首页 > 最新文献

Neurobiology of Language最新文献

英文 中文
Neurobiology of Language: Reviewers List 语言神经生物学:审稿人名单
IF 3.2 Q1 LINGUISTICS Pub Date : 2021-12-01 DOI: 10.1162/nol_e_00064
{"title":"Neurobiology of Language: Reviewers List","authors":"","doi":"10.1162/nol_e_00064","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1162/nol_e_00064","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":34845,"journal":{"name":"Neurobiology of Language","volume":"2 1","pages":"665 - 667"},"PeriodicalIF":3.2,"publicationDate":"2021-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"45889098","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Auditory Word Comprehension Is Less Incremental in Isolated Words 孤立词的听觉理解增量较小
IF 3.2 Q1 LINGUISTICS Pub Date : 2021-09-10 DOI: 10.1101/2021.09.09.459631
Phoebe Gaston, Christian Brodbeck, C. Phillips, Ellen F. Lau
Partial speech input is often understood to trigger rapid and automatic activation of successively higher-level representations of words, from sound to meaning. Here we show evidence from magnetoencephalography that this type of incremental processing is limited when words are heard in isolation as compared to continuous speech. This suggests a less unified and automatic word recognition process than is often assumed. We present evidence from isolated words that neural effects of phoneme probability, quantified by phoneme surprisal, are significantly stronger than (statistically null) effects of phoneme-by-phoneme lexical uncertainty, quantified by cohort entropy. In contrast, we find robust effects of both cohort entropy and phoneme surprisal during perception of connected speech, with a significant interaction between the contexts. This dissociation rules out models of word recognition in which phoneme surprisal and cohort entropy are common indicators of a uniform process, even though these closely related information- theoretic measures both arise from the probability distribution of wordforms consistent with the input. We propose that phoneme surprisal effects reflect automatic access of a lower level of representation of the auditory input (e.g., wordforms) while the occurrence of cohort entropy effects is task-sensitive, driven by a competition process or a higher-level representation that is engaged late (or not at all) during the processing of single words.
部分语音输入通常被理解为触发从声音到意义的单词的连续更高级别表示的快速和自动激活。在这里,我们展示了脑磁图的证据,表明与连续语音相比,当孤立地听到单词时,这种类型的增量处理是有限的。这表明,与通常假设的相比,单词识别过程不那么统一和自动。我们从孤立单词中提出证据表明,通过音素推测量化的音素概率的神经效应显著强于通过队列熵量化的音位对音素词汇不确定性的(统计上为零)效应。相反,我们发现,在感知连接语音的过程中,队列熵和音素奇异性都产生了强大的影响,上下文之间存在显著的相互作用。这种分离排除了单词识别模型,在这些模型中,音素奇异性和队列熵是统一过程的常见指标,尽管这些密切相关的信息论度量都源于与输入一致的单词形式的概率分布。我们提出,音素惊奇效应反映了对听觉输入的较低级别表示(例如,单词形式)的自动访问,而队列熵效应的发生是任务敏感的,由竞争过程或在单个单词处理过程中较晚(或根本没有)参与的较高级别表示驱动。
{"title":"Auditory Word Comprehension Is Less Incremental in Isolated Words","authors":"Phoebe Gaston, Christian Brodbeck, C. Phillips, Ellen F. Lau","doi":"10.1101/2021.09.09.459631","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1101/2021.09.09.459631","url":null,"abstract":"Partial speech input is often understood to trigger rapid and automatic activation of successively higher-level representations of words, from sound to meaning. Here we show evidence from magnetoencephalography that this type of incremental processing is limited when words are heard in isolation as compared to continuous speech. This suggests a less unified and automatic word recognition process than is often assumed. We present evidence from isolated words that neural effects of phoneme probability, quantified by phoneme surprisal, are significantly stronger than (statistically null) effects of phoneme-by-phoneme lexical uncertainty, quantified by cohort entropy. In contrast, we find robust effects of both cohort entropy and phoneme surprisal during perception of connected speech, with a significant interaction between the contexts. This dissociation rules out models of word recognition in which phoneme surprisal and cohort entropy are common indicators of a uniform process, even though these closely related information- theoretic measures both arise from the probability distribution of wordforms consistent with the input. We propose that phoneme surprisal effects reflect automatic access of a lower level of representation of the auditory input (e.g., wordforms) while the occurrence of cohort entropy effects is task-sensitive, driven by a competition process or a higher-level representation that is engaged late (or not at all) during the processing of single words.","PeriodicalId":34845,"journal":{"name":"Neurobiology of Language","volume":"4 1","pages":"29 - 52"},"PeriodicalIF":3.2,"publicationDate":"2021-09-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"41907652","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1
