Pub Date : 2025-11-14eCollection Date: 2025-12-01DOI: 10.1002/pro6.70031
Ling Zhou, Yuming Chen, Meng Peng, Xiumao Yin, Huanqing Liang, Jieming Mo, Wan Zhang, Zhigang Liu
Boron neutron capture therapy (BNCT) combines boron drug delivery and heavy-ion therapy. The key factors in the application of BNCT are high-quality neutron beams and boron-containing compounds. It can be used to treat gliomas, meningiomas, melanomas, and recurrent head and neck cancers. To promote the research and development of accelerator-based neutron sources, increase the tumor targeting capability of boron drugs, and improve BNCT efficacy in treating malignancies, this review provides an overview of the development of boron-containing compounds and the progress made in clinical studies using BNCT.
{"title":"Clinical application of boron neutron capture therapy for cancer treatment: A systematic review.","authors":"Ling Zhou, Yuming Chen, Meng Peng, Xiumao Yin, Huanqing Liang, Jieming Mo, Wan Zhang, Zhigang Liu","doi":"10.1002/pro6.70031","DOIUrl":"10.1002/pro6.70031","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Boron neutron capture therapy (BNCT) combines boron drug delivery and heavy-ion therapy. The key factors in the application of BNCT are high-quality neutron beams and boron-containing compounds. It can be used to treat gliomas, meningiomas, melanomas, and recurrent head and neck cancers. To promote the research and development of accelerator-based neutron sources, increase the tumor targeting capability of boron drugs, and improve BNCT efficacy in treating malignancies, this review provides an overview of the development of boron-containing compounds and the progress made in clinical studies using BNCT.</p>","PeriodicalId":32406,"journal":{"name":"Precision Radiation Oncology","volume":"9 4","pages":"304-313"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1,"publicationDate":"2025-11-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12750318/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145879105","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-09-17eCollection Date: 2025-09-01DOI: 10.1002/pro6.70029
Weixing Ji, Tao Jiang, Zhihan Chen, Gang Chen, Yang Zhang, Shisuo Du
Purpose: This study aimed to investigate the dose dependency of asymptomatic radiation pneumonitis (aRP) in patients with lung cancer following radiotherapy, focusing on the predictive value of dosimetric parameters.
Methods: This study included 72 patients with primary lung cancer who underwent radiotherapy between January 2019 and June 2022. The patients were divided into an aRP group (n = 30) and a non-RP group (n = 42). The physical dose was converted to an equivalent dose using the Linear-Quadratic (LQ) model, with an α/β value of 3. Three lung structures were defined, and the corresponding dose-volume histogram parameters were collected. The Mann-Whitney U test was used to compare dose parameters between the two groups, and multivariate logistic regression was performed to remove correlations among different parameters. A logistic function and receiver operating characteristic curve were constructed to predict aRP. This study analyzed the impact of different clinical characteristics on the aRP incidence.
Results: The lungs-planning target volume (PTV) V15(Gy) was ultimately identified as the best predictive parameter. Significant dose-response relationships were observed, with V15(Gy) achieving an area under the curve of 0.666 ± 0.067 (P = 0.017). The optimal cutoff value for lungs-PTV V15(Gy) was 21.1%, below which the incidence of aRP decreased significantly. Immunotherapy has been identified as an independent risk factor for aRP.
Conclusion: The occurrence of aRP in patients with lung cancer after radiotherapy has a clear dose dependency, with lungs-PTV, V15(Gy) being the best dose parameter for prediction, and the optimal cutoff value based on this study was 21.1%.
