首页 > 最新文献

Stapp car crash journal最新文献

英文 中文
Machine-Learning-Accelerated Simulations for the Design of Airbag Constrained by Obstacles at Rest. 用于设计静止时受障碍物限制的安全气囊的机器学习加速模拟。
Q2 Medicine Pub Date : 2024-06-01 Epub Date: 2024-03-03 DOI: 10.4271/2023-22-0001
José E Valenzuela Del Río, Richard Lancashire, Karan Chatrath, Peter Ritmeijer, Elena Arvanitis, Lucia Mirabella

Predicting airbag deployment geometries is an important task for airbag and vehicle designers to meet safety standards based on biomechanical injury risk functions. This prediction is also an extraordinarily complex problem given the number of disciplines and their interactions. State-of-the-art airbag deployment geometry simulations (including time history) entail large, computationally expensive numerical methods such as finite element analysis (FEA) and computational fluid dynamics (CFD), among others. This complexity results in exceptionally large simulation times, making thorough exploration of the design space prohibitive. This paper proposes new parametric simulation models which drastically accelerate airbag deployment geometry predictions while maintaining the accuracy of the airbag deployment geometry at reasonable levels; these models, called herein machine learning (ML)-accelerated models, blend physical system modes with data-driven techniques to accomplish fast predictions within a design space defined by airbag and impactor parameters. These ML-accelerated models are evaluated with virtual test cases of increasing complexity: from airbag deployments against a locked deformable obstacle to airbag deployments against free rigid obstacles; the dimension of the tested design spaces is up to six variables. ML training times are documented for completeness; thus, airbag design explorers or optimization engineers can assess the full budget for ML-accelerated approaches including training. In these test cases, the ML-accelerated simulation models run three orders of magnitude faster than the high-fidelity multi-physics methods, while accuracies are kept within reasonable levels within the design space.

预测安全气囊展开的几何形状是安全气囊和车辆设计人员的一项重要任务,以满足基于生物力学伤害风险函数的安全标准。由于涉及多个学科及其相互作用,这项预测工作也是一个异常复杂的问题。最先进的安全气囊展开几何模拟(包括时间历程)需要采用计算成本高昂的大型数值方法,如有限元分析 (FEA) 和计算流体动力学 (CFD) 等。这种复杂性导致仿真时间特别长,使彻底探索设计空间变得困难重重。本文提出了新的参数仿真模型,可大幅加快安全气囊展开几何形状的预测速度,同时将安全气囊展开几何形状的精度保持在合理水平;这些模型被称为机器学习(ML)加速模型,将物理系统模式与数据驱动技术相结合,在由安全气囊和撞击器参数定义的设计空间内完成快速预测。这些机器学习加速模型通过复杂程度不断增加的虚拟测试案例进行评估:从针对锁定可变形障碍物的安全气囊部署,到针对自由刚性障碍物的安全气囊部署;测试设计空间的维度多达六个变量。完整记录了 ML 训练时间;因此,安全气囊设计探索者或优化工程师可以评估包括训练在内的 ML 加速方法的全部预算。在这些测试案例中,ML 加速仿真模型的运行速度比高保真多物理场方法快三个数量级,同时精度在设计空间内保持在合理水平。
{"title":"Machine-Learning-Accelerated Simulations for the Design of Airbag Constrained by Obstacles at Rest.","authors":"José E Valenzuela Del Río, Richard Lancashire, Karan Chatrath, Peter Ritmeijer, Elena Arvanitis, Lucia Mirabella","doi":"10.4271/2023-22-0001","DOIUrl":"10.4271/2023-22-0001","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Predicting airbag deployment geometries is an important task for airbag and vehicle designers to meet safety standards based on biomechanical injury risk functions. This prediction is also an extraordinarily complex problem given the number of disciplines and their interactions. State-of-the-art airbag deployment geometry simulations (including time history) entail large, computationally expensive numerical methods such as finite element analysis (FEA) and computational fluid dynamics (CFD), among others. This complexity results in exceptionally large simulation times, making thorough exploration of the design space prohibitive. This paper proposes new parametric simulation models which drastically accelerate airbag deployment geometry predictions while maintaining the accuracy of the airbag deployment geometry at reasonable levels; these models, called herein machine learning (ML)-accelerated models, blend physical system modes with data-driven techniques to accomplish fast predictions within a design space defined by airbag and impactor parameters. These ML-accelerated models are evaluated with virtual test cases of increasing complexity: from airbag deployments against a locked deformable obstacle to airbag deployments against free rigid obstacles; the dimension of the tested design spaces is up to six variables. ML training times are documented for completeness; thus, airbag design explorers or optimization engineers can assess the full budget for ML-accelerated approaches including training. In these test cases, the ML-accelerated simulation models run three orders of magnitude faster than the high-fidelity multi-physics methods, while accuracies are kept within reasonable levels within the design space.</p>","PeriodicalId":35289,"journal":{"name":"Stapp car crash journal","volume":"67 ","pages":"1-13"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"140185767","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Evaluation of DAMAGE Algorithm in Frontal Crashes. 评估正面碰撞中的 DAMAGE 算法。
Q2 Medicine Pub Date : 2024-06-01 Epub Date: 2024-04-16 DOI: 10.4271/2023-22-0006
Priya Prasad, Saeed D Barbat, Anil Kalra, Dainius J Dalmotas

With the current trend of including the evaluation of the risk of brain injuries in vehicle crashes due to rotational kinematics of the head, two injury criteria have been introduced since 2013 - BrIC and DAMAGE. BrIC was developed by NHTSA in 2013 and was suggested for inclusion in the US NCAP for frontal and side crashes. DAMAGE has been developed by UVa under the sponsorship of JAMA and JARI and has been accepted tentatively by the EuroNCAP. Although BrIC in US crash testing is known and reported, DAMAGE in tests of the US fleet is relatively unknown. The current paper will report on DAMAGE in NCAP-like tests and potential future frontal crash tests involving substantial rotation about the three axes of occupant heads. Distribution of DAMAGE of three-point belted occupants without airbags will also be discussed. Prediction of brain injury risks from the tests have been compared to the risks in the real world. Although DAMAGE correlates well with MPS in the human brain model across several test scenarios, the predicted risk of AIS2+ brain injuries are too high compared to real-world experience. The prediction of AIS4+ brain injury risk in lower velocity crashes is good, but too high in NCAP-like and high speed angular frontal crashes.

