首页 > 最新文献

Arthroscopy Sports Medicine and Rehabilitation最新文献

英文 中文
The Addition of a Pericapsular Nerve Group Block for Postoperative Pain Control Does Not Result in Less Narcotic Use After Hip Arthroscopy: A Systematic Review 在髋关节镜术后疼痛控制中增加肩周神经组阻滞并不会减少麻醉药的使用:系统回顾
Q3 Medicine Pub Date : 2024-02-15 DOI: 10.1016/j.asmr.2024.100894
Grace Tanguilig B.S. , Jaydeep Dhillon B.S. , Anthony J. Scillia M.D. , Wendell M.R. Heard M.D. , Matthew J. Kraeutler M.D.

Purpose

To perform a systematic review of clinical studies evaluating the pericapsular nerve group (PENG) block in patients undergoing hip arthroscopy.

Methods

A systematic review was conducted according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines to identify comparative studies of patients undergoing the PENG block before hip arthroscopy. The search phrase used was hip arthroscopy pericapsular nerve block. Patients were evaluated based on analgesic consumption, time to discharge from the postanesthesia care unit (PACU), and pain scores (Numeric Rating Scale and visual analog scale). The Modified Coleman Methodology Score was used to evaluate study methodology quality.

Results

Five studies (2 Level I, 3 Level III) met inclusion criteria. The 5 studies included the following comparison groups: 0.9% normal saline injection, general anesthesia alone, and general anesthesia with intraoperative pericapsular bupivacaine injection. The 2 randomized controlled trials included in this review reported no significant difference between groups regarding opioid consumption. One of these did not find any statistically significant differences in their secondary outcomes either, including patient satisfaction with analgesia, opioid-related adverse events, or persistent opioid use at 1 week. However, the other 3 studies found significantly lower opioid consumption in patients receiving the PENG block versus the control group intraoperatively, in the PACU, and/or postoperatively. Four studies reported significantly lower pain levels in the PENG block group compared with the control groups, measured differently in each study: 24 hours postoperatively, initial pain score in the PACU, mean score in the PACU, and highest score in the PACU. None of the studies found significantly worse outcomes in the PENG block group compared to the comparison group.

Conclusions

Systematic review of randomized controlled trials shows that patients undergoing hip arthroscopy who receive a PENG block do not consume fewer opioids for postoperative pain control than patients who do not receive the block.

Level of Evidence

Level III, systematic review of Level I-III studies.

目的对接受髋关节镜检查的患者进行囊周神经组(PENG)阻滞的临床研究进行评估。方法根据《系统综述和元分析首选报告项目》指南进行系统综述,以确定在髋关节镜检查前接受 PENG 阻滞的患者的比较研究。搜索关键词为髋关节镜手术包膜神经阻滞。根据镇痛剂消耗量、从麻醉后护理病房(PACU)出院的时间和疼痛评分(数字评分量表和视觉模拟评分量表)对患者进行评估。结果5项研究(2项I级,3项III级)符合纳入标准。这 5 项研究包括以下对比组:0.9% 生理盐水注射组、单纯全身麻醉组和全身麻醉加术中囊周布比卡因注射组。纳入本综述的 2 项随机对照试验报告称,各组在阿片类药物的消耗量上没有明显差异。其中一项研究在次要结果(包括患者对镇痛的满意度、阿片类药物相关不良事件或持续使用阿片类药物 1 周)方面也未发现任何统计学意义上的显著差异。然而,另外 3 项研究发现,与对照组相比,接受 PENG 阻滞治疗的患者在术中、PACU 和/或术后的阿片类药物消耗量明显较低。有四项研究报告称,与对照组相比,PENG 阻滞组的疼痛水平明显降低,每项研究的测量方法都不同:术后 24 小时、PACU 中的初始疼痛评分、PACU 中的平均评分以及 PACU 中的最高评分。结论随机对照试验的系统回顾显示,接受 PENG 阻滞的髋关节镜手术患者术后止痛所消耗的阿片类药物并不比未接受阻滞的患者少。
{"title":"The Addition of a Pericapsular Nerve Group Block for Postoperative Pain Control Does Not Result in Less Narcotic Use After Hip Arthroscopy: A Systematic Review","authors":"Grace Tanguilig B.S. ,&nbsp;Jaydeep Dhillon B.S. ,&nbsp;Anthony J. Scillia M.D. ,&nbsp;Wendell M.R. Heard M.D. ,&nbsp;Matthew J. Kraeutler M.D.","doi":"10.1016/j.asmr.2024.100894","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asmr.2024.100894","url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Purpose</h3><p>To perform a systematic review of clinical studies evaluating the pericapsular nerve group (PENG) block in patients undergoing hip arthroscopy.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>A systematic review was conducted according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines to identify comparative studies of patients undergoing the PENG block before hip arthroscopy. The search phrase used was <em>hip arthroscopy pericapsular nerve block</em>. Patients were evaluated based on analgesic consumption, time to discharge from the postanesthesia care unit (PACU), and pain scores (Numeric Rating Scale and visual analog scale). The Modified Coleman Methodology Score was used to evaluate study methodology quality.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Five studies (2 Level I, 3 Level III) met inclusion criteria. The 5 studies included the following comparison groups: 0.9% normal saline injection, general anesthesia alone, and general anesthesia with intraoperative pericapsular bupivacaine injection. The 2 randomized controlled trials included in this review reported no significant difference between groups regarding opioid consumption. One of these did not find any statistically significant differences in their secondary outcomes either, including patient satisfaction with analgesia, opioid-related adverse events, or persistent opioid use at 1 week. However, the other 3 studies found significantly lower opioid consumption in patients receiving the PENG block versus the control group intraoperatively, in the PACU, and/or postoperatively. Four studies reported significantly lower pain levels in the PENG block group compared with the control groups, measured differently in each study: 24 hours postoperatively, initial pain score in the PACU, mean score in the PACU, and highest score in the PACU. None of the studies found significantly worse outcomes in the PENG block group compared to the comparison group.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>Systematic review of randomized controlled trials shows that patients undergoing hip arthroscopy who receive a PENG block do not consume fewer opioids for postoperative pain control than patients who do not receive the block.</p></div><div><h3>Level of Evidence</h3><p>Level III, systematic review of Level I-III studies.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":34631,"journal":{"name":"Arthroscopy Sports Medicine and Rehabilitation","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-02-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666061X24000129/pdfft?md5=095c6224ea11425b83c8527e6d2f1124&pid=1-s2.0-S2666061X24000129-main.pdf","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"139738117","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Low Tensile Strength Suture With Transosseous Tunnels and Suture Anchors 5 mm in Diameter or Greater Are Associated With Higher Failure Rates in Primary Patellar Tendon Repair 经骨隧道的低拉伸强度缝合线和直径大于或等于 5 毫米的缝合锚与髌腱初次修复的较高失败率有关
Q3 Medicine Pub Date : 2024-02-14 DOI: 10.1016/j.asmr.2024.100908
Mark S. Katsma D.O. , Vaughn Land M.D. , S. Hunter Renfro M.D. , Hunter Culp M.D. , George C. Balazs M.D.

Purpose

To determine the rate of and risk factors for clinical failure and return to military duty following primary patellar tendon repair with either transosseous trunnel repair or suture anchor repair.

Methods

The Military Health System Data Repository (MDR) was queried to identify all adult patients undergoing surgical treatment of a patellar tendon rupture in the Military Health System from 2014 to 2018. Patients who underwent either transosseous tunnel repair or suture anchor repair were included. Health records were examined to collect additional data. Univariate analysis and multivariate logistic regression models were used to determine independent risk factors for rerupture.

Results

A total of 450 knees in 437 patients were included. Transosseous tunnel repair was the most frequently used technique (314/450, 77%), followed by suture anchor repair (113/450, 25%). Rerupture occurred in 33 knees (7%). There was no difference in rerupture rate between transosseous tunnel repair and suture anchor repair (P = .15), and this result persisted within the multivariate logistic regression model. Among transosseous tunnel repairs, use of low tensile strength suture was an independent risk factor for repair failure (odds ratio [OR], 3.4; P = .016). Among suture anchor repairs, use of anchors 5.0 mm in diameter or greater (OR, 12.0; P = .027) was an independent risk factor for repair failure.

