Pub Date : 2024-06-12DOI: 10.1016/j.ijnsa.2024.100213
Background
Through their expertise and diverse skills, Parkinson Nurses are key care providers for people with Parkinson's disease. They are seen as an important profession for person-centered and multidisciplinary care, considered priorities in Parkinson's care delivery. Currently, however, little is known about the priorities that this profession itself defines for the care of Parkinson's patients and how they perceive their own role in the care process.
Objective
To explore the perspective of Parkinson Nurses on care priorities in people with Parkinson's disease.
Design
Qualitative study.
Setting(s)
The iCare-PD study served as the object of study by establishing an interdisciplinary, person-centered and nurse-led care model in several European countries and Canada. The nurses who participated in this model were part of the study.
Participants
Six Parkinson Nurses participated in the study.
Methods
We conducted a thematic focus group, adopting the paradigm of pragmatism to draft an interview guide. The focus group was based on the inspiration card method and followed recommendations for co-creation processes.
Results
Parkinson Nurses define care priorities for Parkinson's in areas of education, multi-professionalism, and need-orientation. They see themselves as mediators and coordinators of care delivery processes.
Conclusions
In line with international recommendations, Parkinson Nurses prioritize key aspects of multidisciplinary and person-centered care. At the same time, however, the nurses also name care priorities that go beyond the international recommendations. It is therefore crucial to integrate the perspective of this important profession into recommendations for the delivery of healthcare for people with Parkinson's.
Tweetable abstract How do specialized nurses define priorities for person-centered Parkinson's care? Answers are sought in this qualitative study by @MarlenaMunster.
{"title":"Priorities in healthcare provision in Parkinson's disease from the perspective of Parkinson Nurses: A focus group study","authors":"","doi":"10.1016/j.ijnsa.2024.100213","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.ijnsa.2024.100213","url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>Through their expertise and diverse skills, Parkinson Nurses are key care providers for people with Parkinson's disease. They are seen as an important profession for person-centered and multidisciplinary care, considered priorities in Parkinson's care delivery. Currently, however, little is known about the priorities that this profession itself defines for the care of Parkinson's patients and how they perceive their own role in the care process.</p></div><div><h3>Objective</h3><p>To explore the perspective of Parkinson Nurses on care priorities in people with Parkinson's disease.</p></div><div><h3>Design</h3><p>Qualitative study.</p></div><div><h3>Setting(s)</h3><p>The iCare-PD study served as the object of study by establishing an interdisciplinary, person-centered and nurse-led care model in several European countries and Canada. The nurses who participated in this model were part of the study.</p></div><div><h3>Participants</h3><p>Six Parkinson Nurses participated in the study.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>We conducted a thematic focus group, adopting the paradigm of pragmatism to draft an interview guide. The focus group was based on the inspiration card method and followed recommendations for co-creation processes.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Parkinson Nurses define care priorities for Parkinson's in areas of education, multi-professionalism, and need-orientation. They see themselves as mediators and coordinators of care delivery processes.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>In line with international recommendations, Parkinson Nurses prioritize key aspects of multidisciplinary and person-centered care. At the same time, however, the nurses also name care priorities that go beyond the international recommendations. It is therefore crucial to integrate the perspective of this important profession into recommendations for the delivery of healthcare for people with Parkinson's.</p><p>Tweetable abstract How do <em>specialized nurses define priorities for person-centered Parkinson's care? Answers are sought in this qualitative study by @MarlenaMunster.</em></p></div>","PeriodicalId":34476,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Nursing Studies Advances","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.1,"publicationDate":"2024-06-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666142X24000407/pdfft?md5=8c493eeb2c0d60dd871c0fc42e271fff&pid=1-s2.0-S2666142X24000407-main.pdf","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141412615","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-06-08DOI: 10.1016/j.ijnsa.2024.100215
Tara Leigh Moore
Background
Chronic illness diagnosis while living in low resourced communities creates ongoing adversity in the process of adaptation. Resilience is an important phenomenon of study to improve health outcomes. The subject in this particular population has been poorly studied.
Objective
To conceptualize resilience of individuals with chronic illness who reside in low resource communities.
Design
Concept analysis
Data sources
Seminal works and current studies were searched in PubMed (including Medline), Science Direct, the Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature (CINAHL), ProQuest, Google Scholar, OVID, Ebsco, and the Cochrane Database. Qualitative and quantitative studies that investigated individual resilience of adults in the setting of chronic illness who reside in low resource communities were included. Exclusions included children with chronic illness and resilience of communities and populations.
Methods
Walker and Avant's method of concept analysis was utilized. The key elements for conceptualizing resilience in the setting of chronic illness who reside in low resource communities included defining attributes, antecedents and consequences of resilience identified from the literature search.