目前的趋势是将车辆碰撞中由于头部旋转运动学导致的脑损伤风险评估纳入其中,因此自 2013 年起引入了两个损伤标准 - BrIC 和 DAMAGE。BrIC 由美国国家公路交通安全管理局(NHTSA)于 2013 年开发,并建议将其纳入美国 NCAP 的正面和侧面碰撞评估中。DAMAGE 由 UVa 在 JAMA 和 JARI 的赞助下开发,已被欧洲 NCAP 暂时接受。虽然美国碰撞测试中的 BrIC 已为人熟知并有所报道,但美国车队测试中的 DAMAGE 却相对鲜为人知。本论文将报告类似 NCAP 测试和未来可能进行的正面碰撞测试中的 DAMAGE,这些测试涉及乘员头部三个轴的大幅旋转。此外,还将讨论不带安全气囊的三点式安全带乘员的 DAMAGE 分布情况。测试中对脑损伤风险的预测与现实世界中的风险进行了比较。虽然在多个测试场景中,DAMAGE 与人脑模型中的 MPS 都有很好的相关性,但与真实世界的经验相比,AIS2+ 脑损伤的预测风险过高。在低速碰撞中,AIS4+脑损伤风险的预测结果良好,但在类似 NCAP 和高速角度正面碰撞中,预测结果过高。
{"title":"Evaluation of DAMAGE Algorithm in Frontal Crashes.","authors":"Priya Prasad, Saeed D Barbat, Anil Kalra, Dainius J Dalmotas","doi":"10.4271/2023-22-0006","DOIUrl":"10.4271/2023-22-0006","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>With the current trend of including the evaluation of the risk of brain injuries in vehicle crashes due to rotational kinematics of the head, two injury criteria have been introduced since 2013 - BrIC and DAMAGE. BrIC was developed by NHTSA in 2013 and was suggested for inclusion in the US NCAP for frontal and side crashes. DAMAGE has been developed by UVa under the sponsorship of JAMA and JARI and has been accepted tentatively by the EuroNCAP. Although BrIC in US crash testing is known and reported, DAMAGE in tests of the US fleet is relatively unknown. The current paper will report on DAMAGE in NCAP-like tests and potential future frontal crash tests involving substantial rotation about the three axes of occupant heads. Distribution of DAMAGE of three-point belted occupants without airbags will also be discussed. Prediction of brain injury risks from the tests have been compared to the risks in the real world. Although DAMAGE correlates well with MPS in the human brain model across several test scenarios, the predicted risk of AIS2+ brain injuries are too high compared to real-world experience. The prediction of AIS4+ brain injury risk in lower velocity crashes is good, but too high in NCAP-like and high speed angular frontal crashes.</p>","PeriodicalId":35289,"journal":{"name":"Stapp car crash journal","volume":"67 ","pages":"171-179"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"140860750","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Ligaments Laxity and Elongation at Injuryin Flexed knees during Lateral Impact Conditions. 侧面碰撞条件下弯曲膝盖受伤时韧带松弛和伸长率。
Q2 Medicine Pub Date : 2022-11-01 DOI: 10.4271/2022-22-0003
Sahar Benadi, Xavier Trosseille, Philippe Petit, Jérôme Uriot, Yoann Lafon, Philippe Beillas

The knee is one of the regions of interest for pedestrian safety assessment. Past testing to study knee ligament injuries for pedestrian impact only included knees in full extension and mostly focused on global responses. As the knee flexion angle and the initial ligament laxity may affect the elongation at which ligaments fail, the objectives of this study were (1) to design an experimental protocol to assess the laxity of knee ligaments before measuring their elongation at failure, (2) to apply it in paired knee tests at two flexion angles (10 and 45 degrees). The laxity tests combined strain gauges to measure bone strains near insertions that would result from ligament forces and a custom machine to exercise the knee in all directions. Failure was assessed using a four-point bending setup with additional degrees of freedom on the axial rotation and displacement of the femur. A template was designed to ensure that the two setups used the exact same starting position. The protocol was applied to six pairs of knees which were tested until the failure of all ligaments. In the laxity tests, a higher compliance of the knee was observed at 45 degrees compared to 10 degrees. Minimum lengths associated with the beginning of bone loading were also successfully identified for the collateral ligaments, but the process was less successful for the cruciate ligaments. The failure tests suggested increased elongation and length at failure for the ligaments and their bundles at 45°. This could be consistent with the higher compliance in static test, but the minimum lengths identified on the collaterals did not explain this difference during failure. The results highlight the possible relationship between position, laxity and elongation at failure in a lateral loading and provide a dataset including 3D coordinates of insertions to continue the investigation using a modelling approach. Perspectives are also outlined to improve upon the laxity determination protocol.

膝盖是行人安全评估的关注区域之一。过去研究行人撞击膝盖韧带损伤的测试只包括完全伸展的膝盖,主要关注全球反应。由于膝关节屈曲角度和初始韧带松弛度可能会影响韧带失效时的伸长率,本研究的目的是(1)设计一个实验方案,在测量其失效伸长率之前评估膝关节韧带松弛度,(2)将其应用于两个屈曲角度(10度和45度)的成对膝关节测试。松弛度测试结合了应变仪来测量插入处附近的骨骼应变,这将由韧带力和一台定制的机器来全方位锻炼膝盖。使用四点弯曲装置评估失效,股骨轴向旋转和位移具有额外的自由度。设计了一个模板,以确保两个设置使用完全相同的起始位置。该方案应用于六对膝盖,直到所有韧带失效。在松弛度测试中,与10度相比,在45度时观察到膝盖的顺应性更高。副韧带也成功地确定了与骨负荷开始相关的最小长度,但十字韧带的这一过程不太成功。失效测试表明,韧带及其束在45°时的断裂伸长率和长度增加。这可能与静态测试中较高的顺应性一致,但抵押品上确定的最小长度并不能解释失败期间的这种差异。研究结果强调了横向载荷中位置、松弛度和失效伸长率之间的可能关系,并提供了一个包括插入物三维坐标的数据集,以使用建模方法继续研究。还概述了改进松懈度确定方案的前景。
{"title":"Ligaments Laxity and Elongation at Injuryin Flexed knees during Lateral Impact Conditions.","authors":"Sahar Benadi,&nbsp;Xavier Trosseille,&nbsp;Philippe Petit,&nbsp;Jérôme Uriot,&nbsp;Yoann Lafon,&nbsp;Philippe Beillas","doi":"10.4271/2022-22-0003","DOIUrl":"10.4271/2022-22-0003","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The knee is one of the regions of interest for pedestrian safety assessment. Past testing to study knee ligament injuries for pedestrian impact only included knees in full extension and mostly focused on global responses. As the knee flexion angle and the initial ligament laxity may affect the elongation at which ligaments fail, the objectives of this study were (1) to design an experimental protocol to assess the laxity of knee ligaments before measuring their elongation at failure, (2) to apply it in paired knee tests at two flexion angles (10 and 45 degrees). The laxity tests combined strain gauges to measure bone strains near insertions that would result from ligament forces and a custom machine to exercise the knee in all directions. Failure was assessed using a four-point bending setup with additional degrees of freedom on the axial rotation and displacement of the femur. A template was designed to ensure that the two setups used the exact same starting position. The protocol was applied to six pairs of knees which were tested until the failure of all ligaments. In the laxity tests, a higher compliance of the knee was observed at 45 degrees compared to 10 degrees. Minimum lengths associated with the beginning of bone loading were also successfully identified for the collateral ligaments, but the process was less successful for the cruciate ligaments. The failure tests suggested increased elongation and length at failure for the ligaments and their bundles at 45°. This could be consistent with the higher compliance in static test, but the minimum lengths identified on the collaterals did not explain this difference during failure. The results highlight the possible relationship between position, laxity and elongation at failure in a lateral loading and provide a dataset including 3D coordinates of insertions to continue the investigation using a modelling approach. Perspectives are also outlined to improve upon the laxity determination protocol.</p>","PeriodicalId":35289,"journal":{"name":"Stapp car crash journal","volume":"66 ","pages":"69-97"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2022-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"41111344","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Driving Behavior during Right-Turn Maneuvers at Intersections on Left-Hand Traffic Roads. 在左侧交通道路交叉口进行右转机动时的驾驶行为。
Q2 Medicine Pub Date : 2022-11-01 DOI: 10.4271/2022-22-0008
Yasuhiro Matsui, Naruyuki Hosokawa, Shoko Oikawa