Conclusions

There is no statistically significant difference in failure rate between transosseous tunnel repair and suture anchor repair in primary patellar tendon ruptures. However, the use of low tensile strength suture with transosseous tunnels and the use of suture anchors 5.0 mm in diameter or greater resulted in significantly higher failure rates. These data suggest that use of high tensile strength suture in transosseous tunnel repair and use of suture anchors less than 5.0 mm in diameter in suture anchor repair result in lower failure rate in primary patellar tendon repair.

Level of Evidence

Level III, retrospective cohort study.

目的确定经骨隧道修复术或缝合锚修复术进行初级髌腱修复术后临床失败率和重返部队的风险因素。方法查询军事卫生系统数据存储库(MDR),以确定2014年至2018年期间在军事卫生系统接受髌腱断裂手术治疗的所有成年患者。其中包括接受经骨隧道修复术或缝合锚修复术的患者。检查健康记录以收集更多数据。采用单变量分析和多变量逻辑回归模型确定再断裂的独立风险因素。经骨隧道修复是最常用的技术(314/450,77%),其次是缝合锚修复(113/450,25%)。33个膝关节(7%)发生了再断裂。经骨隧道修复术和缝合锚修复术的再断裂率没有差异(P = .15),这一结果在多变量逻辑回归模型中依然存在。在经骨隧道修复中,使用低抗张强度缝线是导致修复失败的独立风险因素(几率比 [OR],3.4;P = .016)。结论在原发性髌腱断裂中,经骨隧道修复和缝合锚修复的失败率在统计学上没有显著差异。然而,在经骨隧道中使用低抗张强度缝合线以及使用直径为 5.0 毫米或更大的缝合锚会导致明显更高的失败率。这些数据表明,在经骨隧道修复中使用高强度缝合线,在缝合锚修复中使用直径小于 5.0 毫米的缝合锚,可降低原发性髌腱修复的失败率。
{"title":"Low Tensile Strength Suture With Transosseous Tunnels and Suture Anchors 5 mm in Diameter or Greater Are Associated With Higher Failure Rates in Primary Patellar Tendon Repair","authors":"Mark S. Katsma D.O. ,&nbsp;Vaughn Land M.D. ,&nbsp;S. Hunter Renfro M.D. ,&nbsp;Hunter Culp M.D. ,&nbsp;George C. Balazs M.D.","doi":"10.1016/j.asmr.2024.100908","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.asmr.2024.100908","url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Purpose</h3><p>To determine the rate of and risk factors for clinical failure and return to military duty following primary patellar tendon repair with either transosseous trunnel repair or suture anchor repair.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>The Military Health System Data Repository (MDR) was queried to identify all adult patients undergoing surgical treatment of a patellar tendon rupture in the Military Health System from 2014 to 2018. Patients who underwent either transosseous tunnel repair or suture anchor repair were included. Health records were examined to collect additional data. Univariate analysis and multivariate logistic regression models were used to determine independent risk factors for rerupture.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>A total of 450 knees in 437 patients were included. Transosseous tunnel repair was the most frequently used technique (314/450, 77%), followed by suture anchor repair (113/450, 25%). Rerupture occurred in 33 knees (7%). There was no difference in rerupture rate between transosseous tunnel repair and suture anchor repair (<em>P</em> = .15), and this result persisted within the multivariate logistic regression model. Among transosseous tunnel repairs, use of low tensile strength suture was an independent risk factor for repair failure (odds ratio [OR], 3.4; <em>P</em> = .016). Among suture anchor repairs, use of anchors 5.0 mm in diameter or greater (OR, 12.0; <em>P</em> = .027) was an independent risk factor for repair failure.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>There is no statistically significant difference in failure rate between transosseous tunnel repair and suture anchor repair in primary patellar tendon ruptures. However, the use of low tensile strength suture with transosseous tunnels and the use of suture anchors 5.0 mm in diameter or greater resulted in significantly higher failure rates. These data suggest that use of high tensile strength suture in transosseous tunnel repair and use of suture anchors less than 5.0 mm in diameter in suture anchor repair result in lower failure rate in primary patellar tendon repair.</p></div><div><h3>Level of Evidence</h3><p>Level III, retrospective cohort study.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":34631,"journal":{"name":"Arthroscopy Sports Medicine and Rehabilitation","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-02-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666061X24000269/pdfft?md5=10c587973fb95d67d80475e32cd14e5e&pid=1-s2.0-S2666061X24000269-main.pdf","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"139874353","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Traumatic and Atraumatic Rotator Cuff Tears Have the Same Rates of Healing 创伤性和非创伤性肩袖撕裂的愈合率相同
Q3 Medicine Pub Date : 2024-02-13 DOI: 10.1016/j.asmr.2023.100867
Alberto Guevara-Alvarez M.D. , Edwin A. Valencia-Ramon M.D. , Hugo Bothorel M.Eng. , Philippe Collin M.D. , Jeanni Zbinden M.D. , Alberto Guizzi M.D. , Alexandre Lädermann M.D.

Background

To examine whether traumatic rotator cuff repairs (RCRs) differ in postoperative rotator cuff tendon integrity and functional outcomes from degenerative RCRs.

Methods

RCRs performed by a single surgeon were retrospectively identified. The inclusion criteria were repairable Goutallier grades 0 to 2 full-thickness rotator cuff tears. Demographic and clinical data as well as radiological results were compared. A multivariate logistic regression of the of patient acceptable symptom state for American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons (ASES) score was performed to evaluate whether the origin of tear led to a different relative risk (RR) independently from tear and surgical characteristics.

Results

A total of 616 consecutive shoulders (304 traumatic and 312 degenerative) were finally included. Traumatic ruptures presented a greater distribution of male (72% vs 51%, P < .001) and younger patients (53 vs 57 years, P < .001), as well as earlier onset of symptoms (3 vs 15 months, P < .001), reduced range of motion in preoperative assessment for forward elevation (130° vs 150°, P < .001), and slightly greater preoperative ASES (46.5 ± 19.7 vs 50.0 ± 18.0, P = .022) and Constant (47.0 ± 20.2 vs 52.0 ± 18.9, P = .001) scores. Degenerative tears presented a lower proportion of grade 3 tendon coronal retraction (11% vs 18%, P = .031). Postoperative tendon integrity at 6 months was comparable for both groups, predominantly Sugaya types 1 and 2 (91% traumatic; 92% degenerative, P = .371). Both groups exhibited favorable outcomes in range of motion and postoperative functional scores at last follow-up. The multivariate regression confirmed that the tear origin was not significantly associated with patient acceptable symptom state achievement (P = .201) but rather with greater preoperative ASES score (RR, 1.01), men (RR, 1.16) and workers’ compensation (RR, 0.65) (P < .05).

Conclusions

Traumatic cases were frequent, involved younger patients, more frequently affected the anterior rotator cuff, and were associated with more severe tendon retraction. Traumatic and degenerative RCRs lead to comparable clinical and radiologic results.

Level of Evidence

Level III, retrospective comparative study.