Task-Induced Functional Connectivity of Picture Naming in Healthy Aging: The Impacts of Age and Task Complexity 健康老龄化中任务诱发的图片命名功能连通性:年龄和任务复杂性的影响
IF 3.2 Q1 LINGUISTICS Pub Date : 2020-06-29 DOI: 10.1162/nol_a_00007
P. Ferré, J. Jarret, S. Brambati, Pierre Bellec, Y. Joanette
The topological organization of the brain, governed by the capacity of brain regions to synchronize their activity, allows for cost-effective performance during everyday cognitive activity. Functional connectivity is an fMRI method deemed task-specific and demand-dependent. Although the brain undergoes significant changes during healthy aging, conceptual knowledge and word-production accuracy are generally preserved. The exploration of task-induced functional connectivity patterns during active picture naming may thus provide additional information about healthy functional cerebral mechanisms that are specifically adapted to the cognitive activity at hand. The goal of this study is to assess and describe age-related differences in functional connectivity during an overt picture-naming task, as well as to compare age-related differences under complex task demand, defined by lexical frequency. Results suggest both age-specific and task-specific mechanisms. In the context of preserved behavioral performance in a picture-naming task, older adults show a complex array of differences in functional connectivity architecture, including both increases and decreases. In brief, there is increased segregation and specialization of regions that are classically assigned to naming processes. Results also expand on previous word-production studies and suggest that motor regions are particularly subject to age-related differences. This study also provides the first indication that intrinsic task demand, as manipulated by lexical frequency, interacts little with the relationship between age and functional connectivity. Together, these findings confirm the value of task-induced functional connectivity analysis in revealing the brain organization that subserves task performance during healthy aging.
大脑的拓扑组织由大脑区域同步活动的能力控制,可以在日常认知活动中实现经济高效的表现。功能连接是一种功能磁共振成像方法,被认为是特定任务和需求相关的。尽管大脑在健康衰老过程中会发生显著变化,但概念知识和单词产生的准确性通常会得到保留。因此,在主动图片命名过程中对任务诱导的功能连接模式的探索可以提供关于专门适应手头认知活动的健康功能性大脑机制的额外信息。本研究的目的是评估和描述公开图片命名任务中与年龄相关的功能连接差异,并比较由词汇频率定义的复杂任务需求下的年龄相关差异。研究结果表明了特定年龄和特定任务的机制。在图片命名任务中保持行为表现的背景下,老年人在功能连接架构方面表现出一系列复杂的差异,包括增加和减少。简言之,传统上分配给命名过程的区域的分离和专业化程度有所增加。研究结果还扩展了先前的造词研究,并表明运动区域特别容易受到年龄差异的影响。这项研究还首次表明,由词汇频率操纵的内在任务需求与年龄和功能连接之间的关系几乎没有相互作用。总之,这些发现证实了任务诱导的功能连接分析在揭示健康衰老过程中辅助任务表现的大脑组织方面的价值。
{"title":"Task-Induced Functional Connectivity of Picture Naming in Healthy Aging: The Impacts of Age and Task Complexity","authors":"P. Ferré, J. Jarret, S. Brambati, Pierre Bellec, Y. Joanette","doi":"10.1162/nol_a_00007","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1162/nol_a_00007","url":null,"abstract":"The topological organization of the brain, governed by the capacity of brain regions to synchronize their activity, allows for cost-effective performance during everyday cognitive activity. Functional connectivity is an fMRI method deemed task-specific and demand-dependent. Although the brain undergoes significant changes during healthy aging, conceptual knowledge and word-production accuracy are generally preserved. The exploration of task-induced functional connectivity patterns during active picture naming may thus provide additional information about healthy functional cerebral mechanisms that are specifically adapted to the cognitive activity at hand. The goal of this