首页 > 最新文献

Sustainability: Science, Practice, and Policy最新文献

英文 中文
Flooding in Nigeria and Ghana: opportunities for partnerships in disaster-risk reduction 尼日利亚和加纳的洪水:在减少灾害风险方面建立伙伴关系的机会
Q1 Social Sciences Pub Date : 2021-12-15 DOI: 10.1080/15487733.2021.2004742
A. Echendu
Abstract Disasters annually ravage numerous African countries. Flooding is the most severe and prevalent adverse event and has serious implications for sustainable development. As the world is currently facing the COVID-19 pandemic, disasters such as flooding are still occurring but limited attention is being paid. This research analyzes the cause of flooding in Nigeria and Ghana, two countries regularly affected by floods. Previous analysis of the causes of flooding has mainly been done on a national scale. This work adopts a transnational approach by studying the flooding phenomena in both countries. It highlights an opportunity for international partnership in disaster-risk reduction (DRR) as both Nigeria and Ghana are signatories to the Sendai Framework for Disaster Risk Reduction that advocates an understanding of disaster risk and aims to foster international cooperation. Appreciating the root causes of flooding is the first step in building awareness of the common problem that could be the foundation of seeking and adopting solutions. A systematic review of peer-reviewed papers was conducted. This study finds that the underlying drivers of flooding are similar in the two nations and advocates research and data-sharing as ways of partnering to tackle the common problem. This finding has the potential to promote and facilitate capacity building for DRR and flood-risk management (FRM). Potential solutions could also be scaled to other countries of comparable profiles facing related flooding challenges. This approach is likely to yield better and quicker results while presenting opportunities for partnership in achieving the United Nations 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development that has already suffered COVID-19-related setbacks.
每年都有许多非洲国家遭受灾难。洪水是最严重和普遍的不利事件,对可持续发展有严重影响。当前,全球正面临新冠肺炎大流行,洪水等灾害仍在发生,但人们的关注有限。本研究分析了尼日利亚和加纳这两个经常受洪水影响的国家发生洪水的原因。以前对洪水成因的分析主要是在全国范围内进行的。这项工作采用跨国方法,研究了两国的洪水现象。它强调了在减少灾害风险(DRR)方面建立国际伙伴关系的机会,因为尼日利亚和加纳都是《仙台减少灾害风险框架》的签署国,该框架倡导对灾害风险的理解,旨在促进国际合作。了解洪水的根本原因是建立对这一共同问题的认识的第一步,这可能是寻求和采取解决办法的基础。对同行评议的论文进行了系统的审查。这项研究发现,两国洪水的潜在驱动因素是相似的,并主张通过研究和数据共享作为合作解决共同问题的方式。这一发现有可能促进和促进减灾和洪水风险管理(FRM)的能力建设。潜在的解决方案也可以推广到面临相关洪水挑战的其他具有类似概况的国家。这种做法可能会产生更好、更快的结果,同时为伙伴关系提供机会,以实现已经遭受covid -19相关挫折的联合国2030年可持续发展议程。
{"title":"Flooding in Nigeria and Ghana: opportunities for partnerships in disaster-risk reduction","authors":"A. Echendu","doi":"10.1080/15487733.2021.2004742","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/15487733.2021.2004742","url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Disasters annually ravage numerous African countries. Flooding is the most severe and prevalent adverse event and has serious implications for sustainable development. As the world is currently facing the COVID-19 pandemic, disasters such as flooding are still occurring but limited attention is being paid. This research analyzes the cause of flooding in Nigeria and Ghana, two countries regularly affected by floods. Previous analysis of the causes of flooding has mainly been done on a national scale. This work adopts a transnational approach by studying the flooding phenomena in both countries. It highlights an opportunity for international partnership in disaster-risk reduction (DRR) as both Nigeria and Ghana are signatories to the Sendai Framework for Disaster Risk Reduction that advocates an understanding of disaster risk and aims to foster international cooperation. Appreciating the root causes of flooding is the first step in building awareness of the common problem that could be the foundation of seeking and adopting solutions. A systematic review of peer-reviewed papers was conducted. This study finds that the underlying drivers of flooding are similar in the two nations and advocates research and data-sharing as ways of partnering to tackle the common problem. This finding has the potential to promote and facilitate capacity building for DRR and flood-risk management (FRM). Potential solutions could also be scaled to other countries of comparable profiles facing related flooding challenges. This approach is likely to yield better and quicker results while presenting opportunities for partnership in achieving the United Nations 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development that has already suffered COVID-19-related setbacks.","PeriodicalId":35192,"journal":{"name":"Sustainability: Science, Practice, and Policy","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2021-12-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"84271713","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 17
Challenging practices: experiences from community and individual living lab approaches 具有挑战性的实践:来自社区和个人生活实验室方法的经验
Q1 Social Sciences Pub Date : 2021-01-01 DOI: 10.1080/15487733.2021.1902062
K. Matschoss, F. Fahy, Henrike Rau, J. Backhaus, Gary Goggins, Eoin Grealis, E. Heiskanen, Tuija Kajoskoski, S. Laakso, Eeva-Lotta Apajalahti, Audley Genus, L. Godin, M. Iskandarova, Annika-Kathrin Musch, M. Sahakian, C. Scholl, E. Vadovics, V. Vasseur
Abstract In this article, we examine a change initiative designed to involve households in testing ways to transform two everyday practices ‒ heating and doing laundry. The research design included an examination of the challenges of changing practices either in a setting that fosters collective engagement or with individual households. Two different types of living labs were carried out simultaneously in eight European countries in Autumn–Winter 2018. We reflect on differences in results in terms of both changes in practices and the experiences of participating households that we argue can be at least partially attributed to householders’ engagement in different types of living labs. We discuss the implications of an individual-focused vs. community-oriented approach for change initiatives seeking to challenge social norms for sustainability transitions, concentrating in particular on differences in the nature of participants’ engagement and their willingness and ability to challenge routine practices. This is complemented by analytical reflections on the differences in design, interaction, and performance between the two types of living labs. We show that an explicit focus on collaborative engagement in living labs can produce results that reflect shared experiences, community support, challenging established norms, and collective commitment toward change.