背景研究创伤性肩袖修复术(RCR)与退行性肩袖修复术在术后肩袖肌腱完整性和功能结果方面是否存在差异。纳入标准为可修复的 Goutallier 0 至 2 级全厚肩袖撕裂。比较了人口统计学和临床数据以及放射学结果。对美国肩肘外科医生(ASES)评分的患者可接受症状状态进行了多变量逻辑回归,以评估撕裂起源是否会导致与撕裂和手术特征不同的相对风险(RR)。创伤性肩关节断裂患者中男性(72% 对 51%,P < .001)和年轻患者(53 岁对 57 岁,P < .001)的比例更高,而且症状出现时间更早(3 个月对 15 个月,P < .001),活动范围更小。001),术前评估向前抬高的活动范围较小(130° vs 150°,P < .001),术前 ASES(46.5 ± 19.7 vs 50.0 ± 18.0,P = .022)和 Constant(47.0 ± 20.2 vs 52.0 ± 18.9,P = .001)评分略高。退行性撕裂的肌腱冠状面3级回缩比例较低(11% vs 18%,P = .031)。术后 6 个月时,两组肌腱的完整性相当,主要是 Sugaya 1 型和 2 型(91% 为创伤性;92% 为退行性,P = .371)。最后一次随访时,两组患者的活动范围和术后功能评分均显示出良好的结果。多变量回归证实,撕裂起源与患者可接受的症状状态成就(P = .201)无显著关联,而是与术前更高的 ASES 评分(RR,1.01)、男性(RR,1.16)和工伤赔偿(RR,0.65)(P <.05)有关。创伤性和退行性 RCR 的临床和放射学结果相当。
{"title":"Traumatic and Atraumatic Rotator Cuff Tears Have the Same Rates of Healing","authors":"Alberto Guevara-Alvarez M.D. ,&nbsp;Edwin A. Valencia-Ramon M.D. ,&nbsp;Hugo Bothorel M.Eng. ,&nbsp;Philippe Collin M.D. ,&nbsp;Jeanni Zbinden M.D. ,&nbsp;Alberto Guizzi M.D. ,&nbsp;Alexandre Lädermann M.D.","doi":"10.1016/j.asmr.2023.100867","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asmr.2023.100867","url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>To examine whether traumatic rotator cuff repairs (RCRs) differ in postoperative rotator cuff tendon integrity and functional outcomes from degenerative RCRs.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>RCRs performed by a single surgeon were retrospectively identified. The inclusion criteria were repairable Goutallier grades 0 to 2 full-thickness rotator cuff tears. Demographic and clinical data as well as radiological results were compared. A multivariate logistic regression of the of patient acceptable symptom state for American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons (ASES) score was performed to evaluate whether the origin of tear led to a different relative risk (RR) independently from tear and surgical characteristics.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>A total of 616 consecutive shoulders (304 traumatic and 312 degenerative) were finally included. Traumatic ruptures presented a greater distribution of male (72% vs 51%, <em>P</em> &lt; .001) and younger patients (53 vs 57 years, <em>P</em> &lt; .001), as well as earlier onset of symptoms (3 vs 15 months, <em>P</em> &lt; .001), reduced range of motion in preoperative assessment for forward elevation (130° vs 150°, <em>P</em> &lt; .001), and slightly greater preoperative ASES (46.5 ± 19.7 vs 50.0 ± 18.0, <em>P</em> = .022) and Constant (47.0 ± 20.2 vs 52.0 ± 18.9, <em>P</em> = .001) scores. Degenerative tears presented a lower proportion of grade 3 tendon coronal retraction (11% vs 18%, <em>P</em> = .031). Postoperative tendon integrity at 6 months was comparable for both groups, predominantly Sugaya types 1 and 2 (91% traumatic; 92% degenerative, <em>P</em> = .371). Both groups exhibited favorable outcomes in range of motion and postoperative functional scores at last follow-up. The multivariate regression confirmed that the tear origin was not significantly associated with patient acceptable symptom state achievement (<em>P</em> = .201) but rather with greater preoperative ASES score (RR, 1.01), men (RR, 1.16) and workers’ compensation (RR, 0.65) (<em>P</em> &lt; .05).</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>Traumatic cases were frequent, involved younger patients, more frequently affected the anterior rotator cuff, and were associated with more severe tendon retraction. Traumatic and degenerative RCRs lead to comparable clinical and radiologic results.</p></div><div><h3>Level of Evidence</h3><p>Level III, retrospective comparative study.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":34631,"journal":{"name":"Arthroscopy Sports Medicine and Rehabilitation","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-02-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666061X23002183/pdfft?md5=d8ed767671865c7928b411902f345957&pid=1-s2.0-S2666061X23002183-main.pdf","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"139731596","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Patient Resilience Does Not Conclusively Affect Clinical Outcomes Associated With Arthroscopic Surgery but Substantial Limitations of the Literature Exist 患者的适应能力对关节镜手术的临床效果并无决定性影响,但文献资料存在很大局限性
Q3 Medicine Pub Date : 2024-02-13 DOI: 10.1016/j.asmr.2023.100812
Mikalyn T. DeFoor M.D. , Daniel J. Cognetti M.D. , Asheesh Bedi M.D. , David B. Carmack Jr. M.D. , Justin W. Arner M.D. , Steven DeFroda M.D. , Justin J. Ernat M.D., M.H.A. , Salvatore J. Frangiamore M.D., M.S. , Clayton W. Nuelle M.D. , Andrew J. Sheean M.D.

Purpose

To determine whether low resilience is predictive of worse patient-reported outcomes (PROs) or diminished improvements in clinical outcomes after joint preserving and arthroscopic surgery.

Methods

A comprehensive search of PubMed, Medline, Embase, and Science Direct was performed on September 28, 2022, for studies investigating the relationship between resilience and PROs after arthroscopic surgery in accordance with the Preferred Reported Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses guidelines.

Results

Nine articles (level II-IV studies) were included in the final analysis. A total of 887 patients (54% male, average age 45 years) underwent arthroscopic surgery, including general knee (n = 3 studies), ACLR-only knee (n = 1 study), rotator cuff repair (n = 4 studies), and hip (n = 1 study). The Brief Resilience Scale was the most common instrument measuring resilience in 7 of 9 studies (78%). Five of 9 studies (56%) stratified patients based on high, normal, or low resilience cohorts, and these stratification threshold values differed between studies. Only 4 of 9 studies (44%) measured PROs both before and after surgery. Three of 9 studies (33%) reported rates of return to activity, with 2 studies (22%) noting high resilience to be associated with a higher likelihood of return to sport/duty, specifically after knee arthroscopy. However, significant associations between resilience and functional outcomes were not consistently observed, nor was resilience consistently observed to be predictive of subjects’ capacity to return to a preinjury level of function.

Conclusions

Patient resilience is inconsistently demonstrated to affect clinical outcomes associated with joint preserving and arthroscopic surgery. However, substantial limitations in the existing literature including underpowered sample sizes, lack of standardization in stratifying patients based on pretreatment resilience, and inconsistent collection of PROs throughout the continuum of care, diminish the strength of most conclusions that have been drawn.

Level of Evidence

Level IV, systematic review of level II-IV studies.

目的 根据《系统综述和荟萃分析首选报告项目》指南,于2022年9月28日对PubMed、Medline、Embase和Science Direct进行了全面检索,以了解关节镜手术后复原力与PRO之间关系的研究。共有887名患者(54%为男性,平均年龄45岁)接受了关节镜手术,包括普通膝关节(3项研究)、单纯膝关节ACLR(1项研究)、肩袖修复(4项研究)和髋关节(1项研究)。在 9 项研究中,有 7 项(78%)采用简明复原力量表作为最常用的复原力测量工具。9 项研究中有 5 项(56%)根据高复原力、正常复原力或低复原力队列对患者进行分层,不同研究的分层阈值各不相同。9 项研究中只有 4 项(44%)在手术前后都测量了患者的 PROs。9 项研究中有 3 项(33%)报告了恢复活动的比率,其中 2 项研究(22%)指出高恢复力与恢复运动/工作的可能性较高有关,特别是在膝关节镜手术后。然而,并没有持续观察到复原力与功能结果之间的重要关联,也没有持续观察到复原力能够预测受试者恢复到受伤前功能水平的能力。然而,现有文献存在很大的局限性,包括样本量不足、根据治疗前的恢复力对患者进行分层缺乏标准化,以及在整个治疗过程中收集的PROs不一致,这些都削弱了大多数结论的说服力。
{"title":"Patient Resilience Does Not Conclusively Affect Clinical Outcomes Associated With Arthroscopic Surgery but Substantial Limitations of the Literature Exist","authors":"Mikalyn T. DeFoor M.D. ,&nbsp;Daniel J. Cognetti M.D. ,&nbsp;Asheesh Bedi M.D. ,&nbsp;David B. Carmack Jr. M.D. ,&nbsp;Justin W. Arner M.D. ,&nbsp;Steven DeFroda M.D. ,&nbsp;Justin J. Ernat M.D., M.H.A. ,&nbsp;Salvatore J. Frangiamore M.D., M.S. ,&nbsp;Clayton W. Nuelle M.D. ,&nbsp;Andrew J. Sheean M.D.","doi":"10.1016/j.asmr.2023.100812","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asmr.2023.100812","url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Purpose</h3><p>To determine whether low resilience is predictive of worse patient-reported outcomes (PROs) or diminished improvements in clinical outcomes after joint preserving and arthroscopic surgery.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>A comprehensive search of PubMed, Medline, Embase, and Science Direct was performed on September 28, 2022, for studies investigating the relationship between resilience and PROs after arthroscopic surgery in accordance with the Preferred Reported Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses guidelines.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Nine articles (level II-IV studies) were included in the final analysis. A total of 887 patients (54% male, average age 45 years) underwent arthroscopic surgery, including general knee (n = 3 studies), ACLR-only knee (n = 1 study), rotator cuff repair (n = 4 studies), and hip (n = 1 study). The Brief Resilience Scale was the most common instrument measuring resilience in 7 of 9 studies (78%). Five of 9 studies (56%) stratified patients based on high, normal, or low resilience cohorts, and these stratification threshold values differed between studies. Only 4 of 9 studies (44%) measured PROs both before and after surgery. Three of 9 studies (33%) reported rates of return to activity, with 2 studies (22%) noting high resilience to be associated with a higher likelihood of return to sport/duty, specifically after knee arthroscopy. However, significant associations between resilience and functional outcomes were not consistently observed, nor was resilience consistently observed to be predictive of subjects’ capacity to return to a preinjury level of function.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>Patient resilience is inconsistently demonstrated to affect clinical outcomes associated with joint preserving and arthroscopic surgery. However, substantial limitations in the existing literature including underpowered sample sizes, lack of standardization in stratifying patients based on pretreatment resilience, and inconsistent collection of PROs throughout the continuum of care, diminish the strength of most conclusions that have been drawn.</p></div><div><h3>Level of Evidence</h3><p>Level IV, systematic review of level II-IV studies.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":34631,"journal":{"name":"Arthroscopy Sports Medicine and Rehabilitation","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-02-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666061X23001633/pdfft?md5=f4471676e664bad91596904c13e74b20&pid=1-s2.0-S2666061X23001633-main.pdf","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"139732585","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
An All-Suture–Based Technique for Meniscal Repair Is Cost-Effective in Comparison to Partial Meniscectomy for Horizontal Cleavage Tears 全缝合半月板修复技术与半月板部分切除术治疗水平裂缝撕裂相比具有成本效益
Q3 Medicine Pub Date : 2024-02-13 DOI: 10.1016/j.asmr.2023.100847
Seth L. Sherman M.D. , Neil Askew M.Sc. , Leo M. Nherera Ph.D. , Richard J. Searle Ph.D. , David C. Flanigan M.D.