Results
Analysis revealed three defining attributes: (1) reflection, contemplation, and the will to live despite adversity through hope; (2) personal transcendence through action; and (3) continuous personal transcendence and maintenance. Antecedents and consequences of resilience in the setting of chronic illness who reside in low resource communities were described and outlined.
Conclusions
The conceptualization of resilience in the setting of chronic illness who reside in low resource communities is based on the defining attributes, antecedents, and consequences that resulted in a preliminary conceptual model. The model can be further tested in diverse populations to add to the existing knowledge on the subject, and develop interventions to foster resilience aimed to improve health outcomes and quality of life.
背景确诊慢性病时,生活在资源匮乏的社区,在适应过程中会产生持续的逆境。复原力是研究改善健康结果的一个重要现象。目标对居住在资源匮乏社区的慢性病患者的复原力进行概念化设计概念分析数据来源在PubMed(包括Medline)、Science Direct、Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature (CINAHL)、ProQuest、Google Scholar、OVID、Ebsco和Cochrane数据库中搜索了过去的著作和当前的研究。本研究纳入了调查居住在资源匮乏社区的成年人在慢性病环境下个人抗病能力的定性和定量研究。方法采用沃克和阿凡特的概念分析方法。分析结果显示了三种定义属性:(1)反思、沉思以及通过希望在逆境中生存的意志;(2)通过行动实现个人超越;以及(3)持续的个人超越和保持。对居住在资源匮乏社区的慢性病患者复原力的前因后果进行了描述和概述。该模型可在不同人群中进行进一步测试,以补充现有的相关知识,并制定干预措施来培养抗逆力,从而改善健康状况和生活质量。
{"title":"Resilience of individuals with chronic illness who reside in low resource communities: a concept analysis","authors":"Tara Leigh Moore","doi":"10.1016/j.ijnsa.2024.100215","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.ijnsa.2024.100215","url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>Chronic illness diagnosis while living in low resourced communities creates ongoing adversity in the process of adaptation. Resilience is an important phenomenon of study to improve health outcomes. The subject in this particular population has been poorly studied.</p></div><div><h3>Objective</h3><p>To conceptualize resilience of individuals with chronic illness who reside in low resource communities.</p></div><div><h3>Design</h3><p>Concept analysis</p></div><div><h3>Data sources</h3><p>Seminal works and current studies were searched in PubMed (including Medline), Science Direct, the Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature (CINAHL), ProQuest, Google Scholar, OVID, Ebsco, and the Cochrane Database. Qualitative and quantitative studies that investigated individual resilience of adults in the setting of chronic illness who reside in low resource communities were included. Exclusions included children with chronic illness and resilience of communities and populations.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>Walker and Avant's method of concept analysis was utilized. The key elements for conceptualizing resilience in the setting of chronic illness who reside in low resource communities included defining attributes, antecedents and consequences of resilience identified from the literature search.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Analysis revealed three defining attributes: (1) reflection, contemplation, and the will to live despite adversity through hope; (2) personal transcendence through action; and (3) continuous personal transcendence and maintenance. Antecedents and consequences of resilience in the setting of chronic illness who reside in low resource communities were described and outlined.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>The conceptualization of resilience in the setting of chronic illness who reside in low resource communities is based on the defining attributes, antecedents, and consequences that resulted in a preliminary conceptual model. The model can be further tested in diverse populations to add to the existing knowledge on the subject, and develop interventions to foster resilience aimed to improve health outcomes and quality of life.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":34476,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Nursing Studies Advances","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.1,"publicationDate":"2024-06-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666142X24000420/pdfft?md5=ece0f02fbc2d9cd9b8214fb6a23efc88&pid=1-s2.0-S2666142X24000420-main.pdf","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141411534","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-06-06DOI: 10.1016/j.ijnsa.2024.100211
Background
The introduction of nursing associates in England in 2017 as a professional ‘bridging’ role aimed to mitigate chronic staffing shortages, enable career progression of healthcare assistants and release registered nurses to provide more complex care. Limited evidence exists about the alignment between the identity and purpose of nursing associate roles described by the UK independent regulator, the Nursing & Midwifery Council, and the expectations, obligations, and team dynamics encountered in practice.
Purpose
Investigate the perceptions of nursing associate roles through the views and experiences of role holders, registered nurses, and healthcare assistants.
Setting
Two British National Health Service (NHS) Hospital Trusts in London, England (UK).
Methods
For this registered service evaluation, data were collected via in-person, semi-structured interviews. Verbatim transcripts were coded inductively. An adapted framework analysis method, suitable for use with Excel, was applied to support the identification of cross cutting themes. We used the Standards for Reporting Qualitative Research checklist for reporting this study.