在这篇文章中,我们研究了一项旨在让家庭参与测试的变革倡议,以改变两种日常做法——加热和洗衣服。研究设计包括对在促进集体参与或个别家庭的环境中改变实践的挑战的检查。2018年秋冬,两种不同类型的生活实验室在八个欧洲国家同时进行。我们在实践的变化和参与家庭的经验方面反映了结果的差异,我们认为至少可以部分归因于家庭参与不同类型的生活实验室。我们讨论了以个人为中心与以社区为导向的方法对寻求挑战可持续性转型的社会规范的变革倡议的影响,特别关注参与者参与的性质以及他们挑战常规做法的意愿和能力的差异。这是对两种类型的生活实验室在设计、交互和性能方面的差异的分析反思的补充。我们表明,明确关注生活实验室中的协作参与可以产生反映共享经验、社区支持、挑战既定规范和集体变革承诺的结果。
{"title":"Challenging practices: experiences from community and individual living lab approaches","authors":"K. Matschoss, F. Fahy, Henrike Rau, J. Backhaus, Gary Goggins, Eoin Grealis, E. Heiskanen, Tuija Kajoskoski, S. Laakso, Eeva-Lotta Apajalahti, Audley Genus, L. Godin, M. Iskandarova, Annika-Kathrin Musch, M. Sahakian, C. Scholl, E. Vadovics, V. Vasseur","doi":"10.1080/15487733.2021.1902062","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/15487733.2021.1902062","url":null,"abstract":"Abstract In this article, we examine a change initiative designed to involve households in testing ways to transform two everyday practices ‒ heating and doing laundry. The research design included an examination of the challenges of changing practices either in a setting that fosters collective engagement or with individual households. Two different types of living labs were carried out simultaneously in eight European countries in Autumn–Winter 2018. We reflect on differences in results in terms of both changes in practices and the experiences of participating households that we argue can be at least partially attributed to householders’ engagement in different types of living labs. We discuss the implications of an individual-focused vs. community-oriented approach for change initiatives seeking to challenge social norms for sustainability transitions, concentrating in particular on differences in the nature of participants’ engagement and their willingness and ability to challenge routine practices. This is complemented by analytical reflections on the differences in design, interaction, and performance between the two types of living labs. We show that an explicit focus on collaborative engagement in living labs can produce results that reflect shared experiences, community support, challenging established norms, and collective commitment toward change.","PeriodicalId":35192,"journal":{"name":"Sustainability: Science, Practice, and Policy","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2021-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"84869231","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 8
Resource-efficient and renewable energy transition in the five least developed countries of Asia: a post-COVID-19 assessment 亚洲五个最不发达国家的资源节约型和可再生能源转型:covid -19后评估
Q1 Social Sciences Pub Date : 2021-01-01 DOI: 10.1080/15487733.2021.2002025
Bishal Baniya, D. Giurco
Abstract The economic fallout from COVID-19 resulted in an economic slowdown and a contraction in economic output, changed economic structures, and reduced financial inflows in the five least developed countries (LDCs) of Asia – Bangladesh, Cambodia, Lao People’s Democratic Republic (PDR), Myanmar, and Nepal. This policy brief discusses these impacts in light of the LDC-graduation procedures of the United Nations together with the challenges that these countries face meeting their nationally determined contributions (NDCs) and the environment-related Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs 7, 12, and 13). The economic slowdown in Bangladesh, Lao PDR, and Myanmar and a contraction in economic output in Cambodia and Nepal has increased poverty in the five LDCs and is putting pressure on biomass resources in the rural areas of these countries. The change in the structures of their economies, which threatens to reverse processes of economic modernization in these LDCs, is undermining two decades of progress regarding the efficient use of natural resources and the associated reduction in greenhouse-gas (GHG) emissions per unit of gross domestic product (GDP). A decline in financial inflows such as remittances, foreign direct investment, and official development assistance (ODA) is also a risk to both short- and long-term prospects of further investment in renewable energy generation and low GHG-emissions technologies. This policy brief suggests policies that target technical interventions and incentivize small-scale renewable energy technologies that are less susceptible to microeconomic and macroeconomic impacts from external shocks such as COVID-19.