In Japan, where vehicles drive on the left side of the road, pedestrian fatal accidents caused by vehicles traveling at speeds of less than or equal to 20 km/h, occur most frequently when a vehicle is turning right. The objective of the present study is to clarify the driving behavior in terms of eye glances and driver speeds when drivers of two different types of vehicles turn right at an intersection on a left-hand traffic road. We experimentally investigated the drivers' gaze, vehicle speed, and distance on the vehicle traveling trajectory from the vehicle to the pedestrian crossing line, using a sedan and a truck with a gross vehicle weight of < 7.5 tons (a light-duty truck) during right-turn maneuver. We considered four different conditions: no pedestrian dummy (No-P), right pedestrian dummy (R-P), left pedestrian dummy (L-P), and right and left pedestrian dummies (RL-P). Regarding the gazing characteristics, there was no significant difference in the average total gaze time at each AOI between the two vehicles under different conditions, which suggests that the total gaze time was not affected by the vehicle type. All participants gazed at the pedestrian dummies in R-P, L-P, and RL-P. However, the average total gaze time at the right pedestrian dummy (0.63-0.72 s) in R-P was significantly shorter than that at the left pedestrian dummy (1.46-1.57 s) in L- P for both vehicles. The average vehicle speed at the entrance line to the intersection (L1) of the light-duty truck (16.8-18.2 km/h) was lower than that of the sedan (18.8-19.7 km/h). The average vehicle speed at the pedestrian crossing line (L0) of the light-duty truck (15.5-16.0 km/h) was lower than that of the sedan (16.0-17.8 km/h). There was no significant difference in the average vehicle speeds at L1 and L0 between them under any two conditions. We investigated the estimated time to collision (TTC), calculated from the distance on the vehicle traveling trajectory from the vehicle to the pedestrian crossing line and the vehicle speed at the moment when the drivers first gazed at the pedestrian dummies. The average TTC of the right pedestrian dummy in R-P for the sedan (3.5 s) was significantly shorter than that for the light-duty truck (4.0 s). Similarly, the average TTC of the left pedestrian dummy in L-P for the sedan (3.7 s) was significantly shorter than that for the light-duty truck (4.8 s). The driving characteristics obtained in this study may contribute to the development of advanced driver support systems, particularly for vehicles turning right at intersections.

在日本,车辆在道路左侧行驶,由车辆以小于或等于20公里/小时的速度行驶引起的行人致命事故最常发生在车辆右转时。本研究的目的是阐明当两种不同类型车辆的驾驶员在左侧交通道路的十字路口右转时,从眼神和驾驶员速度方面的驾驶行为。我们使用一辆轿车和一辆车辆总重<7.5吨的卡车(轻型卡车)在右转机动过程中,对驾驶员在车辆行驶轨迹上从车辆到人行横道的视线、车速和距离进行了实验研究。我们考虑了四种不同的情况:无行人假人(no-P)、右侧行人假人(R-P)、左侧行人假人(L-P)以及左右两侧行人假人(RL-P)。关于凝视特征,在不同条件下,两辆车在每个AOI的平均总凝视时间没有显著差异,这表明总凝视时间不受车型的影响。所有参与者都凝视着R-P、L-P和RL-P中的行人假人。然而,对于两辆车,R-P中右侧行人假人的平均总注视时间(0.63-0.72 s)明显短于L-P中左侧行人假人的总注视时间。轻型卡车在十字路口(L1)入口线的平均车速(16.8-18.2 km/h)低于轿车(18.8-19.7 km/h)。轻型卡车在人行横道(L0)处的平均车速(15.5-16.0 km/h)低于轿车(16.0-17.8 km/h)。在任何两种条件下,它们在L1和L0处的平均车速没有显著差异。我们研究了估计碰撞时间(TTC),该时间是根据车辆行驶轨迹上从车辆到人行横道的距离以及驾驶员第一次凝视行人假人时的车速计算得出的。轿车(3.5s)的R-P中右侧行人假人的平均TTC明显短于轻型卡车(4.0s)。同样,轿车(3.7 s)的L-P中左侧行人假人的平均TTC明显短于轻型卡车(4.8 s)。本研究中获得的驾驶特性可能有助于开发先进的驾驶员支持系统,特别是针对在十字路口右转的车辆。
{"title":"Driving Behavior during Right-Turn Maneuvers at Intersections on Left-Hand Traffic Roads.","authors":"Yasuhiro Matsui,&nbsp;Naruyuki Hosokawa,&nbsp;Shoko Oikawa","doi":"10.4271/2022-22-0008","DOIUrl":"10.4271/2022-22-0008","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>In Japan, where vehicles drive on the left side of the road, pedestrian fatal accidents caused by vehicles traveling at speeds of less than or equal to 20 km/h, occur most frequently when a vehicle is turning right. The objective of the present study is to clarify the driving behavior in terms of eye glances and driver speeds when drivers of two different types of vehicles turn right at an intersection on a left-hand traffic road. We experimentally investigated the drivers' gaze, vehicle speed, and distance on the vehicle traveling trajectory from the vehicle to the pedestrian crossing line, using a sedan and a truck with a gross vehicle weight of < 7.5 tons (a light-duty truck) during right-turn maneuver. We considered four different conditions: no pedestrian dummy (No-P), right pedestrian dummy (R-P), left pedestrian dummy (L-P), and right and left pedestrian dummies (RL-P). Regarding the gazing characteristics, there was no significant difference in the average total gaze time at each AOI between the two vehicles under different conditions, which suggests that the total gaze time was not affected by the vehicle type. All participants gazed at the pedestrian dummies in R-P, L-P, and RL-P. However, the average total gaze time at the right pedestrian dummy (0.63-0.72 s) in R-P was significantly shorter than that at the left pedestrian dummy (1.46-1.57 s) in L- P for both vehicles. The average vehicle speed at the entrance line to the intersection (L1) of the light-duty truck (16.8-18.2 km/h) was lower than that of the sedan (18.8-19.7 km/h). The average vehicle speed at the pedestrian crossing line (L0) of the light-duty truck (15.5-16.0 km/h) was lower than that of the sedan (16.0-17.8 km/h). There was no significant difference in the average vehicle speeds at L1 and L0 between them under any two conditions. We investigated the estimated time to collision (TTC), calculated from the distance on the vehicle traveling trajectory from the vehicle to the pedestrian crossing line and the vehicle speed at the moment when the drivers first gazed at the pedestrian dummies. The average TTC of the right pedestrian dummy in R-P for the sedan (3.5 s) was significantly shorter than that for the light-duty truck (4.0 s). Similarly, the average TTC of the left pedestrian dummy in L-P for the sedan (3.7 s) was significantly shorter than that for the light-duty truck (4.8 s). The driving characteristics obtained in this study may contribute to the development of advanced driver support systems, particularly for vehicles turning right at intersections.</p>","PeriodicalId":35289,"journal":{"name":"Stapp car crash journal","volume":"66 ","pages":"217-238"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2022-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"41150609","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Investigation of Potential Injury Patterns and Occupant Kinematicsin Frontal Impact with PMHS in Reclined Postures. PMHS在倾斜姿势下正面碰撞潜在损伤模式和乘员运动的研究。
Q2 Medicine Pub Date : 2022-11-01 DOI: 10.4271/2022-22-0001
Pascal Baudrit, Jérôme Uriot, Olivier Richard, Matthieu Debray

