首页 > 最新文献

Arthroscopy Sports Medicine and Rehabilitation最新文献

英文 中文
Younger Age, Female Sex, Low Income, and Poor Mental Health Are Patient-Perceived Risk Factors for Poor Access to Care for Rotator Cuff Tears 年龄小、女性、收入低和心理健康状况差是患者认为的肩袖撕裂患者难以获得护理的危险因素
Q3 Medicine Pub Date : 2025-08-01 DOI: 10.1016/j.asmr.2025.101167
Alejandro M. Holle B.S. , Sayi P. Boddu B.A. , Vikram S. Gill B.S. , Joseph C. Brinkman M.D. , Sailesh V. Tummala M.D. , Jens T. Verhey M.D. , John M. Tokish M.D.

Purpose

To evaluate which patient factors are associated with specific metrics of poor access to care in patients with a rotator cuff tear (RCT).

Methods

The All of Us Database was utilized to form a cohort of patients with RCT between May 2018 and May 2023. Patients with a diagnosis of RCT using Systematized Nomenclature of Medicine clinical terms were included. The association of RCT diagnosis and patient-specific factors on self-reported outcomes of “delayed care,” “could not afford care,” “skipped medication,” and “have not seen provider in more than 1 year” were analyzed. Statistical tests performed were univariate regression and multivariable logistic regression.

Results

In total, 4,265 patients with RCT who completed the access to care survey were included. In the RCT cohort, 26.7% reported delayed care, 24.9% reported an inability to afford care, 12.1% reported skipped medications, and 1.7% reported not seeing a provider in more than 1 year. Multivariable analysis of patient treatment and demographic features revealed younger age, female sex, lower income, poor physical health, and poor mental health to be strongly associated with higher reported rates of delayed care, inability to afford care, and skipped medications. History of rotator cuff repair, marital status, and sexual orientation were not associated with reported poor access to care.

Conclusions

A quarter of patients with rotator cuff tears report delays in overall medical care and inability to afford care. Among patients diagnosed with RCT, patients of younger age, female sex, low income, and poor physical and mental health have higher odds of decreased access to health care.

Clinical Relevance

Health care disparities and access to care are topics that should be investigated to reduce them.
目的评估哪些患者因素与肩袖撕裂患者难以获得护理的具体指标相关(RCT)。方法利用All of Us数据库对2018年5月至2023年5月的患者进行随机对照试验。采用系统化医学临床术语命名法诊断为RCT的患者纳入研究。分析了RCT诊断和患者特异性因素与自我报告结果“延迟治疗”、“负担不起治疗”、“跳过药物治疗”和“1年以上未见提供者”的关联。统计检验采用单变量回归和多变量logistic回归。结果共纳入4265例完成护理可及性调查的RCT患者。在RCT队列中,26.7%的人报告延迟治疗,24.9%的人报告无力支付治疗,12.1%的人报告跳过药物治疗,1.7%的人报告超过1年没有看医生。患者治疗和人口统计学特征的多变量分析显示,年龄较小、女性、收入较低、身体健康状况不佳和精神健康状况不佳与较高的延迟治疗率、无法负担医疗费用和漏药率密切相关。肩袖修复史、婚姻状况和性取向与报告的难以获得护理无关。结论:四分之一的肩袖撕裂患者报告整体医疗护理延迟和无力支付护理费用。在诊断为RCT的患者中,年龄较小、女性、低收入和身心健康状况较差的患者获得医疗保健的机会减少的可能性更高。临床相关性医疗保健差距和获得护理的机会是应该调查的主题,以减少它们。
{"title":"Younger Age, Female Sex, Low Income, and Poor Mental Health Are Patient-Perceived Risk Factors for Poor Access to Care for Rotator Cuff Tears","authors":"Alejandro M. Holle B.S. ,&nbsp;Sayi P. Boddu B.A. ,&nbsp;Vikram S. Gill B.S. ,&nbsp;Joseph C. Brinkman M.D. ,&nbsp;Sailesh V. Tummala M.D. ,&nbsp;Jens T. Verhey M.D. ,&nbsp;John M. Tokish M.D.","doi":"10.1016/j.asmr.2025.101167","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.asmr.2025.101167","url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Purpose</h3><div>To evaluate which patient factors are associated with specific metrics of poor access to care in patients with a rotator cuff tear (RCT).</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>The All of Us Database was utilized to form a cohort of patients with RCT between May 2018 and May 2023. Patients with a diagnosis of RCT using Systematized Nomenclature of Medicine clinical terms were included. The association of RCT diagnosis and patient-specific factors on self-reported outcomes of “delayed care,” “could not afford care,” “skipped medication,” and “have not seen provider in more than 1 year” were analyzed. Statistical tests performed were univariate regression and multivariable logistic regression.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>In total, 4,265 patients with RCT who completed the access to care survey were included. In the RCT cohort, 26.7% reported delayed care, 24.9% reported an inability to afford care, 12.1% reported skipped medications, and 1.7% reported not seeing a provider in more than 1 year. Multivariable analysis of patient treatment and demographic features revealed younger age, female sex, lower income, poor physical health, and poor mental health to be strongly associated with higher reported rates of delayed care, inability to afford care, and skipped medications. History of rotator cuff repair, marital status, and sexual orientation were not associated with reported poor access to care.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>A quarter of patients with rotator cuff tears report delays in overall medical care and inability to afford care. Among patients diagnosed with RCT, patients of younger age, female sex, low income, and poor physical and mental health have higher odds of decreased access to health care.</div></div><div><h3>Clinical Relevance</h3><div>Health care disparities and access to care are topics that should be investigated to reduce them.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":34631,"journal":{"name":"Arthroscopy Sports Medicine and Rehabilitation","volume":"7 4","pages":"Article 101167"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2025-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144934047","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Biomechanical Effect of Dermal Allograft or Bone Block Augmentation on Standard Labral Repair in a Time-Zero Cadaveric Model of Glenoid Bone Loss 同种异体真皮移植或骨块增强对关节盂骨缺失尸体模型标准唇形修复的生物力学影响
Q3 Medicine Pub Date : 2025-08-01 DOI: 10.1016/j.asmr.2025.101193
Sam Akhavan M.D. , Brittany M. Glaeser M.S. , Sarah J. Ingwer B.S. , Sohail Qazi M.D. , Jahan Aslami M.S. , Oliver Hauck M.S.

Purpose

To biomechanically evaluate the stability of a labral repair technique using dermal augmentation (DA) compared with standard labral repair (SLR) and bone block augmentation (BBA) in the context of subcritical glenoid bone loss in a cadaveric model.

Methods

Eight cadaveric shoulder specimens were disarticulated and dissected, leaving only labral tissue. The specimens were secured to custom fixtures with 60° of glenohumeral abduction, 30° of external rotation, 20° of scapular anterior tilt, and 40 N of glenohumeral compression. In a repeated-measures design, the specimens were tested in 5 states: native, defect (with 15% glenoid bone loss), SLR, DA, and BBA. Dislocation was performed at 1 N/s over the anterior-inferior rim. Maximum load and distance to dislocation were recorded and statistically analyzed.

Results

Maximum loads for the defect state and SLR were significantly less than those for the native state (P = .005 and P = .008, respectively) and BBA (P = .014 and P = .022, respectively). The distance to dislocation decreased significantly for the defect state (P < .001) and SLR (P < .001) compared with the native state. The distance to dislocation for the defect state, SLR, and DA was significantly reduced compared with BBA (P < .001, P < .001, and P < .001, respectively). The distance to dislocation was significantly greater for DA than for the defect state (P < .001) and SLR (P = .001).

Conclusions

Dermal allograft repair showed similar biomechanical characteristics to the native state and showed an increased distance to dislocation and higher forces at dislocation compared with SLR. BBA restored the distance to dislocation and resulted in non-significantly increased maximum loads when compared with the native state.

