor the timing and quality of this service However, our current data do not allow for an in-depth exploration of additional, less evident factors that might influence the decision. The aim was to characterise a sample of women requesting VTP in terms of socio-demographic, personality, and decision-making style variables, and to examine the associations among these factors. We conducted a cross-sectional study administering the General Decision-Making Style (GDMS) test, the Big Five Questionnaire (BFQ) and the Personality Inventory for DSM-5 (PID-5) to women requesting VTP certification. BFQ scores were generally high, especially for "Conscientiousness" and "Openness". "Agreeableness" and "Openness" scores were lower in women with low vs. high education (diff = -8.2 [-13.9, -2.4] and diff = -7.5 [-15.0, -0.1]); "Extraversion" was higher in employed women. PID-5 scores for "Detachment" and "Psychoticism" were higher in medium vs. high education (diff = 1.6 [0.05, 3.2] and diff = 1.9 [0.1, 3.8]), but not at pathological level; "Negative affect" was lower in women with children (diff = -1.6 [-3.1, -0.2]). GDMS scores were not associated with socio-demographic factors. "Avoidant" and "Spontaneous" styles were negatively associated with "Conscientiousness" and "Emotional Stability"; "Rational" style was positively associated with "Conscientiousness" and "Disinhibition". High BFQ and low PID-5 scores suggest no personality dysfunction in women undergoing VTP. No predominant decision-making style emerged, but associations between personality traits, decision-making, and socio-demographic factors such as educational level, employment and parity, were observed.
{"title":"Association Between Decision-Making Styles, Personality Traits, and Socio-Demographic Factors in Women Choosing Voluntary Pregnancy Termination: A Cross-Sectional Study.","authors":"Letizia Lorusso, Nicola Bartolomeo, Maria Elvira Metta, Daphne Gasparre, Patrizia Pignataro, Giulia Caradonna, Paolo Taurisano, Paolo Trerotoli","doi":"10.3390/ejihpe15100214","DOIUrl":"10.3390/ejihpe15100214","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Personality traits, decision-making styles, and socio-demographic information help understand the characteristics of women requesting voluntary termination of pregnancy (VTP) and monitor the timing and quality of this service However, our current data do not allow for an in-depth exploration of additional, less evident factors that might influence the decision. The aim was to characterise a sample of women requesting VTP in terms of socio-demographic, personality, and decision-making style variables, and to examine the associations among these factors. We conducted a cross-sectional study administering the General Decision-Making Style (GDMS) test, the Big Five Questionnaire (BFQ) and the Personality Inventory for DSM-5 (PID-5) to women requesting VTP certification. BFQ scores were generally high, especially for \"Conscientiousness\" and \"Openness\". \"Agreeableness\" and \"Openness\" scores were lower in women with low vs. high education (diff = -8.2 [-13.9, -2.4] and diff = -7.5 [-15.0, -0.1]); \"Extraversion\" was higher in employed women. PID-5 scores for \"Detachment\" and \"Psychoticism\" were higher in medium vs. high education (diff = 1.6 [0.05, 3.2] and diff = 1.9 [0.1, 3.8]), but not at pathological level; \"Negative affect\" was lower in women with children (diff = -1.6 [-3.1, -0.2]). GDMS scores were not associated with socio-demographic factors. \"Avoidant\" and \"Spontaneous\" styles were negatively associated with \"Conscientiousness\" and \"Emotional Stability\"; \"Rational\" style was positively associated with \"Conscientiousness\" and \"Disinhibition\". High BFQ and low PID-5 scores suggest no personality dysfunction in women undergoing VTP. No predominant decision-making style emerged, but associations between personality traits, decision-making, and socio-demographic factors such as educational level, employment and parity, were observed.</p>","PeriodicalId":30631,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Investigation in Health Psychology and Education","volume":"15 10","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.6,"publicationDate":"2025-10-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12563433/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145393796","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Alessio Lo Cascio, Elena Sandri, Anna De Benedictis, Anna Marchetti, Giorgia Petrucci, Silvia Dsoke, Gianluca Pucciarelli, Rosaria Alvaro, Maria Grazia De Marinis, Michela Piredda
Background: Perfectionism is a multidimensional personality trait encompassing both adaptive and maladaptive aspects that strongly influence students' psychological health. Spiritual well-being, defined by existential and religious components, has been suggested as a protective factor, yet its relationship with perfectionism remains underexplored in university populations. This study aimed to investigate these associations in a large nationwide sample of Italian undergraduates.
Methods: A total of 2103 students from public and private universities across Northern, Central, and Southern Italy participated in an online cross-sectional survey. Validated instruments were used to assess multidimensional perfectionism and spiritual well-being.