Purpose

To determine the cost-effectiveness of meniscal repair (MR) using an all-suture–based technique when compared to partial meniscectomy (PM) for horizontal cleavage tears (HCTs) from a payor’s perspective in the United States.

Methods

A state-transition model and cost-utility analysis were developed from a US payor’s perspective to project treatment costs and quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs) in a cohort of 35-year-old patients without osteoarthritis at baseline and presenting with either a lateral or medial HCT. Two outpatient costing perspectives were used, namely ambulatory surgical centers (ASCs) and hospitals. The state-transition model had 7 health states with transition probabilities, costs, and utilities obtained from the existing literature. Cost-effectiveness was assessed using a willingness-to-pay threshold of $100,000/QALY, and sensitivity analysis considered the effects of parameter uncertainty on model results. MR failure rates were focused on an all-suture–based technique; however, in a separate scenario, this study considered effectiveness data from various MR techniques and devices.

Results

MR dominated PM over a lifetime horizon, increasing QALYs by 0.43 per patient and decreasing the cost by $12,227 per patient within a hospital setting (and by $12,570 within an ASC). MR with an all-suture–based technique continued to be the dominant treatment when age at primary treatment was varied between 30 and 60 years. Sensitivity analysis showed that MR was not cost-effective in year 1, was cost-effective from year 2, and was cost-saving from year 6 onward from both ASC and hospital perspectives. Probabilistic sensitivity analysis found that MR was cost-effective over a lifetime horizon in 99% of 10,000 iterations on base-case analysis.

Conclusions

Using a lifetime horizon, this study found that from a payor’s perspective, MR is a cost-saving intervention when compared with PM in patients with an HCT.

Level of Evidence

Level III, economic analysis.

目的从美国支付方的角度,确定采用全缝合技术进行半月板修复术(MR)与半月板部分切除术(PM)治疗水平裂缝撕裂(HCT)的成本效益。方法从美国支付方的角度建立了一个状态转换模型和成本效用分析,以预测基线无骨关节炎、出现外侧或内侧 HCT 的 35 岁患者的治疗成本和质量调整生命年(QALYs)。研究采用了两种门诊成本计算视角,即非住院手术中心(ASC)和医院。状态转换模型有 7 种健康状态,其转换概率、成本和效用均来自现有文献。成本效益采用 100,000 美元/QALY 的支付意愿阈值进行评估,敏感性分析考虑了参数不确定性对模型结果的影响。MR 的失败率主要集中在全缝合技术上;但在另一种情况下,本研究考虑了各种 MR 技术和设备的有效性数据。结果 MR 在整个生命周期内对 PM 起主导作用,每位患者的 QALY 增加了 0.43,在医院环境下每位患者的成本降低了 12,227 美元(在 ASC 环境下降低了 12,570 美元)。当初治年龄在 30 岁至 60 岁之间时,采用全缝合技术的 MR 仍是最主要的治疗方法。敏感性分析表明,从 ASC 和医院的角度来看,MR 在第 1 年不具有成本效益,从第 2 年起具有成本效益,从第 6 年起可节省成本。概率敏感性分析发现,在基础病例分析的 10,000 次迭代中,有 99% 的迭代结果显示 MR 在整个生命周期内都具有成本效益。结论本研究发现,从支付方的角度来看,与 PM 相比,MR 是一种可为 HCT 患者节省成本的干预措施。
{"title":"An All-Suture–Based Technique for Meniscal Repair Is Cost-Effective in Comparison to Partial Meniscectomy for Horizontal Cleavage Tears","authors":"Seth L. Sherman M.D. ,&nbsp;Neil Askew M.Sc. ,&nbsp;Leo M. Nherera Ph.D. ,&nbsp;Richard J. Searle Ph.D. ,&nbsp;David C. Flanigan M.D.","doi":"10.1016/j.asmr.2023.100847","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asmr.2023.100847","url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Purpose</h3><p>To determine the cost-effectiveness of meniscal repair (MR) using an all-suture–based technique when compared to partial meniscectomy (PM) for horizontal cleavage tears (HCTs) from a payor’s perspective in the United States.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>A state-transition model and cost-utility analysis were developed from a US payor’s perspective to project treatment costs and quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs) in a cohort of 35-year-old patients without osteoarthritis at baseline and presenting with either a lateral or medial HCT. Two outpatient costing perspectives were used, namely ambulatory surgical centers (ASCs) and hospitals. The state-transition model had 7 health states with transition probabilities, costs, and utilities obtained from the existing literature. Cost-effectiveness was assessed using a willingness-to-pay threshold of $100,000/QALY, and sensitivity analysis considered the effects of parameter uncertainty on model results. MR failure rates were focused on an all-suture–based technique; however, in a separate scenario, this study considered effectiveness data from various MR techniques and devices.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>MR dominated PM over a lifetime horizon, increasing QALYs by 0.43 per patient and decreasing the cost by $12,227 per patient within a hospital setting (and by $12,570 within an ASC). MR with an all-suture–based technique continued to be the dominant treatment when age at primary treatment was varied between 30 and 60 years. Sensitivity analysis showed that MR was not cost-effective in year 1, was cost-effective from year 2, and was cost-saving from year 6 onward from both ASC and hospital perspectives. Probabilistic sensitivity analysis found that MR was cost-effective over a lifetime horizon in 99% of 10,000 iterations on base-case analysis.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>Using a lifetime horizon, this study found that from a payor’s perspective, MR is a cost-saving intervention when compared with PM in patients with an HCT.</p></div><div><h3>Level of Evidence</h3><p>Level III, economic analysis.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":34631,"journal":{"name":"Arthroscopy Sports Medicine and Rehabilitation","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-02-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666061X23001980/pdfft?md5=70342cde14a2ae0deb821c8ae9672ff5&pid=1-s2.0-S2666061X23001980-main.pdf","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"139732517","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
ChatGPT Can Offer Satisfactory Responses to Common Patient Questions Regarding Elbow Ulnar Collateral Ligament Reconstruction ChatGPT 可以满意地回答患者关于肘关节尺侧副韧带重建的常见问题
Q3 Medicine Pub Date : 2024-02-13 DOI: 10.1016/j.asmr.2024.100893
William L. Johns M.D. , Alec Kellish M.D. , Dominic Farronato B.S. , Michael G. Ciccotti M.D. , Sommer Hammoud M.D.