Clinical Relevance

DA of labral repair is an alternative procedure for subcritical glenoid bone loss that potentially mitigates adverse effects from bone grafting. Future clinical investigation is warranted.
目的从生物力学角度评价采用真皮增强术(DA)与标准唇骨修复术(SLR)和骨块增强术(BBA)在治疗亚临界盂骨丢失的尸体模型中的稳定性。方法对8例尸体肩部标本进行分离解剖,只留下唇部组织。标本固定在定制固定装置上,盂肱外展60°,外旋30°,肩胛骨前倾20°,盂肱受压40 N。在重复测量设计中,标本在5种状态下进行测试:原生,缺陷(15%盂骨丢失),SLR, DA和BBA。在前下缘以1 N/s的速度脱位。记录最大载荷和脱位距离并进行统计分析。结果缺损状态和SLR的最大负荷显著小于原生状态(P = 0.005和P = 0.008)和BBA (P = 0.014和P = 0.022)。缺陷态(P < .001)和SLR (P < .001)与原生态相比,到位错的距离明显减小。与BBA相比,缺陷状态、SLR和DA到位错的距离显著缩短(P < 0.001, P < 0.001, P < 0.001)。DA到位错的距离明显大于缺陷状态(P < 0.001)和SLR (P = 0.001)。结论同种异体真皮移植修复具有与原生状态相似的生物力学特征,与SLR相比,脱位距离增加,脱位力增大。与自然状态相比,BBA恢复了脱位距离,导致最大载荷无显著增加。唇侧修复术是治疗亚临界盂骨丢失的一种替代方法,可以潜在地减轻骨移植的不良反应。未来的临床研究是必要的。
{"title":"Biomechanical Effect of Dermal Allograft or Bone Block Augmentation on Standard Labral Repair in a Time-Zero Cadaveric Model of Glenoid Bone Loss","authors":"Sam Akhavan M.D. ,&nbsp;Brittany M. Glaeser M.S. ,&nbsp;Sarah J. Ingwer B.S. ,&nbsp;Sohail Qazi M.D. ,&nbsp;Jahan Aslami M.S. ,&nbsp;Oliver Hauck M.S.","doi":"10.1016/j.asmr.2025.101193","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.asmr.2025.101193","url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Purpose</h3><div>To biomechanically evaluate the stability of a labral repair technique using dermal augmentation (DA) compared with standard labral repair (SLR) and bone block augmentation (BBA) in the context of subcritical glenoid bone loss in a cadaveric model.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>Eight cadaveric shoulder specimens were disarticulated and dissected, leaving only labral tissue. The specimens were secured to custom fixtures with 60° of glenohumeral abduction, 30° of external rotation, 20° of scapular anterior tilt, and 40 N of glenohumeral compression. In a repeated-measures design, the specimens were tested in 5 states: native, defect (with 15% glenoid bone loss), SLR, DA, and BBA. Dislocation was performed at 1 N/s over the anterior-inferior rim. Maximum load and distance to dislocation were recorded and statistically analyzed.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Maximum loads for the defect state and SLR were significantly less than those for the native state (<em>P</em> = .005 and <em>P</em> = .008, respectively) and BBA (<em>P</em> = .014 and <em>P</em> = .022, respectively). The distance to dislocation decreased significantly for the defect state (<em>P</em> &lt; .001) and SLR (<em>P</em> &lt; .001) compared with the native state. The distance to dislocation for the defect state, SLR, and DA was significantly reduced compared with BBA (<em>P</em> &lt; .001, <em>P</em> &lt; .001, and <em>P</em> &lt; .001, respectively). The distance to dislocation was significantly greater for DA than for the defect state (<em>P</em> &lt; .001) and SLR (<em>P</em> = .001).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>Dermal allograft repair showed similar biomechanical characteristics to the native state and showed an increased distance to dislocation and higher forces at dislocation compared with SLR. BBA restored the distance to dislocation and resulted in non-significantly increased maximum loads when compared with the native state.</div></div><div><h3>Clinical Relevance</h3><div>DA of labral repair is an alternative procedure for subcritical glenoid bone loss that potentially mitigates adverse effects from bone grafting. Future clinical investigation is warranted.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":34631,"journal":{"name":"Arthroscopy Sports Medicine and Rehabilitation","volume":"7 4","pages":"Article 101193"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2025-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144934050","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Players in the National Hockey League Experience Position-Specific Variations in Recovery and Performance After Shoulder Surgery 国家冰球联盟的球员在肩部手术后的恢复和表现中经历了特定位置的变化
Q3 Medicine Pub Date : 2025-08-01 DOI: 10.1016/j.asmr.2025.101153
Shaunak S. Digambar M.S. , Hayden Hartman B.S. , Daniel Walsh M.D. , Shreya M. Saraf M.S. , Mia V. Rumps M.S. , Rob Hand , Mary K. Mulcahey M.D.

Purpose

To determine the rate of return to play (RTP) and level of performance in National Hockey League (NHL) players after shoulder surgery from 2000 to 2020.

Methods

Data on NHL players undergoing shoulder surgery from 2000 to 2020 were collected from prosportstransactions.com. Performance metrics, including shots on goal, time on ice, saves, and goals against average, were analyzed for 1 season presurgery and 2 seasons postsurgery. Nonparametric analysis of variance and post-hoc tests assessed performance changes.

Results

Of 1,047 players, 120 met inclusion criteria. Centers had greater body mass index (mean = 26.7, P = .03), whereas goalies had lower body mass index(mean = 24.7, P = .008). Defenders sustained injuries later in their careers, whereas forwards had shorter careers after surgery. Average RTP was 235 days, with defenders returning sooner (203 days, P < .001) and goalies taking longer (437 days, P = .008). Forwards’ shots on goal/games played declined after surgery, whereas defenders’ time on ice/games played remained stable. No significant difference in games played per season was observed across positions. Each additional year of age reduced RTP by 7.5 days (P = 0.04).

Conclusions

Recovery times and performance after shoulder surgery in NHL players vary by position, although differences were statistically insignificant. Defenders had shortest RTP with stable performance, suggesting minimal impact endurance and defensive contributions. Goalies required longer RTP likely as the result of the physical demands of their position, which heavily relies on attributes like upper-body mobility, among others—factors likely affected by shoulder surgery. Offensive players experienced initial declines in performance but returned to near baseline by the second season. Older players generally returned sooner as the result of greater familiarity with injury management and shorter competitive career windows.

Clinical Relevance

This study provides insight into the positional and age-related differences in recovery and performance among NHL players following shoulder surgery, highlighting the need for tailored rehabilitation protocols to optimize return-to-play outcomes.
目的研究2000 - 2020年美国国家冰球联盟(NHL)运动员肩部手术后的比赛恢复率(RTP)和表现水平。方法从prosportstransactions.com收集2000 - 2020年NHL运动员肩部手术的数据。我们分析了1个赛季的手术前和2个赛季的手术后的表现指标,包括射门、上场时间、扑救和平均进球。非参数方差分析和事后检验评估了性能变化。结果1047名运动员中,120名符合入选标准。中锋的身体质量指数较高(平均= 26.7,P = 0.03),而守门员的身体质量指数较低(平均= 24.7,P = 0.008)。后卫在职业生涯后期受伤,而前锋在手术后的职业生涯较短。平均RTP为235天,后卫回归较早(203天,P = 0.008),守门员回归较长(437天,P = 0.008)。前锋的射门次数/出场场次在手术后有所下降,而后卫的上场时间/出场场次保持稳定。不同位置的球员每个赛季的比赛场次没有显著差异。每增加1岁,RTP减少7.5天(P = 0.04)。结论NHL球员肩部手术后的恢复时间和表现因位置而异,但差异无统计学意义。防守者的RTP最短,表现稳定,这表明防守耐力和防守贡献最小。守门员需要更长时间的RTP,这可能是由于他们的位置对身体的要求,这在很大程度上依赖于上肢的灵活性等属性,而这些因素可能受到肩部手术的影响。进攻球员经历了最初的表现下降,但在第二个赛季恢复到接近基线。由于更熟悉伤病管理和更短的职业生涯窗口,年龄较大的球员通常会更快地复出。临床相关性本研究深入研究了NHL运动员肩部手术后恢复和表现的位置和年龄相关差异,强调了定制康复方案以优化恢复结果的必要性。
{"title":"Players in the National Hockey League Experience Position-Specific Variations in Recovery and Performance After Shoulder Surgery","authors":"Shaunak S. Digambar M.S. ,&nbsp;Hayden Hartman B.S. ,&nbsp;Daniel Walsh M.D. ,&nbsp;Shreya M. Saraf M.S. ,&nbsp;Mia V. Rumps M.S. ,&nbsp;Rob Hand ,&nbsp;Mary K. Mulcahey M.D.","doi":"10.1016/j.asmr.2025.101153","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.asmr.2025.101153","url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Purpose</h3><div>To determine the rate of return to play (RTP) and level of performance in National Hockey League (NHL) players after shoulder surgery from 2000 to 2020.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>Data on NHL players undergoing shoulder surgery from 2000 to 2020 were collected from <span><span>prosportstransactions.com</span><svg><path></path></svg></span>. Performance metrics, including shots on goal, time on ice, saves, and goals against average, were analyzed for 1 season presurgery and 2 seasons postsurgery. Nonparametric analysis of variance and post-hoc tests assessed performance changes.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Of 1,047 players, 120 met inclusion criteria. Centers had greater body mass index (mean = 26.7, <em>P</em> = .03), whereas goalies had lower body mass index(mean = 24.7, <em>P</em> = .008). Defenders sustained injuries later in their careers, whereas forwards had shorter careers after surgery. Average RTP was 235 days, with defenders returning sooner (203 days, <em>P</em> &lt; .001) and goalies taking longer (437 days, <em>P</em> = .008). Forwards’ shots on goal/games played declined after surgery, whereas defenders’ time on ice/games played remained stable. No significant difference in games played per season was observed across positions. Each additional year of age reduced RTP by 7.5 days (<em>P</em> = 0.04).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>Recovery times and performance after shoulder surgery in NHL players vary by position, although differences were statistically insignificant. Defenders had shortest RTP with stable performance, suggesting minimal impact endurance and defensive contributions. Goalies required longer RTP likely as the result of the physical demands of their position, which heavily relies on attributes like upper-body mobility, among others—factors likely affected by shoulder surgery. Offensive players experienced initial declines in performance but returned to near baseline by the second season. Older players generally returned sooner as the result of greater familiarity with injury management and shorter competitive career windows.</div></div><div><h3>Clinical Relevance</h3><div>This study provides insight into the positional and age-related differences in recovery and performance among NHL players following shoulder surgery, highlighting the need for tailored rehabilitation protocols to optimize return-to-play outcomes.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":34631,"journal":{"name":"Arthroscopy Sports Medicine and Rehabilitation","volume":"7 4","pages":"Article 101153"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2025-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144934135","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
No Difference in Pain Levels and Functional Outcomes After Primary Hip Arthroscopy With Labral Repair Versus Labral Augmentation at Minimum 1-Year Follow-Up 在至少1年的随访中,初级髋关节镜下唇瓣修复术与唇瓣隆胸术的疼痛水平和功能结果无差异
Q3 Medicine Pub Date : 2025-08-01 DOI: 10.1016/j.asmr.2025.101175
Ryan S. Marder M.D. , Daniel J. Garcia B.S. , Sydney M. Fasulo M.D. , Sean M. Richards B.A. , Nicolas J. Nadeau B.S. , Matthew J. Kraeutler M.D. , Anthony J. Scillia M.D.