Results: Self-oriented perfectionism emerged as the most prevalent dimension, followed by other-oriented and socially prescribed perfectionism. Scores for existential well-being were higher than those for religious well-being. Existential well-being was negatively associated with socially prescribed perfectionism, suggesting a buffering role against maladaptive forms of striving. Religious well-being showed only a small positive association with perfectionism. Gender and age differences were also observed, with women and younger students reporting higher levels of perfectionism.
Conclusions: Findings highlight existential well-being as a potential protective factor in academic contexts, supporting meaning-centered strategies to mitigate maladaptive perfectionism. Longitudinal and cross-cultural studies are warranted to clarify causal mechanisms and inform culturally sensitive educational and clinical practices.
{"title":"The Impact of Spiritual Well-Being on Multidimensional Perfectionism in University Students: A Nationwide Survey.","authors":"Alessio Lo Cascio, Elena Sandri, Anna De Benedictis, Anna Marchetti, Giorgia Petrucci, Silvia Dsoke, Gianluca Pucciarelli, Rosaria Alvaro, Maria Grazia De Marinis, Michela Piredda","doi":"10.3390/ejihpe15100211","DOIUrl":"10.3390/ejihpe15100211","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Perfectionism is a multidimensional personality trait encompassing both adaptive and maladaptive aspects that strongly influence students' psychological health. Spiritual well-being, defined by existential and religious components, has been suggested as a protective factor, yet its relationship with perfectionism remains underexplored in university populations. This study aimed to investigate these associations in a large nationwide sample of Italian undergraduates.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A total of 2103 students from public and private universities across Northern, Central, and Southern Italy participated in an online cross-sectional survey. Validated instruments were used to assess multidimensional perfectionism and spiritual well-being.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Self-oriented perfectionism emerged as the most prevalent dimension, followed by other-oriented and socially prescribed perfectionism. Scores for existential well-being were higher than those for religious well-being. Existential well-being was negatively associated with socially prescribed perfectionism, suggesting a buffering role against maladaptive forms of striving. Religious well-being showed only a small positive association with perfectionism. Gender and age differences were also observed, with women and younger students reporting higher levels of perfectionism.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Findings highlight existential well-being as a potential protective factor in academic contexts, supporting meaning-centered strategies to mitigate maladaptive perfectionism. Longitudinal and cross-cultural studies are warranted to clarify causal mechanisms and inform culturally sensitive educational and clinical practices.</p>","PeriodicalId":30631,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Investigation in Health Psychology and Education","volume":"15 10","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.6,"publicationDate":"2025-10-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12564579/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145393722","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Shannon L Stewart, Boden D Brock, Abigail Withers, Renee M Guerville, John N Morris, Jeffrey W Poss
(1) Background: Caregivers and families of children involved with mental health services face unique challenges. In Ontario, there is a dearth of information on outcomes for families following a child's involvement with mental health services. Metrics known as Quality Indicators (QIs) offer a way to better understand these outcomes. Importantly, QIs can be risk adjusted to account for the influence of client complexity to allow for fair inter-agency comparisons. This study developed a set of risk-adjusted caregiver/family outcome QIs for children's mental healthcare agencies. (2) Methods: Archival data from widely implemented interRAI child and youth assessment instruments was used. Previous methodology for QI calculation and risk adjustment was adapted and tested. (3) Results: Utilizing the interRAI suite of child and youth assessment instruments, a set of six QIs focusing on improvement or decline in parenting strengths, caregiver distress, and family functioning were developed. (4) Conclusions: The QIs established were sufficiently independent to represent different aspects of family wellbeing while the risk adjustment strategy developed was useful in removing client complexity from QI calculation. Implications for future directions, including the use of QIs at a systems level to more accurately direct resources and set performance benchmarks, are discussed.
