{"title":"The meaning, origin and use of masonry pendentives at the early Christian architecture","authors":"Ivica Marković","doi":"10.5937/a-u0-25841","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.5937/a-u0-25841","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":31335,"journal":{"name":"Arhitektura i Urbanizam","volume":"1 1","pages":"36-48"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2020-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"71203839","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
This paper presents an interview with architect Božidar Manić. The topics of conversation are: the rules for building Serbian Orthodox churches in the 21th century, the relationship between tradition and traditionalism within Orthodox architecture, the influence of the liturgy on the shape of a church, the symbolism of the dome, the development of Serbian sacral architecture, and recommendations for designing modern churches. The talks within the project "Temples about temples" are designed to overcome the current crisis of criteria for building Serbian Orthodox churches, through the cooperation of all participants in the construction of a temple. Through conversations with contemporary architects, the author tries to advance the future creation of ambiences, cities and shrines. The most important conclusions of the conversation with Božidar Manić are: tradition and traditionalism are not the same, there are no binding rules related to the architectural form of a church, the temple space should enable undisturbed worship and the altar must be on the East, separated from the nave.
{"title":"An interview with Božidar Manić about temples","authors":"M. Stanimirovic","doi":"10.5937/A-U0-28739","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.5937/A-U0-28739","url":null,"abstract":"This paper presents an interview with architect Božidar Manić. The topics of conversation are: the rules for building Serbian Orthodox churches in the 21th century, the relationship between tradition and traditionalism within Orthodox architecture, the influence of the liturgy on the shape of a church, the symbolism of the dome, the development of Serbian sacral architecture, and recommendations for designing modern churches. The talks within the project \"Temples about temples\" are designed to overcome the current crisis of criteria for building Serbian Orthodox churches, through the cooperation of all participants in the construction of a temple. Through conversations with contemporary architects, the author tries to advance the future creation of ambiences, cities and shrines. The most important conclusions of the conversation with Božidar Manić are: tradition and traditionalism are not the same, there are no binding rules related to the architectural form of a church, the temple space should enable undisturbed worship and the altar must be on the East, separated from the nave.","PeriodicalId":31335,"journal":{"name":"Arhitektura i Urbanizam","volume":"1 1","pages":"117-127"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2020-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"71203459","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"Exo [global eye(s)]: Dynamic responsive system critical review of the research project, prototype and exhibition concepts","authors":"D. Ćirić","doi":"10.5937/a-u0-25622","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.5937/a-u0-25622","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":31335,"journal":{"name":"Arhitektura i Urbanizam","volume":"1 1","pages":"20-35"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2020-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"71203628","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
The perception of reality is experienced through the senses, where each sense contributes to the way we form our picture of the feeling of comfort. When it comes to the perception of space and spatiality, the most dominant are visual and tactile influences, providing the information that outbalance other senses. A widely accepted opinion in science is that there are several main categories of comfort - visual, thermic, auditory, olfactory and hygienic. In contrast to previously mentioned terms, spatial comfort has not been clearly defined, even though it is one of the key terms when discussing human needs and functionality of space in architecture. Along with being widely used in practice and the fact that a clear scientific determination of this term is still lacking, its use is understood as the equivalent of comfort of a certain space. Our paper analyzed and systematized most significant parameters that can be applied to enable achievement of spatial comfort, which does not necessarily mean that such a spatial comfort will in fact be achieved, as this depends largely on individual perception of a space user. Aiming to clarify the term spatial comfort and determine its precise definition, the main contribution of this paper is the analysis of parameters that can contribute to spatial comfort, as well as reexamination of the thesis that spatial comfort includes the feeling of coziness and content resulting from physical, visual and tactile qualities of a certain space.