study is to assess and describe age-related differences in functional connectivity during an overt picture-naming task, as well as to compare age-related differences under complex task demand, defined by lexical frequency. Results suggest both age-specific and task-specific mechanisms. In the context of preserved behavioral performance in a picture-naming task, older adults show a complex array of differences in functional connectivity architecture, including both increases and decreases. In brief, there is increased segregation and specialization of regions that are classically assigned to naming processes. Results also expand on previous word-production studies and suggest that motor regions are particularly subject to age-related differences. This study also provides the first indication that intrinsic task demand, as manipulated by lexical frequency, interacts little with the relationship between age and functional connectivity. Together, these findings confirm the value of task-induced functional connectivity analysis in revealing the brain organization that subserves task performance during healthy aging.","PeriodicalId":34845,"journal":{"name":"Neurobiology of Language","volume":"1 1","pages":"161-184"},"PeriodicalIF":3.2,"publicationDate":"2020-06-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1162/nol_a_00007","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"43920891","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 10
Lexical Access in Naming and Reading: Spatiotemporal Localization of Semantic Facilitation and Interference Using MEG 命名和阅读中的词汇获取:语义促进和干扰的时空定位
IF 3.2 Q1 LINGUISTICS Pub Date : 2020-06-01 DOI: 10.1162/nol_a_00008
Julien Dirani, L. Pylkkänen
Naming an object involves quick retrieval of a target word from long-term memory. Research using the semantic interference paradigm has shown that objects take longer to name when they are preceded by primes in the same semantic category. This has been interpreted as reflecting either competition during lexical selection or as an interference effect at a later, postlexical level. Since the behavioral finding has been a core argument for the existence of competition during lexical selection in naming, understanding its processing level is important for models of language production. We used MEG to determine the spatiotemporal localization of the interference effect. We also compared its neural signature to the effect of semantic relatedness in reading, in which relatedness is expected to speed up behavioral responses and reduce activity in the left superior temporal cortex at around 200–300 ms. This is exactly what we found. However, in naming, we observed a more complex pattern for our semantically related targets. First, the angular gyrus showed a facilitory pattern at 300–400 ms, likely reflecting aspects of lexical access. This was followed by a broadly distributed and sustained interference pattern that lasted until articulatory stages. More transient interference effects were also observed at 395–485 ms in the left STG and at ∼100–200 ms before articulation in the parietal cortex. Thus, our findings suggest that the semantic interference effect originates from both early and late sources, which may explain its varying localizations in previous literature.
命名一个物体需要从长期记忆中快速检索目标单词。使用语义干扰范式的研究表明,当物体前面有相同语义类别的启动词时,命名物体需要更长的时间。这被解释为要么反映了词汇选择过程中的竞争,要么反映了后来词汇后水平上的干扰效应。由于这一行为发现一直是命名过程中词汇选择竞争存在的核心论据,因此了解其加工水平对语言产生模型具有重要意义。我们使用脑磁图来确定干扰效应的时空定位。我们还将其神经特征与语义相关性在阅读中的影响进行了比较,其中语义相关性预计会在200-300毫秒左右加速行为反应并减少左颞上皮层的活动。这正是我们的发现。然而,在命名中,我们观察到与语义相关的目标有一个更复杂的模式。首先,角回在300-400毫秒时呈现便利模式,可能反映了词汇获取的各个方面。随后是一个广泛分布和持续的干扰模式,一直持续到发音阶段。在左STG 395-485 ms和顶叶皮质关节前100-200 ms也观察到更多的瞬态干扰效应。因此,我们的研究结果表明,语义干扰效应既有早期来源,也有后期来源,这可以解释先前文献中语义干扰效应的不同定位。