The reality of the autonomous vehicle in a near future is growing and is expected to induce significant change inthe occupant posture with respect to a standard driving posture. The delegated driving would allow sleeping and/or resting in a seatwith a reclined posture. However, the data in the literature are rare on the body kinematics, human tolerance, and injury types insuch reclined postures. The current study aims at increasing the knowledge in the domain and providing useful data to assess therelevance of the standard injury assessment tools such as anthropomorphic test devices or finite element human body models. For that purpose, a test series of three male Post-Mortem Human Subjects (PMHS) were performed in frontal impact at a 13.4 m/sdelta V. The backseat inclination was 58 degrees with respect to the vertical axis. The semi-rigid seat developed by Uriot et al.(2015) was used with a stiffer seat ramp. The restraint was composed of a lap belt equipped with two 3.5 kN load limiters, and ofa shoulder belt equipped of a 4 kN load limiter on the upper anchorage placed in the vicinity of the shoulder. The belts, the semi-rigid seat, and the footrest were equipped with force sensors. The rotations of the seat pan and of the seat ramp were also measured. The PMHS were instrumented with multi-axis accelerometers and Y angular velocity sensors attached to the head, thorax (T1 andT12 vertebrae), and sacrum. Strain gauges were glued onto the anterior face of the L1 to L5 lumbar vertebrae and onto the anteriorface of the iliac wings. To estimate the pelvis kinematics, a rigid support equipped with targets was fixed onto the femur shaft. Prior to test, X-ray imagery was performed to exhibit the initial curvature of the lumbar spine. After the tests, an in-depth necropsywas done, with a specific attention to the lumbar spine. In the chosen test conditions, no lap-belt submarining was observed for the three PMHS. One PMHS sustained an AIS2 pelvic ringfracture and another one sustained an AIS4 injury with complete separation of the left and right sacroiliac joints. Lumbar discruptures and vertebral fractures were observed for the three PMHS (AIS 2 and AIS3 coding). The number of separated rib fractureswere very different from one PMHS to another (0, 6 and 33). Response corridors for the external forces and kinematics were builtand are presented in the paper. The results are discussed by comparing with existing data for which the backseat was in standardposture.

在不久的将来,自动驾驶汽车的现实正在增长,预计相对于标准驾驶姿势,它将导致乘员姿势的显著变化。委托驾驶将允许以倾斜的姿势在座椅上睡觉和/或休息。然而,文献中关于身体运动学、人体耐受性和仰卧姿势损伤类型的数据很少。目前的研究旨在增加该领域的知识,并提供有用的数据来评估标准损伤评估工具(如拟人化测试设备或有限元人体模型)的相关性。为此,对三名男性死后人类受试者(PMHS)进行了一系列测试,以13.4 m/s的速度进行正面碰撞。后座相对于纵轴倾斜58度。Uriot等人(2015)开发的半刚性座椅与更硬的座椅坡道一起使用。约束装置由一条配有两个3.5千牛负载限制器的腰带和一条在肩部附近的上部固定装置上配有4千牛负载限制装置的肩带组成。安全带、半刚性座椅和脚凳都配备了力传感器。还测量了座椅底板和座椅坡道的旋转。PMHS配备了多轴加速度计和Y角速度传感器,连接在头部、胸部(T1和T12椎骨)和骶骨上。应变片粘在L1至L5腰椎的前表面和髂骨翼的前表面上。为了估计骨盆运动学,在股骨轴上固定了一个装有目标的刚性支架。在测试之前,进行X射线成像以显示腰椎的初始弯曲。测试后,进行了深入的尸检,特别注意腰椎。在选定的试验条件下,未观察到三个PMHS的安全带次级损坏。一名PMHS遭受AIS2骨盆环骨折,另一名遭受AIS4损伤,左右骶髂关节完全分离。对三种PMHS(AIS2和AIS3编码)进行了腰椎间盘突出和脊椎骨折的观察。不同PMHS的分离肋骨骨折数量非常不同(0、6和33)。建立了外力和运动学的响应走廊,并给出了相应的响应走廊。通过与后座处于标准姿态的现有数据进行比较,对结果进行了讨论。
{"title":"Investigation of Potential Injury Patterns and Occupant Kinematicsin Frontal Impact with PMHS in Reclined Postures.","authors":"Pascal Baudrit,&nbsp;Jérôme Uriot,&nbsp;Olivier Richard,&nbsp;Matthieu Debray","doi":"10.4271/2022-22-0001","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.4271/2022-22-0001","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The reality of the autonomous vehicle in a near future is growing and is expected to induce significant change inthe occupant posture with respect to a standard driving posture. The delegated driving would allow sleeping and/or resting in a seatwith a reclined posture. However, the data in the literature are rare on the body kinematics, human tolerance, and injury types insuch reclined postures. The current study aims at increasing the knowledge in the domain and providing useful data to assess therelevance of the standard injury assessment tools such as anthropomorphic test devices or finite element human body models. For that purpose, a test series of three male Post-Mortem Human Subjects (PMHS) were performed in frontal impact at a 13.4 m/sdelta V. The backseat inclination was 58 degrees with respect to the vertical axis. The semi-rigid seat developed by Uriot et al.(2015) was used with a stiffer seat ramp. The restraint was composed of a lap belt equipped with two 3.5 kN load limiters, and ofa shoulder belt equipped of a 4 kN load limiter on the upper anchorage placed in the vicinity of the shoulder. The belts, the semi-rigid seat, and the footrest were equipped with force sensors. The rotations of the seat pan and of the seat ramp were also measured. The PMHS were instrumented with multi-axis accelerometers and Y angular velocity sensors attached to the head, thorax (T1 andT12 vertebrae), and sacrum. Strain gauges were glued onto the anterior face of the L1 to L5 lumbar vertebrae and onto the anteriorface of the iliac wings. To estimate the pelvis kinematics, a rigid support equipped with targets was fixed onto the femur shaft. Prior to test, X-ray imagery was performed to exhibit the initial curvature of the lumbar spine. After the tests, an in-depth necropsywas done, with a specific attention to the lumbar spine. In the chosen test conditions, no lap-belt submarining was observed for the three PMHS. One PMHS sustained an AIS2 pelvic ringfracture and another one sustained an AIS4 injury with complete separation of the left and right sacroiliac joints. Lumbar discruptures and vertebral fractures were observed for the three PMHS (AIS 2 and AIS3 coding). The number of separated rib fractureswere very different from one PMHS to another (0, 6 and 33). Response corridors for the external forces and kinematics were builtand are presented in the paper. The results are discussed by comparing with existing data for which the backseat was in standardposture.</p>","PeriodicalId":35289,"journal":{"name":"Stapp car crash journal","volume":"66 ","pages":"1-30"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2022-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"41168556","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2
Effect of Tissue Erosion Modeling Techniques on Pedestrian Impact Kinematics. 组织侵蚀建模技术对行人碰撞运动学的影响。
Q2 Medicine Pub Date : 2022-11-01 DOI: 10.4271/2022-22-0007
Daniel Grindle, Costin Untaroiu