2019冠状病毒病的经济影响导致亚洲五个最不发达国家(孟加拉国、柬埔寨、老挝人民民主共和国、缅甸和尼泊尔)的经济放缓和经济产出收缩,经济结构发生变化,资金流入减少。本政策简报根据联合国的最不发达国家毕业程序,以及这些国家在实现国家自主贡献(NDCs)和与环境相关的可持续发展目标(sdg 7、12和13)时面临的挑战,讨论了这些影响。孟加拉国、老挝人民民主共和国和缅甸的经济放缓以及柬埔寨和尼泊尔的经济产出萎缩加剧了五个最不发达国家的贫困,并对这些国家农村地区的生物质资源造成了压力。这些最不发达国家经济结构的变化威胁到其经济现代化进程的逆转,正在破坏二十年来在有效利用自然资源和相应减少单位国内生产总值温室气体排放方面取得的进展。汇款、外国直接投资和官方发展援助等资金流入的减少也对可再生能源发电和低温室气体排放技术的进一步投资的短期和长期前景构成风险。本政策简报建议制定以技术干预为目标的政策,并鼓励不太容易受到COVID-19等外部冲击的微观经济和宏观经济影响的小规模可再生能源技术。
{"title":"Resource-efficient and renewable energy transition in the five least developed countries of Asia: a post-COVID-19 assessment","authors":"Bishal Baniya, D. Giurco","doi":"10.1080/15487733.2021.2002025","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/15487733.2021.2002025","url":null,"abstract":"Abstract The economic fallout from COVID-19 resulted in an economic slowdown and a contraction in economic output, changed economic structures, and reduced financial inflows in the five least developed countries (LDCs) of Asia – Bangladesh, Cambodia, Lao People’s Democratic Republic (PDR), Myanmar, and Nepal. This policy brief discusses these impacts in light of the LDC-graduation procedures of the United Nations together with the challenges that these countries face meeting their nationally determined contributions (NDCs) and the environment-related Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs 7, 12, and 13). The economic slowdown in Bangladesh, Lao PDR, and Myanmar and a contraction in economic output in Cambodia and Nepal has increased poverty in the five LDCs and is putting pressure on biomass resources in the rural areas of these countries. The change in the structures of their economies, which threatens to reverse processes of economic modernization in these LDCs, is undermining two decades of progress regarding the efficient use of natural resources and the associated reduction in greenhouse-gas (GHG) emissions per unit of gross domestic product (GDP). A decline in financial inflows such as remittances, foreign direct investment, and official development assistance (ODA) is also a risk to both short- and long-term prospects of further investment in renewable energy generation and low GHG-emissions technologies. This policy brief suggests policies that target technical interventions and incentivize small-scale renewable energy technologies that are less susceptible to microeconomic and macroeconomic impacts from external shocks such as COVID-19.","PeriodicalId":35192,"journal":{"name":"Sustainability: Science, Practice, and Policy","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2021-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"78871424","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5
Selecting renewable energy options: an application of multi-criteria decision making for Jordan 可再生能源选择:多标准决策在约旦的应用
Q1 Social Sciences Pub Date : 2021-01-01 DOI: 10.1080/15487733.2021.1930715
Nawras Shatnawi, H. Abu-Qdais, Farah Abu Qdais
Abstract Renewable energy sources are environmentally friendly and sustainable resources. However, there is no unique renewable energy resource that suits all countries. As such, nations must select the right option ‒ or combination of options ‒ that aligns with their local economic, technical, and environmental circumstances. Such a selection process is usually performed using a decision-making tool based on multi-criteria analysis. This study aims to find the most effective renewable energy option for Jordan by soliciting experts’ opinions under several criteria and sub-criteria. The collected responses of experts from the energy field were analyzed using the analytical hierarchy process (AHP). The AHP model used in the study consisted of four criteria, eleven sub-criteria, and four renewable energy alternatives. The results indicate that the technical criterion had the highest weight of 53.6% as compared to the environmental criterion which came second with a weight of 29.0% followed by geographical and socioeconomic criteria which have the lowest weights of 11.3% and 6.0%, respectively. The results reveal that under the technical criterion a high rank has given to maturity of the technology followed by availability of know-how with a weight of 0.875 and 0.125, respectively. The sequence of the preferable options based on the study results was: wind energy with 51.9%, followed by the solar energy option with 31.3%, and finally biomass and hydropower with 10.5% and 7.1%, respectively. Sensitivity analysis was performed and showed that the renewable energy options are not sensitive to the technical or environmental criteria, while they were slightly sensitive to the geographical and socioeconomic criteria.