Results
Eleven registered nurses, five nursing associates, and five healthcare assistants participated. Their experiences seldom reflected the policy vision of the nursing associate role in practice. Several participants likened the nursing associate role to the fable of the ‘Emperor's New Clothes’ in which expectations and reality diverge. With this over-arching theme, four sub-themes were identified: (1) preparedness of organisational infrastructure to support this role; (2) credibility of the role in practice; (3) perceived organisational “blindness” to the ambiguities of the role and (4) increasing task orientation and segmentation in care delivery.
Conclusion
There is a discrepancy between the identity of the nursing associate role as imagined in the policy agenda and its reality in practice. There is a need for more protected and well-defined training, clear role boundaries, and accessible career progression pathways for nursing associates. Moreover, honest dialogue at an organisational and policy level must continue, so that the challenges and opportunities of the nursing associate role are properly realised.
Tweetable abstract
Emperor's new clothes! Experiences and views of new nursing associate roles in NHS (UK) acute hospitals @CarolynSpring3.
{"title":"‘The Emperor's new clothes?’ Healthcare professionals’ perceptions of the nursing associate role in two UK National Health Service hospitals: A qualitative interview study","authors":"","doi":"10.1016/j.ijnsa.2024.100211","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.ijnsa.2024.100211","url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>The introduction of nursing associates in England in 2017 as a professional ‘bridging’ role aimed to mitigate chronic staffing shortages, enable career progression of healthcare assistants and release registered nurses to provide more complex care. Limited evidence exists about the alignment between the identity and purpose of nursing associate roles described by the UK independent regulator, the Nursing & Midwifery Council, and the expectations, obligations, and team dynamics encountered in practice.</p></div><div><h3>Purpose</h3><p>Investigate the perceptions of nursing associate roles through the views and experiences of role holders, registered nurses, and healthcare assistants.</p></div><div><h3>Setting</h3><p>Two British National Health Service (NHS) Hospital Trusts in London, England (UK).</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>For this registered service evaluation, data were collected via in-person, semi-structured interviews. Verbatim transcripts were coded inductively. An adapted framework analysis method, suitable for use with Excel, was applied to support the identification of cross cutting themes. We used the Standards for Reporting Qualitative Research checklist for reporting this study.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Eleven registered nurses, five nursing associates, and five healthcare assistants participated. Their experiences seldom reflected the policy vision of the nursing associate role in practice. Several participants likened the nursing associate role to the fable of the ‘Emperor's New Clothes’ in which expectations and reality diverge. With this over-arching theme, four sub-themes were identified: (1) preparedness of organisational infrastructure to support this role; (2) credibility of the role in practice; (3) perceived organisational “blindness” to the ambiguities of the role and (4) increasing task orientation and segmentation in care delivery.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>There is a discrepancy between the identity of the nursing associate role as imagined in the policy agenda and its reality in practice. There is a need for more protected and well-defined training, clear role boundaries, and accessible career progression pathways for nursing associates. Moreover, honest dialogue at an organisational and policy level must continue, so that the challenges and opportunities of the nursing associate role are properly realised.</p></div><div><h3>Tweetable abstract</h3><p>Emperor's new clothes! Experiences and views of new nursing associate roles in NHS (UK) acute hospitals @CarolynSpring3.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":34476,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Nursing Studies Advances","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.1,"publicationDate":"2024-06-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666142X24000389/pdfft?md5=2d4b21337039443afda5db9c013e0e5b&pid=1-s2.0-S2666142X24000389-main.pdf","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141389316","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-06-06DOI: 10.1016/j.ijnsa.2024.100212
Amber Odom , Leonie James , Sheena Butts , Charles J. French , Jonathan M. Cayce
Background
An external vendor providing off-the-shelf spinal orthoses to inpatients created significant costs and barriers to quality care for spinal surgery patients. A nursing leadership team initiated a quality improvement project to reduce the cost of providing off-the-shelf spinal orthoses and improve the care provided to spinal patients.
Objective
To develop and evaluate a nursing-led process for providing off-the-shelf orthoses to spinal surgery patients and eliminate high costs.
Design
Quality improvement project evaluated as a retrospective interrupted time-series
Setting
Post Surgery Inpatient Unit Level II Trauma Center in a United States hospital located in Florida
The nursing leadership team developed a centralized spinal orthoses program where the bedside nurse fitted the patient with a spinal orthosis, eliminating the need for an external orthotist. The study quantifies changes in study metrics by comparing patients identified through chart review who received care in the vendor program to those who received care in the centralized program utilizing nonparametric statistical techniques.