Purpose

To determine whether ChatGPT effectively responds to 10 commonly asked questions concerning ulnar collateral ligament (UCL) reconstruction.

Methods

A comprehensive list of 90 UCL reconstruction questions was initially created, with a final set of 10 “most commonly asked” questions ultimately selected. Questions were presented to ChatGPT and its response was documented. Responses were evaluated independently by 3 authors using an evidence-based methodology, resulting in a grading system categorized as follows: (1) excellent response not requiring clarification; (2) satisfactory requiring minimal clarification; (3) satisfactory requiring moderate clarification; and (4) unsatisfactory requiring substantial clarification.

Results

Six of 10 ten responses were rated as “excellent” or “satisfactory.” Of those 6 responses, 2 were determined to be “excellent response not requiring clarification,” 3 were “satisfactory requiring minimal clarification,” and 1 was “satisfactory requiring moderate clarification.” Four questions encompassing inquiries about “What are the potential risks of UCL reconstruction surgery?” “Which type of graft should be used for my UCL reconstruction?” and “Should I have UCL reconstruction or repair?” were rated as “unsatisfactory requiring substantial clarification.”

Conclusions

ChatGPT exhibited the potential to improve a patient’s basic understanding of UCL reconstruction and provided responses that were deemed satisfactory to excellent for 60% of the most commonly asked questions. For the other 40% of questions, ChatGPT gave unsatisfactory responses, primarily due to a lack of relevant details or the need for further explanation.

Clinical Relevance

ChatGPT can assist in patient education regarding UCL reconstruction; however, its ability to appropriately answer more complex questions remains to be an area of skepticism and future improvement.

目的确定 ChatGPT 是否能有效回答有关尺侧副韧带(UCL)重建的 10 个常见问题。方法最初创建了一个包含 90 个 UCL 重建问题的综合列表,最终选出了 10 个 "最常见 "问题。将问题提交给 ChatGPT 并记录其回复。由 3 位作者采用循证方法对回复进行独立评估,最终形成一个分级系统,分类如下:(结果 10 个答复中有 6 个被评为 "优秀 "或 "满意"。在这 6 个答复中,有 2 个被确定为 "不需要澄清的优秀答复",3 个被确定为 "满意,只需要少量澄清",1 个被确定为 "满意,需要适度澄清"。四个问题包括 "UCL 重建手术的潜在风险是什么?"结论 ChatGPT 有可能提高患者对 UCL 重建的基本认识,并对 60% 的常见问题提供了满意至优秀的答复。对于其他 40% 的问题,ChatGPT 提供了不满意的回答,主要原因是缺乏相关细节或需要进一步解释。临床相关性ChatGPT 可以帮助患者了解有关 UCL 重建的知识;但是,它能否恰当地回答更复杂的问题仍然是一个值得怀疑和有待改进的领域。
{"title":"ChatGPT Can Offer Satisfactory Responses to Common Patient Questions Regarding Elbow Ulnar Collateral Ligament Reconstruction","authors":"William L. Johns M.D. ,&nbsp;Alec Kellish M.D. ,&nbsp;Dominic Farronato B.S. ,&nbsp;Michael G. Ciccotti M.D. ,&nbsp;Sommer Hammoud M.D.","doi":"10.1016/j.asmr.2024.100893","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asmr.2024.100893","url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Purpose</h3><p>To determine whether ChatGPT effectively responds to 10 commonly asked questions concerning ulnar collateral ligament (UCL) reconstruction.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>A comprehensive list of 90 UCL reconstruction questions was initially created, with a final set of 10 “most commonly asked” questions ultimately selected. Questions were presented to ChatGPT and its response was documented. Responses were evaluated independently by 3 authors using an evidence-based methodology, resulting in a grading system categorized as follows: (1) excellent response not requiring clarification; (2) satisfactory requiring minimal clarification; (3) satisfactory requiring moderate clarification; and (4) unsatisfactory requiring substantial clarification.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Six of 10 ten responses were rated as “excellent” or “satisfactory.” Of those 6 responses, 2 were determined to be “excellent response not requiring clarification,” 3 were “satisfactory requiring minimal clarification,” and 1 was “satisfactory requiring moderate clarification.” Four questions encompassing inquiries about “What are the potential risks of UCL reconstruction surgery?” “Which type of graft should be used for my UCL reconstruction?” and “Should I have UCL reconstruction or repair?” were rated as “unsatisfactory requiring substantial clarification.”</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>ChatGPT exhibited the potential to improve a patient’s basic understanding of UCL reconstruction and provided responses that were deemed satisfactory to excellent for 60% of the most commonly asked questions. For the other 40% of questions, ChatGPT gave unsatisfactory responses, primarily due to a lack of relevant details or the need for further explanation.</p></div><div><h3>Clinical Relevance</h3><p>ChatGPT can assist in patient education regarding UCL reconstruction; however, its ability to appropriately answer more complex questions remains to be an area of skepticism and future improvement.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":34631,"journal":{"name":"Arthroscopy Sports Medicine and Rehabilitation","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-02-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666061X24000117/pdfft?md5=2050f137b07df1e314a24ed314d80097&pid=1-s2.0-S2666061X24000117-main.pdf","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"139725918","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Smokers Achieved Minimal Clinically Important Difference for Visual Analog Scale and American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons Scores at a Lower Rate Than Nonsmokers Even When Repaired Supraspinatus Tendons Were Intact on Postoperative Magnetic Resonance Imaging 即使术后磁共振成像显示修复的冈上肌腱完好无损,吸烟者获得视觉模拟量表和美国肩肘外科医生评分的最小临床重要差异率也低于不吸烟者
Q3 Medicine Pub Date : 2024-02-13 DOI: 10.1016/j.asmr.2023.100877
W P Yau M.B.B.S., F.R.C.S.Ed., F.R.C.S.Ed. (Ortho.), F.H.K.C.O.S., F.H.K.A.M. (Orthopaedic Surgery)

Purpose

To investigate the impact of smoking on clinical outcomes after repair of supraspinatus tendon in patients who had an intact repair found on postoperative magnetic resonance imaging.

Methods

Patients who received primary complete repair of supraspinatus tendon tear between 2014 and 2020 were retrospectively identified. Patients were excluded if a postoperative magnetic resonance imaging scan was not available or if the follow-up was less than 2 years. Visual analog score (VAS), American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons (ASES) score, and active forward flexion were assessed at the 2-year follow-up. The percentage of patients acquiring minimal clinically important difference (MCID) was reported.

Results

One hundred primary supraspinatus tendon repairs were included. The healing rate was 77% in smokers and 90% in nonsmokers. Smoking was the independent predictor of a poorer 2-year VAS (P < .001) and ASES (P < .001) scores. Significant improvement in clinical outcomes was observed between preoperation and the 2-year follow-up, regardless of the integrity of the repair or smoking status (P < .001). When the repaired tendon was intact, nonsmokers had a greater chance of achieving MCID in 2-year VAS and ASES scores than smokers. Ninety-nine percent of nonsmokers, compared with 82% of smokers, achieved MCID in VAS at the 2-year follow-up (P = .023). The corresponding figures for ASES were 98% and 71%, respectively (P = .004).

Conclusions

In this study, smoking was associated with poorer clinical outcomes, including a greater 2-year VAS pain score and a lower 2-year ASES score, when compared with nonsmokers, even in cases in which there was no full-thickness retear of the repaired supraspinatus tendon.

Level of Evidence

Level III, retrospective cohort study.