可再生能源是一种环境友好、可持续发展的资源。然而,没有一种独特的可再生能源适合所有国家。因此,各国必须根据本国的经济、技术和环境情况选择正确的方案或多种方案的组合。这种选择过程通常使用基于多标准分析的决策工具来执行。本研究旨在通过在几个标准和子标准下征求专家意见,为约旦找到最有效的可再生能源选择。利用层次分析法(AHP)对收集到的能源领域专家的反馈进行分析。研究中使用的AHP模型包括4个标准、11个子标准和4个可再生能源替代方案。结果表明,技术指标的权重最高,为53.6%;环境指标的权重次之,为29.0%;地理和社会经济指标的权重最低,分别为11.3%和6.0%。结果表明,在技术标准下,技术成熟度排名较高,其次是专有技术的可获得性,权重分别为0.875和0.125。根据研究结果,优选方案的顺序为:风能占51.9%,其次是太阳能占31.3%,最后是生物质能和水电,分别占10.5%和7.1%。敏感性分析表明,可再生能源方案对技术或环境标准不敏感,而对地理和社会经济标准略微敏感。
{"title":"Selecting renewable energy options: an application of multi-criteria decision making for Jordan","authors":"Nawras Shatnawi, H. Abu-Qdais, Farah Abu Qdais","doi":"10.1080/15487733.2021.1930715","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/15487733.2021.1930715","url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Renewable energy sources are environmentally friendly and sustainable resources. However, there is no unique renewable energy resource that suits all countries. As such, nations must select the right option ‒ or combination of options ‒ that aligns with their local economic, technical, and environmental circumstances. Such a selection process is usually performed using a decision-making tool based on multi-criteria analysis. This study aims to find the most effective renewable energy option for Jordan by soliciting experts’ opinions under several criteria and sub-criteria. The collected responses of experts from the energy field were analyzed using the analytical hierarchy process (AHP). The AHP model used in the study consisted of four criteria, eleven sub-criteria, and four renewable energy alternatives. The results indicate that the technical criterion had the highest weight of 53.6% as compared to the environmental criterion which came second with a weight of 29.0% followed by geographical and socioeconomic criteria which have the lowest weights of 11.3% and 6.0%, respectively. The results reveal that under the technical criterion a high rank has given to maturity of the technology followed by availability of know-how with a weight of 0.875 and 0.125, respectively. The sequence of the preferable options based on the study results was: wind energy with 51.9%, followed by the solar energy option with 31.3%, and finally biomass and hydropower with 10.5% and 7.1%, respectively. Sensitivity analysis was performed and showed that the renewable energy options are not sensitive to the technical or environmental criteria, while they were slightly sensitive to the geographical and socioeconomic criteria.","PeriodicalId":35192,"journal":{"name":"Sustainability: Science, Practice, and Policy","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2021-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"72982753","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 15
Are liberal objections to consumption corridors justified? On the relation of freedom and limits in green liberal thought 自由主义者对消费走廊的反对有道理吗?论绿色自由主义思想中自由与限制的关系
Q1 Social Sciences Pub Date : 2021-01-01 DOI: 10.1080/15487733.2021.1878733
Tobias Gumbert, Carolin Bohn
Abstract The concept of consumption corridors proposes minimum and maximum limits to consumption on the normative premises of justice, human wellbeing, and guarantees of a good life for all. A central objection to the idea is that limits on resource use would interfere broadly with liberal freedoms, and consumption corridors would thus not be compatible with a liberal democratic setting. This claim rests on the assumption that protecting liberal freedom rights and enforcing limits constitute opposing forces. Here, liberal freedom is equated with the expansion of (unlimited) options of choice: the more options people have, and the fewer limits that are imposed on them, the greater the overall level of freedom. Therefore, discussions of limits are often reduced to negative restrictions and undemocratic demands. To problematize this rationale, we argue that in most liberal accounts, freedom and limits are mutually supportive of each other, and that the understanding of freedom as “the absence of limits” is in fact a particular understanding that has become dominant. Against this backdrop, we develop the notion of” green liberal freedom” that posits limits as a core concern of liberal understandings of freedom. We suggest that the recognition of the environment as “provider of basic needs,” democratic deliberation, and capability to reflect upon and judge conflicting values in light of individual and collective versions of the good life are important “building blocks” of an adjusted concept of freedom that is at once compatible with liberal thought and in support of the negotiation and implementation of consumption corridors.
