Pub Date : 2019-06-28DOI: 10.24090/VOLKSGEIST.V2I1.2446
H. Al-Azhar
Indonesia as a legal state is the logical consequence of the crystallization of Indonesian history as a nation both historically and constitutionally. Hence, Indonesia should has accountable constitutional system in law enforcement as well as social prestige to increase public trust in the justice system in Indonesia. In this study, the researcher is more focus on the justice system as the law enforcement. This study aims to investigate the inclusion of imbalance authority in Indonesia judicial system; between the Constitutional Court authority and the Supreme Court in testing legislation. Thus, intended conceptual reconstruction is a form of actualization as well as recommendation on the justice system that must be integrated in the two judicial institutions authority. Therefore, this research is conducted methodically as literal-descriptive research by addressing relevant data literally.
{"title":"Rekonstruksi Konseptual Peradilan sebagai Revitalisasi Kekuasaan Kehakiman dalam Sistem Ketatanegaraan Indonesia","authors":"H. Al-Azhar","doi":"10.24090/VOLKSGEIST.V2I1.2446","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.24090/VOLKSGEIST.V2I1.2446","url":null,"abstract":"Indonesia as a legal state is the logical consequence of the crystallization of Indonesian history as a nation both historically and constitutionally. Hence, Indonesia should has accountable constitutional system in law enforcement as well as social prestige to increase public trust in the justice system in Indonesia. In this study, the researcher is more focus on the justice system as the law enforcement. This study aims to investigate the inclusion of imbalance authority in Indonesia judicial system; between the Constitutional Court authority and the Supreme Court in testing legislation. Thus, intended conceptual reconstruction is a form of actualization as well as recommendation on the justice system that must be integrated in the two judicial institutions authority. Therefore, this research is conducted methodically as literal-descriptive research by addressing relevant data literally.","PeriodicalId":34760,"journal":{"name":"Volksgeist","volume":"35 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2019-06-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"75239320","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2019-06-27DOI: 10.24090/VOLKSGEIST.V2I1.1961
Sarpini Sarpini
In the Qur'an and al-Hadith there are no provisions that explicitly regulate insurance. Therefore, this insurance includes the issue of ijtihadiyah, it means that to determine the law of insurance whether halal or haram, it requires the role of fiqh scholars through ijtihad. This study uses descriptive analysis in which the authors describe all data about life insurance in a systematic, careful and factual with deductive pattern to propose theories or general propositions about maslahah then analyzing data on the basis and substance of Indonesian Ulema Council (MUI) fatwa on life insurance to obtain specific conclusion. This study concludes that the background of the emergence of the MUI fatwa on life insurance is due to public question about life insurance, whether the legal status or its activity are in accordance with the Shari'ah. The legal basis used by MUI in establishing fatwa on life insurance is the Qur'an, al-hadith and fiqh muamalah. MUI fatwa used istinbat method to regulate the life insurance viewed from the concept of maslahah is called maslahah the mu'tabarah (acceptable).
{"title":"Tinjauan Maṣlaḥah terhadap Metode Istinbāṭ Fatwa Majelis Ulama Indonesia tentang Asuransi Jiwa","authors":"Sarpini Sarpini","doi":"10.24090/VOLKSGEIST.V2I1.1961","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.24090/VOLKSGEIST.V2I1.1961","url":null,"abstract":"In the Qur'an and al-Hadith there are no provisions that explicitly regulate insurance. Therefore, this insurance includes the issue of ijtihadiyah, it means that to determine the law of insurance whether halal or haram, it requires the role of fiqh scholars through ijtihad. This study uses descriptive analysis in which the authors describe all data about life insurance in a systematic, careful and factual with deductive pattern to propose theories or general propositions about maslahah then analyzing data on the basis and substance of Indonesian Ulema Council (MUI) fatwa on life insurance to obtain specific conclusion. This study concludes that