{"title":"V<sub>15(Gy)</sub> as a predictor of asymptomatic radiation pneumonitis in patients with lung cancer: A retrospective dosimetric analysis.","authors":"Weixing Ji, Tao Jiang, Zhihan Chen, Gang Chen, Yang Zhang, Shisuo Du","doi":"10.1002/pro6.70029","DOIUrl":"10.1002/pro6.70029","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>This study aimed to investigate the dose dependency of asymptomatic radiation pneumonitis (aRP) in patients with lung cancer following radiotherapy, focusing on the predictive value of dosimetric parameters.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This study included 72 patients with primary lung cancer who underwent radiotherapy between January 2019 and June 2022. The patients were divided into an aRP group (<i>n</i> = 30) and a non-RP group (<i>n</i> = 42). The physical dose was converted to an equivalent dose using the Linear-Quadratic (LQ) model, with an α/β value of 3. Three lung structures were defined, and the corresponding dose-volume histogram parameters were collected. The Mann-Whitney U test was used to compare dose parameters between the two groups, and multivariate logistic regression was performed to remove correlations among different parameters. A logistic function and receiver operating characteristic curve were constructed to predict aRP. This study analyzed the impact of different clinical characteristics on the aRP incidence.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The lungs-planning target volume (PTV) V<sub>15(Gy)</sub> was ultimately identified as the best predictive parameter. Significant dose-response relationships were observed, with V<sub>15(Gy)</sub> achieving an area under the curve of 0.666 ± 0.067 (<i>P</i> = 0.017). The optimal cutoff value for lungs-PTV V<sub>15(Gy)</sub> was 21.1%, below which the incidence of aRP decreased significantly. Immunotherapy has been identified as an independent risk factor for aRP.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The occurrence of aRP in patients with lung cancer after radiotherapy has a clear dose dependency, with lungs-PTV, V<sub>15(Gy)</sub> being the best dose parameter for prediction, and the optimal cutoff value based on this study was 21.1%.</p>","PeriodicalId":32406,"journal":{"name":"Precision Radiation Oncology","volume":"9 3","pages":"185-191"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1,"publicationDate":"2025-09-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12559912/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145402131","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Central nervous system (CNS) involvement in peripheral T-cell lymphoma (PTCL) is rare and is associated with poor prognosis. This report presents two pathologically confirmed PTCL cases. Although cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) flow cytometry did not detect tumor cells, CSF analysis revealed significantly elevated interleukin (IL)-10 levels and an increased IL-10/IL-6 ratio, suggesting CNS involvement. Following effective chemotherapy, which crossed the blood-brain barrier, IL-10 levels and the IL-10/IL-6 ratio decreased significantly, with clinical improvement. These findings suggest that IL-10 is a valuable supplementary diagnostic marker for CNS involvement in PTCL. Whole-brain radiation therapy, as a consolidative treatment, may be effective for residual or refractory lesions and improve prognosis. We review these patients' clinical and diagnostic features and discuss the role of radiotherapy in the treatment of CNS involvement in PTCL.
{"title":"Peripheral T-cell lymphoma with central nervous system involvement and elevated interleukin-10 levels in the cerebrospinal fluid: A case report.","authors":"Xin Wang, Haichen Wei, Dan Liu, Hui Wang, Zengjun Li, Lijie Xing","doi":"10.1002/pro6.70018","DOIUrl":"10.1002/pro6.70018","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Central nervous system (CNS) involvement in peripheral T-cell lymphoma (PTCL) is rare and is associated with poor prognosis. This report presents two pathologically confirmed PTCL cases. Although cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) flow cytometry did not detect tumor cells, CSF analysis revealed significantly elevated interleukin (IL)-10 levels and an increased IL-10/IL-6 ratio, suggesting CNS involvement. Following effective chemotherapy, which crossed the blood-brain barrier, IL-10 levels and the IL-10/IL-6 ratio decreased significantly, with clinical improvement. These findings suggest that IL-10 is a valuable supplementary diagnostic marker for CNS involvement in PTCL. Whole-brain radiation therapy, as a consolidative treatment, may be effective for residual or refractory lesions and improve prognosis. We review these patients' clinical and diagnostic features and discuss the role of radiotherapy in the treatment of CNS involvement in PTCL.</p>","PeriodicalId":32406,"journal":{"name":"Precision Radiation Oncology","volume":"9 3","pages":"223-227"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1,"publicationDate":"2025-08-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12559901/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145402163","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Purpose: Multi-field intensity-modulated proton therapy (IMPT) is a novel treatment protocol design method proposed to reduce range uncertainty. This study aimed to investigate whether multi-field IMPT has a dose distribution advantage over photon intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) and CyberKnife in stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) for stage I non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC).
Methods: Twenty-nine patients who underwent photon SBRT from February 2021 to September 2022 at Shandong Cancer Hospital were included. Their Computed Tomography (CT) images were used to design CyberKnife and multi-field IMPT plans. For the photon plan (IMRT and CyberKnife), the planning target volume (PTV), which was extended from the internal gross target volume (IGTV), was prescribed at 50 Gy. For the proton plans, the planning beam-specific target volume (PBSTV) based on the IGTV was created to meet the same area as the photon PTV. Multi-field IMPT was simulated by adding additional beam angles to conventional IMPT. Dose distribution assessment factors included Dmean and dose gradient index (GI) for PTV/PBSTV, and Dmean and the hottest 0.1 cm3 dose (D0.1cc) for organs at risk (OARs).