Purpose

To retrospectively compare the 1-year clinical outcomes of patients undergoing primary hip arthroscopy with labral repair (LR) versus labral augmentation (LA) for femoroacetabular impingement.

Methods

In this single-surgeon cohort study, we performed a retrospective review of prospectively collected data from patients who underwent primary hip arthroscopy with LR or LA between 2019 and 2022. LA was performed by the addition of an iliotibial band allograft to the repair construct. Indications for LA included a hypotrophic labrum, an everted labrum, or labral ossification. A survey of patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) was completed at a minimum of 1 year postoperatively. PROMs included the visual analog scale pain score; University of California, Los Angeles Activity Scale score; modified Harris Hip Score; Hip Outcome Score–Sports-Specific Subscale; and Single Assessment Numeric Evaluation. The minimal clinically important difference (MCID), substantial clinical benefit (SCB), and patient acceptable symptom state (PASS) for each PROM were compared between groups.

Results

A total of 99 patients (99 hips) were included in the final analysis (64 LR and 35 LA patients). No differences were found between the LR and LA groups in terms of demographic characteristics. There was a significantly longer time to follow-up in the LR group (26.1 ± 8.7 months in LR group vs 20.2 ± 7.9 months in LA group, P = .001). There were no significant differences between the LR and LA groups in terms of postoperative PROMs including the visual analog scale pain score (2.3 ± 2.4 vs 3.0 ± 2.7, P = .23); University of California, Los Angeles score (7.8 ± 2.3 vs 7.5 ± 2.6, P = .48); modified Harris Hip Score (77.3 ± 15.3 vs 73.8 ± 16.6, P = .30); Hip Outcome Score–Sports-Specific Subscale (79.0 ± 22.8 vs 69.2 ± 31.8, P = .08); or Single Assessment Numeric Evaluation score (84.8 ± 18.8 vs 77.0 ± 26.1, P = .10). No differences were identified between groups in terms of achieving the MCID, PASS, or SCB for the PROMs assessed. By the final follow-up, 2 patients (3.1%) in the LR group and 0 patients in the LA group underwent revision hip arthroscopy.

Conclusions

At 1-year follow-up, there were no differences in patient-reported outcomes in young active patients undergoing hip arthroscopy with LR versus LA. There were no significant differences in the sex-based subgroup analysis between LR and LA in terms of all postoperative PROMs and in achieving the MCID, PASS, or SCB for the PROMs assessed.

Level of Evidence

Level III, retrospective comparative series.
目的回顾性比较经一期髋关节镜下唇侧修复术(LR)与唇侧隆胸术(LA)治疗股髋臼撞击患者1年的临床疗效。方法在这项单外科医生队列研究中,我们对2019年至2022年期间接受LR或LA原发性髋关节镜检查的患者的前瞻性数据进行了回顾性分析。LA是通过在修复结构中添加髂胫束异体移植物来进行的。LA的适应症包括阴唇萎缩、外翻或阴唇骨化。术后至少1年完成患者报告结果测量(PROMs)的调查。prom包括视觉模拟量表疼痛评分;加州大学洛杉矶分校活动量表得分;改良Harris髋关节评分;髋关节结局评分-运动特异性亚量表;和单一评估数字评估。比较各组间各胎膜早破的最小临床重要差异(MCID)、实质临床获益(SCB)和患者可接受症状状态(PASS)。结果共纳入99例患者(99髋),其中LR 64例,LA 35例。在人口统计学特征方面,LR组和LA组之间没有发现差异。LR组随访时间明显延长(LR组26.1±8.7个月vs LA组20.2±7.9个月,P = 0.001)。LR组和LA组在术后PROMs方面无显著差异,包括视觉模拟量表疼痛评分(2.3±2.4 vs 3.0±2.7,P = 0.23);加州大学洛杉矶分校得分(7.8±2.3 vs 7.5±2.6,P = 0.48);改良Harris髋关节评分(77.3±15.3 vs 73.8±16.6,P = 0.30);髋关节结局评分-运动特异性亚量表(79.0±22.8 vs 69.2±31.8,P = .08);或单次评估数值评价得分(84.8±18.8 vs 77.0±26.1,P = 0.10)。在达到所评估的prom的MCID、PASS或SCB方面,两组之间没有发现差异。到最后随访时,LR组2例(3.1%)患者和LA组0例患者接受了翻修髋关节镜检查。结论在1年的随访中,年轻活动期患者接受LR和LA髋关节镜检查的患者报告的结果没有差异。在基于性别的亚组分析中,LR和LA在所有术后prom以及所评估prom的MCID、PASS或SCB的实现方面没有显著差异。证据水平:III级,回顾性比较系列。
{"title":"No Difference in Pain Levels and Functional Outcomes After Primary Hip Arthroscopy With Labral Repair Versus Labral Augmentation at Minimum 1-Year Follow-Up","authors":"Ryan S. Marder M.D. ,&nbsp;Daniel J. Garcia B.S. ,&nbsp;Sydney M. Fasulo M.D. ,&nbsp;Sean M. Richards B.A. ,&nbsp;Nicolas J. Nadeau B.S. ,&nbsp;Matthew J. Kraeutler M.D. ,&nbsp;Anthony J. Scillia M.D.","doi":"10.1016/j.asmr.2025.101175","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.asmr.2025.101175","url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Purpose</h3><div>To retrospectively compare the 1-year clinical outcomes of patients undergoing primary hip arthroscopy with labral repair (LR) versus labral augmentation (LA) for femoroacetabular impingement.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>In this single-surgeon cohort study, we performed a retrospective review of prospectively collected data from patients who underwent primary hip arthroscopy with LR or LA between 2019 and 2022. LA was performed by the addition of an iliotibial band allograft to the repair construct. Indications for LA included a hypotrophic labrum, an everted labrum, or labral ossification. A survey of patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) was completed at a minimum of 1 year postoperatively. PROMs included the visual analog scale pain score; University of California, Los Angeles Activity Scale score; modified Harris Hip Score; Hip Outcome Score–Sports-Specific Subscale; and Single Assessment Numeric Evaluation. The minimal clinically important difference (MCID), substantial clinical benefit (SCB), and patient acceptable symptom state (PASS) for each PROM were compared between groups.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>A total of 99 patients (99 hips) were included in the final analysis (64 LR and 35 LA patients). No differences were found between the LR and LA groups in terms of demographic characteristics. There was a significantly longer time to follow-up in the LR group (26.1 ± 8.7 months in LR group vs 20.2 ± 7.9 months in LA group, <em>P</em> = .001). There were no significant differences between the LR and LA groups in terms of postoperative PROMs including the visual analog scale pain score (2.3 ± 2.4 vs 3.0 ± 2.7, <em>P</em> = .23); University of California, Los Angeles score (7.8 ± 2.3 vs 7.5 ± 2.6, <em>P</em> = .48); modified Harris Hip Score (77.3 ± 15.3 vs 73.8 ± 16.6, <em>P</em> = .30); Hip Outcome Score–Sports-Specific Subscale (79.0 ± 22.8 vs 69.2 ± 31.8, <em>P</em> = .08); or Single Assessment Numeric Evaluation score (84.8 ± 18.8 vs 77.0 ± 26.1, <em>P</em> = .10). No differences were identified between groups in terms of achieving the MCID, PASS, or SCB for the PROMs assessed. By the final follow-up, 2 patients (3.1%) in the LR group and 0 patients in the LA group underwent revision hip arthroscopy.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>At 1-year follow-up, there were no differences in patient-reported outcomes in young active patients undergoing hip arthroscopy with LR versus LA. There were no significant differences in the sex-based subgroup analysis between LR and LA in terms of all postoperative PROMs and in achieving the MCID, PASS, or SCB for the PROMs assessed.</div></div><div><h3>Level of Evidence</h3><div>Level III, retrospective comparative series.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":34631,"journal":{"name":"Arthroscopy Sports Medicine and Rehabilitation","volume":"7 4","pages":"Article 101175"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2025-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144934054","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Informational Quality of YouTube Content on Partial Meniscectomy Remains Inadequate 关于半月板部分切除术的YouTube内容的信息质量仍然不足
Q3 Medicine Pub Date : 2025-08-01 DOI: 10.1016/j.asmr.2025.101192
Shankar S. Thiru B.S. , Nicholas E. Aksu M.D. , Gregorio Baek B.S. , Theodore A. Joaquin B.S. , Gregory T. Perraut M.D. , William F. Postma M.D.