the background of the emergence of the MUI fatwa on life insurance is due to public question about life insurance, whether the legal status or its activity are in accordance with the Shari'ah. The legal basis used by MUI in establishing fatwa on life insurance is the Qur'an, al-hadith and fiqh muamalah. MUI fatwa used istinbat method to regulate the life insurance viewed from the concept of maslahah is called maslahah the mu'tabarah (acceptable).","PeriodicalId":34760,"journal":{"name":"Volksgeist","volume":"2002 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2019-06-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"88388599","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2019-06-26DOI: 10.24090/VOLKSGEIST.V2I1.2387
Velliana Tanaya, Harimurti Adi Nugroho
Since the enactment of Law No. 24/2009 on Flag, Language, National Emblems and the National Anthem (UU Bahasa), many court decisions arise related to the use of foreign languages (English) in agreements made between Indonesian Citizens or Indonesia Legal Entities with Foreigners or Foreign Legal Entities. One of the most well-known verdicts was the verdict that canceled the loan agreement between PT Bangun Karya Pertama Lestasri and Nine AM for violating Article 31 paragraph (1) UU Bahasa. This article discusses 4 cases that have been resolved by the State Court, the High Court and the Supreme Court where almost all of the decisions cancelled the agreements written in foreign languages. It is effected the businessman to use governing language clauses and translation clauses into foreign language agreements based on freedom of contract and pacta sunt servanda
自从第24/2009号关于国旗、语言、国徽和国歌(UU Bahasa)的法律颁布以来，许多法院判决涉及印度尼西亚公民或印度尼西亚法人实体与外国人或外国法人实体签订的协议中使用外语(英语)。其中一个最著名的判决是取消PT Bangun Karya Pertama Lestasri与Nine AM之间的贷款协议，因为该协议违反了UU Bahasa第31条第1款。本文讨论了由国家法院、高等法院和最高法院解决的4个案件，在这些案件中，几乎所有的判决都取消了用外语写的协议。它影响了商人使用管辖语言条款和翻译条款成外语协议的基础上的合同自由和契约必须遵守
{"title":"Penggunaan Governing Languange Clause dan Translation Clause pada Perjanjian Berbahasa Asing","authors":"Velliana Tanaya, Harimurti Adi Nugroho","doi":"10.24090/VOLKSGEIST.V2I1.2387","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.24090/VOLKSGEIST.V2I1.2387","url":null,"abstract":"Since the enactment of Law No. 24/2009 on Flag, Language, National Emblems and the National Anthem (UU Bahasa), many court decisions arise related to the use of foreign languages (English) in agreements made between Indonesian Citizens or Indonesia Legal Entities with Foreigners or Foreign Legal Entities. One of the most well-known verdicts was the verdict that canceled the loan agreement between PT Bangun Karya Pertama Lestasri and Nine AM for violating Article 31 paragraph (1) UU Bahasa. This article discusses 4 cases that have been resolved by the State Court, the High Court and the Supreme Court where almost all of the decisions cancelled the agreements written in foreign languages. It is effected the businessman to use governing language clauses and translation clauses into foreign language agreements based on freedom of contract and pacta sunt servanda","PeriodicalId":34760,"journal":{"name":"Volksgeist","volume":"120 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2019-06-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"87946217","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2019-01-21DOI: 10.24090/volksgeist.v1i2.1843
Wildan Humaidi
Land redistribution is government policy to implement Article 33 Paragraph (3) of the 1945 Constitution, where the people is the holders of authority over the earth, the water and the other natural resources of Indonesia. In fact, the land redistribution in Law No. 19 of 2013 about the Farmers Protection and Empowerment, specifically Article 59 which states "convenience for Farmers to obtain Agricultural land as referred to in Article 58 paragraph (3) point a given in the form of leasing rights, concession permits, management permits, or utilization permits", considered to have violated the constitution. Through judicial review, the Court has issued Decision No. 87 / PUU-XI / 2013 and consider the phrase "leasing rights" to be contrary to the 1945 Constitution. This article attempts to elaborate two main problems; the form of government policy about land redistribution for agricultural land inthe Law Number 19 of 2013 about the Farmers Protection and Empowerment and the constitutionality of state land redistribution for agriculture in the Constitutional Court Decision No. 87 / PUU-XI / 2013.