Results
The centralized nursing-led spinal orthosis program allowed the unit to mobilize patients more quickly than patients managed under the vendor program (3.85 hr. [95 % CI: 1.27 to 7.26 hrs] reduction; p = 0.004). The overall length of stay was reduced by 0.78 days ([1.34 – 0.02 days]; p = 0.063) or 18.72 h. While the statistical test did not indicate significance, the 18.72-hour reduction in length of stay represents a potential clinically relevant finding. Evaluating patients that suffered a primary spinal injury and no complications (vendor program: 54 patients; centralized program: 86 patients) showed a similar reduction in time to mobilization (4.5 hr reduction [0.53 to 12.93 hrs]; p = 0.025), but the length of stay reduction increased to 1.02 days [0.12 to 1.97 days], a difference determined to be statistically significant (p = 0.014). Centralizing the process for providing off-the-shelf spinal orthoses reduced the cost of a thoracic-lumbar sacral orthosis by $1,483 and the price of a lumbar-sacral orthosis by $1,327. Throughout the study, the new program reduced the cost of providing spinal orthoses by $175,319.
Conclusions
The results demonstrate that the nursing-led centralized spinal orthosis program positively impacted the quality of care provided to our patients while also reducing the cost of delivering the orthoses.
Tweetable abstract
A nursing-led centralized spinal orthosis program reduces the cost of care while reducing time to mobilization and length of stay.
{"title":"Reducing costs and improving patient recovery through a nurse-driven centralized spinal orthoses program on a post-surgical unit: A quality improvement initiative","authors":"Amber Odom , Leonie James , Sheena Butts , Charles J. French , Jonathan M. Cayce","doi":"10.1016/j.ijnsa.2024.100212","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.ijnsa.2024.100212","url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>An external vendor providing off-the-shelf spinal orthoses to inpatients created significant costs and barriers to quality care for spinal surgery patients. A nursing leadership team initiated a quality improvement project to reduce the cost of providing off-the-shelf spinal orthoses and improve the care provided to spinal patients.</p></div><div><h3>Objective</h3><p>To develop and evaluate a nursing-led process for providing off-the-shelf orthoses to spinal surgery patients and eliminate high costs.</p></div><div><h3>Design</h3><p>Quality improvement project evaluated as a retrospective interrupted time-series</p></div><div><h3>Setting</h3><p>Post Surgery Inpatient Unit Level II Trauma Center in a United States hospital located in Florida</p></div><div><h3>Participants</h3><p>Vendor Program: 134 patients; Centralized Program: 155 patients</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>The nursing leadership team developed a centralized spinal orthoses program where the bedside nurse fitted the patient with a spinal orthosis, eliminating the need for an external orthotist. The study quantifies changes in study metrics by comparing patients identified through chart review who received care in the vendor program to those who received care in the centralized program utilizing nonparametric statistical techniques.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>The centralized nursing-led spinal orthosis program allowed the unit to mobilize patients more quickly than patients managed under the vendor program (3.85 hr. [95 % CI: 1.27 to 7.26 hrs] reduction; <em>p</em> = 0.004). The overall length of stay was reduced by 0.78 days ([1.34 – 0.02 days]; <em>p</em> = 0.063) or 18.72 h. While the statistical test did not indicate significance, the 18.72-hour reduction in length of stay represents a potential clinically relevant finding. Evaluating patients that suffered a primary spinal injury and no complications (vendor program: 54 patients; centralized program: 86 patients) showed a similar reduction in time to mobilization (4.5 hr reduction [0.53 to 12.93 hrs]; <em>p</em> = 0.025), but the length of stay reduction increased to 1.02 days [0.12 to 1.97 days], a difference determined to be statistically significant (<em>p</em> = 0.014). Centralizing the process for providing off-the-shelf spinal orthoses reduced the cost of a thoracic-lumbar sacral orthosis by $1,483 and the price of a lumbar-sacral orthosis by $1,327. Throughout the study, the new program reduced the cost of providing spinal orthoses by $175,319.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>The results demonstrate that the nursing-led centralized spinal orthosis program positively impacted the quality of care provided to our patients while also reducing the cost of delivering the orthoses.</p></div><div><h3>Tweetable abstract</h3><p>A nursing-led centralized spinal orthosis program reduces the cost of care while reducing time to mobilization and length of stay.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":34476,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Nursing Studies Advances","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.1,"publicationDate":"2024-06-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666142X24000390/pdfft?md5=ea873b1bd096b1d7a790c6acedce3b75&pid=1-s2.0-S2666142X24000390-main.pdf","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141393626","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-06-05DOI: 10.1016/j.ijnsa.2024.100214
Ernawaty Ernawaty , Suni Hariati , Ariyanti Saleh
Background
Orientation programs for new nurses play an essential role in preparing them for challenges in clinical practice. Different countries have applied varying program components and durations in organizing these programs.
Objectives
To explore the program components, impact, and duration of the orientation programs for new graduate nurses in hospital care settings.
Method
We gathered information from studies conducted in various countries. Searches were conducted on databases including PubMed, Sage Journal, ScienceDirect, EBSCO, and Wiley, with secondary searches from 2018 to 2023 using Arkey and O'Malley's Review Scoping Framework. The inclusion criteria comprised studies with primary data, both qualitative and quantitative, focusing on new nurses undergoing orientation programs in hospitals.