The pedestrian is one of the most vulnerable road users and has experienced increased numbers of injuries and deaths caused by car-to-pedestrian collisions over the last decade. To curb this trend, finite element models of pedestrians have been developed to investigate pedestrian protection in vehicle impact simulations. While useful, modeling practices vary across research groups, especially when applying knee/ankle ligament and bone failure. To help better standardize modeling practices this study explored the effect of knee ligament and bone element elimination on pedestrian impact outcomes. A male 50th percentile model was impacted by three European generic vehicles at 30, 40, and 50 km/h. The pedestrian model was set to three element elimination settings: the "Off-model" didn't allow any element erosion, the "Lig-model" allowed lower-extremity ligament erosion, and the "All-model" allowed lower-extremity ligament and bone erosion. Failure toggling had a significant effect on impact outcomes (0 < p ≤ 0.03). The head impact time response was typically the smallest for the "Off-model" while the wrap around distance response was always largest for the All-model. Moderate differences in maximum vehicle-pedestrian contact forces across elimination techniques were reported in this study (0.1 - 1.7 kN). Future work will examine additional failure modelling approaches, model anthropometries and vehicles to expand this investigation.

行人是最脆弱的道路使用者之一,在过去十年中,汽车与行人碰撞造成的伤亡人数有所增加。为了遏制这一趋势,已经开发了行人的有限元模型,以研究车辆碰撞模拟中的行人保护。虽然建模很有用,但各研究小组的建模实践各不相同,尤其是在应用膝/踝韧带和骨衰竭时。为了更好地规范建模实践,本研究探讨了膝盖韧带和骨元素消除对行人碰撞结果的影响。一个男性第50百分位模型在30、40和50公里/小时的速度下受到三辆欧洲通用汽车的影响。行人模型设置为三个元素消除设置:“关闭模型”不允许任何元素侵蚀,“Lig模型”允许下肢韧带侵蚀,“所有模型”允许上肢韧带和骨骼侵蚀。故障切换对撞击结果有显著影响(0
{"title":"Effect of Tissue Erosion Modeling Techniques on Pedestrian Impact Kinematics.","authors":"Daniel Grindle,&nbsp;Costin Untaroiu","doi":"10.4271/2022-22-0007","DOIUrl":"10.4271/2022-22-0007","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The pedestrian is one of the most vulnerable road users and has experienced increased numbers of injuries and deaths caused by car-to-pedestrian collisions over the last decade. To curb this trend, finite element models of pedestrians have been developed to investigate pedestrian protection in vehicle impact simulations. While useful, modeling practices vary across research groups, especially when applying knee/ankle ligament and bone failure. To help better standardize modeling practices this study explored the effect of knee ligament and bone element elimination on pedestrian impact outcomes. A male 50th percentile model was impacted by three European generic vehicles at 30, 40, and 50 km/h. The pedestrian model was set to three element elimination settings: the \"Off-model\" didn't allow any element erosion, the \"Lig-model\" allowed lower-extremity ligament erosion, and the \"All-model\" allowed lower-extremity ligament and bone erosion. Failure toggling had a significant effect on impact outcomes (0 < p ≤ 0.03). The head impact time response was typically the smallest for the \"Off-model\" while the wrap around distance response was always largest for the All-model. Moderate differences in maximum vehicle-pedestrian contact forces across elimination techniques were reported in this study (0.1 - 1.7 kN). Future work will examine additional failure modelling approaches, model anthropometries and vehicles to expand this investigation.</p>","PeriodicalId":35289,"journal":{"name":"Stapp car crash journal","volume":"66 ","pages":"207-216"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2022-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"41151113","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
A Comparison of the Mid-Size Male THOR and Hybrid III ATDs in Vehicle Frontal Crash Tests. 中型男性THOR和混合III型ATD在汽车正面碰撞试验中的比较。
Q2 Medicine Pub Date : 2022-11-01 DOI: 10.4271/2022-22-0005
Chris O'Connor, Agnes Kim, Tim Barrette, Jeff Dix

In order to evaluate the THOR-50M as a front impact Anthropomorphic Test Device (ATD) for vehicle safety design, the ATD was compared to the H3-50M in matching vehicle crash tests for 20 unique vehicle models from 2 vehicle manufacturers. For the belted driver condition, a total of fifty-four crash tests were investigated in the 56.3 km/h (35 mph) front rigid barrier impact condition. Four more tests were compared for the unbelted driver and right front passenger at 40.2 km/h (25 mph) in the flat frontal and 30-degree right oblique rigid barrier impact conditions. The two ATDs were also evaluated for their ability to predict injury risk by comparing their fleet average injury risk to Crash Investigation Sampling System (CISS) accident data for similar conditions. The differences in seating position and their effect on ATD responses were also investigated. This study showed that the belted THOR-50M injury responses were higher than the H3-50M by 25%-180%, in all reported ATD responses, except chest acceleration. For one unbelted condition, the THOR-50M reported 200%-300% higher neck responses than the H3-50M, primarily due to head contact to the roof structure in a mid-sized sedan. The THOR-50M overpredicted the injury risk based on chest deflection compared to the CISS accident data by at least a factor of 4 times. The THOR-50M also overpredicted the injury risk based on BrIC by at least a factor of 10 times. Future work is needed to investigate these overpredictions with respect to ATD construction, injury risk curves, and seating procedures.