{"title":"Menakar Konstitusionalitas Kebijakan Redistribusi Tanah untuk Lahan Pertanian dalam UU No. 19 Tahun 2013","authors":"Wildan Humaidi","doi":"10.24090/volksgeist.v1i2.1843","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.24090/volksgeist.v1i2.1843","url":null,"abstract":"Land redistribution is government policy to implement Article 33 Paragraph (3) of the 1945 Constitution, where the people is the holders of authority over the earth, the water and the other natural resources of Indonesia. In fact, the land redistribution in Law No. 19 of 2013 about the Farmers Protection and Empowerment, specifically Article 59 which states \"convenience for Farmers to obtain Agricultural land as referred to in Article 58 paragraph (3) point a given in the form of leasing rights, concession permits, management permits, or utilization permits\", considered to have violated the constitution. Through judicial review, the Court has issued Decision No. 87 / PUU-XI / 2013 and consider the phrase \"leasing rights\" to be contrary to the 1945 Constitution. This article attempts to elaborate two main problems; the form of government policy about land redistribution for agricultural land inthe Law Number 19 of 2013 about the Farmers Protection and Empowerment and the constitutionality of state land redistribution for agriculture in the Constitutional Court Decision No. 87 / PUU-XI / 2013.","PeriodicalId":34760,"journal":{"name":"Volksgeist","volume":"25 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2019-01-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"79291398","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2019-01-21DOI: 10.24090/volksgeist.v1i2.1946
M. Nasrudin
Regarding Indonesia as non-islamicstate, discourse of almsgiving management is very important to be discussed. Islam tends to argue that The State has to manages almsgiving. But in other hand, NKRI as non-islamicstate tends to avoiding intervention in religious practical event. When Soekarno taok rules, national revolution gave full attention, so the dinamics of almsgiving management has no intention. But when Soeharto took rules, intention to The State to manage almsgiving get bigger number. In other hand, The State gave counter-attack, the best it can. Based on bibliotical research, this paper displays the dinamics of almsgiving management law-policy in those eras and describes how far the shift was happened. Kata kunci: politik hukum zakat, pengelolaan zakat, UU Pengelolaan Zakat,
印尼作为一个非伊斯兰国家，关于施舍管理的论述是非常重要的。伊斯兰教倾向于认为国家必须管理施舍。但另一方面，NKRI作为非伊斯兰国家倾向于避免干预宗教实践事件。苏加诺上台执政时，国民革命全力以赴，因此施舍管理的动态毫无意图。但当苏哈托上台后，希望国家管理救济的人越来越多。另一方面，政府尽其所能进行了反击。本文在文献研究的基础上，展示了这两个时代的救济管理法律政策的动态，并描述了这种转变的发生程度。Kata kunci: politik hukum天课，pengelolaan天课，UU pengelolaan天课
{"title":"Pergeseran Politik Hukum Zakat dari Era Soekarno Menuju Soeharto","authors":"M. Nasrudin","doi":"10.24090/volksgeist.v1i2.1946","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.24090/volksgeist.v1i2.1946","url":null,"abstract":"Regarding Indonesia as non-islamicstate, discourse of almsgiving management is very important to be discussed. Islam tends to argue that The State has to manages almsgiving. But in other hand, NKRI as non-islamicstate tends to avoiding intervention in religious practical event. When Soekarno taok rules, national revolution gave full attention, so the dinamics of almsgiving management has no intention. But when Soeharto took rules, intention to The State to manage almsgiving get bigger number. In other hand, The State gave counter-attack, the best it can. Based on bibliotical research, this paper displays the dinamics of almsgiving management law-policy in those eras and describes how far the shift was happened. \u0000Kata kunci: politik hukum zakat, pengelolaan zakat, UU Pengelolaan Zakat, \u0000 ","PeriodicalId":34760,"journal":{"name":"Volksgeist","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2019-01-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"87364304","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2019-01-19DOI: 10.24090/volksgeist.v1i2.1844
R. Ridwan
The paradigmatic debate on the relationship between religion and state in Islam is an actual classic problem. The debate rises due to the absence of the normative basis and historical precedents that definitively state the relation between religion and state. Therefore, the paradigm formulation between religious and state relations is a matter of ijtihadiyah which is always open for debate. This article shows that theoretical debates about the relations between religious and state leads to three paradigms: integralistic, secularistic and symbiotic-mutualistic paradigms.
{"title":"Paradigma Relasi Agama dan Negara dalam Islam","authors":"R. Ridwan","doi":"10.24090/volksgeist.v1i2.1844","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.24090/volksgeist.v1i2.1844","url":null,"abstract":"The paradigmatic debate on the relationship between religion and state in Islam is an actual classic problem. The debate rises due to the absence of the normative basis and historical precedents that definitively state the relation between religion and state. Therefore, the paradigm formulation between religious and state relations is a matter of ijtihadiyah which is always open for debate. This article shows that theoretical debates about the relations between religious and state leads to three paradigms: integralistic, secularistic and symbiotic-mutualistic paradigms.","PeriodicalId":34760,"journal":{"name":"Volksgeist","volume":"36 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2019-01-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"85408121","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2018-12-31DOI: 10.24090/volksgeist.v1i2.1967
Suwardi Sagama
This article discusses the hierarchy of regulation formation. The problem being discussed in this article is related to the regulations that are formed contrary to the rules above and therefore, they are canceled or revised. Although explicitly in the formation of regulations, it is mandatory to follow the regulation hierarchy. Hence, it causes financial problems because the regulations cannot be implemented. It is juridical normative based research. The result of this research suggests that it is necessary to reformulate the regulations hierarchy on the formation of state regulations. It also suggests that the hierarchy of the regulations formation has positive and negative values. It is positive because it can maintain orderliness in the formation of regulations, while negative values will occur in the formation of the regulations. Therefore, to strengthen the hierarchy of the formulation of laws and regulations, it is necessary to have specifically certified legal drafter to form the regulations. As in the principle of legal fiction, that person is considered to know the rule can be realized properly.