{"title":"Lexical Access in Naming and Reading: Spatiotemporal Localization of Semantic Facilitation and Interference Using MEG","authors":"Julien Dirani, L. Pylkkänen","doi":"10.1162/nol_a_00008","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1162/nol_a_00008","url":null,"abstract":"Naming an object involves quick retrieval of a target word from long-term memory. Research using the semantic interference paradigm has shown that objects take longer to name when they are preceded by primes in the same semantic category. This has been interpreted as reflecting either competition during lexical selection or as an interference effect at a later, postlexical level. Since the behavioral finding has been a core argument for the existence of competition during lexical selection in naming, understanding its processing level is important for models of language production. We used MEG to determine the spatiotemporal localization of the interference effect. We also compared its neural signature to the effect of semantic relatedness in reading, in which relatedness is expected to speed up behavioral responses and reduce activity in the left superior temporal cortex at around 200–300 ms. This is exactly what we found. However, in naming, we observed a more complex pattern for our semantically related targets. First, the angular gyrus showed a facilitory pattern at 300–400 ms, likely reflecting aspects of lexical access. This was followed by a broadly distributed and sustained interference pattern that lasted until articulatory stages. More transient interference effects were also observed at 395–485 ms in the left STG and at ∼100–200 ms before articulation in the parietal cortex. Thus, our findings suggest that the semantic interference effect originates from both early and late sources, which may explain its varying localizations in previous literature.","PeriodicalId":34845,"journal":{"name":"Neurobiology of Language","volume":"1 1","pages":"185-207"},"PeriodicalIF":3.2,"publicationDate":"2020-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1162/nol_a_00008","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"47847137","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 6
Age-Related Differences in Auditory Cortex Activity During Spoken Word Recognition 口语识别过程中听皮层活动的年龄相关差异
IF 3.2 Q1 LINGUISTICS Pub Date : 2020-03-05 DOI: 10.1101/2020.03.05.977306
Chad S. Rogers, Michael S. Jones, Sarah McConkey, Brent Spehar, Kristin J. Van Engen, M. Sommers, J. Peelle
Understanding spoken words requires the rapid matching of a complex acoustic stimulus with stored lexical representations. The degree to which the brain networks supporting spoken word recognition are affected by adult aging remains poorly understood. In the current study we used fMRI to measure the brain responses to spoken words in two conditions: an attentive listening condition, in which no response was required, and a repetition task. Listeners were 29 young adults (aged 19–30 years) and 32 older adults (aged 65–81 years) without self-reported hearing difficulty. We found largely similar patterns of activity during word perception for both young and older adults, centered on bilateral superior temporal gyrus. As expected, the repetition condition resulted in significantly more activity in areas related to motor planning and execution (including premotor cortex and supplemental motor area) compared to the attentive listening condition. Importantly, however, older adults showed significantly less activity in probabilistically-defined auditory cortex than young adults when listening to individual words in both the attentive listening and repetition tasks. Age differences in auditory cortex activity were seen selectively for words (no age differences were present for 1-channel vocoded speech, used as a control condition), and could not be easily explained by accuracy on the task, movement in the scanner, or hearing sensitivity (available on a subset of participants). These findings indicate largely similar patterns of brain activity for young and older adults when listening to words in quiet, but suggest less recruitment of auditory cortex by the older adults.
理解口语需要复杂的声学刺激与存储的词汇表示的快速匹配。支持口语识别的大脑网络在多大程度上受到成人衰老的影响,目前尚不清楚。在目前的研究中,我们使用功能磁共振成像来测量大脑在两种情况下对口语的反应:一种是专心听讲,不需要任何反应;另一种是重复任务。听众是29名年轻人(年龄在19-30岁之间)和32名老年人(年龄65-81岁之间),他们没有自我报告的听力困难。我们发现,年轻人和老年人在单词感知过程中的活动模式基本相似,集中在双侧颞上回。正如预期的那样,与专注听力条件相比,重复条件导致与运动计划和执行相关的区域(包括运动前皮层和补充运动区域)的活动显著增加。然而,重要的是,在专心听讲和重复任务中,老年人在概率定义的听觉皮层中的活动明显少于年轻人。听觉皮层活动的年龄差异被选择性地用于单词(作为对照条件的单声道声码语音不存在年龄差异),并且不能很容易地通过任务的准确性、扫描仪的移动或听力敏感性(可用于参与者的子集)来解释。这些发现表明,年轻人和老年人在安静地听单词时的大脑活动模式基本相似,但表明老年人对听觉皮层的吸收较少。