为了评估THOR-50M作为车辆安全设计的前碰撞拟人试验装置(ATD),在2家汽车制造商的20款独特车型的匹配车辆碰撞试验中,将ATD与H3-50M进行了比较。对于系安全带的驾驶员情况,在56.3公里/小时(35英里/小时)的前刚性护栏碰撞条件下,共进行了五十四次碰撞测试。在平坦正面和30度右倾斜刚性壁障碰撞条件下,以40.2公里/小时(25英里/小时)的速度对无安全带驾驶员和右前排乘客进行了另外四次测试比较。通过将两辆ATD的车队平均伤害风险与类似条件下的碰撞调查采样系统(CISS)事故数据进行比较,还评估了它们预测伤害风险的能力。还研究了座位的差异及其对ATD反应的影响。这项研究表明,在所有报告的ATD反应中,除了胸部加速外,系腰带的THOR-50M损伤反应比H3-50M高25%-180%。对于一种未系安全带的情况,THOR-50M报告的颈部反应比H3-50M高200%-300%,主要是由于中型轿车的头部与车顶结构接触。与CISS事故数据相比,THOR-50M基于胸部偏转的受伤风险高估了至少4倍。THOR-50M还将基于BrIC的损伤风险高估了至少10倍。未来的工作需要调查ATD结构、伤害风险曲线和座位程序方面的这些过度预测。
{"title":"A Comparison of the Mid-Size Male THOR and Hybrid III ATDs in Vehicle Frontal Crash Tests.","authors":"Chris O'Connor,&nbsp;Agnes Kim,&nbsp;Tim Barrette,&nbsp;Jeff Dix","doi":"10.4271/2022-22-0005","DOIUrl":"10.4271/2022-22-0005","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>In order to evaluate the THOR-50M as a front impact Anthropomorphic Test Device (ATD) for vehicle safety design, the ATD was compared to the H3-50M in matching vehicle crash tests for 20 unique vehicle models from 2 vehicle manufacturers. For the belted driver condition, a total of fifty-four crash tests were investigated in the 56.3 km/h (35 mph) front rigid barrier impact condition. Four more tests were compared for the unbelted driver and right front passenger at 40.2 km/h (25 mph) in the flat frontal and 30-degree right oblique rigid barrier impact conditions. The two ATDs were also evaluated for their ability to predict injury risk by comparing their fleet average injury risk to Crash Investigation Sampling System (CISS) accident data for similar conditions. The differences in seating position and their effect on ATD responses were also investigated. This study showed that the belted THOR-50M injury responses were higher than the H3-50M by 25%-180%, in all reported ATD responses, except chest acceleration. For one unbelted condition, the THOR-50M reported 200%-300% higher neck responses than the H3-50M, primarily due to head contact to the roof structure in a mid-sized sedan. The THOR-50M overpredicted the injury risk based on chest deflection compared to the CISS accident data by at least a factor of 4 times. The THOR-50M also overpredicted the injury risk based on BrIC by at least a factor of 10 times. Future work is needed to investigate these overpredictions with respect to ATD construction, injury risk curves, and seating procedures.</p>","PeriodicalId":35289,"journal":{"name":"Stapp car crash journal","volume":"66 ","pages":"143-173"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2022-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"41142738","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1
Lower Extremity Validation of a Human Body Model for High Rate Axial Loading in the Underbody Blast Environment. 人体模型在车底爆炸环境中高速轴向载荷的下限验证。
Q2 Medicine Pub Date : 2022-11-01 DOI: 10.4271/2022-22-0004
Zachary S Hostetler, Juliette Caffrey, Jazmine Aira, F Scott Gayzik

While the use of Human Body Models (HBMs) in the underbody blast (UBB) environment has increased and shown positive results, the potential of these models has not been fully explored. Obtaining accurate kinematic and kinetic response are necessary to better understand the injury mechanisms for military safety applications. The objective of this study was to validate the Global Human Body Models Consortium (GHBMC) M50 lower extremity using a combined objective rating scheme in vertical and horizontal high-rate axial loading. The model's lower extremity biomechanical response was compared to Post Mortem Human Subjects (PMHS) subjects for vertically and horizontally-applied high rate axial loading. Two distinct experimental setups were used for model validation, comprising a total of 33 distinct end points for validation. A combined Correlation and Analysis (CORA) score that incorporates CORA, time-to-peak (TTP) and peak magnitude of the experimental signals and ISO TS 18571 was used to evaluate the model response. For the horizontal impacts, the combined CORA scores were 0.80, 0.84, and 0.81 for compression, force, and strain respectively. For the vertical impacts combined CORA scores for the knee Z force, compression and heel Z displacement ranged from 0.70-0.81, 0.87-0.91, and 0.82-0.99 respectively. The GHBMC lower extremity model showed good agreement with PMHS experimental data in the horizontal and vertical loading environment in 33 unique tests. The accuracy is demonstrated by using the ISO TS 18571 standard and a combined CORA score that takes into consideration the peak and time to peak of the signal. The results of this study show that GHBMC v 6.0 HBM lower extremity can be used for kinetic and kinematic predictions in the UBB environment.

虽然人体模型(HBM)在车底爆炸(UBB)环境中的使用有所增加并显示出积极的结果,但这些模型的潜力尚未得到充分探索。为了更好地理解军事安全应用的损伤机制,获得准确的运动学和动力学响应是必要的。本研究的目的是验证全球人体模型联合会(GHBMC)M50下肢在垂直和水平高速轴向载荷下的联合目标评级方案。将模型的下肢生物力学反应与死后人类受试者(PMHS)受试者在垂直和水平方向施加高速轴向载荷时的生物力学反应进行比较。两个不同的实验装置用于模型验证,共包括33个不同的验证终点。使用结合了CORA、峰值时间(TTP)和实验信号的峰值幅度以及ISO TS 18571的联合相关与分析(CORA)评分来评估模型响应。对于水平冲击,压缩、力和应变的综合CORA得分分别为0.80、0.84和0.81。对于垂直冲击,膝盖Z力、压缩和脚跟Z位移的CORA综合评分范围分别为0.70-0.81、0.87-0.91和0.82-0.99。GHBMC下肢模型在33个独特的试验中,在水平和垂直载荷环境下与PMHS实验数据显示出良好的一致性。通过使用ISO TS 18571标准和考虑信号峰值和峰值时间的组合CORA分数来证明准确性。本研究的结果表明,GHBMC v6.0 HBM下肢可用于UBB环境中的动力学和运动学预测。
{"title":"Lower Extremity Validation of a Human Body Model for High Rate Axial Loading in the Underbody Blast Environment.","authors":"Zachary S Hostetler,&nbsp;Juliette Caffrey,&nbsp;Jazmine Aira,&nbsp;F Scott Gayzik","doi":"10.4271/2022-22-0004","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.4271/2022-22-0004","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>While the use of Human Body Models (HBMs) in the underbody blast (UBB) environment has increased and shown positive results, the potential of these models has not been fully explored. Obtaining accurate kinematic and kinetic response are necessary to better understand the injury mechanisms for military safety applications. The objective of this study was to validate the Global Human Body Models Consortium (GHBMC) M50 lower extremity using a combined objective rating scheme in vertical and horizontal high-rate axial loading. The model's lower extremity biomechanical response was compared to Post Mortem Human Subjects (PMHS) subjects for vertically and horizontally-applied high rate axial loading. Two distinct experimental setups were used for model validation, comprising a total of 33 distinct end points for validation. A combined Correlation and Analysis (CORA) score that incorporates CORA, time-to-peak (TTP) and peak magnitude of the experimental signals and ISO TS 18571 was used to evaluate the model response. For the horizontal impacts, the combined CORA scores were 0.80, 0.84, and 0.81 for compression, force, and strain respectively. For the vertical impacts combined CORA scores for the knee Z force, compression and heel Z displacement ranged from 0.70-0.81, 0.87-0.91, and 0.82-0.99 respectively. The GHBMC lower extremity model showed good agreement with PMHS experimental data in the horizontal and vertical loading environment in 33 unique tests. The accuracy is demonstrated by using the ISO TS 18571 standard and a combined CORA score that takes into consideration the peak and time to peak of the signal. The results of this study show that GHBMC v 6.0 HBM lower extremity can be used for kinetic and kinematic predictions in the UBB environment.</p>","PeriodicalId":35289,"journal":{"name":"Stapp car crash journal","volume":"66 ","pages":"99-142"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2022-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"41136963","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Understanding Head Injury Risks During Car-to-Pedestrian Collisions Using Realistic Vehicle and Detailed Human Body Models. 使用真实的车辆和详细的人体模型了解汽车与行人碰撞过程中的头部伤害风险。
Q2 Medicine Pub Date : 2022-11-01 DOI: 10.4271/2022-22-0006
Kalish Gunasekaran, Sakib Ul Islam, Haojie Mao