Results: With each patient receiving 7-11 beams, multi-field IMPT had a better target GI than IMRT. For the lung, heart, spinal cord, chest wall, and ribs doses, the Dmean of the multi-field IMPT was smaller than that of the other two plans for all metrics. CyberKnife was significantly less protective of the OARs than the other two planning modalities, owing to the presence of a high target center dose.
Conclusion: Multi-field IMPT achieves favorable target coverage and OAR protection compared to IMRT and CyberKnife for SBRT of NSCLC.
{"title":"Exploring the potential benefits of multi-field IMPT for stage I NSCLC SBRT: An in silico dosimetric comparison to IMRT and CyberKnife.","authors":"ZhangMing Chen, Xianrui Yan, Shu Xie, Pinjing Cheng, Dong Xiang, Cheng Tao, Qingtao Qiu, Tengxiang Li, Chengqiang Li, Huazhong Shu, Antoine Simon, Jian Zhu","doi":"10.1002/pro6.70027","DOIUrl":"10.1002/pro6.70027","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Multi-field intensity-modulated proton therapy (IMPT) is a novel treatment protocol design method proposed to reduce range uncertainty. This study aimed to investigate whether multi-field IMPT has a dose distribution advantage over photon intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) and CyberKnife in stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) for stage I non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Twenty-nine patients who underwent photon SBRT from February 2021 to September 2022 at Shandong Cancer Hospital were included. Their Computed Tomography (CT) images were used to design CyberKnife and multi-field IMPT plans. For the photon plan (IMRT and CyberKnife), the planning target volume (PTV), which was extended from the internal gross target volume (IGTV), was prescribed at 50 Gy. For the proton plans, the planning beam-specific target volume (PBSTV) based on the IGTV was created to meet the same area as the photon PTV. Multi-field IMPT was simulated by adding additional beam angles to conventional IMPT. Dose distribution assessment factors included D<sub>mean</sub> and dose gradient index (GI) for PTV/PBSTV, and D<sub>mean</sub> and the hottest 0.1 cm<sup>3</sup> dose (D<sub>0.1cc</sub>) for organs at risk (OARs).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>With each patient receiving 7-11 beams, multi-field IMPT had a better target GI than IMRT. For the lung, heart, spinal cord, chest wall, and ribs doses, the D<sub>mean</sub> of the multi-field IMPT was smaller than that of the other two plans for all metrics. CyberKnife was significantly less protective of the OARs than the other two planning modalities, owing to the presence of a high target center dose.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Multi-field IMPT achieves favorable target coverage and OAR protection compared to IMRT and CyberKnife for SBRT of NSCLC.</p>","PeriodicalId":32406,"journal":{"name":"Precision Radiation Oncology","volume":"9 3","pages":"156-166"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1,"publicationDate":"2025-08-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12559922/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145402128","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-08-24eCollection Date: 2025-09-01DOI: 10.1002/pro6.70028
Abhay Kumar Singh, Anuj Vijay, Manindra Bhushan
Purpose: To systematically compare the dosimetric performance of conventional (Ray Tracing, AAA) and advanced (Monte Carlo, Acuros XB) dose calculation algorithms across homogeneous and heterogeneous tissues in stereotactic radiotherapy (SRT) and stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT).
Methods: A retrospective analysis of 125 SRT cases (brain: 50, lung: 20, liver: 20, spine: 35) was conducted using CyberKnife and Varian systems. Plans were originally created using Type B (Anisotropic Analytical Algorithm [AAA] and Ray Tracing) algorithms and were subsequently recalculated using Type C (Acuros XB and Monte Carlo) algorithms, while maintaining identical beam geometry and monitor units. Dosimetric parameters (D95%, Dmean, Dmax, CI, HI, GI) were evaluated. Validation included point dose measurements with Cheese Phantom and gamma index analysis using the PTW 1600 SRS Phantom.