目的 研究在术后磁共振成像中发现修复完整的冈上肌腱患者中,吸烟对修复后临床结果的影响。如果没有术后磁共振成像扫描或随访时间少于 2 年,则排除患者。在2年随访期间对视觉模拟评分(VAS)、美国肩肘外科医生(ASES)评分和主动前屈进行了评估。报告了获得最小临床重要差异(MCID)的患者比例。吸烟者的愈合率为 77%,非吸烟者为 90%。吸烟是导致 2 年 VAS(P < .001)和 ASES(P < .001)评分较差的独立预测因素。无论修复肌腱是否完整或是否吸烟,手术前和两年随访期间的临床结果都有显著改善(P < .001)。如果修复的肌腱完好无损,与吸烟者相比,非吸烟者在两年的 VAS 和 ASES 评分中达到 MCID 的几率更大。与 82% 的吸烟者相比,99% 的非吸烟者在 2 年的随访中 VAS 达到 MCID(P = .023)。结论在这项研究中,与不吸烟者相比,吸烟与较差的临床结果有关,包括较高的2年VAS疼痛评分和较低的2年ASES评分,即使在修复的冈上肌腱没有发生全厚度再撕裂的情况下也是如此。
{"title":"Smokers Achieved Minimal Clinically Important Difference for Visual Analog Scale and American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons Scores at a Lower Rate Than Nonsmokers Even When Repaired Supraspinatus Tendons Were Intact on Postoperative Magnetic Resonance Imaging","authors":"W P Yau M.B.B.S., F.R.C.S.Ed., F.R.C.S.Ed. (Ortho.), F.H.K.C.O.S., F.H.K.A.M. (Orthopaedic Surgery)","doi":"10.1016/j.asmr.2023.100877","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asmr.2023.100877","url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Purpose</h3><p>To investigate the impact of smoking on clinical outcomes after repair of supraspinatus tendon in patients who had an intact repair found on postoperative magnetic resonance imaging.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>Patients who received primary complete repair of supraspinatus tendon tear between 2014 and 2020 were retrospectively identified. Patients were excluded if a postoperative magnetic resonance imaging scan was not available or if the follow-up was less than 2 years. Visual analog score (VAS), American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons (ASES) score, and active forward flexion were assessed at the 2-year follow-up. The percentage of patients acquiring minimal clinically important difference (MCID) was reported.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>One hundred primary supraspinatus tendon repairs were included. The healing rate was 77% in smokers and 90% in nonsmokers. Smoking was the independent predictor of a poorer 2-year VAS (<em>P</em> &lt; .001) and ASES (<em>P</em> &lt; .001) scores. Significant improvement in clinical outcomes was observed between preoperation and the 2-year follow-up, regardless of the integrity of the repair or smoking status (<em>P</em> &lt; .001). When the repaired tendon was intact, nonsmokers had a greater chance of achieving MCID in 2-year VAS and ASES scores than smokers. Ninety-nine percent of nonsmokers, compared with 82% of smokers, achieved MCID in VAS at the 2-year follow-up (<em>P</em> = .023). The corresponding figures for ASES were 98% and 71%, respectively (<em>P</em> = .004).</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>In this study, smoking was associated with poorer clinical outcomes, including a greater 2-year VAS pain score and a lower 2-year ASES score, when compared with nonsmokers, even in cases in which there was no full-thickness retear of the repaired supraspinatus tendon.</p></div><div><h3>Level of Evidence</h3><p>Level III, retrospective cohort study.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":34631,"journal":{"name":"Arthroscopy Sports Medicine and Rehabilitation","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-02-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666061X23002286/pdfft?md5=2533962af1c98fae08d08669522a3c2d&pid=1-s2.0-S2666061X23002286-main.pdf","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"139731597","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Tibial Tubercle Trochlear Groove Distance Does Not Correlate With Patellar Tendon Length in Patients Who Underwent Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction 胫骨结节齿槽距离与接受前交叉韧带重建术患者的髌腱长度无关
Q3 Medicine Pub Date : 2024-02-13 DOI: 10.1016/j.asmr.2023.100870
Emma E. Johnson M.D., William L. Johns M.D., Bryson Kemler M.D., Rahul Muchintala B.S., Ryan W. Paul B.S., Manoj Reddy M.D., Brandon J. Erickson M.D.

Purpose

To examine the relationship between tibial tubercle–trochlear groove (TT-TG) distance and patellar tendon length.

Methods

All healthy athletes who underwent anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction who had a magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) study of the knee on file between July 2018 and June 2019 at a single institution were retrospectively reviewed. Exclusion criteria included patients without an MRI study of the knee on file or with an MRI of insufficient quality precluding reliable calculation of TT-TG and patellar tendon length. MRIs were reviewed to calculate TT-TG, patellar tendon length, and Caton–Deschamps Index (CDI). Patient charts were reviewed to obtain anthropometric characteristics including sex, concomitant injuries, and previous knee procedures as well as age at time of MRI. Spearman correlations were used to assess the relationship between TT-TG, patellar tendon length, and CDI, with regression analysis performed to assess for relationships between TT-TG, patellar tendon length, and patient-specific factors.

Results

Overall, 235 patients (99 female [42.1%], 136 male [57.9%]; mean age: 30.0 years [23.0; 40.0]) were included. Inter-rater reliability between the 2 reviewers was 0.888 for TT-TG, 0.804 for patellar tendon length, and 0.748 for CDI, indicating strong agreement. The correlation between TT-TG and patellar tendon length was 0.021, indicating no true relationship. The correlation between TT-TG and CDI was –0.048 and that of patellar tendon length and CDI was 0.411, indicating a weak positive relationship. Regression analysis found that male sex is strongly correlated with a longer patellar tendon length (odds ratio 2.65, 95% confidence interval 1.33-3.97, P < .001).

Conclusions

In this study, no correlation was found between TT-TG and patellar tendon length or CDI. Male sex was correlated with a longer patellar length.

Level of Evidence

Level III.

目的研究胫骨结节-韧带沟(TT-TG)距离与髌腱长度之间的关系。方法回顾性审查了2018年7月至2019年6月期间在一家机构接受前交叉韧带重建术并有膝关节磁共振成像(MRI)研究存档的所有健康运动员。排除标准包括没有存档膝关节核磁共振成像研究或核磁共振成像质量不高,无法可靠计算TT-TG和髌腱长度的患者。核磁共振成像检查用于计算TT-TG、髌腱长度和卡顿-德尚指数(CDI)。查看患者病历以获得人体测量特征,包括性别、并发症、既往膝关节手术以及 MRI 检查时的年龄。斯皮尔曼相关性用于评估TT-TG、髌腱长度和CDI之间的关系,回归分析用于评估TT-TG、髌腱长度和患者特异性因素之间的关系。结果共纳入235名患者(99名女性[42.1%],136名男性[57.9%];平均年龄:30.0岁[23.0;40.0])。TT-TG 和髌腱长度的两位评审员之间的评分间可靠性分别为 0.888 和 0.804,CDI 为 0.748,显示出很高的一致性。TT-TG 与髌腱长度的相关性为 0.021,表明两者之间没有真正的关系。TT-TG与CDI的相关性为-0.048,髌腱长度与CDI的相关性为0.411,表明两者之间存在微弱的正相关关系。回归分析发现,男性性别与较长的髌腱长度密切相关(几率比 2.65,95% 置信区间 1.33-3.97,P <.001)。男性性别与较长的髌骨长度相关。
{"title":"Tibial Tubercle Trochlear Groove Distance Does Not Correlate With Patellar Tendon Length in Patients Who Underwent Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction","authors":"Emma E. Johnson M.D.,&nbsp;William L. Johns M.D.,&nbsp;Bryson Kemler M.D.,&nbsp;Rahul Muchintala B.S.,&nbsp;Ryan W. Paul B.S.,&nbsp;Manoj Reddy M.D.,&nbsp;Brandon J. Erickson M.D.","doi":"10.1016/j.asmr.2023.100870","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asmr.2023.100870","url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Purpose</h3><p>To examine the relationship between tibial tubercle–trochlear groove (TT-TG) distance and patellar tendon length.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>All healthy athletes who underwent anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction who had a magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) study of the knee on file between July 2018 and June 2019 at a single institution were retrospectively reviewed. Exclusion criteria included patients without an MRI study of the knee on file or with an MRI of insufficient quality precluding reliable calculation of TT-TG and patellar tendon length. MRIs were reviewed to calculate TT-TG, patellar tendon length, and Caton–Deschamps Index (CDI). Patient charts were reviewed to obtain anthropometric characteristics including sex, concomitant injuries, and previous knee procedures as well as age at time of MRI. Spearman correlations were used to assess the relationship between TT-TG, patellar tendon length, and CDI, with regression analysis performed to assess for relationships between TT-TG, patellar tendon length, and patient-specific factors.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Overall, 235 patients (99 female [42.1%], 136 male [57.9%]; mean age: 30.0 years [23.0; 40.0]) were included. Inter-rater reliability between the 2 reviewers was 0.888 for TT-TG, 0.804 for patellar tendon length, and 0.748 for CDI, indicating strong agreement. The correlation between TT-TG and patellar tendon length was 0.021, indicating no true relationship. The correlation between TT-TG and CDI was –0.048 and that of patellar tendon length and CDI was 0.411, indicating a weak positive relationship. Regression analysis found that male sex is strongly correlated with a longer patellar tendon length (odds ratio 2.65, 95% confidence interval 1.33-3.97, <em>P</em> &lt; .001).</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>In this study, no correlation was found between TT-TG and patellar tendon length or CDI. Male sex was correlated with a longer patellar length.</p></div><div><h3>Level of Evidence</h3><p>Level III.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":34631,"journal":{"name":"Arthroscopy Sports Medicine and Rehabilitation","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-02-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666061X23002213/pdfft?md5=9428cdbf0a9b9f5563389a0972b2c011&pid=1-s2.0-S2666061X23002213-main.pdf","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"139731595","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Bioabsorbable Screw Fixation Provides Good Results With Low Failure Rates at Mid-term Follow-up of Stable Osteochondritis Dissecans Lesions That Do Not Improve With Initial Conservative Treatment 生物可吸收螺钉固定术对初期保守治疗未见好转的稳定型骨软骨炎脱位病变的中期随访结果良好,失败率低
Q3 Medicine Pub Date : 2024-02-12 DOI: 10.1016/j.asmr.2023.100863
Ryan Quigley M.D., Sachin Allahabadi M.D., Allen A. Yazdi B.S., Landon P. Frazier B.S., Katie J. McMorrow B.S., Zachary D. Meeker B.S., Kyle R. Wagner M.D., Jimmy Chan M.D., Brian J. Cole M.D., M.B.A.