{"title":"Reformulasi Hierarki Peraturan pada Pembentukan Peraturan Perundang-Undangan di Indonesia","authors":"Suwardi Sagama","doi":"10.24090/volksgeist.v1i2.1967","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.24090/volksgeist.v1i2.1967","url":null,"abstract":"This article discusses the hierarchy of regulation formation. The problem being discussed in this article is related to the regulations that are formed contrary to the rules above and therefore, they are canceled or revised. Although explicitly in the formation of regulations, it is mandatory to follow the regulation hierarchy. Hence, it causes financial problems because the regulations cannot be implemented. It is juridical normative based research. The result of this research suggests that it is necessary to reformulate the regulations hierarchy on the formation of state regulations. It also suggests that the hierarchy of the regulations formation has positive and negative values. It is positive because it can maintain orderliness in the formation of regulations, while negative values will occur in the formation of the regulations. Therefore, to strengthen the hierarchy of the formulation of laws and regulations, it is necessary to have specifically certified legal drafter to form the regulations. As in the principle of legal fiction, that person is considered to know the rule can be realized properly.","PeriodicalId":34760,"journal":{"name":"Volksgeist","volume":"80 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2018-12-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"72973486","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2018-12-31DOI: 10.24090/VOLKSGEIST.V1I2.1907
Eva Mir’atun Niswah
Intellectual Property Rights (IPR) is one of movable objects that can be represented according to waqf regulation (Undang-Undang No. 41 Tahun 2004 Tentang Wakaf). The previous regulations did not mention IPR as waqf object. IPR becomes waqf object because there is a shift of paradigm on productive waqf. However, the waqf regulation (Undang-Undang No. 41 Tahun 2004 Tentang Wakaf) has many juridical problems. For example, there is no specific explanation about IPR waqf as well as money waqf. Besides, the IPR practice is very rare due to unclear forms of IPR waqf. Juridical problems on IPR waqf are related to legal substance, legal structure and legal culture. On legal substance, there is no clear explanation and mechanism of IPR waqf. On legal structure, there is no clear explanations about who can be the wakif or nazir on IPR waqf. On legal culture, many people are still unfamiliar with intangible waqf object (the conventional waqf object is land). Therefore, the acceptance of an intangible object such as IPR as a waqf object is very low.
知识产权(IPR)是一种可以根据waqf规定(Undang-Undang No. 41 Tahun 2004 Tentang Wakaf)表示的可移动对象。此前的规定并没有将知识产权作为征税对象。知识产权成为waqf的对象，是因为生产性waqf的范式发生了转变。然而，waqf条例(Undang-Undang No. 41 Tahun 2004 Tentang Wakaf)存在许多法律问题。例如，对知识产权waqf和资金waqf没有具体的解释。此外，由于知识产权保护形式不明确，我国的知识产权保护实践十分罕见。知识产权保护的法律问题涉及法律实质、法律结构和法律文化。在法律实质上，知识产权waf没有明确的解释和机制。在法律结构上，对于谁是知识产权保护的监督者或监督者并没有明确的解释。在法律文化上，很多人对无形资产(传统的无形资产是土地)还很陌生。因此，像知识产权这样的无形对象作为waqf对象的接受度很低。
{"title":"Problematika Yuridis Wakaf Hak Kekayaan Intelektual di Indonesia","authors":"Eva Mir’atun Niswah","doi":"10.24090/VOLKSGEIST.V1I2.1907","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.24090/VOLKSGEIST.V1I2.1907","url":null,"abstract":"Intellectual Property Rights (IPR) is one of movable objects that can be represented according to waqf regulation (Undang-Undang No. 41 Tahun 2004 Tentang Wakaf). The previous regulations did not mention IPR as waqf object. IPR becomes waqf object because there is a shift of paradigm on productive waqf. However, the waqf regulation (Undang-Undang No. 41 Tahun 2004 Tentang Wakaf) has many juridical problems. For example, there is no specific explanation about IPR waqf as well as money waqf. Besides, the IPR practice is very rare due to unclear forms of IPR waqf. Juridical problems on IPR waqf are related to legal substance, legal structure and legal culture. On legal substance, there is no clear explanation and mechanism of IPR waqf. On legal structure, there is no clear explanations about who can be the wakif or nazir on IPR waqf. On legal culture, many people are still unfamiliar with intangible waqf object (the conventional waqf object is land). Therefore, the acceptance of an intangible object such as IPR as a waqf object is very low.","PeriodicalId":34760,"journal":{"name":"Volksgeist","volume":"145 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2018-12-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"85318964","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2018-12-31DOI: 10.24090/volksgeist.v1i2.1764
Muchimah Mh
Government Regulation No. 9 of 1975 related to the implementation of marriage was made to support and maximize the implementation of Law No. 1 of 1974 which had not yet proceeded properly. This paper examines Government Regulations related to the implementation of marriage from the perspective of sociology and anthropology of Islamic law. Although the rules already exist, some people still carry out marriages without being registered. This is anthropologically the same as releasing the protection provided by the government to its people for the sake of a rule. In the sociology of Islamic law, protection is a benchmark for the assessment of society in the social environment. Therefore the purpose of this paper is to find out how the implementation of marriage according to PP. No. 9 of 1975 concerning the Marriage Law in the socio-anthropological perspective of Islamic Law.