Purpose

To assess the quality of YouTube videos regarding partial meniscectomy.

Methods

The first 50 videos returned by the keyword search “partial meniscectomy” after screening for inclusion and exclusion criteria were included in the study. Off-topic videos, non-English language videos, duplicated videos, YouTube Shorts, and videos with poor audio quality were excluded. The primary outcomes were the DISCERN instrument (range, 15-75), Journal of American Medical Association (JAMA) benchmark criteria (range, 0-4), and Global Quality Scale (GQS) (range, 0-5). In addition, date of publication, video duration, number of likes, number of comments, and number of views were recorded. Videos were also categorized by source type (physicians, companies, or patients), subject (surgical technique, patient experience, or overview), and content (educational or subjective patient experience).

Results

Of the 50 videos, 24 (46.0%) were published by physicians; 20 (40.0%), by companies; and 6 (14.0%), by patients. The most prevalent type of information was an overview (44.0%); 86% of the videos were educational in nature, whereas the remaining 14% described subjective patient experiences. The mean video length was 5.07 ± 0.21 minutes. The mean number of views was 1,624,827.44 ± 8,334.86; the mean number of comments, 191.62 ± 34.11; and the mean number of likes, 25,984.84 ± 1,051.76. The mean DISCERN, JAMA, and GQS scores were 45.005 ± 1.75 (95% confidence interval [CI], 44.74-45.49; range, 15-75), 1.83 ± 0.52 (95% CI, 1.68-1.97; range, 0-4), and 2.97 ± 0.52 (95% CI, 2.83-3.11; range, 1-5) respectively. For the JAMA score and GQS score, videos published by physicians had greater quality (both P = .01). Finally, overview videos were of the highest quality regarding all scores (P < .01 to P = .03), whereas educational content had higher quality than patient experience content (P < .01).

Conclusions

The overall quality of YouTube videos concerning partial meniscectomy remains poor to suboptimal. Currently, YouTube is not an appropriate resource for orthopaedic patients seeking information about partial meniscectomy.

Clinical Relevance

YouTube is not an appropriate resource for orthopaedic patients seeking information about partial meniscectomy.
目的评价半月板部分切除术YouTube视频的质量。方法筛选纳入和排除标准后,通过关键词搜索“半月板部分切除术”返回的前50个视频纳入研究。不包括离题视频、非英语视频、重复视频、YouTube短片和音质较差的视频。主要结果为DISCERN仪器(范围15-75)、美国医学会杂志(JAMA)基准标准(范围0-4)和全球质量量表(GQS)(范围0-5)。此外,还记录了发布日期、视频时长、点赞数、评论数和观看数。视频还按来源类型(医生、公司或患者)、主题(手术技术、患者体验或概述)和内容(教育或主观患者体验)进行分类。结果50个视频中,24个(46.0%)由医师发布;20个(40.0%),公司;6例(14.0%)。最普遍的信息类型是概述(44.0%);86%的视频本质上是教育性的,而剩下的14%描述的是患者的主观体验。平均视频长度为5.07±0.21分钟。平均观看次数为1,624,827.44±8,334.86;平均评论数为191.62±34.11条;平均点赞数为25984.84±1051.76。平均DISCERN、JAMA和GQS评分分别为45.005±1.75(95%可信区间[CI], 44.74-45.49;范围,15-75)、1.83±0.52 (95% CI, 1.68-1.97;范围,0-4)和2.97±0.52 (95% CI, 2.83-3.11;范围,1-5)。对于JAMA评分和GQS评分,医生发布的视频质量更高(P = 0.01)。最后,概述视频在所有评分中质量最高(P <; 0.01至P = .03),而教育内容的质量高于患者体验内容(P < 0.01)。结论YouTube半月板部分切除术视频的整体质量仍然较差。目前,YouTube不是骨科患者寻求半月板部分切除术信息的合适资源。临床相关性youtube不是骨科患者寻求半月板部分切除术信息的合适资源。
{"title":"Informational Quality of YouTube Content on Partial Meniscectomy Remains Inadequate","authors":"Shankar S. Thiru B.S. ,&nbsp;Nicholas E. Aksu M.D. ,&nbsp;Gregorio Baek B.S. ,&nbsp;Theodore A. Joaquin B.S. ,&nbsp;Gregory T. Perraut M.D. ,&nbsp;William F. Postma M.D.","doi":"10.1016/j.asmr.2025.101192","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.asmr.2025.101192","url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Purpose</h3><div>To assess the quality of YouTube videos regarding partial meniscectomy.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>The first 50 videos returned by the keyword search “partial meniscectomy” after screening for inclusion and exclusion criteria were included in the study. Off-topic videos, non-English language videos, duplicated videos, YouTube Shorts, and videos with poor audio quality were excluded. The primary outcomes were the DISCERN instrument (range, 15-75), <em>Journal of American Medical Association</em> (JAMA) benchmark criteria (range, 0-4), and Global Quality Scale (GQS) (range, 0-5). In addition, date of publication, video duration, number of likes, number of comments, and number of views were recorded. Videos were also categorized by source type (physicians, companies, or patients), subject (surgical technique, patient experience, or overview), and content (educational or subjective patient experience).</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Of the 50 videos, 24 (46.0%) were published by physicians; 20 (40.0%), by companies; and 6 (14.0%), by patients. The most prevalent type of information was an overview (44.0%); 86% of the videos were educational in nature, whereas the remaining 14% described subjective patient experiences. The mean video length was 5.07 ± 0.21 minutes. The mean number of views was 1,624,827.44 ± 8,334.86; the mean number of comments, 191.62 ± 34.11; and the mean number of likes, 25,984.84 ± 1,051.76. The mean DISCERN, JAMA, and GQS scores were 45.005 ± 1.75 (95% confidence interval [CI], 44.74-45.49; range, 15-75), 1.83 ± 0.52 (95% CI, 1.68-1.97; range, 0-4), and 2.97 ± 0.52 (95% CI, 2.83-3.11; range, 1-5) respectively. For the JAMA score and GQS score, videos published by physicians had greater quality (both <em>P</em> = .01). Finally, overview videos were of the highest quality regarding all scores (<em>P</em> &lt; .01 to <em>P</em> = .03), whereas educational content had higher quality than patient experience content (<em>P</em> &lt; .01).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>The overall quality of YouTube videos concerning partial meniscectomy remains poor to suboptimal. Currently, YouTube is not an appropriate resource for orthopaedic patients seeking information about partial meniscectomy.</div></div><div><h3>Clinical Relevance</h3><div>YouTube is not an appropriate resource for orthopaedic patients seeking information about partial meniscectomy.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":34631,"journal":{"name":"Arthroscopy Sports Medicine and Rehabilitation","volume":"7 4","pages":"Article 101192"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2025-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144932476","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Google Trends Shows Increased Public Interest in Platelet-Rich Plasma Injections in All Joints: Shoulder and Knee Show Greatest Increase 谷歌趋势显示公众对所有关节富血小板血浆注射的兴趣增加:肩关节和膝关节增加最多
Q3 Medicine Pub Date : 2025-08-01 DOI: 10.1016/j.asmr.2025.101199
James Kim B.S. , Christopher Rennie B.S. , Neil Pathak M.D. , Andrew Jimenez M.D. , Arianna L. Gianakos D.O.

