Pub Date : 2020-07-01DOI: 10.5935/1676-2444.20200039
Mylner O. F. Souza, Keren Hapuque da Silva Souza, Juvanete A. Távora, É. Costa, R. Resque, Madson R F Gomes, D. S. Dantas
ABSTRACT Introduction: Clinical analysis laboratories are health care facilities that provide resources for outpatient and/or emergency diagnoses; they are regulated in Brazil by the Resolution of the Collegiate Board of Directors (RDC) no. 302, of October 13, 2005, of the Brazilian National Agency of Sanitary Surveillance (Anvisa). Objective: The aim of this study was to perform a normative evaluation in clinical analysis laboratories, based on RDC no. 302, of October 13, 2005. Material and method: This is a cross-sectional and descriptive study. Twelve clinical laboratories participated in the study. The data were obtained through a structured questionnaire and answered by the technical leaders of the participating laboratories, in the municipality of Macapa, Amapa, Brazil. Results: The average nonconformity found among the participants was 9.64%, which allowed an overall evaluation among them as satisfactory, in relation to the minimum requirements demanded by the standardization recommended by Anvisa. When the participants were analyzed individually, there was a variation from 4.82% to 21.69% of the nonconformities index. Other studies agree with the results, however there is disagreement in a research carried out in Porto Alegre, Rio Grande do Sul, Brazil, possibly due to the fact that the laboratories present in this study do not have a quality management system in their processes. Conclusion: Laboratories 2, 3, 4, 6, 9, 11, and 12 were rated as satisfactory. Laboratories 1, 5, 7, 8 and 10 were rated as partially satisfactory. No laboratories were rated as unsatisfactory.
{"title":"Nonconformities in clinical laboratories in Macapá, Amapá, Brazil, based on the RDC no. 302/2005/Anvisa","authors":"Mylner O. F. Souza, Keren Hapuque da Silva Souza, Juvanete A. Távora, É. Costa, R. Resque, Madson R F Gomes, D. S. Dantas","doi":"10.5935/1676-2444.20200039","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.5935/1676-2444.20200039","url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT Introduction: Clinical analysis laboratories are health care facilities that provide resources for outpatient and/or emergency diagnoses; they are regulated in Brazil by the Resolution of the Collegiate Board of Directors (RDC) no. 302, of October 13, 2005, of the Brazilian National Agency of Sanitary Surveillance (Anvisa). Objective: The aim of this study was to perform a normative evaluation in clinical analysis laboratories, based on RDC no. 302, of October 13, 2005. Material and method: This is a cross-sectional and descriptive study. Twelve clinical laboratories participated in the study. The data were obtained through a structured questionnaire and answered by the technical leaders of the participating laboratories, in the municipality of Macapa, Amapa, Brazil. Results: The average nonconformity found among the participants was 9.64%, which allowed an overall evaluation among them as satisfactory, in relation to the minimum requirements demanded by the standardization recommended by Anvisa. When the participants were analyzed individually, there was a variation from 4.82% to 21.69% of the nonconformities index. Other studies agree with the results, however there is disagreement in a research carried out in Porto Alegre, Rio Grande do Sul, Brazil, possibly due to the fact that the laboratories present in this study do not have a quality management system in their processes. Conclusion: Laboratories 2, 3, 4, 6, 9, 11, and 12 were rated as satisfactory. Laboratories 1, 5, 7, 8 and 10 were rated as partially satisfactory. No laboratories were rated as unsatisfactory.","PeriodicalId":35397,"journal":{"name":"Jornal Brasileiro de Patologia e Medicina Laboratorial","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2020-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"47376111","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2020-01-01DOI: 10.5935/1676-2444.20200001
Carolina Emerick, Tamires G. Magalhães, Maria Carolina De Lima Jacy Monteiro Barki, Lívia Ramalho Crescencio, Renata Tucci, Eleni Maria Vianna Brandão Barros, R. D. Azevedo
Objective: To describe demographic and clinicopathologic profile of oral squamous cell carcinoma (OSCC) cases from incisional biopsies collected at the Nova Friburgo Health Institute of the Fluminense Federal University [Instituto de Saúde de Nova Friburgo da Universidade Federal Fluminense (ISNF/UFF)] and at the Raul Sertã Municipal Hospital [Hospital Municipal Raul Sertã (HMRS)]. Methods: Oral Pathology Laboratory records from the ISNF/UFF were reviewed and all cases of OSCC were primarily selected. Cases from ISNF/UFF and HMRS were selected and had their demographic data collected from the medical records. Clinical characteristics were evaluated using the images of the lesions taken on the biopsy day and the laboratory files. The histological slides were later reviewed. Results: Eighty cases of OSCC were identified. Most patients were male (56.7%), with a mean age of 60 years, smoker (62.71%) and/or alcoholic (44.55%). The most affected anatomic site was the tongue (39.49%), presenting mainly as an ulcer (39.49%). Microscopically, the well-differentiated lesions were more common (35.44%), and the mean counting of mitoses was 5.5/10 high-power field. Conclusion: The profile of OSCC patients in Nova Friburgo partly reflects the world literature, with emphasis on the following differences: low average number of mitoses found in the histopathological analysis and prevalence of well-differentiated lesions. Such differences may be a result of the characteristic variations of the local population, reinforcing the importance of conducting epidemiological studies that demonstrate OSCC peculiarities in different regions.