{"title":"The Development of Quality Indicators to Assess Family Wellbeing Outcomes Following Engagement with Children's Mental Health Services in Ontario, Canada.","authors":"Shannon L Stewart, Boden D Brock, Abigail Withers, Renee M Guerville, John N Morris, Jeffrey W Poss","doi":"10.3390/ejihpe15100212","DOIUrl":"10.3390/ejihpe15100212","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>(1) Background: Caregivers and families of children involved with mental health services face unique challenges. In Ontario, there is a dearth of information on outcomes for families following a child's involvement with mental health services. Metrics known as Quality Indicators (QIs) offer a way to better understand these outcomes. Importantly, QIs can be risk adjusted to account for the influence of client complexity to allow for fair inter-agency comparisons. This study developed a set of risk-adjusted caregiver/family outcome QIs for children's mental healthcare agencies. (2) Methods: Archival data from widely implemented interRAI child and youth assessment instruments was used. Previous methodology for QI calculation and risk adjustment was adapted and tested. (3) Results: Utilizing the interRAI suite of child and youth assessment instruments, a set of six QIs focusing on improvement or decline in parenting strengths, caregiver distress, and family functioning were developed. (4) Conclusions: The QIs established were sufficiently independent to represent different aspects of family wellbeing while the risk adjustment strategy developed was useful in removing client complexity from QI calculation. Implications for future directions, including the use of QIs at a systems level to more accurately direct resources and set performance benchmarks, are discussed.</p>","PeriodicalId":30631,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Investigation in Health Psychology and Education","volume":"15 10","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.6,"publicationDate":"2025-10-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12564521/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145393637","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
This article updates and extends a prior longitudinal study on adolescents' psychological adjustment during short-term study-abroad programs, analyzing a newly collected larger cohort with the same design and measures. Using the same assessment schedule (pre-departure, mid-sojourn, post-return) with a larger cohort, we confirmed the adequate reliability and longitudinal comparability of the Teacher's Report Form. Mean-level analyses replicated earlier patterns: internalizing symptoms increased during the sojourn and remained elevated at reentry, whereas externalizing problems followed an inverted-U, rising abroad and returning to baseline after return. Person-centered models identified three trajectory classes for both domains: a low-stable group, a transient-elevated group showing a mid-sojourn spike with subsequent recovery, and a small high-persistent group with enduring elevations. Clinical threshold transitions showed a temporary mid-sojourn rise in borderline/clinical cases for both domains, with partial normalization after return. Reliable-change estimates further distinguished transient from sustained change. Together, the findings characterize studying abroad as a moderate, time-bound stressor for most adolescents, with a minority at persistent risk. The implications of these findings include suggestions for front-loaded and reentry supports, pre-departure screening, and targeted mid-sojourn monitoring. The strengths include longitudinal measurement invariance and person-centered modeling; the limitations include teacher-only reports and a short post-return follow-up.
{"title":"Psychopathological Risk During Adolescent Study-Abroad: A Larger-Cohort Update of a Previous Longitudinal Study.","authors":"Silvia Cimino, Luca Cerniglia","doi":"10.3390/ejihpe15100210","DOIUrl":"10.3390/ejihpe15100210","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This article updates and extends a prior longitudinal study on adolescents' psychological adjustment during short-term study-abroad programs, analyzing a newly collected larger cohort with the same design and measures. Using the same assessment schedule (pre-departure, mid-sojourn, post-return) with a larger cohort, we confirmed the adequate reliability and longitudinal comparability of the Teacher's Report Form. Mean-level analyses replicated earlier patterns: internalizing symptoms increased during the sojourn and remained elevated at reentry, whereas externalizing problems followed an inverted-U, rising abroad and returning to baseline after return. Person-centered models identified three trajectory classes for both domains: a low-stable group, a transient-elevated group showing a mid-sojourn spike with subsequent recovery, and a small high-persistent group with enduring elevations. Clinical threshold transitions showed a temporary mid-sojourn rise in borderline/clinical cases for both domains, with partial normalization after return. Reliable-change estimates further distinguished transient from sustained change. Together, the findings characterize studying abroad as a moderate, time-bound stressor for most adolescents, with a minority at persistent risk. The implications of these findings include suggestions for front-loaded and reentry supports, pre-departure screening, and targeted mid-sojourn monitoring. The strengths include longitudinal measurement invariance and person-centered modeling; the limitations include teacher-only reports and a short post-return follow-up.</p>","PeriodicalId":30631,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Investigation in Health Psychology and Education","volume":"15 10","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.6,"publicationDate":"2025-10-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12563814/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145393586","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
The aim of this study was to examine the association between problematic TikTok use and procrastination, loneliness, and self-esteem in Greece. Moreover, we performed a moderation analysis to examine potential moderators such as sex and age. We conducted a cross-sectional study with a convenience sample of 1033 TikTok users. We used the TikTok Addiction Scale to measure problematic TikTok use. Additionally, we measured procrastination, loneliness, and self-esteem with the Irrational Procrastination Scale, the UCLA 3-Item Loneliness Scale, and the Rosenberg Self-Esteem Scale, respectively. We performed moderation analysis using linear regression models. We found a positive association between problematic TikTok use, procrastination, and loneliness. Also, we found a negative association between problematic TikTok use and self-esteem. Moderation analysis showed a more prominent association between problematic TikTok use and procrastination among females and Generation Z. The association between problematic TikTok use and loneliness was stronger among males and Generation X. The association between problematic TikTok use and self-esteem was stronger among males and Generation Z. In conclusion, our study supports the negative effect of problematic TikTok use on users. Moreover, sex and gender are moderators in these associations. However, due to study limitations, further research should be conducted.
