{"title":"Obvietats (o quasi). Filosofia necessària, per Tobies Grimaltos","authors":"Marc Artiga","doi":"10.7203/qfia.8.2.21896","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.7203/qfia.8.2.21896","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":31627,"journal":{"name":"Quaderns de Filosofia","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2021-11-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"41389453","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Resumen: El feminismo contemporáneo debe responder a la pregunta clásica acerca de qué significa ser una mujer con el fin de perfilar los cauces de su nueva andadura. Partiendo de tres tesis que sostiene María Medina-Vicent en su obra Mujeres y discursos gerenciales. Hacia la autogestión feminista me propongo reflexionar sobre el dilema actual, que enfrentan las mujeres, marcado por la dialéctica entre la dimensión individual y la colectiva. Abstract: Contemporary feminism must answer the classic question about what it means to be a woman in order to outline the channels of its new path. Starting at three claims made by María Medina-Vicent in her book Mujeres y discursos gerenciales. Hacia la autogestión feminista, I reflect on the current dilemma, faced by women, with the dialectic between the individual and the collective dimension. Palabras clave: cultura, sexo, género, rol, intimidad, autenticidad, narrativas, estereotipos. Keywords: culture, sex, gender, role, intimacy, authenticity, narratives, stereotypes.
{"title":"Intimidad, autenticidad y estereotipos en los discursos gerenciales dirigidos a mujeres","authors":"Lydia María De Tienda Palop","doi":"10.7203/qfia.8.2.21447","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.7203/qfia.8.2.21447","url":null,"abstract":"Resumen: El feminismo contemporáneo debe responder a la pregunta clásica acerca de qué significa ser una mujer con el fin de perfilar los cauces de su nueva andadura. Partiendo de tres tesis que sostiene María Medina-Vicent en su obra Mujeres y discursos gerenciales. Hacia la autogestión feminista me propongo reflexionar sobre el dilema actual, que enfrentan las mujeres, marcado por la dialéctica entre la dimensión individual y la colectiva. \u0000Abstract: Contemporary feminism must answer the classic question about what it means to be a woman in order to outline the channels of its new path. Starting at three claims made by María Medina-Vicent in her book Mujeres y discursos gerenciales. Hacia la autogestión feminista, I reflect on the current dilemma, faced by women, with the dialectic between the individual and the collective dimension. \u0000Palabras clave: cultura, sexo, género, rol, intimidad, autenticidad, narrativas, estereotipos. \u0000Keywords: culture, sex, gender, role, intimacy, authenticity, narratives, stereotypes.","PeriodicalId":31627,"journal":{"name":"Quaderns de Filosofia","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2021-11-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"47504545","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"Quaderns de filosofia VII, 2","authors":"Quad Fia","doi":"10.7203/qfia.7.2.20342","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.7203/qfia.7.2.20342","url":null,"abstract":"Número complet / Número completo / Full Issue","PeriodicalId":31627,"journal":{"name":"Quaderns de Filosofia","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2021-02-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"46272756","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"Quaderns de filosofia VI, 2","authors":"Quad Fia","doi":"10.7203/qfia.6.2.16146","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.7203/qfia.6.2.16146","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":31627,"journal":{"name":"Quaderns de Filosofia","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2019-11-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"46742581","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"Quaderns de filosofia VI, 1","authors":"Quad Fia","doi":"10.7203/qfia.6.1.15260","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.7203/qfia.6.1.15260","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":31627,"journal":{"name":"Quaderns de Filosofia","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2019-05-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"43915972","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"Pensar problemáticamente. Ensayo sobre Gilles Deleuze, per Julien Canavera.","authors":"Raimon Ribera Añó","doi":"10.7203/QFIA.6.1.14819","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.7203/QFIA.6.1.14819","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":31627,"journal":{"name":"Quaderns de Filosofia","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2019-05-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"43278039","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Holobionts are symbiotic assemblages composed by a host plus its microbiome. The status of holobionts as individuals has recently been a subject of continuous controversy, which has given rise to two main positions: on the one hand, holobiont advocates argue that holobionts are biological individuals; on the other, holobiont detractors argue that they are just mere chimeras or ecological communities, but not individuals. Both parties in the dispute develop their arguments from the framework of the philosophy of biology, in terms of what it takes for a “conglomerate” to be considered an interesting individual from a biological point of view. However, the debates about holobiont individuality have important ontological implications that have remained vaguely explored from a metaphysical framework. The purpose of this paper is to cover that gap by presenting a metaphysical approach to holobionts individuality. Drawing upon a conception of natural selection that puts the focus on the transgenerational recurrence of the traits and that supports the thesis that holobionts are units of selection, we argue that holobionts bear emergent traits and exert downward powers over the entities that compose them. In this vein, we argue, a reasonable argument can be made for conceiving holobionts as emergent biological individuals.