Purpose

To evaluate the clinical and radiographic outcomes of patients who have undergone bioabsorbable screw fixation for intact, stable grade I and II osteochondritis dissecans (OCD) lesions for which at least 6 months of conservative management has failed.

Methods

A retrospective review of prospectively collected data from a single institution was performed to identify patients who underwent internal fixation of stable grade I and II OCD lesions (according to the Guhl classification) between January 2010 and January 2020. Patients were included regardless of the presence of concomitant procedures. The inclusion criteria consisted of (1) primary surgery, (2) failure of at least 6 months of conservative management, (3) the use of a bioabsorbable screw (or screws), and (4) minimum 2-year clinical follow-up. Radiographs were obtained at a minimum of 1 year postoperatively. Patient demographic characteristics, clinical patient-reported outcomes, complications, and failure rates were noted.

Results

Twenty-four knees among 23 patients (96% follow-up) were analyzed and followed up for 6.36 ± 3.42 years (range, 2.0-12.7 years). Patients showed statistically significant postoperative improvements in all patient-reported outcomes including the Lysholm score, International Knee Documentation Committee score, and Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score subscales (P < .05). In 3 knees (12%), a reoperation was required due to failure at an average of 3.64 years after the index procedure. No specific complications were attributed to the use of bioabsorbable screws. Patients in whom primary surgical treatment failed did not differ in demographic characteristics, arthroscopic findings, or surgical treatment from those who had successful treatment.

Conclusions

Internal fixation of stable grade I and II OCD lesions with bioabsorbable screws produces reliable results with a 12% rate of failure in appropriately indicated patients in whom at least 6 months of conservative management has failed. Clinical outcomes improved significantly during the mid-term follow-up period.

Level of Evidence

Level IV, therapeutic case series.

目的 评价对保守治疗至少 6 个月无效的完整、稳定的 I 级和 II 级骨软骨炎(OCD)病变进行生物可吸收螺钉固定的患者的临床和影像学疗效。方法 对一家医疗机构前瞻性收集的数据进行回顾性审查,以确定 2010 年 1 月至 2020 年 1 月间对稳定的 I 级和 II 级 OCD 病变(根据 Guhl 分类)进行内固定的患者。无论是否同时接受手术,患者均被纳入研究范围。纳入标准包括:(1)初次手术;(2)至少 6 个月的保守治疗失败;(3)使用生物可吸收螺钉;(4)至少 2 年的临床随访。术后至少 1 年进行射线照相。结果对 23 名患者(96%随访)的 24 个膝关节进行了分析,随访时间为 6.36 ± 3.42 年(2.0-12.7 年)。患者术后在所有患者报告的结果(包括 Lysholm 评分、国际膝关节文献委员会评分以及膝关节损伤和骨关节炎结果评分子量表)方面均有统计学意义的改善(P <.05)。有 3 个膝关节(12%)在指数手术后平均 3.64 年因手术失败而需要再次手术。使用生物可吸收螺钉后没有出现特殊并发症。结论使用生物可吸收螺钉对稳定的I级和II级OCD病变进行内固定治疗效果可靠,但对于经过至少6个月的保守治疗无效的患者来说,失败率仅为12%。在中期随访期间,临床效果明显改善。
{"title":"Bioabsorbable Screw Fixation Provides Good Results With Low Failure Rates at Mid-term Follow-up of Stable Osteochondritis Dissecans Lesions That Do Not Improve With Initial Conservative Treatment","authors":"Ryan Quigley M.D.,&nbsp;Sachin Allahabadi M.D.,&nbsp;Allen A. Yazdi B.S.,&nbsp;Landon P. Frazier B.S.,&nbsp;Katie J. McMorrow B.S.,&nbsp;Zachary D. Meeker B.S.,&nbsp;Kyle R. Wagner M.D.,&nbsp;Jimmy Chan M.D.,&nbsp;Brian J. Cole M.D., M.B.A.","doi":"10.1016/j.asmr.2023.100863","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asmr.2023.100863","url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Purpose</h3><p>To evaluate the clinical and radiographic outcomes of patients who have undergone bioabsorbable screw fixation for intact, stable grade I and II osteochondritis dissecans (OCD) lesions for which at least 6 months of conservative management has failed.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>A retrospective review of prospectively collected data from a single institution was performed to identify patients who underwent internal fixation of stable grade I and II OCD lesions (according to the Guhl classification) between January 2010 and January 2020. Patients were included regardless of the presence of concomitant procedures. The inclusion criteria consisted of (1) primary surgery, (2) failure of at least 6 months of conservative management, (3) the use of a bioabsorbable screw (or screws), and (4) minimum 2-year clinical follow-up. Radiographs were obtained at a minimum of 1 year postoperatively. Patient demographic characteristics, clinical patient-reported outcomes, complications, and failure rates were noted.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Twenty-four knees among 23 patients (96% follow-up) were analyzed and followed up for 6.36 ± 3.42 years (range, 2.0-12.7 years). Patients showed statistically significant postoperative improvements in all patient-reported outcomes including the Lysholm score, International Knee Documentation Committee score, and Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score subscales (<em>P</em> &lt; .05). In 3 knees (12%), a reoperation was required due to failure at an average of 3.64 years after the index procedure. No specific complications were attributed to the use of bioabsorbable screws. Patients in whom primary surgical treatment failed did not differ in demographic characteristics, arthroscopic findings, or surgical treatment from those who had successful treatment.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>Internal fixation of stable grade I and II OCD lesions with bioabsorbable screws produces reliable results with a 12% rate of failure in appropriately indicated patients in whom at least 6 months of conservative management has failed. Clinical outcomes improved significantly during the mid-term follow-up period.</p></div><div><h3>Level of Evidence</h3><p>Level IV, therapeutic case series.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":34631,"journal":{"name":"Arthroscopy Sports Medicine and Rehabilitation","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-02-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666061X23002146/pdfft?md5=c97fb04b460a898e9f17a14573429923&pid=1-s2.0-S2666061X23002146-main.pdf","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"139719514","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Improvements in Sleep After Shoulder Arthroscopy Are Correlated With Improvements in Various Patient-Reported Outcomes: A Systematic Review 肩关节镜手术后睡眠的改善与各种患者报告结果的改善相关:系统回顾
Q3 Medicine Pub Date : 2024-02-12 DOI: 10.1016/j.asmr.2024.100883
David Teytelbaum M.D. , Luke Wegenka B.S., , Riley Wolk B.S. , Ashley Ali M.D. , Courtney R.J. Kaar M.D. , Scott Karr M.D., M.B.A.