{"title":"Parameters of spatial comfort in architecture","authors":"Đorđe Alfirević, Sanja Simonović-Alfirević","doi":"10.5937/A-U0-26940","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.5937/A-U0-26940","url":null,"abstract":"The perception of reality is experienced through the senses, where each sense contributes to the way we form our picture of the feeling of comfort. When it comes to the perception of space and spatiality, the most dominant are visual and tactile influences, providing the information that outbalance other senses. A widely accepted opinion in science is that there are several main categories of comfort - visual, thermic, auditory, olfactory and hygienic. In contrast to previously mentioned terms, spatial comfort has not been clearly defined, even though it is one of the key terms when discussing human needs and functionality of space in architecture. Along with being widely used in practice and the fact that a clear scientific determination of this term is still lacking, its use is understood as the equivalent of comfort of a certain space. Our paper analyzed and systematized most significant parameters that can be applied to enable achievement of spatial comfort, which does not necessarily mean that such a spatial comfort will in fact be achieved, as this depends largely on individual perception of a space user. Aiming to clarify the term spatial comfort and determine its precise definition, the main contribution of this paper is the analysis of parameters that can contribute to spatial comfort, as well as reexamination of the thesis that spatial comfort includes the feeling of coziness and content resulting from physical, visual and tactile qualities of a certain space.","PeriodicalId":31335,"journal":{"name":"Arhitektura i Urbanizam","volume":"1 1","pages":"33-45"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2020-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"71203719","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"Competition practice as a part of planning the Belgrade waterfront renewal in the early 21st century","authors":"Miroslava Petrović-Balubdžić","doi":"10.5937/a-u0-26410","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.5937/a-u0-26410","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":31335,"journal":{"name":"Arhitektura i Urbanizam","volume":"1 1","pages":"49-64"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2020-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"71203694","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"Bauhaus and its reflection on forming of the artistic practices in the ex-Yugoslav cultural region","authors":"Boško Drobnjak, M. Nikolić","doi":"10.5937/a-u0-23898","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.5937/a-u0-23898","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":31335,"journal":{"name":"Arhitektura i Urbanizam","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2019-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"71203170","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
V. Macura, B. Stojkov, J. Cvejić, Jovanka Đorđević-Ciganović, Vera Mihaljević, M. Ferenčak, Nađa Kurtović-Folić, Božidar Stojanović, Zlata Vuksanović-Macura, Dušan Milanović, Dijana Milašinović-Marić
Урбанистичке иновације које су се појавиле у Генералном плану Београда, који је Скупштина града Београда усвојила септембра 2003. год., предмет су овог рада. Приказано је дванаест нових просторних решења која су директно повезана са општим циљевима плана. То су предлози за велике градске пројекте који су креирани током израде Плана 2001–2003. год., а који нису постојали у ранијим генералним плановима из 1951, 1972. и 1985. год., и њиховим ревизијама. Пројекти су били одговор на комплексно економско, социјално и урбанистичко стање Београда настало након распада Југославије. Односили су се на регион града, Ушће, дунавску оријентацију Београда, систем зеленила, трајне вредности града, спонтано грађена насеља, културна добра, градске центре, привредне зоне и животну средину, социјално становање, саобраћај и модерну архитектуру. Чланак су написали урбанисти различитих профила, који су учествовали у изради Генералног плана 2003. год. и који су његови врсни познаваоци. Примарни извори које су аутори користили за анализу били су формални документ публикован у Службеном листу града Београда, као и званични графички прилози Генералног плана објављени на ЦД-РОМ-у. За сваки од приказаних пројеката дати су дефиниција, мотив због кога је креиран и његово урбанистичко решење. Анализа урбанистичких иновација дала је ново разумевање намере тадашњег Београда да град буде темељно обновљен и да отвори нове путеве развоја после трагичних деведесетих година прошлог века, али уз чување сопственог идентитета заснованог на особеностима које га разликују од других европских метропола, а у исто време га чине самосвојним градом.