消费走廊的概念提出了在正义、人类福祉和保证所有人过上美好生活的规范性前提下对消费的最小和最大限制。对这一观点的一个主要反对意见是,限制资源使用将广泛干扰自由主义的自由,因此,消费走廊将与自由民主的环境不相容。这一主张建立在保护自由权利和实施限制构成对立力量的假设之上。在这里,自由主义自由等同于(无限的)选择选项的扩展:人们拥有的选择越多,强加给他们的限制越少,整体自由水平就越高。因此,关于限制的讨论往往沦为消极的限制和不民主的要求。为了质疑这一基本原理,我们认为,在大多数自由主义的描述中,自由和限制是相互支持的,而将自由理解为“没有限制”实际上是一种特殊的理解,已经成为主流。在此背景下,我们提出了“绿色自由主义自由”的概念,将限制作为自由主义对自由理解的核心关切。我们认为,承认环境是“基本需求的提供者”,民主审议,以及根据个人和集体的美好生活版本反思和判断相互冲突的价值观的能力,是调整后的自由概念的重要“基石”,这种概念既与自由主义思想相容,又支持消费走廊的谈判和实施。
{"title":"Are liberal objections to consumption corridors justified? On the relation of freedom and limits in green liberal thought","authors":"Tobias Gumbert, Carolin Bohn","doi":"10.1080/15487733.2021.1878733","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/15487733.2021.1878733","url":null,"abstract":"Abstract The concept of consumption corridors proposes minimum and maximum limits to consumption on the normative premises of justice, human wellbeing, and guarantees of a good life for all. A central objection to the idea is that limits on resource use would interfere broadly with liberal freedoms, and consumption corridors would thus not be compatible with a liberal democratic setting. This claim rests on the assumption that protecting liberal freedom rights and enforcing limits constitute opposing forces. Here, liberal freedom is equated with the expansion of (unlimited) options of choice: the more options people have, and the fewer limits that are imposed on them, the greater the overall level of freedom. Therefore, discussions of limits are often reduced to negative restrictions and undemocratic demands. To problematize this rationale, we argue that in most liberal accounts, freedom and limits are mutually supportive of each other, and that the understanding of freedom as “the absence of limits” is in fact a particular understanding that has become dominant. Against this backdrop, we develop the notion of” green liberal freedom” that posits limits as a core concern of liberal understandings of freedom. We suggest that the recognition of the environment as “provider of basic needs,” democratic deliberation, and capability to reflect upon and judge conflicting values in light of individual and collective versions of the good life are important “building blocks” of an adjusted concept of freedom that is at once compatible with liberal thought and in support of the negotiation and implementation of consumption corridors.","PeriodicalId":35192,"journal":{"name":"Sustainability: Science, Practice, and Policy","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2021-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"89858139","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 6
The effects of COVID-19 on global economic output and sustainability: evidence from around the world and lessons for redress 2019冠状病毒病对全球经济产出和可持续性的影响:来自世界各地的证据和补救教训
Q1 Social Sciences Pub Date : 2021-01-01 DOI: 10.1080/15487733.2020.1860345
Anthony Kwame Morgan, Beatrice Aberinpoka Awafo, Theophilus Quartey
Abstract The coronavirus pandemic has ravaged the world, and its impact has permeated virtually all facets of society. The next wave of the COVID-19 shock will trigger another or more protracted recession in many countries, with annual growth projected to fall below recessionary thresholds. The resulting hit to global income as compared with forecasts for 2020 and 2021 will be enormous. The situation will be more precarious for developing countries across different income categories that are struggling with unsustainable debt burdens. Firms should implement business-continuity plans and ensure readiness for business constraints by prioritizing critical business activities and creating contingency plans for disruption. Governments should implement support programs to avert these difficulties. The shock to labor supply in each country should be managed in a manner that does not leave a post-COVID-19 world more disastrous. Close cooperation among all relevant actors is key to containing COVID-19 and mitigating its economic repercussions on countries around the globe. In addition, better waste management and commitment to climate change must take center stage to reduce the environmental impacts of COVID-19 on countries and the world.
冠状病毒大流行肆虐全球,其影响几乎渗透到社会的各个方面。下一波COVID-19冲击将在许多国家引发另一次或更持久的衰退,预计年增长率将跌破衰退阈值。与2020年和2021年的预测相比,由此对全球收入造成的冲击将是巨大的。对于正在与不可持续的债务负担作斗争的不同收入类别的发展中国家来说,情况将更加不稳定。公司应该实施业务连续性计划,并通过确定关键业务活动的优先级和制定中断的应急计划,确保为业务约束做好准备。政府应实施支持计划以避免这些困难。应对各国劳动力供应受到冲击的方式,不能让后covid -19时代的世界变得更加灾难性。所有相关行为体之间的密切合作是遏制COVID-19并减轻其对全球各国经济影响的关键。此外,为了减少COVID-19对各国和世界的环境影响,必须将更好的废物管理和应对气候变化的承诺放在中心位置。
{"title":"The effects of COVID-19 on global economic output and sustainability: evidence from around the world and lessons for redress","authors":"Anthony Kwame Morgan, Beatrice Aberinpoka Awafo, Theophilus Quartey","doi":"10.1080/15487733.2020.1860345","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/15487733.2020.1860345","url":null,"abstract":"Abstract The coronavirus pandemic has ravaged the world, and its impact has permeated virtually all facets of society. The next wave of the COVID-19 shock will trigger another or more protracted recession in many countries, with annual growth projected to fall below recessionary thresholds. The resulting hit to global income as compared with forecasts for 2020 and 2021 will be enormous. The situation will be more precarious for developing countries across different income categories that are struggling with unsustainable debt burdens. Firms should implement business-continuity plans and ensure readiness for business constraints by prioritizing critical business activities and creating contingency plans for disruption. Governments should implement support programs to avert these difficulties. The shock to labor supply in each country should be managed in a manner that does not leave a post-COVID-19 world more disastrous. Close cooperation among all relevant actors is key to containing COVID-19 and mitigating its economic repercussions on countries around the globe. In addition, better waste management and commitment to climate change must take center stage to reduce the environmental impacts of COVID-19 on countries and the world.","PeriodicalId":35192,"journal":{"name":"Sustainability: Science, Practice, and Policy","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2021-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"90171663","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 35
Consumption corridors in fashion: deliberations on upper consumption limits in minimalist fashion challenges 时尚中的消费走廊:对极简主义时尚挑战中消费上限的思考
Q1 Social Sciences Pub Date : 2021-01-01 DOI: 10.1080/15487733.2021.1891673
K. Vladimirova
Abstract Following food, mobility, and household-energy use, the consumption of textiles and fashion in Europe has been identified as the fourth highest environmental pressure category in terms of use of primary resources. Slow fashion advocates argue that it is necessary to reevaluate our relationship with clothes and to reduce overall fashion consumption in affluent countries. This article examines a relatively new practice of voluntary reduction of apparel consumption through the lens of three popular online minimalist fashion challenges that encourage participants to use a limited number of clothes, shoes, and accessories over a certain period. It explores how the initiators of the challenges frame the reasons that lead to downsizing, the benefits from undertaking the challenge and the idea of “good life” as the result of living with less. The findings indicate that rationales for voluntary reduction of apparel consumption are more focused on individual wellbeing than on altruistic concerns. The analysis also suggests that in defining an upper limit in apparel consumption (how many garments a wardrobe should contain), numerical indicators serve as a benchmark rather than a goal.