{"title":"Age-Related Differences in Auditory Cortex Activity During Spoken Word Recognition","authors":"Chad S. Rogers, Michael S. Jones, Sarah McConkey, Brent Spehar, Kristin J. Van Engen, M. Sommers, J. Peelle","doi":"10.1101/2020.03.05.977306","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.03.05.977306","url":null,"abstract":"Understanding spoken words requires the rapid matching of a complex acoustic stimulus with stored lexical representations. The degree to which the brain networks supporting spoken word recognition are affected by adult aging remains poorly understood. In the current study we used fMRI to measure the brain responses to spoken words in two conditions: an attentive listening condition, in which no response was required, and a repetition task. Listeners were 29 young adults (aged 19–30 years) and 32 older adults (aged 65–81 years) without self-reported hearing difficulty. We found largely similar patterns of activity during word perception for both young and older adults, centered on bilateral superior temporal gyrus. As expected, the repetition condition resulted in significantly more activity in areas related to motor planning and execution (including premotor cortex and supplemental motor area) compared to the attentive listening condition. Importantly, however, older adults showed significantly less activity in probabilistically-defined auditory cortex than young adults when listening to individual words in both the attentive listening and repetition tasks. Age differences in auditory cortex activity were seen selectively for words (no age differences were present for 1-channel vocoded speech, used as a control condition), and could not be easily explained by accuracy on the task, movement in the scanner, or hearing sensitivity (available on a subset of participants). These findings indicate largely similar patterns of brain activity for young and older adults when listening to words in quiet, but suggest less recruitment of auditory cortex by the older adults.","PeriodicalId":34845,"journal":{"name":"Neurobiology of Language","volume":"1 1","pages":"452 - 473"},"PeriodicalIF":3.2,"publicationDate":"2020-03-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"42118411","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 6
期刊
Neurobiology of Language
全部 Acc. Chem. Res. ACS Applied Bio Materials ACS Appl. Electron. Mater. ACS Appl. Energy Mater. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces ACS Appl. Nano Mater. ACS Appl. Polym. Mater. ACS BIOMATER-SCI ENG ACS Catal. ACS Cent. Sci. ACS Chem. Biol. ACS Chemical Health & Safety ACS Chem. Neurosci. ACS Comb. Sci. ACS Earth Space Chem. ACS Energy Lett. ACS Infect. Dis. ACS Macro Lett. ACS Mater. Lett. ACS Med. Chem. Lett. ACS Nano ACS Omega ACS Photonics ACS Sens. ACS Sustainable Chem. Eng. ACS Synth. Biol. Anal. Chem. BIOCHEMISTRY-US Bioconjugate Chem. BIOMACROMOLECULES Chem. Res. Toxicol. Chem. Rev. Chem. Mater. CRYST GROWTH DES ENERG FUEL Environ. Sci. Technol. Environ. Sci. Technol. Lett. Eur. J. Inorg. Chem. IND ENG CHEM RES Inorg. Chem. J. Agric. Food. Chem. J. Chem. Eng. Data J. Chem. Educ. J. Chem. Inf. Model. J. Chem. Theory Comput. J. Med. Chem. J. Nat. Prod. J PROTEOME RES J. Am. Chem. Soc. LANGMUIR MACROMOLECULES Mol. Pharmaceutics Nano Lett. Org. Lett. ORG PROCESS RES DEV ORGANOMETALLICS J. Org. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. A J. Phys. Chem. B J. Phys. Chem. C J. Phys. Chem. Lett. Analyst Anal. Methods Biomater. Sci. Catal. Sci. Technol. Chem. Commun. Chem. Soc. Rev. CHEM EDUC RES PRACT CRYSTENGCOMM Dalton Trans. Energy Environ. Sci. ENVIRON SCI-NANO ENVIRON SCI-PROC IMP ENVIRON SCI-WAT RES Faraday Discuss. Food Funct. Green Chem. Inorg. Chem. Front. Integr. Biol. J. Anal. At. Spectrom. J. Mater. Chem. A J. Mater. Chem. B J. Mater. Chem. C Lab Chip Mater. Chem. Front. Mater. Horiz. MEDCHEMCOMM Metallomics Mol. Biosyst. Mol. Syst. Des. Eng. Nanoscale Nanoscale Horiz. Nat. Prod. Rep. New J. Chem. Org. Biomol. Chem. Org. Chem. Front. PHOTOCH PHOTOBIO SCI PCCP Polym. Chem.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1