Results
Of the 989 articles screened, 14 were included. Methods identified included providing hands-on experience, sharing information, reflecting on work experiences, and developing technical skills. Significant findings encompassed increased competence, knowledge, confidence, and satisfaction, as well as professional development and positive organizational impacts. The duration of orientation programs ranged from 2 weeks to 2 years, depending on the program type and new graduate nurse needs.
Conclusion
This scoping review elucidates program components, impact, and duration of new nurse orientation programs in hospitals, providing valuable insights for hospital management in designing and developing improved programs.
Tweetable abstract
Exploring program components, impact, and duration of hopitals new graduate nurse orientation programs, revealing insights to enhance patient care and nursing practice@Ns_Ernawaty
背景新护士入职培训项目在帮助她们做好准备迎接临床实践挑战方面发挥着至关重要的作用。目标探讨医院护理环境中新毕业护士定向培训项目的内容、影响和持续时间。方法我们从不同国家进行的研究中收集信息。检索数据库包括PubMed、Sage Journal、ScienceDirect、EBSCO和Wiley,并使用Arkey和O'Malley的综述范围界定框架对2018年至2023年的研究进行了二次检索。纳入标准包括具有原始数据的研究,包括定性和定量研究,重点关注在医院接受入职培训计划的新护士。所确定的方法包括提供实践经验、分享信息、反思工作经验和发展技术技能。重要发现包括能力、知识、信心和满意度的提高,以及专业发展和对组织的积极影响。Tweetable摘要Exploring program components, impact, and duration of hopitals new graduate nurse orientation programs, revealing insights to enhance patient care and nursing practice@Ns_Ernawaty
{"title":"Program components, impact, and duration of implementing a new nurse orientation program in hospital contexts: A scoping review","authors":"Ernawaty Ernawaty , Suni Hariati , Ariyanti Saleh","doi":"10.1016/j.ijnsa.2024.100214","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijnsa.2024.100214","url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>Orientation programs for new nurses play an essential role in preparing them for challenges in clinical practice. Different countries have applied varying program components and durations in organizing these programs.</p></div><div><h3>Objectives</h3><p>To explore the program components, impact, and duration of the orientation programs for new graduate nurses in hospital care settings.</p></div><div><h3>Method</h3><p>We gathered information from studies conducted in various countries. Searches were conducted on databases including PubMed, Sage Journal, ScienceDirect, EBSCO, and Wiley, with secondary searches from 2018 to 2023 using Arkey and O'Malley's Review Scoping Framework. The inclusion criteria comprised studies with primary data, both qualitative and quantitative, focusing on new nurses undergoing orientation programs in hospitals.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Of the 989 articles screened, 14 were included. Methods identified included providing hands-on experience, sharing information, reflecting on work experiences, and developing technical skills. Significant findings encompassed increased competence, knowledge, confidence, and satisfaction, as well as professional development and positive organizational impacts. The duration of orientation programs ranged from 2 weeks to 2 years, depending on the program type and new graduate nurse needs.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>This scoping review elucidates program components, impact, and duration of new nurse orientation programs in hospitals, providing valuable insights for hospital management in designing and developing improved programs.</p></div><div><h3>Tweetable abstract</h3><p>Exploring program components, impact, and duration of hopitals new graduate nurse orientation programs, revealing insights to enhance patient care and nursing practice@Ns_Ernawaty</p></div>","PeriodicalId":34476,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Nursing Studies Advances","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-06-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666142X24000419/pdfft?md5=35628978583b4a4fdc784130bcca60f0&pid=1-s2.0-S2666142X24000419-main.pdf","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141324476","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-06-01DOI: 10.1016/j.ijnsa.2024.100210
Jing-Ling Li , Qin Ye , Ning Liu
Background
Some cancer patients not only endure physical and mental distress due to the disease and treatment but also shoulder the responsibility of raising their children. This situation significantly impacts the patients' quality of life. While there is a growing body of qualitative research focusing on parenting concerns among cancer patients, there remains a lack of comprehensive qualitative evidence.
Objective
This study aims to conduct a systematic review and synthesis of qualitative research evidence, investigating the experiences of cancer patients in raising minor children.
Design
Systematic review and synthesis of qualitative studies.
Setting(s)
Through a screening process employing inclusion/exclusion criteria, qualitative studies specifically addressing cancer patients raising minor children were identified.
Participants
Participants: A total of 669 participants from 40 studies were included in the review.
Methods
Four English (Pubmed, Web of Science, Embase and Cochrane Library) and three Chinese (CNKI, Wanfang and Sinomed) databases were searched for qualitative studies of the real-life experiences of raising children in cancer patients from the establishment of the library to January 2024. The methodological quality of the included literature was assessed using the Critical Appraisal Skill Program (CSAP). Qualitative data were extracted, summarized, and meta-synthesized.