{"title":"A metaphysical approach to holobiont individuality: Holobionts as emergent individuals","authors":"J. Suárez, Vanessa Triviño","doi":"10.7203/QFIA.6.1.14825","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.7203/QFIA.6.1.14825","url":null,"abstract":"Holobionts are symbiotic assemblages composed by a host plus its microbiome. The status of holobionts as individuals has recently been a subject of continuous controversy, which has given rise to two main positions: on the one hand, holobiont advocates argue that holobionts are biological individuals; on the other, holobiont detractors argue that they are just mere chimeras or ecological communities, but not individuals. Both parties in the dispute develop their arguments from the framework of the philosophy of biology, in terms of what it takes for a “conglomerate” to be considered an interesting individual from a biological point of view. However, the debates about holobiont individuality have important ontological implications that have remained vaguely explored from a metaphysical framework. The purpose of this paper is to cover that gap by presenting a metaphysical approach to holobionts individuality. Drawing upon a conception of natural selection that puts the focus on the transgenerational recurrence of the traits and that supports the thesis that holobionts are units of selection, we argue that holobionts bear emergent traits and exert downward powers over the entities that compose them. In this vein, we argue, a reasonable argument can be made for conceiving holobionts as emergent biological individuals.","PeriodicalId":31627,"journal":{"name":"Quaderns de Filosofia","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2019-05-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"49616896","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Abstract: It is commonly assumed that the concept of mechanism is a keytool for the scientific understanding of observable phenomena. However, there is no single definition of mechanism in the current philosophy of science. In fact, philosophers have developed several characterizations of what seemed to be a clear intuitive concept for scientists. In this paper, I will analyze these philosophical conceptions of mechanism, highlighting their problematic aspects and proposing a new mechanistic approach based on the idea that the pertinent levels of organization for a mechanistic explanation can be identified with intervals of quasi-decompositionality. I argue that this approach allows us to consider that activities are directly derived from the entities’ structure. Consequently, a mechanistic explanation implies an arbitrary but not capricious choice of an organizational level. According to this approach, inter-level causation is merely apparent and there is no place for emergent properties. Keywords: mechanisms, emergent properties, quasi-decompositionality, systems.
{"title":"Intervals of quasi-decompositionality and mechanistic explanations","authors":"Emilio Cáceres","doi":"10.7203/QFIA.6.1.14822","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.7203/QFIA.6.1.14822","url":null,"abstract":"Abstract: It is commonly assumed that the concept of mechanism is a keytool for the scientific understanding of observable phenomena. However, there is no single definition of mechanism in the current philosophy of science. In fact, philosophers have developed several characterizations of what seemed to be a clear intuitive concept for scientists. In this paper, I will analyze these philosophical conceptions of mechanism, highlighting their problematic aspects and proposing a new mechanistic approach based on the idea that the pertinent levels of organization for a mechanistic explanation can be identified with intervals of quasi-decompositionality. I argue that this approach allows us to consider that activities are directly derived from the entities’ structure. Consequently, a mechanistic explanation implies an arbitrary but not capricious choice of an organizational level. According to this approach, inter-level causation is merely apparent and there is no place for emergent properties. Keywords: mechanisms, emergent properties, quasi-decompositionality, systems.","PeriodicalId":31627,"journal":{"name":"Quaderns de Filosofia","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2019-05-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"45833027","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Which norms? An approach to the debate on the concept of mental illness Resum: En aquest article realitzem una aproximacio al debat sobre el concepte de malaltia mental, des dels anys cinquanta fins al present, incorporant-hi elements de la filosofia i sociologia de la medicina, i atenent a les seues dimensions organica, subjectiva i social. Perfilem i avaluem les postures naturalistes i normativistes que han conformat el debat sobre la malaltia mental: des de l’antipsiquiatria a la psiquiatria critica, passant per un naturalisme i construccionisme social forts. Paraules clau: malaltia mental, naturalisme, construccionisme, antipsiquiatria, psiquiatria critica. Abstract: In this paper we approach the debate on the concept of mental illness from the 1950s to the present, by incorporating elements from the philosophy and sociology of medicine, considering its bodily, subjective, and social dimensions. We outline and evaluate the naturalist and normativist views that have shaped the debate on mental illness: from antipsychiatry to critical psychiatry, passing through strong naturalism and social constructionism. Keywords: mental illness, naturalism, constructionism, antipsychiatry, critical psychiatry.
{"title":"Quines normes? Una aproximació al debat sobre el concepte de malaltia mental","authors":"V. Ballesteros","doi":"10.7203/QFIA.6.1.14820","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.7203/QFIA.6.1.14820","url":null,"abstract":"Which norms? An approach to the debate on the concept of mental illness Resum: En aquest article realitzem una aproximacio al debat sobre el concepte de malaltia mental, des dels anys cinquanta fins al present, incorporant-hi elements de la filosofia i sociologia de la medicina, i atenent a les seues dimensions organica, subjectiva i social. Perfilem i avaluem les postures naturalistes i normativistes que han conformat el debat sobre la malaltia mental: des de l’antipsiquiatria a la psiquiatria critica, passant per un naturalisme i construccionisme social forts. Paraules clau: malaltia mental, naturalisme, construccionisme, antipsiquiatria, psiquiatria critica. Abstract: In this paper we approach the debate on the concept of mental illness from the 1950s to the present, by incorporating elements from the philosophy and sociology of medicine, considering its bodily, subjective, and social dimensions. We outline and evaluate the naturalist and normativist views that have shaped the debate on mental illness: from antipsychiatry to critical psychiatry, passing through strong naturalism and social constructionism. Keywords: mental illness, naturalism, constructionism, antipsychiatry, critical psychiatry.","PeriodicalId":31627,"journal":{"name":"Quaderns de Filosofia","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2019-05-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"43947941","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
京公网安备 11010802042870号
京ICP备2023020795号-1
扫码关注我们
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：