Purpose

To assess search term frequency of platelet-rich plasma (PRP) in multiple joints, including the shoulder, elbow, hip, knee, ankle, and foot, using Google Trends.

Methods

The following joints included were (1) shoulder, (2) elbow, (3) hip, (4) knee, (5) ankle, and (6) foot. Google Trends was utilized to obtain search trends from 2010 to 2023 for each joint. The search combinations “PRP” + “shoulder,” “elbow,” “hip,” “knee,” “ankle,” and “foot” were used, and a linear regression model was applied. Analysis of variance and post hoc Tukey honest significant difference analyses were performed to determine specific comparisons between joints.

Results

There was an increasing trend in Google queries for PRP and shoulder (R2 = 0.669, P < .001), elbow (R2 = 0.284, P < .001), hip (R2 = 0.648, P < .001), knee (R2 = 0.802, P < .001), ankle (R2 = 0.240, P < .001), and foot (R2 = 0.040, P = .009). The shoulder showed the greatest rate of growth, shown by the slope in the linear regression model, followed by the knee (0.422 and 0.421, respectively). Within the lens of percent increase, PRP in the ankle had the highest magnitude of growth, followed by the knee (1,251.27% and 163.95%, respectively). The knee joint held the highest average relative search volume of 66.38 as of 2023.

Conclusions

Each of the search terms for PRP in the shoulder, elbow, hip, knee, ankle, and foot had statistically significant trends of increasing search volume. PRP for the shoulder and knee exhibited the highest rate of growth, whereas PRP for the foot exhibited the slowest increase.

Clinical Relevance

There appears to be substantial patient interest in PRP injections. The information in this study can be used by clinicians to better understand which joint injections patients may generally be interested in discussing during clinic visits. They can provide evidence-based materials to educate patients about PRP joint injections.
目的利用谷歌Trends评估富血小板血浆(PRP)在多个关节(包括肩、肘、髋、膝、踝和足)的搜索频率。方法(1)肩关节,(2)肘关节,(3)髋关节,(4)膝关节,(5)踝关节,(6)足关节。利用谷歌Trends获取各节点2010 - 2023年的搜索趋势。使用搜索组合“PRP”+“肩膀”、“肘部”、“臀部”、“膝盖”、“脚踝”和“脚”,并采用线性回归模型。进行方差分析和事后Tukey诚实显著差异分析,以确定关节之间的具体比较。结果谷歌对PRP和肩部(R2 = 0.669, P < .001)、肘部(R2 = 0.284, P < .001)、髋部(R2 = 0.648, P < .001)、膝关节(R2 = 0.802, P < .001)、踝关节(R2 = 0.240, P < .001)、足部(R2 = 0.040, P = 0.009)的查询呈增加趋势。线性回归模型中的斜率显示,肩部的生长速度最大,其次是膝盖(分别为0.422和0.421)。在百分比增加的范围内,踝关节的PRP增长幅度最大,其次是膝关节(分别为1,251.27%和163.95%)。截至2023年,膝关节的平均相对搜索量最高,为66.38。结论肩关节、肘关节、髋关节、膝关节、踝关节和足部PRP的搜索量有统计学意义的增加趋势。肩关节和膝关节的PRP增长最快,而足部的PRP增长最慢。临床相关性似乎有大量患者对PRP注射感兴趣。本研究中的信息可用于临床医生更好地了解哪些关节注射患者通常可能有兴趣讨论在门诊就诊。他们可以提供循证材料来教育患者关于PRP关节注射。
{"title":"Google Trends Shows Increased Public Interest in Platelet-Rich Plasma Injections in All Joints: Shoulder and Knee Show Greatest Increase","authors":"James Kim B.S. ,&nbsp;Christopher Rennie B.S. ,&nbsp;Neil Pathak M.D. ,&nbsp;Andrew Jimenez M.D. ,&nbsp;Arianna L. Gianakos D.O.","doi":"10.1016/j.asmr.2025.101199","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.asmr.2025.101199","url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Purpose</h3><div>To assess search term frequency of platelet-rich plasma (PRP) in multiple joints, including the shoulder, elbow, hip, knee, ankle, and foot, using Google Trends.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>The following joints included were (1) shoulder, (2) elbow, (3) hip, (4) knee, (5) ankle, and (6) foot. Google Trends was utilized to obtain search trends from 2010 to 2023 for each joint. The search combinations “PRP” + “shoulder,” “elbow,” “hip,” “knee,” “ankle,” and “foot” were used, and a linear regression model was applied. Analysis of variance and post hoc Tukey honest significant difference analyses were performed to determine specific comparisons between joints.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>There was an increasing trend in Google queries for PRP and shoulder (<em>R</em><sup>2</sup> = 0.669, <em>P</em> &lt; .001), elbow (<em>R</em><sup>2</sup> = 0.284, <em>P</em> &lt; .001), hip (<em>R</em><sup>2</sup> = 0.648, <em>P</em> &lt; .001), knee (<em>R</em><sup>2</sup> = 0.802, <em>P</em> &lt; .001), ankle (<em>R</em><sup>2</sup> = 0.240, <em>P</em> &lt; .001), and foot (<em>R</em><sup>2</sup> = 0.040, <em>P</em> = .009). The shoulder showed the greatest rate of growth, shown by the slope in the linear regression model, followed by the knee (0.422 and 0.421, respectively). Within the lens of percent increase, PRP in the ankle had the highest magnitude of growth, followed by the knee (1,251.27% and 163.95%, respectively). The knee joint held the highest average relative search volume of 66.38 as of 2023.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>Each of the search terms for PRP in the shoulder, elbow, hip, knee, ankle, and foot had statistically significant trends of increasing search volume. PRP for the shoulder and knee exhibited the highest rate of growth, whereas PRP for the foot exhibited the slowest increase.</div></div><div><h3>Clinical Relevance</h3><div>There appears to be substantial patient interest in PRP injections. The information in this study can be used by clinicians to better understand which joint injections patients may generally be interested in discussing during clinic visits. They can provide evidence-based materials to educate patients about PRP joint injections.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":34631,"journal":{"name":"Arthroscopy Sports Medicine and Rehabilitation","volume":"7 4","pages":"Article 101199"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2025-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144933719","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Angiotensinogen II Receptor Blockers May Decrease Risk of Adhesive Capsulitis After Rotator Cuff Repair 血管紧张素原受体阻滞剂可降低肩袖修复后粘连性囊炎的风险
Q3 Medicine Pub Date : 2025-08-01 DOI: 10.1016/j.asmr.2025.101165
Cody S. Lee M.D. , Jordan Cook Serotte M.D. , Sai Reddy B.S. , Lewis Shi M.D. , Nicholas H. Maassen M.D.

Purpose

To determine the effect of commonly prescribed antifibrotic medications on the odds of developing adhesive capsulitis (AC) following arthroscopic rotator cuff repair.

Methods

The Mariner data set of the PearlDiver database from 2010 to 2022 was used to identify patients aged 40 to 65 years who underwent rotator cuff repair (identified by Current Procedural Terminology codes) with an ipsilateral rotator cuff tear (identified by International Classification of Diseases, 10th Revision codes). Patients were required to have filled a prescription for only one of the following medications before and within 3 months of surgery: angiotensin II receptor blockers (ARBs), angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors, cyclooxygenase 2 inhibitors, and statins. Patients who developed ipsilateral AC within 6 months after surgery were identified using International Classification of Diseases codes. Additionally, all patients who underwent a manipulation under anesthesia (MUA) and/or arthroscopic lysis of adhesions (LOA) within 6 months of diagnosis of AC were identified using Current Procedural Terminology codes.

Results

A total of 183,563 patients met study inclusion criteria and were stratified based on the development of postoperative AC. The baseline characteristics (age, sex, smoking status, and diabetes and obesity prevalence) between the 2 groups were statistically different, except for the Charlson Comorbidity Index. In total, 4.62% (8,485/183,563) developed postoperative AC, and 8.5% (717/8,485) and 5.2% (438/8,485) of patients who developed AC underwent subsequent MUA and LOA, respectively. Patients on an ARB had an odds ratio of 0.87 (P = .04) for the development of AC. No other medication usage had a significant change in odds for the development of AC, nor did any medication have a change in odds of undergoing MUA or LOA.