Results
A total of 26 studies were included in this meta-synthesis, encompassing 11 different countries. 160 themes were extracted from these included literatures, which were combined into ten categories, ultimately forming four themes: the impact of parents' disease on their children, the challenges of parenting, coping strategies, and multifaceted parenting needs. Based on the Confidence in the Output of Qualitative research synthesis (ConQual) approach, the confidence level of the synthesized findings ranged from moderate to low.
Conclusions
Cancer patients experience significant psychological stress while raising children, which can lead to a reduction in their quality of life and influence treatment decisions. These findings elucidate the parenting concerns experienced by cancer patients, allowing medical staff to understand their emotions and treatment preferences. Additionally, healthcare professionals should pay attention to the special needs of this group and develop targeted interventions to support and reduce patients' psychological stress and burden.
{"title":"Cancer parents’ experiences of parenting concerns about minor children: A meta-synthesis of qualitative studies","authors":"Jing-Ling Li , Qin Ye , Ning Liu","doi":"10.1016/j.ijnsa.2024.100210","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.ijnsa.2024.100210","url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>Some cancer patients not only endure physical and mental distress due to the disease and treatment but also shoulder the responsibility of raising their children. This situation significantly impacts the patients' quality of life. While there is a growing body of qualitative research focusing on parenting concerns among cancer patients, there remains a lack of comprehensive qualitative evidence.</p></div><div><h3>Objective</h3><p>This study aims to conduct a systematic review and synthesis of qualitative research evidence, investigating the experiences of cancer patients in raising minor children.</p></div><div><h3>Design</h3><p>Systematic review and synthesis of qualitative studies.</p></div><div><h3>Setting(s)</h3><p>Through a screening process employing inclusion/exclusion criteria, qualitative studies specifically addressing cancer patients raising minor children were identified.</p></div><div><h3>Participants</h3><p>Participants: A total of 669 participants from 40 studies were included in the review.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>Four English (Pubmed, Web of Science, Embase and Cochrane Library) and three Chinese (CNKI, Wanfang and Sinomed) databases were searched for qualitative studies of the real-life experiences of raising children in cancer patients from the establishment of the library to January 2024. The methodological quality of the included literature was assessed using the Critical Appraisal Skill Program (CSAP). Qualitative data were extracted, summarized, and meta-synthesized.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>A total of 26 studies were included in this meta-synthesis, encompassing 11 different countries. 160 themes were extracted from these included literatures, which were combined into ten categories, ultimately forming four themes: the impact of parents' disease on their children, the challenges of parenting, coping strategies, and multifaceted parenting needs. Based on the Confidence in the Output of Qualitative research synthesis (ConQual) approach, the confidence level of the synthesized findings ranged from moderate to low.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>Cancer patients experience significant psychological stress while raising children, which can lead to a reduction in their quality of life and influence treatment decisions. These findings elucidate the parenting concerns experienced by cancer patients, allowing medical staff to understand their emotions and treatment preferences. Additionally, healthcare professionals should pay attention to the special needs of this group and develop targeted interventions to support and reduce patients' psychological stress and burden.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":34476,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Nursing Studies Advances","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666142X24000377/pdfft?md5=8bf05f7848f62b56fad5a035205b00b8&pid=1-s2.0-S2666142X24000377-main.pdf","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141142477","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-06-01DOI: 10.1016/j.ijnsa.2023.100117
Caroline René , Isabelle Landry , Francine de Montigny
{"title":"Erratum to “Couples’ experiences of pregnancy resulting from assisted reproductive technologies: A qualitative meta-synthesis”, international journal of nursing studies advances 4 (2022) article number: 100059","authors":"Caroline René , Isabelle Landry , Francine de Montigny","doi":"10.1016/j.ijnsa.2023.100117","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijnsa.2023.100117","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":34476,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Nursing Studies Advances","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666142X23000012/pdfft?md5=b9783655ecbdab6774eaee4c7f8abaae&pid=1-s2.0-S2666142X23000012-main.pdf","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141325661","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Incidents affecting patient safety can cause unnecessary injury to a patient. It is generally accepted that incident reporting can improve patient safety. In Ethiopian public hospitals, especially in the Hadiya zone, patient safety-related incidents are commonly witnessed, but there is no evidence of reporting behavior among healthcare professionals.
Purpose
This study aimed to assess patient safety incident reporting behavior and its associated factors among healthcare professionals working in public hospitals in the Hadiya zone, South Nation's, Nationalities, and Peoples’ Region, Ethiopia, in 2021.