Results: In lung cases, Type B algorithms overestimated D95% by 14% compared to Monte Carlo, which reduced Dmean by 13.7% and CI by 25.8%. In liver, Acuros XB lowered Dmean by 21.4% with a 0.8% CI reduction. For spine, Monte Carlo reduced D95% by 3.4%, with a 1.1% drop in Dmean and stable CI. Brain cases showed minimal differences, with Monte Carlo increasing CI by 2.5% (1.19 vs. 1.16). Gamma pass rates exceeded 98% for Monte Carlo and Acuros XB, surpassing Ray Tracing and AAA (≤96%).
Conclusion: Advanced algorithms demonstrated superior dose accuracy, homogeneity, and organs at risk (OAR) sparing in heterogeneous anatomical regions. Despite higher computational requirements, their clinical implementation is justified for SRT/SBRT planning. This study supports a site-specific approach, advocating for advanced algorithm use in anatomically complex scenarios.
{"title":"Dosimetric assessment of conventional and advanced algorithms in clinical stereotactic radiotherapy.","authors":"Abhay Kumar Singh, Anuj Vijay, Manindra Bhushan","doi":"10.1002/pro6.70028","DOIUrl":"10.1002/pro6.70028","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To systematically compare the dosimetric performance of conventional (Ray Tracing, AAA) and advanced (Monte Carlo, Acuros XB) dose calculation algorithms across homogeneous and heterogeneous tissues in stereotactic radiotherapy (SRT) and stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A retrospective analysis of 125 SRT cases (brain: 50, lung: 20, liver: 20, spine: 35) was conducted using CyberKnife and Varian systems. Plans were originally created using Type B (Anisotropic Analytical Algorithm [AAA] and Ray Tracing) algorithms and were subsequently recalculated using Type C (Acuros XB and Monte Carlo) algorithms, while maintaining identical beam geometry and monitor units. Dosimetric parameters (D<sub>95%</sub>, D<sub>mean</sub>, D<sub>max</sub>, CI, HI, GI) were evaluated. Validation included point dose measurements with Cheese Phantom and gamma index analysis using the PTW 1600 SRS Phantom.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In lung cases, Type B algorithms overestimated D<sub>95%</sub> by 14% compared to Monte Carlo, which reduced D<sub>mean</sub> by 13.7% and CI by 25.8%. In liver, Acuros XB lowered D<sub>mean</sub> by 21.4% with a 0.8% CI reduction. For spine, Monte Carlo reduced D<sub>95%</sub> by 3.4%, with a 1.1% drop in D<sub>mean</sub> and stable CI. Brain cases showed minimal differences, with Monte Carlo increasing CI by 2.5% (1.19 vs. 1.16). Gamma pass rates exceeded 98% for Monte Carlo and Acuros XB, surpassing Ray Tracing and AAA (≤96%).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Advanced algorithms demonstrated superior dose accuracy, homogeneity, and organs at risk (OAR) sparing in heterogeneous anatomical regions. Despite higher computational requirements, their clinical implementation is justified for SRT/SBRT planning. This study supports a site-specific approach, advocating for advanced algorithm use in anatomically complex scenarios.</p>","PeriodicalId":32406,"journal":{"name":"Precision Radiation Oncology","volume":"9 3","pages":"192-201"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1,"publicationDate":"2025-08-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12559905/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145402171","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Objective: Radiation recall pneumonitis (RRP) is a localized inflammatory reaction occurring in previously irradiated lung regions, typically triggered by certain anticancer agents. In clinical settings, we have observed that COVID-19 infection may also act as a precipitating factor for RRP. However, its true incidence and possible risk factors remain poorly defined.
Methods: Lung cancer patients who received radiotherapy and were diagnosed with COVID-19 between November 2022 and February 2023 were included. RRP was defined as pulmonary changes limited to the previously irradiated regions, occurring at least 6 months after radiotherapy. Patients medical records and radiation dose distribution data were analyzed to identify potential contributing factors to RRP.
Results: The study included 140 patients who underwent thoracic radiotherapy with a minimum six-month interval before COVID-19 diagnosis. Among these, 62 patients (44.2%) developed RRP, and 45% of these experienced grade ≥ 2 pneumonitis. No radiotherapy dose-related factors were significantly associated with RRP. However, statistical analysis showed that RRP incidence was significantly associated with baseline T-stage (P = 0.034) and the time interval from radiotherapy completion to COVID-19 infection (P < 0.001).
