Pub Date : 1974-03-01DOI: 10.1017/S0080443600001242
J. Watkins
Ultimately, the only good reason for restricting the freedom of responsible adults is to protect other people's freedom, to increase the overall enjoyment of freedom.
最终，限制负责任的成年人的自由的唯一合理理由是保护他人的自由，增加整体自由的享受。
{"title":"Three Views concerning Human Freedom","authors":"J. Watkins","doi":"10.1017/S0080443600001242","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1017/S0080443600001242","url":null,"abstract":"Ultimately, the only good reason for restricting the freedom of responsible adults is to protect other people's freedom, to increase the overall enjoyment of freedom.","PeriodicalId":322312,"journal":{"name":"Royal Institute of Philosophy Lectures","volume":"9 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"1974-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"123192723","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 1974-03-01DOI: 10.1017/S0080443600001187
C. Cherry
Fairly recently, I came upon the following passage in a review of a book by Colin M. Turnbull, called The Mountain People: A child dumped on the ground is seized and eaten by a leopard. The mother is delighted; for not only does she no longer have to carry the child about and feed it, but it follows that there is likely to be a gorged leopard near by, a sleepy animal which can easily be killed and eaten. An old woman who has been abandoned falls down the mountainside because she is blind, so a crowd gathers to laugh at the spectacle of her distress. A man about to die of gunshot wounds makes a last request for tea. As he feebly raises it to his lips, it is snatched from him by his sister, who runs away delighted. A child develops intestinal obstruction; so his father calls in the neighbours to enjoy the joke of his distended belly.
最近，我在科林·m·特恩布尔(Colin M. Turnbull)的《山民》(the Mountain People)一书的书评中看到了以下段落:一个被扔在地上的孩子被一只豹子抓住并吃掉了。母亲很高兴;因为她不仅不再需要带着孩子到处走并喂它，而且很可能附近有一只饱餐一顿的豹子，一只昏昏欲睡的动物，很容易被杀死和吃掉。一个被遗弃的老妇人从山坡上摔了下来，因为她是盲人，所以一群人聚集在一起嘲笑她痛苦的景象。一个即将死于枪伤的人最后一次要茶。当他无力地把它举到嘴边时，他的妹妹从他手中抢走了，她高兴地跑掉了。儿童出现肠梗阻;于是，他的父亲把邻居们叫来，跟他们一起开他大肚子的玩笑。
{"title":"Agreement, Objectivity and the Sentiment of Humanity in Morals","authors":"C. Cherry","doi":"10.1017/S0080443600001187","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1017/S0080443600001187","url":null,"abstract":"Fairly recently, I came upon the following passage in a review of a book by Colin M. Turnbull, called The Mountain People: A child dumped on the ground is seized and eaten by a leopard. The mother is delighted; for not only does she no longer have to carry the child about and feed it, but it follows that there is likely to be a gorged leopard near by, a sleepy animal which can easily be killed and eaten. An old woman who has been abandoned falls down the mountainside because she is blind, so a crowd gathers to laugh at the spectacle of her distress. A man about to die of gunshot wounds makes a last request for tea. As he feebly raises it to his lips, it is snatched from him by his sister, who runs away delighted. A child develops intestinal obstruction; so his father calls in the neighbours to enjoy the joke of his distended belly.","PeriodicalId":322312,"journal":{"name":"Royal Institute of Philosophy Lectures","volume":"72 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"1974-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"116745940","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 1974-03-01DOI: 10.1017/S0080443600001175
T. Honderich
Just about all political philosophy of the recommending kind is factless and presumptuous. That it has an honest intellectual use, which it does, and which of course is different from its use as reassurance and the like, is only to be explained by the want of something better.
{"title":"On Inequality and Violence, and the Differences we make between them","authors":"T. Honderich","doi":"10.1017/S0080443600001175","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1017/S0080443600001175","url":null,"abstract":"Just about all political philosophy of the recommending kind is factless and presumptuous. That it has an honest intellectual use, which it does, and which of course is different from its use as reassurance and the like, is only to be explained by the want of something better.","PeriodicalId":322312,"journal":{"name":"Royal Institute of Philosophy Lectures","volume":"8 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"1974-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"128985239","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 1973-12-31DOI: 10.1017/S008044360001116X
With the exception of the philosophical terms 'family resemblance', 'intentionality' and 'ostensive', the explanations of which are supplied by the Editor, the terms in this Glossary are ones used in linguistics, and they are explained by David Crystal, Professor of Linguistic Science at the University of Reading. The numbers in parentheses are pagereferences of occurrences of the term in this volume.