Method
A cross-sectional study design was employed, among 345 healthcare professionals working in public hospitals in the Hadiya zone from August 1–30, 2021. A simple random sampling technique was used to select study participants, and a structured self-administered questionnaire which is adapted from a Hospital survey on patient safety survey and literature was used to collect the data. The data were entered into a data attraction template prepared using the Epi data software and then exported to the SPSS version 25 software for analysis. Descriptive analyses were conducted to determine the general characteristics and distributions of the data collected. An inferential statistical analysis was conducted using the logistic regression model to identify associations between outcome and predictor variables. The odds ratio with the 95 % confidence interval was used to test the associations between the outcome variable and predictor variables. Finally, statistical significance was set at p-value < 0.05.
Results
From the total of 354 healthcare professionals expected, 334 participants, which gave a response rate of 94.4 %, had completed and returned the questionnaire. The result shows that overall patient safety incident reporting behavior among healthcare professionals was 28.7 % (95 % Confidence Interval (CI): (24.6, 33.2). Being a nurse professional [Adjusted Odd Ratio (AOR): 5.48, 95 % CI: (1.67, 17.80)], having job training [AOR: 2.87, 95 % CI: (1.46, 6.28)], having a team within the units [AOR=2.79, 95 %CI: (1.23, 6.28)], communication openness [AOR=2.78, 95 %CI: (1.44, 5.37)], and management support [AOR=2.8, 95 %CI; (1.40, 5.60)] were found to factor significantly associated with patient safety incident reporting behaviour.
Conclusion
This study revealed that the incident-reporting behavior among healthcare professionals was low compared to previous studies. Being a nurse professional, having an on -job training, having a team within the unit, communication openness, perception of the time reporting takes, fear of administration sanction and management support were factors associated with their patient safety incident reporting behavior. Managers should focus on patient safety incidents, prepare continuous training progr
{"title":"Patient safety incident reporting behavior and its associated factors among healthcare professionals in Hadiya zone, Ethiopia: A facility based cross-sectional study","authors":"Amina Shemsu , Abebe Dechasa , Mulatu Ayana , Meseret Robi Tura","doi":"10.1016/j.ijnsa.2024.100209","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.ijnsa.2024.100209","url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>Incidents affecting patient safety can cause unnecessary injury to a patient. It is generally accepted that incident reporting can improve patient safety. In Ethiopian public hospitals, especially in the Hadiya zone, patient safety-related incidents are commonly witnessed, but there is no evidence of reporting behavior among healthcare professionals.</p></div><div><h3>Purpose</h3><p>This study aimed to assess patient safety incident reporting behavior and its associated factors among healthcare professionals working in public hospitals in the Hadiya zone, South Nation's, Nationalities, and Peoples’ Region, Ethiopia, in 2021.</p></div><div><h3>Method</h3><p>A cross-sectional study design was employed, among 345 healthcare professionals working in public hospitals in the Hadiya zone from August 1–30, 2021. A simple random sampling technique was used to select study participants, and a structured self-administered questionnaire which is adapted from a Hospital survey on patient safety survey and literature was used to collect the data. The data were entered into a data attraction template prepared using the Epi data software and then exported to the SPSS version 25 software for analysis. Descriptive analyses were conducted to determine the general characteristics and distributions of the data collected. An inferential statistical analysis was conducted using the logistic regression model to identify associations between outcome and predictor variables. The odds ratio with the 95 % confidence interval was used to test the associations between the outcome variable and predictor variables. Finally, statistical significance was set at p-value < 0.05.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>From the total of 354 healthcare professionals expected, 334 participants, which gave a response rate of 94.4 %, had completed and returned the questionnaire. The result shows that overall patient safety incident reporting behavior among healthcare professionals was 28.7 % (95 % Confidence Interval (CI): (24.6, 33.2). Being a nurse professional [Adjusted Odd Ratio (AOR): 5.48, 95 % CI: (1.67, 17.80)], having job training [AOR: 2.87, 95 % CI: (1.46, 6.28)], having a team within the units [AOR=2.79, 95 %CI: (1.23, 6.28)], communication openness [AOR=2.78, 95 %CI: (1.44, 5.37)], and management support [AOR=2.8, 95 %CI; (1.40, 5.60)] were found to factor significantly associated with patient safety incident reporting behaviour.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>This study revealed that the incident-reporting behavior among healthcare professionals was low compared to previous studies. Being a nurse professional, having an on -job training, having a team within the unit, communication openness, perception of the time reporting takes, fear of administration sanction and management support were factors associated with their patient safety incident reporting behavior. Managers should focus on patient safety incidents, prepare continuous training progr","PeriodicalId":34476,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Nursing Studies Advances","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666142X24000365/pdfft?md5=ac4196a90e066ba125f45250bc28f435&pid=1-s2.0-S2666142X24000365-main.pdf","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141136729","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-06-01DOI: 10.1016/j.ijnsa.2023.100118
Caroline René , Isabelle Landry , Francine de Montigny
{"title":"Corrigendum to 'Couples’ experiences of pregnancy resulting from assisted reproductive technologies: A qualitative meta-synthesis', International Journal of Nursing Studies Advances (2022) Article Number: 100059","authors":"Caroline René , Isabelle Landry , Francine de Montigny","doi":"10.1016/j.ijnsa.2023.100118","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.ijnsa.2023.100118","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":34476,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Nursing Studies Advances","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666142X23000024/pdfft?md5=9d4bc42aa288f3759f49a96e9d2a90a7&pid=1-s2.0-S2666142X23000024-main.pdf","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"49621000","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-05-11DOI: 10.1016/j.ijnsa.2024.100207
Stefan Bushuven , Michael Bentele , Stefanie Bentele , Milena Trifunovic-Koenig , Sven Lederle , Bianka Gerber , Joachim Bansbach , Julian Friebel , Julian Ganter , Irit Nachtigall , Simone Scheithauer
Introduction
Despite high vulnerability to infection, hand disinfection compliance in emergencies is low. This is regularly justified as the disinfection procedure delays life support, and instead, wearing disposable gloves is preferred. Simulation studies showed higher achievable compliance than detected in real-life situations. This study aimed to explore healthcare providers’ attitudes toward hand disinfection and using gloves in emergencies.