Traumatic brain injury (TBI) is the leading cause of death and long-term disability in road traffic accidents (RTAs). Researchers have examined the effect of vehicle front shape and pedestrian body size on the risk of pedestrian head injury. On the other hand, the relationship between vehicle front shape parameters and pedestrian TBI risks involving a diverse population with varying body sizes has yet to be investigated. Thus, the purpose of this study was to comprehensively study the effect of vehicle front shape parameters and various pedestrian bodies ranging from 95th percentile male (AM95) to 6 years old (YO) child on the dynamic response of the head and the risk of TBIs during primary (vehicle) impact. At three different collision speeds (30, 40, and 50 km/h), a total of 36 car-to-pedestrian collisions (CPCs) were reconstructed using three different vehicle types (Subcompact passenger sedan, mid-sedan, and sports utility vehicle (SUV)) and four distinct THUMS pedestrian finite element (FE) models (AM50, AM95, AF05, and 6YO). We assessed skull stress and brain strains besides head linear and rotational kinematics. Our findings indicate that vehicle shape parameters especially bonnet leading edge height (BLEH), when being divided by the height of the Center of Gravity of the human body, correlated positively to head kinematics. The data from this study using realistic vehicle structures and detailed human body models showed that smaller BLEH/CG ratios reduced head injury criteria (HIC) and brain injury criteria (BrIC) values for the car center to mid-stance walking pedestrian impacts but with low-to-moderate R squared values between 0.2 to 0.5. Smaller BLEH/CG reduced head lateral bending velocities with R squared values of 0.57 to 0.63 for all impact velocities, and reduced HIC with R squared value of 0.62 for 50 km/h cases. In the future, simulations with realistic car structures and detailed human body models will be further used to simulate impacts at different locations and with various body shapes/postures.

创伤性脑损伤(TBI)是道路交通事故中死亡和长期残疾的主要原因。研究人员研究了车辆前部形状和行人体型对行人头部受伤风险的影响。另一方面,涉及不同体型的不同人群的车辆前部形状参数与行人TBI风险之间的关系尚待研究。因此,本研究的目的是全面研究车辆前部形状参数和从第95百分位男性(AM95)到6岁(YO)儿童的各种行人身体对头部动态反应和初次(车辆)碰撞期间TBI风险的影响。在三种不同的碰撞速度(30、40和50 km/h)下,使用三种不同车型(亚紧凑型乘用车、中型轿车和运动型多用途车(SUV))和四种不同的THUMS行人有限元(FE)模型(AM50、AM95、AF05和6YO),共重建了36起车-人碰撞(CPC)。除了头部线性和旋转运动学外,我们还评估了颅骨应力和大脑应变。我们的研究结果表明,车辆形状参数,特别是发动机罩前缘高度(BLEH),当除以人体重心高度时,与头部运动学呈正相关。使用真实的车辆结构和详细的人体模型进行的这项研究的数据表明,较小的BLEH/CG比率降低了汽车中心到中站步行行人碰撞的头部损伤标准(HIC)和脑损伤标准(BrIC)值,但低到中等的R平方值在0.2到0.5之间。较小的BLEH/CG降低了所有冲击速度下的头部横向弯曲速度,R平方值为0.57至0.63,并降低了50km/h情况下的HIC,R平方为0.62。未来,具有逼真汽车结构和详细人体模型的模拟将进一步用于模拟不同位置和不同体型/姿势的碰撞。
{"title":"Understanding Head Injury Risks During Car-to-Pedestrian Collisions Using Realistic Vehicle and Detailed Human Body Models.","authors":"Kalish Gunasekaran,&nbsp;Sakib Ul Islam,&nbsp;Haojie Mao","doi":"10.4271/2022-22-0006","DOIUrl":"10.4271/2022-22-0006","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Traumatic brain injury (TBI) is the leading cause of death and long-term disability in road traffic accidents (RTAs). Researchers have examined the effect of vehicle front shape and pedestrian body size on the risk of pedestrian head injury. On the other hand, the relationship between vehicle front shape parameters and pedestrian TBI risks involving a diverse population with varying body sizes has yet to be investigated. Thus, the purpose of this study was to comprehensively study the effect of vehicle front shape parameters and various pedestrian bodies ranging from 95th percentile male (AM95) to 6 years old (YO) child on the dynamic response of the head and the risk of TBIs during primary (vehicle) impact. At three different collision speeds (30, 40, and 50 km/h), a total of 36 car-to-pedestrian collisions (CPCs) were reconstructed using three different vehicle types (Subcompact passenger sedan, mid-sedan, and sports utility vehicle (SUV)) and four distinct THUMS pedestrian finite element (FE) models (AM50, AM95, AF05, and 6YO). We assessed skull stress and brain strains besides head linear and rotational kinematics. Our findings indicate that vehicle shape parameters especially bonnet leading edge height (BLEH), when being divided by the height of the Center of Gravity of the human body, correlated positively to head kinematics. The data from this study using realistic vehicle structures and detailed human body models showed that smaller BLEH/CG ratios reduced head injury criteria (HIC) and brain injury criteria (BrIC) values for the car center to mid-stance walking pedestrian impacts but with low-to-moderate R squared values between 0.2 to 0.5. Smaller BLEH/CG reduced head lateral bending velocities with R squared values of 0.57 to 0.63 for all impact velocities, and reduced HIC with R squared value of 0.62 for 50 km/h cases. In the future, simulations with realistic car structures and detailed human body models will be further used to simulate impacts at different locations and with various body shapes/postures.</p>","PeriodicalId":35289,"journal":{"name":"Stapp car crash journal","volume":"66 ","pages":"175-205"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2022-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"41158181","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Obese Occupant Response in Reclined and Upright Seated Postures in Frontal Impacts. 正面碰撞中倾斜和直立姿势下肥胖乘客的反应。
Q2 Medicine Pub Date : 2022-11-01 DOI: 10.4271/2022-22-0002
Karthik Somasundaram, John R Humm, Narayan Yoganandan, Hans Hauschild, Klaus Driesslein, Frank A Pintar

The American population is getting heavier and automated vehicles will accommodate unconventional postures. While studies replicating mid-size and upright fore-aft seated occupants are numerous, experiments with post-mortem human subjects (PMHS) with obese and reclined occupants are sparse. The objective of this study was to compare the kinematics of the head-neck, torso and pelvis, and document injuries and injury patterns in frontal impacts. Six PMHS with a mean body mass index of 38.2 ± 5.3 kg/m2 were equally divided between upright and reclined groups (seatback: 23°, 45°), restrained by a three-point integrated belt, positioned on a semi-rigid seat, and exposed to low and moderate velocities (15, 32 km/h). Data included belt loads, spinal accelerations, kinematics, and injuries from x-rays, computed tomography, and necropsy. At 15 km/h speed, no significant difference in the occupant kinematics and evidence of orthopedic failure was observed. At 32 km/h speed, the primary difference between the cohorts was significantly larger Z displacements in the reclined occupant at the head (190 ± 32 mm, vs. 105 ± 33 mm p < 0.05) and femur (52 ± 18 mm vs. 30 ± 10 mm, p < 0.05). All the moderate-speed tests produced at least one thorax injury. Rib fractures were scattered around the circumference of the rib-cage in the upright, while they were primarily concentrated on the anterior aspect of the rib-cage in two reclined specimens. Although MAIS was the same in both groups, the reclined specimens had more bi-cortical rib fractures, suggesting the potential for pneumothorax. While not statistical, these results suggest enhanced injuries with reclined obese occupants. These results could serve as a data set for validating the response of restrained obese anthropometric test device (ATDs) and computational human body models.