{"title":"Glossary","authors":"","doi":"10.1017/S008044360001116X","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1017/S008044360001116X","url":null,"abstract":"With the exception of the philosophical terms 'family resemblance', 'intentionality' and 'ostensive', the explanations of which are supplied by the Editor, the terms in this Glossary are ones used in linguistics, and they are explained by David Crystal, Professor of Linguistic Science at the University of Reading. The numbers in parentheses are pagereferences of occurrences of the term in this volume.","PeriodicalId":322312,"journal":{"name":"Royal Institute of Philosophy Lectures","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"1973-12-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"122267220","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"List of Abbreviations","authors":"Steve Bolger, P. Corrigan, I. Gough, E. Mcleod","doi":"10.2307/j.ctv16b77k9.5","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctv16b77k9.5","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":322312,"journal":{"name":"Royal Institute of Philosophy Lectures","volume":"07 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"1973-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"127137689","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 1973-03-01DOI: 10.1017/S0080443600000261
B. Mcguinness
I take as my text propostion 4.0312 of the Tractatus: The possibility of propositions is based on the principle that objects have signs as their representatives. My fundamental idea is that the ‘logical constants’ are not representatives; that there can be no representatives of the logic of facts. Practically the same words occur (with two additional sentences) in Wittgenstein's Notebook for 25 December 1914, where Miss Anscombe translates them: The possibility of the proposition is, of course, founded on the principle of signs as going proxy for objects. Thus in the proposition something has something else as its proxy. But there is also the common cement. My fundamental thought is that the logical constants are not proxies. That the logic of the fact cannot have anything as its proxy.
{"title":"The Grundgedanke of the Tractatus","authors":"B. Mcguinness","doi":"10.1017/S0080443600000261","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1017/S0080443600000261","url":null,"abstract":"I take as my text propostion 4.0312 of the Tractatus: The possibility of propositions is based on the principle that objects have signs as their representatives. My fundamental idea is that the ‘logical constants’ are not representatives; that there can be no representatives of the logic of facts. Practically the same words occur (with two additional sentences) in Wittgenstein's Notebook for 25 December 1914, where Miss Anscombe translates them: The possibility of the proposition is, of course, founded on the principle of signs as going proxy for objects. Thus in the proposition something has something else as its proxy. But there is also the common cement. My fundamental thought is that the logical constants are not proxies. That the logic of the fact cannot have anything as its proxy.","PeriodicalId":322312,"journal":{"name":"Royal Institute of Philosophy Lectures","volume":"45 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"1973-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"124551043","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 1973-03-01DOI: 10.1017/S0080443600000285
David R. Cerbone
Tractatus, 5.62 famously says: ‘… what the solipsist means is quite correct; only it cannot be said but makes itself manifest. The world is my world: this is manifest in the fact that the limits of language (of that language which alone I understand) mean the limits of my world.’ The later part of this repeats what was said in summary at 5.6: ‘the limits of my language mean the limits of my world’. And the key to the problem ‘how much truth there is in solipsism’ has been provided by the reflections of TLP, 5.61.
{"title":"Wittgenstein and Idealism","authors":"David R. Cerbone","doi":"10.1017/S0080443600000285","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1017/S0080443600000285","url":null,"abstract":"Tractatus, 5.62 famously says: ‘… what the solipsist means is quite correct; only it cannot be said but makes itself manifest. The world is my world: this is manifest in the fact that the limits of language (of that language which alone I understand) mean the limits of my world.’ The later part of this repeats what was said in summary at 5.6: ‘the limits of my language mean the limits of my world’. And the key to the problem ‘how much truth there is in solipsism’ has been provided by the reflections of TLP, 5.61.","PeriodicalId":322312,"journal":{"name":"Royal Institute of Philosophy Lectures","volume":"2 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"1973-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"122070827","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Wittgenstein's book On Certainty which was first published in 1969, eighteen years after his death, is a collection of notes which he composed during the last eighteen months of his life. As his editors explain in their preface, these notes, which were written at four different periods, are all in the form of a first draft. They are more repetitive than they no doubt would have been if Wittgenstein had been able to revise them. Even so, they are characteristically succinct and penetrating, and the argument which they develop is easier to follow than that of the general run of Wittgenstein's later work.
{"title":"Wittgenstein on Certainty","authors":"C. Wenzel","doi":"10.2307/j.ctv25gm86n.6","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctv25gm86n.6","url":null,"abstract":"Wittgenstein's book On Certainty which was first published in 1969, eighteen years after his death, is a collection of notes which he composed during the last eighteen months of his life. As his editors explain in their preface, these notes, which were written at four different periods, are all in the form of a first draft. They are more repetitive than they no doubt would have been if Wittgenstein had been able to revise them. Even so, they are characteristically succinct and penetrating, and the argument which they develop is easier to follow than that of the general run of Wittgenstein's later work.","PeriodicalId":322312,"journal":{"name":"Royal Institute of Philosophy Lectures","volume":"17 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"1973-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"126859053","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 1973-03-01DOI: 10.1017/s0080443600000388
{"title":"Index of References to Wittgenstein's Works","authors":"","doi":"10.1017/s0080443600000388","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1017/s0080443600000388","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":322312,"journal":{"name":"Royal Institute of Philosophy Lectures","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"1973-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"132396737","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
京公网安备 11010802042870号
京ICP备2023020795号-1
扫码关注我们
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：