Conclusions

Patients on an ARB had lower odds of being diagnosed with AC within 6 months of surgery. Once diagnosed with AC, there was no difference in odds of undergoing MUA or LOA among any of the medication groups.

Level of Evidence

Level III, retrospective cohort study.
目的探讨常用抗纤维化药物对关节镜下肩袖修复术后粘连性囊炎(AC)发生率的影响。方法采用2010 - 2022年PearlDiver数据库Mariner数据集,对40 - 65岁同侧肩袖撕裂(国际疾病分类,第10版代码)行肩袖修复(现行程序术语代码识别)的患者进行识别。患者被要求在手术前和手术后3个月内只服用以下药物中的一种:血管紧张素II受体阻滞剂(ARBs)、血管紧张素转换酶抑制剂、环氧化酶2抑制剂和他汀类药物。术后6个月内发生同侧AC的患者使用国际疾病分类代码进行鉴定。此外,所有在AC诊断后6个月内接受麻醉下操作(MUA)和/或关节镜下粘连松解(LOA)的患者均使用现行程序术语代码进行鉴定。结果共有183563例患者符合研究纳入标准,并根据术后AC的发生情况进行分层。除Charlson合并症指数外,两组患者的基线特征(年龄、性别、吸烟状况、糖尿病和肥胖患病率)均有统计学差异。总的来说,4.62%(8,485/183,563)的患者发生了术后AC, 8.5%(717/8,485)和5.2%(438/8,485)的患者发生了术后MUA和LOA。服用ARB的患者发生AC的优势比为0.87 (P = 0.04)。其他药物的使用对发生AC的几率没有显著影响,也没有任何药物对发生MUA或LOA的几率有影响。结论接受ARB治疗的患者在手术后6个月内被诊断为AC的几率较低。一旦被诊断为AC,在任何药物组中,接受MUA或LOA的几率没有差异。证据水平:III级,回顾性队列研究。
{"title":"Angiotensinogen II Receptor Blockers May Decrease Risk of Adhesive Capsulitis After Rotator Cuff Repair","authors":"Cody S. Lee M.D. ,&nbsp;Jordan Cook Serotte M.D. ,&nbsp;Sai Reddy B.S. ,&nbsp;Lewis Shi M.D. ,&nbsp;Nicholas H. Maassen M.D.","doi":"10.1016/j.asmr.2025.101165","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.asmr.2025.101165","url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Purpose</h3><div>To determine the effect of commonly prescribed antifibrotic medications on the odds of developing adhesive capsulitis (AC) following arthroscopic rotator cuff repair.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>The Mariner data set of the PearlDiver database from 2010 to 2022 was used to identify patients aged 40 to 65 years who underwent rotator cuff repair (identified by Current Procedural Terminology codes) with an ipsilateral rotator cuff tear (identified by International Classification of Diseases, 10th Revision codes). Patients were required to have filled a prescription for only one of the following medications before and within 3 months of surgery: angiotensin II receptor blockers (ARBs), angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors, cyclooxygenase 2 inhibitors, and statins. Patients who developed ipsilateral AC within 6 months after surgery were identified using International Classification of Diseases codes. Additionally, all patients who underwent a manipulation under anesthesia (MUA) and/or arthroscopic lysis of adhesions (LOA) within 6 months of diagnosis of AC were identified using Current Procedural Terminology codes.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>A total of 183,563 patients met study inclusion criteria and were stratified based on the development of postoperative AC. The baseline characteristics (age, sex, smoking status, and diabetes and obesity prevalence) between the 2 groups were statistically different, except for the Charlson Comorbidity Index. In total, 4.62% (8,485/183,563) developed postoperative AC, and 8.5% (717/8,485) and 5.2% (438/8,485) of patients who developed AC underwent subsequent MUA and LOA, respectively. Patients on an ARB had an odds ratio of 0.87 (<em>P</em> = .04) for the development of AC. No other medication usage had a significant change in odds for the development of AC, nor did any medication have a change in odds of undergoing MUA or LOA.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>Patients on an ARB had lower odds of being diagnosed with AC within 6 months of surgery. Once diagnosed with AC, there was no difference in odds of undergoing MUA or LOA among any of the medication groups.</div></div><div><h3>Level of Evidence</h3><div>Level III, retrospective cohort study.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":34631,"journal":{"name":"Arthroscopy Sports Medicine and Rehabilitation","volume":"7 4","pages":"Article 101165"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2025-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144934049","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Risks of Intra-articular Hip Corticosteroid Injections Include Rapidly Progressive Osteoarthritis and Femoral Head Collapse in Patients With and Without Pre-existing Osteoarthritis: A Systematic Review 髋关节关节内皮质类固醇注射的风险包括有或无骨关节炎患者的快速进行性骨关节炎和股骨头塌陷:一项系统综述
Q3 Medicine Pub Date : 2025-08-01 DOI: 10.1016/j.asmr.2025.101169
Dylan Parry B.S. , Jaydeep Dhillon D.O. , Matthew J. Kraeutler M.D.

Purpose

To identify studies reporting cartilage-related complications associated with hip intra-articular corticosteroid injections (IACSIs).

Methods

A systematic review was conducted according to Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses guidelines by searching PubMed, the Cochrane Library, and Embase to identify any study or case report reporting on cartilage-related complications after IACSIs. The search terms used were as follows: hip AND injection AND corticosteroid. Inclusion criteria included any study or case report reporting on cartilage-related complications after IACSIs. Studies were excluded if they were unrelated to the hip joint, performed injection into the soft tissue surrounding the hip joint, and/or did not report on any complications after corticosteroid injection into the hip joint. The outcomes assessed were rapidly progressive osteoarthritis (RPOA), osteonecrosis (ON), femoral head collapse (FHC), insufficiency fracture (IF), and worsening osteoarthritis (WOA) in patients with and without pre-existing osteoarthritis (OA).

Results

Twenty studies (1 Level II, 12 Level III, 3 Level IV, 4 Level V) met the inclusion criteria, with a total of 34,367 hips that underwent IACSIs. The mean patient age ranged from 50.0 to 78.0 years, the average body mass index ranged from 26.3 to 31.4, and the overall percentage of female patients ranged from 5.5% to 100%. Excluding case reports, the RPOA incidence ranged from 0.2% to 21.1%; ON incidence, from 0.6% to 27.1%; FHC incidence, from 3.2% to 20.4%; IF incidence, from 0.4% to 1.3%; and WOA incidence, from 1.1% to 44.3%.

Conclusions

Risks of IACSI include RPOA, ON, FHC, IF, and WOA, although the incidence rates of these outcomes vary notably. Adverse outcomes occur in patients without pre-existing OA, but most of the available literature reports these outcomes in patients with pre-existing OA.