摘要:继食品、交通和家庭能源使用之后,纺织品和时装的消费在欧洲被确定为第四大环境压力类别,主要资源的使用。慢时尚的倡导者认为,有必要重新评估我们与服装的关系,并减少富裕国家的整体时尚消费。本文通过三个流行的在线极简主义时尚挑战来考察一种相对较新的自愿减少服装消费的做法,这些挑战鼓励参与者在一定时期内使用有限数量的衣服、鞋子和配饰。它探讨了挑战的发起者如何构建导致缩小规模的原因,接受挑战的好处以及“美好生活”的理念,因为生活得更少。研究结果表明,自愿减少服装消费的理由更侧重于个人福祉,而不是利他主义的考虑。分析还表明,在定义服装消费的上限(一个衣柜应该包含多少件衣服)时,数字指标是一个基准,而不是一个目标。
{"title":"Consumption corridors in fashion: deliberations on upper consumption limits in minimalist fashion challenges","authors":"K. Vladimirova","doi":"10.1080/15487733.2021.1891673","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/15487733.2021.1891673","url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Following food, mobility, and household-energy use, the consumption of textiles and fashion in Europe has been identified as the fourth highest environmental pressure category in terms of use of primary resources. Slow fashion advocates argue that it is necessary to reevaluate our relationship with clothes and to reduce overall fashion consumption in affluent countries. This article examines a relatively new practice of voluntary reduction of apparel consumption through the lens of three popular online minimalist fashion challenges that encourage participants to use a limited number of clothes, shoes, and accessories over a certain period. It explores how the initiators of the challenges frame the reasons that lead to downsizing, the benefits from undertaking the challenge and the idea of “good life” as the result of living with less. The findings indicate that rationales for voluntary reduction of apparel consumption are more focused on individual wellbeing than on altruistic concerns. The analysis also suggests that in defining an upper limit in apparel consumption (how many garments a wardrobe should contain), numerical indicators serve as a benchmark rather than a goal.","PeriodicalId":35192,"journal":{"name":"Sustainability: Science, Practice, and Policy","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2021-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"78708974","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 11
Water, sanitation, and hygiene (WASH) insecurity will exacerbate the toll of COVID-19 on women and girls in low-income countries 水、环境卫生和个人卫生(WASH)方面的不安全状况将加剧COVID-19对低收入国家妇女和女孩造成的损失
Q1 Social Sciences Pub Date : 2021-01-01 DOI: 10.1080/15487733.2021.1875682
E. Adams, Y. Adams, Christa Koki
Abstract The novel coronavirus disease (COVID-19) pandemic is having a significant global impact on livelihoods, health, and general well-being. This policy brief argues that in low-income countries (LICs) where water, sanitation, and hygiene (WASH) insecurity is widespread and closely entangled with poverty and other vulnerabilities, COVID-19 will have a particularly devastating impact on women and girls because they bear the disproportionate burden of water collection, sanitation, hygiene, and family welfare ‒ responsibilities embedded in longstanding sociocultural norms. WASH insecurity refers to the physical and relational inequities in WASH access. Using three pathways ‒ reproductive and perinatal health, cultural norms and the risk of COVID-19 infections, and physical and mental health ‒ we discuss how WASH insecurity will worsen the impact of COVID-19 on women and girls in LICs.