目的:描述在弗鲁米嫩塞联邦大学Nova Friburgo卫生研究所[Instituto de Saúde de Nova Friburgo da Universidade Federal Fluminense (ISNF/UFF)]和Raul Sertã市立医院[Hospital Municipal Raul Sertã (HMRS)]收集的口腔鳞状细胞癌(OSCC)切口活检病例的人口学和临床病理特征。方法:回顾ISNF/UFF的口腔病理实验室记录,主要选择所有OSCC病例。选择来自ISNF/UFF和HMRS的病例,并从医疗记录中收集其人口统计数据。临床特征评估使用的图像病变活检日和实验室文件。组织学切片随后复查。结果:共确诊OSCC 80例。大多数患者为男性(56.7%),平均年龄60岁,吸烟(62.71%)和/或酗酒(44.55%)。受影响最大的解剖部位是舌头(39.49%),主要表现为溃疡(39.49%)。镜下以分化良好的病变多见(35.44%),平均有丝分裂数为5.5/10倍视野。结论:Nova Friburgo地区OSCC患者的情况部分反映了世界文献,重点强调了以下差异:组织病理学分析中发现的平均有丝分裂数低,高分化病变普遍存在。这种差异可能是由于当地人口的特征差异造成的,因此加强了开展流行病学研究的重要性,这些研究表明不同地区的OSCC具有特殊性。
{"title":"Sociodemographic and clinicopathological profile of 80 cases of oral squamous cell\u0000 carcinoma","authors":"Carolina Emerick, Tamires G. Magalhães, Maria Carolina De Lima Jacy Monteiro Barki, Lívia Ramalho Crescencio, Renata Tucci, Eleni Maria Vianna Brandão Barros, R. D. Azevedo","doi":"10.5935/1676-2444.20200001","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.5935/1676-2444.20200001","url":null,"abstract":"Objective: To describe demographic and clinicopathologic profile of oral squamous cell carcinoma (OSCC) cases from incisional biopsies collected at the Nova Friburgo Health Institute of the Fluminense Federal University [Instituto de Saúde de Nova Friburgo da Universidade Federal Fluminense (ISNF/UFF)] and at the Raul Sertã Municipal Hospital [Hospital Municipal Raul Sertã (HMRS)]. Methods: Oral Pathology Laboratory records from the ISNF/UFF were reviewed and all cases of OSCC were primarily selected. Cases from ISNF/UFF and HMRS were selected and had their demographic data collected from the medical records. Clinical characteristics were evaluated using the images of the lesions taken on the biopsy day and the laboratory files. The histological slides were later reviewed. Results: Eighty cases of OSCC were identified. Most patients were male (56.7%), with a mean age of 60 years, smoker (62.71%) and/or alcoholic (44.55%). The most affected anatomic site was the tongue (39.49%), presenting mainly as an ulcer (39.49%). Microscopically, the well-differentiated lesions were more common (35.44%), and the mean counting of mitoses was 5.5/10 high-power field. Conclusion: The profile of OSCC patients in Nova Friburgo partly reflects the world literature, with emphasis on the following differences: low average number of mitoses found in the histopathological analysis and prevalence of well-differentiated lesions. Such differences may be a result of the characteristic variations of the local population, reinforcing the importance of conducting epidemiological studies that demonstrate OSCC peculiarities in different regions.","PeriodicalId":35397,"journal":{"name":"Jornal Brasileiro de Patologia e Medicina Laboratorial","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2020-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"71115820","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}