{"title":"Pelaksanaan Peraturan Pemerintah No. 9 Tahun 1975 dalam Perspektif Sosiologi dan Antropologi Hukum Islam","authors":"Muchimah Mh","doi":"10.24090/volksgeist.v1i2.1764","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.24090/volksgeist.v1i2.1764","url":null,"abstract":"Government Regulation No. 9 of 1975 related to the implementation of marriage was made to support and maximize the implementation of Law No. 1 of 1974 which had not yet proceeded properly. This paper examines Government Regulations related to the implementation of marriage from the perspective of sociology and anthropology of Islamic law. Although the rules already exist, some people still carry out marriages without being registered. This is anthropologically the same as releasing the protection provided by the government to its people for the sake of a rule. In the sociology of Islamic law, protection is a benchmark for the assessment of society in the social environment. Therefore the purpose of this paper is to find out how the implementation of marriage according to PP. No. 9 of 1975 concerning the Marriage Law in the socio-anthropological perspective of Islamic Law.","PeriodicalId":34760,"journal":{"name":"Volksgeist","volume":"6 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2018-12-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"82382198","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2018-12-27DOI: 10.24090/VOLKSGEIST.V1I2.1815
Rofingi Rofingi
Post-reforms goverment authority in Indonesia were no longer centralized. Decentralization then emerged as dispersion of the central goverment affairs to the regional goverment. This article discusses the incompatibility of the Geothermal Power Plant (PLTPB) project issued by the district / city government but was issued by the provincial government using the normative-analysis method. Government concurrent affairs are divided into two affairs; compulsory and optional. The existence of PLTPB in Banyumas district is one of the democratic matters of choice. One of PLTPB problems is that the regent of Banyumas do not aware of PLTPB policy. It can be seen that there is no synchronization and harmonization between the provincial and district /city governments. Negative impacts ranging from destruction of residents' land to river pollution are not handled. The authority of these provisions must be taken over by the regency / city government and there must be countermeasures against affected people so that good governance will be created.
{"title":"Analisis Distorsi Kebijakan Pemerintah Provinsi dengan Pemerintah Kabupaten terhadap Proyek PLTPB","authors":"Rofingi Rofingi","doi":"10.24090/VOLKSGEIST.V1I2.1815","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.24090/VOLKSGEIST.V1I2.1815","url":null,"abstract":"Post-reforms goverment authority in Indonesia were no longer centralized. Decentralization then emerged as dispersion of the central goverment affairs to the regional goverment. This article discusses the incompatibility of the Geothermal Power Plant (PLTPB) project issued by the district / city government but was issued by the provincial government using the normative-analysis method. Government concurrent affairs are divided into two affairs; compulsory and optional. The existence of PLTPB in Banyumas district is one of the democratic matters of choice. One of PLTPB problems is that the regent of Banyumas do not aware of PLTPB policy. It can be seen that there is no synchronization and harmonization between the provincial and district /city governments. Negative impacts ranging from destruction of residents' land to river pollution are not handled. The authority of these provisions must be taken over by the regency / city government and there must be countermeasures against affected people so that good governance will be created.","PeriodicalId":34760,"journal":{"name":"Volksgeist","volume":"128 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2018-12-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"82855384","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
京公网安备 11010802042870号
京ICP备2023020795号-1
扫码关注我们
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：