{"title":"Association Between Problematic TikTok Use and Procrastination, Loneliness, and Self-Esteem: A Moderation Analysis by Sex and Generation.","authors":"Aglaia Katsiroumpa, Zoe Katsiroumpa, Evmorfia Koukia, Polyxeni Mangoulia, Parisis Gallos, Ioannis Moisoglou, Petros Galanis","doi":"10.3390/ejihpe15100209","DOIUrl":"10.3390/ejihpe15100209","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The aim of this study was to examine the association between problematic TikTok use and procrastination, loneliness, and self-esteem in Greece. Moreover, we performed a moderation analysis to examine potential moderators such as sex and age. We conducted a cross-sectional study with a convenience sample of 1033 TikTok users. We used the TikTok Addiction Scale to measure problematic TikTok use. Additionally, we measured procrastination, loneliness, and self-esteem with the Irrational Procrastination Scale, the UCLA 3-Item Loneliness Scale, and the Rosenberg Self-Esteem Scale, respectively. We performed moderation analysis using linear regression models. We found a positive association between problematic TikTok use, procrastination, and loneliness. Also, we found a negative association between problematic TikTok use and self-esteem. Moderation analysis showed a more prominent association between problematic TikTok use and procrastination among females and Generation Z. The association between problematic TikTok use and loneliness was stronger among males and Generation X. The association between problematic TikTok use and self-esteem was stronger among males and Generation Z. In conclusion, our study supports the negative effect of problematic TikTok use on users. Moreover, sex and gender are moderators in these associations. However, due to study limitations, further research should be conducted.</p>","PeriodicalId":30631,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Investigation in Health Psychology and Education","volume":"15 10","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.6,"publicationDate":"2025-10-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12564733/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145393802","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
The association between patterns of internet use for older adults' well-being is unclear. We examined the association between the frequency and purpose of internet use and subjective well-being in older Japanese adults. We analyzed cross-sectional data from 2343 community-dwelling older adults (aged 65-84 years). Subjective well-being was measured using the World Health Organization Well-Being Index as a continuous score, and internet use was categorized by frequency and purpose. Hierarchical linear regression analysis was controlled for sociodemographic and health-related covariates. After full adjustment, only daily (B = 1.04, 95% CI [0.53, 1.56]) and dual-purpose use (i.e., for both practical and social communication purposes; B = 0.80, 95% CI [0.28, 1.31]) were independently associated with higher well-being. The analysis of the combined patterns further suggested that daily use was the primary factor. For older adults, regularity of internet use was more strongly associated with well-being than diversity of purpose. Daily integration appears to be a key factor for realizing benefits, suggesting that sustained practice is the foundational step in building the digital capital necessary for a flourishing later life. Longitudinal studies are needed to confirm these findings and untangle the causal relationship between sustained internet use and improved well-being among older adults.
{"title":"Association of Internet Use Frequency and Purpose with Subjective Well-Being in Japanese Older Adults: A Cross-Sectional Exploratory Study from the Chofu-Digital-Choju Project.","authors":"Tsubasa Nakada, Kayo Kurotani, Satoshi Seino, Takako Kozawa, Shinichi Murota, Miki Eto, Junko Shimasawa, Yumiko Shimizu, Shinobu Tsurugano, Fuminori Katsukawa, Kazunori Sakamoto, Hironori Washizaki, Yo Ishigaki, Maki Sakamoto, Keiki Takadama, Keiji Yanai, Osamu Matsuo, Chiyoko Kameue, Hitomi Suzuki, Kazunori Ohkawara","doi":"10.3390/ejihpe15100208","DOIUrl":"10.3390/ejihpe15100208","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The association between patterns of internet use for older adults' well-being is unclear. We examined the association between the frequency and purpose of internet use and subjective well-being in older Japanese adults. We analyzed cross-sectional data from 2343 community-dwelling older adults (aged 65-84 years). Subjective well-being was measured using the World Health Organization Well-Being Index as a continuous score, and internet use was categorized by frequency and purpose. Hierarchical linear regression analysis was controlled for sociodemographic and health-related covariates. After full adjustment, only daily (B = 1.04, 95% CI [0.53, 1.56]) and dual-purpose use (i.e., for both practical and social communication purposes; B = 0.80, 95% CI [0.28, 1.31]) were independently associated with higher well-being. The analysis of the combined patterns further suggested that daily use was the primary factor. For older adults, regularity of internet use was more strongly associated with well-being than diversity of purpose. Daily integration appears to be a key factor for realizing benefits, suggesting that sustained practice is the foundational step in building the digital capital necessary for a flourishing later life. Longitudinal studies are needed to confirm these findings and untangle the causal relationship between sustained internet use and improved well-being among older adults.</p>","PeriodicalId":30631,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Investigation in Health Psychology and Education","volume":"15 10","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.6,"publicationDate":"2025-10-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12562976/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145393790","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}