Conclusions: A 44.2% incidence of COVID-19-related RRP was identified, which is notably higher than previously reported. While radiotherapy dosimetry did not correlate with RRP risk, baseline T-stage and timing of COVID-19 infection after radiotherapy were significantly associated with its occurrence.
{"title":"Incidence, risk factors, and CT characteristics of radiation recall pneumonitis induced by COVID-19 infection in lung cancer.","authors":"Wenhua Yun, Junxu Wen, Xueying Zhai, Xiaoyan Yin, Xiangjiao Meng","doi":"10.1002/pro6.70025","DOIUrl":"10.1002/pro6.70025","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Radiation recall pneumonitis (RRP) is a localized inflammatory reaction occurring in previously irradiated lung regions, typically triggered by certain anticancer agents. In clinical settings, we have observed that COVID-19 infection may also act as a precipitating factor for RRP. However, its true incidence and possible risk factors remain poorly defined.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Lung cancer patients who received radiotherapy and were diagnosed with COVID-19 between November 2022 and February 2023 were included. RRP was defined as pulmonary changes limited to the previously irradiated regions, occurring at least 6 months after radiotherapy. Patients medical records and radiation dose distribution data were analyzed to identify potential contributing factors to RRP.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The study included 140 patients who underwent thoracic radiotherapy with a minimum six-month interval before COVID-19 diagnosis. Among these, 62 patients (44.2%) developed RRP, and 45% of these experienced grade ≥ 2 pneumonitis. No radiotherapy dose-related factors were significantly associated with RRP. However, statistical analysis showed that RRP incidence was significantly associated with baseline T-stage (<i>P</i> = 0.034) and the time interval from radiotherapy completion to COVID-19 infection (<i>P</i> < 0.001).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>A 44.2% incidence of COVID-19-related RRP was identified, which is notably higher than previously reported. While radiotherapy dosimetry did not correlate with RRP risk, baseline T-stage and timing of COVID-19 infection after radiotherapy were significantly associated with its occurrence.</p>","PeriodicalId":32406,"journal":{"name":"Precision Radiation Oncology","volume":"9 3","pages":"177-184"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1,"publicationDate":"2025-08-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12559899/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145402134","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Purpose: This study evaluated the geometric and dosimetric uncertainties during online adaptive radiotherapy (ART) for prostate cancer.
Methods: Sequential cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) scans from 52 sessions involving 13 patients were analyzed. An ART plan was generated using CBCT1, followed by a verification scan (CBCT2) acquired 13.1 ± 3.0 minutes before treatment delivery. New contours (prostate, seminal vesicles, bladder, rectum, and bowel) were delineated on CBCT2 and transferred to CBCT1 for dose distribution analysis. Three dimensional contour variations were quantified, new planning target volume (PTV) margins were calculated, and their dosimetric benefits were assessed.
Results: No significant differences were observed in the high-dose volumes (V60 Gy and V57 Gy) of the bladder and rectum (P > 0.05). PTV margins were 2.6 mm, 2.4 mm, and 2.6 mm in the lateral, vertical, and longitudinal directions for the prostate, and 3.9 mm, 3.8 mm, and 4.3 mm for the seminal vesicles, respectively. These margin reductions led to a 37% reduction in the dose to the surrounding critical organs, while maintaining consistent target coverage.
Conclusion: This study supports symmetric PTV margins of 3 mm for the prostate and 4.5 mm for the seminal vesicles in online ART, thereby contributing to the development of optimized treatment strategies for prostate cancer.