新型冠状病毒病(COVID-19)大流行正在对全球生计、健康和总体福祉产生重大影响。本政策简报认为,在低收入国家(LICs),水、环境卫生和个人卫生(WASH)不安全状况普遍存在,并与贫困和其他脆弱性密切相关,COVID-19将对妇女和女孩产生特别严重的影响,因为她们在收集水、环境卫生、个人卫生和家庭福利方面承担着不成比例的负担,而这些责任根植于长期的社会文化规范中。WASH不安全性是指WASH访问中的物理和关系不平等。我们通过三个途径——生殖和围产期健康、文化规范和COVID-19感染风险以及身心健康——讨论了WASH的不安全将如何加剧COVID-19对低收入国家妇女和女孩的影响。
{"title":"Water, sanitation, and hygiene (WASH) insecurity will exacerbate the toll of COVID-19 on women and girls in low-income countries","authors":"E. Adams, Y. Adams, Christa Koki","doi":"10.1080/15487733.2021.1875682","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/15487733.2021.1875682","url":null,"abstract":"Abstract The novel coronavirus disease (COVID-19) pandemic is having a significant global impact on livelihoods, health, and general well-being. This policy brief argues that in low-income countries (LICs) where water, sanitation, and hygiene (WASH) insecurity is widespread and closely entangled with poverty and other vulnerabilities, COVID-19 will have a particularly devastating impact on women and girls because they bear the disproportionate burden of water collection, sanitation, hygiene, and family welfare ‒ responsibilities embedded in longstanding sociocultural norms. WASH insecurity refers to the physical and relational inequities in WASH access. Using three pathways ‒ reproductive and perinatal health, cultural norms and the risk of COVID-19 infections, and physical and mental health ‒ we discuss how WASH insecurity will worsen the impact of COVID-19 on women and girls in LICs.","PeriodicalId":35192,"journal":{"name":"Sustainability: Science, Practice, and Policy","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2021-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"88416295","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 24
The role of community sharing in sustainability transformation: case studies from Norway 社区分享在可持续转型中的作用:来自挪威的案例研究
Q1 Social Sciences Pub Date : 2021-01-01 DOI: 10.1080/15487733.2021.1969820
H. Westskog, T. Julsrud, Steffen Kallbekken, K. Frenken, J. Schor, Karina Standal
Abstract Based on three case studies of community sharing in different sectors of society, we address how and under what conditions community sharing can contribute to sustainability transformation. Considering modes of exchange an leverage points, we analyze how community sharing can add to transformation when sharing systems are designed to intervene at both shallow and deep leverage points. Our case studies indicate that sustainability transformations are dynamic processes in which even shallow levels of leverage can affect change. We show that community sharing can be upscaled through restructuring institutions via redistributive exchange systems, while initiatives supported by strong and lasting institutions are in the best position to contribute to change. Furthermore, our results suggest that sharing practices may strengthen ties and trust in an enterprise or local community. Finally, community-sharing systems that build on existing values in line with sustainability transformation may be in the best position to contribute to deeper levers of change.
摘要本文通过对社区共享在不同社会领域的三个案例研究,探讨了社区共享如何以及在什么条件下促进可持续转型。考虑到交换模式和杠杆点,我们分析了当共享系统被设计为在浅杠杆点和深杠杆点进行干预时,社区共享如何增加转型。我们的案例研究表明,可持续转型是一个动态过程,在这个过程中,即使是很浅的杠杆水平也会影响变化。我们的研究表明,社区共享可以通过再分配交换系统重组机构来扩大,而由强大而持久的机构支持的举措最有利于促进变革。此外,我们的研究结果表明,共享实践可以加强企业或当地社区的联系和信任。最后,建立在符合可持续性转型的现有价值基础上的社区共享系统可能最有利于促进更深层次的变革杠杆。
{"title":"The role of community sharing in sustainability transformation: case studies from Norway","authors":"H. Westskog, T. Julsrud, Steffen Kallbekken, K. Frenken, J. Schor, Karina Standal","doi":"10.1080/15487733.2021.1969820","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/15487733.2021.1969820","url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Based on three case studies of community sharing in different sectors of society, we address how and under what conditions community sharing can contribute to sustainability transformation. Considering modes of exchange an leverage points, we analyze how community sharing can add to transformation when sharing systems are designed to intervene at both shallow and deep leverage points. Our case studies indicate that sustainability transformations are dynamic processes in which even shallow levels of leverage can affect change. We show that community sharing can be upscaled through restructuring institutions via redistributive exchange systems, while initiatives supported by strong and lasting institutions are in the best position to contribute to change. Furthermore, our results suggest that sharing practices may strengthen ties and trust in an enterprise or local community. Finally, community-sharing systems that build on existing values in line with sustainability transformation may be in the best position to contribute to deeper levers of change.","PeriodicalId":35192,"journal":{"name":"Sustainability: Science, Practice, and Policy","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2021-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"84518564","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5
Co-producing urban transport systems: adapting a global model in Dar es Salaam 共同生产城市交通系统:在达累斯萨拉姆采用全球模式
Q1 Social Sciences Pub Date : 2021-01-01 DOI: 10.1080/15487733.2020.1862545
Malve Jacobsen
Abstract By advancing a socio-technical perspective on transport and mobility, this article traces the realization of bus rapid transit (BRT) in Dar es Salaam, Tanzania. Referring to the framework of co-production, it is argued that transport systems can only come into being through the flexible interaction of humans and technology. Global consultants claim that BRT is an ideal choice for cities that strive for affordable, fast, and sustainable solutions in times of climate change and urban growth because this model enables a rapid and sustainable transition of urban transport. In practice, BRT systems often do not come into existence as planned and do not fulfill the promises offered by consultants who are often involved in their conception and construction. Drawing on interviews and participatory observation, this article elaborates how the recently implemented BRT system in Dar es Salaam depends on the interaction of technology and society. It is only because humans took over when “smart” technologies were dysfunctional or absent that BRT operations could be secured and contribute to a transition of the city’s transport sector. Accordingly, a sustainable transition depends more on socio-technical practices, the fluidity of the system, and the adaptation of its users rather than on global standards or technological innovation.