Level of Evidence

Level V, systematic review of Level II to V studies.
目的探讨髋关节关节内皮质类固醇注射(IACSIs)相关软骨并发症的相关研究。方法根据系统评价和荟萃分析的首选报告项目指南,检索PubMed、Cochrane图书馆和Embase,对iacsi术后软骨相关并发症的研究或病例报告进行系统评价。使用的搜索词如下:髋关节注射和皮质类固醇。纳入标准包括任何关于IACSIs术后软骨相关并发症的研究或病例报告。如果研究与髋关节无关,在髋关节周围软组织进行注射,和/或没有报告在髋关节注射皮质类固醇后的任何并发症,则排除研究。评估的结果是有或不存在骨关节炎(OA)的患者的快速进行性骨关节炎(RPOA)、骨坏死(ON)、股骨头塌陷(FHC)、不完全性骨折(IF)和恶化的骨关节炎(WOA)。结果20项研究(1项II级研究,12项III级研究,3项IV级研究,4项V级研究)符合纳入标准,共34,367髋行IACSIs。患者平均年龄为50.0 ~ 78.0岁,平均体重指数为26.3 ~ 31.4,女性患者总体比例为5.5% ~ 100%。排除病例报告,RPOA发病率从0.2%到21.1%不等;ON发病率从0.6%降至27.1%;FHC发病率从3.2%降至20.4%;IF发病率从0.4%降至1.3%;WOA发生率从1.1%上升到44.3%。结论IACSI的风险包括RPOA、ON、FHC、IF和WOA,但这些风险的发生率差异较大。不良结果发生在没有既往性骨关节炎的患者中,但大多数现有文献报道这些结果发生在既往性骨关节炎患者中。证据等级:V级,对II至V级研究的系统评价。
{"title":"Risks of Intra-articular Hip Corticosteroid Injections Include Rapidly Progressive Osteoarthritis and Femoral Head Collapse in Patients With and Without Pre-existing Osteoarthritis: A Systematic Review","authors":"Dylan Parry B.S. ,&nbsp;Jaydeep Dhillon D.O. ,&nbsp;Matthew J. Kraeutler M.D.","doi":"10.1016/j.asmr.2025.101169","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.asmr.2025.101169","url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Purpose</h3><div>To identify studies reporting cartilage-related complications associated with hip intra-articular corticosteroid injections (IACSIs).</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>A systematic review was conducted according to Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses guidelines by searching PubMed, the Cochrane Library, and Embase to identify any study or case report reporting on cartilage-related complications after IACSIs. The search terms used were as follows: hip AND injection AND corticosteroid. Inclusion criteria included any study or case report reporting on cartilage-related complications after IACSIs. Studies were excluded if they were unrelated to the hip joint, performed injection into the soft tissue surrounding the hip joint, and/or did not report on any complications after corticosteroid injection into the hip joint. The outcomes assessed were rapidly progressive osteoarthritis (RPOA), osteonecrosis (ON), femoral head collapse (FHC), insufficiency fracture (IF), and worsening osteoarthritis (WOA) in patients with and without pre-existing osteoarthritis (OA).</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Twenty studies (1 Level II, 12 Level III, 3 Level IV, 4 Level V) met the inclusion criteria, with a total of 34,367 hips that underwent IACSIs. The mean patient age ranged from 50.0 to 78.0 years, the average body mass index ranged from 26.3 to 31.4, and the overall percentage of female patients ranged from 5.5% to 100%. Excluding case reports, the RPOA incidence ranged from 0.2% to 21.1%; ON incidence, from 0.6% to 27.1%; FHC incidence, from 3.2% to 20.4%; IF incidence, from 0.4% to 1.3%; and WOA incidence, from 1.1% to 44.3%.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>Risks of IACSI include RPOA, ON, FHC, IF, and WOA, although the incidence rates of these outcomes vary notably. Adverse outcomes occur in patients without pre-existing OA, but most of the available literature reports these outcomes in patients with pre-existing OA.</div></div><div><h3>Level of Evidence</h3><div>Level V, systematic review of Level II to V studies.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":34631,"journal":{"name":"Arthroscopy Sports Medicine and Rehabilitation","volume":"7 4","pages":"Article 101169"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2025-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144934139","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Handheld Dynamometry Shows Moderate Reliability and Responsiveness in Assessing Shoulder Muscle Strength After Rotator Cuff Repair 手持式测力法在评估肩袖修复后肩部肌肉力量时显示出中等的可靠性和反应性
Q3 Medicine Pub Date : 2025-08-01 DOI: 10.1016/j.asmr.2025.101211
Hirotomo Shibahashi O.T.R., Ph.D. , Miyuki Murakawa O.T.R., Ph.D. , Issei Yuki M.D. , Tomohiro Uno M.D., Ph.D. , Kanta Ohno O.T.R., Ph.D. , Michiaki Takagi M.D., Ph.D. , Yuya Takakubo M.D., Ph.D.

Purpose

To evaluate both the reliability and responsiveness of handheld dynamometry (HHD) in assessing shoulder external rotation, flexion, and internal rotation strength during long-term follow-up in patients following rotator cuff repair and to provide evidence for the clinical utility of HHD in this context.

Methods

This retrospective study investigated patients who underwent arthroscopic rotator cuff repair between 2014 and 2019. Patients with repeat tears were excluded. Muscle strength was assessed preoperatively and at 6, 12, 18, and 24 months postoperatively using a handheld dynamometer. Test-retest reliability was evaluated using intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs) from linear mixed-effects models, while responsiveness was assessed via minimal clinically important difference (MCID) calculations. Missing data were handled with multiple imputations, and statistical analyses were performed using R.

Results

A total of 124 patients (mean age: 64.4 ± 9.8 years) were included, with 69.4% of surgeries performed on the right shoulder. Moderate reliability of HHD was shown for muscle strength measurements, with intraclass correlation coefficients ranging from 0.59 to 0.69. Muscle strength and MCID achievement rates improved significantly over 24 months (P < .001). For 90° of abduction, muscle strength increased from 47.4 ± 42.6 N preoperatively to 103.2 ± 45.9 N at 24 months postoperatively, while the rate of MCID achievement at 24 months postoperatively was 80.7%.

Conclusions

HHD showed moderate reliability and responsiveness in assessing shoulder muscle strength after arthroscopic rotator cuff repair. Significant improvements in muscle strength and MCID achievement rates were observed over 24 months, suggesting the potential utility of HHD for monitoring recovery in this patient population.

Level of Evidence

Level IV, retrospective diagnostic case series.
目的:在肩袖修复术后患者的长期随访中,评估手持式测力法(HHD)在评估肩部外旋、屈曲和内旋强度方面的可靠性和响应性,并为HHD在这方面的临床应用提供证据。方法回顾性研究2014年至2019年接受关节镜下肩袖修复术的患者。反复流泪的患者被排除在外。术前及术后6、12、18、24个月用手持式测力仪评估肌力。使用线性混合效应模型的类内相关系数(ICCs)评估重测信度,而通过最小临床重要差异(MCID)计算评估反应性。结果共纳入124例患者(平均年龄:64.4±9.8岁),其中69.4%为右肩手术。HHD在肌肉力量测量中显示出中等的可靠性,类内相关系数范围为0.59至0.69。肌力和MCID成功率在24个月内显著提高(P < 0.001)。外展90°时,肌力由术前47.4±42.6 N增加至术后24个月时的103.2±45.9 N,术后24个月MCID成分率为80.7%。结论shhd在评估关节镜下肩袖修复后肩肌力量方面具有中等的可靠性和反应性。在24个月内观察到肌肉力量和MCID成功率的显着改善,表明HHD在监测该患者群体恢复方面的潜在效用。证据级别:IV级,回顾性诊断病例系列。
{"title":"Handheld Dynamometry Shows Moderate Reliability and Responsiveness in Assessing Shoulder Muscle Strength After Rotator Cuff Repair","authors":"Hirotomo Shibahashi O.T.R., Ph.D. ,&nbsp;Miyuki Murakawa O.T.R., Ph.D. ,&nbsp;Issei Yuki M.D. ,&nbsp;Tomohiro Uno M.D., Ph.D. ,&nbsp;Kanta Ohno O.T.R., Ph.D. ,&nbsp;Michiaki Takagi M.D., Ph.D. ,&nbsp;Yuya Takakubo M.D., Ph.D.","doi":"10.1016/j.asmr.2025.101211","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.asmr.2025.101211","url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Purpose</h3><div>To evaluate both the reliability and responsiveness of handheld dynamometry (HHD) in assessing shoulder external rotation, flexion, and internal rotation strength during long-term follow-up in patients following rotator cuff repair and to provide evidence for the clinical utility of HHD in this context.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>This retrospective study investigated patients who underwent arthroscopic rotator cuff repair between 2014 and 2019. Patients with repeat tears were excluded. Muscle strength was assessed preoperatively and at 6, 12, 18, and 24 months postoperatively using a handheld dynamometer. Test-retest reliability was evaluated using intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs) from linear mixed-effects models, while responsiveness was assessed via minimal clinically important difference (MCID) calculations. Missing data were handled with multiple imputations, and statistical analyses were performed using R.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>A total of 124 patients (mean age: 64.4 ± 9.8 years) were included, with 69.4% of surgeries performed on the right shoulder. Moderate reliability of HHD was shown for muscle strength measurements, with intraclass correlation coefficients ranging from 0.59 to 0.69. Muscle strength and MCID achievement rates improved significantly over 24 months (<em>P</em> &lt; .001). For 90° of abduction, muscle strength increased from 47.4 ± 42.6 N preoperatively to 103.2 ± 45.9 N at 24 months postoperatively, while the rate of MCID achievement at 24 months postoperatively was 80.7%.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>HHD showed moderate reliability and responsiveness in assessing shoulder muscle strength after arthroscopic rotator cuff repair. Significant improvements in muscle strength and MCID achievement rates were observed over 24 months, suggesting the potential utility of HHD for monitoring recovery in this patient population.</div></div><div><h3>Level of Evidence</h3><div>Level IV, retrospective diagnostic case series.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":34631,"journal":{"name":"Arthroscopy Sports Medicine and Rehabilitation","volume":"7 4","pages":"Article 101211"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2025-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144934051","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Current Relative Value Scale Methodology Underestimates Perioperative Workload in Hip Arthroscopy 目前的相对价值量表方法低估了髋关节镜手术围手术期的工作量
Q3 Medicine Pub Date : 2025-08-01 DOI: 10.1016/j.asmr.2025.101157
Shelby C. Hodges B.S. , Juan J. Gordillo B.S. , Clay A. Rahaman B.A. , Mathew Hargreaves B.S. , Maxwell L. Harrell B.S. , Dev Dayal B.S. , Thomas B. Evely D.O. , Eugene W. Brabston M.D. , Amit M. Momaya M.D. , Aaron J. Casp M.D.