{"title":"Evaluating intra-fraction motion and its dosimetric impact in ethos online adaptive radiotherapy for prostate cancer.","authors":"Yoganathan Sa, Ahamed Basith, Rajeev Choudary Apsani, Venkada Manickam Gurusamy, Amine Khemissi, Satheesh Paloor, Saju Divakar, Sarah McCabe, Rabih Hammoud, Noora Al-Hammadi","doi":"10.1002/pro6.70013","DOIUrl":"10.1002/pro6.70013","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>This study evaluated the geometric and dosimetric uncertainties during online adaptive radiotherapy (ART) for prostate cancer.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Sequential cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) scans from 52 sessions involving 13 patients were analyzed. An ART plan was generated using CBCT1, followed by a verification scan (CBCT2) acquired 13.1 ± 3.0 minutes before treatment delivery. New contours (prostate, seminal vesicles, bladder, rectum, and bowel) were delineated on CBCT2 and transferred to CBCT1 for dose distribution analysis. Three dimensional contour variations were quantified, new planning target volume (PTV) margins were calculated, and their dosimetric benefits were assessed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>No significant differences were observed in the high-dose volumes (V60 Gy and V57 Gy) of the bladder and rectum (<i>P</i> > 0.05). PTV margins were 2.6 mm, 2.4 mm, and 2.6 mm in the lateral, vertical, and longitudinal directions for the prostate, and 3.9 mm, 3.8 mm, and 4.3 mm for the seminal vesicles, respectively. These margin reductions led to a 37% reduction in the dose to the surrounding critical organs, while maintaining consistent target coverage.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This study supports symmetric PTV margins of 3 mm for the prostate and 4.5 mm for the seminal vesicles in online ART, thereby contributing to the development of optimized treatment strategies for prostate cancer.</p>","PeriodicalId":32406,"journal":{"name":"Precision Radiation Oncology","volume":"9 3","pages":"202-209"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1,"publicationDate":"2025-08-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12559917/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145402187","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-08-04eCollection Date: 2025-09-01DOI: 10.1002/pro6.70026
Zhaoning Wang, Linlin Wang
{"title":"Comments on \"On the significance of peak dose in normal tissue toxicity in spatially fractionated radiotherapy: The case of proton minibeam radiation therapy\".","authors":"Zhaoning Wang, Linlin Wang","doi":"10.1002/pro6.70026","DOIUrl":"10.1002/pro6.70026","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":32406,"journal":{"name":"Precision Radiation Oncology","volume":"9 3","pages":"221-222"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1,"publicationDate":"2025-08-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12559893/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145402082","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-08-04eCollection Date: 2025-09-01DOI: 10.1002/pro6.70023
[This corrects the article DOI: 10.1002/pro6.70000.].
[更正文章DOI: 10.1002/pro6.70000.]。
{"title":"Correction to \"Multi-sequence MRI-based clinical-radiomics models for the preoperative prediction of microsatellite instability-high status in endometrial cancer\".","authors":"","doi":"10.1002/pro6.70023","DOIUrl":"10.1002/pro6.70023","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>[This corrects the article DOI: 10.1002/pro6.70000.].</p>","PeriodicalId":32406,"journal":{"name":"Precision Radiation Oncology","volume":"9 3","pages":"228"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1,"publicationDate":"2025-08-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12559911/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145402167","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Proton beam therapy has demonstrated significant clinical efficacy across multiple malignancies, primarily attributed to its distinct physical dose deposition characteristics. However, clinical implementation remains constrained by resource limitations and accumulated experience, particularly regarding radiation tolerance thresholds for organs at risk (OARs). Unlike photon-based radiotherapy where consensus guidelines like QUANTEC have been established, standardized dose constraints for proton therapy require further validation. This systematic review synthesizes decade-long evidence from peer-reviewed literature and clinical guidelines, critically evaluating current understanding of OARs tolerance in proton therapy. The comprehensive analysis aims to inform clinical decision-making and protocol development for emerging proton therapy.
{"title":"Clinical advances and challenges in dose constraints for organs at risk in proton therapy: A systematic review of the last decade's literature.","authors":"Jinghao Duan, Cheng Tao, Shizhang Wu, Chengqiang Li, Jinhu Chen, Tianyuan Dai, Yunyi Fan, Tong Bai, Xiangjuan Meng, Tian Kong, Jian Zhu","doi":"10.1002/pro6.70020","DOIUrl":"10.1002/pro6.70020","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Proton beam therapy has demonstrated significant clinical efficacy across multiple malignancies, primarily attributed to its distinct physical dose deposition characteristics. However, clinical implementation remains constrained by resource limitations and accumulated experience, particularly regarding radiation tolerance thresholds for organs at risk (OARs). Unlike photon-based radiotherapy where consensus guidelines like QUANTEC have been established, standardized dose constraints for proton therapy require further validation. This systematic review synthesizes decade-long evidence from peer-reviewed literature and clinical guidelines, critically evaluating current understanding of OARs tolerance in proton therapy. The comprehensive analysis aims to inform clinical decision-making and protocol development for emerging proton therapy.</p>","PeriodicalId":32406,"journal":{"name":"Precision Radiation Oncology","volume":"9 3","pages":"210-220"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1,"publicationDate":"2025-07-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12559902/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145402074","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}