美国人口越来越重,自动化车辆将适应非常规姿态。虽然复制中等体型和直立前后座乘客的研究很多,但对肥胖和倾斜乘客的死后人类受试者(PMHS)的实验很少。本研究的目的是比较头颈部、躯干和骨盆的运动学,并记录正面碰撞中的损伤和损伤模式。将6个平均体重指数为38.2±5.3 kg/m2的PMHS平均分为直立组和倾斜组(座椅靠背:23°、45°),由三点式安全带约束,放置在半刚性座椅上,并暴露在低和中等速度(15、32 km/h)下。数据包括皮带负荷、脊椎加速度、运动学和x光片、计算机断层扫描和尸检造成的损伤。在15公里/小时的速度下,没有观察到乘员运动学和矫形失败证据的显著差异。在32 km/h的速度下,两组之间的主要差异是头部(190±32 mm,对105±33 mm,p<0.05)和股骨(52±18 mm,对30±10 mm,p>0.05)倾斜乘坐者的Z位移明显更大。所有中速测试都至少造成一次胸部损伤。肋骨骨折分布在直立的胸腔周围,而在两个倾斜的标本中,肋骨骨折主要集中在胸腔的前部。尽管两组的MAIS相同,但斜倚的标本有更多的双侧皮质肋骨骨折,这表明有可能发生肺气肿。虽然没有统计数据,但这些结果表明,倾斜的肥胖乘客的伤害会增加。这些结果可以作为验证约束肥胖人体测量设备(ATD)和计算人体模型响应的数据集。
{"title":"Obese Occupant Response in Reclined and Upright Seated Postures in Frontal Impacts.","authors":"Karthik Somasundaram,&nbsp;John R Humm,&nbsp;Narayan Yoganandan,&nbsp;Hans Hauschild,&nbsp;Klaus Driesslein,&nbsp;Frank A Pintar","doi":"10.4271/2022-22-0002","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.4271/2022-22-0002","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The American population is getting heavier and automated vehicles will accommodate unconventional postures. While studies replicating mid-size and upright fore-aft seated occupants are numerous, experiments with post-mortem human subjects (PMHS) with obese and reclined occupants are sparse. The objective of this study was to compare the kinematics of the head-neck, torso and pelvis, and document injuries and injury patterns in frontal impacts. Six PMHS with a mean body mass index of 38.2 ± 5.3 kg/m2 were equally divided between upright and reclined groups (seatback: 23°, 45°), restrained by a three-point integrated belt, positioned on a semi-rigid seat, and exposed to low and moderate velocities (15, 32 km/h). Data included belt loads, spinal accelerations, kinematics, and injuries from x-rays, computed tomography, and necropsy. At 15 km/h speed, no significant difference in the occupant kinematics and evidence of orthopedic failure was observed. At 32 km/h speed, the primary difference between the cohorts was significantly larger Z displacements in the reclined occupant at the head (190 ± 32 mm, vs. 105 ± 33 mm p < 0.05) and femur (52 ± 18 mm vs. 30 ± 10 mm, p < 0.05). All the moderate-speed tests produced at least one thorax injury. Rib fractures were scattered around the circumference of the rib-cage in the upright, while they were primarily concentrated on the anterior aspect of the rib-cage in two reclined specimens. Although MAIS was the same in both groups, the reclined specimens had more bi-cortical rib fractures, suggesting the potential for pneumothorax. While not statistical, these results suggest enhanced injuries with reclined obese occupants. These results could serve as a data set for validating the response of restrained obese anthropometric test device (ATDs) and computational human body models.</p>","PeriodicalId":35289,"journal":{"name":"Stapp car crash journal","volume":"66 ","pages":"31-68"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2022-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"41131425","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3
期刊
Stapp car crash journal
全部 Acc. Chem. Res. ACS Applied Bio Materials ACS Appl. Electron. Mater. ACS Appl. Energy Mater. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces ACS Appl. Nano Mater. ACS Appl. Polym. Mater. ACS BIOMATER-SCI ENG ACS Catal. ACS Cent. Sci. ACS Chem. Biol. ACS Chemical Health & Safety ACS Chem. Neurosci. ACS Comb. Sci. ACS Earth Space Chem. ACS Energy Lett. ACS Infect. Dis. ACS Macro Lett. ACS Mater. Lett. ACS Med. Chem. Lett. ACS Nano ACS Omega ACS Photonics ACS Sens. ACS Sustainable Chem. Eng. ACS Synth. Biol. Anal. Chem. BIOCHEMISTRY-US Bioconjugate Chem. BIOMACROMOLECULES Chem. Res. Toxicol. Chem. Rev. Chem. Mater. CRYST GROWTH DES ENERG FUEL Environ. Sci. Technol. Environ. Sci. Technol. Lett. Eur. J. Inorg. Chem. IND ENG CHEM RES Inorg. Chem. J. Agric. Food. Chem. J. Chem. Eng. Data J. Chem. Educ. J. Chem. Inf. Model. J. Chem. Theory Comput. J. Med. Chem. J. Nat. Prod. J PROTEOME RES J. Am. Chem. Soc. LANGMUIR MACROMOLECULES Mol. Pharmaceutics Nano Lett. Org. Lett. ORG PROCESS RES DEV ORGANOMETALLICS J. Org. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. A J. Phys. Chem. B J. Phys. Chem. C J. Phys. Chem. Lett. Analyst Anal. Methods Biomater. Sci. Catal. Sci. Technol. Chem. Commun. Chem. Soc. Rev. CHEM EDUC RES PRACT CRYSTENGCOMM Dalton Trans. Energy Environ. Sci. ENVIRON SCI-NANO ENVIRON SCI-PROC IMP ENVIRON SCI-WAT RES Faraday Discuss. Food Funct. Green Chem. Inorg. Chem. Front. Integr. Biol. J. Anal. At. Spectrom. J. Mater. Chem. A J. Mater. Chem. B J. Mater. Chem. C Lab Chip Mater. Chem. Front. Mater. Horiz. MEDCHEMCOMM Metallomics Mol. Biosyst. Mol. Syst. Des. Eng. Nanoscale Nanoscale Horiz. Nat. Prod. Rep. New J. Chem. Org. Biomol. Chem. Org. Chem. Front. PHOTOCH PHOTOBIO SCI PCCP Polym. Chem.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1