{"title":"Urban innovations from the 2003 Master Plan: Preserving Belgrade's identity","authors":"V. Macura, B. Stojkov, J. Cvejić, Jovanka Đorđević-Ciganović, Vera Mihaljević, M. Ferenčak, Nađa Kurtović-Folić, Božidar Stojanović, Zlata Vuksanović-Macura, Dušan Milanović, Dijana Milašinović-Marić","doi":"10.5937/a-u0-23981","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.5937/a-u0-23981","url":null,"abstract":"Урбанистичке иновације које су се појавиле у Генералном плану Београда, који је Скупштина града Београда усвојила септембра 2003. год., предмет су овог рада. Приказано је дванаест нових просторних решења која су директно повезана са општим циљевима плана. То су предлози за велике градске пројекте који су креирани током израде Плана 2001–2003. год., а који нису постојали у ранијим генералним плановима из 1951, 1972. и 1985. год., и њиховим ревизијама. Пројекти су били одговор на комплексно економско, социјално и урбанистичко стање Београда настало након распада Југославије. Односили су се на регион града, Ушће, дунавску оријентацију Београда, систем зеленила, трајне вредности града, спонтано грађена насеља, културна добра, градске центре, привредне зоне и животну средину, социјално становање, саобраћај и модерну архитектуру. Чланак су написали урбанисти различитих профила, који су учествовали у изради Генералног плана 2003. год. и који су његови врсни познаваоци. Примарни извори које су аутори користили за анализу били су формални документ публикован у Службеном листу града Београда, као и званични графички прилози Генералног плана објављени на ЦД-РОМ-у. За сваки од приказаних пројеката дати су дефиниција, мотив због кога је креиран и његово урбанистичко решење. Анализа урбанистичких иновација дала је ново разумевање намере тадашњег Београда да град буде темељно обновљен и да отвори нове путеве развоја после трагичних деведесетих година прошлог века, али уз чување сопственог идентитета заснованог на особеностима које га разликују од других европских метропола, а у исто време га чине самосвојним градом.","PeriodicalId":31335,"journal":{"name":"Arhitektura i Urbanizam","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2019-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"71203194","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
* Ivan Filipović, PhD candidate, Faculty of Science and Technology, Keio University (Japan), Department of System Design Engineering, ivan.filipovic@keio.jp Иван Филиповић (1987), докторанд, Факултет науке и технологије, Кеио Универзитет (Јапан), Департман системског инжењерског пројектовања, ivan.filipovic@keio.jp ** dr Dragana Vasiljević Tomić (1964), Associate Professor, Faculty of Architecture, University of Belgrade, Department for Architecture, draganavt@arh.bg.ac.rs др Драгана Васиљевић Томић (1964), ванредни професор, Архитектонски факултет, Универзитет у Београду, Департмант за Архитектуру, draganavt@arh.bg.ac.rs ABSTRACT
{"title":"Soft power architecture: (Un)intentional and incidental in culture relations policies","authors":"Ivana Filipovic, Dragana Vasiljević-Tomić","doi":"10.5937/a-u0-24483","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.5937/a-u0-24483","url":null,"abstract":"* Ivan Filipović, PhD candidate, Faculty of Science and Technology, Keio University (Japan), Department of System Design Engineering, ivan.filipovic@keio.jp Иван Филиповић (1987), докторанд, Факултет науке и технологије, Кеио Универзитет (Јапан), Департман системског инжењерског пројектовања, ivan.filipovic@keio.jp ** dr Dragana Vasiljević Tomić (1964), Associate Professor, Faculty of Architecture, University of Belgrade, Department for Architecture, draganavt@arh.bg.ac.rs др Драгана Васиљевић Томић (1964), ванредни професор, Архитектонски факултет, Универзитет у Београду, Департмант за Архитектуру, draganavt@arh.bg.ac.rs ABSTRACT","PeriodicalId":31335,"journal":{"name":"Arhitektura i Urbanizam","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2019-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"71203238","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Vuk Garača, Svetlana Vukosav, M. Bradic, Jelena Tepavčević
{"title":"Planning, equipment and evaluation of monuments from the World War II in Yugoslavia","authors":"Vuk Garača, Svetlana Vukosav, M. Bradic, Jelena Tepavčević","doi":"10.5937/a-u0-24074","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.5937/a-u0-24074","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":31335,"journal":{"name":"Arhitektura i Urbanizam","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2019-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"71203229","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
京公网安备 11010802042870号
京ICP备2023020795号-1
扫码关注我们
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：