Methods
We conducted an anonymous online survey in Germany on the attitude and subjective behavior in the five moments of hand hygiene in a closed environment and an open convenience sampling survey. Statistics included paired student's t-tests corrected for multiple testing. For qualitative analysis, we employed a single-coder approach.
Results
In 400 participants, we detected low priority of WHO-1 (before touching a patient) and WHO-2 (before clean/aseptic procedure) hand hygiene moments, despite knowing the risks of omission of hand disinfection. For all moments, self-assessment exceeded the assessment of colleagues (p < 0.001). For WHO-3, we detected a lower disinfection priority for wearing gloves compared to contaminated bare hands. Qualitative analyses revealed five themes: basic conditions, didactic implementations, cognitive load, and uncertainty about feasibility and efficacy.
Discussion
Considering bias, the study's subjective nature, the unknown role of emergency-related infections contributing to hospital-acquired infections, and different experiences of healthcare providers, we conclude that hand disinfection before emergencies is de-prioritized and justified by the emergency situation regardless of the objective feasibility.
Conclusion
This study reveals subjective and objective barriers to implementation of WHO-1 and WHO-2 moments of hand disinfection to be further evaluated and addressed in educational programs.
{"title":"Hand hygiene in emergencies: Multiprofessional perceptions from a mixed methods based online survey in Germany","authors":"Stefan Bushuven , Michael Bentele , Stefanie Bentele , Milena Trifunovic-Koenig , Sven Lederle , Bianka Gerber , Joachim Bansbach , Julian Friebel , Julian Ganter , Irit Nachtigall , Simone Scheithauer","doi":"10.1016/j.ijnsa.2024.100207","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.ijnsa.2024.100207","url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><p>Despite high vulnerability to infection, hand disinfection compliance in emergencies is low. This is regularly justified as the disinfection procedure delays life support, and instead, wearing disposable gloves is preferred. Simulation studies showed higher achievable compliance than detected in real-life situations. This study aimed to explore healthcare providers’ attitudes toward hand disinfection and using gloves in emergencies.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>We conducted an anonymous online survey in Germany on the attitude and subjective behavior in the five moments of hand hygiene in a closed environment and an open convenience sampling survey. Statistics included paired student's <em>t</em>-tests corrected for multiple testing. For qualitative analysis, we employed a single-coder approach.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>In 400 participants, we detected low priority of WHO-1 (before touching a patient) and WHO-2 (before clean/aseptic procedure) hand hygiene moments, despite knowing the risks of omission of hand disinfection. For all moments, self-assessment exceeded the assessment of colleagues (<em>p</em> < 0.001). For WHO-3, we detected a lower disinfection priority for wearing gloves compared to contaminated bare hands. Qualitative analyses revealed five themes: basic conditions, didactic implementations, cognitive load, and uncertainty about feasibility and efficacy.</p></div><div><h3>Discussion</h3><p>Considering bias, the study's subjective nature, the unknown role of emergency-related infections contributing to hospital-acquired infections, and different experiences of healthcare providers, we conclude that hand disinfection before emergencies is de-prioritized and justified by the emergency situation regardless of the objective feasibility.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>This study reveals subjective and objective barriers to implementation of WHO-1 and WHO-2 moments of hand disinfection to be further evaluated and addressed in educational programs.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":34476,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Nursing Studies Advances","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-05-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666142X24000341/pdfft?md5=f9c830465c96c726fb4e92a029d5899e&pid=1-s2.0-S2666142X24000341-main.pdf","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141041619","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}