Purpose

To evaluate the accuracy of the current times and work relative value units (wRVUs) recommended by the Relative Value Scale (RVS) Update Committee (RUC) for the perioperative work associated with hip arthroscopy in a single surgeon’s practice.

Methods

The RUC was contacted to obtain a list of perioperative tasks and times allotted for these tasks for hip arthroscopy procedures (Current Procedural Terminology codes 29914, 29915, and 29916). A board-certified, sports medicine fellowship–trained orthopaedic surgeon recorded the time it took to perform each perioperative task. Recorded times were multiplied by their respective Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services–assigned intensity coefficients to calculate the wRVUs for preservice and postservice tasks. Calculated and allotted wRVUs were compared for accuracy.

Results

The tasks timed in this study were allotted 83 minutes by the RUC with a wRVU of 1.72. Our study found that these same tasks significantly differed, at 93.4 minutes and total wRVU of 1.95 (P < .001). The overall time it took to perform perioperative tasks for hip arthroscopy was underestimated by 10.4 minutes, resulting in an undervaluation of wRVU by 0.23.

Conclusions

In a single surgeon’s practice, the RUC underestimates the time required to perform perioperative tasks for hip arthroscopy procedures.

Clinical Relevance

It is important to determine whether the amount surgeons are reimbursed for certain procedures, such as hip arthroscopy, is an accurate reflection of actual cost. Discrepancies between reimbursement and actual costs can influence the financial viability of offering such procedures, impacting access to care, procedural volume, and potentially long-term outcomes, particularly as health care systems move toward value-based reimbursement models.
目的评估相对价值量表(RVS)更新委员会(RUC)推荐的当前时间和工作相对价值单位(wRVUs)在单个外科医生髋关节镜围手术期工作中的准确性。方法联系中国联合医院获得髋关节镜手术(现行程序术语代码29914、29915和29916)的围手术期任务和任务分配时间清单。一位获得委员会认证、接受过运动医学奖学金培训的整形外科医生记录了完成每项围手术期任务所需的时间。记录的时间乘以他们各自的医疗保险和医疗补助服务中心分配的强度系数,以计算服务前和服务后任务的wRVUs。比较计算和分配的wrvu的准确性。结果本研究任务分配时间为83分钟,wRVU为1.72。我们的研究发现,这些相同的任务显著不同,为93.4分钟,总wRVU为1.95 (P < .001)。完成髋关节镜围手术期任务所需的总时间被低估了10.4分钟,导致wRVU被低估了0.23分钟。结论在单个外科医生的实践中,RUC低估了髋关节镜手术围手术期任务所需的时间。临床相关性确定外科医生对某些手术(如髋关节镜检查)的报销金额是否准确反映了实际成本是很重要的。报销与实际成本之间的差异可能影响提供此类程序的财务可行性,影响获得护理的机会、程序数量和潜在的长期结果,特别是在卫生保健系统转向以价值为基础的报销模式时。
{"title":"Current Relative Value Scale Methodology Underestimates Perioperative Workload in Hip Arthroscopy","authors":"Shelby C. Hodges B.S. ,&nbsp;Juan J. Gordillo B.S. ,&nbsp;Clay A. Rahaman B.A. ,&nbsp;Mathew Hargreaves B.S. ,&nbsp;Maxwell L. Harrell B.S. ,&nbsp;Dev Dayal B.S. ,&nbsp;Thomas B. Evely D.O. ,&nbsp;Eugene W. Brabston M.D. ,&nbsp;Amit M. Momaya M.D. ,&nbsp;Aaron J. Casp M.D.","doi":"10.1016/j.asmr.2025.101157","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.asmr.2025.101157","url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Purpose</h3><div>To evaluate the accuracy of the current times and work relative value units (wRVUs) recommended by the Relative Value Scale (RVS) Update Committee (RUC) for the perioperative work associated with hip arthroscopy in a single surgeon’s practice.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>The RUC was contacted to obtain a list of perioperative tasks and times allotted for these tasks for hip arthroscopy procedures (Current Procedural Terminology codes 29914, 29915, and 29916). A board-certified, sports medicine fellowship–trained orthopaedic surgeon recorded the time it took to perform each perioperative task. Recorded times were multiplied by their respective Centers for Medicare &amp; Medicaid Services–assigned intensity coefficients to calculate the wRVUs for preservice and postservice tasks. Calculated and allotted wRVUs were compared for accuracy.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>The tasks timed in this study were allotted 83 minutes by the RUC with a wRVU of 1.72. Our study found that these same tasks significantly differed, at 93.4 minutes and total wRVU of 1.95 (<em>P</em> &lt; .001). The overall time it took to perform perioperative tasks for hip arthroscopy was underestimated by 10.4 minutes, resulting in an undervaluation of wRVU by 0.23.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>In a single surgeon’s practice, the RUC underestimates the time required to perform perioperative tasks for hip arthroscopy procedures.</div></div><div><h3>Clinical Relevance</h3><div>It is important to determine whether the amount surgeons are reimbursed for certain procedures, such as hip arthroscopy, is an accurate reflection of actual cost. Discrepancies between reimbursement and actual costs can influence the financial viability of offering such procedures, impacting access to care, procedural volume, and potentially long-term outcomes, particularly as health care systems move toward value-based reimbursement models.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":34631,"journal":{"name":"Arthroscopy Sports Medicine and Rehabilitation","volume":"7 4","pages":"Article 101157"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2025-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144934052","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
期刊
Arthroscopy Sports Medicine and Rehabilitation
全部 Acc. Chem. Res. ACS Applied Bio Materials ACS Appl. Electron. Mater. ACS Appl. Energy Mater. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces ACS Appl. Nano Mater. ACS Appl. Polym. Mater. ACS BIOMATER-SCI ENG ACS Catal. ACS Cent. Sci. ACS Chem. Biol. ACS Chemical Health & Safety ACS Chem. Neurosci. ACS Comb. Sci. ACS Earth Space Chem. ACS Energy Lett. ACS Infect. Dis. ACS Macro Lett. ACS Mater. Lett. ACS Med. Chem. Lett. ACS Nano ACS Omega ACS Photonics ACS Sens. ACS Sustainable Chem. Eng. ACS Synth. Biol. Anal. Chem. BIOCHEMISTRY-US Bioconjugate Chem. BIOMACROMOLECULES Chem. Res. Toxicol. Chem. Rev. Chem. Mater. CRYST GROWTH DES ENERG FUEL Environ. Sci. Technol. Environ. Sci. Technol. Lett. Eur. J. Inorg. Chem. IND ENG CHEM RES Inorg. Chem. J. Agric. Food. Chem. J. Chem. Eng. Data J. Chem. Educ. J. Chem. Inf. Model. J. Chem. Theory Comput. J. Med. Chem. J. Nat. Prod. J PROTEOME RES J. Am. Chem. Soc. LANGMUIR MACROMOLECULES Mol. Pharmaceutics Nano Lett. Org. Lett. ORG PROCESS RES DEV ORGANOMETALLICS J. Org. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. A J. Phys. Chem. B J. Phys. Chem. C J. Phys. Chem. Lett. Analyst Anal. Methods Biomater. Sci. Catal. Sci. Technol. Chem. Commun. Chem. Soc. Rev. CHEM EDUC RES PRACT CRYSTENGCOMM Dalton Trans. Energy Environ. Sci. ENVIRON SCI-NANO ENVIRON SCI-PROC IMP ENVIRON SCI-WAT RES Faraday Discuss. Food Funct. Green Chem. Inorg. Chem. Front. Integr. Biol. J. Anal. At. Spectrom. J. Mater. Chem. A J. Mater. Chem. B J. Mater. Chem. C Lab Chip Mater. Chem. Front. Mater. Horiz. MEDCHEMCOMM Metallomics Mol. Biosyst. Mol. Syst. Des. Eng. Nanoscale Nanoscale Horiz. Nat. Prod. Rep. New J. Chem. Org. Biomol. Chem. Org. Chem. Front. PHOTOCH PHOTOBIO SCI PCCP Polym. Chem.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1