摘要:通过推进社会技术角度的运输和流动性,本文追溯了在达累斯萨拉姆,坦桑尼亚实现快速公交(BRT)。在共同生产的框架下,运输系统只有通过人与技术的灵活互动才能形成。全球顾问声称,在气候变化和城市增长的时代,BRT是寻求经济、快速和可持续解决方案的城市的理想选择,因为这种模式能够实现城市交通的快速和可持续转型。在实践中,BRT系统通常不会按照计划出现,也不会履行顾问提供的承诺,这些顾问通常参与其概念和建设。通过访谈和参与式观察,本文阐述了达累斯萨拉姆最近实施的快速公交系统如何依赖于技术和社会的相互作用。只有当“智能”技术功能失调或缺失时,人类才会接管,BRT运营才能得到保障,并有助于城市交通部门的转型。因此,可持续的过渡更多地取决于社会技术实践、系统的流动性和用户的适应性,而不是全球标准或技术创新。
{"title":"Co-producing urban transport systems: adapting a global model in Dar es Salaam","authors":"Malve Jacobsen","doi":"10.1080/15487733.2020.1862545","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/15487733.2020.1862545","url":null,"abstract":"Abstract By advancing a socio-technical perspective on transport and mobility, this article traces the realization of bus rapid transit (BRT) in Dar es Salaam, Tanzania. Referring to the framework of co-production, it is argued that transport systems can only come into being through the flexible interaction of humans and technology. Global consultants claim that BRT is an ideal choice for cities that strive for affordable, fast, and sustainable solutions in times of climate change and urban growth because this model enables a rapid and sustainable transition of urban transport. In practice, BRT systems often do not come into existence as planned and do not fulfill the promises offered by consultants who are often involved in their conception and construction. Drawing on interviews and participatory observation, this article elaborates how the recently implemented BRT system in Dar es Salaam depends on the interaction of technology and society. It is only because humans took over when “smart” technologies were dysfunctional or absent that BRT operations could be secured and contribute to a transition of the city’s transport sector. Accordingly, a sustainable transition depends more on socio-technical practices, the fluidity of the system, and the adaptation of its users rather than on global standards or technological innovation.","PeriodicalId":35192,"journal":{"name":"Sustainability: Science, Practice, and Policy","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2021-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"85197213","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3
期刊
Sustainability: Science, Practice, and Policy
全部 Acc. Chem. Res. ACS Applied Bio Materials ACS Appl. Electron. Mater. ACS Appl. Energy Mater. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces ACS Appl. Nano Mater. ACS Appl. Polym. Mater. ACS BIOMATER-SCI ENG ACS Catal. ACS Cent. Sci. ACS Chem. Biol. ACS Chemical Health & Safety ACS Chem. Neurosci. ACS Comb. Sci. ACS Earth Space Chem. ACS Energy Lett. ACS Infect. Dis. ACS Macro Lett. ACS Mater. Lett. ACS Med. Chem. Lett. ACS Nano ACS Omega ACS Photonics ACS Sens. ACS Sustainable Chem. Eng. ACS Synth. Biol. Anal. Chem. BIOCHEMISTRY-US Bioconjugate Chem. BIOMACROMOLECULES Chem. Res. Toxicol. Chem. Rev. Chem. Mater. CRYST GROWTH DES ENERG FUEL Environ. Sci. Technol. Environ. Sci. Technol. Lett. Eur. J. Inorg. Chem. IND ENG CHEM RES Inorg. Chem. J. Agric. Food. Chem. J. Chem. Eng. Data J. Chem. Educ. J. Chem. Inf. Model. J. Chem. Theory Comput. J. Med. Chem. J. Nat. Prod. J PROTEOME RES J. Am. Chem. Soc. LANGMUIR MACROMOLECULES Mol. Pharmaceutics Nano Lett. Org. Lett. ORG PROCESS RES DEV ORGANOMETALLICS J. Org. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. A J. Phys. Chem. B J. Phys. Chem. C J. Phys. Chem. Lett. Analyst Anal. Methods Biomater. Sci. Catal. Sci. Technol. Chem. Commun. Chem. Soc. Rev. CHEM EDUC RES PRACT CRYSTENGCOMM Dalton Trans. Energy Environ. Sci. ENVIRON SCI-NANO ENVIRON SCI-PROC IMP ENVIRON SCI-WAT RES Faraday Discuss. Food Funct. Green Chem. Inorg. Chem. Front. Integr. Biol. J. Anal. At. Spectrom. J. Mater. Chem. A J. Mater. Chem. B J. Mater. Chem. C Lab Chip Mater. Chem. Front. Mater. Horiz. MEDCHEMCOMM Metallomics Mol. Biosyst. Mol. Syst. Des. Eng. Nanoscale Nanoscale Horiz. Nat. Prod. Rep. New J. Chem. Org. Biomol. Chem. Org. Chem. Front. PHOTOCH PHOTOBIO SCI PCCP Polym. Chem.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1