Purpose

To determine the prevalence of sleep disturbances in patients before and after arthroscopic surgery of the shoulder and to evaluate the association between patient-reported outcomes and standardized sleep disturbance tools after shoulder arthroscopy.

Methods

A systematic review, following PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses) guidelines, was conducted by searching the PubMed, Embase, and Scopus databases using the terms “arthroscopic surgery” and “sleep.” Two independent reviewers evaluated the studies based on the inclusion criteria focused on the effects of shoulder arthroscopy on sleep disturbance and the use of outcome measures related to sleep. Data on sleep quality and functional outcomes were collected and analyzed using various assessment tools, including the Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index and American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons score. The methodologic quality of included studies was assessed using the Methodological Index for Non-randomized Studies (MINORS) criteria.

Results

The review included 15 studies (9 Level IV, 5 Level III, and 1 Level II) comprising 1,818 arthroscopic patients (average age, 57.4 ± 8.86 years; follow-up range, 6 months to 75.7 months). The prevalence rates of sleep disturbances before and after shoulder arthroscopy ranged from 75.8% to 100% and from 19% to 62%, respectively. Every study included in this analysis reported an improvement in rates of sleep disturbances postoperatively compared with preoperatively. Improvements in standardized sleep disturbance scores were associated with functional outcomes.

Conclusions

Sleep disturbances are commonly observed before and after arthroscopic surgery of the shoulder. Arthroscopic surgery of the shoulder appears to improve sleep quality, and surgeons can expect functional outcomes, specifically the American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons score, Simple Shoulder Test score, numeric rating scale or visual analog scale score, and Constant-Murley score, to improve in line with sleep quality.

Level of Evidence

Level IV, systematic review of Level II to IV studies.

目的确定肩关节镜手术前后患者睡眠障碍的发生率,并评估肩关节镜手术后患者报告的结果与标准化睡眠障碍工具之间的关联。方法按照PRISMA(系统综述和Meta分析首选报告项目)指南,使用 "关节镜手术 "和 "睡眠 "两个术语在PubMed、Embase和Scopus数据库中进行搜索,从而开展了一项系统综述。两位独立审稿人根据纳入标准对研究进行了评估,重点关注肩关节镜手术对睡眠障碍的影响以及与睡眠相关的结果指标的使用情况。使用各种评估工具(包括匹兹堡睡眠质量指数和美国肩肘外科医生评分)收集和分析了有关睡眠质量和功能结果的数据。采用非随机研究方法学指数(MINORS)标准对纳入研究的方法学质量进行了评估。结果该综述纳入了15项研究(9项IV级、5项III级和1项II级),包括1818名关节镜患者(平均年龄为57.4±8.86岁;随访时间范围为6个月至75.7个月)。肩关节镜手术前后的睡眠障碍发生率分别为75.8%至100%和19%至62%。这项分析所包含的每项研究都报告称,与术前相比,术后睡眠障碍的发生率有所改善。结论肩关节镜手术前后经常会出现睡眠障碍。肩关节镜手术似乎可以改善睡眠质量,外科医生可以预期功能结果,特别是美国肩肘外科医生评分、简单肩关节测试评分、数字评分量表或视觉模拟评分量表评分以及Constant-Murley评分会随着睡眠质量的改善而改善。
{"title":"Improvements in Sleep After Shoulder Arthroscopy Are Correlated With Improvements in Various Patient-Reported Outcomes: A Systematic Review","authors":"David Teytelbaum M.D. ,&nbsp;Luke Wegenka B.S., ,&nbsp;Riley Wolk B.S. ,&nbsp;Ashley Ali M.D. ,&nbsp;Courtney R.J. Kaar M.D. ,&nbsp;Scott Karr M.D., M.B.A.","doi":"10.1016/j.asmr.2024.100883","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asmr.2024.100883","url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Purpose</h3><p>To determine the prevalence of sleep disturbances in patients before and after arthroscopic surgery of the shoulder and to evaluate the association between patient-reported outcomes and standardized sleep disturbance tools after shoulder arthroscopy.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>A systematic review, following PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses) guidelines, was conducted by searching the PubMed, Embase, and Scopus databases using the terms “arthroscopic surgery” and “sleep.” Two independent reviewers evaluated the studies based on the inclusion criteria focused on the effects of shoulder arthroscopy on sleep disturbance and the use of outcome measures related to sleep. Data on sleep quality and functional outcomes were collected and analyzed using various assessment tools, including the Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index and American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons score. The methodologic quality of included studies was assessed using the Methodological Index for Non-randomized Studies (MINORS) criteria.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>The review included 15 studies (9 Level IV, 5 Level III, and 1 Level II) comprising 1,818 arthroscopic patients (average age, 57.4 ± 8.86 years; follow-up range, 6 months to 75.7 months). The prevalence rates of sleep disturbances before and after shoulder arthroscopy ranged from 75.8% to 100% and from 19% to 62%, respectively. Every study included in this analysis reported an improvement in rates of sleep disturbances postoperatively compared with preoperatively. Improvements in standardized sleep disturbance scores were associated with functional outcomes.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>Sleep disturbances are commonly observed before and after arthroscopic surgery of the shoulder. Arthroscopic surgery of the shoulder appears to improve sleep quality, and surgeons can expect functional outcomes, specifically the American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons score, Simple Shoulder Test score, numeric rating scale or visual analog scale score, and Constant-Murley score, to improve in line with sleep quality.</p></div><div><h3>Level of Evidence</h3><p>Level IV, systematic review of Level II to IV studies.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":34631,"journal":{"name":"Arthroscopy Sports Medicine and Rehabilitation","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-02-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666061X24000014/pdfft?md5=f01700840e4192ad5600bcbad8ffbf13&pid=1-s2.0-S2666061X24000014-main.pdf","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"139719515","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
期刊
Arthroscopy Sports Medicine and Rehabilitation
全部 Acc. Chem. Res. ACS Applied Bio Materials ACS Appl. Electron. Mater. ACS Appl. Energy Mater. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces ACS Appl. Nano Mater. ACS Appl. Polym. Mater. ACS BIOMATER-SCI ENG ACS Catal. ACS Cent. Sci. ACS Chem. Biol. ACS Chemical Health & Safety ACS Chem. Neurosci. ACS Comb. Sci. ACS Earth Space Chem. ACS Energy Lett. ACS Infect. Dis. ACS Macro Lett. ACS Mater. Lett. ACS Med. Chem. Lett. ACS Nano ACS Omega ACS Photonics ACS Sens. ACS Sustainable Chem. Eng. ACS Synth. Biol. Anal. Chem. BIOCHEMISTRY-US Bioconjugate Chem. BIOMACROMOLECULES Chem. Res. Toxicol. Chem. Rev. Chem. Mater. CRYST GROWTH DES ENERG FUEL Environ. Sci. Technol. Environ. Sci. Technol. Lett. Eur. J. Inorg. Chem. IND ENG CHEM RES Inorg. Chem. J. Agric. Food. Chem. J. Chem. Eng. Data J. Chem. Educ. J. Chem. Inf. Model. J. Chem. Theory Comput. J. Med. Chem. J. Nat. Prod. J PROTEOME RES J. Am. Chem. Soc. LANGMUIR MACROMOLECULES Mol. Pharmaceutics Nano Lett. Org. Lett. ORG PROCESS RES DEV ORGANOMETALLICS J. Org. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. A J. Phys. Chem. B J. Phys. Chem. C J. Phys. Chem. Lett. Analyst Anal. Methods Biomater. Sci. Catal. Sci. Technol. Chem. Commun. Chem. Soc. Rev. CHEM EDUC RES PRACT CRYSTENGCOMM Dalton Trans. Energy Environ. Sci. ENVIRON SCI-NANO ENVIRON SCI-PROC IMP ENVIRON SCI-WAT RES Faraday Discuss. Food Funct. Green Chem. Inorg. Chem. Front. Integr. Biol. J. Anal. At. Spectrom. J. Mater. Chem. A J. Mater. Chem. B J. Mater. Chem. C Lab Chip Mater. Chem. Front. Mater. Horiz. MEDCHEMCOMM Metallomics Mol. Biosyst. Mol. Syst. Des. Eng. Nanoscale Nanoscale Horiz. Nat. Prod. Rep. New J. Chem. Org. Biomol. Chem. Org. Chem. Front. PHOTOCH PHOTOBIO SCI PCCP Polym. Chem.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1